Russia today

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 22, 2025 3:47 pm

While perhaps it is not for me to say but I find the idea of 'Russian Civilization' to be a chauvinistic reaction to Western aggression, arrogance and down right prejudice. Russia is part of Western Civilization, Peter the Great saw to it. Besides what culture it shares with Western Europe it has it's traditional culture, equal to any. Of course there have long been Russophiles like Dugin, but damn near everybody has a crazy uncle.

One day, One World, no Nazis.

Paul Robinson: ‘Russian Dream’: Ideological Blueprint or Ideologues’ Pressure Tactic for a National Idea?
August 20, 2025 natyliesb
By Paul Robinson, Russia Post, 7/25/25

Ever since the collapse of communism, Russians have struggled to define their national identity, their country’s place in the world, and the values that should underpin their society. In the early 1990s, the idea that Russia was a European country that should rest on liberal democratic values briefly held centre stage, but this vision was soon abandoned due to disillusionment with the realities of shock therapy and Westernization.

In the mid-1990s, President Boris Yeltsin called for the definition of the ‘Russian Idea’ only to abandon the project once it became clear that nobody could agree what it was. The 1993 constitution forbade the country from having an official ideology (a rule designed to prevent a situation of ideological conformity such as existed under communism), and so efforts to define the ideological foundations of post-Soviet society came largely to a halt.

Image
Cover of the report “A Living Idea – Russia’s Dream. The Russian’s Code in the 21st Century. The Ideological Foundation of the Russian State-Civilization”.

From Ideological Flexibility to a Vision of Russia as a Distinct Civilization

For the most part, Yeltsin’s successor, Vladimir Putin, has been happy to keep things that way, preferring ideological flexibility over the constraints of a formal state doctrine. Many conservative intellectuals, however, have long been unhappy with this state of affairs, pointing out that any society, if it is to be stable, has to have a commonly agreed understanding of itself and its core values.

As political tensions with the West have grown, the Russian state has increasingly defined Russia in terms of opposition to the West, and in the last few years as an entirely distinct civilization. But that has raised the questions of what defines Russian civilization and makes it distinct, questions to which the state has no easy answers, due to its lack of clear ideological foundations. The process of defining Russian civilization has therefore acquired a new political importance.

Into this political context, there now steps a new report titled ‘A Living Idea – Russia’s Dream. The Russian’s Code in the 21st Century. The Ideological Foundation of the Russian State-Civilization.’

The report’s primary author is prominent public intellectual Sergei Karaganov, but it is not his work alone. Rather, it is the collective product of numerous individuals from the Council of Foreign and Defence Policy, the Higher School of Economics and its Institute of World Military Economics and Strategy, as well as the journal Russia in Global Affairs.

As such it is perhaps a good reflection of thinking among elements of that part of Russia’s intellectual class that devotes itself to studying foreign and defence policy. Karaganov himself is especially well-known and last year was granted the honour of moderating Putin’s speech to the St Petersburg International Economic Forum. Thus, even if this report does not reflect the views of the entire foreign and defence policy community, it certainly represents those of a well-connected segment of it, and as such is worth paying attention to.

The report’s starting point is that Russia is ‘a unique civilizational formation’ and that like any human society it needs a unifying idea. This cannot be Western liberalism, a philosophy spread ‘by liberal-globalistic elites, striving to strengthen their privileged position and to facilitate their control over the masses.’

Russia, according to the report, needs to develop an alternative, something that it has not yet done. Due to the constitutional prohibition, this cannot be a formal state ideology, but it could instead be designated as ‘Russia’s dream’ and as such play much the same role as an official ideology. This dream is necessary in order ‘to save the human in humans, to protect the Russian civilizational code, and to save the world from global thermonuclear war.

“Russia, claim the authors, is a ‘God-bearing country’ with ‘a mission before God and humanity’.”

Image
Sergei Karaganov (center) moderates Vladimir Putin’s address at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. June 2024. Source: Kremlin.ru

The Ideological Roots of Sergey Karaganov’s Report

The report is largely a modernized version of mid-nineteenth century Slavophilism, with hints of Cosmism and Eurasianism, and occasional lines that could have been written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Ivan Ilyin, or other twentieth century conservative Russian philosophers (see my earlier article in Russia.Post here). There is very little about it that could be said to be intellectually original. One can, for instance, find much the same logic in the writings of Alexander Panarin in the 1990s, such as his book The Russian Alternative. The report is very much part of a Russian tradition.

The Slavophile elements come out strongly in the depiction of the Western world as decadent, materialistic, individualistic, and overly rationalistic, compared to which Russia is portrayed as spiritually oriented, collectivistic, and founded on faith as well as reason. Modern Western civilization, the report says, ‘while making the person’s life more comfortable, destroys many of the functions that make him a person,’ leading to ‘an ever more evident degradation of the person himself.’

Russian philosophy has long been concerned with the issue of what constitutes ‘personhood’ and what makes someone a ‘person’ (the word for which in such philosophical debates was traditionally ‘lichnost’ but in this report for some reason is ‘chelovek’).

The report notes that ‘We are for Personhood (‘Chelovechnost’), true humanism, for preserving the Person in the person, the godly principle in him.’ True personhood relies on connections to God and to the rest of society – ‘a person cannot develop outside the family, society, nature, and country’. With its assaults on religion, the family, patriotism, and so on, Western civilization is thus portrayed as destroying personhood, in contrast to which, Russia, as the defender of religion, family, nation, and so on, is defending what it means to be truly human.

The report is thus in many respects profoundly conservative, although it denies this, saying that the values it promotes are not conservative values but universal human ones. Russia, by promoting these values, is thus defending humanity as a whole, giving Russia a holy global mission, albeit one that is more spiritual than political. Again, this is not exactly novel, but an updated version of the original Slavophilism.

“Russia, in the eyes of the report’s authors, is blessed by God, a fact proven by its recovery from the traumas of the 1990s, a true ‘miracle’ that has ‘only one “scientific” explanation – that God took pity on Russia and forgave her sins’.”

Russia is for Justice Rather than Freedom

In true Slavophile fashion, the authors portray Russia as resting on different spiritual roots than the West, although they differ from the Slavophiles in viewing Russia as a largely Eastern country, thus showing the influence of later Eurasianist ideas.

‘The main external sources of our identity lie in Byzantium and the Great Mongol empire and not in the West’, claims the report. Russia, it says, has a ‘tradition of sobornost’ and obschinnost’, using a couple of rather untranslatable words to indicate a tradition of collectivism in contrast to individualism.

Russians, says the report, are also distinguished from Westerners by their concern for justice rather than freedom, for their concern for peace, and for their use of force only ‘to defeat endless aggressions’ rather than for ‘looting and enrichment.’ Russia is noted also for the importance it assigns to sovereignty and to a strong state, to the principle of statehood [‘gosudarstvennichestvo’]. And finally, Russians are distinguished by their ‘sense of unity with nature’ and their understanding of the ‘active unity of man and nature.’

As previously stated, none of these claims are in any way novel. They are the long standing core of Slavophile, Cosmist, and Eurasianist mythology. They also lack firm evidential basis – the idea that Russians are more collectivist, more at one with nature, and more concerned with justice than their Western counterparts is, for instance, hard to empirically justify.

Nevertheless, the report uses them to derive the essence of the ‘Russian dream’: service of God manifested in service of fellow humans through society, the family, and the state. This has political ramifications, above all the strengthening of the state, something that is necessary not only for Russia, but also for the world as a whole, since the collective problems of humanity, such as climate change, hunger, and poverty, can only be solved by strong states.

‘Оnly a strong state, resting on the support of a strong society’, the report says, can save humanity from the degrading influence of the negative trends of modern civilization, that deprive the person of many of the functions that make him a person. … The state is needed to counteract the previously mentioned tendencies and the efforts of contemporary globalists liberal elites to destroy the person … [and also] to counteract the efforts of liberal imperialist globalist elites to weaken it in order to seize it and impose its dominance.’

Image
Aleksey Khomyakov, 1804-1860, philosopher and co-founder of the Slavophile movement. Source: Wiki Commons

Western liberal democracy in incompatible with this kind of strong state, claims the report. Liberal democracy can function only in conditions of relative peace and stability and is incompatible with Russia’s particular conditions and the increasingly unstable state of the world.

What is needed instead is a ‘leader democracy’ [‘liderskaia demokratiia’], a term that remains frustratingly undefined, but seems to endorse Russia’s current political system. At the same time, though, the authors stress that this ‘leader democracy’, while authoritarian in terms of central government, should allow for local democracy (an idea that again has Slavophile roots as well as appearing in the writings of Alexander Solzhenitsyn), and should guarantee freedom of thought since ‘intellectual, spiritual freedom is the undoubted precondition of a country’s prosperity’.

The latter idea reflects a long-standing Russian philosophical concern with ‘inner freedom’, as found in the writings of such diverse writers as Boris Chicherin, Ivan Ilyin, Nikolai Berdiaev, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and others. The report comments that ‘Combining intellectual freedom, freedom of thought, and political authoritarianism is not simple. But Russian history gives examples.’ Unfortunately, it doesn’t say what those are.

“The question that arises from all this is to what extent these views are shared by anyone outside of the report’s authors and especially by anybody in authority.”

It is difficult to say. One should not assume that just because the authors are well-connected, their opinions reflect those of the people actually running the country. Indeed, if they did, the authors wouldn’t have felt it necessary to publish a report saying all these things.

Clearly, this is an effort to convince the authorities of the need to act in the perceived absence of action. Indeed, at one point the report contains a veiled criticism of President Putin for refusing to challenge the constitutional prohibition of an official ideology and for failing to recognize the need for a national idea.

Putin has often been seen as an ideological balancer. He permits intellectual entrepreneurs such as Karaganov to generate ideas and then co-opts the ones that he finds politically suitable, while at the same time rejecting the ones that he doesn’t and refusing to be limited by the confines of a single ideological system.

This report notes that one of the reasons for the lack of a formal state ideology is the resistance of ‘technocrats’ who still ‘dominate in the leading layer of the state’, and that the Presidential Administration has no department specifically devoted to ideological issues. This raises the possibility that Putin and other high state officials may actually be one of the prime barriers against the adoption of the kind of ideological prescripts put forward in this report. When Putin eventually leaves office (as in due course he must, if only due to death), a turn back towards liberalism might be possible, but if this report is anything to go by, a turn in an even more conservative direction might be every bit as likely.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/08/pau ... onal-idea/

A 'turn back to liberalism' after the Terrible 90s may not sound like a good idea to the majority of Russians. A turn back to socialism, on the other hand...

******

The owner of "Yamal"
August 21, 3:15 PM

Image

Marina Starovoitova is the first female captain of a nuclear icebreaker in history. Now she commands the nuclear icebreaker Yamal (a monster with a displacement of over 23,000 tons). This is real feminism and emancipation, not all this "4th wave intersectional feminism with whining about dickheads on Twitter."

Image

Image

Image

To Marina Starovoitova of the great ocean roads.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10024178.html

Russians are increasingly less interested in real estate in London
August 22, 13:02

Image

Russians are becoming less and less interested in buying property in London

According to Intermark, the number of requests for the purchase of properties here and closed transactions at the end of the first half of the year decreased by 20% compared to the same period in 2024. Tranio indicates that the share of requests for properties in the UK (the capital accounts for 90%) in the overall demand structure was only 0.79% (-33% year-on-year).

Demand for real estate in London is falling due to a major change in tax legislation, as well as difficulties in carrying out a transaction due to sanctions restrictions.

https://t.me/banksta/58189 - zinc

What happened? Did you swallow dust? No one knew that this could happen. "Efficient owners" cannot be wrong.
Apparently, a whole wave of cases with the squeeze out of real estate and assets took its toll. Faith in the "inviolability of private property" has cracked. And even the former governor of Sevastopol with a British passport was sent to the basement. We will have to look for other ways to accumulate funds withdrawn from Russia abroad.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10025844.html

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
The cocaine Fuhrer refused to recognize Russian as an official language in Ukraine.
He also refuses to recognize the lost territories and continues to talk about the need to freeze the LBS and a direct meeting with Putin. In other words, he is doing everything to disrupt any negotiations.

Accordingly, either the US will force him (and above all his sponsors) to be adequate, or the war "to the last Ukrainian" will continue. The Russian Federation is ready for both options. Well, and along the way, we will be able to see how serious Trump is about "ending another war."

***

Colonelcassad
Regarding the cunning attempts to retroactively re-register the remaining territories of Donbass occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to other regions, so as "not to hand them over to Russia later under an agreement."

Russia will certainly take the entire territory of the former Donetsk region along its administrative borders in 2014. Regardless of where it will be re-registered in Kiev. The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly emphasized that Russia is laying claim to the entire Donbass within its administrative borders. The DPR declared independence in 2014 and legally secured its claims to all these territories by referendum. This approach was adopted by Russia when the DPR and LPR reunited with Russia. And Russia will not abandon this approach, regardless of any scribbling and gurgling in the Verkhovna Rada. Everything that is within the borders of Donbass in 2014 will be part of the Russian Federation. Either through diplomacy or by destroying all Ukrainian occupiers on the territory of the DPR.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*******

Russia and India Defend Energy Ties Amid U.S. Tariff War

Image
Subrahmanyam Jaishankar (L) and Sergei Lavrov (R), Aug. 21, 2025. X/ @EconomicTimes

August 21, 2025 Hour: 8:42 am

Foreign ministers Lavrov and Jaishankar highlight cooperation in oil, gas and defense.
On Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar defended energy cooperation between their countries in response to the tariff war triggered by the United States.

“We have achieved good results in cooperation in the hydrocarbon sector and in the supply of Russian oil to the Indian market. We also share a mutual interest in implementing joint projects for energy resource extraction in the Russian Far East and on the Arctic shelf,” Lavrov said.

The strategic partnership with India “is steadily and progressively strengthening. There are promising plans to organize and expand cargo transportation along the Northern Sea Route and much more,” he added, welcoming the solid state of military cooperation between the two countries, including joint exercises.

Jaishankar stressed that the meeting in Moscow took place in a changing geopolitical context and that the goal of both sides is to maximize their “complementarity.”


A day earlier, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov said his country continues to supply oil and petroleum products to India despite U.S. tariffs imposed on the South Asian country.

“We continue to ship fuel, including crude oil and petroleum products, energy and metallurgical coal. We see potential for the export of Russian liquefied natural gas,” he stated during a meeting of the Russian-Indian intergovernmental commission in Moscow.

Since Aug. 7, the United States has raised tariffs on Indian goods by 25% over New Delhi’s energy ties with Moscow. A second round is scheduled to take effect on Aug. 27, pushing the duties up to 50%.

In an effort to mitigate the impact of the sanctions, Russia on Wednesday expressed its willingness to offer India an alternative market for its exports if they are affected by U.S. tariffs.

India’s state-owned refineries resumed purchases of Russian oil in mid-August after a pause caused by the U.S. tariffs. In recent days, Indian companies reportedly bought several cargoes of Urals crude with deliveries scheduled for September and October.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/russia-a ... ariff-war/

******

Declassified notes from Putin’s first presidential summit show parallels with Alaska meeting last week

National Security Archive, 8/21/25

Washington, D.C., August 21, 2025 – Newly declassified notes from Vladimir Putin’s first presidential summit with an American leader reveal some of the constants in the Russian leader’s approach: flattery, banter about sports, appearing to agree while saying nyet, and history lectures, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information lawsuit and published today by the National Security Archive.

The notes written by Strobe Talbott show Putin in his most cooperative and pro-Western period, hoping for full integration of Russia into the European security system and even NATO. Putin emphasizes cooperation on every point, strategic and economic, even when he intends to disagree. Putin is still inexperienced, yet confident and in full command of his brief, freely moving from subject to subject and trying to impress the American president.

The declassified notes published today include extensive color commentary about Putin’s style, psychological assessments of Putin and his rhetorical flourishes, dramatic quotes from Putin about preferring force to negotiations (“giving them what they deserved”), descriptions of Russian motivations and red lines—all the product of close first-hand observation by Strobe Talbott, then deputy secretary of state and fluent in Russian, during the June 2000 summit between Putin and President Bill Clinton at the Kremlin. Talbott was the U.S. notetaker during the three “one-on-ones” (actually 3-on-3 including translators and notetakers) at the 2000 summit, as he had been for most of Clinton’s previous meetings with Yeltsin.

The publication today also includes the formal memorandum of conversation for one of the two plenary sessions during the summit, declassified by the Clinton Presidential Library as the result of a Mandatory Review request by the National Security Archive. Detailed in this memcon is an extraordinary back-and-forth between Putin and Clinton about the possibility of Russia actually joining NATO, a prospect about which Putin says, “I am pleased.”

While the parallels between last week’s Alaska summit and the Moscow summit 25 years ago are not exact, many of the same issues resonate today, although similar detailed notes are unlikely ever to appear from the meeting last week between Putin and President Trump. Putin’s aggressive approach to the Chechen war back then and his endorsement of force over negotiation no doubt rhymes with his current stance on Ukraine, since he was the invader and could stop the war tomorrow if he wanted. The other major subject of the Putin-Clinton conversations—missile defense—remains a front-burner issue today, with President Trump’s newfound interest in building a “Golden Dome” over the U.S.

Read documents here.

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book ... 2db04599a3

Both the Chechen war and operations in Ukraine are considered existential. If you're not 'aggressive' then why even bother?

*****

Leak prevented
August 21, 2025
Rybar

" On Azerbaijani espionage in favor of the so-called Ukraine "

Rufullaev Yadulla Ramiz oglu was detained by FSB officers on the border with Azerbaijan . He tried to take out secret documents and a telephone number of a Russian military-industrial complex employee.

The department reported that Rufullaev acted on the instructions of his brother, who works in the SBU. Earlier, he stole materials from a hiding place in the Kurgan region in order to deliver them to the so-called Ukraine.

The Baku factor in the conflict against Russia has long ceased to be a "shadow". Azerbaijani mercenaries have long been fighting on the side of the Kiev regime , Azerbaijan sends Ukrainians not only humanitarian aid, but also weapons. Now we see direct participation in espionage activities.

At the same time, Russian troops have recently been striking oil and gas facilities in the so-called Ukraine, where Azerbaijani companies do business. And this is logical - the money they earn, among other things, goes to support the Kiev regime and the militants fighting against Russia.

And inside the country, the arrests of leaders of the Azerbaijani diasporas in Chelyabinsk, Yekaterinburg, Voronezh and the Moscow region have shown that ethnic crime is closely linked to Azerbaijan's foreign policy games. The migration environment has also become a convenient ground for espionage, sabotage and influence through shadow business.

The situation with Rufullayev is just one episode in a pressing problem. When the Baku authorities flirt with the so-called Ukraine, and migrants and criminal structures in Russia work for the enemy, ignoring the problem becomes fraught with danger for the country's national security.

The work to suppress the activities of diasporas and limit migration flows must become systemic. Otherwise, hostile activity not only of Azerbaijan, but also of other migrant donor countries will only grow.

https://rybar.ru/utechka-predotvrashhena/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:50 pm

Putin Goes Nuclear--Visits Federal Nuclear Center, All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics
The Center is in the city of Sarov, Nizhny Novgorod Region
Karl Sanchez
Aug 22, 2025

Image

The President viewed an exhibition on scientific and educational infrastructure in cities of special importance. There are several models on the table each of a different city—scientific centers in Sarov, Snezhinsk, Lesnoy, Zheleznogorsk and Obninsk.

As the caption to the above photo implies, Russia is very serious about science and expanding its research centers along with universities and engineering schools. The Kremlin tells us these people helped explain it all to the president:
Explanations were given by the general director of the state corporation Rosatom Alexei Likhachev, First Deputy Head of Rosatom Oleg Shubin, Head of Roscosmos Dmitry Bakanov, Governor of the Kaluga Region Vladislav Shapsha, Director General of the Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russian Research Institute of Technical Physics Mikhail Zheleznov, Rector of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI Vladimir Shevchenko, Deputy Director General of Rosatom Tatyana Terentyeva.
After viewing the presentation Putin had an hour-long interaction with young employees of nuclear industry enterprises.

Image

The usual format of Putin making his opening remarks is followed by an award ceremony presented to the team at the Russian Federal Nuclear Center—the Order "For Valorous Labor," which was given to the state Director of the Nuclear Center Valentin Kostyukov. After the ceremony the interaction begins that will certainly be entertaining and perhaps educational—these sessions usually are:
V. Putin: Dear friends and colleagues!

On August 20, 1945, 80 years ago, a special committee was established in our country to organize work in the field of nuclear energy. In fact, this date marked the birth of the domestic nuclear industry. Taking this opportunity, I would like to once again congratulate you on this anniversary, all those who work in the domestic nuclear industry. This is a significant force, with nearly half a million people involved. How many people are there in total?

A. Likhachev: 420 thousand.

V. Putin: Almost half a million.

A deep bow to the veterans to whom we owe our security, our powerful technological foundation, and, in fact, our independent, sovereign development. With their talent and titanic will, they have created a strong nuclear shield for our country and were the first in the world to make peaceful nuclear energy work for the benefit of our country and all of humanity.

Scientists, workers, and nuclear engineers performed a true feat in the name of their homeland. They ventured into the unknown, risking their lives and health to assemble the first nuclear weapons, and they built nuclear test sites, stations, reactors, icebreakers, and submarines.

The entire country, which had experienced a terrible war, enormous losses, and destruction, was engaged in tremendous work, relying on the scientific, educational, and industrial potential that had been created both in pre-revolutionary Russia and during the Soviet era. Achieving global nuclear parity was a true victory for our entire nation.

We are proud of the scientific triumphs of outstanding physicists such as Igor Kurchatov, Yuliy Khariton, Yakov Zeldovich, Nikolay Semyonov, and Andrei Sakharov, as well as the energy and dedication of the people who launched hundreds of new enterprises, scientific institutes, and design bureaus, forming a unique scientific and industrial complex.

In order to preserve and enhance this great legacy, the state corporation Rosatom was established in 2007. Sergey Vladilenovich [Kiriyenko] was responsible for its creation. Thank you, Sergey Vladilenovich. This decision set a high pace for the development of the domestic nuclear industry in this historical period, in the 21st century. Today, Rosatom is a [the] global leader in the construction of new nuclear power plants, demonstrating the reliability and environmental friendliness of Russian nuclear technologies.

Russian nuclear engineers were the first to put the safest generation III+ reactors into mass production. They are already creating fundamentally new solutions, such as fourth-generation fast neutron power systems with a closed cycle. This will eliminate radioactive waste and significantly increase the potential of nuclear energy.

Thanks to you and your colleagues, Rosatom is at the forefront of creating and implementing advanced technologies and major infrastructure projects, including the Northern Sea Route, which will become part of the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor from St. Petersburg through Murmansk to Vladivostok. In Obninsk, Kaluga Region, the largest European plant for the production of radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis and treatment of complex diseases, including cancer, is under construction.

Quantum computers make it possible to develop new medicines, vaccines, and materials, as well as to quickly process huge amounts of data. Thanks to the efforts of Rosatom, prototypes of such systems with enormous computing capabilities have already been assembled in Russia. These systems will be in high demand for megascience facilities, including those being developed at the National Center for Physics and Mathematics in Sarov. This is a true center for the science of the future, which is being developed by Rosatom.

This forward-looking vector is absolutely accurate and correct. We need to set big goals for ourselves and strive to make a significant step forward in the development of our economy and the entire civilization.

This is primarily about the work in the field of controlled thermonuclear fusion, which was initiated by the great Evgeny Pavlovich Velikhov. Thanks to the existing foundations, developments in this area are already being used to create a wide range of applied solutions, and Russia is at the forefront of knowledge and technology in this field. These unique advantages must be further developed in close cooperation with Russia's leading scientific centers.

The same kind of fruitful cooperation is necessary within the framework of another large-scale project. I am referring to the creation of a space system with a special power plant and a so-called space tug based on a nuclear installation. Such solutions open up fundamentally new prospects in the exploration of deep space.

In general, such programs are of national, and perhaps, without exaggeration, global significance. Colossal in scale, they are designed to strengthen the country's defense capabilities and sovereignty, and, crucially, to expand opportunities for creativity and self-realization among talented young people, schoolchildren, and students who aspire to work in the nuclear industry.

I am absolutely convinced that the young people, all generations of Rosatom specialists, as well as your great predecessors, are capable of achieving any and all goals, no matter how difficult they may be. This applies to both civilian and defense tasks that involve the potential of Russia's nuclear industry. I would like to reiterate that you have undoubtedly proven this through your outstanding achievements.

Therefore, on the occasion of the industry's anniversary, more than 1,400 Rosatom employees were awarded state awards for their significant contributions to the industry's development.

I would also like to note that a decree has been signed awarding the title of Hero of Labor of the Russian Federation to Viktor Igorevich Ignatov, Director of the Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant, and Andrey Alekseevich Karavaev, a turner at the Chepetsk Mechanical Plant.

Today, I will be pleased to present the Order of Valorous Labor, which was awarded to the staff of the Russian Federal Nuclear Center, the All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics, where we are currently located.

I would like to once again congratulate all the employees and veterans of Rosatom on this holiday, which is so important for all of us and for our country. Let me wish you new successes. Thank you.

(Award ceremony.)

V. Kostyukov: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

On behalf of the team and on behalf of all the residents of Sarov, we would like to thank you for your high praise of our work.

The scientists and specialists of the Russian Federal Nuclear Center are fully responsible for everything that has been entrusted to us. We will implement everything. Thank you.

A.Likhachev: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, you have been working here on the Nizhny Novgorod land, in Sarov, in the place where the nuclear industry of our country was born 80 years ago, for more than an hour. And we have gathered in the hall not only the young people of the nuclear weapons complex, but also our power engineers, those who are engaged in science, new areas of activity. They are eager, Vladimir Vladimirovich, to ask you questions.

Of course, we've been preparing, but I'd like to say a few words before we begin this very important event.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, thank you very much, thank you for coming.

V. Putin: Please.

May I address the audience directly? They are all intelligent people. Please do not ask me difficult questions.

A. Likhachev: Thank you, Vladimir Vladimirovich.

I won't be forgiven if I don't say a few words. Look, we all appreciate and remember everything down to the day and minute: how you came in March 2000 after the elections, made decisions on the nuclear and weapons complex, the energy sector, gave orders to enterprises, and introduced bonuses for the most important workers. I cannot emphasize enough the decision to establish a state corporation.

A separate topic is our exports. You have not only created a support system, Vladimir Vladimirovich, but you are also the main representative of Rosatom in international negotiations. I have seen this many times. You have made nuclear policy a priority in our foreign policy.

Thank you very much. And thank you for encouraging us with your assignments. We have something that wasn't even available in the great Ministry of Medium Machine Building. Mechanical engineering, the Northern Sea Route, materials science, nuclear medicine, and many other things have made us stronger in recent years, and we hope that they will continue to make our country even stronger.

Thank you very much.

If you don't mind, let's move on to the questions. I imagine that you never need any moderators or intermediaries when talking to the audience. Perhaps you'll allow me to introduce our first participant in the discussion, Vladimir Kryukov, a representative of the peaceful atom. He works at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant. Despite his young age, he has already built four nuclear power plants and is responsible for supplying equipment for the construction of new nuclear power plants.

Please, Volodya.

V. Kryukov: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, good afternoon!

It's a bit of an excitement, as it's not every day that you get the opportunity to meet the head of state and ask them questions directly.

V. Putin: We are fellow countrymen. It's simple!

V. Kryukov: Okay, Vladimir Vladimirovich.

Yes, I started my career at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant, almost from the very beginning of my studies. I started as an economist, and now, as Alexey Evgenievich said, I am the Deputy Head of the Department. Back in 2007, when all of this happened, it was thanks to your decrees that the construction of the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant-2 began, to replace the existing capacity, for which I am also very grateful.

As of today, Rosatom has 35 units and 11 nuclear power plants, and about 20 percent of the country's energy balance. According to the approved master plan, we will have to build 38 nuclear power plants by 2042. This will allow us to achieve a 25 percent share of nuclear energy, in line with your instructions...

V. Putin: In the energy balance.

V. Kryukov: Thank you, Vladimir Vladimirovich. In the energy balance for our country.

This is an ambitious task that inspires our team, because we appreciate your attention to our industry, and that's for sure. Alexey Yevgenyevich has already said this. But there are some aspects, at least in my opinion, that are important in the implementation of major investment projects,such as the construction of nuclear power plants. The first is political will, which we have thanks to your support. The second is money. I was going to ask this question, but I won't, because you've repeatedly spoken about the refinancing rate on television. We're looking forward to its decrease, of course. We understand everything.

And the third aspect is definitely the staff, which you can't do without. But we currently have a shortage of staff, including engineering and construction staff, and there are not enough construction professionals on the construction site in Leningradskaya (the third and fourth blocks).

Is there any possibility of considering a state order for specialized universities in order to increase the number of budget places for the specialties that our nuclear industry needs?

I express my deepest personal respect to you, and I think everyone here does, for your visible and invisible support. I don't think we could have done this without you.

V. Putin: A holy place is never empty.

As for training, this is one of the most important areas in all sectors of the national economy. In the nuclear industry, there is probably no exception, and the same is happening. However, it is necessary to train personnel almost from kindergarten or school. We need early career guidance. This is exactly what we are doing. Perhaps it is not as effective as we would like, but the efficiency is increasing, and the results are improving. This is evidenced by the fact that this year, a significant number of students have chosen physics, mathematics, chemistry, and biology as their main subjects for the Unified State Exam.

In general, interest in engineering professions is increasing. I just met with the Minister of Science and Education, and my colleagues told me that the number of people applying for engineering and, by the way, teaching degrees has increased significantly in recent years. This is also proof that our work is having a tangible impact. However, it is not enough. We will continue to work on this.

It's strange that there aren't enough builders. I understand when there are a lack of specialists...

A. Likhachev: There is a shortage of construction workers throughout the country. It may not be just a matter of quotas and state assignments for universities, but also of systemic solutions to increase the attractiveness of construction workers, designers, and project managers. As we understand, this shortage will be significant, not only in the nuclear construction industry in the coming years.

V. Putin: Let's talk separately about what the nuclear industry needs.

As for special training, you have a lot of work to do. My colleagues have just told me that a whole international center has been established in Obninsk, where both our students and foreign students are studying. There are more than 90 supporting universities, right?

A. Likhachev: Yes. We have more than 50 universities in Russia, and several dozen more abroad, partner universities.

V. Putin: These are all people who are coming to the nuclear industry and will work there. It is probably necessary to come back to this again and again.

You know, I've already mentioned this, but it's definitely necessary to promote engineering activities in your field, as well as work in the nuclear industry. I believe that there is nothing more interesting than what you do. I'm not exaggerating when I say this. It's a unique job that involves understanding Einstein's thoughts and the structure of the world. When asked why he became interested in this field, Einstein replied, "I was curious about how the world works." This curiosity led him to explore the atomic structure and beyond. You are engaged in precisely this type of work. What could be more interesting? What could be more exciting than this kind of activity? You need to be able to present it in a beautiful way and interest young boys and girls from school.

And at school, we are now developing a whole system of working with gifted children. And of course, you should have gifted people first of all, which requires special intellectual qualities. And in general professions, such as construction, it is a very noble industry.

If Rosatom has any special tasks or special requirements, let's think about it and maybe have a conversation. I don't want to delve into what's missing in the construction sector and how or who is filling the jobs there, as it's a separate topic. We need to train our own people now.

A.Likhachev: We have some ideas. We'll bring them to you, okay?

V. Putin: Okay.

A.Likhachev: Yes. Good. Thank you very much.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, of course, there were a lot of questions from the international dimension. First of all, this concerns us. Thanks to your support, we are prominent players in the global market, and we are leaders in the nuclear market. We have a corresponding structure, which can be described as the Russian Atomic Trade Mission, operating in many countries and on all continents. Egor Kvyatkovsky, a young man, has already reached the position of Deputy Chief Atomic Trade Representative.

Come on, Egor, ask your questions, please.

E. Kvyatkovsky: Alexey Evgenievich, thank you very much for the introduction. After such words, I don't think it's a boring question—only a bold one should be asked.

V. Putin: Let's do it.

E. Kvyatkovsky: Vladimir Vladimirovich, I am such a non-classical nuclear engineer, I graduated from the Higher School of Economics and decided to break the stereotype that only technical professions take root in Rosatom. I have been working in the industry for 15 years and promoting Russian nuclear technologies abroad.

Indeed, you correctly noted what we are building today. We are building 22 blocks abroad, and today we have 41 blocks abroad in our portfolio. Very serious figures, we went to them, we go, we execute. Of course, so objectively, after 2022, we refocused, we began to engage very actively in friendly countries, the countries of the Global South, ASEAN, BRICS. In our opinion, it is these countries that are making a huge leap forward in terms of energy consumption in the world, and we see a promising future there. At the same time, we are not abandoning or leaving the Western markets that we used to work in and are currently working in. This requires a lot of effort and is challenging, as we are being pushed out of these markets. We see the policies being imposed on our partners, which objectively threaten our ability to work with them. Nevertheless, we continue to fight for these markets and are not backing down. And of course, I can't help but ask: how can we continue to build the right relationship with the Western world?

We are all nuclear engineers, and we have been following the course of your negotiations with Donald Trump. This is important to us, especially in the international segment. Of course, we, and I personally, would like to know: do you think, Vladimir Vladimirovich, that we should continue to fight for Western clients? Or should we wait for common sense to prevail over political games, while continuing to work constructively with our partners? And overall, where will relations with the United States go? I think that everyone in this room is very interested in this issue. Will we be able to build some kind of constructive, pragmatic cooperation with our Western partners? Thank you.

V. Putin: You said that since the start of the special military operation, we have been building more relations with our partners in friendly countries. We used to work there before. To be honest, have we lost any projects from so-called unfriendly countries?

By the way, we don't have any unfriendly countries; we have unfriendly elites in some countries. And I assure you we have nothing to do with the people of those countries. Of course, propaganda is working there, they're brainwashing people and saying that we started the war, but they forget that they started the war in 2014 when they used tanks and aircraft against the civilians of Donbas. That's when the war began, and we're doing everything we can to end it.

But I'm not talking about that now, but about the fact that where was the main cooperation between us? With friendly countries. Where were our main orders placed? In the People's Republic of China, in India, in Bangladesh, in Turkey, a project appeared, despite the beginning of the Free Trade Zone, and this, by the way, is a NATO country. What is missing from what we had? Finland only. We in Hungary even continue to work (a NATO country and a country of the European Union). First.

Second. We continue to do what we used to do in the countries that you called unfriendly. We still supply nuclear fuel in decent volumes. Do we provide services? We provide services in almost the same volumes. There are some new developments, especially in the field of nuclear medicine and other related areas. This is still the case.

Yes, some things really do cause damage to us, where cooperation stops, especially in science, but work with scientists continues. Look, I came to Gatchina, you know, there is a center there. Specialists from European countries work there, and everything is fine. These specialists from countries with which we have had different relations at different historical stages, they have always worked with us, even when they were creating the atomic bomb. Well, we know very well, I won't go into details now, but many of the specialists who worked in the main office in the United States also collaborated with Russia. They weren't just ordinary spies in the traditional sense. They weren't spies at all. They were just smart people who understood that in order to protect humanity from the genie they were releasing, they needed to create a balance. They did this by helping our scientists work as well. Our people would have done it without this support, but they did it on purpose, and both the German and American specialists did it.

And this community of smart people has never been destroyed, and it will never be destroyed. Science, like sports and art, is meant to bring people together. It has always been this way. I am 100% certain that it will always be this way, and no one will be able to destroy this scientific community.

As for purely pragmatic business-related issues, we have enough orders. We are the number one company in the world today. Rosatom is the absolute leader in global nuclear energy. No other company in the world builds as many facilities in general or as many facilities abroad.

I just said this from the podium, and it speaks to the quality of Rosatom's projects. It speaks to their safety and environmental friendliness. And there's another important aspect: we don't put our partners on the hook to build something and then create a market for them, keeping that market under our control. Instead, we create an industry, train personnel, and provide opportunities for equipment production and localization.

You know, the specialists from our partner countries understand this, and they highly appreciate it, which is why the management of Rosatom is able to build such kind, friendly, and long-term relations. I am confident that this will continue.

And those who somehow leave the stage of our interaction as a result of political pressure, I am sure, they will return. And many, I repeat, are working now, and many will return.

As for our relations with the United States, they have been at an extremely low level since the end of World War II, as I have said many times. However, with the arrival of President Trump, I believe that there is a glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel. We have had a very good, meaningful, and frank meeting in Alaska. Our ministries, agencies, and companies are continuing to engage in dialogue. I am hopeful that these initial steps are the beginning of a full-scale restoration of our relations. But it doesn't depend on us; it depends primarily on our Western partners in the broad sense of the word, because the United States is also bound by certain obligations within various alliances, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Therefore, the next steps depend on the leadership of the United States. I am confident that the leadership qualities of the current President, President Trump, are a good guarantee that relations will be restored. I hope that the pace of our joint work on this platform will continue.

A. Likhachev: Thank you very much.

In the international aspect, not only business and commercial projects are very important. Humanitarian cooperation is also very important, and we are actively engaged in it, including within the Academy.

Alexander Kormishin, the director of this center, would also like to ask a related question.

A. Kormishin: Alexey Evgenievich, thank you.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, I graduated from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, and as a student, I became very interested in the BRICS, Youth, and Energy link. Over the past 10 years and seven youth energy summits, we have managed to build an entire dimension of youth energy cooperation among the BRICS countries.

It is important to note here that young foreigners see Russia as a global technological and energy leader. I would like to take this unique opportunity to thank you, as it was during Russia's chairmanship in 2020 that the countries of the Union, represented by their leaders, supported youth energy cooperation and have continued to do so. This is a significant support for the entire team.

And all this experience is reflected in my current work at Rosatom. I am promoting Russian nuclear energy technologies among young foreigners and young leaders. We assure you that we are working hard to attract foreign talent. The Obninsk Tech project is an example of how we are bringing young and talented allies of the Russian nuclear industry together with Rosatom.

In September, as part of the Global Nuclear Summit, we will host 100 of the best young nuclear industry representatives from around the world, from about 40 countries. And we plan to discuss global challenges on the horizon of 2050.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, I have a question: what are the most pressing challenges that you would identify? What challenges should we pay attention to as young people? And if possible, what would you recommend to us, the young people who are working with young foreign leaders today?

V. Putin: I think that you can already recommend anything to anyone. As for the challenges, you know, the essence of the challenges has not changed over the centuries. For a country like ours, the ability to maintain its sovereignty is extremely important, simply the most important. There are countries that can exist without sovereignty. Today, Western Europe has almost no sovereignty. There are many other countries that are doing well. Russia cannot. With the loss of sovereignty, Russia will cease to exist in its current form, and this is absolutely certain. In order to ensure our sovereignty, guarantee our existence, and ensure our development, we need to overcome the challenges that time presents.

At the time, we were talking about the technological breakthrough in the Soviet Union, which was actually associated with two projects: the atomic project and the missile project. This led to a massive collaboration within the Soviet Union, with science expanding in various fields. As a result, we established a nuclear shield and a missile shield. This shield provided protection for the entire country, its economy, and social infrastructure, ensuring its continued existence and progress.

And what are the challenges today? Artificial intelligence. Just imagine: new technologies based on artificial intelligence, genetics, and other areas, which you know better than I do, will determine not only the efficiency of the economy, but also the development of defense, science, and everything else. However, these areas are interconnected. The efficiency of the economy, and thus the country's defense capabilities, as well as biology in a broad sense, will depend on this. We must focus our attention and efforts on this, as well as our administrative resources and financial capabilities. This is what education should be focused on. These are the challenges we face.

You know, I don't want to go back to the same point all the time, but it's the most painful one for us. This is all that happens on the line of contact. I have just spoken with your own Rosatom employees, who took part in the fighting, fought heroically, and some of them were seriously injured. What do I want to say? Every month, I say without exaggeration, and even six months for sure, the conditions and methods of conducting an armed struggle change. It is only necessary to fall behind for a few weeks, and losses increase sharply or the dynamics of progress on the contact line decreases. A few months is enough, and that's it.

I won't talk about the significance of various weapons, what is effective, when and how armored vehicles, artillery, drones, unmanned aircraft, unmanned boats, and so on were used. But they are thinking about it every day. The effectiveness of using one weapon today is decreasing. Why? Because the other side has understood what we are doing and has made appropriate technological decisions within a few weeks. The effectiveness of using modern weapons is rapidly declining. We have people who are engaged, thinking, making decisions, and the efficiency increases to 80-85 percent. This happens every day. Do you understand?

We need to set up the whole society to do what needs to be done. We all need to live in an intellectual environment of science and education. I'm not saying anything new. Everyone who feels comfortable in this environment needs to set themselves up to learn always, constantly, every day. These are the challenges we face and will continue to face. We need to understand and recognize this.

But it's also very important to realize that we can overcome all these challenges, and we will.

A.Likhachev: Vladimir Vladimirovich, let me return to our national agenda. Just one day ago, we held a gala event dedicated to the 80th anniversary, and we presented a captain's certificate to Marina Starovoitova, our employee, making her the first female captain of an atomic icebreaker. This became the global news of the day, as it marked the first time in history that a woman became the captain of an atomic icebreaker.

Here are the girls from Atomflot, who are just a few steps away from this position. In particular, Nina Vdovina, the second assistant captain, is exactly two steps away from this high rank.

Nina, please ask your question.

N. Vdovina: Thank you very much.

The nuclear industry is breaking not only the ice, it is also breaking the stereotypes. I am from a hereditary family of sailors. My great-grandfather, grandfather and mother worked at sea. Now my brother and I are continuing the maritime dynasty, and I am very proud of the fact that I work in the world's only nuclear icebreaker fleet.

I have a question about global logistics. You have consistently made the following decisions: you have appointed Rosatom as the operator of the Northern Sea Route to ensure navigation and the construction of Arctic infrastructure, and you have also transferred FESCO, the country's oldest shipping company with experience in Arctic navigation, to Rosatom.

Also, in March 2025, you instructed the Government, together with Rosatom, to develop a new route, the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor. Of course, we understand the scale and scope of this task. It inspires us all, especially the young people who come and work on it, including people like us. Girls also come there. I have been helping to develop the Northern Sea Route for six years.

I would like to hear, Vladimir Vladimirovich, why the Northern Sea Route is important to you.

V. Putin: It's not important to me, but it's important to our country. It's been developing in the Soviet Union and Russia for a long time. Since when, Alexey?

A. Likhachev: We've been here since 2018.

V. Putin: No, when did the Soviet Union start talking about this?

A. Likhachev: The Soviet Union began, well, from the very first days of the Soviet Union, Arctic expeditions were organized.

V. Putin: Yes, that's right, of course. At that time, the Northern Sea Route didn't sound like that, it was just being studied, and it might not have had any practical significance at the time. However, there were already discussions about the possibility of traveling from Arkhangelsk and Murmansk to our eastern borders. Last year, we transported...

A. Likhachev: 38 million tons.

V. Putin: Almost 39.

A. Likhachev: No, 37.8.

V. Putin: Well, almost 38 million tons, but still a multiple increase. And in connection with climate change, as you know, everyone is already talking about it, there is reason to believe, so let's say cautiously, that the volume of transportation can and will increase dramatically due to the increase in navigation. But even if this does not happen, and we have such an icebreaker fleet that we are planning – we have eight nuclear icebreakers, no other country in the world has such a fleet, and we are planning to build four more in the near future, I think…

A. Likhachev: We already have one on the water, one on the slipway, the decision on two has almost been made, and the fifth, the Leader, is under construction.

Vladimir Putin: In my opinion, now together with the "Leader" four. He is [A .Likhachev] is already casting the bait for another one. Well, okay. In any case, they are needed, it is definitely obvious. If we still have such a fleet, and it will definitely remain, we still have 35 diesel icebreakers, in my opinion. No one has such a powerful fleet. And the most acceptable route so far lies in our territorial waters, or in our special economic zone. So, these are our competitive advantages. And of course, it would be foolish of us not to develop this route, because many countries around the world are interested in using it. It's clear that it significantly reduces the time it takes to transport goods from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean and throughout the Asia-Pacific region, which is developing at an unprecedented pace for the Western community. Of course, we will do this without a doubt.

Among other things, it should be understood that there is no secret here, and the issues of Russia’s defense capability are also largely related to research and the use of northern latitudes. Well, there is nothing secret here, I can tell you. Our strategic nuclear submarines navigate beneath the ice of the Arctic Ocean and disappear from radar screens. This is our military advantage. Research in this area is crucial for us.

And finally, in addition to transport logistics and defense capabilities, there is a third factor. The Arctic region is home to vast reserves of mineral resources. We have already started working in this area, and several of our companies, including Novatek, a major player in the natural gas liquefaction industry, are actively engaged. They are working in collaboration with various partners, both European and Asian. By the way, we are also discussing with our American partners the possibility of working together in this area, not only in our Arctic zone, but also in Alaska. Moreover, no one else has the technologies we possess, and this is of interest to our partners, including those in the United States.

So, this is the Arctic zone and the Northern Sea Route, and your work there has great prospects and is developing very well. I wish you success.

I'm looking at you, and I'm wondering what you do. You're the second assistant captain. It's crazy. I thought you were a student at school, but you're the second assistant captain.

I wish you every success.

A. Likhachev: Thank you very much.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, we know that this event is not the end of your program in Sarov, and there will certainly be more business in Moscow. Vladimir Vladimirovich, can I ask you one or two more questions?

V. Putin: Three.

A. Likhachev: Three. Okay. Good.

Then a question to the youngest participant, he is still half a student, his last name is Kuznetsov, his first name is Vladimir Vladimirovich. He is the leader of the "SSR" – the Community of Rosatom Students, but he is already an employee of the state corporation. He was elected alternatively at a large conference.

Volodya, come on.

V. Kuznetsov: Good afternoon, Vladimir Vladimirovich!

I am currently enrolled in the master's program at the Moscow Power Engineering Institute and am already working at NIKIET, a nuclear weapons complex enterprise.

Two years ago, Alexey Evgenievich proposed the creation of the Rosatom Student Council. Since then, we have grown into a community. Currently, our community includes students from all over the country. Recently, we held a major conference in Moscow, where we gathered as a team to discuss the future of our students. Our goal is to help them discover their talents and find a meaningful purpose in life.

I also have my own dreams, which are, first of all, to be useful to my country. And secondly, to create a large, strong family.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, I think many people will be interested to know, so please tell us, what are your dreams?

V.Putin: About making sure that you succeed. This is my job, my goal.

A. Likhachev: We can't help but return to the family of nuclear scientists. The Kursk region, the city of Kurchatov, and the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant have been in the headlines this year. I would like to give the floor to Yegor Petrov, one of the hereditary leaders of the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant.

E. Petrov: Alexey Evgenievich, thank you.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, good afternoon! I am indeed a hereditary power engineer, a hereditary nuclear engineer. My grandfather worked at the Kostroma Thermal Power Plant, my father works in the nuclear industry, and my younger brother works at a nuclear power plant. After graduating from the Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, I immediately started working at a nuclear power plant. Now, my son is 11 years old. I ask him, "What do you want to do?" He says, "I want to work at a nuclear power plant like my grandfather and father." Time will tell, but let's just say there's a good chance of continuing the family dynasty.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, you were in Kursk not so long ago. You know that we are actively building the first unit of the Kursk NPP-2.

V. Putin: It's impressive, to be honest.

E. Petrov: I think that I will not exaggerate if I say that the first unit of the Kursk NPP-2 was being constructed and continues to be constructed, put into operation in unique conditions. In the sense that, probably, there were no other power units in Russia, in the world, and, God willing, there will be no other power units that would be constructed in the conditions of the hostilities in the territory of the region.

I want to say that I am extremely proud of the team that is working on the construction of this power unit. I am talking about the builders, the operators, and the staff of the operating and under-construction stations, because these people did not flinch or step back in the face of danger. They continued to work calmly in their positions.

And now I can confidently say that we will have a launch on the first power unit this year. We plan to make an energy launch by the end of the year. We are also completing the main stage of construction work on the second unit.

Moreover, Rosatom has started implementing a project to build the third and fourth units at the Kursk NPP-2, which will result in the Kursk Region becoming home to Russia's largest nuclear power plant with an installed capacity of 4.8 gigawatts.

In this regard, Vladimir Vladimirovich, it is not even a question, but a request to consider the possibility of partial distribution of electricity, taking into account the new capacities, in favor of the introduction and development of new industrial capacities in the Kursk Region.

Thank you.

V.Putin: I think that this is quite logical and should be done. I am sure that the Kursk region, as well as what has been damaged in other border regions, will be restored. And we will, of course, pay attention to the development of both small and medium-sized businesses and large enterprises.

The government is currently preparing a programme for the restoration of everything that has been lost and damaged in all the border regions: Kursk, Bryansk, and Belgorod. This programme will be implemented. As you know, we are helping people who are currently unable to return to their homes due to the mined territory. Active work is currently underway in this area. We also want to create favourable and attractive conditions for economic activity. Naturally, we will consider using some of the energy from the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant.

And in general, do you know what is happening now? We have in previous years, in 10 years, the growth rate of use, of electricity consumption was approximately 1.3 percent, and last year–-more than 3 percent increased.

A. Likhachev: By more than 3 percent, in my opinion.

V.Putin: Yes, more than 3 percent. There was a 1.3 percent growth, and now it's over 3 percent, which means that the rate of electricity consumption in the country has increased by more than two times. This is a good indicator, of course, for the Kursk region and for the entire border region. We will create the necessary conditions for development. One of these conditions is, of course, reliable electricity supply. We will definitely consider using energy from the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant. Thank you.

A. Likhachev: Vladimir Vladimirovich, I cannot help but add that the employees of our Kursk station not only managed the existing facilities systematically, but also did not reduce the pace of construction. Our builders provided significant assistance in strengthening the defense capabilities of the Kursk region.

V. Putin: I know, the director told me.

A.Likhachev: Yes, [Alexander] Khinshtein and I are currently working very actively on this issue.

V. Putin: I know, the director told me.

A. Likhachev: They're great guys, of course.

V.Putin: Your specialists worked despite the fact that the fighting was nearby, and some of Rosatom's employees fought, even getting seriously wounded. I have just spoken with them. Rosatom holds a strong, reliable, and very honorable place in all the life-support systems of the Russian state.

Thank you very much.

A.Likhachev: Vladimir Vladimirovich, probably, and by the law of the genre, should sum up, ask the last question, say the last words our official youth leader, the chairman of our great youth council Maria Zotova. She is a native of Sarov, so, probably, all the stars converged here, Masha, on you.

M. Zotova: Hello, Vladimir Vladimirovich!

Thank you, Alexey Yevgenyevich.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, I'm a third-generation nuclear engineer, and I was born in Sarov. My parents worked at the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Physics. However, I never dreamed of pursuing a career in nuclear engineering; instead, I aspired to become a ballerina, which I pursued for six years.

V. Putin: You look like a ballerina.

M. Zotova: Thank you.

My family's total experience in the industry is 72 years. My grandfather was a liquidator at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, and my father was a test pilot. This, of course, shifted the focus from ballet to my return to Rosatom. However, I haven't lost my sense of rhythm, as I spent 14 years working at the Afrikantov Design Bureau, designing RITM-200 reactor units, which are the heart of the icebreaker that Nina sails on.

To be honest, all the work, both youth work and professional work, has made me think about the fact that the main idea for which nuclear scientists work has always been very important. And over the 80 years that we have been working, we have gone through different stages, and of course, the first main idea for us, for our young scientists, for Khariton and Flerov, was to preserve peace on this earth.

Then Igor Vasilyevich Kurchatov gave us the main idea when he said that the atom should be a worker, not a soldier.

Then there were difficult times, although I was very young when the perestroika years were, but our enterprises, it was a very difficult time for people, because there were no orders, no salaries, in Sarov it was so difficult that sometimes there were no products. And our young parents, my own, coped with it. The dedication and loyalty to the cause, which I think every nuclear engineer is famous for, and in this hall as well, allowed them to stay and preserve this industry.

In 2007, you gave us a new idea: to become a global technological leader. Now, we, the young people, are wondering what the main idea for the nuclear industry is for the next period.

V.Putin: The nuclear industry remains one of the most important areas of our activity. And these areas are well known to you: defence, science, education, and energy. And the area is expanding to include related fields where these unique knowledge and technologies can be applied. I have already said, and you know this better than anyone else, that healthcare and other areas, as well as materials science, are all important.

You know, it seems to me that the most important achievement is not even a specific industry, although each of them is of great value, but the fact that we have created industries of knowledge, production, and technology, which are one of the foundations of the very existence of the Russian state at this stage of our development. And this creation began 80 years ago, and we have come a long way in this development, and we have achieved unique results, which I would like to congratulate you on. I wish you new successes.

Thank you very much.

A. Likhachev: Thank you very much.

Colleagues, just for a moment, for ten seconds. We all understand, or rather, we all feel, how much responsibility Vladimir Vladimirovich is carrying right now, how busy he is, how enormous his workload is. You came to visit us for the whole day, you devoted your time to us. So thank you very much. We will not let you down. Thank you.

V. Putin: Thank you very much.
Gee, how many want to work for Rosatom? A new technology that gets very litte print or other notice is quantum computing which Putin noted is also on the list of tech things Rosatom’s involved with. Also unmentioned aside for the shipyard now doing the work are the new ice-class container and other ship types being built specifically for the Northern Sea Route. But if you want or have kin that want to be scientists or hi-tech builders, Russia’s the hot spot to learn and build a career. There are no such opportunities in the West on the scale that exists in Russia. And who can resist Putin’s selling the world of science—Don’t you want to learn how it all works?

Putin also spoke forcefully about the reality of the current geopolitical and conflictual situation in which Russia finds itself. There are several emphasized segments that would be noted in publications, in particular Putin’s words about sovereignty. Recall my recent article about that topic and how Putin reinforced its premise. This remark, however, was probably the most important:

Moreover, no one else has the technologies we possess….

That’s so very true in the ways that matter most.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/putin-go ... ts-federal

******

Yeltsin Center begins to be held accountable
August 22, 7:00 PM

Image

Minor progress in the Yeltsin Center. Following a request from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the deputy director of the Yeltsin Center with an Israeli passport was fined 45,000 rubles for discrediting the Russian Armed Forces. She passed the minimum.

The Yeltsin Center has begun to be held accountable

Following a parliamentary inquiry from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the leadership of the Yeltsin Center began to be held accountable.

It became known recently that a court in Yekaterinburg found the deputy director of the Yeltsin Center, Lyudmila Telen, guilty ( https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/24831865 ) of discrediting the Russian Armed Forces and imposed a fine of ₽45,000. According to the case materials, on February 25, 2022, she published an "anti-war post" by Tatyana Yumasheva, the granddaughter of the first president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin.

The Communist Party of the Russian Federation consistently opposes the glorification of the Yeltsin period of our country ( https://t.me/redparfenov/5651 ), especially in the difficult modern conditions. Today, when the country has found itself involved in a serious international confrontation, largely dealing with the consequences of the criminal collapse of the USSR, the rejection of socialism, as well as the destruction and plunder of public property carried out during the reign of Boris Yeltsin, the existence and development of "Yeltsin Centers" in our country seems not just strange, but also frankly destructive. In recent years alone, the communists have held many actions ( https://t.me/redparfenov/5651 ) against the activities of the EC.

Moreover, representatives of the "Yeltsin Center" do not hesitate at all today to openly speak out with a systematic anti-Russian, anti-historical and anti-Soviet agenda.

In May 2025, in connection with the developing situation, I sent a parliamentary inquiry ( https://t.me/redparfenov/5563 ) to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation.

In particular, I pointed out the participation of a representative of a foundation associated with the Memorial organization, recognized by the court as an extremist organization, in an event dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Victory. There, formulations were voiced that directly contradict the historical truth and current legislation. Links were given to specific fragments of speeches posted in the public domain on Telegram and VK Video — the case materials were transferred to the Verkh-Isetsky District Court of Yekaterinburg. Thus, our position was specifically confirmed by the actions of the law enforcement system.

As a result, today we can confidently state that we have achieved recognition by the Russian judicial system of the violation of the law by representatives of the Yeltsin Center ( https://www.rbc.ru/politics/20/08/2025/ ... cdee7d6fc9 ).

This is the first, but not the last step. Such structures, if they are engaged in distorting historical facts, must bear responsibility for this - not only moral, but also administrative, even criminal. No "cultural mission" can cover up ideological sabotage.

For us, communists, this is not a fight against any individual "museums" or exhibitions - this is a fight for historical truth, for the honor of the Soviet soldier, for the people's right to know their real history, and not one rewritten according to class-hostile and Western patterns. The USSR defeated fascism. The Soviet people saved Europe. Soviet socialism gave the country many gigantic socio-economic and scientific-technical achievements. And if someone, using institutional wrapping, tries to slander these truths today - we will not remain silent.

There should be no place for the Yeltsin Center in Russia! ( https://kprf.ru/actions/kprf/219451.html )

https://t.me/redparfenov/5859 - zinc

Good, but not enough. A fine of 45,000 for an Israeli citizen is nothing. The subversive activities of the "Yeltsin Center" continue anyway.
In this case, joint efforts of both communists and non-communists are needed to speed up the closure of this bedbug infestation.

And in general, it seems strange that people with passports of other countries occupy socially significant positions in our country.

P.S. The Yeltsin Center should certainly be closed. And sooner or later we will see it. Like with the closure of Memorial, Novaya Gazeta, Ekho Moskvy and other trash.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10026719.html

Political scientist Markov recognized as a foreign agent
August 23, 16:59

Image

Political scientist Markov has been declared a foreign agent

Political scientist Sergei Markov, whom the Ministry of Justice today added to the list of foreign agents, said that he was added there by mistake and that he is Putin's man, whom he has supported for 25 years. Markov considers his inclusion on this list unjustified.

The Ministry of Justice reports that the reason for adding political scientist Markov to the register of foreign agents is his participation in the creation and dissemination of messages and materials of foreign agents and organizations whose activities are considered undesirable in the Russian Federation.

As I understand it, this is part of the same story as the expulsion of Gusman from official media. Apparently, the event where Gusman and Markov spoke on the topic of Azerbaijan had an effect. The crisis turned out to be systemic, and not a temporary fluctuation. And using the stories of Gusman and Markov as an example, the state is sending an unambiguous signal.

The bite with Azerbaijan is serious and the peak has not yet arrived (the main wave of greetings to Aliyev is expected in the fall). Our state is very slow to harness, but when this bulldozer starts moving, it is better not to get in its way.

I can assume that in the near future we will see new attacks on Azerbaijani assets in Ukraine, arrests of Azerbaijani criminals and a limitation of the influence of Azerbaijani diasporas in Russia (according to the Georgian scheme of the late 2000s).

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10028296.html

Google Translator

******

You May Ask How?

How those damn Russkies do what they do. Well, here is your answer (part of it) by the Man himself.

В России уже созданы квантовые компьютеры с огромными вычислительными возможностями. Об этом заявил президент Владимир Путин на встрече с физиками-ядерщиками и специалистами атомной отрасли в Сарове. Трансляцию ведет Кремль. 22 августа глава государства прибыл в закрытый город Нижегородской области, где расположен Всероссийский НИИ экспериментальной физики – Российский федеральный ядерный центр. В ходе визита Путин также почтил память Юлия Харитона – одного из создателей советского атомного проекта и первого научного руководителя ядерного центра. Президент возложил цветы к памятнику ученого и опустился на одно колено перед его бюстом.

Translation: Quantum computers with enormous computing capabilities have already been created in Russia. This was announced by President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with nuclear physicists and specialists in the nuclear industry in Sarov. The broadcast is being conducted by the Kremlin. On August 22, the head of state arrived in the closed city of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, where the All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics – the Russian Federal Nuclear Center – is located. During the visit, Putin also honored the memory of Yuli Khariton, one of the creators of the Soviet atomic project and the first scientific director of the nuclear center. The president laid flowers at the scientist’s monument and knelt down on one knee in front of his bust.

That also explains some things related to the Update I gave today. (Video at link.)

And why things happen the way they do. Russia is celebrating the 80th Anniversary of nuclear age in USSR/Russia and creation of a monster of corporation Rosatom.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/08 ... k-how.html

******

Russia Requests Urgent UN Security Council Meeting on Nord Stream Blasts

Image
Aerial view of the Nord Stream pipeline explosion. X/ @France24_en

August 23, 2025 Hour: 8:20 am

Moscow draws attention to the ‘protracted and non-transparent’ nature of Germany’s investigation into the blasts.
On Friday, Russia requested an urgent meeting of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions, following the arrest of a Ukrainian suspect in Italy.

Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s first deputy permanent representative to the UN, said that the meeting will take place on Aug. 26 at 4:00 p.m. EST (2000 GMT) under the presidency of Panama.

He said Moscow will draw attention to the “protracted and non-transparent” nature of Germany’s investigation into the blasts.

German prosecutors said the Ukrainian national, identified as Serhii K., was detained Thursday in Italy at Germany’s request. He is suspected of being part of a group that planted explosive devices on Nord Stream pipelines, and allegedly served as one of the coordinators of the operation.


The text reads, “They blew up Nord Stream for you. Now they sell you their gas, twice as expensive. And you thank them. This is more than an alliance; it’s an economic surrender. The EU no longer trades; it obeys.”

Serhii K. has reportedly denied any involvement, saying he was in Ukraine at the time of the incident, and refused voluntary extradition to Germany, where he could face up to 15 years in prison if convicted.

On Sept. 26, 2022, unprecedented explosions caused severe damage to the Nord Stream pipelines, including three of the four lines of Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2, the latter of which had not been put into operation.

Russian officials have repeatedly asserted that the sabotage was carried out with U.S. support. The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office has opened a criminal case, classifying the incident as an act of international terrorism.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/russia-r ... am-blasts/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 25, 2025 3:15 pm

Brian McDonald: Putin’s no ideologue: His creed is Russia First
August 23, 2025
By Brian McDonald, Substack, 8/21/25

By the time Michael McFaul gets round to flogging his latest volume (Autocrats vs. Democrats), the title alone has already done the heavy lifting for him. It’s the sort of binary that reads well on a publisher’s spring list, even if it crumbles like a cheap biscuit once it meets reality. And his insistence that Vladimir Putin is some kind of messianic ideologue is a fine example of this; neat for a blurb, but hopeless for a diagnosis.

It also confirms the notion that he’s become a Walmart Anne Applebaum. A cheap tribute act to a veteran master of calculated myopia on Moscow and beyond.

If Putin has a guiding star, it isn’t some grand creed stretching from the Neva to the Urals. Rather it’s much simpler, and tougher to blunt: let’s call it Russia first. The rest (Orthodoxy, talk of “values,” the occasional flirt with tradition) is merely paint on the bonnet. Underneath, the engine is all about survival and jockeying for advantage. Of course, there’s an ideological patina; the essays about the ‘Russian world,’ and the talk of civilisational clashes with the West. But these serve more as instruments than ends, leading a vocabulary of legitimacy rather than a vision to die for.

He picked it up in the wreckage of the Soviet Union, as he watched a superpower bleed out with shelves bare, figures fiddled and whole ministries running on lies. And then the humiliation of its grandees or their families heading west with their bags packed. The truth was hammered home: any faith that leaves your own pensioners hungry while you keep Cuba on the drip is a form of suicide.

And he saw the other imperial capital crack too, with misguided adventures in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan leaving Washington’s sermons of democracy turned to rubble. Of course, hubris can rot a state faster than any tank battalion.

When Joe Biden decided to hold his grand “Summit for Democracy” in 2021 and pointedly left out allies like Hungary, Putin will have seen it for what it was: an attempt to sort the world into neat ideological blocs, as if Orban in Budapest and Merkel in Berlin were playing the same sport. The Soviet Union long tried that sort of categorisation; and it didn’t end well.

Some Western pundits like to believe that Putin’s sudden turn after 2011, with a choke on the media after Dmitry Medvedev’s relatively freewheeling interlude and the lurch into family-values sermonising, was the blossoming of some long-hidden conviction. In truth, it looked more like a counter-insurgency kit cobbled together on the run, and meant to be a hard break with Vladislav Surkov’s theatre-state. Bolotnaya Square had filled with the largest crowds Moscow had seen since the nineties, and the Kremlin didn’t read them as citizens finding their voice but as Washington dusting off its colour-revolution manual. Hillary Clinton was at State, Obama in the White House, and on the stage were Alexey Navalny, once a nationalist outflanking Putin from the right, and Garry Kasparov, both lifting their lines from the Merkel-Obama hymn book. Even the pampered darlings of state TV, Ksenia Sobchak and Vladimir Pozner among them, drifted into the square for a cameo, as if to remind the Kremlin how thin the loyalty could be once the crowd began to roar.

Two years later came the Kiev Maidan, which followed the Orange Revolution in 2004, and the Rose in Georgia a year earlier. Each one, at least in Moscow’s telling, was carried on the shoulders of Western-funded NGOs and political fixers flown in from abroad and it hardly escaped the Kremlin’s notice that the US media quickly tried to label Bolotnaya the ‘Snow revolution.” For a government paranoid about systemic security, after the turmoil of the 20th century, the signal was blunt enough: liberalism wasn’t just another faction inside the house; it had turned into a breach in the wall. The conservative turn allowed Putin to brand these forces as alien to Russia, even treacherous… people willing to sell the country to the West for a place at someone else’s table.

All the talk of birth rates and “non-traditional propaganda” were just fronts, handy covers for something plainer: bolting the ideological doors before another colour revolution tried to walk through them.

If Putin were the stiff ideologue those playing to the gallery keep sketching, the guest list would be much tidier than the far from smooth reality. What you see is a patchwork quilt pulled from every conceivable ragged corner. You’ve got Belarus the hard dictatorship stitched beside Kyrgyzstan, which is half a democracy and half a shambles. On the friends side of the ledger can be found North Korea and China propped up on one flank, with Israel and Brazil grinning from the other. One week the Kremlin is bowing to Gulf monarchs, the next it’s raising toasts with Latin leftists. And India is nearer now than it’s ever been, regardless of the fact it’s the world’s largest democracy. No gospel binds that mess together and it looks more like the hand of a 19th-century statesman marooned in a nuclear age, playing the cards as they tumble, and not caring a damn if they match.

This is why the “Cold War” frame continues to mislead. Moscow isn’t selling its dogma like the Comintern once did and it doesn’t need converts. All the Kremlin really wants is space to breathe at home and partners it can count on abroad. Some will say this pragmatism is a liturgy in its own right, and you could call it the playbook of survival. Maybe they’re right, but it’s a far cry from the holy mission McFaul tries to hang on Putin.

Of course, you can throw sanctions at Moscow and lock it out of SWIFT, and cut it off from capital markets, but there’s no Warsaw Pact to dismantle and no utopian Soviet dream to unpick.

The trouble with McFaul’s reading, and with much of the Western mind in policy circles, is the hunger to hammer Russia into a single mould. First comes the Cold War script: Moscow cast again as the ideological foe and its principles written off as incompatible with ours. Then, after 1991, it switches to the transition-state tale: Russia as a misfiring liberal project that can be nudged back onto the “right” path. Now, in McFaul’s telling, it’s back to the first version, only painted with 21st-century anxieties about “illiberal nationalism.”

McFaul’s Autocrats vs. Democrats might sell because it flatters liberals’ need for a morality tale. But morality tales are for children and think-tank panels. Putin doesn’t view his mission as being about converting you, nor is he concerned with saving your soul. Instead, he believes he’s here to make sure Russia survives, and even thrives, on terms you may not like. That’s his ideology.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/08/bri ... sia-first/

******

Totally failed, totally
August 23, 2025
Rybar

" How the protest at the Russian base in Armenia ended "

The anti-Russian rally announced with great fanfare at the 102nd military base in Gyumri, organized by a minor provocateur and leader of the pro-Western party “For the Republic,” completely failed, and with a bang.

Although a lot of time and large funding by local standards were spent on preparation , as many as 32 people came to the protest. In fact, the grants went to the circus with shouts of "fascists", demonstration of the middle finger and the Ukrainian flag.

At the same time, the counter-action of the Mother Armenia movement in defense of Armenian-Russian relations, which was held shortly before the rally, acquired almost greater scope.

What the members of "Mother Armenia" reminded about
The movement's statement states that under another government, the existence of such anti-Armenian forces and the Turkish "fifth column" in the Armenian political field would have been impossible. However, under the current government, all of this is only encouraged.

They also recalled that after the surrender of Karabakh and the Zangezur corridor, the opponents of the Armenians will do everything possible to withdraw the 102nd military base.

As we expected, there was not enough crowd among the residents of Gyumri to protest against the Russian base. Despite all the events, the presence of the Russian Armed Forces contingent ensures the security of Armenia within its borders.

At the same time, even the lack of broad public support will not prevent the Armenian authorities from continuing information attacks on the 102nd base - the interests of the ruling circles in Yerevan have long had nothing in common with the Armenian ones.

https://rybar.ru/polnostyu-provalilsya-polnostyu/

Google Translator

******

Lavrov on negotiations with Ukraine
August 24, 21:08

Image

Lavrov on negotiations with Ukraine

The meeting between Putin and Zelensky was not discussed in Alaska, the topic was raised later, "one might say impromptu";

Putin clearly told Trump in a telephone conversation that Russia is ready to continue direct negotiations with Kiev, which began in Istanbul;

The delegations of Russia and Ukraine "have met and will meet" in Istanbul;

Zelensky "is playing without caring about the content" when he talks about the priority of his meeting with Putin;

Russia proposed raising the level of delegations in Istanbul to discuss issues that need to be brought to the attention of Putin and Zelensky;

The presence of capital by any country in weapons-producing enterprises in Ukraine does not give them immunity;

Russia recognizes Zelensky as the "de facto head of the regime" and is ready to meet with him in this capacity, but according to the constitution, he is illegitimate;

The West is ready to send occupation forces to Ukraine to contain Russia;

A "consensus that takes into account Russia's basic interests" is needed on security guarantees around the Ukrainian settlement;

Putin and Trump want to achieve peace in Ukraine, and the actions of European politicians show that they do not want this.

Ukraine has the right to exist, provided that it "lets go" of people who decided in referendums that they belong to the Russian culture.

We were born in the Soviet Union. Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that those who do not regret the collapse of the USSR have no heart. But those who want to restore it have no head. This is an absolutely true statement.

Russia has never and under no circumstances deliberately chosen targets not related to the Ukrainian military. There are plenty of facts of targeted attacks by Kiev on civilian targets, Russia informs the world community about this.

P.S. In general, direct negotiations between Putin and Zelensky are expected to be absent before any agreements are reached.
The Russian Federation will also not agree to "guarantee" options that threaten its interests.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10030869.html

Good Cop Bad Cop Tactics
August 24, 19:20

Image

Good Cop, Bad Cop Tactics

Washington Plays Good Cop, Bad Cop: Maximum Pressure on Russia Instead of Real Negotiations

A recent interview ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbIXK9bKN3g ) with former CIA special operations officer Mike Baker, who led operations in Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the post-Soviet space, clearly shows the current US position on the negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

During the interview, Baker ( https://wwsg.com/speakers/mike-baker/ ) said that over the past month, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have disabled 22% of Russia's energy infrastructure. In his opinion, this is a significant achievement that should be complemented by secondary sanctions against the main buyers of Russian oil - China and India. At the same time, he expressed doubts about imposing sanctions against China during the ongoing trade negotiations, while the American administration is more decisive regarding India.

These statements reveal Washington's true strategy: the goal is not to find compromise solutions between the parties to the conflict, but to create maximum pressure on Russia in order to force it to accept extremely unfavorable conditions. This explains the regular bellicose statements by the Ukrainian leadership and the "cocaine coalition."

All other rhetoric is a classic "good cop, bad cop" tactic — an attempt to persuade Russia to accept the most unfavorable conditions for it through alternating harsh pressure and pseudo-diplomatic initiatives.

The Iranian precedent serves as a good example of such a strategy: the strike on Iran was carried out precisely at the time of active negotiations with the United States, in which the key role was played by Special Envoy Steven Witkoff — the same diplomat who is now overseeing negotiations with Russia.


https://t.me/darpaandcia - zinc

As has been said many times, the sincerity of the Trump administration will be tested on the issue of forcing Ukraine and NATO to peace. Everything else is just empty words, which cover up the desire to impose conditions of temporary peace in Ukraine that are unfavorable for the Russian Federation.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10030665.html

Soviet patriotism is to blame for the surrender of Karabakh
August 24, 11:33

Image

Yesterday Pashinyan told a story about how he surrendered Karabakh and part of the territory of Armenia "because of the USSR."

"The model of patriotism that the Soviet Union created for us, Armenians, expressed the ambitions of this state - the USSR, which won the Second World War and entered into confrontation with the North Atlantic Alliance, in the south-western direction. On the other hand, this model was called upon to ensure the export of patriotic ideas that existed in the Armenian SSR beyond the territory of the republic.
This ideology was introduced for decades through books, films, theatrical performances and "it was precisely the socio-psychological model formed in this way that led to the Karabakh movement. "We were all carriers of that socio-psychological model formed by the USSR, which in the 90s was passed on to the generations formed in the Republic of Armenia, and the deep, subconscious goal of this socio-psychological model was the strategic impossibility of the existence of an independent Armenian state, because a country with a total conflict subtext cannot build genuine independence" (c) Pashinyan

The USSR was wrong, the generations were wrong, but if we surrender the territories, allow ethnocide in Artsakh - now everything will immediately get better. Pashinyan's model, of course, does not imply any patriotism (neither Soviet nor bourgeois) in principle. This is simply the Armenian version of "Kozyrevshchina", which we observed in Russia in the 90s. Also under the sauce of "a break with the damned Soviet past."

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10029577.html

Stole 1 billion during the construction of fortifications in the Belgorod region
August 25, 15:07

Image

Today, Vladimir Bazarov, Acting Deputy Governor of Kursk Oblast, was arrested.
He is accused of stealing 1 billion rubles during his time in Belgorod Oblast during the construction of fortifications in Belgorod Oblast.

There have been previous arrests in Bryansk and Belgorod Oblasts in cases related to theft during the construction of fortifications. These cases organically complemented the arrest campaign in Kursk Oblast (where the governor was arrested, and the ex-governor, in the position of Minister of the Russian Government, shot himself).

Apparently, these cases are far from over and we may see new arrests of those involved in theft during the construction of fortifications.

Stealing from the army during war is not good.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10032226.html

Markaryan was detained
August 25, 8:50

Image

Briefly about the Markaryan case.

1. The blogger has spoken up for several articles (extremism, propaganda and rehabilitation of Nazism, etc.)
2. The blogger thought that this would be forgotten and decided to return to Russia with pathos. It is already clear at this stage that this character is not very smart.
3. A day after his return, he is taken into custody under the above-mentioned articles, in particular for insulting Alexander Matrosov.
4. The blogger pretends not to understand why he was taken into custody and why they want to put him in jail. Apparently, he did not agree on his return in advance, as was the case with Sobolev, who publicly repented so that he would be allowed to come to Russia and not put in jail. Markaryan did not do this, so the consequences for him are not surprising.
5. I would not be surprised if he is demonstratively closed, so that his example will show what happens when bloggers ignore current legislation and the "informal procedures" for returning to Russia.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10031360.html

Google Translator

******

RUSSIAN HONOUR DOESN’T TAKE A VACATION IN AUGUST

Image

On August 24, 1991, Marshal Sergei Fyodorovich Akhromeyev committed suicide. He had returned from his holiday at Sochi responding to the attempted removal of Mikhail Gorbachev from power. According to the reports of the time, he hanged himself in his Kremlin office, leaving behind a note. One version of what it said was: “I cannot live when my fatherland is dying and everything that has been the meaning of my life is crumbling. Age and the life that I have lived give me the right to step out of this life. I struggled until the end.”

https://johnhelmer.net/russian-honour-d ... august-11/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 26, 2025 3:20 pm

Lavrov on Meet the Press
Karl Sanchez
Aug 25, 2025

Image

Those who watch the Sunday Propaganda Shows on US BigLie Media were treated to an interrogation of Mr. Lavrov. I caught a little portion provided by RT after my traveling last night. The verbal sparring displayed was entertaining. What follows is the Russian Foreign Ministry’s transcript of the 54-minute event:
Question: Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, welcome to the Meet the Press programme.

Sergey Lavrov: Thank you. Welcome to meet with Russian diplomats.

Question: Thank you very much for finding time for us after such an important week. I will immediately ask a question about the state of these negotiations. Is President Vladimir Putin going to hold a one-on-one meeting with Vladimir Zelensky?

Sergey Lavrov: These rumours are being circulated, first of all, by Vladimir Zelensky himself and his European sponsors. In Anchorage, this was not discussed. The issue was raised later, one might say impromptu, following a meeting in Washington between US President Donald Trump and his guests. After that, US President Donald Trump made a phone call to President Vladimir Putin. The President of our country has clearly stated that we are ready to continue the direct Russian-Ukrainian negotiations that began in Istanbul. Three rounds have already taken place. Vladimir Putin noted that high-level meetings, especially between the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, should be very well worked out. Therefore, a preparatory process agreed between the parties is necessary.

To this end, we proposed raising the level of the delegations that have met and will meet in Istanbul to discuss specific issues that need to be brought to the attention of President of Russia Vladimir Putin and Vladimir Zelensky. These issues are of a humanitarian, military and political nature. Last time, when our delegations met in Istanbul, we proposed the creation of three working groups, including on political issues. More than a month has passed, and there is no response from the Ukrainian side.

When Vladimir Zelensky says that his meeting with President of Russia Vladimir Putin is a priority, he is essentially acting, and he is very good at acting, because he loves theatricality in everything and does not care about the content. It is no coincidence that the Ukrainians and Europeans who came to the meeting in Washington are now trying to distort what was discussed in Anchorage between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, especially regarding security guarantees.

Yesterday and today, I read Bloomberg materials that say that negotiations between the United States and Russia on security guarantees for Ukraine were actually torpedoed because of Moscow's demands to include the principle of indivisibility of security. This is an eloquent statement. The principle of indivisibility of security is enshrined in many documents adopted by consensus, in particular, at the OSCE summits in Istanbul in 1999 and in Astana in 2010. NATO is doing the exact opposite.

So, when we are accused of undermining the negotiation process between the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine by drawing attention to the principle of indivisible security, it means that these people recognize that they want security to be "divisible," so that the security offered to Ukraine (which is being discussed now) is built against Russia. These discussions, which took place yesterday and earlier (after the meeting in Washington), clearly signal that these people consider security only as security for Ukraine and they are ready to send occupation forces to Ukrainian territory to contain Russia. They do not hide the fact that this is the goal. This is not the way to act in this situation.

President of Russia Vladimir Putin and President of the United States Donald Trump discussed security guarantees in Anchorage. The Russian leader recalled that in April 2022 in Istanbul, during the negotiations initiated by the Ukrainian side (shortly after we launched a special military operation), the Ukrainian delegation presented draft principles for reaching agreements to end the war. They were initialed by both delegations. As for security guarantees for Ukraine, these principles (I would like to emphasise once again, proposed by the Ukrainian delegation) provided for the creation of a "group of guarantor countries" that would include the permanent members of the UN Security Council (Russia, the United States, China, the United Kingdom and France), Germany, Turkey and any other country that would be interested in joining this group. They would guarantee the security of Ukraine, which should be non-nuclear, neutral and not part of any military bloc.

Question: Mr Foreign Minister, we will talk more about security guarantees, and we will have a long discussion on this topic. I just want to stick to my question and discuss the topic of a one-on-one meeting between President of Russia Vladimir Putin and Vladimir Zelensky. It was not only Vladimir Zelensky who spoke about it. The White House reported that President of Russia Vladimir Putin told US President Donald Trump that he was ready to meet face to face with Vladimir Zelensky. How can you say that you are serious about the peace process if you cannot tell me directly whether President Putin is ready to meet with Vladimir Zelensky? Is this the plan?

Sergey Lavrov: I hope that those who are interested in the situation around Ukraine are following President Putin's statements, especially when they try to see some violations on our part. President of Russia Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet with Vladimir Zelensky.

On August 21, at a news conference after my meeting with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, I reiterated that he was ready to meet with Vladimir Zelensky if this meeting really led to something. We do not consider it expedient to meet so that Vladimir Zelensky has another opportunity to be in the spotlight. We are not against him playing games and putting on various shows, but this will not solve the problem, because Vladimir Zelensky has publicly stated that he is not going to discuss any territories, thereby challenging US President Donald Trump and other American colleagues, who have said that the territorial issue should be the subject of negotiations. He clearly stated that no one can forbid him to join NATO, which again completely contradicts the words of President Donald Trump. There were other moments as well. He also claimed that he was not going to restore the rights of the Russian-speaking population and repeal the laws adopted since 2019, long before the special military operation. The Ukrainian parliament adopted a number of laws banning the Russian language, destroying Russian culture, education, media in Russian and the canonical UOC. He said that he did not care about what you said there and what, in the opinion of US President Donald Trump, should be part of the solution, but he was ready to meet. And for what?

So, if we're all focused on some imaginary effect, it's not diplomacy, it's usually showmen who are happy to do that. Repeat. President of Russia Vladimir Putin has clearly stated that he is ready for the meeting, provided that it really has a presidential agenda.

Question: But this is all a big "if." A meeting is not scheduled, Mr Minister? Is everything in question?

Sergey Lavrov: Kristen, I'm sorry, but you're not listening. The meeting is not planned, I do not dispute this. But, it seems to me, you cannot understand what I am talking about. President of Russia Vladimir Putin is ready to meet with Vladimir Zelensky when the summit agenda is ready. And she is not ready at all.

After Anchorage, US President Donald Trump proposed several points that we share. On some of them, we have agreed to show some flexibility. When US President Donald Trump presented these issues at a meeting with Vladimir Zelensky in Washington, which was attended by his European sponsors, he clearly pointed out to everyone that there are several principles that, according to Washington's position, should be accepted, including Ukraine's non-accession to NATO and the discussion of territorial issues. Vladimir Zelensky said to all this: "No." He even said no, as I have already mentioned, about the abolition of the laws banning the Russian language.

How can you meet with a person who claims to be the leader of a country–-the only one on Earth where language is banned? Not to mention the fact that Russian is one of the official languages of the UN. In Israel, the Arabic language is not prohibited. In Palestine and other Arab countries, Hebrew is not prohibited. But Ukraine is doing everything it considers necessary to promote the Russophobic and Nazi agenda. And Western countries, which are usually crazy about human rights when they discuss anything anywhere regarding Ukraine, especially after the coup d'état in 2014, have never used the word "human rights."

So, yes, President of Russia Vladimir Putin is ready to meet with him. But no, we can't meet just to take a picture and give him the opportunity to say that he is legitimate. After all, legitimacy is a separate topic. Regardless of when this meeting may take place (and it must be well prepared), the question of who will sign the document from the Ukrainian side is very important.

Question: Don't you think that Vladimir Zelensky is the legitimate leader of Ukraine? Does Russian President Vladimir Putin not recognise him as the legitimate leader of Ukraine?

Sergey Lavrov: No, we recognise him as the de facto head of the regime. In this capacity, we are ready to meet with him. But do you want to get the whole picture or only the part of it that suits you?

When it comes to signing legal documents, everyone should have a clear understanding that the signatory is legitimate.

According to the Constitution of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky is not one at the moment.

Question: I see. But I note that he is also a democratically elected president. Mr Minister, let's move on. This week, US President Donald Trump told French President Emmanuel Macron: "I think Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to make a deal for me." Is this true? Does President Putin really want to make a deal for US President Donald Trump?

Sergey Lavrov: You know, I would not go into this semantic research. At the invitation of US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited Alaska. They had a very meaningful meeting in Anchorage. They discussed practical steps, not just who would meet whom and how it would be covered. They discussed serious security issues. After all, the violation of Russian interests in the field of security was one of the root causes of everything that happened.

This is due to the lie that has been going on for many years: since 1990, we have been repeatedly promised that NATO would not expand. In the documents of the OSCE summits I have already mentioned, it is written in black and white (and no one has canceled these provisions) that no organization should claim superiority in Europe, and NATO behaves in a diametrically opposite way.

Russia has repeatedly proposed to develop draft security guarantees. In 2008, we proposed signing an agreement between Russia and NATO. They ignored this offer. In 2021, before we had to decide to launch a special military operation, we proposed two treaties: one between Russia and the United States, the other between Russia and NATO. This was also ignored, and in a very arrogant way.

Antony Blinken, who was then US Secretary of State, told me at our meeting in Geneva in January 2022: "Forget about it. We can discuss some restrictions on the supply of weapons that we, the West, will supply to Ukraine. But NATO membership is not being discussed with anyone." To my words that this is a gross violation of the principle of indivisible security, he replied that indivisible security in the OSCE is a political declaration. But the political declaration signed by the leaders is something that must be respected, based on elementary diplomatic and political decency.

Question: Good, Mr Minister. We have a lot of topics to discuss, so I'd like to move on to the next one. This week, Russia struck a U.S.-owned plant near the border with Hungary. I talked to people who, frankly, regard this as a slap in the face to US President Donald Trump and the entire peace process. Don't you think so?

Sergey Lavrov: I would say that those who sincerely want to understand what is happening should already know that Russia has never and under no circumstances deliberately chosen targets that are not related to the Ukrainian military.

Question: But this is an electronics plant, Mr Minister. I talked to those who were directly on the spot. They produce, among other electronics, incl. coffee machines. This is not a military facility.

Sergey Lavrov: I understand that some people are very naïve. When they see a coffee machine "in the window", they think that they are produced here. Our intelligence has reliable information, and we strike only, as I said, either at military enterprises, military facilities, or at industrial enterprises directly involved in the production of weapons for the Ukrainian army.

On the contrary, I do not recall that the Western media expressed any concern about the actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, when, for example, a year ago, they invaded the Kursk region, where there are no military targets at all. All the objects that they strike daily are civilians. They, by the way, took civilians hostage there who had nothing to do with the conflict.

Recently, they made a third attempt to blow up the Crimean bridge. A few days ago, they attacked another nuclear power plant. Earlier, they attacked the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant more than once. Now the Smolensk nuclear power plant was attacked. They continue to carry out terrorist attacks. There is no other way to call it.

But if you seriously believe that the presence of American, Hungarian or whoever capital in an enterprise that produces weapons to kill Russians gives immunity to those who create weapons to kill us, I do not think so and do not consider this approach fair. I would call it the imperialist approach.

Question: Mr Minister, just to be clear: do you confirm that Russia did deliberately strike at an enterprise owned by the Americans?

Sergey Lavrov: You should work as a professor in Soviet universities, so curiously you distorted what I said.

I did not say that I confirm what you said. I have not heard anything about such an episode. I only asked a rhetorical question. Do you really think that if there is an enterprise that produces weapons and is part of the Ukrainian military machine, whose goal is to produce what is used to kill Russian citizens, then the mere presence of a share of American capital in this enterprise should confer immunity on it? That was my question. I haven't heard anything about this episode. If you can send me links to the relevant information, I will study it.

Question: Good, Mr Minister. US President Donald Trump says that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to put an end to the war. But if you are serious about peace, why not stop dropping bombs and agree to a ceasefire, as President Trump is calling for?

Sergey Lavrov: We are coming back to the same thing again. We are dropping bombs on facilities that are directly involved in building up the Ukrainian military machine aimed at killing Russian civilians and continuing the war started by the Ukrainians, instigated by the Biden administration, and by the Europeans, those who supported the 2014 coup d'état and then did everything to turn Ukraine into an instrument to contain Russia.

A few years ago, they officially stated that Ukraine was a tool for inflicting a "strategic defeat" on the Russian Federation.

I give examples of how we act. We have repeatedly said: if you provide us with evidence that our actions were indiscriminate and we hit some civilian object that is not related to the military machine of Ukraine, we are ready to consider it. There are plenty of facts of targeted strikes by the Ukrainian side on civilian targets. This information is available and we disseminate it to the international community.

Question: Mr Minister, here are the facts. About 50,000 civilians have been killed or injured in this conflict. So either the Russian military is very bad at aiming, or you are purposefully hitting civilian targets. Which of these options is correct?

Sergey Lavrov: Listen, NBC is a very respected organisation, and I hope you are responsible for the words you broadcast. I ask you to send us or make public the information to which you have just referred. Because we have never set ourselves the goal of civilian objects of the kind that you have mentioned. You may be confused in the information, since it is a well-known fact that a lot of churches, as well as many residential, civilian areas, were purposefully shelled by the Kiev regime.

Question: But what about Russia's actions, Mr Minister?

Sergey Lavrov: We are going around in circles. I have already told you what we have repeatedly stressed: we never target civilian targets and only strike at targets directly linked to the Ukrainian military machine, which the West is trying to strengthen.

If you have any evidence of what you have just said about churches, kindergartens, etc., I urge you to make it public. Publish them with dates, addresses, and everything else.

As I said, NBC is a reputable broadcaster. Your audience deserves to receive specific information when you make such claims.

Question: Let me repeat. I only said that all information is in the public domain. We have reporters on the ground who have seen these strikes with their own eyes. I would like, however, to move on and talk about security guarantees. You raised this topic this week. In today's interview, you also said that Russia should have the right to reject any security guarantees for Ukraine. The Europeans say that this does not concern you.

Sergey Lavrov: Kristen, please don't play Zelensky. Be an honest journalist. I've never said that.

Question: Why should a country that is bombing Ukraine be responsible for Ukraine's security?

Sergey Lavrov: Why should these be the countries that have prepared an anti-Russian coup d'état in Ukraine and pumped Ukraine with modern weapons for attacks on our territory? Countries that support the Nazi regime, which prohibits human rights that they are obliged to observe under the UN Charter and numerous conventions? Why should we endure all this? I explain to you, I have never said that Russia should have the right to veto security guarantees. But there must be a consensus on security guarantees that takes into account the basic interests of Russia.

Let me remind you that in April 2022, the Ukrainian side was satisfied with submitting a document that could put an end to this war. It began with a statement that Ukraine would be a neutral, non-aligned, nuclear-free country. By the way, this statement on the renunciation of nuclear weapons, non-participation in military blocs and the preservation of neutral status was the basis of the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine in 1990.

It is because of this statement that Ukraine will never be a member of NATO, that it will never have nuclear weapons and that it will be neutral, that it was recognized as an independent state.

If you think that it is natural and normal to exclude Russia from discussing security issues on its borders, then there is something wrong with the philosophy of your channel.

Question: Answer yes or no, are you talking about Russian servicemen on the ground?

Sergey Lavrov: Where?

Question: In Ukraine, in this region.

Sergey Lavrov: No, Russian troops are on this land because this territory has been turned into a stronghold for inflicting a "strategic defeat" on the Russian Federation.

Russian troops on this land are not for the sake of the territory itself, but to ensure that weapons capable of reaching Russian territory are never deployed on it.

Russian troops are on this land because ethnic Russians and Russian-speaking peoples have lived there for centuries. In fact, they initially mastered it, historically developed Russian culture, language and respected Russian history.

When, after a bloody and unconstitutional coup, all this was banned, we had no choice but to protect these people from the openly Nazi regime. There is plenty of evidence that this regime is Nazi. I hope that one day your correspondents will be able to come and see what is happening with the glorification of war criminals, Hitler's collaborators, etc.

Question: US President Donald Trump has been in office for seven months now. During this time, the number of attacks on Ukraine has doubled. President of Russia Vladimir Putin claims that the war would not have started under Donald Trump. If this is so, then why does it worsen with him?

Sergey Lavrov: Listen, it is becoming a tradition for some TV channels to simplify the situation. When US President Donald Trump said that there would have been no war if he had been president then, in my opinion, this means that the Americans would not have prepared, financed and organised a coup d'état aimed at overthrowing the legitimate president of Ukraine in February 2014. Germany, France, Poland, etc., the next morning the opposition violated it.

The agreement was to form a government of national unity and hold early elections. And the legitimate president agreed to this. The opposition signed it. The European Union has guaranteed this. And the next morning there is a coup. Instead of a government of national unity, the opposition announced that they had created a government of "winners". Have you heard about it? I don't think so. Immediately, when they seized all government buildings, they announced that the first thing they would do was to abolish the status of the Russian language. They sent militants to storm the building of the Supreme Council of Crimea. And that's how it all began.

Therefore, I do not think that US President Donald Trump, with his slogan "Return America to its former greatness" and focused on the national interests of the United States and common sense, would ever get involved in the preparation of a coup against the legitimate president in any country, including Ukraine.

I am answering your question why we believe that US President Donald Trump would have avoided this situation. I have already answered you.

Question: But I want to ask about what is happening on the ground right now. The number of attacks on Ukraine has doubled since US President Donald Trump took office. If President of Russia Vladimir Putin respects Donald Trump so much, why is he taking actions that undermine his desire for peace?

Sergey Lavrov: President of Russia Vladimir Putin respects US President Donald Trump. He respects President Donald Trump's attention to the national interests of the United States and is focused on protecting the interests, well-being and historical heritage of the American people.

I have no doubt that President Trump respects President Vladimir Putin's attitude to protecting Russia's national interests and the fundamental interests of Russian citizens, including the right to be a nation with a rich history and traditions, and which, if you will, has a duty to support those who share the values of the Russian language and, if you like, the Russian world.

When the United States launched a military attack on Nicaragua or another Central American country in the last century because one of the journalists, an American citizen, was physically attacked. This has never raised any questions in the American media.

We are there defending millions of ethnic Russians and Russian-speaking people who wanted to be citizens of Ukraine, but the putschists who came to power in Ukraine declared them "terrorists".

Long before the special military operation, Vladimir Zelensky said in an interview with a Western media outlet that those who are fighting the regime, those who decided after the coup that the regime does not represent their interests, are not people, but "individuals." He also said that if, those people say, living in Ukraine, you belong to Russian culture and history, then for the sake of the future of your children and grandchildren, go to Russia. Is this "democracy" supported by the Americans?

Question: Allow me to ask you a question about what President of Russia Vladimir Putin said in June of this year. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours." Does President Vladimir Putin believe that Ukraine has the right to exist?

Sergey Lavrov: This is not true. Ukraine has the right to exist on the condition that it "releases" people. People whom they call "terrorists", "individuals" who, in several referendums in Novorossiya, in Donbass, in Crimea, decided that they belong to Russian culture. And the government, which came to power as a result of a coup, set itself the primary task of destroying everything Russian.

Question: But we also know that some of these people did not want a Russian invasion. Mr Minister, do you admit that Russia has invaded Ukraine?

Sergey Lavrov: Democracy is when people have the opportunity to vote. People voted, expressed their opinion.

Question: Mr Minister, has Russia invaded Ukraine?

Sergey Lavrov: Russia has launched a special military operation to protect people whom Vladimir Zelensky and his predecessor did not consider people. They called them "creatures", "individuals". You should think about it.

I understand that you need to sell something today. But if you raise and touch on such serious topics, I recommend that you study the history of Ukraine's existence after the 2014 coup.

Question: But this is a yes or no question, Mr Minister. Do you admit that Russia has invaded Ukraine?

Sergey Lavrov: I have already told you that we have launched a special military operation to protect people who have been declared "terrorists" and enemies by the regime and whom it has bombed.

To the question of facts. You asked me about the temples, etc., that Russia allegedly bombed. This is a very straightforward approach, the simplest in the world. I will ask you as a journalist: do you have professional pride?

In April 2022, when the agreement was being negotiated in Istanbul, but the British and the Biden administration forbade the Kiev regime to approve the agreement, an incident occurred in the town of Bucha, located near Kiev.

Then, as a gesture of goodwill for the sake of concluding the agreement I mentioned, Russia withdrew its troops from this part of Ukrainian territory, after which the settlement of Bucha came under the control of the Ukrainian authorities. The mayor of Bucha said on TV how good it was that they returned to their city again. And two days later, the BBC team showed footage of the main street with dozens of bodies lying in some strange order. The West immediately blamed Russia and introduced a new package of sanctions.

Three and a half years later, we still have not received any response to our official request to share information about what really happened there.

And so I publicly appeal to NBC. Having repeatedly visited New York at sessions of the UN General Assembly, I met with media representatives, including NBC correspondents, and said that the incident in Bucha was used for anti-Russian escalation.

We appealed to the UN Secretary-General, the OSCE and other organisations to make public the names of the people whose bodies were shown on the BBC. In response, there was silence.

Then, in 2023 and 2024, at my press conferences in New York, I addressed correspondents at the UN: journalists are usually very pushy people. They want to get to the bottom of the facts. I asked: can they start a journalistic investigation and demand that the names of the people whose bodies were shown and broadcast on the BBC be made public? I think it would be interesting for NBC as well.

Question: I understand that there is a lot to be said about history here. I want to discuss what will happen next and how the negotiations are going. According to incoming reports, as part of the peace agreement, Russia demands control over the entire Donbas, although a significant part of it still remains under Ukrainian control, and that Russia wants to freeze the rest of the front line. Are these Russia's demands?

Sergey Lavrov: At meetings with US President Donald Trump and other US officials, we explained the goals of the special military operation. We explained them to everyone publicly, but apparently NBC didn't listen to us carefully.

We have goals and they will be achieved. Namely: to eliminate any threats to Russia's security emanating from the territory of Ukraine, to protect the rights of ethnic Russians and Russian speakers who feel that they belong to Russian culture and history. And the only way to protect them from this Nazi regime is to give them the right to express their will. They did this in 2014 in Crimea, in 2022 in the Donetsk and Lugansk republics, and then in the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. Thus, the goals of the special military operation are being implemented, which are based on compliance with the UN Charter, which does not allow the infringement of any human rights, including linguistic and religious rights, which is completely ignored by the Kiev regime. And, of course, as I have already said, Ukraine must maintain a neutral, non-aligned status and remain a non-nuclear state. These are the foundations of the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine of 1990, thanks to which the recognition of Ukraine as an independent state became possible.

You said that you don't want to go into history. But we do not want to forget history. After all, everything that is happening now has its reasons, rooted in the decades when the West expanded NATO, pushing the alliance close to the Russian borders and made Ukraine a weapon to defeat Russia "on the battlefield".

Question: If we talk about history, Russia was a party to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which guaranteed Ukraine's security. But Russia violated that agreement by invading Ukraine in 2014.

Sergey Lavrov: Have you read the Budapest Memorandum?

Question: Yes.

Sergey Lavrov: What does it say?

Question: This is a security agreement between a number of countries, including Russia and Ukraine, on non-invasion of another country. And that's exactly what you did.

Sergey Lavrov: No. It looks like you haven't read it. The Budapest Memorandum was signed...

Question: Ukraine has renounced nuclear weapons. This was the key provision of the document.

Sergey Lavrov: May I answer you?

Ukraine has renounced nuclear weapons. Quite so. And then the Memorandum guaranteed the security of Ukraine, like any other non-nuclear-weapon state. The legal obligations of the nuclear powers, when they give assurances to non-nuclear countries, are not to attack those countries with nuclear weapons.

We have never signed up to ensure the security of Ukraine after the illegal, bloody coup d'état that brought to power outright Nazis and racists under anti-Russian slogans. They said that they had changed their Constitution. Now it talks about Ukraine's desire to join NATO. In January 2022, Vladimir Zelensky called the renunciation of nuclear weapons a mistake and said that they could think about possessing them again. This is not what we guaranteed in the Budapest Memorandum.

In addition, the Budapest Memorandum was accompanied by a declaration by those who signed it. It said that all participants, including Ukraine, would respect human rights, the OSCE principles of non-aggression, and so on. This was grossly violated by those who came to power in Ukraine in February 2014 with the help of the United States. Former US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland proudly said after the coup that in the end the United States spent $5 billion, but achieved what it wanted. But all this, of course, is history.

Question: Mr Minister, let us be clear: the only concession that Russia is offering is not to invade the rest of Ukraine?

Sergey Lavrov: No. We do not operate with such categories. We are not interested in territories; we have the largest territory on Earth. Unlike those who raise the issue of invasion and seizure of more and more lands, we are concerned about the fate of the people living on these lands, whose ancestors lived there for centuries, founded cities, built factories, ports, and developed agriculture. And these people are now called "strangers".

Question: What about the thousands of people who lived on these lands and died from Russian bombs, Mr Minister?

Sergey Lavrov: I'm sorry, but the primitiveness of your questions... You repeat the same question over and over again. I asked you: please send me a list of these churches and kindergartens. And I will send you information with facts that the Ukrainian army is fighting exclusively with civilians. I have already cited the example of the Kursk region. There are no military facilities there. Or take the terrorist attack on a passenger train. But you never reported it.

Question: Mr Minister, in fact, a lot of this is broadcast on television, and we have reporters on the ground. I will also send you a list. But the bottom line is that the world sees firsthand the loss of life in all these regions captured by Russian troops. We saw it with our own eyes.

Sergey Lavrov: I remember a lot of footage, accompanied by comments, to the effect that Ukrainian civilians were allegedly being attacked by Russia. And then it turned out that this footage was filmed in Iraq ten or twenty years ago.

Therefore, I will ask a question: Do you think that the policy of your channel considers it acceptable in this or that country to eradicate this or that language by legislative means?

Question: Mr Minister, let me ask you. When you landed in Alaska, you were wearing a sweater with the inscription "USSR" on it. So you signaled Russia's desire to restore the Soviet Union?

Sergey Lavrov: No.

We were born in the Soviet Union. President of Russia Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that those who do not regret the collapse of the USSR have no heart. But whoever wants to restore it has no head. This is an absolutely true statement.

We have recognized all the former Soviet republics as independent states. We are developing relations with them as with fully independent states. But when countries like Ukraine begin to physically and legally destroy everything Russian... Imagine that in some other country they ban the English language, American history... But this is not what we are talking about now.

As for the USSR. If you do not remember your roots, if there are no nostalgic memories of childhood, youth, first love, friends, then you are unlikely to really represent humanity and human values.

Remembering and cherishing what has happened in your life over the years is one thing, but trying to take over everything by military means is quite another. It's not the same thing.

Question: Does Russia and President Vladimir Putin want peace?

Sergey Lavrov: Yes.

Question: And what would you say to US lawmakers who believe that you are "leading US President Donald Trump by the nose"? Is this true?

Sergey Lavrov: It is not for the legislators or the media to decide what US President Donald Trump is guided by.

We respect President Donald Trump because he defends America's national interests. I have reason to believe that President Donald Trump respects President Vladimir Putin because he defends Russia's national interests. What they discuss among themselves is no secret. We want peace in Ukraine. US President Donald Trump also wants peace in Ukraine.

The reaction to the Anchorage meeting, the visit of these European representatives to Washington, and their subsequent actions indicate that they do not want peace. They say that they cannot allow the defeat of Ukraine. They cannot allow Russia to win. Here are the categories with which they operate: "victory", "defeat", etc.

We have proposed a diplomatic peace settlement several times. As I have already said, it was not us who disrupted the almost finished agreement back in April 2022, this was done by then British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and a number of officials of the Biden administration, the French and the Germans. We know that. Anything else?

Question: These are all my questions. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, thank you very much for your time.

Sergey Lavrov: Thank you.

Question: I hope next time we will be able to see you in person.

Sergey Lavrov: Come to Moscow, but ask your colleagues to prepare more diverse questions for you.

And one more thing. History is important. It is very tempting to look at the Ukrainian situation through the prism of "cancel culture". We were told: forget about the coup d'état, you must leave Crimea, because, they say, everything began with the annexation of Crimea.

We ask the Westerners: what about the coup d'état, which was carried out contrary to your guarantees? They answer: no, it's all in the past. Let's focus on today, they say. This is a common technique that these people use. "Cancel culture" in modern history is dangerous.
The master diplomat skewered yet another Western Presstitute. Yes, I emphasized a very large portion of Lavrov’s answers. IMO, the most important were what he closed with. As usual, the presstitute wasn’t properly prepared to deal with the master, and of course so much of what she attempted to get Lavrov to admit was based on the West’s BigLie Establishment Narrative. One note about Ukraine’s supposed nuclear weapons: Those were actually Soviet nuclear weapons, not Ukrainian, and the rightful property of the Russian Federation—the Soviet Union’s legal successor. So, Ukraine never was a nuclear weapons state. I found Lavrov saying Trump wouldn’t overthrow another government interesting given what’s happened in Syria, Lebanon, and what’s being threatened against Venezuela. I’m very curious to know how ordinary ignorant Americans understood the exchange, the interrogation since so many lack any sort of basic contextual prior knowledge. IMO, Lavrov was clearly speaking to the American audience at the end when mentioning something they ought to know about—Cancel Culture. I’m also curious to know how much NBC cut from the overall program.

It’s difficult to know how well Lavrov’s continuing reiteration of the Bucha event works with people, although in this instance most of the audience is probably ignorant of that event and was thus informed for the first time. Maybe it’s my issue for having heard it repeated so many times that I doubt its effectiveness. Lavrov, was effective in driving home the root causes point, that his didn’t just emerge out of the blue in 2022. Why Zelensky is merely a performer and not a serious leader that doesn’t meet the proper criteria to solve the issue was also well put. The notion that signed treaties are mere “political declarations” and otherwise meaningless might also shock an audience that sees basic contract law as be inviolable. Law has a purpose, but its legitimacy must be agreed upon otherwise it has no validity. And of course, that’s the basic reason why the USA is the Outlaw US Empire—it refuses to obey the agreed upon laws of Humanity by demanding its might makes right. And although not specifically stated by Lavrov, he said essentially the same thing.

One last observation, the presstitute didn’t try to argue that Ukraine or the Zelensky regime is Nazi or refute what Lavrov said about that six specific times. There were several direct insinuations that the Outlaw US Empire brought to power via its 2014 coup an openly Nazi regime and that over the last eleven years all the governments supporting Ukraine are in fact supporting Nazis and their crimes. I hope all of that was news to the American audience since I’m quite certain they’d never previously heard anything of the sort. And as we know, that’s in no way Russian propaganda as beau coup information exists proving that reality. And Lavrov directly stated Russia’s SMO’s primary aim is to protect Russian speaking Ukrainians who were the immediate targets of the invasion via coup by the Obama administration of the Outlaw US Empire. The factual basis of the preceding sentence is one that’s trying to be canceled by Team Trump and all Western BigLie Media, which is why I push-back as hard as I can against it—it’s akin to covering Hitler’s and Tojo’s WW2 crimes and also covering those by Netanyahu and the Outlaw US Empire’s Terrorist Foreign Legion in West Asia, Africa, and elsewhere.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/lavrov-on-meet-the-press


*****

What kind of society would you like to live in...
August 26, 15:13

Image

44% of Russians want to live under socialism, and only 14% under capitalism. In some other society - 6%. Another 36% were unable to formulate their opinion (as in previous years). Such data were obtained by researchers from the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences as part of the 55th stage of monitoring Russian society, conducted since the 90s.

According to the same survey, the most popular figures among residents of the Russian Federation were Putin, Stalin, Brezhnev and Lenin. In that order.
Stalin has remained the most popular historical figure in Russia since the second half of the 2000s, far ahead of all the others. Both Ilyichs are traditionally in the top five. The SVO and the desire of citizens to see more order and responsibility quite logically only spurred Stalin's popularity, and also sharply increased interest in the mobilization model, which is associated with socialism and Stalin. All this "Bring back SMERSH" is exactly about this.

The right, of course, is pissed off by the "wrong people". But this is state sociology, nothing can be done.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10034345.html

List of items seized from Timur Ivanov
August 26, 8:54

Image

Partial list of items seized from Deputy Defense Minister Timur Ivanov

( https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/70403 ) (deleted small details):

- RUB 281,738,450 in cash.
- $350,354 in cash.
- €191,500 in cash.
- 170 items of jewelry.
- 30 paintings and 10 books of cultural value.
- 26 weapons.
- 44 watches.

- 2. RUB 2,255,982.41 in VTB.
- 3. RUB 134,243.1 in Sberbank.

- A residential building with an area of ​​344.8 sq. m in the village of Arkhangelskoye, Moscow Region, with a cadastral value of RUB 8,805,777.83.
- A residential building with an area of ​​799.7 sq. m in the village of Razdory, Moscow region, with a cadastral value of RUB 31,974,796.04.
- Residential premises with an area of ​​317.2 sq. m on Povarskaya Street in Moscow with a cadastral value of RUB 115,992,956.92.
- Building with an area of ​​2,617 sq. m in the Kalyazinsky District of the Tver Region with a cadastral value of RUB 110,527,975.26.
- Non-residential building with an area of ​​420.1 sq. m in the Kalyazinsky District of the Tver Region with a cadastral value of RUB 3,289,845.03.
- 233,700/4,933,300 shares in the common share right of non-residential premises with an area of ​​32.1 sq. m in 3-y Kadashevsky Lane. Moscow with a cadastral value of RUB 9,312,745.43
- 233,700/4,933,300 shares in the common right of non-residential premises with an area of ​​19.4 sq. m in 3rd Kadashevsky Lane. Moscow with a cadastral value of RUB 4,176,663.64
- 233,700/4,933,300 shares in the common right of non-residential premises with an area of ​​371.3 sq. m in 3rd Kadashevsky Lane. Moscow with a cadastral value of RUB 93,004,211.66
- 233,700/4,933,300 shares in the common right of non-residential premises with an area of ​​38.1 sq. m in 3rd Kadashevsky Lane. Moscow with a cadastral value of RUB 10,940,378.42
- Non-residential premises with an area of ​​233.7 sq. m in 3-y Kadashevsky per. Moskvy with a cadastral value of 102,718,058.17 rubles.
- Premises with an area of ​​646.5 sq. m in Chisty per. Moskvy with a cadastral value of 136,064,814.38 rubles.
- Premises with an area of ​​332 sq. m in Chisty per. Moskvy with a cadastral value of 72,724,663.08 rubles.

- Plot of land with an area of ​​4950+/–25 sq. m in the village of Arkhangelskoye, Moscow region with a cadastral value of 47,276,064 rubles.
- Plot of land with an area of ​​1160+/–8 sq. m in the village of Razdory, Moscow region with a cadastral value of 16,116,703.6 rubles.

- 1939 Opel Admiral worth 6,500,000 rubles.
- 1942 Packard worth 1,900,000 rubles.
- 2004 Bentley Continental GT worth 3,500,000 rubles.
- 2013 Rolls Royce Ghost worth 15,586,333 rubles.
- 2015 Chevrolet Suburban worth 7,000,000 rubles.
- 2020 Mercedes-Benz V220D 4MATIC worth 6,172,000 rubles.
- 2021 Cadillac Escalade worth 9,679,000 rubles.
- 2021 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter worth 3,109,000 rubles.
- 2023 GMC Savana worth 14,900,000 rubles.
- 2023 Chevrolet Express worth 14,600,000 rubles.

- 2013 Harley Davidson FLHХ Street Glide worth 2,200,000 rubles.
- 2017 Harley-Davidson XL1200CX worth 1,170,000 rubles.
- 2018 MV Agusta Brutale 800 dragster RVS 1 worth 2,695,820 rubles.
- 2018 Harley Davidson FLHTCUTG worth 1,800,000 rubles.
- 2018 Honda GL1800 worth 2,500,000 rubles.
- MV Agusta 2019 worth RUB 3,850,000.
- Honda SV 2020 worth RUB 1,074,000.

- Small motor vessel Aluma Storm model 577 worth RUB 3,260,000.

- 50% share in the authorized capital of Agrokompleks Russkoye Selo LLC worth RUB 15,000,000.

The list is incomplete.

https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/71628 - zinc

Not in poverty. But still not enough.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10033475.html

Major General Kuvshinov is accused of stealing 57 million rubles
August 26, 10:44

Image

Major General Kuvshinov is accused of stealing 57 million rubles

The former head of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "9th Medical Diagnostic Center" of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Major General Konstantin Kuvshinov, was arrested in connection with a case of embezzlement of more than 57 million rubles allocated for the purchase of medical equipment, TASS reports, citing materials.

"Initiate a criminal case against Major General of the Medical Service Konstantin Eduardovich Kuvshinov... fraud on an especially large scale ," the documents say. Kuvshinov held the position of head of the Medical Diagnostic Center from February 2019 to May 2025.

According to the investigation, the military medical organization subordinate to the Ministry of Defense signed a contract in 2022 with the companies Delrus and TDA-Service for the purchase and supply of equipment worth more than 100 million rubles.

At the same time, the deputy head of sales at Delrus, Igor Ignatov, and the commercial director of TDA-Service, Aleksandr Khotsin, entered into a criminal conspiracy with Kuvshinov. Having inflated the cost of medical equipment, they stole more than 57 million rubles, which they distributed among themselves. Entrepreneur Vladimir Bogdanov was also arrested in the case.

https://russian.rt.com/russia/news/1526 ... -obvinenie - tsine

Not Timur Ivanov, of course, but also a lot.
You look at this whole string of arrests for theft of officials and military personnel and you understand that the Russian Federation needed not Navalny's bubble to fight corruption, but a full-fledged war, so that they would start scratching in this direction.

"Putin's repressions in the army continue" (c)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10033735.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 27, 2025 4:05 pm

Russian economic news, 2025/08

Energy and dairy prices. Female median salaries, wage boom for Chuvashia, slowdown for IT. Business to cut personnel costs. Chinese-Russian trade trends
Events in Ukraine
Aug 25, 2025

I remember sitting at the dinner table in Kyiv, December 2021. My nationalist relatives (with Russian roots, mind you) were discussing the latest news. Russia had given the US an ultimatum - Ukraine must be formally excluded from military cooperation with NATO. I felt that such an ultimatum sounded worrying. A certain relative of mine with no small involvement in Ukrainian politics replied:

Don’t worry. Russia will collapse soon anyway, the degenerates. Who do they think they are with their pathetic ultimatums?

It’s an interesting paradox of war that it forces the warring sides to become much more interested in each other’s domestic processes. This is also true of the Russia-Ukraine-west triangle, albeit in somewhat strange forms.

On the Ukrainian side, a somewhat self-defeating desire to maximally ‘decolonize’ oneself of Russia meant that understanding of Russian political and economic processes severely deteriorated. I always found this rather strange - if I were a nationalist bent on destroying my neighbor, I would try to understand it as well as possible, the better to sharpen its contradictions.

There are some Ukrainians that claim to have made this their focus. Amidst the Ukrainian acceptance that Russian drone technologies have far exceeded their own, telegram channels now exist such as Mariya Berlinska’s ‘Recon of the Enemy’, dedicated to tracking Russian military telegrams and innovations.

Nevertheless, the Ukrainian elite’s choice to transform its country into a springboard for military and covert operations against Russia has forced it to assume that Russia will inevitably collapse. Otherwise, what hope could the far smaller and weaker Ukraine ever have? Alternatively, Ukrainian nationalist-liberal thought-leaders love fantasizing about nuclear war, as I wrote here.

Anyway, the point is that knowledge of Russia is intentionally rather meagre. I remember Ukraine’s most well-known ‘pro-NATO leftwing intellectual’ telling me back in early February 2022 that there is no need to listen to Russia threats, because:

Their elite is totally corrupt and dependent on western banks. They’ll collapse when they feel real western sanctions, they’re nothing like the Iranians or North Koreans.

Years later, this individual continues to rake in the publicity for his wise analysis. Back in 2020, he was honest enough to tell me he knew very little about Russian political and economic processes. Anyway, I digress. Meanwhile, in reality, CNN recently shared the following slick video from Russia’s massive Alabuga drone factory, which churns out Russian analogues of the Iranian Shahed drone. The west is no longer so certain in its derogatory attitude towards Russia, Iran, or the DPRK. (Video at link.)

This substack is called events in Ukraine. However, it is no secret that Ukraine and Russia are historically inter-related, to put it mildly. And given how much western strategy towards Moscow involves sanctions intended to cripple its economy, it makes sense to check up on how that’s going. After all, who can forget Mr Biden’s thunderous words back in March 2022:

The totality of our sanctions and export controls is crushing the Russian economy.

The ruble has lost more than half its value. They tell me it takes about 200 rubles to equal 1 dollar these days. The Moscow stock exchange has been closed for fully — for two weeks because they know the moment it opens, it will probably collapse.

Credit rating agencies has downgraded Russia’s government to “junk” status — its economy to “junk” status.

The list of businesses and international corporations leaving Russia is growing by the day.


Image

Instead of the rather inane question of whether Russia’s economy will collapse anytime soon, I’m interested in other problems. In particular, the extent to which the Russian economy is capable of diversifying and re-industrialization. The war and sanctions seem to have forced such a trend. How goes Russia’s ‘military Keynesianism’, just a few decades after the Russian economy was more liberalized than it ever had been?

Western pressure has also pushed Russia towards much closer relations with China and the rest of the non-western world. I am particularly fascinated as to how this relationship develops. Of course, Trump’s likely naive hope is that the Russian elite can be persuaded to abandon China, allowing the US to concentrate its forces on Beijing.

Though I doubt that will happen, in the past I have covered Russian nationalist perspectives that seem more suspicious of China than they are the west. Today’s statistics also touch on this most important of questions, with Russian economic journalists worrying about existing trends in trade with China.

Anyway, beyond these big questions, it gets somewhat boring reporting on economic news in Ukraine. I’ve done it so much, a change would be nice. I’ve always wondered just how different Russia’s economy is to Ukraine’s. On the one hand, it bills itself as less liberal and more interventionist, but at least before 2022, I always had the suspicion that there are a great number of similarities.

If anything, Russia has been more successful at implementing market reforms than Ukraine - while Ukraine only privatized agricultural land in 2020, Russia did so back in the early 2000s. Anyway, since 2014, and particularly 2022, the two have definitely diverged, and Ukraine’s economy has become essentially one big downward spiral. I’ll cover it soon as well, but in general I find the Russian economy more of an open question.

Here is what today’s commentary from economists in Russia explores:

— Energy. How have Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure affected prices, and how is the Russian government reacting?

— Business. Russia’s big state-owned energy companies experience a declining share in national dividends. Meanwhile, dividends paid out by state companies as a whole, crucial in covering the budget deficit, reach a historical peak.

— Retail trends. Fewer potatoes cultivated, more milk bought online. Showdown between national supermarkets. The antimonopoly committee introduces new regulations to slow price increases. Massive growth in the migrant-powered delivery sector.

— Wages. An overview of the 2023-24 wage explosion in Russia’s disadvantaged regions due to growth in military industry. Meanwhile, real IT salaries fall, employees report low stability, declining employee intake. New data shows Russian business across all sectors plans on reducing expenses on personnel. Finally, a comparison of median Russian female wages across Russia’s many regions. I also add to this a brief comparison with Ukraine’s much lower pre-war median wages (for both genders).

— Inflation. Unusual price increases in dairy products, and how this relates to global trends. A strange gap between rising prices for food goods and deflation for non-food goods, likely explained by increased trade with China.

— Trade. Increased trade with China in most sectors, except automobiles. To blame are protectionist measures aimed at protected Avtovaz, Russia’s state-owned car firm.

(Paywall with free option.)

https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/p/ ... ews-202508

******

Corridor of dependence
August 26, 2025
Rybar

Image

Work on the construction of the Zangezur Corridor has noticeably accelerated.

Turkey has begun construction of the Kars-Igdir-Aralyk-Diluju railway section as part of the Zangezur Corridor (Trump's Path), which is to link Nakhchivan with Azerbaijan via Armenia . The Turkish side positions the project as a "step toward peace in the region."

In parallel, Azerbaijan announced plans to complete the line to Zangelan , close to the Armenian border, by 2026 .

A transport "ring" is being formed around Armenian Syunik: after a political decision on transit through Armenia, it will only remain to connect a short section of 43 km. This opens the way to a full-fledged "Zangezur corridor" and increases the importance of the "Middle Corridor" , which is being built in the interests of external forces bypassing Russia.

However, for now these efforts by Turkey and Azerbaijan look more like an imitation of a “big breakthrough .” In reality, the project is bogged down by political contradictions and has low throughput potential , so it is unlikely to turn into what its initiators are painting it as.

Nevertheless, the situation demonstrates the illusory nature of the sovereignty of post-Soviet states. In Turkey, acting in the interests of the British, among other things, they continue to impose their agenda on the region and create a springboard for pressure on Russia and Iran.

The construction of a transport corridor under the patronage of the United States and using Turkish contractors is not an economic but a geopolitical project, the ultimate goal of which is an attempt to oust Russia from the region and the ideological indoctrination of the population.

https://rybar.ru/koridor-zavisimosti/

Google Translator

******

The prosecutor's office demands 500 million rubles from General Kuznetsov
August 27, 12:23

Image

Vedomosti reports that the prosecutor's office is demanding 500 million rubles in compensation for damages from Lieutenant General Kuznetsov (previously the head of the Main Criminal Investigation Department of the Russian Ministry of Defense), who is involved in a bribery case.

Lieutenant General Kuznetsov used his unearned income to actively buy up real estate and register it in the names of his relatives (again, to the question of the need to actively comb through the relatives of corrupt officials, to whom real estate and other assets are usually transferred).

Kuznetsov has been in jail since 2024. He faces up to 15 years in prison.

Also today, the current mayor of Vladimir was convicted of large-scale fraud. The regime is raging.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10035931.html

Stop lying to yourself...
August 27, 9:15

Image

Effective managers brought RSC Energia to a pre-bankruptcy state.

Stop lying to yourself...

Igor Maltsev, CEO of the Rocket and Space Corporation (RSC) Energia, in an address to employees on the occasion of the company's 79th anniversary, reported on the critical situation the company has found itself in, predicting its probable closure. The editorial board of Gazeta.Ru has a screenshot from the internal website of RSC Energia, which contains a message signed by Maltsev.

In his message, Igor Maltsev spoke of the company's "multimillion-dollar debts" and emphasized that "the groundwork created by Sergei Pavlovich [Korolev] and developed by our general designers - Mishin, Glushko, Semenov - has now been exhausted." He noted that in recent years, "promises for all major projects have proven unfulfilled, all deadlines have been missed."

The head of RSC Energia described the situation as critical: “multimillion-dollar debts, interest on loans are ‘eating up’ the budget, many processes are ineffective, a significant part of the team has lost motivation and a sense of shared responsibility.”

Maltsev warned that the future of the enterprise depends on each employee, and called on them to stop “lying to themselves and others about the state of affairs, convincing themselves and others that everything is fine with us.” He did not rule out the possibility of “closing the corporation, the inability to function normally, pay wages, not to mention creating products.”

The CEO called for “decisive action,” stating that “we must not sit around, but fight for the enterprise.” He suggested that each employee honestly answer the question of whether they are ready to work for results and make a real contribution, calling the task of saving the company “from the realm of a miracle”: “We must do everything possible, and everything that is impossible will be done for us by God!”

Rocket and Space Corporation Energia is the leading enterprise in the field of manned space exploration in Russia. Founded in 1946 under the leadership of Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, it developed the first ballistic missiles, as well as the family of space launch vehicles Sputnik, Vostok, Voskhod, Luna, Molniya and Soyuz. The company created the first artificial Earth satellite, the first spacecraft Vostok and Voskhod, as well as the first automatic interplanetary stations that reached the Moon, Venus and Mars.


https://www.gazeta.ru/tech/news/2025/08 ... 2744.shtml - zinc

I wonder who will answer to the law for all of the above?

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10035532.html

Googe Translator

*****

Putin Meets Key Government Members Prior to SCO & China Summit and Far Eastern Economic Forum
Karl Sanchez
Aug 27, 2025

Image
As you see, only six. From Putin’s left: Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko, Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov, and Energy Minister Sergei Tsivilev. Here’s another showing the other side of the table:

Image
From Putin’s right: First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, Minister of Education Sergei Kravtsov, and Finance Minister Anton Siluanov.

With all the happenings globally domestic affairs remain a top priority for Russia’s government that in reality never ends. As usual, we learn more about the nature of Russia via these meetings as the domestic yearly cycle repeats. The transcript covers some of those, but IMO it’s clear these six ministers were brought together to discuss more than what we’re allowed to know, so that should be kept in mind:
V. Putin: Dear colleagues, good afternoon!

I suggest that we exchange operational information first, as usual. Let's start with Sergey Sergeyevich Kravtsov.

Sergey Sergeyevich, how is the preparation for the new academic year going? There is not much time left.

S.Kravtsov: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

The school education system is ready for the new academic year. Just yesterday, under the chairmanship of Dmitry Nikolaevich [Chernyshenko], we held a teleconference with all the regions. All scheduled activities have been completed on time. We also paid special attention to preparations for September 1 in the border regions and regions that have been reunited with Russia. Security measures are a priority.

In total, almost 18 million students will sit at their desks, including 1.5 million first-graders, and 43 new schools will open. After major renovations, 670 schools, 41 kindergartens, and 22 colleges will resume their operations. Your instructions for construction and major renovations are being fulfilled on time, even ahead of schedule. You set the goal of building 1,300 schools, and we have completed 377 more, resulting in a total of 1,677 schools, providing over one million new places for our students.

From important trends: according to the results of the last academic year's Unified State Exam, there was a significant increase in the number of students taking advanced mathematics, by 12 percent; physics, by 10 percent; chemistry, biology, and computer science, with an average increase of about 6 percent. We will continue to support the interest in science subjects, and we are exceeding the government's plan for the development of science education.

On September 1, our order on unified federal programs will come into force. The same order also synchronized training programs and exam assignments --the Main State Exam and the Unified State Exam. You mentioned this in your Message to the Federal Assembly. Your assignment has been completed.

With the same order, we introduced a calendar-lesson planning system, clearly defining how many hours should be allocated to each subject in each class.

The workload for students and the time for tests and examinations has also been systematized. This requirement has been agreed upon with Rospotrebnadzor.

In the upcoming academic year, we will continue to develop the education system that you mentioned, starting with kindergartens. However, we are taking a very careful approach here, Vladimir Vladimirovich. We have selected 20 pilot regions. Together with psychologists and educators, we will work out all the approaches in order to further expand them throughout the country.

We have carried out your instructions and expanded the list of extracurricular reading for schoolchildren with patriotic content, as well as approved a list of domestic films for extracurricular and family viewing. The list of literature includes works about the special military operation, such as Oleg Roy's Shadows of Donbass. Small Stories of a Big War, Mikhail Fedorov's Heroes of the Special Military Operation. Symbols of Russian Courage, and others.

A large-scale retraining program for history teachers is starting with the new academic year. You met with the authors of the textbook. And from September 1, 2026, all schools in our country will switch to unified textbooks on state history and social studies, so teacher retraining is planned.

Next. We are improving the teachers' remuneration system. This is under special control. I would also like to mention the increasing prestige of teacher education.

Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, the year before last, there was a competition of ten people per place, and this year there was a competition of 12 people per place for teaching specialties. Even in Soviet times, there was no such competition.

And finally, dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, let me tell you about the brilliant results of our stars, our pride. This year, our national teams took part in six international competitions. As a result, all 29 of our students won medals, including 20 gold medals.

We see that the winners are not only from Moscow and St. Petersburg, but also from Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, the Moscow and Chelyabinsk regions, Novosibirsk, Samara, Kirov, Kaliningrad, Primorye, and the Altai Territory. Behind these successes are the hard work of teachers, the support of parents, and most importantly, the efforts and desire for knowledge.

Speaking about the uniqueness of our students, I will give a vivid example. Ivan Chasovskikh from the city of Khimki in the Moscow region became the absolute winner of the mathematics Olympiad in Australia, the best in the world, having scored the maximum possible points. They conducted an experiment right at the Olympiad, and the tasks were solved by artificial intelligence. So our student Ivan scored the maximum 42 points, and the artificial intelligence only 13.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, let me suggest that we organize a meeting with the winners. The guys dream about it. And, taking this opportunity, I would like to thank the teachers and educators once again for their work and congratulate everyone on the beginning of the new academic year.

V. Putin: The school year will start soon, and thank God for that. How did the teachers' congress go?

D. Chernyshenko: Vladimir Vladimirovich, I just wanted to inform you.

It was a truly historic event, because the first congress was held in 1925, 100 years ago. In our century, it was the first All-Russian Pedagogical Congress. It brought together more than 1,500 experts and educators.

Andrey Aleksandrovich Fursenko read out your greeting on your behalf. The words that resonated with everyone were what you said: it is essential to take into account the best traditions of the pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and modern Russian schools.

It was in this direction that an exhibition was organized at the All-Russian Center “Russia,” which was dedicated to all the historical stages of development. At the end, there was a summary of the main points of the new strategy, which is currently being discussed by the entire country on your behalf, and it is even being referred to as the “constitution of education.” It was compiled based on all the suggestions received from teachers and the Russian community. As you taught us, we collected all the feedback, and Mikhail Vladimirovich [Mishustin] discussed it during the strategy sessions. As we agreed, a document has been prepared based on all these materials, and we will finalize it with the Presidential Administration and Andrey Alexandrovich in order to prepare a draft decree approving this text by Teacher's Day.

And just one more word about patriotic education, as Sergey Sergeyevich said. Since last year, we have introduced the position of advisor to the director for education. And we see a very significant effect from this: 83 percent of our students want to live and work in Russia. By 2022, this number has increased by 11 percentage points, and this is definitely a result of this work. Additionally, 97 percent of students are proud to live in our country. This increase is even more significant, reaching over 37 percentage points. In other words, we are seeing good results from this project.

The Minister reported on the readiness of the general and vocational education system for the new academic year. However, in terms of higher education, this year, five million students will enroll in 1,200 universities across the country. The most popular fields of study have now stabilized, with engineering, medicine, and pedagogy being the top choices. Currently, approximately four million applications have been submitted, with over 80% of them being submitted through the "Online University Admission" portal on the State Services website.

This year, we have been paying special attention to universities in the border and new regions, as you instructed. The key task now is to prepare the university infrastructure for the new academic year. By the fall, 573 higher education facilities will be put into operation after undergoing major repairs.

We are actively implementing unprecedented investments in education infrastructure, as part of your World-Class Campuses project. We have selected 25 campuses, and we will select up to 40 by the end of the year. We are already starting to open campuses. We are currently opening the academic building of the Novosibirsk State University campus. In Nizhny Novgorod, we have 18 buildings that are part of the Neimark IT campus. These buildings will be used for the World Youth Festival. This is a legacy of the festival that took place in Sochi.

Why am I talking about this? In 2026, we will host the International Youth Festival in Krasnoyarsk, which will be based at Krasnoyarsk State University, and the campus will use this infrastructure as a legacy. Thank you.

V. Putin: Excellent.

The summer tourist season is coming to an end. How do you rate it? And of course, a few words about the new hotel classification system.

M.Reshetnikov: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear colleagues!

In the summer tourist season, from May to September, we predict 48 million trips across the country. This is an increase of eight percent compared to last year, and in May and June, the statistics for July are now available, we see that there were 16.5 million trips, an increase of ten percent. Overall, we are reaching these numbers, which is a very good growth rate.

Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tatarstan, and, of course, the Black Sea coast are traditionally the most popular destinations. Despite some transportation difficulties, Crimea has seen an increase of 11%, and the Krasnodar Territory, despite the situation in Anapa and limited airport operations, has also experienced growth, albeit a modest one. We anticipate that the opening of the airport in Gelendzhik will improve the numbers by the end of the season, which typically occurs in July, August, and September.

Adygea, Karachay-Cherkessia, Nizhny Novgorod, and Tver regions have seen impressive growth in tourist travel. Foreign tourists are also increasingly traveling around our country. This June, compared to last June, there was a 18% increase.

V. Putin: It's decent – 18 percent.

M. Reshetnikov: It's quite decent, yes. This is primarily due to the measures that have been taken to simplify the visa regime with your direct support. All the meetings with our foreign colleagues and our decisions have led to an increase in the number of direct flights to friendly countries, in addition to visa facilitation. We have also launched the "Discover Russia" program to promote Russian tourism abroad, which we launched last year. These efforts are yielding results.

The measures of the updated sectoral national project to support tourism have been fully implemented. This year, with your support, the Government has decided to increase the limits of the preferential lending program, and as of today, we have 78,000 rooms either under construction or in the design phase. This includes 347 new hotels, of which 28 with a capacity of 5,000 rooms have already been completed. We understand that this number will continue to grow.

Moreover, we are also developing major investment projects related to new points of attraction, including 21 water parks that are currently operating. I am referring to real investment projects where banks have made decisions that we support, including 16 ski resorts and four amusement parks.

The Five Seas and Lake Baikal project is entering the active phase. We have added a project in Balaklava and have already started creating infrastructure in Dagestan and Buryatia. This means that our project phase is coming to an end, and we are increasingly focusing on construction.

A single subsidy has been allocated to the regions, as well as funds for the construction of modular hotels. This program has also proven to be effective.

While developing the room stock, we are also addressing the quality of tourist services, both in new and existing hotels. To this end, a reform of accommodation classification has been launched.

The goal is to ensure that all those who host tourists meet the requirements set out in the law, and this is confirmed by their inclusion in the register, which is a unified national register of classified accommodation facilities. This register is managed by Rosakkreditatsiya, and it will serve as the basis for all tourism aggregators, booking systems, and so on. In other words, it will be a real verification process.

What is the difference between the new classification system? Previously, only hotels passed it, but now recreation centers, campsites, and glampings must also pass the classification; now there are a lot of new forms of accommodation, they are all included there. There are also health resorts, but the health resort is included in the new register automatically after obtaining a medical license. In order not to run anywhere a second time, we immediately turn them on.

The procedure itself has also changed. It consists of two stages.

The first stage is an independent assessment, where all accommodation facilities submit information about themselves to the registry. This is a mandatory step that must be completed by September 1. The process is simple and free: all you need to do is log in to the Rosakkreditatsiya website, fill out information about the number of rooms, infrastructure, and services, and confirm this information with photos of the rooms. After a minimal technical review, the information is published in the registry, and that's it. Businesses have confirmed that the process is straightforward and quick. For example, a hotel with up to 100 rooms can complete the process within an hour.

The second stage is mandatory only if the accommodation facility claims to receive so-called stars; that is, if it wants to claim a higher level of service and so on. To do this, the business must already involve special classification organizations. Last year, we increased the requirements for such organizations, introduced personal responsibility of experts for assigning stars, in order to get rid of these fake documents, and made it possible to trust the assessment. We also clarified the requirements for new accommodation facilities, unified hotels, and added requirements related to people with limited mobility, so that we already had everything in a modern way.

Since the beginning of the year, almost 18,000 accommodation facilities have undergone self-assessment, and about 6,000 of them are new facilities: either newly built facilities or 3,500 facilities that have come out of the shadows. This has helped to legalize the industry.

According to Rosakkreditatsiya, we currently have about a quarter of the accommodation facilities from the old registers and lists that have not passed the self-assessment procedure. We understand that this may not be relevant for all of them, as some may be closed for repairs and are not in a hurry, while others may have changed their business model. However, we are constantly working with all other participants. Throughout the summer, we provided step-by-step instructions and held webinars for market participants and regions. A call center and a technical support center are also available 24/7.

Of course, the activity has increased: if we had 1,500 applications per week at the end of July, now we have more than 5,000. Therefore, our call is to come and complete these procedures, as there are only a few days left. The regions leading in self-assessment are the Zaporizhzhia, Magadan, Novgorod, Pskov, and Altai regions, with over 90 applications. They are doing a great job.

There are a number of regions that need to speed up, but they all know that the governors sent a text message this morning. Everyone understands exactly how much, where, and how, and they have taken control of the situation, so I believe that we will be able to handle it. However, it is important for businesses to understand that if they do not complete their self-assessment by September 1, the classification registry will be marked as "suspended," which means that travel aggregators will not be able to display them in their systems and, consequently, book them. Businesses understand this. The regions will also be checking who is operating without classification. We gave them the requirements so that the requirements were the same for the entire market, so that no one would avoid it.

Of course, at the first stage, there will be instructions and explanations. However, on September 6, it will be possible to impose fines. However, this is not the primary goal; it is a last resort. Therefore, due to the imminent deadline, I urge all managers and owners of hotels, recreation centers, and campsites who have not yet completed the process to do so as quickly as possible.

Thanks for attention.

V.Putin: Good. I hope that those who are concerned will hear you.

The second half of the summer was quite hot, which is rare for Russia, and we faced peak loads on our energy system. How did our power grid perform?

S. Tsivilev: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

In accordance with your instructions, which you gave following last year's peak summer loads, a number of activities were carried out in collaboration with all relevant parties.

First, in addition to the autumn-winter period and preparations for it, we have now introduced the spring-summer period, because it is now vital. As part of this spring-summer period, we have carried out the following activities. We have conducted additional inspections of the entire network, including using thermal imagers, which resulted in unscheduled maintenance and repair of energy equipment. We have avoided carrying out repairs during peak loads to ensure that all power is available for the economy.

Additional reserves of backup (mobile) power sources are located at life support facilities.

Electronic systems have been introduced into emergency simulation.

The system-forming territorial network organizations, which were introduced by law last year on your behalf, have tested various operating modes of distribution networks together with the regions, including the preparation of an action plan in the event of an emergency failure of a particular program.

The share of renewable energy sources in peak-hour electricity generation has increased.

Since the beginning of this year, peak loads have been recorded once again. During this autumn-winter period, peak loads were higher than during the previous summer period, and during this summer period, they were higher than during the winter period. There has been a constant increase in peak loads. In the Southern power system, there has been a constant increase of one percent, while in the Eastern power system, there has been a five percent increase. With record-breaking loads due to the abnormal heat, where the average daily temperature reached 28 degrees and high tourist activity, on July 30, the Southern power system reached another maximum of 21,245 megawatts. This exceeded the summer and winter records of the previous year.

Thanks to the work that was carried out in advance, Russia's power system confidently passed through these peak loads and withstood them. Both the population and our industry did not experience any problems related to these peak loads, and they continued to operate as usual.

In regions with a rapid increase in demand, we are working systematically to increase capacity and develop the grid complex. This year, we plan to introduce 1,600 MW of new capacity by the end of the year. This will be largely related to renewable energy sources. The majority of these projects will be located in the Rostov Region, the Kuban Region, Crimea, and the Far East.

In 2025-2027, a plan for the modernization of key network nodes was approved, including the construction of distributed substations, backup lines, and the introduction of energy storage systems with a capacity of 100 MW. This includes 100 MW in Crimea and 250 MW in the Krasnodar Territory by the end of this year.

The cost of a kilowatt-hour throughout the entire life cycle is now our main parameter. This is our responsibility to all future generations. It is very important to us at what cost of a kilowatt-hour we will pass on this to our children and grandchildren, for whom we are now working.

The Ministry of Energy is implementing a systematic set of measures to optimize the cost of electricity production and transmission, including the development of a new regulatory framework, the introduction of unified standards, standard design and technical solutions, modern management models for construction organizations, new industry-specific financial instruments, and industry-specific orders for equipment and innovation.

Together with the Ministry of Industry and Trade, we are no longer forming an industry-specific order for one or two years, but rather for one six-year period in detail, and for the second and third six-year periods in less detail. In other words, we are trying to create an order for 18 years, three six-year periods ahead.

We also have mechanisms for early capacity supply contracts, targeted financing from anchor consumers, and regulatory agreements for the development of transmission networks. The main goal is to ensure transparency and manageability of pricing at every stage of the life cycle of electricity facilities. Now, when we make any technological or management decisions, we consider their impact on the cost of a kilowatt-hour and make decisions based on this.

In conclusion, I would like to emphasize once again that Russia's energy system demonstrates its readiness to handle all peak loads. Our citizens and industry can be confident that we will fully ensure the handling of these peak loads, and there will be no disruption to the work and leisure activities of our people.

V. Putin: Are preparations for winter going according to plan?

S. Tsivilev: Yes. We do this: when we pass the winter period, we already form the summer period, now we passed the summer period-–we are completely forming the winter period, that is, from September we will already enter the program of the winter period.

V. Putin: Regarding the national projects, Anton Germanovich. Is everything going according to plan?

A. Siluanov: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

Indeed, according to our plans, we are currently working on preparing the budget for the next three years. Our main priority is to provide financial resources for the national development goals that you have set out in your decree.

To implement the national development goals, the necessary allocations have been made to finance the national projects. We are currently actively working with ministries and agencies to verify the budget allocations that are necessary to meet the targets of the national projects, which will ensure the implementation of the national development goals.

We will review the budget in the Government in mid-September. We are currently preparing proposals to fill the budget with the necessary financial resources, so that all tasks related to fulfilling social obligations to the people and achieving national development goals are provided with the necessary resources.

We are currently working very actively with the relevant agencies. So we can fulfill all the tasks in terms of financial support.

V. Putin: Thank you.

We have a constant discussion among experts, in the Government, and in the Central Bank about the key interest rate and the state of affairs in the industry and the real sector of the economy. How are we doing?

D. Manturov: Vladimir Vladimirovich, according to the results of the past months, if we talk about the manufacturing industry, the growth rate was 4.2 percent. We have a rather reserved optimism about the results for the year, because there is still time for adjustments. At the beginning of the year, we made a forecast of 2.5-3 percent for manufacturing. For now, we will remain at this level. I mean that the main driver of growth today is transport engineering, radio electronics, pharmaceuticals, and, of course, the military-industrial complex.

Based on the fact that the Central Bank is gradually lowering the key interest rate for the budget, each one percent represents a savings of about 200 billion rubles, given that this money will be allocated, as Anton Germanovich has reported, to the goals of national projects in priority areas to maintain the pace of development, which is the task that you have set for us. As the interest rate continues to decrease, I believe that this will accelerate its own growth and provide a recovery trend for the manufacturing industries.

V. Putin: But you predict that industrial production will grow by...

D. Manturov: The manufacturing industry, specifically the manufacturing industry, is at a level of about three percent, and the industrial sector is slightly lower, at about two percent, at least this is in line with the figures provided by the Ministry of Economic Development.

V. Putin: Please.

A. Siluanov: Yes, indeed, we are currently working very closely with the Central Bank in terms of shaping fiscal policy for the next three years and monetary policy, as we see that a balanced budget, which we are preparing in accordance with the budget rule, will serve as a basis for the Central Bank to ease monetary policy.

Indeed, while we are seeing rather tight monetary policy conditions this year, we also see that the economic growth rate will still be at least 1.5 percent, according to the Ministry of Economic Development's estimates for this year. A balanced budget will provide more opportunities for the Central Bank to ease monetary policy, which will make credit resources more accessible and increase the availability of resources in various sectors of the economy. Consequently, this will provide an additional boost to socio-economic development in the following year.

V.Putin: You know that there are a lot of nuances in terms of ensuring the pace of economic growth. But in general, of course, I support this approach.
New school construction gives us an idea of the deficit in the number of schools that existed prior to the emphasis on new construction and renovation. What drove or enabled the clear change in policy is a good question. Efforts by students and teachers are clearly showing results as are the new “indoctrination” methods given the survey results. The higher education efforts are already making a difference with the new internship programs that combine classroom with genuine work at the vast gamut of institutions that provide opportunities that are nowhere to be seen in much of the West, particularly within the Outlaw US Empire. Hosting another International Youth Festival, Russia certainly merits.

The increase in domestic tourism reflects several developments—increasing incomes, greater access to differing travel modes, and the increase in the number and quality of tourist facilities and attractions. Much of all that is driven by public investment along with public subsidies for private business. Airports and highways are public infrastructure improvements as are some of the recreational facilities. The regulatory agencies that were mentioned are another form of public support that develops public confidence in the overall tourist economy. The honesty and consistency of ratings and such mark a departure from what previously existed. And all that also drives foreign tourism. For too many generations, much of Russia was off-limits; today, that’s no longer the case, although there remain a few restricted locations. As more Russians travel and take in their nation’s grandeur, they will share their stories and prompt others to also travel. The 48 million trips will eventually become 100 million.

Russia’s energy development plan continues to meet its increasing demand but given the major increases new technologies and the opening of new industrial projects will demand, many opine an intensive review needs to be made of the current plan. For example, Rosatom recently stated it’s only going to increase its contribution to Russia’s energy mix from 20-25% which takes into consideration the increasing energy demand but still seems too little. Aside from this critique, Russia’s energy system is being run by very capable people who now see that what were once different seasonal challenges have morphed into an annual comprehensive challenge. As indicated, Russian industrial and overall economic growth slowed during the first half of 2025 but is now rebounding and will continue into 2026. Russia’s choice to run a conservative monetary policy serves it well given the current Economic War being waged against it. However, Russian public opinion doesn’t favor increased economic ties with its main enemy—the Outlaw US Empire—and certainly frowns upon aiding the Empire’s strategic ability in the Arctic by selling it icebreakers. IMO, Russia has no need to accumulate US dollars for the US has nothing to sell. Siluanov’s summation is very important and illustrates the very important fundamental difference between the Russian and American financial and monetary systems and who their made to benefit.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/putin-me ... nt-members
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:54 pm

SITREP 8/28/25: Trump Scoffs at Russian Interests in Gross Display of Hubris
Simplicius
Aug 27, 2025

Trump made a very interesting comment during a press conference yesterday which entirely summarizes the West’s misguided approach to Russia:
(video at link.)

Trump is asked on his opinion regarding Lavrov’s statement that Russia could not sign a deal with an illegitimate leader like Zelensky. Trump responds by saying such statements are irrelevant because “everyone is just posturing”, and “it’s all bullshit”.

Trump could not be more wrong that a civilizational state like Russia is merely “posturing” about its existential interests, and understanding this key divergence is essential for grasping the far larger implications of the ideological rift between West and East.

It also explains why observers have been tearing their hair out trying to comprehend why Russia’s consistently clear elucidations of its demands always seemingly fall on deaf ears. Russia issues the exact bullet point reduction of its demands, and the very next day Trump’s various reps and envoys muddle things by claiming they aren’t sure what Russia wants, or that a meeting is needed to further iron things out.

Trump demystifies things by explaining that these weren’t misunderstandings or a US inability to properly listen to Russia’s demands—even worse, these were outright US dismissals of Russian concerns all along. In Trump’s decadent, reality-TV-inspired world view, every global conflict is just another daytime soap opera production you can throw enough money at, ‘rizz’ up its hosts, and things fall into place.

He cannot seem to grasp the existential implications for the parties involved, a theme I recently alluded to:

Image

The world’s a stage for silver-spooned Donnie, and its ‘inconvenient’ conflicts mere sideshows to be quickly dispensed with for the prize of accolades. That is what being uncultured gets you—the inability to understand rooted histories, barring the odd toss-off like “these people have been fighting for thousands of years” that Riviera Don occasionally rattles off about Gaza in pale imitation of erudition.

This is likely the real reason for Putin’s infamously pedantic exegesis on Russian history for Tucker Carlson, to signal to Western audiences that the conflict has much deeper roots and implications than their leaders are willing to admit.

Another implication of Trump’s crude dismissal of Russian legal objections has to do with the same so-called ‘Rules Based Order’ so often pedestaled as the sacred geometry on which the entire Western system rests. Trump callously pulls at the threads of this Order’s very seams by ignoring clearly legitimate concerns about one of the party’s legal standings, again signifying to the world that the ordurous odor coming from this Order is one of fickle arbitrariness and hypocrisy.

On the occasion of shedding light on this ideological divide between Russia and the West, it is interesting that Putin had just recently again shared his views on the origins of the West’s demonization of Russia. Many have debated this for years, citing Russia’s fraternal involvement with both US and UK in previous centuries and often attributing the ‘fall’ to the pre-WWI, Milner’s Roundtable and Mackinder’s “Heartland” years.

But Putin, for his part, traces the lineage of this schismatic hatred much farther back, to the days of Ivan IV, when he believes Papal representatives sought to convince Russia to shed its Orthodoxy, to no avail. After Ivan IV’s rebukes, Putin says the first inklings of the now-notorious “otherness” began to be applied to Russia, with Ivan deemed to be a mad tyrant and branded ‘the Terrible’. (video at link.)

So, how did we get from Trump’s casual table rants to plumbing historical myths? The underlying continuity can be explained simply: the West does not understand Russia, and does not care to understand it. This comes from an ingrained superiority complex and exceptionalism dating back centuries.

Rhetorical question: How can you resolve a conflict between two parties whose deepest cultural, spiritual, and geopolitical epistemologies you shroud in deliberate obfuscation?

(Much more, sitrep)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/sit ... at-russian

******

Medvedev on Austrian Neutrality: "NATO’s Anschluss"
Karl Sanchez
Aug 28, 2025

Image

RT today has published an important op/ed by Mr. Medvedev dealing with Austria’s neutral status that will prove educational to most as that status is faced a long campaign aimed at its undermining and reversal much like Ukraine. Although RT can be accessed by most, there are still some who cannot thanks to their government’s censorship, so I’ve reproduced it here. I don’t know who chose the title, “NATO’s Anschluss”:
The countries of the Old World are intoxicated by militaristic frenzy. Like spellbound moths, they flock to the destructive flame of the North Atlantic Alliance. Until recently, Europe still had states that understood security could be ensured without joining military blocs.

Now reason is giving way to herd instinct. Following Finland and Sweden, Austria’s establishment–-egged on by bloodthirsty Brussels–-is fueling public debate about abandoning its constitutionally enshrined neutrality in favor of NATO membership. Austrian society is far from enthusiastic about the idea. The New Austria liberal party, led by Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger and eager to embrace the bloc, won less than 10% of the vote in the last election.

By contrast, the opposition Freedom Party of Austria, which firmly opposes blindly copying Brussels’ militaristic agenda, received support from 37% of citizens. But in today’s Europe, when has the will of the people truly stood in the way?

Efforts to erode Austria’s neutrality have been underway for quite some time. As far back as the 1990s, local revisionists began building military ties under the guise of “participation in the EU’s common security and defense policy.” Until 2009, when the Treaty of Lisbon came into force, it was mostly empty talk–-about coordinating military development among EU member states, but without binding obligations. Afterward, the argument shifted: the treaty didn’t specify the scope or timing of the assistance that “united Europe” was obligated to provide in the event of an attack. And, in any case, the EU was officially regarded as an economic union. The fact that most of its members already belonged to NATO was conveniently left unsaid. At the same time, Austria was expanding its military presence beyond Europe, taking part in EU training missions thereby raising its profile in Brussels. And it was generously rewarded: from 2022 to 2025, the chair of the EU Military Committee was held by Austrian General Robert Brieger. The Austrians hadn’t shone so “brightly” on Europe’s military stage since World War 2 when Wehrmacht colonel generals Lothar Rendulic and Erhard Raus, and Luftwaffe commander Alexander Löhr, “distinguished themselves.”

As the EU was expanding its defense capabilities, Austria was quietly undergoing militarization and NATO-ization. Vienna participated in the Alliance’s “Partnership for Peace” while the country was already de-facto a component of the bloc’s logic. Austria, despite not actually being a NATO member, has become a key transit territory for the bloc. In 2024 alone, it was traversed by more than 3,000 NATO military vehicles, and its airspace accommodated over 5,000 NATO flights.

Against this backdrop, opinions were voiced in Vienna that a “faltering pacifist consensus” and the “Russian threat” offer a historic opportunity to break free from the “shackles of the past”–-namely, to scrap neutrality. Yet neutrality is woven into the very fabric of Austria’s statehood, re-engineered by the Allied powers after World War 2. It is enshrined in the three binding 1955 documents: the Moscow Memorandum, the State Treaty for the Re-establishment of an Independent and Democratic Austria, and Austria’s own Federal Constitutional Act on Permanent Neutrality. These documents are the country’s legal foundation. Should they be removed, the entire edifice of the Austrian statehood is bound to collapse.

What is there to do for Moscow, which was, in essence, one of the architects of modern Austria? The answer is to give enthusiasts of war hysteria a slap on the wrist within the framework of international law. The answers to two key questions–-whether Austria has the right to unilaterally renounce its legislatively enshrined neutrality, and whether it can independently decide to join NATO–-are both unequivocally negative.

Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states explicitly that no provisions of a country’s internal law may serve as justification for violating an international treaty. Also, NATO cannot be considered a regional organization of collective defense, and therefore joining the alliance won’t grant a permanently neutral state the same benefits as its guaranteed neutrality.

These provisions are recognized by respected figures deeply versed in the issue. For example, former Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl, now head of the G.O.R.K.I. Center at St. Petersburg State University, stresses that altering the status quo of neutrality requires the consent of all the Allied powers that signed the 1955 treaty, including Russia as the legal successor of the USSR. Moscow retains the right to veto Vienna’s move down the NATO path.

The hawkish faction of Austria’s elite must grasp the full scale of foreign-policy losses that would follow from abandoning neutrality and joining NATO. Today, Vienna is a hub for multilateral diplomacy, hosting around 20 intergovernmental organizations. This ensures its engagement in global processes and the development of legal frameworks to address emerging challenges and threats. The decision to establish offices of the UN, IAEA, OSCE and OPEC in Vienna was largely predicated on its non-aligned status, which provides an effective platform for dialogue and regional cooperation. Replacing neutrality with a bloc mentality undermines the very “spirit of Vienna” and makes it impossible for Austria to maintain balanced relations with its diverse international partners. As a result, the country is losing its unique role as a mediator and a hub for major international institutions. This leads to an obvious conclusion: it is time to consider relocating international organizations’ headquarters to countries in the Global South and East that can provide the necessary conditions for their work.

Adding to all this, Austria’s militaristic turn is shattering its peacemaker image, sharply curtailing its sovereign room for maneuver. Instead, it significantly increases the risk that Austria’s Bundesheer units may find themselves included in the Russian Armed Forces’ long-range mission plans. A package of countermeasures was adopted against Sweden and Finland after their NATO accession, and Austria should not expect any exceptions here.
IMO, it’s becoming clearer daily that the Collective Western Empire deems all legal objects that present an obstacle to its desires as “bullshit” as Trump recently stated. And of course, that’s the exact reason why that Empire is an international outlaw because it will not conform to the laws of man which include its treaties. Team Trump is no more agreement capable than all US administrations that preceded it over the last 80 years. A look to Gaza and Syria confirm the worst. Clearly, Medvedev is trying to talk sense to Austrians, but they need to be able to read his words. IMO, Russia could veto Austria’s attempt to cease its neutrality, but the Empire’s logic will be to ignore Russia as usual and continue its aggression.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/medvedev ... lity-natos

******

Lenin monument restored in Belgorod
August 28, 10:54

Image

A monument to Vladimir Ilyich Lenin has been restored in Belgorod.
The monument was removed in 2020 for reconstruction because the 3.5-meter monument had become quite dilapidated and its arm had fallen off.

The monument was essentially remade - a copy of the statue was cast in bronze instead of the old concrete, and the pedestal was covered with granite.
Yesterday, after repairs, it was returned to its place in the central park of Belgorod. The repairs and reconstruction were paid for by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. (Video at link.)

According to a recent study by sociologists from the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lenin remains the 4th most popular figure in Russia after Putin, Stalin and Brezhnev.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10037878.html

Criticism of the occupier Aliyev
August 27, 7:15 PM

Image

Regarding Aliyev's new bullshit about "Soviet occupation", "Russian invasion", etc.
In Moscow, at the official level, they will smile at him in passing and send him congratulations, and in the meantime, SOCAR facilities, etc., on the territory of Ukraine are in for hard times. Just like the Azerbaijani criminals in the Russian Federation. The response to the hysterics in Baku will be slightly different from what Aliyev expects. In fact, it is already happening. You will have to pay for Russophobia.

P.S. By the way, in Aliyev's logic, he is the son of an occupier, since his father, in the role of the head of the local branch of the KGB, "occupied" Azerbaijan.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10036763.html

Google Translator

******

"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Sun Aug 31, 2025 5:48 pm

Vladimir Putin's Written Interview to China's Xinhua News Agency

Published 30 August 2025
Karl Sanchez
Aug 30, 2025

Image

The Kremlin has published President Putin’s answer to a list of questions submitted by China’s Xinhua News Agency on the eve of his arrival in Tianjin for the SCO Summit. It must be noted that prior to Mr. Putin becoming Russian President in 2000 that relations with China were in very poor shape going back to 1956. That situation was reversed by the 2001 Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. Today the two nations share a fraternal, strategic relationship marked by many important declarations of intent over the last 20+ years with more to follow. The interview:
Question: In May of this year, Chinese President Xi Jinping paid a state visit to Russia and took part in the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, which was a great success. Your visit to China is also scheduled for the near future. What are your expectations from this upcoming trip? Over the past decade and more, you and the Chinese President have maintained close contact, guiding and shaping the course of continuous development in bilateral relations. What do you think of President Xi Jinping as a leader?

V. Putin: Indeed, our friend, President of the People's Republic of China Xi Jinping's visit to Russia in May was a great success, had a wide international impact, and received the highest praise in our country. The visit coincided with the sacred date of the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, which is a deeply symbolic event for the development of Russian-Chinese relations. We have reaffirmed the strategic choice of our nations to strengthen the traditions of good-neighborliness, friendship, and mutually beneficial cooperation for the long term.

At the celebrations in Moscow, the Chinese leader was the main guest of honor. During the high-level bilateral talks, key issues of cooperation between our countries were discussed in a very fruitful manner. As a result, a detailed joint statement was adopted, and a substantial package of bilateral documents was signed.

Yes, very soon, at the invitation of President Xi Jinping, we will pay a return visit to China. I will be very pleased to visit Tianjin again, where, as you know, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit is to be held, which China is organizing as the chair of the SCO. We hope that the upcoming summit will give the Organization additional momentum, increase its ability to respond to current challenges and threats, and strengthen solidarity in our shared Eurasian space. All of this will contribute to the creation of a more just and multipolar world order.

As for the Russian-Chinese talks, they will be held in Beijing. I will be happy to discuss all aspects of the bilateral agenda with President Xi Jinping, including political and security cooperation, economic ties, and cultural and humanitarian relations. We will also exchange views on current regional and international issues, as is our tradition.

In Beijing, we will also pay tribute to the common feat of our fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers, who together defeated militaristic Japan, thus putting an end to World War II. We will honor those who sealed the blood-brotherhood of our nations, defended the freedom and independence of our states, and their right to sovereign development.

Chairman Xi Jinping is very respectful of his country's history, as I have personally observed. He is a true leader of a major global power, a strong-willed individual with strategic thinking and a global perspective, who places a high priority on national interests. It is crucial for China that such a person is at the helm of the country during a challenging and transformative period in international affairs. The President of the People's Republic of China serves as an example to the world of how a respectful and equitable dialogue with foreign partners should be conducted. Russia highly appreciates the Chinese President's sincere desire to comprehensively develop comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation with our country.

Question: China and the Soviet Union, as the main theaters of war in Asia and Europe during World War II, suffered enormous losses and made significant contributions to the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War. In today's complex international environment, what do you think is the importance of preserving the memory of this victory? How do you believe China and Russia should work together to protect their shared historical memory, given the efforts by some forces in the international arena to distort historical truth?

V.Putin: As I have already noted, this year we are jointly celebrating the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War and the surrender of militaristic Japan, which marked the end of World War II.

The peoples of the Soviet Union and China bore the brunt of the war and suffered the heaviest human losses. It was the citizens of our countries who bore the brunt of the struggle against the invaders and played a key role in defeating Nazism and militarism. In the face of these harsh challenges, the best traditions of friendship and mutual assistance were strengthened, forming the foundation of modern Russian-Chinese relations.

Let me remind you that even before the outbreak of the Second World War, in the 1930s, when Japan launched a treacherous armed conflict against China, the Soviet Union extended a helping hand to the Chinese people. Thousands of our military officers provided advisory support to strengthen the Chinese army and conduct military operations. Soviet pilots also fought bravely alongside their Chinese brothers in arms.

Between October 1937 and June 1941, the Soviet Union supplied China with a total of 1,235 aircraft, thousands of artillery pieces, tens of thousands of machine guns, as well as ammunition, equipment, and supplies. The main route was a land corridor through Central Asia to the Chinese province of Xinjiang, where Soviet specialists quickly constructed a highway to ensure uninterrupted supplies.

Historical facts provide irrefutable evidence of the severity and scale of the battles of those years. We remember the significance of the famous "Battle of the Hundred Regiments," where Chinese Communist forces successfully liberated a territory with a population of five million from Japanese occupation. We also remember the remarkable achievements of Soviet soldiers and commanders in military conflicts with Japan at Lake Hassan and the Khalkhin Gol River. In the summer of 1939, our legendary commander Georgy Zhukov won his first brilliant victory in the Mongolian steppes, which was essentially a prelude to the future defeat of the Axis powers of Berlin, Tokyo, and Rome. In 1945, the Manchurian Strategic Offensive played a crucial role in the liberation of northeastern China, dramatically changing the situation in the Far East and making the surrender of militaristic Japan inevitable.

And of course, Russia will never forget that it was China's heroic resistance that was one of the decisive factors that prevented Japan from attacking the Soviet Union in the difficult months of 1941-1942, when it could have stabbed us in the back. This allowed the Red Army to focus on defeating Nazism and liberating Europe. The close cooperation between our two countries was also an important element in the formation of the anti-Hitler coalition, contributed to the emergence of the Chinese state as a great power, and facilitated constructive discussions on the post-war world order and the intensification of the anti-colonial movement.

It is our duty to always honor the sacred memory of our compatriots who showed true patriotism and courage, endured all the trials, and defeated powerful and cruel enemies. We have deep respect for all the veterans, those who died bravely for the freedom of future generations and the independence of our countries. We are grateful to the Chinese side for carefully preserving the memorials to the Red Army soldiers who gave their lives in the battles for the liberation of China.

This sincere and responsible attitude towards the past is in stark contrast to the situation in some European countries, where obelisks and graves of Soviet liberation soldiers are being desecrated and destroyed, and “uncomfortable” historical facts are being whitewashed.

We see that in a number of Western countries, the outcome of the Second World War is actually being reviewed, and the verdicts of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals are openly ignored. Such dangerous tendencies are based on the unwillingness to recall the direct fault of the predecessors of the current Western elites for the World War they unleashed, the desire to erase shameful pages from their history, and the intention to encourage revanchism and neo–Nazism. The historical truth is being falsified and suppressed for the sake of political conjuncture. Under the pretext of imaginary Russian and Chinese threats, Japanese militarism is reviving, and in Europe, including Germany, without hesitation of any historical parallels, they are setting a course for the remilitarization of the continent.

Russia and China strongly condemn any attempts to distort the history of the Second World War, to glorify the Nazis, militarists, and their henchmen, to vilify the liberation soldiers. The results of the war, as enshrined in the UN Charter and other international documents, are unshakable, and their revision is unacceptable. This is an unwavering position shared by our Chinese friends.

The memory of the joint struggle of the Soviet and Chinese peoples against German Nazism and Japanese militarism is an enduring value for us. I repeat, President Xi Jinping's participation in the Russian events marking the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory was a significant and deeply symbolic event. A Joint Statement (In English) was also signed between Russia and China on further deepening their comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation in the new era to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory in the Great Patriotic War, the Chinese victory in the war against Japanese aggression, and the establishment of the United Nations. This document outlines the consolidated response of our countries to the attempts of a number of states to destroy the historical memory of humanity and replace the basic principles of the world order, cooperation, and dialogue established after the Second World War with the notorious “rules-based order.”

Question: In recent years, practical cooperation between China and Russia in areas such as energy, agriculture, automotive, and infrastructure has yielded positive results and continuously achieved new breakthroughs, and the volume of bilateral trade has reached record levels. How do you assess the current state of Chinese-Russian practical cooperation? What are your plans for further promoting high-quality mutually beneficial cooperation between China and Russia?

V.Putin: Economic relations between Russia and China have reached an unprecedented high level. Since 2021, the growth in trade turnover has amounted to approximately 100 billion dollars. China is Russia's undisputed leader in terms of bilateral trade, and last year, Russia ranked fifth among China's foreign trade partners. I would like to emphasize that the figures for trade turnover are only estimated in dollar terms, but the settlements between our countries have been almost entirely transferred to national currencies, and the share of the dollar and the euro has dropped to the level of statistical error.

Russia firmly holds the lead in oil and gas exports to China. Since its launch in 2019, the total supply of natural gas through the Power of Siberia pipeline has exceeded 100 billion cubic meters. In 2027, we plan to commission another gas pipeline, the so-called Far Eastern route. We are effectively cooperating on LNG projects in the Russian Arctic.

We continue to work on reducing trade barriers between us. In recent years, we have established exports of pork and beef to China. In general, food products and agricultural goods occupy a leading position in Russia's exports to China.

Bilateral investment is increasing. Last year, an updated Russian-Chinese Investment Cooperation Plan was adopted. This year, a new Agreement on the Promotion and Mutual Protection of Investments was signed. Major joint projects are being implemented in priority sectors.

Our countries are working closely together in the industrial sector. Russia is one of the world's leading markets for Chinese car exports. At the same time, Russia is localizing the production of not only Chinese cars but also household appliances. We are also working together to build high-tech production and infrastructure facilities. We have ambitious plans in the construction materials industry.

In short, economic cooperation, trade, and industrial cooperation between our countries are developing in many areas. During my upcoming visit, we will discuss further prospects for mutually beneficial cooperation and new steps to enhance it for the benefit of the people of Russia and China.

Question: This year marks the end of the "cross-cultural" Years of China-Russia Cultural Exchange. Over the years, our countries have established extensive cooperation in areas such as education, cinema, theater, tourism, and sports. How do you assess the results of Chinese-Russian cultural and humanitarian exchanges and cooperation? What are your views on further promoting the strengthening of ties between the people of China and Russia?

V.Putin: Large-scale bilateral humanitarian initiatives make a significant contribution to the promotion of friendly ties. The national Years of Russia in China and China in Russia (2006-2007) were very successful. The Years of Languages, Tourism, Youth, Media, Regional Cooperation, Sports, Science, and Innovation, which were launched in turn since 2009, have received widespread public attention.

Today, cultural exchanges between Russia and China continue to develop dynamically. The roadmap for Russian-Chinese humanitarian cooperation until 2030, which includes more than 100 large-scale projects, is being consistently implemented.

I would like to highlight the successful organization of the Russian-Chinese Cultural Years, which are being held in 2024-2025 and coincide with the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between our countries. The rich and diverse program of this cross-cultural initiative is receiving a strong public response in both Russia and China.

I would like to add that the Russian side has initiated the International Music Contest "Intervision", which is scheduled for September 20, 2025. We are pleased that our Chinese partners have shown interest in this project.

There are great prospects for cooperation in the fields of education and science. There is a good dynamic of academic mobility and interuniversity contacts. Today, there are over 51,000 Chinese students studying in Russia, and 21,000 Russian students studying in China. By the way, in May, President Xi Jinping and I agreed that our countries will hold "cross-year" education years in 2026-2027.

Cooperation in the scientific, technical, and innovative fields is expanding, including fundamental research and megascience projects. In particular, Lomonosov Moscow State University and Peking University intend to establish a joint institute for fundamental research. We support the creation of modern laboratories and advanced centers in priority science-intensive fields to preserve the technological sovereignty of Russia and China.

There is active cooperation in the field of film production. In February, the joint film "Red Silk" was released in Russia. We expect that it will be seen by viewers in China in the near future. In May, the parties signed an Action Plan for film production in Moscow. We hope that in the near future, we will have many good Russian-Chinese films that will convey the right moral guidelines and traditional spiritual and moral values to our citizens and tell the truth about important historical events. In order to achieve this, we have launched a new project, the Open Eurasian Film Award. This is a unique film platform where there is no room for bias or political intrigue.

I will also focus on such an important issue as tourism. The figures in this sector are encouraging. In 2024, the number of mutual tourists increased by 2.5 times and reached 2.8 million people.

We have achieved good results in sports cooperation. We would like to thank our Chinese partners for their active participation in international Russian sports projects, including the innovative Future Games, the BRICS Games, and many others. The Chinese team was one of the most representative at these competitions. We believe that sports should be kept as far away from politicization as possible.

We pay special attention to youth policy. We highly appreciate the well-coordinated work of the leading media outlets in Russia and China. Our cooperation between the archival agencies serves the purpose of preserving historical truth, which is being effectively implemented.

It is encouraging that bilateral humanitarian cooperation is gaining momentum. This is undoubtedly a strategic area of our relations aimed at building a broad public base of friendship, good-neighborliness, and mutual understanding.

Question: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is a comprehensive regional cooperation organization established by China and Russia, which is essential for ensuring peace, stability, and development in the Eurasian region. China is the rotating chair of the SCO for 2024-2025. The 25th meeting of the Council of Heads of SCO Member States will be held in Tianjin, China, in the near future. How do you assess the constructive role that the SCO has played for more than 20 years in maintaining regional peace and stability, and promoting common development and prosperity? In your opinion, in what aspects should member states strengthen exchanges and cooperation?

V.Putin: The establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2001 embodied the common aspiration of Russia, China, and the Central Asian states of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan to strengthen trust, friendship, and good-neighborliness, as well as peace and stability in the region.

Over the years, the SCO has developed a solid legal framework and established mechanisms for fruitful cooperation in the fields of politics, security, trade, investment, and cultural and humanitarian relations. India, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus have joined the Organization, and partner countries and observers representing the political, economic, and cultural diversity of Eurasia are actively involved in joint activities.

The secret of the SCO's attractiveness is quite simple: a strong commitment to the philosophy of creation, openness to equal cooperation, non-aggression against third countries, and respect for the national characteristics and identity of each people.

Based on these values, the SCO is involved in building a more equitable multipolar world order based on international law, with the UN playing a central coordinating role. The formation of an equal and indivisible security architecture in Eurasia, including through close cooperation among SCO member states, is a significant contribution to achieving this global goal. We see the Greater Eurasian Partnership as the socio-economic foundation for this process, which involves aligning national development strategies and regional integration initiatives, and strengthening cooperation between the SCO, Eurasian Economic Union, the CIS, ASEAN, and other international organizations.

I am confident that the summit in Tianjin, as well as the SCO Plus meeting, will become an important milestone in the history of the SCO. We support the priorities announced by the Chinese chairmanship, which aim to further consolidate the SCO, deepen cooperation in all areas, and enhance the role of our organization on the global stage. We pay special attention to synchronizing our work with practical steps taken during Russia's chairmanship of the Council of Heads of Government of the SCO.

I hope that we will be able to give the SCO a new dynamic and modernize it in accordance with the demands of the time.

Question: As Chinese President Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasized, China is ready to strengthen mutual support with Russia on multilateral platforms, including the United Nations, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and BRICS, to protect the development and security interests of both countries, to unite the Global South, and to promote a more just and rational international order. How do you assess the cooperation between China and Russia in these multilateral formats? In emerging areas such as climate change, artificial intelligence governance, and reforming the global security architecture, in your opinion, how can China and Russia set new benchmarks in global governance?

V.Putin: Cooperation between Russia and China in multilateral formats is a huge part of our relations and, of course, a significant factor in global politics. The exchange of views on key international issues repeatedly confirms that Moscow and Beijing share broad common interests and similar views on fundamental issues. We are looking in the same direction when it comes to promoting a fair and multipolar world order based on the countries of the global majority.

The Russian-Chinese strategic partnership acts as a stabilizing factor. As the two largest powers in Eurasia, we cannot ignore the current challenges and threats, both on our shared continent and around the world. This topic is consistently addressed in our bilateral political dialogue. Russia's conceptual proposals for building a unified space of equal and indivisible security in Eurasia align with President Xi Jinping's Global Security Initiative.

Russian-Chinese cooperation at the UN is at an unprecedented high level and fully complies with the spirit of comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation. Our countries place particular emphasis on working together in the Group of Friends in Defense of the UN Charter, which is a significant tool for consolidating the Global South. One of the most significant outcomes of the group's work is the resolution "Eradicating Colonialism in All Its Forms and Manifestations," which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 4, 2024.

Russia and China are in favour of reforming the World Organization so that it can fully regain its authority and adapt to modern realities. In particular, we advocate giving the Security Council a more democratic character by including countries from Asia, Africa, and Latin America. However, any changes should be carefully considered.

The close cooperation between Moscow and Beijing has made a positive contribution to the work of leading economic platforms such as the G20 and APEC. In the G20, together with like-minded countries, primarily from the BRICS group, we have focused the agenda on issues of global concern, strengthened the format with the African Union, and strengthened the ties between the G20 and BRICS.

This year, our South African friends are leading the G20. We hope that their presidency will solidify the achievements of the Global South and serve as a starting point for democratizing international relations. China's presidency of APEC in 2026 is expected to boost Russian-Chinese cooperation.

We actively cooperate with China in BRICS in order to increase its influence as one of the key mechanisms of the international architecture. We jointly promote initiatives aimed at expanding the economic development opportunities of the participating countries, including the creation of common platforms for partnership in key sectors. We pay special attention to attracting additional resources for the implementation of significant infrastructure projects. We stand in solidarity for further increasing the role of BRICS in addressing pressing issues of our time, and we share a similar perception of the situation in the field of regional and global security. We are united in our opposition to discriminatory sanctions in global trade, which hinder the socioeconomic development of the Union's member states and the entire planet.

We are in favor of reforming the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank with our Chinese friends. We agree that the new financial system should be based on the principles of openness and genuine fairness, providing equal and non-discriminatory access to its instruments for all countries without exception, and reflecting the real position of member countries in the global economy. It is important to avoid using the financial sector for neo-colonial purposes that contradict the fundamental interests of the global majority. Instead, we need progress for the benefit of all humanity. I am confident that Russia and China will continue to work together to achieve this noble goal and to join forces for the prosperity of our great nations.
Nothing unexpected except perhaps for the frankness of how events of today mirror somewhat those of the past along with the revival of similar ideologies. I do suggest reading the Joint Statement from last May as it goes into great detail about what the two sides agree upon; as I noted, it’s in English. As a closing note, I suggest reading Pepe Escobar’s latest take on what’s soon to happen, “Russia-China: From The Memory of WWII to BRICS/SCO Synergy”.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/vladimir ... -interview

Russia: Attempt to Engage "Snap-Back" Sanctions on Iran Illegal

Statement by Russian Foreign Ministry
Karl Sanchez
Aug 29, 2025

Image

As I suspected, the attempt to cause the so-called snap-back sanctions within the JCPOA/UNSCR 2231 is being made against the proper procedures for doing so by elements of the JCPOA who themselves via their actions have no standing to do so. All of that is spelled out very well in the following “Foreign Ministry statement on the illegal actions of the United Kingdom, Germany and France to reinstate UN Security Council sanctions against Iran:”
Despite the vigorous efforts of Russia and China aimed at creating conditions for continuing a meaningful dialogue on the settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme, including the submission of a draft resolution to this effect by our countries to the UN Security Council, on August 28, the foreign ministers of Great Britain, Germany and France have sent an appeal to the UN Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council on Iran's alleged material non-compliance with its obligations under the JCPOA.

This appeal is presented as a notification provided for in paragraph 11 of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 and launching a further chain of steps to restore the long-lifted UN sanctions against Iran. In fact, it cannot be considered as such. We strongly condemn these actions of European countries and call on the international community to reject them. Such fraud cannot entail any obligations for other states.

In fact, we are faced with an unceremonious attempt to manipulate the provisions of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 by the European countries that are parties to the JCPOA. Taking advantage of the fact that the mechanism for restoring previous sanctions contained in this resolution–-which is called "snapback"–-is a unique and rather complex procedurally complex structure that has no precedents in world practice, the British and the "Eurotwo" arrogate to themselves the right to interpret the procedure for its application as it is convenient for them. However, the JCPOA and Resolution 2231 were built on a carefully calibrated balance of interests, in the absence of which the agreements cease to work.

The above-mentioned appeal by high-ranking representatives of the British, German and French authorities to the Panamanian presidency of the UN Security Council is part of a long-standing campaign to mislead other states in order to legitimize their claims to use the snapback mechanism to settle political scores with Tehran. In reality, they do not have any legal grounds and procedural opportunities for this.

The Russian side has circulated a detailed analysis at the UN, explaining the untenable background and inconsistency of European claims to snapback. A detailed argument on this matter was presented by China. The topic is not new. Following the United States, the British and the "European Two" have long embarked on the slippery slope of demonstrative refusal to comply with Resolution 2231, depriving themselves of the opportunity to use the tools of disciplining influence contained in it. Berlin, London and Paris not only agreed to comply with the illegal restrictions imposed by Washington against Tehran, but also adopted their own, including despite the onset of the "Transitional Day" of the JCPOA on October 18, 2023.

The facts are that the Europeans do not have the right to file a "complaint" with the UN Security Council under paragraph 11 of Resolution 2231, bypassing the dispute resolution stage in the Joint Commission, as provided for in paragraph 36 of the JCPOA. Their assertions that they have taken all the necessary steps in this regard are not true. The Joint Commission of the JCPOA was not convened to consider the European claims of January 14, 2020, and the dispute settlement mechanism provided for in paragraph 36 of the JCPOA was not put into effect. This, in particular, was directly stated in the Foreign Ministry's comments of January 14 and January 24, 2020, which our European opponents prefer not to mention. We have repeatedly given explanations in this regard during meetings timed to coincide with the consideration of the UN Secretary-General's reports on the implementation of Resolution 2231. By continuing to promote their distorted version of events, the Europeans are once again sinning against the truth, apparently not fully realizing that the appeal to the UN Security Council in circumvention of the provisions of paragraph 36 of the JCPOA is in itself a violation of this resolution.

By signing the JCPOA and implementing it in good faith for several years, including a year after the unilateral withdrawal of the United States from the nuclear deal, Iran has closed all the questions that it had to answer, for the sake of clarifying which the agreements themselves were concluded. This is reflected in the relevant reports and decisions of the IAEA, which Europe does not like to talk about today. As well as the fact that the problems in the implementation of the JCPOA were created not by Iran, but by Western countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany and France, which did not allow the restoration of the nuclear deal, although the Iranian side was ready for this in December 2022. We firmly believe that the disruption of the implementation of the JCPOA through the fault of the Americans and Europeans cannot be the basis for imputing demands to Tehran in accordance with the previously lifted sanctions, especially since such demands have long lost their relevance.

Attempts by the United Kingdom, Germany and France to use snapback are a serious destabilizing factor that undermines the efforts being made at various levels to find negotiated solutions that will make it possible to remove any suspicions and prejudices regarding Iran's peaceful nuclear energy based on international law and with due regard for Tehran's legitimate interests. We believe it is important to prevent a new escalation around Iran's nuclear programme, which, as the foreign aggression against Iran in June of this year showed, will have grave consequences for international peace and security.

Acting deliberately outside the legal framework and inciting other states to take the path of arbitrariness, the European countries participating in the JCPOA only aggravate their position as violators, which is reprehensible and unacceptable. We urge them to come to their senses and reconsider their erroneous decisions before they lead to irreparable consequences and a new tragedy. We are convinced that their policy of confrontation with Tehran has no prospects.

The priority task today is to resume a constructive dialogue between the parties involved and a focused collective search for solutions to avoid a new crisis. European countries still have a chance to make a creative contribution to the common cause by supporting the Russian-Chinese draft UN Security Council resolution on a six-month technical postponement in the implementation of the JCPOA and Resolution 2231. We hope that they will seize this opportunity, fully aware of the extent of their responsibility for the consequences if they reject the path of diplomacy.
]

It’s clear the Rules-Based Order is at work again, ignoring what was written and attempting to substitute their own crap to get their way and while coercing others to approve their illegal actions as they have all too many times in the past. Unfortunately, there’s no link to the joint Russian-Chinese draft mentioned above. I also would like to read China’s detailed objections mentioned above. RT has reported on this and adds a little info. The TASS report provides somewhat different language than what’s provided above, although there’s no difference in meaning. Global Times also has a report although it has no mention of the draft nor does it reflect the degree of disagreement. I’m certain this topic will be discussed at the SCO Summit that begins on the 31st. It’s hard to judge how the Global Majority sees this issue, although IMO many nations will take the Russian and Chinese positions since the UK and EUduo are clearly bandits in service to the Outlaw US Empire and its Zionist protégé.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/russia-a ... -snap-back

******

Nice Guys on Belarusian TV
August 29, 15:06

Image

Some nice guys on Belarusian TV.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10040482.html

Microchipping of pets
August 29, 13:02

Image

The Public Chamber of the Russian Federation stated that they want to use chips to register pets.

Microchips and other means of identification are planned to be used when introducing mandatory registration of pets in Russia, but there is no precise understanding of how the future system will work yet. Elena Sharoykina, Chair of the Public Chamber Commission on Ecology and Sustainable Development, told TASS about this.

Lavrenty responsibly states that he is against chips, vaccinations and 5G towers.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10040297.html

Criticism of the occupier Aliyev
August 27, 7:15 PM

Image

Regarding Aliyev's new bullshit about "Soviet occupation", "Russian invasion", etc.
In Moscow, at the official level, they will smile at him in passing and send him congratulations, and in the meantime, SOCAR facilities, etc., on the territory of Ukraine are in for hard times. Just like the Azerbaijani criminals in the Russian Federation. The response to the hysterics in Baku will be slightly different from what Aliyev expects. In fact, it is already happening. You will have to pay for Russophobia.

P.S. By the way, in Aliyev's logic, he is the son of an occupier, since his father, in the role of the head of the local branch of the KGB, "occupied" Azerbaijan.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10036763.html

Hostilely recognized the genocide
August 29, 11:04

Image

Netanyahu said he recognizes the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire.

Pashinyan is fawning over the Turks there, and here Israel has pulled such a dirty trick. Of course, this attack is aimed rather at Turkey, which has stepped up its anti-Israeli and anti-Zionist rhetoric in connection with the ongoing online genocide in Gaza. The absurdity of a situation where a war criminal leading the genocide of Palestinians recognizes the genocide of the Turks against Armenians should not be surprising in our postmodern world.

Literally the next day after this post:

Recognition of the Armenian Genocide is against the interests of Armenia (c) Pashinyan

As I already wrote, Netanyahu, with his recognition of the Armenian genocide, has pulled a dirty trick on Pashinyan, who consistently sells out all Armenian interests, and here is such a trick that under Kocheryan or Sargsyan would have been called a huge achievement of Armenian diplomacy. And from the holders of the "Holocaust" brand themselves. Although after the start of the Palestinian genocide, the brand's strength faded (the cries of "you condemn the Palestinian genocide, which means you are an anti-Semite and nobody cares about the Holocaust anymore"), and Armenia under Pashinyan has actually refused to promote the topic of the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire, although it has been actively seeking this from various governments since the early 90s.

So it turns out that Netanyahu's recognition is more of a hindrance to Pashinyan's regime than a help. So to speak, "they have hostilely recognized the genocide." This is without even considering the issue of Netanyahu's own disgrace, who is covered in blood up to his neck.

P.S. Of course, Pashinyan has not surprised anyone for a long time, but now it is quite amusing to watch some Armenian comrades who are perplexed about the breaking through to new depths of the bottom. Of course, for Armenia, all this will end badly and very painfully.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10039843.html

Moscow metro expansion plan
August 31, 9:05

Image

Sobyanin's ambitious plans to expand the Moscow metro to Smolensk, Tula, Rzhev, etc. are planned to be completed by 2030.
All this will require the creation of many new stations. The already colossal infrastructure of the Moscow Lenin metro will be seriously increased.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10044094.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Mon Sep 01, 2025 4:33 pm

Maria Zakharova's Weekly Briefing on 29 August 2025 & A Note on Exceptionalism

One of the longest in recent memory.
Karl Sanchez
Aug 30, 2025

Image

On the eve of a series of important events, most importantly the celebration of the 80th Anniversary of the end of the Great Anti-Fascist War, Ms. Zakharova provided a very long briefing (link to not yet complete English version) covering a wide range of issues, some usual like the Ukraine situation, and some like the announcement of Russia’s annual report, “The glorification of Nazism, the spread of neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance with them intolerance,” which is available in English at the link, although it’s not yet 100% complete, although a considerable amount of material is already there. Here’s what Maria says about it:
The Ministry has prepared a regular annual report "On the situation with the glorification of Nazism, the spread of neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to the escalation of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance." (Link is to complete Russian version.) The title of the report reflects the purpose of preparing such works, so that no one has any questions about why all this is being done.

The publication of this document is timed to coincide with an important historical date - September 3, when the Day of Victory over militaristic Japan and the end of World War II are celebrated. The immutable relevance of the topics raised in the report is confirmed by the many times increased attempts to falsify and distort the history of that war, to substitute concepts and to change the places of the aggressors who committed countless war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the nations that opposed them.

It is also deplorable how blasphemously the memory of the victims of Nazism, fascism and militarism is treated. It is especially sad that such revanchism is observed in the anniversary year, the year of the 80th anniversary of the Victory, which is widely celebrated all over the world.

This report is traditionally based on the provisions of the thematic resolution "Combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance", which Russia, together with a wide range of co-sponsors from all regions of the world, annually submits to the UN General Assembly. It is important to note that the absolute majority of members of the international community share Russia's approaches to this issue. So, in 2024, the Russian resolution was supported by 119 countries. 53 delegations, including the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Ukraine, Moldova, as well as EU member states, opposed it.

In this regard, we are seriously concerned about the destructive position of the states that are former members of the Nazi "axis", which casts doubt on the sincerity of the repentance of Germany, Italy and Japan for the crimes against humanity committed during World War II and on their true attitude to the memory of the victims.

US Ambassador to France Charles Kushner, who is US President Donald Trump's matchmaker, has sent a letter to the Elysee Palace, according to French press reports. This letter contains a cry from the heart about how the victims of the Holocaust, the rise of anti-Semitism and other manifestations of nationalism are being forgotten in France. We published an article in the Izvestia newspaper on this matter as a response to the problem raised by US Ambassador to France Charles Kushner in his letter. (The article will appear at the end of this segment.) This is not surprising, when for decades monuments to those who fought against Nazism and fascism have been massively demolished in Western and Central Europe.

What do you want from those who silently watched the exhumation of the bodies of Red Army soldiers and soldiers who participated in the Second World War on the side of the anti-fascist coalition or directly participated in it? What do you want from those who did not notice how monuments, tombstones are demolished, the graves of those who stood up for the victims of the Holocaust and who stopped this very Holocaust are desecrated? What do you want from those who do not invite World War II veterans living in the post-Soviet states to festive events in which they directly participated, liberating the victims of concentration camps? Now they are denied the celebrations on the occasion of their liberation. Yesterday they forgot about the heroes of the Second World War, and today they forget about the victims. If you want the victims to be remembered, restore the normal attitude to the memory of the heroes, and also remember that history cannot be rewritten.

It should be noted that the ideas of Nazism are being revived again and for opportunistic purposes. It is especially regrettable to observe how the governments of some countries that were part of the anti-Hitler coalition trample on the memory of the exploits of their citizens–-soldiers and ordinary people who sacrificed their lives in the fight against fascism.

On the way to the glorification of Nazism in a number of countries, there was a transformation in the interpretation of history–-from equating the criminal Nazi regime with the "totalitarian" Soviet regime to attempts to place all responsibility for unleashing the war on the Soviet Union and declaring it "a criminal worse than the Third Reich." More recently, the justification of Nazism was actually proclaimed a form of opposition to Russia and its special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine and protect the civilian population of Donbass. The whitewashing of Nazism and its long-time accomplices has become a form of support for the current supporters of Nazism in Kiev.

Moreover, attempts are already being made to openly identify European values with the glorification of Nazism, as some adherents of unification with the European Union have recently demonstrated. For the fight against the "Russian world" and the Soviet memorial heritage, they receive privileges, imposing on the entire society the standards of "correct democracy" accepted in collective Brussels.

The most alarming situation is still observed in the Baltic countries and Ukraine, where Nazism is openly glorified, Russophobia is being implanted and monuments in honor of anti-fascists are being destroyed. The situation in Poland and the Czech Republic is no less acute. Moldova and a number of other countries are rapidly approaching the "leaders" of this anti-rating. In the same vein are Western countries, whose governments turn a blind eye to manifestations of racism and xenophobia at home and gloss over the grave consequences of their colonial policies of the past, which are largely responsible for the current manifestations of racism, which are causing a wave of indignation around the world, including the countries of the Global South.

The trends and facts analysed in this report only confirm the thesis defended by Russia and its many supporters that manifestations of racial discrimination, xenophobia and Russophobia and the glorification of Nazism pose a direct threat to the fundamental values of genuine democracy and human rights and pose a serious challenge to international and regional security and stability.

Russia, together with like-minded people, does not intend to put up with such racist and neo-colonial approaches and will oppose them in every possible way. We will make every effort to ensure that the feat of millions of heroes who gave the world a chance for freedom and prosperity is not forgotten. [My Emphasis]

Fine words, but those words must be turned to deeds in Palestine and the Levant as a whole. If Russians with dual citizenship support the same type of Genocide that was inherent in Plan Ost, then those people must forfeit their Russian citizenship and be treated as Nazis were. Now for Maria’s Izvestia article:

Selective memory: Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on the growth of neo-Nazi sentiments in Europe

We have been talking about the growth of neo-Nazi manifestations in Europe constantly for many years. First they denigrate the Red Army, then they forget about the Holocaust.

The other day, US Ambassador to France Charles Kushner (father of US President Donald Trump's son-in-law) in a letter to President Emmanuel Macron expressed "deep concern about the surge in anti-Semitism in France and the lack of sufficient measures by the government to combat it." He also claims that "almost half of young French people say they have never heard of the Holocaust. The persistence of such ignorance makes us think about the curriculum of French schools." Charles Kushner has every moral right to raise this topic as a descendant of Belarusian Jews who survived the Holocaust, members of the Belsky brothers' partisan detachment.

The reaction of the Elysee Palace followed... in the form of hysteria. The ambassador was summoned to the French Foreign Ministry, where he was reminded of his "obligation not to interfere in the internal affairs of states," and was also told that his revelations "do not correspond to the quality of transatlantic relations... and the trust that must be built between the allies." It is strange to read and hear about "interference in internal affairs", because the topic of human rights should be, as official Paris has been convincing us for many years, of a cross-border nature.

Now to the main thing. The situation with the collective memory of the Holocaust in the European Union is a direct consequence of a deliberate policy to fragment the history of World War II. Westerners tried to view the tragedy of the Jewish people without taking into account the total genocide carried out by the Third Reich in Eastern Europe as part of the liberation of "living space" for the Übermensch race. Then the history of salvation and liberation by the Red Army was systematically denigrated.

This was most evident in the transformation of commemorations in Europe on the occasion of the International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust. Recall that it was established in 2005 by the UN General Assembly and is celebrated annually on January 27, the day of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camp "Auschwitz" by Soviet troops. The Polish authorities have long stopped inviting veteran liberators from the post-Soviet states to them.

The UN Secretariat does not invite Soviet veterans on this day either. This is done only by the Permanent Mission of Russia, which every year on January 27 organizes commemorative events at the UN, the main heroes of which are participants in the Great Patriotic War and former prisoners of concentration camps. How many exhibitions, concerts, receptions have we organized in our national capacity at the UN, without waiting for invitations from our veterans from the "collective Western anti-mind" and the UN led by it.

Back in 2010, at the celebration of the 65th anniversary of the Victory in New York, the orchestra conducted by Vladimir Spivakov performed in the UN General Assembly Hall. Veterans invited by the Russian side sang military songs, and when the "Victory Day" broke out at the end, the whole hall stood up and gave a standing ovation. I remember how in 2018 Mikhail Turetsky and I brought the songs of Victory to the General Assembly hall and sang them with veterans living in the United States, whom the international officialdom responsible for the Holocaust at the UN simply forgot. It was not just a concert, but a celebration of the triumph of justice and the spirit of Victory over dehumanization. Veterans and prisoners of concentration camps surrounded us with tears in their eyes, and we... could not finish the performance.

Why did the West treat them, the heroes, in this way? Because they were not supposed to remind the distinguished guests of the historical truth with their presence.

As far as I remember, in 2007, UN staff invited our veterans. But after they told the whole truth about the liberating role of the Red Army, they were no longer invited. Only Western witnesses of those events were invited, who told how on January 27, 1945, "American soldiers with the stars and stripes flag were met at the gates of Auschwitz"...

The European bureaucracy and Western European capitals, including Paris, London and Berlin, if they did not openly approve, then did not react in any way to the revanchism of the "young Europeans", who declared war on the Soviet memorial heritage and legitimized the rehabilitation of the bloody executioners of the Holocaust. This was the case, for example, in the Estonian Kohtla-Järve, where, under the pretext of "reburial", an excavator opened a mass grave of Red Army soldiers. Even a sign about the work being carried out was not installed. The remains of today's revanchists who died for freedom were literally ground with a ladle. Earlier, the monument "Mother" had already been demolished at this place and all Soviet symbols had been erased, leaving only the sign "victims of the Second World War".

In this context, we hope that Charles Kushner will be interested in another no less alarming fact: in 2022, a monument to Soviet soldiers who died during the liberation of the city from the Nazis was dismantled in the Polish city of Malbork. Among those who died in those battles in early 1945 was Asael, one of the legendary Belsky brothers. Especially cynical is the fact that the Deputy Minister of State Assets of Poland, Karol Rabenda, took part in the dismantling of the monument.

The French Foreign Ministry, neither under Emmanuel Macron nor under his predecessors, has ever opposed the destruction of monuments to Red Army soldiers in Poland, the Baltic countries, Ukraine, or the installation of monuments to Hitler's collaborators. First, they rewrote history for themselves, crossing out the real liberators and glorifying the criminals convicted by the Nuremberg Tribunal. The next inevitable step is the oblivion of the victims of the Holocaust. They also prevent you from honoring new pseudo-heroes.

This is often done by direct descendants of the Nazis and their accomplices. We remember how all the forces of "united Europe" were thrown into promoting Annalena Baerbock, who was proud of her grandfather, a member of the NSDAP, to the post of President of the UN General Assembly in the year of the 80th anniversary of the Victory over Nazi Germany. We never heard a word of repentance for his sins from her.

Indignant letters, notes, articles in the fight against this evil of denial and fragmentation of history will not help. It is time to learn that without unconditional recognition of the liberating role of the Red Army, which stopped the genocide committed by the Nazi executioners and their henchmen, the memory of the victims of the Holocaust is also doomed to be ousted from the European public consciousness. There are no saviors, and the saved are not needed.

And where is the guarantee that at some point an influential politician will not appear abroad, who will also declare what Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan voiced regarding the genocide of the Armenian people:

"International recognition of the Armenian Genocide is not among our foreign policy priorities today."

There are no such guarantees. But there is one and unconditional one: the victims of the Holocaust will not be forgotten, and the memory of the heroes who destroyed Nazism and saved the survivors will be preserved, doing it not sporadically or under the stick, but consciously, voluntarily sacrificing their lives to save others. We will do everything to ensure that this truth is never forgotten.
As I’ve ceaselessly written, Nazism was saved by the Outlaw US Empire and its UK ally at the end of WW2 and was used in their ongoing war against the Soviet Union. IMO it’s important to look up and notice there’s zero celebration planned by the Outlaw US Empire for this 80th Anniversary—utterly nothing to correspond to Beijing’s celebration except silence and the ongoing escalation of Trump’s Trade/Tariff War against the world. Some are aware that after WW2 ended in Europe, the US and UK made certain former Fascists were placed back into positions of power, while those on the Left who contributed greatly to the Fascist defeat were scorned and in some cases were violently repressed as was the case in Greece. Much has recently been noted about the origins of various German leaders, that they came from the UK’s occupational sector of post-war Germany and their Nazi heritage. IMO, that provides a direct policy link between today and 1945 and the promotion of Nazis. IMO, it appears clear that today’s Nazis can’t wait for the deaths of those remining from WW2 so the emotive scenes like the one Maria described won’t occur again. As a historian and former teacher, I’m distressed so few know of Hitler’s Plan Ost and what it sought to accomplish—that was NEVER part of my US history curriculum or is mentioned prominently in WW2 history texts; I only learned about Plan Ost much later while undertaking my own independent course of research.

I’ve been a student of history and human nature for decades and have sought an answer to the root cause of the motivation for domination and believe it resides in exceptionalism, often supposedly divinely mandated as we see with Zionists, Nazis and Europeans generally. Now, clearly exceptionalism isn’t just a European malady as the Japanese embraced it wholeheartedly, and then there’s the Indian version within Hinduism. It’s not my intent to do a deep examination of exceptionalism at this time, but I see it factoring very deeply into the fabric of past and present geopolitics that it cannot be ignored—Trump’s behavior and that of his elite allies exemplifies that. And yes, Great Russia too had its failings in what’s known as Russian Chauvinism, which is part of its historical failings in relations with Jews. However, as we move into the Multipolar World and the realization that Humanity must cooperate to advance, exceptionalism no longer has any place and instead is a great hindrance to progress. Two if the world’s oldest cultural civilizations—Persian and Chinese—have learned over their 5,000 years of experience that accepting and adopting others by learning their ways while they learn yours is the best path to long term Harmony. That means patience and forbearance become paramount—the term stranger needs to become friend; and given past events, that may be difficult but not impossible if there’s will.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/maria-za ... iefing-3c3

******

From September 1st...
September 1, 13:04

Image

Searching for extremist materials is prohibited, fine up to 5,000 rubles;
SIM cards and personal accounts cannot be transferred, fine up to 200,000 rubles;
When buying a SIM card, you will be filmed, the recording of your face will be stored for 30 days;
Advertising and distribution of VPN, as well as information about installation is prohibited, fine up to 500,000 rubles.
Advertising in blocked social networks and services is prohibited, fine up to 500,000 rubles.
All new smartphones must have the state messenger Max and the domestic app store RuStore.

In general, everything is developing within the framework of the expected course to tighten state control and regulation in the field of the Internet and communications. In the fall, some messengers will be blocked and the process of turning MAX into a state messenger, to which many basic state services will be linked, will be finalized. Whether it will be possible to turn all this into an analogue of WeChat, we will see in the process. There is obviously a certain skepticism.

P.S. I remind readers that there is no need to advertise VPNs and methods of bypassing blocking in the comments. Those who need to know already know where to get them and what to install.
The same applies to advertising of various kinds of "extremism", such as the idiot Stomakhin and similar garbage - such comments will be deleted completely.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10045330.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Wed Sep 03, 2025 3:48 pm

Scott Ritter: Citizen Diplomacy
September 3, 2025
By Scott Ritter, Substack, 8/22/25

We, the People of the United States of America, are the custodians of our Constitutional Republic. Through our free and democratic processes, we elect officials to represent us in government, and through these very same processes, backed by the rule of law, we hold these same officials accountable for what they do in our name. The processes of good citizenship, however, are not defined by passivity, limited simply to participation in elections, but rather dynamic actions that promote constant engagement across the full spectrum of issues that define our collective daily existence. Good citizenship sets the standards through which we hold elected officials accountable, and good citizens lead by example. This applies to both the domestic and foreign policies being implemented in our name.

The issue of Russophobia in America today should be a concern for us all. Russophobia is designed to exploit the ignorance of the American people by promulgating falsehoods about the reality of Russia that are designed to generate fear, fear which is then exploited by those whom we elect to support policies which postulate Russia as the eternal bogeyman. This mage is then used to justify defense spending and national security postures that have put the United States on a highway to hell that can only end with a nuclear Armageddon. In short, Russophobia represents an existential threat to the security of the United States and the entire world. It is one of the most dangerous threats facing the American people today, and yet it is fostered by mainstream media, academia and the permanent bureaucracy of government, all of which are deeply infected with the intellectual poison produced by Russophobia.

The antidote to this poison is knowledge and information that can only be garnered through direct contact between the American and Russian people.

This is where citizen diplomacy comes in.

I have been actively engaged in citizen diplomacy with Russia since April 2023, when I first travelled to Russia to promote the cause of peace through nuclear disarmament. At that time, I engaged in the practice of repairing trust between the American and Russian people “one handshake at a time.”

Image
The Challenge Coin I brought with me to Russia in May 2023

I shook many hands during this trip.

I returned to Russia in December 2023 to bring in the New Year, promoting the concept of “Waging Peace” by learning more about the Russian reality, and bringing that reality back with me to the United States, where I sought to share it with anyone and everyone willing to listen and learn.

The poison of Russophobia, however, runs deep in the blood of the United States, and my efforts at conducting citizens diplomacy were deemed a threat by the administration of President Joe Biden, which sought to criminalize my efforts, dispatching the FBI to my home under the false pretext that I was acting as an agent of the Russian government. The Biden State Department revoked my passport, deliberately preventing me from travelling to Russia in the summer of 2024, where I planned on engaging in citizens diplomacy on a scope and scale greater than previously practiced.

I refused to be intimidated by this obvious lawfare being waged against me and the cause of peace I promoted. While I fought to get my passport returned, I continued to engage with the Russian people, attending several functions at the Russian Embassy (including a piano recital, and both Russia Day and Victory Day celebrations).

Image
Shaking hands with Russian Ambassador to the United States Alexander Darchiev
I shook many hands during these visits.

I also worked with a Russian counterpart, Pavel Balobanov, to resurrect the landmark 1985 “Spacebridge” organized by the late American journalist, Phil Donahue, and his Soviet counterpart, Vladimir Pozner. One June 18, 2025, Pavel and I conducted a three hour “Citizens Summit” bringing together an American audience in Kingston, New York with a Russian audience in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

The reaction of all involved was overwhelmingly positive.

On July 15, 2025 (my birthday) my passport was finally restored to me. Shortly thereafter, the FBI began returning property they had seized in the raid on my home. Elections matter, and the results of the November 2024 Presidential election saw the Russophobia of the Biden administration replaced by the policies of peace promoted by Donald Trump. These policies were founded in the notion that America was best served by learning to live in peace with Russia. Free speech was once again a concept protected by the government, even when the concepts promoted—such as good relations between Russia and the US—ran afoul of the Russophobic narratives promoted by mainstream media, academia, and the permanent government bureaucracy.

My week in Russia (August 9-18) was one of the most productive examples of citizen diplomacy I have ever been engaged in—and keep in mind I travelled to Iraq in September 2002, where I was the first and only foreigner to address the Iraqi parliament in a valiant but ultimately failed effort to prevent a war by getting the Iraqis to allow UN weapons inspectors to return to work. The timing of this visit was serendipitous—I landed as the Alaska Summit between President Trump and President Putin was announced, and as such I was perfectly located to take the pulse of Russian public reaction, both to the potential of the summit, and its results.

One of the messages I received repeatedly from the scores of interviews I conducted with Russians from every walk of life was how important it was to the Russian people that President Trump understood that, when it came to the issue of peace between Russia and the US, the Russian people were fully supportive of his efforts. I promised that I would do my best to relay this message to President Trump, and today I am making good on this promise.

Image
Image
The Poughkeepsie Peace Initiative’s Letter to President Trump

As part of my Project 38 initiative, I have brought together a team of like-minded people, all experts in their respective fields, for the purpose of helping craft a vision for arms control with Russia, built on the premise that the last remaining treaty between the US and Russia which limits the size of our respective nuclear arsenals—the New START treaty—should be extended (it expires on February 4, 2026), and that the need for limits on intermediate range nuclear forces which were lifted with the demise of the INF treaty (President Trump withdrew from this treaty in August 2019) are essential for European and global security and stability. Together with this team—former Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, and MIT Professor Ted Postol—I have written a letter praising President Trump for his courage in agreeing to meet with President Putin, appraising the President of the results of my recent trip to Russia, and informing the President that this team—which we call the Poughkeepsie Peace Initiative—stands ready to support his peace efforts with Russia by engaging in citizens diplomacy for the betterment of relations between the US and Russia.

This is Citizens Diplomacy in action.

If you support the cause of waging peace and the work of citizens diplomacy, please consider donating to the cause. Our work is solely funded by your contributions. Thank you!

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/09/sco ... diplomacy/

******

Monument to the founder of the Cheka unveiled in Vladivostok
September 1, 21:04

Image

A monument to the founder of the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission, Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky, was ceremoniously unveiled in Vladivostok.

For the domestic "Bloody Gebnya" (OGPU-NKVD-MGB-KGB-FSK-FSB) Dzerzhinsky is the founding father. Although of course Dzerzhinsky is known not only for his great achievements in matters of state security.

Image

In Vladivostok, the monument to Dzerzhinsky was torn down in 1991. Now he has returned.

Image

Monuments to Iron Felix have gradually begun to reappear in Russia since the 1910s. His figure has received a due historical reassessment and has stood the test of time.
The relevance of the issues of fighting external and internal enemies with the most decisive methods after the beginning of the SVO has become more and more understood by many people.

The process should certainly be crowned by the return of Iron Felix to Lubyanka. Sooner or later, this will happen.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10046359.html

The Big Three in a New Way
September 1, 22:56

Image

The Big Three in China. A very symbolic photo for the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.

Trump, surrounded by his vassals and satellites, sits and sulks at them in Washington. He himself made this photo possible, despite all the previous statements that his strategic goal is to split BRICS and prevent Russia and China from getting closer. And then India kicked up a fuss.
For the US, everything that is happening is a serious strategic failure, even despite the continuing amorphousness of the BRICS and SCO structures.

Image

Let's join hands, friends, so as not to disappear one by one.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10046520.html

Visa-free travel to China
September 2, 13:06

Image

The Chinese Foreign Ministry announced that China is introducing a visa-free regime for Russian citizens.
As of September 15, 2025, Russian citizens will be able to enter China for 30 days with a foreign passport without the need to obtain a visa.
The agreement was reached at a meeting between Putin and Xi Jinping.

Great news. Interest in tourist trips to China will clearly increase.
The visa-free regime will operate in a test mode for 1 year with the possibility of further extension in the absence of serious problems.

And here is more breaking news.
The head of Gazprom Miller reported that a memorandum on the construction of the Power of Siberia-2 through Mongolia was signed.

"Today, a legally binding memorandum was signed on the construction of the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline and the transit gas pipeline through Mongolia, the Soyuz Vostok," (c) Miller

There was a lot of talk that China would not go for a second gas pipeline in addition to the Power of Siberia, but in fact there will be a gas pipeline. In the medium term, this will allow Russia to sell additional volumes of gas to China and depend somewhat less on European and American hysterics.

Well, and in general, a very characteristic marker of strengthening relations between Russia and China.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10047321.html

If I lived in Vinnitsa, I would kill Poroshenko
September 2, 15:02

Image

Mikhail Stselnikov, who killed Parubiy, said that he killed him out of personal revenge against the Ukrainian authorities.
He also said that if he lived in Vinnytsia, he would have killed Poroshenko, not Parubiy. Parubiy simply lived in the same city where Stselnikov lived.
Stselnikov also said that he wants to be exchanged. If such an option is available, then I think it will be necessary to exchange - the elimination of Parubiy is a worthy reason.

Sinelnikov said that the reason for his actions was the death of his son, who fought in the Ukrainian Armed Forces and was killed by Russian troops in the Artemovsk direction. The body was never found. After the exchange, Stselnikov wants to continue the search for the body of his son, whose remains are still lying somewhere. Stselnikov blames the Ukrainian authorities, not the Russian military, for the death of his son.

Major General Ogloblin received 9 years in prison
September 2, 17:05

Image

The 235th Garrison Military Court found the former head of the RF Armed Forces Communications Planning Department, Major General Alexander Ogloblin, guilty of accepting a bribe. He was sentenced to 9 years in a maximum security prison and fined 11.6 million rubles. Ogloblin was also stripped of his rank of Major General. He cooperated with the investigation and testified against the convicted Deputy Chief of the General Staff and the head of the Communications Department.

"Repressions in the army" continue. There are many questions about communications, especially at the beginning of the SVO. And this is certainly not the last arrest.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10047821.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:22 pm

Putin's PM Presser from Beijing

An evening affair on the front lawn of a palace.
Karl Sanchez
Sep 03, 2025

Image

In Beijing’s warm night air, the Russian press corps was treated to a 50-minute Q&A with President Putin in front of an unidentified Chinese Palace.
V. Putin: Good evening!

You are welcome.

K. Panyushkin: Konstantin Panyushkin, Channel One.

Your visit to China is unprecedented, and you have been working for four days. During this time, you have met with President Xi many times. How do you assess the results of the Russian-Chinese negotiations, and what is the most important outcome of this multi-day visit?

V.Putin: It is indeed a multi-day event, as you said. This is due to the fact that there were several events here. When we planned this work, we planned it in such a way that there was no need to travel long distances several times. Let me remind you that there was the SCO summit, followed by a trilateral meeting between Russia, Mongolia, and China, and a visit to the People's Republic of China.

I must say that this format of work allows us to talk not only at the negotiating table, but most importantly, it allows us to meet repeatedly in an informal setting and talk about any topic of mutual interest in an informal, already completely friendly atmosphere. This has proven to be very important and useful.

As for the results, they are very positive, in my opinion. The documents that were adopted, and they were adopted by all the participants, are aimed at the future. In this regard, I would like to highlight the Chinese initiative on global governance. I believe that this is very timely. And importantly, this initiative is aimed at promoting positive cooperation between the countries that gathered for the summit in China and our potential partners among the countries that do not currently want to declare this partnership.

All of this, and the unity of all those present, is a very important demonstration of positive attitude and confidence that we can achieve our goals.

You are welcome.

L. Samsonia: Lana Samsonia, Interfax.

I would like to continue the topic of your visit to China, but on the bilateral agenda. A substantial package of documents was signed as a result of your visit, and these documents are primarily related to the Power of Siberia 2 project. This project has become the main theme of recent high-level negotiations and an indicator of Russia's and China's global relations.

Do you think that the agreements that have been reached can be said to nullify the speculations that exist about the relationship between Russia and China in the world, and the attempts to interfere from outside and influence the relationship between the two countries?

V. Putin: To be honest, I don't even understand what you're talking about, because I'm busy with my current work and try to avoid getting distracted by rumors and speculations, as you mentioned.

This is a work that has been carried out for a long time, and we have been discussing it with our partners for a long time. There were several routes, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The negotiations took a long time, spanning several years. However, we all know that the global economy is still growing, even though many countries are experiencing recessions, such as the leading economies in the Eurozone.

Energy needs are growing, including in the Chinese economy, which continues to be one of the world's economic powerhouses. With an over 5% growth rate, this growth is based on a growing base. Some people argue that China's GDP growth rate has slowed down. While it has slowed down, the base has grown over time, and the over 5% growth rate we see today is different from the over 5% growth rate we saw 10-15 years ago. What does this mean? It means that energy needs are increasing.

Finally, the negotiating parties have reached a consensus. You know, there is no charity on either side; these are mutually beneficial agreements. They are based on market principles, taking into account the market conditions in this region. Moreover, the price of this product is determined not based on current prices, but according to a specific formula, which is purely objective and market-based.

Therefore, the growing Chinese economy has needs, and we have the opportunity to supply this raw material. After all, this is not a result of our meeting; it is simply the result of many years of work by businesses on both sides.

Of course, this will create a competitive advantage for our Chinese friends, because, I repeat, they will receive the product at market-based prices, not at inflated prices, as we see in the Eurozone. And most importantly, it will ensure a stable and reliable supply.

Everyone is satisfied, everyone is happy with this result, and to be honest, so am I. After all, Gazprom is one of our leading companies, and it is expanding its markets. We will have 50 billion [cubic meters of gas] through Mongolia. Currently, we have 38 billion, and there are a couple of other routes that will also increase. In total, we will have over 100 billion cubic meters of gas.

Pavel, please.

P. Zarubin: Good evening!

Pavel Zarubin, Russia TV channel.

You often talk about the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis, and yesterday, by the way, you also talked about the reasons for Ukraine's accession to NATO. However, we are now witnessing European leaders who claim to provide security guarantees for Ukraine but are primarily focused on deploying their troops in Ukraine. Additionally, many continue to advocate for Ukraine's accession to the European Union.

But we also see that the European Union is rapidly transforming from an economic union into a military-political bloc, with almost constant aggressive decisions and statements.

How can you comment on all these scenarios?

V.Putin: I agree with those who believe that every country has the right to choose its own security system. This applies to all countries, including Ukraine. However, it also means that the security of one party cannot be ensured at the expense of the security of another party, in this case, the Russian Federation.

We have always opposed Ukraine's membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, but we have never questioned its right to conduct its economic and business activities as it sees fit, including its membership in the European Union.

A. Yunashev: Can we continue about Ukraine?

V. Putin: You can.

A. Yunashev: Alexander Yunashev, Life.

When Russia and the United States are discussing their efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution in Ukraine, the formula of “security guarantees in exchange for territory” is becoming increasingly popular. Does this align with what you discussed with Trump in Alaska?

And what do you mean when you say that Russia is ready to join in developing these guarantees? Who should be the guarantor, in your opinion?

And, if you don't mind, about Zelensky: is there any point in meeting with him now, in the current circumstances? Is it possible to reach any agreements at this meeting?

Thank you.

V. Putin: The first part, once again.

A. Yunashev: The US efforts – there are some speculations now that there is a formula of “security guarantees in exchange for territories”.

V. Putin: No, we have never raised this issue or discussed it in this way.

Security guarantees are natural, and I often talk about them. We believe that any country should have these guarantees and a security system, including Ukraine. But this is not connected with any exchanges, especially with the exchange of territories.

I want to emphasize that we are fighting not so much for territories, but for human rights and for the right of people who live in these territories to speak their own language, to live within the framework of their own culture and traditions that were passed down from previous generations – from their fathers, from grandfathers, and so on. First of all, this is what we are talking about.

And if these people, in the course of electoral democratic procedures, including referendums, expressed their support for being part of the Russian Federation, this opinion should be respected. This is democracy – I want to remind those who forget about it. And, among other things, this is fully in line with international law: I would like to recall the first articles of the Charter [of the Organization] The United Nations, which explicitly states the right of nations to self-determination.

But we don't link one to the other - territories and security guarantees. Of course, we can say that these are related topics, but we don't directly link them. This was not a topic discussed during the Anchorage discussion.

As for possible meetings with Mr. Zelensky, I have already spoken about this. In general, I have never ruled out the possibility of such a meeting. Is there any point in these meetings? Let's see.

According to the Constitution of Ukraine – some people may agree with it, some may not, you just need to read the text carefully – there are no provisions in the Constitution of Ukraine for extending the term of office of the President of Ukraine. If you are elected for a five-year term, and five years have passed, your term of office has ended.

There is a provision according to which elections are not held during martial law. Yes, this is true. However, this does not mean that the president's powers are extended. Instead, it means that his powers expire, and his rights are transferred to the Speaker of the Rada, including his authority as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.

What should the current authorities do if they want to be legitimate and fully participate in the settlement process? First of all, they should hold a referendum: according to the Ukrainian Constitution, territorial issues can only be resolved through a referendum, as far as I remember. However, a referendum cannot be held during a state of war, which is also a provision of the Constitution. Therefore, in order to hold a referendum, the state of war must be lifted. Once this is done, elections must be held. This process will continue indefinitely.

The result of the election is unclear, but whatever the result, it is necessary to obtain a corresponding opinion from the Constitutional Court, as stated in the main law. However, how can one obtain a Constitutional Court opinion when, after the authorities demanded that the Constitutional Court of Ukraine confirm the extension of the president's powers, and the court effectively refused to do so, what happened in Ukraine? It may sound ridiculous, but the security guards refused to allow the chairman of the Constitutional Court to enter his office.

That's it, the movie's over. But not quite, because as far as I know, I don't know where he is right now, but at one point, he went abroad. However, in recent years, the powers of some members of the Constitutional Court have expired. As a result, the court lacks the necessary quorum to make decisions. Therefore, it is a dead-end path to simply hold meetings with the current head of administration, let's say, in a delicate manner.

It is possible – I have never refused to do this – if this meeting is well-prepared and leads to some positive possible results. By the way, Donald asked me if it was possible to hold such a meeting. I said yes, it is possible. After all, if Zelensky is ready, he can come to Moscow and the meeting will take place.

A. Kolesnikov: Andrey Kolesnikov, Kommersant newspaper.

Good evening!

Tell me, do you think that the multipolar world, which you spoke about in your Munich speech in 2007, and which seems to have Russia, India, and China as its new poles, has finally been created? Or is there still something to strive for?

And if you don't mind, one more question. A few hours ago, the German Chancellor, Mr. Merz, called you perhaps the most serious war criminal of our time. What do you think about that?

V. Putin: When?

A. Kolesnikov: Just a couple of hours ago.

V. Putin: I see.

About whether a multipolar world has developed or not. In general, its contours, of course, have developed. But at the same time, I would not talk about any dominants in this multipolar world. After all, when we talk about multipolarity, this does not mean that any new hegemons should appear. No one raises such questions: neither in the framework of the SCO, nor in the framework of the BRICS. All participants in international communication should have equal rights, and everyone should be in the same position in terms of international law.

Yes, of course, there are economic giants such as India and China. By the way, our country is one of the four largest countries in the world in terms of purchasing power parity. These are all the realities of today. These are not our calculations, but the calculations of international organizations. But this does not mean that someone should dominate the political or any other sphere, including security.

Therefore, we do not assume that any new dominant states should appear. Everyone should be on an equal footing.

As for the statements you mentioned, which Peskov also mentioned to me just a few minutes ago, what do I think about them? I think that this is an unsuccessful attempt to absolve himself, not personally, but his country and the “collective West” in general, of responsibility for the tragedy that is currently unfolding in Ukraine.

What do I mean? I have already said this many times: in 2014, the ministers of three European countries came to Kiev and signed a document that was essentially an agreement between the current government, then-President Yanukovych, and the opposition. According to this agreement, all political disputes were to be resolved within the constitutional framework, peacefully and legally.

And just a day or two later, there was a coup d'état, a bloody and brutal one. None of these guarantors did anything to bring the situation back into the legal framework. This is where the conflict began, because immediately after that, events began to unfold in Crimea, and the Kiev regime launched military operations using armored vehicles and aircraft against the civilian population of those regions of Ukraine that did not agree with the coup d'état. They then undermined all our attempts to resolve the issue peacefully and publicly refused to implement the Minsk agreements.

So who is to blame for the tragedy that is happening? Those who have brought us to this situation by completely ignoring Russia's security interests. If someone believes that it is acceptable to treat the people of our country with such disregard, they should know that we will never allow such a situation where Russia remains passive and does not respond to the events unfolding around it.

O. Skabeeva: Good evening!

Olga Skabeeva, Russia TV channel.

In Europe, there is an increasing number of people who are talking about the need to take our money – 300 billion dollars – and give it to Ukraine. Of course, there are still those who believe that this is not a good idea and is very dangerous, but there are also those who are willing to push for and support this theft. What is your opinion on this?

And another important question about the special operation: Vladimir Vladimirovich, is there a chance that it will end in the near future? How do you feel about it, do you feel that we are moving towards the end?

V.Putin: I will probably start with the second part, as it is the key part.

Back in 2022, we suggested that the Ukrainian authorities respect the choice of the people living in the southeast of Ukraine, withdraw their troops, and end the conflict immediately. I must say that this suggestion was not completely rejected.

But after we withdrew our troops from Kiev at the insistence of our Western European colleagues, the situation changed, and we were told, almost verbatim, that we would continue to fight until either you turned your head or we turned ours. I don't remember if I said this publicly, but it was something like that, albeit in more blunt terms, but it was quite open and, oddly enough, friendly: it was either us or you. This is still ongoing.

Nevertheless, it seems to me that if common sense prevails, it will be possible to agree on an acceptable way to end this conflict. This is my assumption.

Moreover, we can see the mood of the current US administration under President Trump, and it's not just about their calls, but their genuine desire to find a solution. I believe there is a glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel. Let's see how the situation unfolds. If not, we will have to address our challenges through military means.

O. Skabeeva: You didn't answer about Europe, if you don't mind, about the theft of our money.

Vladimir Putin: Stealing money – we've already talked about it many times. Here, in my opinion, nothing new can be said. You said: someone wants to take it, someone doesn't want to. Those who are smarter don't want to. Yes, it's true, here I am without any irony [say] and without hitting on those who are more stupid.

Why? Because the smart ones are the people who deal with finance and economics, and they understand that this will completely destroy all the principles of international economic and financial activity and will undoubtedly cause enormous damage to the global economy and international finances.

This is because many countries around the world are already creating alliances that are trying to implement their own economic development plans within individual regions, and if this continues, economic separatism will only intensify and the global financial and economic order will be destroyed.

K.Kokoveshnikov: May I ask about the SVO?

V. Putin: About the SVO? Please, go ahead.

K.Kokoveshnikov: Good afternoon!

Zvezda TV channel, Konstantin Kokoveshnikov.

Could you please share the latest information about the situation in the area of the special military operation? What reports, if it's not a secret, are coming to you from the front commanders? And in general, how has the situation on the battlefield changed recently?

V. Putin: All groups of the Russian Armed Forces are advancing in all directions. They are advancing successfully, at different rates, but in almost all directions, I will not list them. If you represent the Zvezda TV channel, then you know the names of these groups and the directions of their combat operations.

How does the enemy react to this? What we see is that they are trying to plug the gaps by transferring their most capable units from one area that is difficult for them to another area of combat that they consider more critical. For example, if I remember correctly, the enemy recently transferred the 95th Brigade from the Sumy region to another sector.

Is it easier for them on the Sumy front? No, he just replaced them with a less combat-ready unit, and sent the 95th to where he thought it was more important. And this is happening all along the front line, from one sector to another. We can't afford to relax, because it could be anything, including the preparation of reserves for more significant operations.

However, a preliminary analysis by our military experts shows that the enemy, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, does not have such capabilities. They are not capable of conducting large-scale offensive operations, and their focus is on maintaining the existing lines, albeit in the manner I have described.

This is not an isolated example; it is happening almost all along the line of contact. This is evidence that, as we believe, and as Western experts also believe, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are running out of reserves, and their combat-ready units are currently only 47-48 percent staffed. This is a critical situation.

Nevertheless, combat is a complex and brutal thing. Therefore, no predictions should be made here, and the analysis is exactly what I have just described.

You are welcome.

I. Zhdanov: Good evening!

Igor Zhdanov, RT.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, on your way back to Alaska: As soon as you landed, you started talking to U.S. President Donald Trump right on the red carpet. After the photo shoot, you got into the car with him and continued your conversation. Could you please tell us what you talked about and what language you used? Please provide some details about your conversation.

Thank you very much.

V.Putin: We spoke, of course, in English, but it was such a broken English – what I have partially left of my vocabulary. But at the very beginning – I said this at the press conference – I told him: I'm very glad to see you, dear neighbor – very glad to see you, dear neighbor, healthy and alive. And in the limousine while we were driving, it was only 30 seconds, we exchanged general phrases, and that was it.

Remark: You spent an hour talking to Prime Minister Modi in your car.

V.Putin: Yes, there is no secret. I told him about what we were negotiating in Alaska.

N. Ivanov: A cultural issue.

V. Putin: Everyone here is cultured, there are no uncultured people.

N.Ivanov: Our ties with China are developing not only in the economic and energy spheres, but also in the cultural sphere. One of the most significant events of this year was the release of the joint film "Red Silk." You mentioned this to Xi Jinping during his visit to Moscow in May, and you also mentioned it in an interview with Xinhua. Can you tell us if there will be any more similar projects?

And maybe you've also managed to watch "Red Silk"? Share your emotions then.

Thank you.

V. Putin: In fact, this was Chairman Xi Jinping's idea. We were at an event together, and I pointed out that it was very difficult for our producers to enter the Chinese market. He smiled slyly and said, "Let's produce joint paintings, and then the market will be open."

Indeed, this is true. And one of the first to be released is "Red Silk." I haven't seen this film, but I know that it will be presented here literally tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. According to reports, the film is popular, and people enjoy watching it. And of course, we have some ideas. If you're interested, you can ask the Minister of Culture, Lyubimova, and she will provide you with more detailed information about our plans.

As far as I know, there are already other joint films being worked on. This is a really good way to work in the huge, powerful, and attractive Chinese market.

You are welcome.

A. Savinykh: Vladimir Vladimirovich, if you don't mind, let's continue the topic of cinema. A film has recently been released in the West, where one of the characters is you. The film is called "The Kremlin Wizard." Have you seen this film? Have you been shown any footage? Your role was played by British actor Jude Law. Perhaps you are familiar with him?

V.Putin: No, not only have I not seen this film, this is the first time I have heard about it. I cannot comment on anything because I do not know.

A.Savinykh: Then, if you don't mind, I'll continue with another topic. You were discussing health, and footage of you and Chairman Xi discussing age, immortality, and organ transplantation was accidentally leaked on the air today.

V. Putin: I didn't even pay attention to it. So what?

A. Savinykh: Do you really think that people will be able to live 150 years or more?

V.Putin: Ah, this, I think, when we were going to the parade, the Chairman was talking about it. Yes, this topic was actively developed by Mr. Berlusconi at the time.

Modern means, such as health improvement, medical treatments, and even various surgical procedures related to organ replacement, allow humanity to hope that active life will continue in a different way than it does today. Although the average age varies across different countries, life expectancy will significantly increase.

You know, I don't remember what year the UN data is for, but I think it's 2050, but I could be wrong. By 2050, there will be more people on the planet over the age of 65 than there are five- or six-year-old children. This will have social, political, and economic implications.

R.Sobol: Vladimir Vladimirovich, please, can I ask you a question about the program?

Thank you.

Please tell us, returning to the topic of your visit and the program of your visit, this SCO summit was perhaps the largest in the organization's history. What is the role of this organization in today's turbulent world, and can the SCO become a political alliance that can effectively counter threats from the West?

Thank you.

V.Putin: The SCO is not designed to confront anyone. We do not set ourselves such a task. And I would like to draw your attention to the fact that during the discussions and bilateral meetings, there has never been anything that could be described as a confrontational beginning during these four days.

We're all set up to work, and above all, to work together with a positive mindset. We don't think about outmaneuvering or beating someone, or about achieving better results through competition. Instead, we focus on how to organize our own work effectively and achieve positive outcomes by working together.

This is what the SCO is set up for.

I. Baldin: May I ask a related question on the same topic?

V. Putin: You can.

I. Baldin: Vladimir Vladimirovich, please tell me, Europe is currently preparing the 19th package of sanctions and is threatening not us, but our partners. How do we feel about this? You have spoken with a large number of SCO members and partners who may be seriously affected, including India and China. What do they think about this? How can we respond? Who do you think will suffer the most?

V.Putin: You know, oddly enough, we didn't discuss these topics much. Why? Well, to be honest, it doesn't really concern us. The events in Ukraine are just a pretext for addressing economic issues related to certain countries whose economic ties are not to everyone's liking.

For example, yes, there is a trade imbalance between the United States and India, and the United States and China. But there is no economic imbalance between Brazil and the United States.

The deadline was set for August 8, and additional tariffs were imposed on Brazil on the 6th. What does Ukraine have to do with it? Although there were references to Ukraine. What does Ukraine have to do with it? Nothing. There are problems there, specifically in the domestic political situation, including the relationship between the current government and former President Bolsonaro. What does Ukraine have to do with it? Nothing. This is the first point.

Yes, there are some problems and imbalances in trade. But, in our opinion, they should still be resolved during the negotiation process. We have just held very long and detailed consultations with some of our partners, and I will not disclose the details at this time. We also have an imbalance in our favor with some of them.

But what are we striving for? We are striving to work with our partners to agree on what they can supply us with and what we can supply them with, and to find solutions to these problems as part of this collaborative effort. And we are succeeding, by the way. We have a partner with whom our market supply is three times higher than our partner's market supply. So what? We are patiently searching for a solution.

Second. After all, countries like India – almost one and a half billion people, China – one billion 300 million, with powerful economies, but also with their own internal political laws. You understand, because when they say from the outside: and we're going to kill you now, we're going to punish you now… As the leaders of such countries – powerful, large, which have experienced very difficult periods of their history, connected with colonialism, connected with attempts to attack their sovereignty over a long historical period-how should they react?

If one of them gives in, their political careers will be over, just as the colonial era came to an end. It is impossible to talk to such partners in this tone today. I believe that everything will eventually fall into place and return to a normal economic dialogue.

D. Peskov: The last question is being asked.

V. Putin: Let's give the girls some information about the negotiations. What kind of negotiations are we talking about? We've had many of them.

O. Matveeva: You have said that you are ready to raise the level of the negotiating group in contacts with Ukraine. Tell me, please, who could this be? Sergey Lavrov, for example, your assistant Ushakov or the Minister of Defense Belousov?

In this context, are you satisfied with the results of the previous group's negotiations, particularly Medinsky's work?

Thank you.

V.Putin: I am satisfied with Medinsky's work. If there is a need to do something in order to raise the level of his work to a political level, we are ready for this. I would not like to specify or name any specific individuals at this time, but we are ready to raise it to a truly high political level. The important thing is the result.

I think that what our negotiating team is doing now, under the leadership of my assistant, Vladimir Rostislavovich Medinsky, is a good example of restraint and a professional approach.

G. Ivanov: Can I ask about another assistant?

V. Putin: Maybe you can ask him about it.

G. Ivanov: The fact is that I wanted to talk to you about Steve Whitkoff's work.

The fact is that he is currently facing a lot of harsh criticism from both the media and politicians in the West. He is being accused of misunderstanding you during negotiations, misrepresenting the content of your meetings with President Donald Trump, and even being too sympathetic to Russia. How would you rate his performance?

Thank you.

V. Putin: It is not my task or my business to evaluate the work of the Assistant to the President of the United States. This should be done by the person who is his employer, namely President Trump.

I am absolutely convinced that Mr. Whitcoff is conveying the position of the American President to me and to other members of the Russian leadership team, and not any other position. Our negotiations in Anchorage showed, as was clear from the context of our discussions, that he is accurately conveying the Russian position to President Trump.

And the fact that he is accurately and objectively conveying this position, the position of the American leadership, became absolutely clear to me during the discussion in Anchorage. Because what Mr. Whitcoff and I discussed, we confirmed in full in the presence of President Trump, and he did not object that this was his position.

There are a lot of very difficult questions, that's true. But I think this is the crux of the matter: those who criticize Whitcoff are those who don't like his position, but they also don't like Trump's position, and that's what matters.

There are different approaches to the settlement. There are those who say that we need to fight to the last Ukrainian, as some people in Europe are trying to present the case, and there are those, such as representatives of the current American administration and the President himself, who are trying to find a solution, and a peaceful solution at that. And the first party, the "war party," always attacks the other party, the "peace party," and everything else is just speculation and insinuations, trying to support their position.

You are welcome.

E. Mukhametshina: Trump commented on the parade before it even took place, and said, “I hope Xi will remember the American soldiers who helped China during World War II.” He also wrote, “Please convey my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un as they plot against the United States.”

How can you comment on this?

V. Putin: The President of the United States is not devoid of humour – everything is clear, everyone knows it well. I have developed a good relationship with him. We address each other by name.

I can tell you, and I hope he will hear it as well: It may seem strange, but during these four days of negotiations, both informal and formal, no one has ever expressed any negative opinions about the current American administration. This is the first point.

Second. All of my interlocutors, without exception, I want to emphasize, all of them supported our meeting in Anchorage. And they all expressed their hope that President Trump's position and the positions of Russia and the other negotiators would lead to the end of the armed conflict. This is without any irony or jokes.

Since I'm saying this in public, it will be seen and heard all over the world, and that's the best way to ensure that I'm telling the truth. Why? Because the people I've been talking to over the past four days will also hear this, and they'll be the ones to say, "Yes, it's true." I wouldn't have done this if it wasn't true, because it would have made me look bad in front of my friends, allies, and strategic partners. That's exactly how it happened.

And I would like to return to what I said to your colleague on my right. The activities of the SCO and those of our partners, including our strategic partners, are not aimed at fighting anyone, but rather at finding the best ways to develop ourselves, our countries, our peoples, and our economies.

You are welcome.

O. Samsonova: RIA Novosti, Olga Samsonova.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, recently, various statements have been made in Baku about Russia. We would like to ask you how you assess the current state of relations between our two countries. What has happened between us, and how can we establish a dialogue?

Thanks

V.Putin: You said that you wanted to ask a question, and you asked four at once. Can I answer briefly? In relations between countries, there are always some questions arising from the current situation or some political conjuncture.

There are problems. But today I greeted President Aliyev and his wife, and we exchanged a few words. However, I believe that the fundamental relations between Azerbaijan and Russia and the mutual interest in their development will eventually put everything in its place.

Please, about the fighters.

V. Alfimov: Valentin Alfimov, Komsomolskaya Pravda.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, we've been talking a lot today about peace in Ukraine, about the agreements between countries, about what Europe is offering, and what Ukraine is afraid of. But I think we haven't addressed one important issue.

V. Putin: Each of you will name the most important one.

V. Alfimov: You regularly receive reports from the battlefield, and we know that you regularly communicate with commanders in the trenches and with soldiers in the trenches. What do they say about peace? Are they ready to accept a ceasefire and these agreements, or do they insist on fighting to the bitter end?

V.Putin: They are overwhelmingly, I want to emphasize this, overwhelmingly in favor of Russia achieving all its goals outlined at the beginning of the special military operation. Everything else is of secondary importance.

And how? It is better, of course, by peaceful means. We have repeatedly offered this to the opposing side, both literally and figuratively. Let's see how this process will develop further, including with the assistance of the current Administration [Trump].

You are welcome.

D. Peskov: Vladimir Vladimirovich, this may continue for a long time.

V. Putin: No, we'll finish now.

You are welcome.

A. Nefyodova: Vladimir Vladimirovich!

Alyona Nefyodova, Izvestia newspaper.

At the summit in Anchorage, you invited Donald Trump to visit Moscow and meet with you. Please tell us if preparations are being made for this meeting, if any agreements have already been made, and if you know the approximate date of the meeting.

V. Putin: The timing is unknown, and preparations for the meeting are not being made, but the invitation is on the table.

You are welcome.

L. Alexandrov: Lyudmila Alexandrov, Moskovsky Komsomolets.

You say that Russia and China are in favour of a fair world order based on global majority. Please tell us what is unfair in the current world system, in your opinion, and what mechanisms could solve it?

V. Putin: It's clear that this is an unjust and unipolar world.

The fact is that we are going to build our relationships not on the basis of majority, that is, not on the basis of quantity, but on the basis of an idea, on the basis of ideological considerations.

And the idea – I have already said this – is that the world should be multipolar. This means that all participants in international relations should be equal, and there should be no more unequals, and the unipolar world should cease to exist, including in the interests of those, at least, the peoples of those countries whose leaders still defend this outdated and, one might say, obsolete system.

Let's end here. Thank you very much.
]

IMO, it couldn’t be clearer: The coming multipolar world order will be a product of ideas from numerous sources—“on the basis of ideological considerations”—some old, some new. The most revealing statement: “It may seem strange, but during these four days of negotiations, both informal and formal, no one has ever expressed any negative opinions about the current American administration.” But he didn’t say that anything positive was stated either. Most likely, all delegates and heads-of-state were so deeply involved in the work they came to accomplish that Trump never entered into anyone’s mind—he was inconsequential to the business at hand; and for a person like Trump, that’s very negative and unflattering. We’re building something new and exciting; you don’t want to be a part of it; so, we’ll ignore you and your behavior, and work toward our futures. Unfortunately, no question was asked about why Putin said about “the Chinese initiative on global governance. I believe that this is very timely.” Specifically, why he thinks it’s “timely.”

Meanwhile, many more meetings with more heads-of-state after the big parade, and then on the fourth the short hop to Vladivostok for the Eastern Economic Forum, where Putin will participate in Friday’s plenary session. It might be the wrong tune contextually, but The Heat is On jumped up and made an appearance as that’s what I sense the Multipolar World is applying to the fading unipolar set. Pepe Escobar will understand.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/putins-p ... om-beijing

*******

Asia Times: Putin pulling a reverse Nixon on Trump
September 3, 2025
By Francesco Sisci, Asia Times, 9/1/25

In 1972, US President Richard Nixon’s trip to China didn’t end the Vietnam War, but it helped offset the political fallout there and put a different turn on the ongoing Cold War. It ultimately worked, although it still took time to materialize into meaningful collaboration against the USSR.

The American strategy of engaging with Russian President Vladimir Putin is a reverse Nixon—an attempt to pull Russia away from China’s embrace. The August 15 meeting between Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska failed to achieve the desired result, but at least the effort in this direction was clear.

However, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s August 18 trip to India put a very different spin on the whole story. It appears as though Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping are running circles around Trump.

Not only did Putin not abandon Xi, but the two also managed to woo Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who on August 30 flew to Beijing, effectively ending a tense relationship.

The Nixon paradigm did work in reverse, but not as the US had hoped; that is, this time Moscow outmaneuvered Washington this time.

Modi will certainly be very cautious with China. He visited Japan first, stressing their strong bilateral bond. He also called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and pledged to work for peace with Moscow.

But August 31 was a sad moment for America—losing, at least partly, a crucial friend that it had spent nearly 25 years drawing closer. It also represented a setback for Modi, who has tied his political legacy to aligning with the Western camp through the Quad military pact, moving India away from its traditional policy of non-alignment.

Putin is the total winner of the day. He can frame Trump’s erratic behavior as proof of influence, boasting to Xi and Modi: “I control Trump, stick with me, no need to talk with the Americans.”

Whether true or not, the narrative may seem believable, and if so, then anything can spin out of this spiel. Indeed, the next Trump-Xi summit, apparently scheduled for October, could take place under a Russian cloud. Is the US cornered? Trump now needs to prove that Putin is not in control. It could be very tricky.

If the US doesn’t redress its ties with India effectively and quickly, the entire international framework that has held the world together since World War II could begin to unravel. India’s sense of betrayal is felt to varying degrees by many US allies.

What many Asian diplomats find mind-boggling is the reason behind the betrayal. Reportedly, it stemmed from a testy phone call, where Trump insisted Modi nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize, as the US president had helped resolve the recent India-Pakistan clash (see here). The damage to the US is compounded by how trivial the cause appears, casting a deep shadow over its reliability as a partner.

Russia can now boast a political victory greater than any it has achieved in Ukraine, gaining significant political leverage points from which it can upend the current world order.

China’s position is a mixed bag. Its friction with the US has moved somewhat to the background, but chaos in the world order threatens its trade, its main economic driver, possibly more than Trump’s tariffs. While Russia may have an interest in chaos, China could simply be looking for a distraction.

Nothing is certain or set in stone. “The world’s two most populous countries need to be friends,” Xi told Modi on Sunday (August 31), underscoring there is still a long way to go between China and India to improve their relations.

Meeting on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin, Xi reportedly told Modi that the two countries could be good neighbors and play a key role in the Global South.

The Chinese press has emphasized that the visit comes at a pivotal moment, as both countries work to resolve long-standing disputes and seek common ground amid growing strains in their relationship with the United States – the proverbial elephant in Beijing’s room.

Beijing is also using the SCO summit as an opportunity to showcase its leadership and build solidarity among the Global South amid mounting geopolitical challenges. It’s a very different narrative from the one coming out of Washington.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/09/asi ... -on-trump/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply