China

The fightback
User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 17, 2024 2:31 pm

Image

US economists ‘expose’ China’s economy
In the following article for Fighting Words, Chris Fry unpicks and debunks a recent Axios piece about how China’s economy is supposedly failing.

According to the Axios article, it is a serious problem that “household income growth is outpacing that of spending”, with per capita disposable income rising by 5.4 percent in the first half of 2024. Chris comments: “In the US, 60% of the workers live paycheck to paycheck, putting them and their families at risk in case of an unforeseen crisis. Yet bourgeois economists seem to believe that it is a bad thing for Chinese families to be able to sock some of their income away for emergencies.” Meanwhile, “banks in China, unlike in the US, are publicly owned, so the savings are used to fund the country’s development instead of stock buybacks and cryptocurrency manipulation.”

Another major ‘problem’ is that prices in China are barely rising. “To the well-heeled economists at Axios, it’s a bad thing that the inflation rate in China is a fraction of 1%, while in the U.S. workers now face an inflation rate of some 4%, with prices remaining sky high after previous climbs of over 9% for essential items like food and gas.”

Chris goes on to contrast China’s merciless war on poverty with the alarming rise in poverty, inequality and homelessness in the US. And yet, “whoever wins the next election, the billionaire class and their minions from both parties in Washington will no doubt blame the unfolding crisis here on the People’s Republic of China”.

The article concludes with a powerful call to take inspiration from, and show solidarity with, Chinese socialism:

The high prices that we face for food and gas, the lack of affordable housing, the sky-high prices for education, health care and childcare, the collapse of the infrastructure, the catastrophic effects of global warming, the monstrous prison system, the billions wasted on the war industry, none of these are the fault of the Chinese working class or their Communist Party. The blame lies entirely with the tiny parasitic ruling class of billionaires right here at home.

We must explain to our class here that the extraordinary development by China provides us a beacon of hope. It tells us that the struggle here to empower the workers and oppressed communities, to wrest the ownership and control of the productive apparatus from the billionaires, to use scientific planning to direct both the production and distribution of goods and services instead of Wall Street’s drive for massive profits, all this can offer real benefits for ourselves and our families and for the planet as a whole.
Bourgeois economists, ever ready to proclaim the impending demise of the socialist economic model in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), find every opportunity to throw shade on China’s economic system.

At the same time, they devote their energy to proclaim the supposed superiority of the capitalist economies in the imperialist world, in Europe and the U.S.

And sometimes they have to stretch all logic and common sense to make their billionaire masters and the workers and oppressed here believe in the eternal superiority of U.S. imperialist hegemony over the social and economic system of China, even as the Pentagon scrambles to prepare their war on the PRC.

On July 16, the bourgeois economist web site Axios posted an article titled “1 Big Thing: China’s Consumption Problem”. The article tries to paint a “doom and gloom” picture of China’s economy. But instead, it ends up describing something quite different, an economic situation for the Chinese people that contrasts sharply with the stagnant income and still high prices that the workers and oppressed face here in the United States.

Here are some examples:

Follow the money: Household income growth [in China] is outpacing that of spending. Disposable income per capita rose 5.4% in the first half of the year, compared to the same period a year ago.

According to Axios, it’s a bad thing that Chinese workers have increased their incomes to such a degree that they are putting more of their money into savings.

In the U.S, 60% of the workers live paycheck to paycheck, putting them and their families at risk in case of an unforeseen crisis. Yet bourgeois economists seem to believe that it is a bad thing for Chinese families to be able to sock some of their income away for emergencies.

It’s important to remember that the banks in China, unlike in the U.S., are publicly owned, so the savings are used to fund the country’s development instead of stock buybacks and cryptocurrency manipulation.

Two other signs of weak demand: Prices are barely rising, and imports keep falling, even as exports soar.

To the well-heeled economists at Axios, it’s a bad thing that the inflation rate in China is a fraction of 1%, while in the U.S. workers now face an inflation rate of some 4%, with prices remaining sky high after previous climbs of over 9% for essential items like food and gas.

To slow the rate of inflation in the U.S., the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to deliberately drive up the unemployment rate, thus slowing demand as poor families can no longer buy things. Sure enough, unemployment is creeping up, and higher mortgage rates and rents are putting decent housing out of reach for our class, particularly young workers.

In China, government controls on necessary commodities keep prices in check.

The big picture: China’s economy grew 4.7% last quarter from the same period a year ago.

Manufacturing is the engine, much to the ire of a growing number of nations that assert China is producing more than its economy can absorb. Factory output rose more than 5% from a year ago, only slightly lower than that seen in May.


Contrast that with the U.S. economy, which had only a 1.9% growth rate year-to-year.

What’s not pointed out in this article is that China went from a poverty rate of 98% after the revolution in 1949 to less than 1% today, a stunning and unprecedented achievement. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the official poverty rate in 2022 was 11.5 percent, with 37.9 million people in poverty.

U.S. imperialism’s dream of China’s collapse crashes into reality

Articles like this Axios one are now commonplace. Trump and Biden’s trade war with China is in full swing, with Biden undermining his own campaign against global warming with a whopping 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and Trump pledging a 60% tariff on all imports from China.

Of course, these will surely raise prices across the board and will not yield many jobs for workers here. But whoever wins the next election, the billionaire class and their minions from both parties in Washington will no doubt blame the unfolding crisis here on the People’s Republic of China.

With U.S. warships stalking the Chinese coastline and U.S. soldiers stationed on islands just a stone’s throw from the Chinese coast, there is the real threat that this economic war could turn into a massive military conflict, perhaps even nuclear.

The high prices that we face for food and gas, the lack of affordable housing, the sky-high prices for education, health care and childcare, the collapse of the infrastructure, the catastrophic effects of global warming, the monstrous prison system, the billions wasted on the war industry, none of these are the fault of the Chinese working class or their Communist Party. The blame lies entirely with the tiny parasitic ruling class of billionaires right here at home.

We must explain to our class here that the extraordinary development by China provides us a beacon of hope. It tells us that the struggle here to empower the workers and oppressed communities, to wrest the ownership and control of the productive apparatus from the billionaires, to use scientific planning to direct both the production and distribution of goods and services instead of Wall Street’s drive for massive profits,all this can offer real benefits for ourselves and our families and for the planet as a whole.

That is what is called revolutionary socialism.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/08/12/u ... s-economy/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 20, 2024 1:31 pm

US or China, Which Is Truly Democratic? US Oligarchy vs Chinese ‘Consultative Democracy’
August 20, 2024

Image
China consultative democracy CPPCC 2018 Participants in the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) in 2018. Photo: Geopolitical Economy Report.

By Simon Turner – Aug 16, 2024

While scholars conclude that the USA is an oligarchy run by big corporations, China has developed a unique system of “whole-process people’s democracy”. This is how it works.

Who do we want to lead? With genocide ongoing, regional wars brewing, and climate change records breaking, who is a safe pair of hands?

Today a choice exists; an alternative to the US-led international order is being built, with China at its center.

A Western survey, the Edelman Trust Barometer, found China to be the country rated highest globally in terms of people’s trust in their government.

China has held the top spot every year but one since 2018, with a comprehensive trust index of 79 in 2024. The US is down at a mere 46.

Image

The people of the US are at a disadvantage, however. How can their trust in government be strong under a duopoly system that is most convincing when the population is the most polarized? That the governments in such a system based on divide-and-conquer cannot reach China’s approval rating is practically built in.

The November US election was supposed to be the toughest test yet for “lesser-evil” voting. Donald Trump — who was so supportive of Israel he moved the US embassy to occupied Jerusalem, in violation of international law — was to compete against Genocide Joe — who kept the embassy there, while arming Israel as it massacred Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

Instead, Kamala Harris took Biden’s place. She aligns with the Republicans on the genocidal Israeli regime, and today bears responsibility for its crimes, second only to Biden. But we are told she represents change.

According to a famous study co-authored by scholars at Princeton and Northwestern University, citizen participation in the process of US liberal democracy has “little or no independent influence” on government policy.

Conforming more to an oligarchic model, it is US “elites and organized groups representing business interests” that “have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy”, the experts concluded.

In China, on the other hand, the elites and organized groups representing business interests are kept below, subordinated to the government. What Western critics call an “authoritarian” system is actually a different form of democracy, run not on behalf of a wealthy minority, but rather “in the interests of the great majority”.

Although China’s former leader Deng Xiaoping did allow market forces into the country, starting with the reform and opening up of 1978, he insisted that the state would control them. Deng said of markets, “If they serve socialism they are socialist; if they serve capitalism, they are capitalist”.

In the United States, however, politicians don’t listen to the people. And why would they? How can the system be a “representative democracy” when a candidate can’t win an election without a great deal of money?

US politicians know whom they need to please. As the academic study on US oligarchy showed, in Washington’s so-called “representative democracy”, the only ones truly represented are big business.

China really is different.

China’s system of “consultative democracy”
In China, citizen participation and representation are actively sought, and channels have been set up for this purpose.

China’s “Message Board for Leaders” (MBL) platform connects the general population to local and ministry-level government officials. From its launch in 2006 to 2021, the “major’s mailbox” had already handled more than 2.3 million demands, concerns, and complaints.

Another nationwide Chinese government initiative, the 12345 hotline, fields more than 50,000 contacts a day in Beijing alone via telephone, internet, and new media, addressing issues of everyday life. Over 85% of concerns are resolved.

Using this initiative to then act on popular feedback, Beijing included in its 2022 priority list 17 “major frustrations” of local residents. Among these were insufficient elevators in old buildings and inadequate residential property services. Almost 100 policies were subsequently introduced and more than 400 key tasks were completed. As for the elevators, 1,322 were installed.

In such ways, the Chinese government follows the principle of “from the people to the people” (or “from the masses to the masses”). Moreover, MBL, 12345, and the many other official platforms represent a technologically modern way of amplifying the voice of the people.

In the contemporary era, China’s President’s Xi Jinping emphasizes the importance of what he calls “consultative democracy”. Xi wrote in his 2014 book The Governance of China (Volume 2) that consultative democracy “is an important embodiment of the Party’s mass line”.

“We need to take advantage of every mechanism, every channel, and every method to conduct extensive consultations on the major issues of reform, development, and stability, and especially on the issues that have a bearing on people’s immediate interests”, Xi said.

The Communist Party of China put this into practice in 2020, when the draft of its 14th Five-Year Plan (from 2021 to 2025) was submitted to public consultation online for the first time. The general public was able to participate in planning its own social and economic development, making more than a million suggestions from August 16 to 29, 2020, from which over 1,000 opinions and suggestions were incorporated.

Facilitating the transfer of information is the rapid development of new technologies. Chen Liang, associate professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s School of Marxism, explained:

“The opinions, views, and demands of the people can be digitized, visualized and contextualized, and the efficiency, precision and scientific nature of democratic decision-making can be continuously improved. … The people can express their views and opinions quickly, across regions and at low-cost, and exert influence on grassroots, regional and even national political and social life”.

In 2016, President Xi had set the stage, stating that Party cadres “must learn to follow the mass line through the internet … [and] understand what the masses think and hope, collect good ideas and good suggestions, and actively respond to netizens’ concerns”.

For the less tech-aware, Party-Masses Service Centers are available, from the smallest villages to the large city blocks of Shanghai. These feature distinct white and red colors, and invite anyone to come with a complaint or suggestion.

China has also created local legislative liaison stations, where “grassroots deputies discuss legislative drafts and collect suggestions from the public”.

There are 45 national and 6,500 provincial and municipal “through trains” that connect ordinary people to China’s highest legislative office, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC). Local legislative liaison stations serve as contact points and collection centers for public opinion on draft national legislation.

From the launch of the offices in July 2015 to November 2023, more than 3,100 ideas on forming or revising national legislation were incorporated.

The ambition to find further ways to serve the people was made clear in a speech that President Xi delivered honoring the 60th anniversary of the NPC:

“We must expand people’s democracy by improving democratic systems, enriching forms of democracy, and creating more channels for the practice of democracy, and enable broader, orderly political participation of citizens at all levels and in all domains, with a view to developing a people’s democracy that is wide in scope, full in substance, and refined in practice.

“In all of the country’s initiatives, we must implement the Party’s mass line, build close links with the people, reach out to them, respond to their expectations, and resolve problems that are of the greatest, most direct, and most practical concern to them, in an effort to pool the wisdom and strength of the broadest possible majority of the people”.

China’s “thorough cleanup” of corruption
Soon after he became the new president of China in 2013, Xi Jinping launched a crackdown on corruption. In this “mass line campaign”, referred to as a “thorough cleanup”, Xi sought to address long-standing problems in the country, targeting the “four forms of decadence”: “formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance”.

At a study session of provincial and ministerial-level officials in 2022, Xi reprised the theme, saying, “All Party members should always maintain close ties with the people, and accept the criticism and oversight of the people”.

These were no empty words. The anti-corruption campaign was very serious.

A former vice-mayor in Shanxi province, Zhang Zhongsheng, for instance, was given a life sentence in prison for accepting 1.04 billion yuan ($160 million) in bribes.

No one in China is above the law. Even China’s former Justice Minister Tang Yijun found he was not too privileged to be immune. In 2024, anti-corruption authorities announced he was “being investigated for suspected severe violations of the discipline and law”.

Another former justice minister, Fu Zhenghua, was jailed with a suspended death sentence for corruption in 2022.

The graft-busting campaign shows no special leniency to those who, with the most power and authority, are therefore most responsible to the people.

The anti-corruption policy has been pursued with the resolve to “offend a few thousand rather than fail 1.4 billion”.

The Communist Party of China understands that the principle of “from the people to the people” would suffer in its application if the people’s representatives were not close to and focused on them, but were rather prioritizing themselves over the people they serve.

Consequently, as President Xi has stressed, those who have power must have responsibility, those who have responsibility must take responsibility, and those who fail to fulfill their responsibilities must be held accountable.

Other examples include Zhang Hongli, former senior executive vice president at the world’s biggest bank by consolidated assets, the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC). Zhang was arrested for taking bribes.

Lou Wenlong, a former vice president of the world’s third-biggest bank, the state-owned Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), was also placed under investigation for corruption.

It is almost impossible to imagine senior executives of large US banks on Wall Street being arrested for corruption. (In fact, they crashed the economy in 2008, only to be bailed out by the government.)

Instead, as the watchdog website Wall Street on Parade wrote, despite five felony counts, JPMorgan Chase CEO “Jamie Dimon is allowed to remain at the helm of this federally-insured bank despite his presiding over the worst banking scandals in U.S. history”.

In 2023, the United States saw the second-biggest bank collapse in its history, as First Republic Bank crashed. Can you guess which bank was entrusted with more than $200 billion in First Republic assets, and realized an almost $3 billion profit on the deal? You guessed it: JPMorgan Chase.

Unlike JPMorgan, however, China’s large banks like ICBC and ABC are state-owned enterprises (SOEs), under the control of the government, and therefore the people.

For the “healthy development” of capital, President Xi has stressed, “We must be well aware that profit-seeking as capital’s intrinsic nature must be subject to regulation and constraints; otherwise, capital’s unbridled development will cause inestimable damage to our country’s economic and social development”.

Economist Michael Hudson argues that China’s control over capital is precisely why it is demonized as “authoritarian” in the West.

“There’s only one way to prevent an oligarchy from developing as people get richer and richer, and that’s to have a strong state”, Hudson said. “You need a strong central state in order to have a democracy. [But] Americans call that socialism, and they say that’s the antithesis of democracy, which means a state that is loyal to the United States and follows US policy and lets the US banks financialize the economy”.

In the US, it was not only Republican President Ronald Reagan but also Democratic President Bill Clinton who declared that “the era of big government is over”. Instead, big capital is in charge.

China, on the other hand, disciplines, guides, and even controls big capital, on behalf of the people.

Violence, crime, and surveillance
When debating the state of US “democracy”, one cannot forget the brutal violence of the US state.

In the US, police have killed more than 1,000 North Americans annually for the last decade, with 1,247 victims in 2023.

Many US police departments train with the Israeli apartheid regime, borrowing tactics it uses against the occupied Palestinian people.

Every 6.6 hours in 2023, there was a police killing in the United States. In China, there were none at all, and haven’t been in years.

Once again, the Chinese people have a voice in the supervision of the security organs. The Ministry for Public Security’s general provision leads with the importance of the acceptance of the people’s supervision by those security organs via their “petition work”.

Petition work in China (or “letters and calls”) is another term for citizens contacting government agencies, offering suggestions, opinions, or complaints to be handled by the relevant authorities.

According to the 2022 government regulatory document:

“For initial petitions in the form of suggestions and opinions, those that are conducive to perfecting policies, improving work, and promoting economic and social development shall be reported to the Party committee or government at the same level for reference in decision-making, or forwarded to the organs or units that have the power to handle the matter for study”.

As for China’s police, the provisions state:

“Public security petition work is an important part of the public security organs’ mass work. It is an important task for the public security organs to understand social conditions and public opinion, listen to opinions and suggestions, test the quality and effectiveness of law enforcement, and safeguard the rights and interests of the masses. It is an important way for the public security organs to accept mass supervision, improve law enforcement standards, improve work style, and strengthen team building”.
Supervision of China’s government by its people, or “mass supervision”, is totally unfamiliar in the West, and might be misread as surveillance.

China does have pervasive surveillance, and the result is that the country is extremely safe, with almost no violence crime. The United States also has pervasive surveillance, but it is extremely violent. On behalf of whom, then, is each government watching?

How China’s elections work
An answer may be found in analyzing the profound differences between China and the US on the role of money in politics, and how it skews democracy.

China does have elections, and for genuine representation, no lobbying or canvassing is allowed.

Following the precepts of democratic elections, “In accordance with the principles of universal suffrage, equal rights, multiple candidates, and secret ballot”, deputies to people’s congresses at the township and county levels are elected by the Chinese people.

These representatives, the deputies closest to the public, make up 94% of the national total, and are entrusted with electing the higher-level representatives. The deputies to people’s congresses at the level of townships and counties elect deputies to people’s congresses of cities; they, in turn, elect deputies at the provincial level, who elect deputies at the national level.

From these grassroots onward, in China, it is meritocracy all the way. Decades of practical experience, usually with increasingly large populations, ensures progressively greater competence, as candidates get the top jobs that require such capacity.

At each level, China’s most important consultative body, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), the government’s main “think tank,” advises the NPC on how to better serve the people.

In the annual “Two Sessions”, held every March, the NPC and CPPCC meet to map out the country’s development path.

The CPPCC acts as a further bridge between the government and the people, with 34 interest groups representing a broad swath of Chinese society. They produce reports, give feedback, and offer proposals and insight for the public good.

In one case from 2013, the Chinese Peasants and Workers Democratic Party, one of China’s eight non-communist parties, proposed the formation of a national-level coordinated network to tackle air pollution.

China then proceeded from its Air Pollution and Control Action Plan to achieve a historic reduction of 35-40% in particulate matter air pollution by 2017.

China’s environmental protections and “green GDP”
In her book Will China Save the Planet?, prominent US environmentalist Barbara Finamore described how China “launched its moon shot in earnest”, offering the most generous purchase subsidies for electric vehicles (officially known as new energy vehicles) out of any country on Earth, other than Norway (which has 0.4% of China’s population).

China’s consultative focus on the environment has only intensified since. The representative groups of the CPPCC chose a proposal to lower carbon emissions in the construction field as its proposal for 2022. At the same time, the “environment and natural resources group” became the first new group to be added to the body since 1993.

It was back in the early 1990s that the Chinese government set up its environmental complaint system. From the period 2001 to 2006, the ratio of the local environmental authorities’ responses to complaints by letters averaged 86-96%, and the ratio of responses to visits was 75-86%.

Xi Jinping previously served as secretary of the Zhejiang Province’s Communist Party Committee, and its highest-ranking official. In 2005, Xi pushed for “not only GDP but also green GDP”, as he described it in his newspaper column. In a green GDP accounting pilot, only Zhejiang and one other province finally published their results.

By 2010, scholars determined that China’s environmental complaint system was succeeding as a “direct connection from the public to the government, employing a ‘closed-loop’ working mechanism involving reporting, acceptance, disposal, and feedback”.

Another channel, the 12369 telephone complaint hotline, was launched in 2009 to further enable public reporting of environmental pollution problems.

In 2015, China’s ubiquitous WeChat messaging app joined in with environmental complaints reporting, bringing the system online in 2017, and “significantly enhancing public participation in reporting environmental concerns”, wrote top academics.

As for government responsiveness, “when analyzing panel data from 295 Chinese cities between 2018 and 2020, the results indicate that environmental complaint reporting significantly contributes to the enhancement of atmospheric environmental quality”, concluded scientific experts.

David Fishman, an expert on China’s energy sector, observed in July that, “as long as the trend for the last few months of declining YoY coal consumption continues, then July 2024 will use less coal than July 2023, ensuring July 2023 goes down in the history books as China’s all-time coal peak”.

This is particularly important considering that the hottest dayglobally ever recorded was in July.

Already back in 2015, China had achieved “undisputed leadership” in the development of renewable energy, according to UN climate chief Christiana Figueres.

The US was “playing catch-up”, even though, as Olivier Petitjean of the Multinationals Observatory has put it, “You can’t hope to tackle the climate crisis without tackling corporate power” — something that the US government can’t be expected to do.

China has faced pushback from fossil fuel interests, too. But this has been less because of corporate greed than because of operators struggling to make a living amid climate change extremes running up against procedural boundaries.

In 2021, “they were buying coal for a really high price and they’re selling power for a fixed low price”, Fishman explained. “And we ended up with these massive blackouts or brownouts across the country in late 2021 with coal generators, lots of capacity, but unable to actually generate enough cash to buy coal and refill their stocks to generate”.

This only further incentivizes China to forge ahead in the transition to renewable energy technologies. And with big capital kept below the government, the fossil fuel industry in China has nothing like the power to resist change that it has in the US.

To make space for renewables, flexibility retrofits will have coal-fired plants in most areas able to ramp down from full capacity all the way to under 30%, and back, across intervals of 8-10 hours, or so. They already receive capacity payments for national security reasonsto cover their losses, while generating less than necessary otherwise, and are looking at a future of decline.

So Chinese government intervention for the public good can be seen not only in the commitment to investment in EVs, but also the clean-up of the residential power supply source.

Meanwhile, the US has responded with 100% tariffs on China’s EVs and 50% duties on its solar panels.



US imperialism vs Chinese socialism
The truth about Chinese socialism, as opposed to US imperialism, is that China’s priority is domestic policy. Its focus is on its people, as epitomized by the mass line policy. From the people to the people; democracy is fundamental.

In fact, President Xi has insisted, “Without democracy, there would be no socialism, socialist modernization, or national rejuvenation”.

While China keeps its army at home, where its people are, US politicians on both sides of the same electoral coin are supporting the genocidal Israeli regime as it massacres Palestinian children, in an attempt to advance US imperial interests in West Asia.

The US government is not ultimately concerned about “legitimacy”, because the North American people have been denied a system of consultative democracy.

The US government is instead focused on maximizing corporate profits, privatizing public institutions, and preparing for more war.

https://orinocotribune.com/us-or-china- ... democracy/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 23, 2024 2:32 pm

How a people’s government defeated a west-backed terrorist insurgency

The success achieved by removing the basis for radicalisation of poor workers shows the wisdom of China’s policy in Xinjiang.

Image
Xinjiang residents hold up a banner that reads: ‘Stability is a blessing’. CPGB-ML party members have returned from a visit to the region with glowing reports of the thriving multi-ethnic society they saw there. One in which all citizens are valued equally; in which the best aspects of their language, culture and heritage are preserved and valued; and in which opportunities for education and a decent life are being opened up to all.
Proletarian writers

Friday 23 August 2024

The average westerner would have had to be living under a rock for the last 15 years not to have been exposed to at least some of the avalanche of accusations that have been levelled against the People’s Republic of China regarding the state of affairs in its westernmost province of Xinjiang.

Throughout this period, it has been regularly and emphatically asserted by western politicians and media that the Communist Party of China (CPC) government is guilty of the most horrific crimes against its own people. It is claimed that the CPC has:

outlawed Islam, suppressed those who practice it and interred millions of muslims in concentration camps;
built a regime characterised by Han chauvinism, treating all China’s other ethnic minorities as second-class citizens;
used forced/slave labour to build industry in Xinjiang;
tried to eradicate the indigenous minorities native to the region, destroying their culture and replacing their populations;
committed a wholesale genocide of the Uyghur muslim minority (although this is now being quietly downgraded to rather vaguer allegations of a ‘cultural genocide’).

Islam in Xinjiang
Islam and the muslim community alike are thriving in Xinjiang. This author had the opportunity to visit the region in July and saw no sign of repression during his time there.

Far from suppressing local ethnicities and their religion, billions of Chinese yuan are being spent by the government on mosques, schools and cultural protection efforts in the region. Far from banned, Islam is receiving huge state subsidies.

The Xinjiang Islamic Institute is one example of this support. Its large college-style campus not only provides practicing muslims with prayer facilities, but also contains a one thousand student-capacity school, complete with a gym, playgrounds and canteens, where imams and other religious leaders can be trained.

The institute has an extensive library containing many islamic texts, which have been translated (at government expense) from Arabic into the local Uyghur language, as well as into Chinese. Newspapers, books on Chinese law and political texts have likewise been translated into local languages for the benefit of the students.

A large sum is being spent by the state on the preservation and renovation of Xinjiang’s existing mosques, some of which date back many centuries. This renovation is carried out in consultation with local muslims and party cadres.

Any objective visitor to Xinjiang (and the province is open to tourists from all over the world) can see for themselves that the west’s wild accusations about the repression of muslims and eradication of Islam have absolutely no basis in reality.

Last year, a group of islamic scholars and experts from 14 countries visited Xinjiang and came away extremely impressed with what they saw. Mestaoui Mohamed Slaheddine, advisor to the Tunisian prime minister and secretary general of the Supreme Islamic Council, gave his impression of the Islamic Institute’s new campus and its elegantly designed prayer hall, saying: “I believe that muslims can feel peace the moment they step in here.” (Global Times, 9 January 2023)

If any criticism were to be made of China’s efforts in Xinjiang, it would not be over suppression of religion but over its active promotion. Rather than upholding the communist principle that religion must become a private matter (a matter kept separate from the state and funded only by those who participate in its congregations), the Chinese government is providing state funds to religious houses.

The result is that instead of allowing religion and religious practices to quietly die out of their own accord as life under socialism erodes the people’s superstitious beliefs, the present CPC policy is providing the basis for religious growth – thus assisting in the creation of a force that has the potential to become a bastion of anti-socialist reaction in the future.

The CPC’s view is that the steps it has taken in Xinjiang have been necessary to counter the urgent situation created by the infiltration of US-funded extremist groups and ideology. Brutal attacks by these west-created fundamentalist terrorists had been killing and injuring large numbers of people, of all ethnic groups, and had led to great instability in the region.

In order to undermine this infiltration, great efforts have been made by the CPC government to cut it off at the root – removing the economic factors that had led to some poor Uyghur muslims becoming fodder for the USA’s terror-gang groomers.

‘Concentration camps’
An oft-repeated slander against China is the imperialists’ accusation that the CPC is guilty of ‘genocide’. Many variations of the claim that “millions of muslims are being held in extermination camps” have been circulating for some time, and have acquired by their frequency the weight of a popular prejudice in the west.

The way these accusations are phrased deliberately aims to conjure images of (and popular revulsion against) the Nazi concentration camps of the 1930s and 40s (although it was actually the British imperialists who invented such camps, and who used them extensively in their colonial wars). US imperialism likewise used methods of mass extermination in removing the indigenous people as it implemented the North American settler-colonial strategy.

Adolf Hitler and his ministers were openly admiring and envious of the successes of British imperialism, both in dominating their colonies and in successfully spreading lies about the true nature of their activities.

Today, we again see such methods being used against the Palestinian people by Anglo-American imperialism’s attack dog in the middle east: Israeli zionism.

All of which is to say that working people the world over have seen enough of imperialism to know that it does indeed commit such horrific crimes against humanity. And that the workers in the west have been lied to so much that they are prey to confusion about who exactly are today’s evil imperialists and who are those striving to defend humanity from imperialist crimes.

https://thecommunists.org/2024/08/23/ne ... nsurgency/

******

Image

China leads world in renewable energy
The following article by Lyn Neeley, first published in Workers World, describes some of China’s achievements on ecological protection. For example, “in 2023 China produced 60% of the world’s electric vehicles, 98% of the world’s electric buses and two-thirds of all the world’s wind and solar projects”. It looks like China will meet its goal of peaking emissions by 2030 ahead of time – indeed the evidence indicates that China’s emissions have already peaked.

Aside from renewable energy, China is the clear world leader in electric vehicles, and Chinese scientists are innovating on a number of fronts including green hydrogen and sustainable cooling materials.

Instead of cooperating with China in response to the climate crisis, “US corporations are threatened by all the Chinese innovations being developed and transforming the world. They know that when privately owned capitalist industries have monopoly control of an industry, their only goal is to maximize profits.”

When the US does invest in renewables, power plants are often built on indigenous lands, without consultation. “China just completed the largest floating solar farm in the world on top of an old coal plant! In contrast, US industries trespass on sovereign Indigenous land to construct solar plants, wind farms, power transmission lines and copper mines for lithium extraction for electric batteries – without consulting with leaders of the Indigenous nations and tribes.”

The contrast reminds us once again that the climate crisis requires socialist solutions.
In 2023 China produced 60% of the world’s electric vehicles, 98% of the world’s electric buses and two-thirds of all the world’s wind and solar projects. Its workers installed more solar panels than they had in the previous three years combined, nearly twice as much as the rest of the world combined.

These figures account for large solar farms that feed directly into the grid. Small solar farms, which make up 40% of China’s solar capacity, make solar power production totals in China much higher. China’s growth in wind power also increased in 2023, faster than in any country except the United States.

China’s goal of peak carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060 may well be reached sooner than expected. The biggest driver of China’s economic growth is innovation and clean energy technology, accounting for 40% of their gross domestic product expansion last year.

Electric vehicles
Chinese EVs now cost $10,000-$15,000 per car on the world market. A few reasons for the drastic price drop of 50% is that Chinese companies are producing their own lithium batteries, which they can produce 51% cheaper. Chinese government subsidies for EVs have risen from $76.7 million in 2018 to $809 million in 2023.

Capitalist industry based in the U.S. is unable to produce and sell EVs at such low prices, and its auto manufacturers are still heavily reliant on expensive cars that burn fossil fuels. The U.S. government is raising tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (now at 25%) to 100% starting Aug. 1. The European Union plans to increase tariffs up to 48% sometime this year.

China supplies 60% of global EV batteries and much of the lithium-ion cell components. “China’s Batteries Are Now Cheap Enough to Power Huge Shifts,” meaning the shift away from combustion engines, is the title of an article in the Bloomberg newsletter. (tinyurl.com/yc74z7ua) This year the U.S. government will increase the tariffs on Chinese batteries up to 25%. It plans to also impose stiff tariffs on semiconductors and raw materials used to make EV cars. (tinyurl.com/7e2szfzv)

Chinese innovations: people before profit
Chinese workers and scientists have created the first seawater electrolysis system that produces hydrogen directly from ocean water using offshore wind power, a renewable energy source. Hydrogen is a clean, versatile fuel that traditionally could only be produced using an expensive high-energy process to first desalinate ocean water.

Chinese researchers have designed a material that reflects the sun’s rays and can be welded together in planks. When attached to the outside surface of buildings, the planks reduce temperatures inside then, cutting down the need for air conditioning and reducing carbon emissions. The plank material is made of gelatin and DNA from organic matter, which can be made biodegradable and converts ultra-violet (UV) radiation into visible light. This plank technology opens the way for further innovative, sustainable cooling materials.

At the end of 2023, China had produced 1.27 million registered drones; these are huge pilot-free cargo planes that can carry a 500-kilogram (1,100-pound) load as far as 500 kilometers (310 miles) with a maximum range of 1,800 kilometers (1,118 miles). They can be used for transportation, fire and rescue teams and flood control and disaster relief work. They are 70% quicker and 30% cheaper than conventional cross-sea transport.

U.S. corporations are threatened by all the Chinese innovations being developed and transforming the world. They know that when privately owned capitalist industries have monopoly control of an industry, their only goal is to maximize profits.

Land back now!
China just completed the largest floating solar farm in the world on top of an old coal plant! In contrast, U.S. industries trespass on sovereign Indigenous land to construct solar plants, wind farms, power transmission lines and copper mines for lithium extraction for electric batteries—​without consulting with leaders of the Indigenous nations and tribes.

U.S.-based industries are still heavily reliant on profits from the fossil fuel economy. The U.S. government, while beginning to invest in renewable fuels, is moving in on Native reservations and sacred lands.

The Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT), which includes the Mohave, Chemehuevi, Hopi and Navajo Nations, is suing the Bureau of Land Management for constructing a solar plant on 4,000 acres of their ancestral homelands. They have been fighting the plans since 2006. The CRIT explained they are not against solar power, but they object to not being consulted—​and because of the effects it will have on the ecosystem, cultural resources, groundwater and the Colorado River. (tinyurl.com/5n8p32ta)

In February, members of the San Carlos Apache Nation in Arizona asked that work stop on the $10 billion construction of a copper mine on the reservation’s sacred territory. Tribal member Verlon Jose said, “We do not disagree with renewable energy, we are for renewable energy. You know what the fix to this issue is? They could have rerouted it. But they didn’t listen.” (Washington Post, March 4)

Native activist, ecologist and author Winona LaDuke added, “In the endless pursuit of energy, once again, Native people are in the eye of the storm.” She calls mines and other projects that could imperil tribal sovereignty “the next Standing Rock.”

https://socialistchina.org/2024/08/21/c ... le-energy/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 31, 2024 1:58 pm

Image

Build global mass opposition to the New Cold War
The following is the text of a speech given by Friends of Socialist China co-editor Carlos Martinez at an online meeting of the Scottish Trade Union Peace Network on 22 August 2024.

Carlos discusses the nature of China’s foreign policy, dealing with common criticisms such as that China seeks to “undermine democracy” in Taiwan, that it is an aggressive and expansionist power in the South China Sea, and that its nuclear arsenal poses a serious threat to world peace.

The speech goes on to analyse the theoretical basis and economic underpinnings of China’s foreign policy, observing that China’s rise “has never been based on dominating the land, labour, resources and markets of the rest of the world. It has never been driven by the expand-or-die logic of capital.”

Carlos concludes by detailing the expanding US-led campaign of containment and encirclement against China, and calling for “progressive and peace-loving people the world over to join hands in building global mass opposition to this insanity”.

Other speakers at the event included Fiona Edwards (No Cold War Britain) and Jonathon Shafi (Stop the War Scotland).
Many thanks for inviting me to join you.

I’m going to focus my remarks on China’s foreign policy, comparing that with the US and Britain’s foreign policy, and then discussing the dangers of this escalating New Cold War, which could all too easily end up as a hot war.

China aggressive?
China of course is framed in the Western media as an “aggressive” and “expansionist” power which is hell-bent on subverting the “rules-based international order”.

According to the NATO Heads of State summit in Washington last month, “China’s stated ambitions and coercive policies continue to challenge our interests, security and values”.

What’s the basis for this characterisation? I’m going to talk about some of common themes:

First, Taiwan. China is accused of undermining democracy in Taiwan and threatening imminent invasion.

The funny thing is that China’s position on the Taiwan question has not meaningfully changed in the last seven decades, and it’s entirely consistent with international law and numerous United Nations resolutions – not to mention the various joint agreements between the US and China.

Taiwan is a part of China. It was seized by Japan in 1895 and returned to Chinese control in 1945, at the end of World War 2, as agreed by Britain, the US, the Soviet Union and China at the Potsdam Conference.

In 1949, having lost in the Chinese Civil War, Chang Kai-shek and his people fled to Taiwan and set up a renegade administration, and the US positioned its Navy – the Seventh Fleet – in the Taiwan Strait to prevent the communist government from reuniting the country. But even then, Taiwan never claimed to be a separate country – the Kuomintang simply said that Taiwan was the real China and that the People’s Republic was the renegade. Indeed that idea is still part of Taiwan’s constitution.

So China’s very consistent position is that Taiwan is part of China. This position – the One China Principle – is accepted by more than 90 percent of the world’s countries, including the US and Britain. China has always said that it seeks peaceful reunification but that it reserves the right to use force in case of outside interference or a unilateral declaration of independence. Furthermore it makes the very reasonable point that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter for Chinese people on both sides of the Strait to resolve.

There is nothing particularly bellicose or unusual about such a position. Frankly, if you’ll excuse the slight provocation, China’s historic claim to Taiwan is far stronger than Britain’s historic claim to Scotland, but does anyone think Westminster would avoid the use of force if Scotland, backed and armed by Russia, say, were to unilaterally declare independence.

So nothing has changed with respect to China’s position on the Taiwan question. What’s changed is that the US and its allies, seeking to provoke conflict and undermine China, are increasing their support for separatist elements, are increasing their supply of weapons to the administration in Taipei, and are steadily rowing back on the One China Principle.

Biden has said multiple times that the US would intervene militarily if Beijing were to attempt to change the status quo by force – which goes directly against what was agreed by the US and China back in the 1970s when relations were re-established. It is essentially a way of signalling: we are building towards war against China, and Taiwan will likely be the flashpoint. And the way we plan to win public support for that war is by presenting it as a war to protect democracy in Taiwan.

Another popular accusation about China’s “aggression” is that it’s engaged in expansionism in the South China Sea, because it patrols its own waters, and because it has a number of complicated territorial disputes over control of an array of tiny uninhabited islands.

The details of the disputes are not particularly relevant for our purposes. These territorial disputes are inherited from previous generations and they’re not easy to resolve. For example, there are numerous disputes in relation to the Arctic Circle, between Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the US. The disputes involving China receive relatively more attention because the US is attempting to leverage them to foment broader anti-China feeling in Southeast Asia and to present China in the most negative light possible.

Again, China hasn’t changed its position on these questions; there has simply been an escalation of anti-China propagandising by the West.

On the South China Sea, it’s worth mentioning that China’s definition of its borders was determined before 1949, before the founding of the People’s Republic. The nine-dash line defining China’s maritime borders was created by the Kuomintang government in 1947, and certainly didn’t cause any stir in Western capitals at the time. After all, China at that time was considered by the West as an important ally in the global war against communism.

The People’s Republic of China has not made a single new territorial claim. And although it patrols the South China Sea and works to protect its trade routes and to prevent any potential blockade being imposed by the US, it has never once impeded international trade.

So when the US carries out its so-called ‘freedom of navigation assertions’ in the South China Sea, it’s not because China is blocking navigation. China is not being aggressive; the US is being aggressive, and according itself the role of world policeman. The US has no jurisdiction in the South China Sea. Can anyone imagine what the US response would be if China carried out freedom of navigation assertions off the coast of California?

Then there’s the question of nuclear weapons. The media is full of alarmist reports about China’s expanding nuclear arsenal. But China has fewer than 500 nuclear warheads, compared to over 5,000 for the US.

China maintains a strictly defensive nuclear posture. Of all the nuclear powers, it is the only one to have a clear policy of no-first use, meaning that it will never use nuclear weapons other than in response to a nuclear attack.

It’s also the only nuclear power to guarantee that it will never use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear country, meaning that it refuses to engage in the type of nuclear blackmail which the US specialises in.

China’s foreign policy
China has peaceful development literally written into its constitution. It maintains a nuclear deterrent because if it didn’t, the US realistically wouldn’t hesitate to wage war against it.

As I said, the US has over 5,000 nuclear warheads, does not have a policy of no-first use, is the only country to ever use nuclear weapons, has threatened to use them numerous times – including against China, during the Korean War – and has a record of waging wars around the world in pursuit of its own economic and geostrategic interests.

China’s whole outlook is very different. Hugo Chávez put it well:

“China is large but it’s not an empire. China doesn’t trample on anyone, it hasn’t invaded anyone, it doesn’t go around dropping bombs on anyone.”

Yes, China has become a major power. It’s the world’s second largest economy. Its people live far better than they used to. It’s a science and technology powerhouse. It’s successfully pursuing modernisation.

That process of modernisation was a violent one in the West. It relied on colonialism, slavery, war, plunder, domination. The same processes that made Europe and North America rich, made Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean and the Pacific poor.

And having won this advantage, the West – these days led by the US – seeks to maintain it through force. That’s why the US maintains over 800 overseas military bases. That’s why it maintains tens of thousands of troops – and nuclear weapons – in Japan, South Korea, Guam and Okinawa. That’s why NATO went to war against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Yugoslavia. That’s why the US waged genocidal wars against Korea and Vietnam. That’s why the US and its allies continue to wage proxy wars even today in Ukraine, in Yemen, in Syria.

There’s a tendency to see China’s rise and assume that it will follow the same aggressive trajectory as Europe, Japan and the United States. And yet China’s rise has been remarkably peaceful. It hasn’t been at war in over 40 years.

China doesn’t have a global infrastructure of hegemony – foreign bases, troops and weapons stationed in other countries. China has one overseas military base, in Djibouti, with the sole purpose of protecting its trade ships from piracy.

By the time Britain or the US were at China’s current stage of development, both were engaged in endless wars of conquest and domination. Both built relationships of outright subjugation with the countries of the Global South.

China follows an entirely different approach to international relations, with the reason that its economic rise has followed a fundamentally different logic. It has never been based on dominating the land, labour, resources and markets of the rest of the world. It has never been driven by the expand-or-die logic of capital.

China is on the cusp of being a high-income country, but China doesn’t wage wars of domination. China doesn’t interfere in other countries’ internal affairs. China doesn’t threaten other countries or engage in destabilisation. China doesn’t impose unilateral sanctions or economic coercion.

Much is made of China’s economic power, and yet its loans and investment throughout Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and elsewhere are generally speaking welcome, because they come with a low rate of interest, there’s no conditions of austerity (unlike the IMF’s notorious structural adjustment programs), and because they’re used to fund crucial infrastructure projects that are allowing countries to break out of underdevelopment after centuries of colonial and neocolonial exploitation.

For example, with Chinese finance and support, Ethiopia opened the first metro system in sub-Saharan Africa a few years ago.

With Chinese finance and support, Bolivia launched a telecoms satellite that provides connectivity to the whole country – the poorest country in South America.

China built the new African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa, a gift from the Chinese government.

The same with the new headquarters of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

Then contrast China and the US when it comes to the Middle East. The US and its allies have fought devastating – genocidal – wars in order to control the natural resources of that region.

In Iraq there’s a popular saying: “the US bombs, while China builds”. In no area of life is that more true than with schools. The US bombed literally hundreds of schools during the Iraq War. China is currently building literally thousands of schools in Iraq.

In Ukraine, the US did everything it could to bring about this conflict, and now it’s doing everything it can to keep the conflict going – to “fight Russia to the last Ukrainian”. China, in coordination with Brazil, the African Union and others, is leading efforts to find a solution to the crisis based on dialogue and negotiation.

What about the tragic situation in Gaza, where over 40,000 people – and in all likelihood at least twice that – have been murdered by a brutal apartheid regime, using weapons in large part supplied by the US and Britain. The Western powers could have stopped this genocide in the space of a day if they’d cut off the supply of weapons to Israel, if they’d imposed sanctions on Israel.

China is increasingly recognised as the credible peace broker in relation to Palestine. It’s been a loud and consistent voice in the international community condemning Israel’s onslaught and demanding an unconditional ceasefire. It insists on the restoration of the fundamental national rights of the Palestinian people, and, very significantly, recently mediated an agreement between 14 Palestinian resistance movements, with the rationale that Palestinians need the maximum level of unity if they’re going to win their rights.

So this idea that China is an aggressive power, or that one can put an equals sign between Chinese and US foreign policy, simply has no reasonable basis.

Encirclement
Meanwhile, we’re seeing the US and its allies pushing a New Cold War, along with an escalating campaign of containment and encirclement of China.

This includes economic, diplomatic and propaganda aspects, including sanctions, a trade war, the chip war and other attempts to prevent China from modernising, tariffs, and so on.

But it also includes a significant military component: the increasing presence of NATO warships in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait; the creation of AUKUS, the nuclear pact between Britain, the US and Australia, with a clear objective of confronting China; the defence agreements between the US, Japan and South Korea; the installation of new US military bases in the Philippines; encouraging the remilitarisation of Japan; increasing the transfer of weapons to Taiwan; and deploying the Terminal High Altitude Area Defence system in South Korea and Guam.

‘Cold Wars’ sound relatively benign, relatively innocuous, but they can turn hot, and the US and its allies are actively putting the pieces in place for this New Cold War to turn hot. Meanwhile the original Cold War wasn’t particularly cold in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, Angola, Brazil, Chile, Nicaragua, and elsewhere. Many millions of people lost their lives, and whole countries were destroyed, within this framework of Cold War.

Fight for peace
The vast majority of the people of the world don’t want war, hot or cold. What we need is global cooperation.

Humanity faces serious existential threats in the form of climate breakdown, pandemics, antimicrobial resistance, and the possibility of nuclear war.

To face up to these threats, we need to work collectively and within a framework of multipolarity, the UN Charter, and international law. The US’s insistence – and unfortunately this a bipartisan phenomenon, please don’t think Kamala Harris is going to save us – on maintaining its hegemony, on pursuing a Project for a New American Century, is a serious impediment to securing a safe future for humanity.

As such, it’s crucial and urgent that that progressive and peace-loving people the world over join hands in building global mass opposition to this insanity.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/08/28/b ... -cold-war/

Image

Xi: Deng Xiaoping was a great Marxist, strategist, diplomat, and long-tested communist fighter
The Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee held a symposium on the morning of August 22 at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People to commemorate the 120th birth anniversary of Comrade Deng Xiaoping. Chinese President Xi Jinping made an important speech there.

Xi emphasised that Comrade Deng Xiaoping is recognised by the entire Party, the military, and the people of all ethnic groups across the country as an outstanding leader with high prestige, a great Marxist, a great proletarian revolutionary, statesman, military strategist, diplomat, and a long-tested communist fighter. Deng was the core of the second generation of the Party’s central collective leadership, the chief architect of China’s socialist reform, opening up and modernisation, the trailblazer of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and the principal creator of Deng Xiaoping Theory. He made significant contributions to world peace and development as a great internationalist. And he made outstanding contributions to the Party, the people, the country, the nation, and the world.

Xi further noted that Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s life was a glorious, fighting and extraordinary one. Deng made outstanding contributions to the Party-led causes of national independence and people’s liberation, and to the founding of the People’s Republic of China. He carried out highly effective work in establishing the socialist system and advancing socialist construction. After the end of the Cultural Revolution, as the core of the second generation of the Party’s central collective leadership, Deng led the Party and the people in achieving a historic shift, drove a new leap forward in adapting Marxism to the Chinese context, broke new ground in socialist modernisation, set a right path for realising China’s complete reunification, firmly upheld the splendid banner of socialism, and successfully initiated socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Xi emphasised that Deng’s historical achievements are comprehensive and groundbreaking, with profound and lasting impact on both China and the world. Deng’s lifelong journey of struggle fully demonstrated his unwavering commitment to the lofty ideals of communism and the belief in socialism with Chinese characteristics, his deep love for the people, his adherence to the principle of seeking truth from facts, his political courage in continuous innovation, his far-sighted strategic thinking, and his broad-mindedness and selflessness.

Referring to Deng’s early life, Xi said that in the face of the profound national disasters of feudal rule and corruption, the invasion of Western powers, and the starvation and cold of the people, the young Deng Xiaoping actively participated in the mass struggle in his hometown, and later went to Europe to work and study, firmly chose Marxism, and joined the Communist Party of China.

An important section of Xi’s speech dealt with the events of 1989:

“Comrade Deng Xiaoping firmly defended the glorious banner of socialism. In the process of reform and opening up, he always took a clear-cut stand against bourgeois liberalisation. Against the backdrop of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the drastic changes in Eastern Europe, a serious political turmoil occurred in China at the turn of the spring and summer of 1989. At the critical moment, Comrade Deng Xiaoping led the party and the people to take a clear-cut stand against turmoil and resolutely defend the socialist state power, so that the party and the country withstood the severe test of dangerous winds and waves. After that, he profoundly summed up the lessons in the process of reform and opening up, and stressed the need to concentrate on party building, strengthen ideological and political work and education in fine traditions, improve the party’s leadership level and ruling ability, and ensure the stability of the red country. He admonished the people with a deafening voice: ‘Socialism in China cannot be changed. China will certainly follow the socialist road it has chosen to the end. No one can crush us.'”

Xi continued: “Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s historical exploits are all-round and groundbreaking, and their impact on China and the world is profound and long-term. In the course of his life’s struggle, he fully demonstrated his lofty character of incomparably firm belief in the lofty ideals of communism and socialism with Chinese characteristics, his great feelings of incomparable love for the people, the theoretical quality of always seeking truth from facts, the political courage to constantly blaze new trails, his far-sighted strategic thinking, and his frank and selfless broad-mindedness. His great historical exploits will always be remembered. His noble revolutionary demeanour will always be admired by us!”

He added: “Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, everything we have done is to fulfil the original mission of the party, to complete the unfinished business of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and other revolutionaries of the older generation, and to uphold and develop socialism with Chinese characteristics under the conditions of the new era. The times are constantly advancing, the cause is constantly developing, and theoretical and practical innovation cannot be stopped for a moment. Comrade Deng Xiaoping said: ‘China should have something new every year, and something new every day.’ It is the solemn historical responsibility of the contemporary Chinese Communists to constantly open up a new realm of Sinicisation and modernisation of Marxism. In the new era and new journey, we must adhere to integrity and innovation, never forget our ancestors, always take the right path, be good at breaking new paths, make the tree of theory evergreen and the tree of our cause evergreen, and constantly comfort the older generation of revolutionaries with new deeds and new achievements.”

Towards the end of his speech, he stated: “At this moment, I am reminded of two remarks made by Comrade Deng Xiaoping: First, ‘by the next century and 50 years, if we basically achieve modernisation, we can further assert the success of socialism.’ The second is that ‘by the middle of the next century, it will be able to approach the level of the developed countries in the world, and that will be the big change. At that time, the weight and role of Socialist China will be different, and we will be able to make greater contributions to humanity.'”

Deng’s remark here about making greater contributions to humanity is derived from Mao Zedong’s 1956 article commemorating the 90th birthday of Dr. Sun Yat-Sen:

“Things are always progressing. It is only forty-five years since the Revolution of 1911, but the face of China has entirely changed. In another forty-five years, that is, by the year 2001, at the beginning of the 21st century, China will have undergone an even greater change. It will have become a powerful industrial socialist country. And that is as it should be. China is a land with an area of 9,600,000 square kilometres and a population of 600 million, and it ought to make a greater contribution to humanity. But for a long time in the past its contribution was far too small. For this we are regretful.”

We reproduce below a report on the symposium that was originally published by the Xinhua News Agency. We also carry the full text of the important speech of Xi Jinping. This was issued by Xinhua and published in Chinese in People’s Daily. It has been machine translated and lightly edited by us.
Xi urges advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics at symposium held to mark Deng Xiaoping’s 120th birth anniversary

The Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee held a symposium on the morning of Aug. 22 at the Great Hall of the People to commemorate the 120th birth anniversary of Comrade Deng Xiaoping. Chinese President Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the CPC Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), delivered an important speech. Xi emphasized that Comrade Deng Xiaoping is recognized by the entire Party, the military, and the people of all ethnic groups across the country as an outstanding leader with high prestige, a great Marxist, a great proletarian revolutionary, statesman, military strategist, diplomat, and a long-tested communist fighter. Deng was the core of the second generation of the Party’s central collective leadership, the chief architect of China’s socialist reform, opening up and modernization, the trailblazer of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and the principal creator of Deng Xiaoping Theory. He made significant contributions to world peace and development as a great internationalist. Deng made outstanding contributions to the Party, the people, the country, the nation, and the world. Deng’s achievements have been immortalized in history and will always inspire future generations.

The symposium was attended by members of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee Zhao Leji, Wang Huning, Ding Xuexiang, and Li Xi, as well as Vice President Han Zheng. The symposium was presided over by Cai Qi, also a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee.

In his speech, Xi noted that Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s life was a glorious, fighting and extraordinary one. Deng made outstanding contributions to the Party-led causes of national independence and people’s liberation, and to the founding of the People’s Republic of China. He carried out highly effective work in establishing the socialist system and advancing socialist construction. After the end of the Cultural Revolution, as the core of the second generation of the Party’s central collective leadership, Deng led the Party and the people in achieving a historic shift, drove a new leap forward in adapting Marxism to the Chinese context, broke new ground in socialist modernization, set a right path for realizing China’s complete reunification, firmly upheld the splendid banner of socialism, and successfully initiated socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Xi emphasized that Deng’s historical achievements are comprehensive and groundbreaking, with profound and lasting impact on both China and the world. Deng’s lifelong journey of struggle fully demonstrated his unwavering commitment to the lofty ideals of communism and the belief in socialism with Chinese characteristics, his deep love for the people, his adherence to the principle of seeking truth from facts, his political courage in continuous innovation, his far-sighted strategic thinking, and his broad-mindedness and selflessness. We will forever remember his great historical achievements and forever revere his noble revolutionary conduct.

Xi highlighted that the most important intellectual legacy left to us by Comrade Deng Xiaoping is Deng Xiaoping Theory, which he primarily developed. Deng Xiaoping Theory represents a significant milestone in the process of adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. As we embark on a new journey of the new era, we must continue to thoroughly study and apply Deng Xiaoping Theory, fully and accurately grasp its scientific essence and core principles. This involves both adhering to the major conclusions, fundamental viewpoints, and correct propositions Deng Xiaoping made based on his understanding of the laws of socialism, and correctly grasping the theory’s core and essence in light of changing circumstances to solve contemporary problems. This ensures our unwavering commitment to truth and our consistent application of theory in practice.

We must always uphold Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory, the Theory of Three Represents, and the Scientific Outlook on Development, and fully implement the Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. It is essential to steadfastly maintain Marxism as our guiding principle and China’s fine traditional culture as our foundation, and learn from and absorb the outstanding achievements of human civilization. By continuously exploring truth and addressing the practical issues in advancing Chinese modernization, we can profoundly answer the questions posed by China, the world, the people, and the times. This will further advance the adaptation of Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times, allowing the Marxism of contemporary China and of the 21st century to shine with even greater brilliance.

Xi emphasized that the best way to honor Comrade Deng Xiaoping is to continue advancing the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics that he initiated. We must focus on the central task of building a great country and national rejuvenation on all fronts through a Chinese path to modernization, carrying forward the legacy and striving for progress. It is essential to uphold fundamental principles and break new ground, further deepen reforms comprehensively, and continuously provide robust momentum and institutional guarantees for Chinese modernization.

We must prioritize high-quality development as the primary task, fully, accurately, and comprehensively implement the new development philosophy, and advance the coordinated implementation of the Five-Sphere Integrated Plan and the Four-Pronged Comprehensive Strategy. We must move faster to build a modernized economy, work toward greater self-reliance in the science and technology sector, vigorously develop advanced socialist culture, and boost material and cultural-ethical advancement and harmony between humanity and nature.

We must adhere to the principle of putting people first, develop whole-process people’s democracy, build a higher level of the rule of law in China, and ensure that development is accompanied by the safeguarding and improvement of people’s livelihoods, thus making substantial progress toward common prosperity for all. We should also promote high-standard opening up to the outside world, steadily expand institutional openness, boost high-quality development of the Belt and Road Initiative, and balance openness with security to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests.

We must unswervingly advance the full and rigorous self-governance of the Party, improve the system for Party self-discipline, and resolutely win the tough and protracted battle against corruption. This ensures that the Party will never change its nature, its conviction, or its character, and it is always the firm core leadership guiding the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Xi noted that realizing China’s complete reunification has long been the aspiration of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and other members of the older generation of revolutionaries, a common will of Chinese people both at home and overseas, and an unstoppable historical trend. We should fully, faithfully, and resolutely implement the policy of “one country, two systems,” under which the people of Hong Kong administer Hong Kong and the people of Macao administer Macao, both with a high degree of autonomy. We should support and promote the further integration of Hong Kong and Macao into the country’s overall development, enabling them to achieve better development. We should resolutely implement the Party’s overall policy framework for resolving the Taiwan question in the new era, adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, promote the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, and oppose “Taiwan independence” to safeguard China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, Xi said.

Xi stressed that China has always been a staunch force for world peace. We should always uphold peace, development, cooperation and mutual benefit, advance the building of a human community with a shared future, and champion humanity’s shared values. We should implement the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative and the Global Civilization Initiative, take an active role in the reform and development of the global governance system, and create new opportunities for the world with new progress in advancing Chinese modernization, Xi said.

While presiding over the meeting, Cai Qi said that General Secretary Xi’s important speech profoundly reviewed the glorious, fighting, and great life of Comrade Deng Xiaoping. Xi’s speech lauded the great historical achievements of Deng in leading the CPC and the Chinese people to usher in the new period of reform and opening up, and socialist modernization, in initiating socialism with Chinese characteristics, and in establishing Deng Xiaoping Theory. Xi’s speech emphasized the need to faithfully study and apply Deng Xiaoping Theory, to learn from Deng’s noble revolutionary demeanor, and to carry forward the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics that Deng initiated. The speech is insightful, profound, and of political, ideological and theoretical significance. It is of great importance to guiding the Party to uphold and develop socialism with Chinese characteristics under new conditions in the new era. We should earnestly study, grasp, and thoroughly implement Xi’s speech, and jointly strive to build a strong country and realize national rejuvenation on all fronts through Chinese modernization.

At the symposium, Qu Qingshan, president of the Institute of Party History and Literature of the CPC Central Committee, Miao Hua, a member of the CMC and director of the Political Work Department of the CMC, and Wang Xiaohui, secretary of the Sichuan Provincial Committee of the CPC, delivered speeches in turn.

Members of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee in Beijing, members of the Secretariat of the CPC Central Committee, as well as relevant leading officials from the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the State Council, the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, and the CMC attended the symposium.

Also in attendance were leading officials from relevant central authorities, the Beijing municipal government and the Sichuan Provincial Committee of the CPC, representatives of central committees of non-CPC parties, the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce, and personages without party affiliation, relatives of Deng Xiaoping, his former staff and representatives from his hometown, and participants of a national academic seminar to commemorate the 120th birth anniversary of Deng Xiaoping.

Speech at a forum to commemorate the 120th anniversary of Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s birth
Comrades and friends,

Today, we are solemnly gathered here to commemorate the 120th anniversary of the birth of our beloved Comrade Deng Xiaoping.

Comrade Deng Xiaoping was an outstanding leader of high prestige recognised by the whole party, the whole army, and the people of all nationalities in the country, a great Marxist, a great proletarian revolutionary, statesman, military strategist, and diplomat, a time-tested communist fighter, the core of the party’s second-generation central leadership collective, the chief architect of China’s socialist reform, opening up, and modernisation, the pioneer of the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics, the main founder of Deng Xiaoping Theory, and a great internationalist who made major contributions to world peace and development.

Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s life was a glorious life, a life of fighting, and a great life, and he made outstanding contributions to the party, the people, the country, the nation, and the world.

Comrade Deng Xiaoping was born in Guang’an County, Sichuan Province. In the face of the profound national disasters of feudal rule and corruption, the invasion of Western powers, and the starvation and cold of the people, the young Deng Xiaoping actively participated in the mass struggle in his hometown, and later went to Europe to work and study, firmly chose Marxism, and joined the Communist Party of China.

In 1927, Comrade Deng Xiaoping returned from the Soviet Union to participate in the struggle for the new democratic revolution led by the party. He successively led the launch of the Baise Uprising and the Longzhou Uprising, established the Zuojiang Revolutionary Base Area, participated in the relevant work of the Central Revolutionary Base Area, and personally experienced the Long March and the Zunyi Conference. During the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the War of Liberation, together with Liu Bocheng, Chen Yi and other comrades, he successively opened up the Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong, and Henan anti-Japanese base areas, led his troops to leap thousands of miles into the Dabie Mountains, organised and implemented the Huaihai Campaign and the River Crossing Campaign, and made outstanding contributions to the cause of national independence and people’s liberation under the leadership of the party and the establishment of New China.

At the beginning of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, Comrade Deng Xiaoping served as the principal responsible person of the Southwest Bureau of the CPC Central Committee. Together with Comrades Liu Bocheng and He Long, he led his troops to liberate the great southwest, led the building of political power, participated in the work of leading the march into Tibet and the peaceful liberation of Tibet, and brought about earth-shaking changes in the southwest region.

After July 1952, Comrade Deng Xiaoping served as Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee, member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, and Vice Premier of the People’s Republic of China. At the First Plenary Session of the Eighth CPC Central Committee in 1956, he was elected as a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee, becoming an important member of the first generation of the party’s central leadership collective with Comrade Mao Zedong as the core. In the following 10 years, he was responsible for a large part of the daily work of the Party Central Committee, put forward many correct propositions and carried out fruitful work for the establishment of the socialist system and socialist construction, and for the strengthening and improvement of Party building. Soon after the Cultural Revolution began, he was wrongly criticised and struggled against, and was stripped of all his positions. In 1973, he resumed his work. In 1975, he began to preside over the daily work of the party, the state, and the army, and, in order to reverse the serious chaos caused by the ‘Cultural Revolution’, he carried out a comprehensive rectification in a big way, and waged a-for-tat struggle against the ‘Gang of Four’. Soon, he was wrongly removed and criticised again, but he remained unswervingly committed to communism and socialism.

After the end of the ‘Cultural Revolution’, Comrade Deng Xiaoping, as the core of the party’s second-generation central leadership collective, led the party and the people to successfully usher in a new period of China’s reform, opening up, and socialist modernisation, and to create socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Comrade Deng Xiaoping led a great historical turning point. Shortly after the end of the ‘Cultural Revolution’, Comrade Deng Xiaoping resumed his old post. At the important historical juncture when the party and the country were facing the question of where to go, he stressed that seeking truth from facts, the mass line, and independence are the quintessence of Mao Zedong Thought, took a clear-cut stand against the erroneous viewpoint of ‘two whatevers’, led and supported the discussion on the issue of the criterion of truth, promoted the rectification of chaos in all quarters, and called on the whole party and the people of the whole country to unite and look forward. Under his guidance, the Third Plenary Session of the 11th CPC Central Committee re-established the ideological line of emancipating the mind and seeking truth from facts, stopped using the erroneous formulation of ‘taking class struggle as the key link’, and made the historic decision to shift the focus of the work of the party and the state to economic construction and to carry out reform and opening up, thus bringing about a great turning point of far-reaching significance in the party’s history.
Comrade Deng Xiaoping promoted a new leap forward in the Sinicisation of Marxism. He led the whole party to profoundly sum up the positive and negative experiences since the founding of New China, constantly promote theoretical innovations, and put forward many major ideas of pioneering significance. Under his auspices, the Sixth Plenary Session of the 11th CPC Central Committee adopted the ‘Resolution on Several Issues in the Party’s History Since the Founding of the People’s Republic of China’, which correctly appraised Comrade Mao Zedong’s historical status and the scientific system of Mao Zedong Thought, completely negated the erroneous practice and theory of the ‘Cultural Revolution’, stressed the need to uphold and develop Mao Zedong Thought, and set the correct direction for the development of the party and the country. At the 12th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, he clearly proposed to “take our own road and build socialism with Chinese characteristics.” According to Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s thought, the 13th National Congress of the Communist Party of China systematically expounded the theory of the primary stage of socialism and completely summarised the party’s basic line in the primary stage of socialism. The 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s theory on building socialism with Chinese characteristics. The 15th CPC National Congress established Deng Xiaoping Theory as the party’s guiding ideology. Deng Xiaoping Theory profoundly answered the fundamental question of what socialism is and how to build it, profoundly revealed the essence of socialism, provided a guide for action for China’s reform, opening up, and socialist modernisation, and is the foundation of the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
Comrade Deng Xiaoping led the party and the people to open up a new situation in socialist modernisation. He clearly put forward the ideas of “building a moderately prosperous society” and “embarking on a Chinese-style road to modernisation” and guided our party in formulating a “three-step” development strategy for modernisation. He led our party to carry out structural reforms in all aspects in a timely and resolute manner, and bravely opened the door to opening up to the outside world. He pointed out that science and technology are the primary productive forces, advocated respect for knowledge and talent, and promoted the development of education, science, and culture. He attached importance to the building of democracy and the legal system and promoted the reform of the party and state leadership system and institutional reform. He stressed the need to build the people’s army into a powerful, modernised, and regularised revolutionary army and take the road of elite troops with Chinese characteristics. He clearly pointed out that peace and development are the two major issues in the contemporary world and led our party to readjust its foreign policies in various fields in a timely manner, thus creating a favourable external environment for reform, opening up, and socialist modernisation. Under his guidance and promotion, China has opened a new situation of leaping from relatively backward productive forces to rapid economic development, and the people’s living standards have leaped from insufficient food and clothing to being overall well-off.
Comrade Deng Xiaoping established the correct path for realising the complete reunification of the motherland. Focusing on the fundamental, whole, and long-term interests of the Chinese nation, he gave full consideration to history and the current situation, creatively put forward the great concept of ‘one country, two systems’, and opened up a new path for realising the complete reunification of the motherland by peaceful means. Under the guidance of this great idea, the Chinese government has resumed the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao, washing away the century-old humiliation of the Chinese nation. In view of the plot to split China, he stressed that we must not give up settling the Taiwan issue by non-peaceful means and put forward the correct policy for settling the Taiwan issue. We have strengthened cross-strait economic and cultural exchanges and cooperation, resolutely opposed and curbed the ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist forces, and firmly grasped the leading power and initiative in the development of cross-strait relations.
Comrade Deng Xiaoping firmly defended the glorious banner of socialism. In the process of reform and opening up, he always took a clear-cut stand against bourgeois liberalisation. Against the backdrop of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the drastic changes in Eastern Europe, a serious political turmoil occurred in China at the turn of the spring and summer of 1989. At the critical moment, Comrade Deng Xiaoping led the party and the people to take a clear-cut stand against turmoil and resolutely defend the socialist state power, so that the party and the country withstood the severe test of dangerous winds and waves. After that, he profoundly summed up the lessons in the process of reform and opening up, and stressed the need to concentrate on party building, strengthen ideological and political work and education in fine traditions, improve the party’s leadership level and ruling ability, and ensure the stability of the red country. He admonished the people with a deafening voice: “Socialism in China cannot be changed. China will certainly follow the socialist road it has chosen to the end. No one can crush us.”
Comrades and friends!

Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s historical exploits are all-round and groundbreaking, and their impact on China and the world is profound and long-term. In the course of his life’s struggle, he fully demonstrated his lofty character of incomparably firm belief in the lofty ideals of communism and socialism with Chinese characteristics, his great feelings of incomparable love for the people, the theoretical quality of always seeking truth from facts, the political courage to constantly blaze new trails, his far-sighted strategic thinking, and his frank and selfless broad-mindedness. His great historical exploits will always be remembered. His noble revolutionary demeanour will always be admired by us!

https://socialistchina.org/2024/08/26/x ... t-fighter/

(Conclusion at link.

I recall that while on Twitter "Dengist" was the deadliest insult that the NYC 'Maoists' could hurl. 'Nuff said.)

*****

Beijing and Washington Clash Over Russia Sanctions
Posted on August 30, 2024 by Yves Smith

Yves here. We’ve posting an article from US propaganda information outlet RFE/RFL below as a critical thinking exercise. The piece does wind up highlighting how the US idea of diplomacy seems to equate to coercion. The US imposed yet more sanctions on China, of companies the US depicts as supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine, right before Jake Sullivan went to Beijing for a summit. That visit which included a meeting with President Xi Jinping.

Readers will note that the RFE/RFL account, consistent with the headline we have reproduced above, focuses on China not cooperating with US sanctions on Russia, which China correctly depicts as illegal (by virtue of not having been approved by the UN). It does not mention US economic sanctions on China, particularly on chips and EV tariffs, which look to be to be mainly to try to stymie Chinese development.

By contrast, the stories on the English language Chinese outlet, Global Times, don’t even dignify the US carping about Russia with a mention. That reflects the Chinese position that China’s dealing with other countries are none of the US’ business. See the article, US should view China’s devt in a rational light, Xi tells Sullivan and the editorial, Hope US will also use ‘three responsibilities’ to benchmark its actions, for confirmation. There is only an indirect reference in editorial, mention the sanctions and decrying “camp confrontation”

Some additional takes on the Sullivan visit:

China and the US have made no progress in finding a solution to the Ukrainian crisis, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said. They also failed to come up with any plan. Sullivan arrived in China on 8/27 and met with Xi Jinping and the Foreign Minister.

Jake Sullivan’s three day China visit ended with talks with Xi Jinping.

Sullivan repeated warnings to China on areas such as Ukraine, “unfair trade”, Taiwan and the South China Sea.

It’s clear diplomacy is just another tool for U.S. power projection and China knows it.[/i]

You just shattered Chinese exports of EVs & steel/aluminum to Canada & you want help from Xi on Ukraine?

Sullivan must be delusional!


By RFE/RL. Cross posted from OilPrice

*The US imposed sanctions on Chinese firms believed to be supporting Russia’s war effort, leading to a diplomatic dispute ahead of Jake Sullivan’s visit to Beijing.
*Sullivan’s trip aims to address a range of issues including tensions in the South China Sea, China’s cooperation with Russia, and the conflict in the Middle East.
*Azerbaijan is strengthening ties with China through strategic partnerships and seeking membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS group.
*Beijing called recent U.S. sanctions on its companies over the Ukraine war “illegal and unilateral” and “not based on facts,” as White House national-security adviser Jake Sullivan arrived in China for several days of high-level talks.

Here’s what’s going on.

Finding Perspective: Washington has repeatedly warned Beijing over its support for Russia’s defense industrial base and has already issued hundreds of sanctions aimed at curbing Moscow’s ability to exploit certain technologies for military purposes.

The United States imposed sanctions on more than 400 entities and individuals for supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine on August 23, including Chinese firms that U.S. officials believe are helping Moscow skirt Western sanctions and build up its military.

One hundred and twenty-three entities were also added to the U.S. export control list known as the Entity List, which forces suppliers to obtain licenses before shipping to targeted companies. Among those added in this most recent batch, 63 entities were based in Russia and 42 in China.

On August 27, ahead of Sullivan’s arrival that same day, Li Hui, China’s special envoy for Eurasian affairs, who has done four rounds of shuttle diplomacy, criticized the sanctions at a briefing for diplomats in Beijing after the latest round of meetings with officials from Brazil, Indonesia, and South Africa.

China has been striving to present itself as a party that is actively looking for a solution to the war in Ukraine, despite skipping a key peace conference in Switzerland this June.

After past rounds of talks led by Li in the spring, Beijing put forward proposals on supporting the exchange of prisoners of war, opposing the use of nuclear and biological weapons, and opposing armed attacks on civilian nuclear facilities, as well as an outline for principles to end the war in February 2023.

Sullivan In China: Sullivan’s trip comes at a time of high tensions in the U.S.-China relationship, with issues like Taiwan, the war in Ukraine, and tensions in the South China Sea flaring up.

The trip is Sullivan’s fifth meeting with Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who is also the director of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee Foreign Affairs Commission Office. As the Financial Times recently reported, both officials have been engaged in secret backchannel talks since 2023 following a low point in ties after an incident with a Chinese spy balloon flying over the United States.

The two officials are expected to discuss a litany of issues in Beijing, including tensions in the South China Sea, China’s growing cooperation with Russia, and conflict in the Middle East.

Why It Matters: Talks between Washington and Beijing are never easy and both sides have lots to talk about, but Russia and the war in Ukraine are high on the agenda.

When U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Beijing in April, he warned that Washington would act if China did not stop supplying Russia with microchips and machine parts to build weapons used in Ukraine.

He also accused his Chinese counterparts of “helping to fuel the biggest threat” to European security since the Cold War.

Since then, Chinese companies have been hit with a raft of measures and the threat of further secondary sanctions on other Chinese entities have led to Chinese banks tightening their restrictions on payments from Russia.

Both Sullivan and Wang are hoping to set up a framework for stable relations between their two governments despite their laundry list of issues.

During comments about U.S.-China relations in January at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, Sullivan said that he and Wang continued to have “direct” conversations on leading issues, including Ukraine and Russia.

“”Both of us left feeling that we didn’t agree or see eye-to-eye on everything but that there was a lot of work to carry forward,” Sullivan .

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/08 ... tions.html

In the meantime China cuts off supply of drone components to Ukraine. How 'bout that, Blinken you dumb-ass?
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:20 pm

Image

China at the forefront of the green energy revolution
The following article by Carlos Martinez, written for the journal Communist Review, describes China’s progress in the field of environmental protection and sustainable development.

The article gives a brief overview of the science around climate change, and introduces China’s long-term strategy of building an ecological civilisation. It goes on to give a detailed description of China’s remarkable trajectory in renewable energy and green transport, as well as afforestation and biodiversity protection.

Carlos notes that the fruits of China’s innovation and research are being shared at a global level, citing a Financial Times editorial saying that “when it comes to climate change, Beijing’s green advances should be seen as positive for China, and for the world”. Indeed China’s investment in wind and solar power has already brought costs down by as much as 90 percent. With the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) increasingly becoming a ‘Green Belt and Road’, China is supplying renewable energy infrastructure to countries around the world, particularly the Global South, providing an opportunity for many poorer countries to leapfrog the fossil fuel stage of development.

The article concludes by noting that China’s achievements in green energy are built on the basis of political economy:

China’s enormous investments have largely been made by state banks, and many of its key projects carried out by state-owned enterprises, according to strategic guidelines laid out by the government. This is possible because of the basic structure and planned nature of the Chinese economy. Which is to say, the fundamental reason China has emerged as the undisputed leader in the fight against climate breakdown is its socialist system.

Yet even in the capitalist West, “China’s example can be used to help create mass pressure to stop our governments and ruling classes from destroying the planet, and to encourage sensible cooperation with China on environmental issues.”
It is by now almost universally understood that humans need to transition away from fossil fuels and adopt renewable energy if we are to avoid catastrophic levels of climate change. As Hannah Ritchie, Deputy Editor and Lead Researcher at Our World in Data, says:

“Global temperatures are rising. Sea levels are rising; ice sheets are melting; and other species are struggling to adapt to a changing climate. Humans face an avalanche of problems from flooding and drought to wildfires and fatal heatwaves. Farmers are at risk of crop failures. Cities are at risk of being submerged. There’s one main cause: human emissions of greenhouse gases.[1]

The science is clear and widely accepted: human activity, most importantly the burning of fossil fuels, has increased the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to an unprecedented level. This has led to more heat being trapped within the Earth’s atmosphere (that is, less heat is being radiated back into space), resulting in a global heating effect, which leads to more frequent and severe weather events, rising sea levels, and shifts in ecosystems.

Data from the ice core record, going back around 800,000 years, shows that carbon dioxide concentration has fluctuated quite widely, between around 170 and 280 parts per million (ppm), with a previous peak at 300 ppm around 320,000 years ago. CO₂ levels have been stable at around 270 ppm for the last ten thousand years, until a significant upward curve starting in the early 1800s and accelerating sharply from the 1950s onwards.[2] At the time of writing (June 2024), carbon dioxide concentration is 424 ppm.

Greenhouse gas concentration will continue to increase, and the corresponding ecological problems will get significantly worse, unless we either reduce our consumption of energy to an extraordinary degree or we switch to non-emitting forms of energy. The idea of reducing humanity’s overall energy consumption is not plausible. For the majority of the world’s population, low energy consumption correlates to poverty; to low standards of living. Clearly, socialists hope that most people in the developing world, over the course of the coming decades, will increase rather than decrease their consumption of energy, and will experience a corresponding improvement in quality of life. As such, the only realistic option for preventing climate breakdown whilst continuing to pursue development is to undertake a massive global transition to green energy: to meet humanity’s energy needs without releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and without causing permanent damage to the environment.

China’s changing role
Much is made by Western journalists and politicians of the fact that China is the world’s biggest overall emitter of carbon dioxide, having overtaken the US in 2007.[3] Of course, this is not a criticism made in good faith: the Western powers have made insufficient progress in decarbonising their economies, and now aim to pin the blame on China. For example, Wopke Hoekstra, EU commissioner for climate action, commented in 2023: “I’m saying to China and others that have experienced significant economic growth and truly higher wealth than 30 years ago, that with this comes responsibility”.[4] US President Joe Biden famously claimed in his closing statement to the G20 summit in 2021 that China “basically didn’t show up in terms of any commitments to deal with climate change”, further stating that meaningful progress on climate change negotiations is “going to require us to continue to focus on what China’s not doing”.[5]

Such a position is obviously not tenable. China’s per capita emissions are around half those of the US, Canada and Australia.[6] Meanwhile, China is a developing country, with a per-capita income a quarter of that of the US. Unlike the increasingly post-industrial West, China is still undergoing modernisation and industrialisation. It is industrialisation, and the corresponding improvement in living standards, that drives China’s greenhouse gas emissions – not luxury consumption.

Emissions have started to reduce in Britain and the US over the last 20 years, but these countries continue to have an outsized responsibility for the climate crisis. Carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. In terms of cumulative emissions — the quantity of excess greenhouse gases in the atmosphere — the US is responsible for 25 percent, although it contains just 4 percent of the world’s population. China meanwhile is responsible for 13 percent of cumulative emissions, in spite of having 18 percent of the world’s population.[7]

In his bestselling book When China Rules the World, Martin Jacques writes that, as a result of China having “torn from the eighteenth century to the twenty-first century in little more than three decades”, it has worked up “a huge ecological deficit of two centuries accumulated in just a few decades”.[8]

Nevertheless, the Chinese people and government have been increasingly focused on ecological issues in recent decades, and environmental protection has become integrated into all levels of policy-making and economic planning.

Part of the reason for this heightened awareness of ecological issues is that China is already experiencing adverse impacts of climate change. According to the World Food Programme, China is one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world, with up to 200 million people exposed to the effects of droughts and floods.[9] Already tens of thousands have to be evacuated every summer in response to flooding in the Pearl River Delta.[10] High levels of air pollution in the major cities are a serious health issue for the population. China is already experiencing more frequent and intense heat waves due to global warming; Zheng Zhihai, chief forecaster at China’s National Climate Center, observes: “With the intensification of global warming, high-temperature weather in China in recent years has been characterised by its earlier onset, increased frequency, prolonged duration, a wider impact range and increased overall intensity”.[11]

Environmental law expert Barbara Finamore notes that the Communist Party of China (CPC) leadership has accelerated efforts to “transform its economic structure from one reliant on fossil fuel-driven heavy industry and manufacturing to one based on services, innovation, clean energy, and environmental sustainability”.[12] Chinese policy-makers have started to de-emphasise GDP growth and to encourage green development, whereby “living standards continue to rise, but in a way that is much less energy and carbon intensive”.[13] The goal is to construct “an energy and resource efficient, environmentally friendly structure of industries, pattern of growth, and mode of consumption”.[14] In her popular 2013 book The Entrepreneurial State, economist Mariana Mazzucato notes approvingly that China more than any other country is prioritising clean technologies “as part of a strategic vision and long-term commitment to economic growth”.[15]

Early on in his presidency, in July 2013, Xi Jinping outlined his vision in relation to China’s environmental strategy:

“China will respect and protect nature, and accommodate itself to nature’s needs. It will remain committed to the basic state policy of conserving resources and protecting the environment. It will promote green, circular and low-carbon development, and promote ecological progress in every aspect of its effort to achieve economic, political, cultural and social progress. China will also develop a resource-efficient and environmentally friendly geographical layout, industrial structure, mode of production and way of life, and leave to our future generations a working and living environment of blue skies, green fields and clean water.”[16]

Over the course of the last decade, China has become, in the words of former UN under-secretary-general Erik Solheim, the “indispensable country for everything green”,[17] and its “contribution to combatting global climate change is unparalleled”, according to Heymi Bahar, a senior analyst at the International Energy Agency (IEA).[18]

Renewable energy
The most important component of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to replace fossil fuels with low-carbon energy sources. This means shifting power generation from coal, oil and gas to solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and nuclear, and electrifying travel, industry and heating.

Towards this end, China has announced ambitious long-term targets: to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030, and to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060.[19] Announcing these goals at the UN General Assembly in 2020, Xi Jinping explained that “humankind can no longer afford to ignore the repeated warnings of nature and go down the beaten path of extracting resources without investing in conservation, pursuing development at the expense of protection, and exploiting resources without restoration”.[20]

Immediately after the goals were announced, the State Council – China’s top administrative body – introduced a comprehensive ‘1+N’ policy strategy, “comprised of an overarching guideline for reaching the ‘dual carbon’ goals (the ‘1’) and a number of more concrete guidelines and regulations to implement the strategy (the ’N’)”.[21]

The popular online magazine Interesting Engineering notes that “when the Asian superpower set its energy targets in 2020, aiming to achieve peak emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, most dubbed it ambitious. To support these ‘ambitious’ goals, the government committed to constructing 1,200 GW of renewable capacity by 2030… However, China is now on track to achieve this target a remarkable five years ahead of schedule”.[22]

China’s carbon emissions result from the power and heat sectors (51 percent), industry (28 percent), transport (10 percent) and construction (4 percent).[23] The country has been making remarkable progress in reducing the proportion of fossil fuels in each of these sectors. The government has been working at all levels to “quietly reorganise the entire power sector to support rapid electrification and expansion of renewables”.[24] Through coordinated planning and an unprecedented level of investment, China is on track to peak carbon dioxide emissions well ahead of schedule; indeed current trends indicate that this goal may already have been reached.

According to a detailed analysis by Carbon Brief, China’s emissions could well have peaked in 2023, driven by expanding solar and wind generation, along with declining construction activity.[25] Presenting this analysis, The Economist comments: “It is early days, but if this trend continues, the country’s emissions may never again rise to the levels they did in 2023. In other words, they would have peaked”.[26]

Renewable energy capacity reached around 50 percent of total generation capacity in 2023, surpassing that of coal for the first time. The Financial Times editorial board reluctantly admits that “China’s state-owned enterprises, often seen as lumbering giants, are helping to accelerate the adoption of clean tech. Such SOEs, which contribute the lion’s share of China’s gross domestic product, have the resources and backing to develop at scale some of the biggest solar and wind plants, even in remote areas”.[27]

China’s investment in clean energy rose 40 percent year-on-year in 2023, to 890 billion USD. Lauri Myllyvirta, co-founder and lead analyst of the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, observes that this investment is “almost as large as total global investments in fossil fuel supply in 2023”.[28] Interestingly, Myllyvirta’s analysis indicates that renewable energy was the largest driver of China’s economic growth for the year, accounting for 40 percent of GDP increase.

China has taken a significant lead in the area of solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation. This technology is based on converting sunlight directly into electricity. British environmentalist and new energy expert Chris Goodall provides a helpful overview of the physics of solar PV:

We can think of photons of light from the sun as nothing more than pulses of energy. Solar panels work by capturing this energy. Each pulse can dislodge an electron in the panel and give it the extra energy to cross a one-way junction between two thin layers of silicon (or other constituents). This creates a negative charge, adding to the electrical gradient between the two layers of silicon. If wires are attached to the back and front of the panel, the electron will flow back to the layer from which it originally came, creating useful electrical current.[29]

A Bloomberg article from January 2024 reports that China installed more solar panels in 2023 than any other nation has built in total, adding 216.9 gigawatts of capacity. “That’s more than the entire fleet of 175.2 gigawatts in the US”.[30] In the same period, the US added 32 gigawatts – almost seven times less.

Chinese manufacturers dominate the solar panel industry, accounting for over 70 percent of global production. This is a direct result of the government setting clear objectives and policy guidelines which are then implemented at provincial and municipal levels.[31]

In a recent essay titled America Is Losing the Green Tech Race to China, David Wallace-Wells, prominent journalist and author of The Uninhabitable Earth, describes China’s role in the global green-tech supply chain: “China produces 84 percent of the world’s solar modules… It produces 89 percent of the world’s solar cells and 97 percent of its solar wafers and ingots, 86 percent each of its polysilicon and battery cells, 87 percent of its battery cathodes, 96 percent of its battery anodes, 91 percent of its battery electrodes and 85 percent of its battery separators. The list goes on.”[32]

Chinese companies are at the forefront of innovation in the field of renewable energy. In 2023, the world’s largest hydro-solar power plant commenced operations in the Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Garze, Sichuan. This is primarily a solar power plant but it relies on hydropower to regulate the inherent intermittency of solar energy. The plant “will cover the needs of 700,000 households for a whole year with its annual generating capacity of 2 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh)”.[33]

Meanwhile at the world’s largest solar photovoltaic power plant, in China’s western Qinghai province, researchers have found a way to combine green energy generation with tackling desertification and reducing poverty. Nearly 3,000 meters above sea level, and exposed to extreme levels of solar radiation, it is an area that has experienced significant desertification in recent decades: “By the end of the last century, the desertification rate of the land was as high as 98.5 percent, making the solar panels installed here vulnerable to damage from the sand and gravel stirred up by strong gusts of wind”.[34]

Since the installation of the power plant, grass has been thriving, due to photovoltaic panels reducing wind erosion on the vegetation. Furthermore, in order to maintain the grass and to prevent the proliferation of weeds, sheep have been introduced to the solar park. This has given a major boost to livestock cultivation in the region, with people in the surrounding villages now raising “photovoltaic sheep”. The plant is thus “simultaneously generating electricity while making exemplary contributions to poverty alleviation and ecological conservation efforts”.

In addition to its rapidly expanding solar power capacity, China has also been investing heavily in wind energy, and was responsible for 65 percent of total wind power installation in 2023.[35]

In June 2024, it was announced that Dongfang Electric Corporation, a state-owned manufacturer of power generators, had completed the installation (in Guangdong province) of the world’s first 18-megawatt wind turbine, capable of generating power for 36,000 households per year.[36] Indeed, of the top five global wind turbine manufacturers, four are Chinese.[37] China’s investments in wind power have led to major technological advancements and economies of scale, such that installed wind turbine cost in China is just one-fifth of the equivalent cost in the United States.[38]

Alongside the enormous rollout of renewable energy, China has also been working to reduce its reliance on coal, the carbon dioxide emissions of which are twice as high as for natural gas. The use of coal is currently responsible for around 69 percent of China’s carbon emissions,[39] a reflection of China’s resource endowment: plenty of coal, little oil and little gas.[40]

In the 15-year period from 2007 to 2022, coal’s share of the power mix was reduced from 81 percent to 56 percent,[41] with “the large-scale deployment of wind and solar generation starting to satisfy an increasing share of electricity load growth”.[42] It’s true that China continues to build new coal-fired power plants; however, these are modern, cleaner and more efficient replacements for existing plants. US-based analysts KJ Noh and Michael Wong note that the bulk of China’s coal plants are now advanced supercritical or ultra-supercritical plants, “which means they are much more efficient and cleaner than many of the industrial-era legacy plants of the US”.[43]

Many of the coal plants planned or under construction will act in a reserve capacity to ensure reliability of supply from solar and wind power plants. Indeed plans are underway to convert existing coal-fired plants from baseload generators to reliability reserve generators.[44] That is, coal plants would become “providers of energy security and capacity to meet peaks in electricity demand, and not generate large amounts of electricity”.[45] These coal plants can expect to lie idle the bulk of the time. A 2023 Telegraph article notes that the approval of new coal plants “does not mean what many in the West think it means. China is adding one GW of coal power on average as backup for every six GW of new renewable power. The two go hand in hand”.[46]

Transport
Globally, transport is responsible for around one-fifth of carbon dioxide emissions, and is also a significant contributor to air pollution.

As is widely known, China has quickly become the world leader in the electrification of transport. A BBC article describes how, as a result of two decades of government support, China now has over 95 percent of the world’s electric buses, and as of 2022, 77 percent of all buses in the country are electric, up from 16 percent in 2016.[47] A number of major Chinese cities, including Shenzhen, Tianjin and Guangzhou have already achieved 100 percent bus fleet electrification.

In high-speed rail (HSR), China is far out in front, with more high-speed rail miles than the rest of the world combined. Although it only started its HSR rollout in 2008, China now has over 40,000 km. Spain, in second place, has 3,661 km. The US has 735 and Britain has 113.[48] The length of China’s HSR network is expected to reach 70,000 km by 2035.[49]

Chinese electric cars make up 60 percent of worldwide sales, up from 0.1 percent in 2012.[50] An analysis by Carbon Brief reveals that China’s production of electric vehicles grew 36 percent year-on-year in 2023.[51] Regulations are being introduced that will effectively phase out fossil fuel-based cars in the next few years.[52] Almost 50 percent of new car registrations in China are for electric vehicles (EVs), and this number is rising rapidly. For comparison, EV market penetration in the US stands at just 8 percent as of 2024. To go with these electric cars, there is also a growing network of 2.7 million electric vehicle charging stations.[53]

Global cost reduction
China is investing in renewable energy at such a scale as to bring costs down globally. A BBC News report notes that “wind and solar power are booming in China and may help limit global carbon emissions far faster than expected” and that “solar panel installations alone are growing at a pace that would increase global capacity by 85 percent by 2025”.[54] According to a Carbon Brief analysis, solar prices fell by 42 percent in 2023, and battery prices by 50 percent. “This, in turn, has encouraged much faster take-up of clean-energy technologies”.[55] Over the course of the last decade, global solar PV costs have gone down by more than 80 percent, and wind generation by 60 percent, “in large part due to China’s innovation, engineering and manufacturing”.[56]

The drop in renewable prices provides an important boost for the global green transition – “ever-cheaper solar power is a tailwind for the global energy transition”.[57] Kevin Tu, of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, remarks: “If the Chinese manufacturers had not brought down the cost of panels by more than 95 percent, we could not see so many installations across the world”.[58]

China is thus making a massive contribution to making the global green transition viable. Even the Financial Times editorial board accepts that, “when it comes to climate change, Beijing’s green advances should be seen as positive for China, and for the world”.[59] Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, assesses that “China’s provision of services and support to other countries has significantly improved the accessibility of clean energy technologies and reduced the global cost of using green technologies”.[60]

Unfortunately not everyone sees things that way. The US government announced in May 2024 a new raft of tariffs against Chinese green technology, including a 100 percent tariff on electric vehicles (EVs), a 50 percent tariff on solar cells, and a 25 percent tariff on lithium-ion batteries. Presented as a means of curbing China’s unfair trading practices and boosting the US’s domestic manufacturing, the tariffs self-evidently form part of the broader New Cold War and are an example of President Biden appearing to get “tough on China” in advance of November’s presidential elections. Such “toughness” is a bipartisan consensus in the US: Donald Trump responded to Biden’s 100 percent tariffs by promising tariffs of 200 percent if he is elected.[61]

A Forbes article notes: “Most analysts tend to concur that in the medium- and long-term, a trade war with China isn’t in America’s best interests… With the US many years behind China both in terms of EV development and renewable energy manufacturing, experts said they found it unlikely that simply buying more time would help spur the nation’s — and the world’s – all-important drive away from fossil fuels, which the scientific community has repeatedly said is essential if humanity is to avoid catastrophic warming.”[62]

This highlights the stupidity and short-sightedness of the US’s escalating “climate trade war” with China. In the name of suppressing China’s economic and technological rise, the US political leadership (both Democrat and Republican) is sabotaging the US’s own green transition. As Marxist economist Michael Roberts points out:

China has scaled up its green industries rapidly. It now produces nearly 80 precent of the world’s solar PV modules, 60 percent of wind turbines and 60 percent of electric vehicles and batteries. In 2023 alone, its solar-power capacity grew by more than the total installed capacity in the US… The cost [of Biden’s tariffs] to the US economy and the profitability of US industry will be considerable, and even more to the real incomes of Americans.[63]

The FT describes the US’s climate trade war as “a blow to the green transition at home and potentially abroad” since, “with households already pressed by the high cost of living, lower prices for EVs and solar panels now look like a missed opportunity”.[64] A further FT article notes that both Europe and the US “will face a mammoth task in creating a new clean tech supply chain that excludes China”.[65] Prices for green energy products and materials will increase, and “it might be very difficult to really scale things up fast, because of the fact that you can’t tap into that Chinese expertise”.[66]

US politicians have been talking incessantly about China’s “overcapacity” in solar PV and electric vehicle production,[67] but it is perfectly obvious that no such overcapacity exists in the green industry. As Erik Solheim remarks: “We have all called for many more high-quality green products from everyone, from China, from Europe, from the US, from everyone. Why start blaming China for doing what is expected from everyone?”[68]

One glaring irony of the situation is that US and EU tariffs will have minimal impact on China’s exports, as it can find growing markets elsewhere in the world. The real losers will be ordinary people in North America and Europe.

All countries, and developed countries in particular, face a critical challenge of decarbonising their economies, and it will be impossible to meet that challenge without intense global cooperation. As a white paper from China’s State Council Information Office, China’s Green Development in the New Era, puts it: “Protecting the environment and countering climate change are the common responsibilities of all countries. Only when all countries unite and work together to promote green and sustainable development can we maintain the overall balance in the earth’s ecology and protect humanity’s one and only home.”[69]

Going nuclear
Nuclear energy is not generally considered as being renewable, since it relies on precursors such as uranium, the supply of which is finite. Nonetheless, uranium is a very common element and there is enough of it available to meet demand for centuries into the future, given that “1 kg of uranium contains the same amount of energy as 2.7 million kg of coal.”[70] Furthermore nuclear energy is far cleaner than fossil fuels: its does not emit greenhouse gases nor cause air pollution, although as a 2021 article for Deutsche Welle points out, the extraction, transportation and processing of uranium does produce emissions.[71]

Nuclear energy is however highly controversial, and public perception of it is coloured by the notorious nuclear accidents in Three Mile Island (1979), Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011).[72] Many environmentalists reject the idea of nuclear having a long-term role to play in meeting humanity’s energy needs, due to the risk of accidents and of radioactive waste leaking and contaminating water and soil; uranium-235 after all has a half-life of over 700 million years. Meanwhile, much of the peace movement rejects nuclear energy due to the potential for nuclear weapons proliferation: “nuclear power and nuclear weapons industries share a common technological basis and are mutually beneficial”.[73] There are also legitimate concerns that enriched uranium or plutonium could fall into the hands of terrorist groups.

Controversy notwithstanding, nuclear power currently makes a significant contribution to the energy mix in many countries, and in the words of British environmentalist Mike Berners-Lee, “anyone taking a firm anti-nuclear stance needs to have a coherent plan for the low carbon future without it”.[74] Nuclear power is the main source of electricity in France (in no small measure a manifestation of its neocolonial relationship with Niger, which has provided much of the uranium); “as a result, France has about half the carbon emissions per head of the OECD as a whole”.[75] According to the International Energy Agency, global nuclear power capacity will have to double by 2050 if humanity is to reach the net zero goals agreed by the UN.[76]

Hannah Ritchie opines that “one of the biggest misconceptions is that nuclear power is unsafe. In fact, it’s one of the safest sources of energy.” She goes on to note that that the death toll from the Chernobyl disaster – incorporating direct deaths and potential deaths from cancer cases caused by the radiation – is under 400. “Every one of those deaths is tragic, but they’re much fewer than most imagine, especially given the fact that this was the worst nuclear disaster in history and is unlikely to be repeated.” As such, she considers that nuclear energy is “hundreds, if not thousands, of times safer” than fossil fuels.[77] David Wallace-Wells makes a similar point in his popular 2019 book, The Uninhabitable Earth: “Already, more than 10,000 people die from air pollution daily. That is considerably more each day than the total number of people who have ever been affected by the meltdowns of nuclear reactors.”[78]

Nuclear energy is a costly option in most parts of the world, not least because many countries have divested from it in recent decades. China however has continued to consider nuclear an important part of its strategy for both energy security and reducing emissions. As such, China has “plans to generate an eye-popping amount of nuclear energy, quickly and at relatively low cost”, with a view to building over 150 new reactors in the next 15 years, “more than the rest of the world has built in the past 35”.[79] Nuclear could play a particularly important role in replacing coal-fired plants. The Financial Times observes that “policymakers in Beijing believe nuclear power can help replace coal-fired plants, which are still the main source of China’s electricity despite a rapid growth in renewables”.[80]

China is leading research into nuclear power, including fourth-generation reactors, the first of which was connected to the grid in December 2021.[81] Fourth-generation reactors promise to be significantly safer and to produce far less radioactive waste than earlier nuclear technology.[82] A recent report by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation found that the US is 10 to 15 years behind China in rolling out next-generation reactors, the result of China’s “coherent national strategy to develop nuclear power”.[83] Between 2008 to 2023, China’s share of nuclear energy-related patents increased from 1.3 percent to 13.4 percent.[84]

China is at the forefront of research into thorium-based nuclear power generation,[85] which is widely considered to be both cleaner and safer than its uranium-based counterpart: thorium is three times as abundant as uranium, produces far less nuclear waste, and is much more difficult to convert into nuclear weapons. According to Kailash Agarwal of the International Atomic Energy Agency, “because of its abundance and its fissile material breeding capability, thorium could potentially offer a long-term solution to humanity’s energy needs”.[86]

China is also among the world leaders in the effort to generate energy through nuclear fusion,[87] which has the potential to some day generate unlimited, safe, emissions-free and radioactive waste-free power: “Nuclear fusion could eventually provide a virtually unlimited source of power that is carbon free and which does not pose the same safety and security issues as nuclear fission”.[88]

Green Belt and Road
The fruits of Chinese investment in green energy are being reaped beyond the borders of the People’s Republic, with Chinese companies supplying renewable energy infrastructure around the world, particularly the countries of the Global South. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in particular “provides an opportunity to export green technology across Central Asia and Africa”.[89]

Addressing the UN General Assembly in September 2021, Xi Jinping announced that China will not build any new coal-fired power plants overseas, and would increase its support for developing countries to pursue green and low-carbon development.[90] Since then, China’s investment in renewable energy projects along the Belt and Road has increased substantially. According to an analysis by Energy Monitor, in the first half of 2023, 41 percent of BRI energy engagement went to solar and wind power, compared with 25 percent in the first half of 2020.[91] In 2013, renewable energy only constituted 19 percent of energy financing under the BRI.[92]

Chinese financing for renewable power generation now accounts for the large majority of Chinese-financed overseas power generation capacity. Ma Xinyue of Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center opines that “by combining rapid phase-out of coal finance across the world and facilitating the world’s energy and economic transition, China has the opportunity to assume international climate leadership during an absolutely critical time”.[93]

Environmentally-friendly projects developed within the framework of the BRI include a 123MW solar plant in South Africa that will provide electricity to over 80,000 households;[94] Noor Abu Dhabi – the world’s largest single-site solar power plant;[95] the ‘Whoosh’ high-speed railway – Indonesia’s first high-speed railway, connecting Jakarta to Bandung;[96] the Tabarjal 400MW solar power plant in Saudi Arabia;[97] the enormous Quaid-e-Azam Solar Power Park in Pakistan;[98] Latin America’s largest solar plant, Cauchari Solar Park in Argentina;[99] Zambia’s largest hydropower plant, the Kafue Gorge Lower Hydropower Station;[100] a 1,000 MW floating solar plant in Zimbabwe;[101] a 50 MW wind power plant in Namibia;[102] and many more.

Interviewed by Global Times in June 2024, Erik Solheim discusses his experiences living in Kenya for several years and witnessing the construction by Chinese companies of the Mombasa-Nairobi railroad. “It is the cleanest and most well-functioning transport system in Kenya. It’s an absolute, wonderful, green contribution to Africa”.[103]

Nigerian journalist Otiato Opali writes that “from the Sakai photovoltaic power station in the Central African Republic and the Garissa solar plant in Kenya, to the Aysha wind power project in Ethiopia and the Kafue Gorge hydroelectric station in Zambia, China has implemented hundreds of clean energy, green development projects in Africa, supporting the continent’s efforts to tackle climate change”.[104] Tony Tiyou, CEO of clean energy company Renewables in Africa, adds: “China is clearly showing some leadership here, and they should be commended for that”.[105]

China is also supporting Cuba’s bid to generate 24 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030, and Cuba has joined the China-initiated Belt and Road Energy Partnership.[106]

Ecological civilisation and the role of socialism
In the US, Britain and elsewhere, governments make empty promises around renewable energy and carbon efficiency, whilst taking precious little meaningful action. Indeed they maintain fossil fuel subsidies, expand drilling for oil and gas, impose tariffs and sanctions on Chinese solar panels and EVs, and engage in ecologically ruinous military activities. Meanwhile, the capitalist class attempts to shift responsibility away from itself and on to individual consumers, who are expected to reduce their domestic energy consumption, to avoid flying, to recycle, to take shorter showers, to drive electric cars, to eat less meat and so on. The crisis is thereby, in typical neoliberal fashion, individualised, and the capitalist class is absolved of all responsibility and blame.

The balance of power in capitalist countries is such that even relatively progressive governments (where these exist) find it difficult to prioritise long-term needs of the population over short-term interests of capital.

Economic anthropologist Jason Hickel writes: “The past half-century is littered with milestones of inaction. A scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change first began to form in the mid-1970s… The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was adopted in 1992 to set non-binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions. International climate summits – the UN Congress of Parties – have been held annually since 1995 to negotiate plans for emissions reductions. The UN framework has been extended three times, with the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, the Copenhagen Accord in 2009, and the Paris Agreement in 2015. And yet global CO2 emissions continue to rise year after year, while ecosystems unravel at a deadly pace.”[107]

China is still a developing country, but it has become the clear global leader in environmental protection. It is the world’s first renewable energy superpower. The government is not shifting responsibility to individuals, but promoting coordinated action at all levels of government and society.

It is important to understand why it is China, rather than any other major country, that is leading the way in the struggle to prevent climate breakdown; why it is China systematically pursuing an environmental action plan that goes beyond the wildest dreams of Western environmentalists; why it is China that is “building a society in which everyone pursues ecological progress all the time, everywhere, and in everything they do.”[108]

As John Bellamy Foster observes: “While China has made moves to implement its radical conception of ecological civilisation, which is built into state planning and regulation, the notion of a Green New Deal has taken concrete form nowhere in the West. It is merely a slogan at this point without any real political backing within the system. It was talked about by progressive forces and then rejected by the powers that be.”[109]

Mike Berners-Lee has written that, “more than in most countries, if a policy idea is seen as a good thing, the Chinese can bring it about”.[110] This could be interpreted as a trope about China’s putative authoritarianism, but it reflects a profoundly important reality: China’s crucial advantage is its political system. As Xi Jinping puts it, China has “the political advantage of pooling resources to solve major problems”,[111] and this in turn is a manifestation of the location of political power in the working people led by the CPC. The government’s goals are the masses’ goals, and hence the pursuit of a Beautiful China and the fight against climate breakdown can be prioritised, just as the fights against poverty and Covid-19 have been.

China has raced ahead in renewable energy, energy efficiency, electric vehicles, afforestation and ‘circular’ waste management because it has identified those sectors as being absolutely crucial for the future of not only China but the world. As such, it has built environmental considerations into the core of its planning system and has targeted public investment accordingly.

What’s more, China’s enormous investments have largely been made by state banks, and many of its key projects carried out by state-owned enterprises, according to strategic guidelines laid out by the government. This is possible because of the basic structure and planned nature of the Chinese economy. Which is to say, the fundamental reason China has emerged as the undisputed leader in the fight against climate breakdown is its socialist system. However, the results of China’s progress are already having a global impact, as described above. The whole world, and particularly developing countries, can benefit from China’s innovations in renewable energy and electric transport. And for those of us in the advanced capitalist countries, where political power is dominated by a decaying and aggressive bourgeoisie, China’s example can be used to help create mass pressure to stop our governments and ruling classes from destroying the planet, and to encourage sensible cooperation with China on environmental issues.

(Notes at link.)

https://socialistchina.org/2024/09/06/c ... evolution/

Image

China to give LDCs including 33 African countries zero-tariff treatment

[quote[President Xi Jinping announced at the opening ceremony of the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) summit in Beijing on Wednesday that China would unilaterally give all least developing countries (LDCs) zero-tariff market access for all products, making China the first major economy to take such a step. This move is part of a wide-ranging action plan agreed at the forum, which includes over 50 billion dollars of investment by China in African development initiatives over the next three years.

The FOCAC summit has been taking place amidst a backdrop of increasingly hysterical propaganda about the China-Africa relationship in the Western media, particularly in relation to China’s infrastructure investment. China is painted as engaging in exploitative, neocolonial practices, but this does not chime with reality. Indeed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said on the sidelines of the FOCAC summit that he did not believe Chinese investments in Africa were pushing the continent into a ‘debt trap’ but were, rather, part of a mutually beneficial relationship.

A few facts that Washington’s stenographers routinely ignore:

China has been Africa’s largest trading partner for 15 years in a row
China provides finance for desperately-needed infrastructure projects, with interest rates typically half those of Western lenders, and with longer repayment periods
China’s investment is focused on meeting Africa’s needs, particularly around energy, transport, telecommunications and green development
With Chinese support, Ethiopia in 2015 celebrated the opening of the first metro train system in sub-Saharan Africa
The African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa was funded by the Chinese government as a gift to the AU
The Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) was built with Chinese support
While there are endless scare stories about Chinese companies only employing Chinese workers, research shows that over 75 percent of employees in Chinese companies in Africa are local
A key reason for the popularity of Chinese financing is that it comes without strings attached, unlike organisations like the IMF, with its demands for austerity, privatisation and deregulation
52 of the 54 African countries have signed up to the Belt and Road Initiative
China does not interfere in the internal affairs of African countries, and regards respect for other countries’ sovereignty as an inviolable principle
China-Africa energy cooperation offers the opportunity for Africa to leapfrog the fossil fuel age and move straight to renewable energy
Tens of thousands of African students attend universities in China, which offers more university scholarships to African students than the leading western governments combined
China’s approach is markedly different to that of the West. At the 2018 FOCAC summit, Xi Jinping outlined China’s “Five No” approach to its relations with Africa: 1) No interference into African countries’ pursuit of development paths that fit their national conditions. 2) No interference in African countries’ internal affairs. 3) No imposition of China’s will on African countries. 4) No attachment of political strings to assistance to Africa. 5) No seeking of selfish political gains in investment and financing cooperation with Africa.
China is helping Africa to break out of an underdevelopment that was forced on it by Western colonialism and imperialism. As Liberia’s former Minister of Public Works W Gyude Moore said, “China has built more infrastructure in Africa in two decades than the West has in centuries”.
So when the West accuses of China of neo-colonialism in Africa, it is really just engaging in projection and slander.

The following article is republished from Global Times.[/quote]

China has decided to give all least developed countries having diplomatic relations with China, including 33 countries in Africa, zero-tariff treatment for 100 percent tariff lines, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced on Thursday in a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2024 Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) in Beijing, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

This has made China the first major developing country and the first major economy to take such a step. It will help turn China’s big market into Africa’s big opportunity, Xi said, Xinhua reported.

China will expand market access for African agricultural products, deepen cooperation with Africa in e-commerce and other areas, and launch a “China-Africa quality enhancement program,” Xi said.

Chinese experts said that this new trade measure will not only greatly facilitate trade between Africa and the world’s second-largest economy but also inject new impetus into Africa’s development through enhanced trade and investment.

“Our offering of zero-tariff treatment to the least developed countries in Africa … is actually a crucial component of support for trade… The core development concept is to unlock Africa’s autonomous development capabilities through enhanced trade, rather than merely increasing the volume and quality of China-Africa trade,” Song Wei, a professor at the School of International Relations and Diplomacy at Beijing Foreign Studies University, told the Global Times on Thursday.

In recent years, under the strategic guidance of heads of state from China and Africa, economic and trade cooperation has shown promising results.

In 2023, China-Africa trade reached $282.1 billion, marking a historic high for the second consecutive year, said Lin Honghong, director of the Department of International Relations of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, at a press briefing for the FOCAC, on Tuesday.

Additionally, over the past three years, Chinese companies have provided more than 1.1 million jobs in Africa. “These figures fully demonstrate that China-Africa economic and trade cooperation continues to maintain strong momentum,” said Lin.

The zero-tariff policy will lead to more African agricultural products and mineral resources, which are strengths of Africa, entering China, Song said.

At the same time, leveraging e-commerce, the new trade policy will promote the entry of more advantageous Chinese products into Africa, meeting the development needs of Africa, and improving the quality of life of the African people, the Chinese expert said.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/09/06/c ... treatment/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Thu Sep 12, 2024 2:21 pm

US War on China is a War on the Entire World
September 12, 2024

Image
Chinese and US flags and currency notes. File photo.

By Brian Berletic – Sep 7, 2024

US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan has recently claimed the US is not “looking for a crisis.” This is said, of course, with an important caveat—no crisis is sought as long as China subordinates itself to the United States.

Because China, like any other sovereign nation, based on international law, is obligated to resist foreign subordination, the US continues speeding toward inevitable war with China. Although China has formidable military capabilities, causing doubt among many that the US will actually ever trigger war with China, the US has spent decades attempting to create and exploit a potential weakness China’s current military might may be incapable of defending against.

Washington’s long-running policy of containing China
Far from a recent policy shift by the Biden Administration, US ambitions to encircle and contain China stretch back to the end of World War II. Even as far back as 1965 as the US waged war against Vietnam, US documents referred to a policy “to contain Communist China,” as “long-running,” and identified the fighting in Southeast Asia as necessary toward achieving this policy.

For decades the US has waged wars of aggression along China’s periphery, engaged in political interference to destabilize China’s partners as well as attempt to destabilize China itself, as well as pursued likewise long-running policies to undermine China’s economic growth and its trade with the rest of the world.

More recently, the US has begun reorganizing its entire military for inevitable war with China.

Cutting Chinese economic lines of communication
In addition to fighting Chinese forces in the Asia-Pacific region, the US also has long-running plans to cut off Chinese trade around the globe.

In 2006, the US Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) published String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power Across the Asia Littoral, identifying China’s essential “sea lines of communication” (SLOC) from the Middle East to the Strait of Malacca as particularly vulnerable and subject to US primacy over Asia.

The paper argues that US primacy, and in particular, its military presence across the region, could be used as leverage for “drawing China into the community of nations as a responsible stakeholder,” a euphemism for subordinating China to US primacy. This, in turn, is in line with a wider global policy seeking to “deter any nation or group of nations from challenging American primacy.”

Under a section titled, Leveraging US Military Power, the paper argues for and expanded US military presence across the entire region, including along China’s SLOC, augmenting its existing presence in East Asia (South Korea and Japan), but also extending it to Southeast Asia and South Asia, recruiting nations like Indonesia and Bangladesh to bolster US military power over the region and thus over China.

It notes Chinese efforts to secure its SLOC, including with a mutually beneficial port project in Pakistan’s Baluchistan region, part of the larger China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and the construction of a port in Sittwe, Myanmar, part of the larger China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC). Both projects seek to create alternative economic lines of communication for China, circumventing the long and vulnerable sea route through the Malacca Strait and the South China Sea.

Both projects have since come under attack by US-backed militancy with regular attacks still taking place against Chinese engineers across Pakistan and a large-scale armed conflict backed by the US currently unfolding in Myanmar which regularly sees opposition forces target Chinese-built infrastructure.

Thus, US policy has sought and has since achieved the region-wide disruption of China’s SLOC as well as efforts to circumvent choke points (CPEC/CMEC). Other potential corridors, including through the heart of Southeast Asia, have also been targeted by US interference. The Thai section of China’s high-speed railway to connect Southeast Asia to China has been significantly delayed by the US-backed political opposition openly trying to cancel the project.

In many ways, the US has already created a crisis for China, albeit through proxies.



Targeting Chinese maritime shipping
Under the guise of protecting “freedom of navigation,” the US Navy has positioned its warships and military aviation around the world’s most important maritime passages including the Strait of Hormuz in the Middle East and the South China Sea—the east approach to the Strait of Malacca—along with plans to establish a significant naval presence on the Strait’s west approach.

The US realizes that Chinese military power is extensive enough to significantly complicate, if not outright defeat, US military aggression along Chinese coasts. The US instead imagines targeting China far beyond the reach of its warplanes and missile forces.

The US Naval Institute published, Prize Law Can Help the United States Win the War of 2026, the third place entry in the Future of Naval Warfare Essay Contest. It warns that a “close naval blockage” is infeasible due to China’s formidable anti-access area-denial (A2AD) capabilities.

It instead argues for:

…a distant blockade—“intercept[ing] Chinese merchant shipping at key maritime chokepoints” outside China’s A2/AD reach—would be generally sustainable; flexible in tempo and location; pose manageable risks of escalation; and impede China’s resource-hungry, import-dependent war effort.

Part of this “distant blockade” would be a campaign of targeting, seizing, and repurposing Chinese shipping vessels to augment the US’ lagging shipbuilding capabilities and the dearth of maritime resources it has created.

Far from a random essay representing a purely speculative strategy, the US has already taken steps to implement its “distant blockade.” The entire US Marine Corps has been tailored solely to wage war against Chinese shipping across the Asia-Pacific and beyond.

The BBC in its 2023 article, “How US Marines are being reshaped for China threat,” would report: “The new plan sees the Marines as fighting dispersed operations across chains of islands. Units will be smaller, more spread out, but packing a much bigger punch through a variety of new weapons systems.”

The “new weapons systems” are primarily anti-shipping missiles. Operating on islands and in littoral regions, the US Marines have been transformed into a force almost solely for disrupting Chinese shipping.

Together with plans to seize Chinese vessels, the US has positioned itself not as a global protector of “freedom of navigation,” but the greatest threat to it. Considering China’s status as the largest trade partner of nations around the globe, US plans to target Chinese shipping isn’t a threat to only China, but to global economic prosperity as a whole.

US war with China is war with the world
The danger of Washington’s desire for war with China and implementing its “distant blockade” to strangle China’s economy into ruins is a danger for the entire world. While preventing the global economic damage this strategy will cause after it is put into motion may be impossible, targeting the various components the US is using to encircle and contain China ahead of this conflict is possible.

US political interference and the political as well as armed opposition it has created and is using to cut China’s various economic lines of communication, can be exposed and uprooted by national and regional security initiatives.

Securing national and regional information space is the simplest and most effective way to cut the US off from the populations it seeks to influence and turn against targeted nations to achieve the political and security crises it uses to threaten trade between China and its partners. Passing and enforcing laws targeting, exposing, and uprooting US interference, including the funding of opposition parties, organizations, and media platforms by the US government’s National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is also essential.

Recent moves by the US to target foreign media organizations and their alleged cooperation with American citizens has created a convenient pretext for other nations to cite when targeting and uprooting NED-funded activity.

While taking these steps will have their own consequences, including retaliation from the US itself, the alternative—allowing the US to prepare and eventually carry out its “distant blockade” against China and its global trade partners—will be even more consequential.

Only time will tell if the emerging multipolar world is capable of seeing and solving this future crisis the US has spent decades preparing to create, or if the political leadership in Southeast and South Asia will fear short-term consequences at the expense of allowing and thus suffering catastrophic consequences in the intermediate future.

https://orinocotribune.com/us-war-on-ch ... ire-world/

******

The yuan makes a strong entrance into the global financial landscape[/bv]
Sep 11, 2024 , 9:09 am .

Image
Some countries have sought to diversify their economic transactions through new strategic alliances, especially with emerging powers such as China (Photo: Archive / El Economista)

According to Bloomberg reports , the yuan surpassed the European Union (EU) currency, the euro, in April 2024, while reaffirming its lead and second position in June. It is the basic unit of the renminbi (RMB), which is the Asian country's legal tender, issued by the People's Bank of China.

The Society for World Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Swift) payment messaging system reported that in April, nearly 6% of global payments were made in RMB. But in June, the figure doubled to 13.37%.

However, a report by the European Central Bank (ECB) attributes the development to "changes in banks' liquidity management practices and in the types of messages used, as some payments are no longer included in the Swift indicator." According to the bank, "this change supports greater interoperability, straight-through processing and more granular classification of financial data."

Various analyses claim that the rise of the currency is part of a broader strategy by the BRICS countries to reduce their dependence on the US dollar and the euro in international trade.

The dollar's dominance in international trade makes the European currency succumb to the geopolitical decisions of the United States. In 2022, it reached its lowest level in 20 years against the dollar in a context of high inflation and growing uncertainty about the continuity of Russian gas supplies. However, in February 2023, it began to recover due to a milder-than-expected winter and reduced gas consumption.

The euro versus dollar relationship is mediated by energy: imports of oil, gas and other raw materials are mostly denominated in dollars, so when the dollar weakens, they become cheaper in euros.

In addition, in 2022 the increase in interest rates by the US Federal Reserve (FED) impacted the attraction of investments to that country to the detriment of its European partners. If the ECB does not do so, this may strengthen the dollar against the euro.

Signs of monetary detoxification: The case of Latin America
The hegemony of the dollar has caused economic dependence and growing discontent with US policy in regions such as West Asia, Africa and Latin America, so some countries have sought to diversify their economic transactions through new strategic alliances, especially with emerging powers such as China.

Image
Dollar hegemony versus de-dollarization (Photo: Global Times)

The strategy has been to facilitate international transactions between local currencies and the RMB without having to use the dollar as is usually the case. This has allowed the Chinese currency to become convertible and more widely used.

Beijing has signaled its intention to increase the presence of its currency in Latin America over the past decade, after becoming a key trading partner in the region and a source of financing for some countries.

Brazil, Chile, Peru, Mexico and Ecuador were the countries that exported the most to the Asian country last year. The exchange of goods with the region exceeded 480 billion dollars, according to calculations made by BBC Mundo , with a surplus of 2 billion dollars in favor of Latin America. In 2000, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) reported a bilateral exchange of 14 billion.

A BBC note , published in May 2023, highlights that in 2015 the Chinese authorities signed investment and currency exchange agreements with Chile and announced the opening of the first "Clearing House", or RMB clearing bank in Latin America.

In Argentina, the outgoing government of Alberto Fernández announced in 2023 that its purchases from China would begin to be paid in RMB, instead of dollars, to preserve its weakened international reserves. The then Minister of Economy, Sergio Massa, signed an agreement in April of that year to stop paying for imports from China in dollars and start paying in RMB, after activating a swap or financial exchange agreement with the Asian country equivalent to 5 billion dollars.

Despite his anti-communist rhetoric, the current Argentine president, Javier Milei, agreed to refinance the activated tranche of the swap with China and pay the commitments in the first half of 2026. This cleared up a possible impact on reserves in the short term.

At the end of 2022, the yuan overtook the euro as Brazil's second-largest foreign reserve currency. The government of Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva announced an agreement to trade with China in the currencies of both countries and avoid using the dollar.

Image
Exports and imports between Brazil and China in 2022 (Photo: Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC))

South America's largest country is China's largest trading partner in Latin America, with bilateral trade reaching a record $181 billion in 2023.

More than 90% of Brazil's foreign trade is still conducted in dollars. The US currency still holds a considerable advantage in the country's reserves - it represents 79.99% of the central bank's total reserves, compared to 80.42% in 2022, the lowest level since 2014 (79.70%).

By the end of 2023, the euro regained its second position in Brazilian reserves, 5.24% of the total compared to 4.74% in 2022, while the yuan, absent from Brazil's foreign reserves until 2018, saw its share decline to 4.80% from 5.37%.

Bolivia has been carrying out transactions in RMB since 2023, and this year Banco Unión, which carries out most of the financial operations in the country's public administration, signed an agreement with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) to carry out direct operations in the Chinese currency, without intermediaries, as an alternative to the lack of dollars. ICBC is the largest bank in China and the largest bank in the world by market capitalization, deposits and profitability.

Trade between China and Venezuela continues to grow after the global pandemic. China's ambassador to Caracas, Lan Hu, stated in 2023 that bilateral trade between January and May 2023 amounted to almost 1.6 billion dollars.

A new order against sanctions and global coercion ?
For the first time in March 2023, China used more RMB than dollars to pay for its international transactions, even though its currency moved less than 5% of world trade.

It is the largest trading partner of more than 120 countries and its strength lies in its ability to purchase raw materials intensively, among other aspects. This market, dominated by oil, is considered by the co-director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, Gal Luft , as "the insurance policy for the status of the dollar as a reserve currency." The Republican has warned that "if that block is removed from the wall, it will begin to collapse."

In addition to Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia and Venezuela, other countries of global energy importance such as Russia and Saudi Arabia have already migrated their transactions to the yuan, with significant effects.

Image
The dollar's weight in global foreign exchange reserves is falling (Photo: En Orsai)

The RMB has overtaken the dollar as Russia’s most traded currency in 2023, accounting for 23% of Russian import payments in 2022. The country’s Finance Ministry announced plans to launch the BRICS Bridge , a platform enabling cross-border payments between member states.

The idea is to use Digital Financial Assets (DFA) issued by the central banks of the BRICS members whose assets would be linked to the national currencies of the member states, which will allow the group to carry out operations almost instantly with minimal costs, regardless of third-party restrictions.

Countries that are adopting the RMB for international payments are benefiting from better trading conditions because the currency is positioning itself as a low-interest rate currency compared to the successive increases experienced by the dollar throughout 2022.

In 2000, more than 70% of all global foreign exchange reserves were held in dollars. The latest data released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) show that this percentage has fallen to 55%, while the RMB is rising.

The geopolitical key lies in the growing notion in the Global South that reducing their dependence on the dollar would allow them to protect themselves from future geopolitical vulnerabilities, such as international sanctions.

Image
China is the largest trading partner for many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia and the Pacific, while the United States is the most important trading partner for countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (Photo: World Bank)

Saudi Arabia, which signed a 1974 agreement with the United States to pay for its oil exports in dollars, decided not to renew it on June 9, ending a 50-year-old commitment. Riyadh can now sell oil and other goods in currencies such as the RMB, euro, yen, yuan and more, instead of just the petrodollar.

Washington imposed its global hegemony along with its military power through control over the financial system, after the dollar became the international reserve currency at the end of World War II, following the Bretton Woods meeting in July 1944, in which 44 countries participated.

In August 1971, then-US President Richard Nixon eliminated the exchange of gold for dollars and turned the currency into a fiat currency, meaning that it is not backed by a physical product, gold or silver, and has no intrinsic value.

Once the dollar became the global currency for energy, central banks began to hold monetary reserves in US Treasury securities, which allowed them to ensure their ability to purchase fossil fuels.

Washington, for its part, thus ensured a stable demand for the dollar and provided a constant source of financing for its deficit, which strengthened its value and stability. In return, these commodity-exporting countries received military and economic support.

The hegemonic circuit is based on the fact that almost all international payments are made through Swift, where the dollar dominates. Meanwhile, the euro remained the second currency in use.

This is how the coercive system from the Global North works. If a US or EU sanction targets international payments made through this platform, the sanctioned country is restricted from trading internationally.

Other international payments in another currency would allow countries to make those same payments and maintain their trade relations unhindered by these sanctions. China already has the China International Payments System (CIPS), a parallel platform to Swift, which further ensures that it can trade without coercion from the United States and its allies.

Positioning the yuan as a new tool in the balance of power on the global geopolitical chessboard could not only benefit China to the extent that its sphere of influence expands, but could also mitigate and reduce its own vulnerability to future international sanctions.

Slow but sure: China's strategy in the face of adverse scenarios
Before 2000, more than 80% of countries traded with the United States more than with China, but by 2018 this was only the case for 30% as China quickly took the top spot in 128 of 190 countries after joining the World Trade Organization. Between 2005 and 2010, several countries shifted toward relations with China, especially in Africa and Asia.

Image
Countries connected to their main trading partner in 2000 (Photo: Xataka)

Image
Countries connected to their main trading partner in 2010 (Photo: Xataka)

Image
Countries connected to their main trading partner in 2020 (Photo: Xataka)

Analysts say that when China did not have the capacity to maintain a currency as a geopolitical weapon, it used it defensively. It was the economy with the most US Treasury bonds until 2022, when Japan became its largest debt holder.

Its reserves were in dollars, but being the largest holder of its debt was a latent threat to the North American country.

Once China gained the capacity, it began to progressively get rid of dollar reserves and strengthen the yuan, a decision that affects the bank balance sheets of those holding US Treasury bonds. The two-track system has worked as a pressure mechanism in the following way:

1. China's holdings of US Treasury bonds reached $805.4 billion in August 2023, down 40% from a decade earlier, according to data from the US Treasury Department. By June, China already held $780.2 billion in Treasury bonds, roughly 10.3% of US national debt.

Image
By 2024, China's holdings of US Treasuries have fallen to $775 billion from around $1.1 trillion in 2021 (Photo: FXStreet)

2. On the other hand, China has chosen to be a key partner of Russia, a country subject to massive sanctions by Europe and the United States, buying its raw materials at low prices and in a global scenario of high prices. This is due to a forecast of adverse geopolitical scenarios in the event of a victory of Donald Trump in the US presidential elections, but it also strengthens the BRICS by supporting the Russian economy.

The new currency that the BRICS would propose as a reliable, fast and economically efficient solution for cross-border payments is called the unit , which aims to eliminate direct dependence on the currency of other nations and achieve the potential to anchor fair trade and investments, that is, coexist with the dollar. Some details of the concept of this currency:

It can be issued in a decentralized manner and then recognized and regulated at a national level.
It is based on partial backing in gold (40%) and Brics+ currencies (60%), including commodities.
Create a new Eurasian Commodity Exchange, where trade and settlement can be conducted in a new currency that bridges trade flows and capital.
It paves the way for the development of new financial products for foreign direct investment.


The dollar remains the dominant currency, appearing as the most used asset in transactions with goods, financial services or as a reserve asset. As in other geopolitical aspects, Europe is tied to what the United States determines, and so is the euro.

The migration of more countries to the group that has switched from the dollar or the euro to the yuan could generate a new diversified trade pattern that would reduce the hegemony and, therefore, also the influence of the United States and its allies over these countries and regions.

This is well known by the financial elites of the Global North, so their responses are multifaceted, and some warnings were already given during the trade war against the Asian country declared by Trump in 2018.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/el ... ro-mundial

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:20 pm

A Walk Along the Baiyangdian Lake in the Xiong’an New Area: The Fortieth Newsletter (2024)

On 1 October 1949, the People’s Republic of China was established. Seventy-five years into its revolutionary process, China has made rapid advances while still facing many challenges.

3 October 2024

Image
Detail of: Ye Wulin (China), 红星颂 (Ode to the Red Star), 2015.

Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

Seventy-five years ago, on 1 October 1949, Mao Zedong (1893–1976) announced the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). It is important to note that the Communist Party of China (CPC) did not name the new state the Socialist Republic, but instead called it the People’s Republic. That is because Mao and the CPC did not foresee China being immediately ushered into socialism; rather, the country was embarking on the road to socialism, a process that would likely take decades, if not a century. That was very clear to the people who began to shape the new state and society. The People’s Republic would have to be built out of the embers of a very long war, one that began when the Japanese invaded northern China in 1931 and that lasted for the next 14 years and took the lives of over 35 million people. ‘From now on our nation will belong to the community of the peace-loving and freedom-loving nations of the world’, Mao said at the first plenary session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on 21 September 1949. The new China, he continued, will ‘work courageously and industriously to foster its own civilisation and well-being and at the same time to promote world peace and freedom. Ours will no longer be a nation subject to insult and humiliation. We have stood up’.

Mao’s words echoed the sentiments of anti-colonial movements from around the world, including those of leaders of movements that were not socialist, such as Jawaharlal Nehru of India and Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. For them, the decolonisation process required world peace and equality so that the formerly colonised people of the world could stand up and build their lives with dignity. Reading and reflecting upon these words in 2024 allows us to appreciate both the advances made by the world’s peoples since 1949 and the obstinacy of the old colonial powers that have long sought to prevent this new world from being built. The ongoing US-Israeli genocide against Palestinians and bombardment of Lebanon reflect the barbarousness to which the colonial powers are willing to resort as they attempt to hold us in this past that we want to transcend. The attitudes and wars imposed by the old colonial powers divert us from building our ‘own civilisation and well-being’ and from promoting ‘world peace and freedom’. Mao’s words, which are really the words of all people emerging from colonialism, offer the world a choice: either we live as adversaries with our resources poured into ugly and meaningless wars or we build a ‘community of peace-loving and freedom-loving nations of the world’.

Image
Detail of: Ye Wulin (China), 红星颂 (Ode to the Red Star), 2015.

The average life expectancy in the PRC – 77 years – exceeds the global average by four years, coming a long way from 1949, when the figure was a mere 36 years. This is one of many indicators of a society that prioritises the well-being of people and the planet. Another was explained to me by a Chinese official a few years ago, who told me about how his country planned to create a post-fossil fuel economy soon. The word ‘soon’ interested me, and I asked him how it would be possible to do something of that nature so quickly. He began to tell me about the importance of planning and marshalling resources but, when he realised that I was not asking him about the strategy for this new economy but about the timeframe, said that this could be done ‘within the next half century, maybe, if we work hard, by [2049,] the hundredth anniversary of the formation of the PRC’. The confidence in the PRC allows for this kind of long-term planning, rather than the short-term compulsions imposed on states by the logic of capitalism. This long-term attitude pervades Chinese society, and it allows the CPC the luxury to harness resources and plan decades into the future, rather than mere months or years.

It was this sort of thinking that gripped Beijing’s city managers over twenty years ago, when the rapid rise of automobiles in the capital and the burning of coal to generate heat enveloped the population in toxic smog. The national five-year plans for 2001–2005 and 2011–2015, as well as Beijing’s own Five-Year Clean Air Action Plan (2013–2017), made it clear that economic growth could not ignore the environment. The city managers began to centre their planning around public transportation and transit corridors rooted in an older Chinese urban design that built shops and apartment buildings in a way that would promote walking rather than driving. In September 2017, the city established low-emission zones to prevent polluting vehicles from entering Beijing and created incentives for the use of new energy vehicles, which are powered by electric energy. China owns 99 percent of the world’s 385,000 electric buses, 6,584 of which are on Beijing’s streets. Though there is still a long way to go for Beijing’s air to meet its own standards, the toxicity of the air has noticeably declined.

Image
Fan Wennan (China), 嫦娥同志 (Comrade Cháng’é), 2022.

In Mao’s founding speech in 1949, he declared that one of the PRC’s goals would be to foster the people’s well-being. How is it possible to do that within a neocolonial world system that enforces the poorer nations’ dependency on the former colonial powers? In the global production chain, the poorer nations produce goods at a lower cost, with wages and consumption suppressed, which allows multinational corporations (MNCs) to sell commodities for higher prices around the world and earn larger profits. These large profits are then invested by the MNCs to develop new technologies and productive forces that reinforce the permanent subordination of the poorer nations. If a poor nation exports more goods in an attempt to earn higher returns, it simply digs itself into a deeper and deeper spiral of lowered living standards for its exploited workers and into a debt trap that simply cannot be exited. It is one thing to be able to plan, but how does one acquire the resources to execute a plan?

At Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, we have been looking closely at the experience of China and other countries in the Global South that have attempted to rattle this cage of dependency. As Tings Chak and I show in an article on the 75th anniversary of the PRC, in its first decades China marshalled whatever minimal resources were available to it, including assistance from the Soviet Union, to build a new agricultural system against landlordism, create an education and health system that improved the people’s quality of life, and fight against the wretched hierarchies of the past. That first phase, from 1949 to the late 1970s, endowed China with a culture that is far more egalitarian and a population that is far more educated and in better health than those in other post-colonial states. It is the CPC’s commitment to transform people’s lives that created this possibility. In the second phase, from 1978 to the present, China has used its large labour force to attract foreign investment and technology, but it has done so in a way that ensures that science and technology will be transferred to China and that the state’s control over exchange rates will allow the CPC to raise wages (which were improved by the 2008 Labour Contract Law), avoid the middle-income trap, enhance technological capabilities, and drive state-owned enterprises to develop high-tech productive systems. That is what accounts, in large measure, for the rapid growth that China has experienced over the past decades and its ability to lift up the well-being of its population and environment within the overall structure of the neocolonial world system.

Image
Fan Wennan (China), 中国2098: 欢迎回家 (China 2098: Welcome Home), 2019–2022.

In April 2017, the Xiong’an New Area (roughly 100 kilometres south of Beijing) was officially established to accommodate five million residents in order to relieve the emergent congestion in Beijing, whose growing population of 22 million faces serious problems of scale. This is being done, for instance, by absorbing many of the non-government institutions that are currently located in the capital city (among them research, higher education, medical, and financial institutions). One of the key motivations for the construction of the Xiong’an New Area was to address the plights facing the densely populated capital without embarking on urban reconstruction that could ruin the character of this city that first emerged in 1045 BCE.

To take advantage of the clean slate afforded by building this new city, PRC officials set a zero-carbon emissions target for the Xiong’an New Area, its landscape defined by the blue-green hues of water and vegetation rather than the grey smog of a concrete jungle. The first priority as the city was planned was to rehabilitate the Baiyangdian, the largest wetland in northern China. Its water area, known as the ‘kidney of North China’, was expanded from 170 square kilometres to 290 square kilometres; its water quality was improved from Class V (unusable) to Class III (able to drink); and the critically endangered diving duck Baer’s pochard was settled in the area and now thrives on the lake. The Baiyangdian anchors the city.

The Xiong’an New Area is being built as ‘three cities’: a city above ground; an underground city of commercial centres, transportation, and pipelines (for fibre optic cables, electricity, gas, water, and sewage); and a cloud-based city that will provide data for smart transportation, digital governance, intelligent equipment inspection, elderly monitoring, and emergency response. As the National Development and Reform Commission of Hebei Province’s January report describes, the Xiong’an New Area is:

creat[ing] an urban ecological space where city and lake coexist, where city and greenery are integrated, and where forests and water are interdependent. … [It e]mphasise[s] the integration of greenways, parks, and open spaces to create a city with parks within cities and cities within parks, where people can live and enjoy nature.

Seventy-five years into its revolutionary process, China has indeed made rapid advances, though it will have to settle the many new problems that have emerged (which you can read about in the international edition of the journal Wenhua Zongheng, or 文化纵横). China’s feat of shaking the chains of dependency is worthy of detailed debate, perhaps while walking along the Baiyangdian Lake in the Xiong’an New Area.

Warmly,

Vijay

https://thetricontinental.org/newslette ... niversary/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Tue Oct 29, 2024 2:43 pm

The Economic War Against China Has Backfired
By Felix Abt - October 29, 2024 0

Image
Author Felix Abt at Luckin Coffee, a Starbucks competitor, in Shanghai. [Source: Photo courtesy of Felix Abt]

Just 15 years ago, Chinese consumers were flocking to Western brands. Now they prefer Chinese ones.

The fate of the Starbucks Group is telling: Sales and profits in its current 7,300 stores in China are declining. The Chinese are not drinking less coffee, but prefer Chinese brands, partly because they offer more for less money.

Luckin Coffee, which was only founded in 2017, is rapidly taking market share from the American market leader. Even outside of China, such as in Singapore, Luckin Coffee stores are popping up everywhere and competing with Starbucks.

Image
[Source: bloomberg.com]

Bloomberg reported that Luckin Coffee, and no longer Starbucks, is now the largest coffee retailer in China.

The turnaround of the company, which was on the verge of bankruptcy four years ago, is due to the chain’s automated stores, low-cost offerings and innovative drinks that cater to local tastes. In terms of volume, it offers the same amount of coffee, but at one-third the price of Starbucks.

Image
Price comparison of the four major coffee restaurant chains in China. [Source: twitter.com]

Luckin Coffee is not the only thriving Chinese coffee company; another example is Manner Coffee, which has opened more than 1,000 stores in China. Of course, Luckin Coffee and Manner Coffee are just two examples from one industry.

Image
Chinese coffee chain Manner. [Source: Photo courtesy of Felix Abt]

The same is happening in many other sectors. With increasing Sinophobia from the West, Chinese consumers are becoming consumer patriots who prefer Chinese products and services: In 2011, only 15% of Chinese said they would prefer Chinese over foreign brands; by 2020, 85% said they would prefer Chinese products. Given the increasingly anti-China policies and rhetoric, this proportion is likely to be even higher today.

Image
McKinsey survey: Chinese people increasingly prefer Chinese products. [Source: medium.com]

“Sanctions” to contain China
Since 2016, the U.S. has imposed thousands of sanctions and other “penalties” against China. More than 70 Chinese technology companies have been targeted by Washington, and entire regions, such as the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, have been banned (by the U.S.) from exporting goods to the U.S.

Hundreds of Chinese government officials have been banned from visiting or communicating with U.S. companies.

Not only is the economic assault continuing, but it is being relentlessly intensified, with allies allowing themselves to be used by Washington against their own interests.

The unilateral coercive measures under Washington’s leadership were implemented with the intention of “containing” China and keeping it poor, rather than allowing it to rise again.

The Trauma of the Opium Wars
This brings back extremely bad memories in China: Before the Opium Wars against China under British leadership, which began the “century of humiliation,” China’s economy was strong and self-sufficient and had a trade surplus with European countries.

Image
Opium War, which the British won thanks to better weapon technology. [Source: archives.boulderweekly.com]

Image
The forced import of opium led to a huge addiction catastrophe in China. [Source: commons.wikimedia.org]

The Chinese want to prevent the Western powers from imposing another century of humiliation on them at all costs.

Image
Headline in The Economist: “The Opium Wars still shape China’s view of the West.” [Source: economist.com]


Image
Few in the West understand China’s fear of further traumatic aggression from the West. [Source: thediplomat.com]

Huawei became too strong for the West
Huawei is one of the companies that had to be destroyed. The world’s leading manufacturer of telecommunications equipment counted 80% of the world’s 50 largest telecommunications companies among its customers. Huawei sold its products in more than 170 countries.

Image
A Huawei customer center. [Source: medium.com]

In order to eliminate this serious competitor for U.S. companies, the U.S. government ensured that Huawei no longer had access to foreign microchips and to Western and other markets. As a result, Huawei had to sell its leading computer and smartphone subsidiary Honor in 2020.

Image
The “Honor” company advertises its smartphone. [Source: honor.com]

Denied access to key components such as chips, which are essential for the production of smartphones, Huawei decided to sell its cell phone business to a lesser-known Chinese company to ensure the survival of its successful product, as the buyer could operate without the same restrictions. This move was also intended to protect Honor’s suppliers, partners and employees and ensure that the brand could maintain its market presence and continue to innovate. In 2020, Huawei parted ways with Honor completely.

Huawei’s turnover and profitability slumped dramatically. Washington almost managed to drive Huawei into bankruptcy. However, like many other Chinese companies that the U.S. wanted to kill, Huawei has reinvented itself and resurrected itself as China’s most productive high-tech company. It is expanding into new sectors such as port automation and electric vehicles.

Image
Huawei has recovered from the boycott by the U.S. and allied countries. [Source: koreaherald.com]

Huawei, which is once again manufacturing laptops and cell phones using only Chinese components, is currently taking significant market share from Apple, which used to be highly profitable in China.

Image
[Source: ft.com]
What the major Western media did not report, the Indian business and financial news service “ET NOW” did: Apple was defeated by Huawei in its largest overseas market.


ET Now reports that “Huawei’s rise is attributed to its in-house development of a chip.” Unable to co-exist and compete peacefully with China, Washington’s embargo policy forced Chinese companies to innovate and become self-reliant. As a result, in the not too distant future, U.S. companies risk being outcompeted by hi-tech developed independently by the Chinese. [Source: youtube.com]

Today, China accounts for 70% of Huawei’s revenue.

Huawei not only produces excellent products and services, but has also positioned itself as China’s national champion. Chinese consumers, who have been anxiously watching the economic assault by foreign powers on Huawei and countless other Chinese companies, sided with the “underdog,” recalling the centuries of humiliation China suffered at the hands of foreign powers in the not-too-distant past.

Decline and outflow of foreign investment
There are headlines all over the world about the exodus of investors from China. This is partly because foreign investors are afraid of being penalized by Washington. Even Tesla cars made in China and exported to the U.S. are now subject to high U.S. import taxes. Other products that foreign investors manufacture in China are also being targeted.

The withdrawal of foreign investment is not the end of China. It is merely a reaction to the weaponization of foreign investment and trade by the U.S. and, what is more, to the failure of Western companies in the Chinese market.

U.S. car manufacturers, which sold millions of cars in China every year and made billions of dollars in profits, are no longer competitive and are scaling back their investments.

The outflow of foreign investment from China reflects two things: the threat to foreign investment from U.S. anti-China policies and the loss of competitiveness of foreign investors in China. The increase in Chinese investment abroad reflects the increased competitiveness of Chinese companies, which are capturing more and more market share outside China, including market share from the same competitors that are losing out in China’s domestic markets.

China has the largest middle class (with substantial savings) in the world, which continues to grow, in contrast to the Western middle classes, which are shrinking and becoming increasingly indebted. There is still plenty of room for expansion for companies that cater to the needs of the Chinese middle class. But it would not be surprising if Starbucks were to leave China in the not-too-distant future. After all, it is what Western China hawks have longed and worked so hard for.

Image
The affluent middle class has grown considerably in China and will continue to do so. [Source: medium.com]

It will do the U.S. little harm if its remaining companies lose the world’s largest market—measured in terms of purchasing power parity and not GDP. This is because the United States already has a large trade deficit with China and, unlike Japan, South Korea and the European Union, it is not a strong exporter.

But the U.S.’s allies will suffer a considerable economic setback if they support Washington’s tough anti-China measures. Chinese customers will no longer be well-disposed toward them. This will jeopardize the prosperity of their populations. China has the advantage that its growing domestic economy accounts for the lion’s share of its overall economy.

In the worst-case scenario, China’s economy could become self-sufficient and strong as it was before the Opium Wars.

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/1 ... backfired/

******

The Long March: 90 years on and its lessons for our struggles today

Artist and researcher Tings Chak reflects on The Long March waged by communists in China at its 90th anniversary

October 28, 2024 by Tings Chak

Image
“Marching on the blood of the martyrs”, the words inscribed at the monument to the comrades of the Long March in Ruijin, Jiangxi.

The Long March (1934-1935) led by the Chinese communists is probably one of the greatest revolutionary feats of the 20th century. 90 years ago this month, the Red Army and its peasant supporters began their year-long journey, traversing 9,000 kilometers, 18 mountains, and 24 rivers. Wearing sandals made from dried grasses, they marched an average of 50 kilometers per day and engaged in some battle every 72 hours, meanwhile being pursued by airstrikes from above and hundreds of thousands of enemy soldiers from behind. Of the 86,000 people who had been organized into four columns and set off on the trek, many starved, were killed, defected, or gave up along the way. Only 8,000 soldiers were left at the end of the Long March. It was “an Odyssey unequal in modern times,” as US journalist Edgar Snow put it.

This year marks the 90th anniversary of the start of the Long March as well as the 75th anniversary of the PRC. This historic Odyssey is a story that has been told and retold countless times by revolutionaries around the world. Looking back, it may seem distant and remote from today’s reality. Nevertheless, some key lessons and inspirations can be drawn from this history for the struggles of today, including the importance of organization, socialist experimentation, mobilization of the masses, and unification of political forces to advance a national and revolutionary project.

Crossing the river while feeling the stones
Crossing the river while feeling the stones is a slogan first coined by Communist Party of China (CPC) leader Chun Yun in 1950 and has been closely associated with Deng Xiaoping’s reform and opening-up, beginning in 1978. However, it can easily be a slogan used to describe the whole Chinese revolutionary process. The Long March was one of those major crossings of the communist movement into the unknown, leaving behind the Chinese Soviet Republic that they had formed in 1931 in the south of China. After a series of failed uprisings led by the still-small urban proletariat in the late 1920s, a section of the communists led by Mao Zedong retreated to the countryside from the Chinese Workers and Peasants’ Red Army. Although the CPC’s central command was still based in Shanghai, dominated by the Moscow-trained leaders, the communists led by Mao began to form small soviets, culminating in the Chinese Soviet Republic in Ruijin, Jiangxi.

By the time of the Long March, six years later, the Soviet region had undergone land reform and redistributed to the peasants, collective enterprises in different sectors were established, over 10,000 co-operatives had been created, and the small group of revolutionary soldiers who fled the cities had grown into an army of several tens of thousands of workers and peasants. In order to break the economic and informational blockade imposed by the Nationalists (KMT), the first banks of the CPC were formed – producing 1-yuan notes with Lenin’s portrait on it – along with media instruments, like the predecessor of the Xinhua News Agency. Furthermore, unemployment, opium, prostitution, child slavery, and compulsory marriage had been eliminated. As Edgar Snow described in his book, “Red Star Over China”, mass education had increased the literacy levels of peasants in a few years to more than what had been done in all rural China for centuries.

The years spent in this region engaged in building the CPC’s mass line, experimentations with new forms of governance, and defending the red base from external attacks, were formative experiences for Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, Zhu De, Deng Xiaoping, and other revolutionaries of that generation, and was a crucial site in the formation of the Thought of Mao Zedong. In other words, socialist construction and experimentation did not begin when the CPC took power in 1949 but was built off the two decades of experiments and experiences from Ruijin to Yan’an, of crossing the river while feeling the stones.

Exterminate the menace of communism.
The Long March was a strategic retreat from Ruijin, after rounds of military assaults on the Soviet by the Nationalists led by Chiang Kai-shek. For the fifth and final encirclement campaign, Chiang mobilized up to 900,000 troops with superior resources, technical equipment, mechanized warfare (including 400 war planes), and ample supplies from the outside world, while receiving military guidance of Nazi German advisors. The communists, on the other hand, had the strength of 180,000 soldiers and with a very limited supply of munitions and weapons, mostly rifles and no heavy artillery. The siege was expected to be a funeral march for the communists, and even Chiang had believed he had finally “exterminated the menace of Communism”. But they were wrong. As the first two columns organized a surprise attack to break through the southern and western fortifications, thousands of peasant guards stayed behind to stave off the Nationalist forces. It took them several weeks to complete their occupation of the Soviet territories; in exchange for their lives, they bought time for the Communists columns to make their strategic retreat.

Beyond mere survival, the following are three important achievements and lessons of the Long March, the first being the consolidation of Mao Zedong’s leadership of the CPC. Halfway through the Long March, the Zunyi Conference was held in which the CPC’s Politburo was elected. Mao Zedong emerged as the Party’s highest leader and its chairman, displacing the former political nucleus lead by Bo Gu, of the “28 Bolsheviks” who had returned from studying at the Sun Yatsen University in Moscow. This Conference consolidated the direction of the revolutionary strategy with the peasantry at its center. History, of course, is not only made up of individuals – although leaders do matter – but it is based on the organized power of the masses.

Do not take a single need or piece of thread from the masses.
The second great achievement of the Long March was the mobilization of mass power of the peasant majority, ethnic minorities, youth, and women under the leadership of the communists. Already during the Ruijin period, the Red Army had systematized their method of work in the countryside, summarized in the “Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention” issued in 1928. The Three Rules included: Obey orders in all your actions; do not take a single need or piece of thread from the masses; and turn in everything captured. The Eight Points were: speak politely; pay fairly for what you buy; return everything you borrow; pay for anything you damage; do not hit or swear at people; do not damage crops; do not take liberties with women; and do not ill-treat captives. With these well-honed practices that greatly contrasted the brutal approach of the Nationalists, feudal landlords, and warlords, the communists gained mass support wherever they traveled to. More than a retreat, the Long March became an opportunity of massification of the Party into the interior of the country.

In particular, the communists traveled through ten ethnic minority regions, where Miao, Yao, Zhuang, Dong, Tujia, Shui, Li, Buyi, Gelao, Naxi, Yi, Tibetan, Bai, Qiang, Hui, Dongxiang, and Yugu peoples lived, accounting for more than half of the territories that the Red Army passed through during the Long March. During this time, the CPC promoted their political program while advocating equality among all ethnic groups and opposing ethnic oppression, and helped ethnic minorities to carry out economic and political struggles against local landlords and warlords. Without the support of the local Yi people, for example, the Red Army would have never successfully passed through Daliangshan, Sichuan. In turn, a special detachment of the Chinese Yi People’s Red Army was formed there.

Youth played an important role during the Long March, and young people dominated the Party from the lowest to the highest ranks from the Ruijin to Yan’an periods. By 1936, the average age of rank and file of the Red Army was only 19 years, meanwhile the CPC leadership that had already been in the Party for over a decade, was only in their 30s and 40s. Meanwhile, women played a key role, not only in the provisions of food and clothing for the Red Army soldiers along the way but were also participants on the Long March. 32 women marched with the First Army, all of whom survived, with their main tasks being in agitation and propaganda, taking care of the wounded soldiers, and gathering the supplies and financial resources for the Red Army. It is only with the mass support of local peasants, ethnic minorities, women, and youth that the communists were able to navigate treacherous landscape, evade enemy attacks, get enough food and supplies to survive, and complete the Long March.

The third achievement of the Long March was the unification of the country against Japanese imperialism. While mobilizing and conscientizing the masses throughout the country, the communists also charted a course that later became the Second United Front beginning in 1936. In other words, the objective was to unite all classes and all patriotic forces in communist-led fight against Japanese imperialism, which was seen as the primary contradiction. Rarely mentioned in Western version of the Second World War are the 20 million Chinese people who died resisting Japanese fascism, during a brutal occupation that lasted 14 years (1931-1945).

The Chinese people have stood up.
In October 1935, a mere 8,000 Red Army soldiers arrived in Yan’an, in the north-central province of Shaanxi. An important site of Chinese civilization and people with roots tracing back 3,000 years, Yan’an had become a poor, dusty, and remote frontier town of above 10,000 inhabitants by the time the communists made it their new capital. As one of the soldiers told journalist Edgar Snow, “This is culturally one of the darkest places on earth… We have to start everything from the beginning.” And start everything again they did, building from the experiences of the Ruijin Soviet period.

In the “Yan’an decade” that followed, the ragtag group of poorly-fed and poorly-equipped communists would mobilize the support of tens of millions of peasants in the region, gain popular support in the cities, grow its active Party membership to 1.2 million people, and build a Red Army made up of one million soldiers, supported by millions more armed peasants. October 1949, 14 years after arriving in Yan’an, Mao Zedong would declare the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing. Today, as the PRC celebrates its 75th anniversary, the CPC is an organization of over 98 million members. The Long March remains a revolutionary inspiration and thread that connects the different periods of socialist experimentation from Ruijin to Yan’an to Beijing.

During the Cultural Revolution, president Xi Jinping was sent as a teenager from Beijing to Yan’an to live humbly in the cave – just as the Long March generation did – and work alongside the peasant. It was there that he joined the CPC – after nine failed attempts – and started his political life as a village party secretary. His father, Xi Zhongxun, was one of the first-generation leaders that participated on the Long March to Yan’an, and became the vice-premier of the PRC. One of the big regrets of Mao Zedong and that generation of leaders is that they never went back to Ruijin after the Long March, since it was such a hard-to-reach mountainous region. Today, almost every family in Ruijin still carries a story of a family member who had left on the journey and never returned, or who had stayed behind to resist the enemy forces. In one village named Huawu, where I visited last year, each person from that community who went on the Long March is memorialized by a tree planted in their honor.

Ruijin is called the ‘cradle’ of the Chinese revolution because, in its few years of existence, it became the experimental ground for socialist construction. Ruijin is where the CPC built its revolutionary rural strategy, with the peasantry as its base, and where the communists set off on the historic Long March in 1934. It is also where the foundations were laid for the CPC’s own structure, the Red Army’s tactics and strategies, and the policies of economic, social, and land reform that would be later implemented by the PRC. 90 years after the Long March set off from there, Ruijin is going through its new phase of socialist construction, from the eradication of extreme poverty to the revitalization of the rural economy, building towards a modern socialist future.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/10/28/ ... les-today/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Sat Nov 02, 2024 2:26 pm

Image

Report back from Xinjiang: A first-hand account of innovation and diversity

Date Tuesday 19 November 2024
Time 6:30pm Britain / 1:30pm US Eastern
Venue Marx Memorial Library
London EC1R 0DU
And Zoom

Register on eventbrite
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/report-b ... 8918767809

Speakers
Roger McKenzie – Foreign Editor, Morning Star
Ali Al-Assam – Friends of Socialist China; Director, Mushtarek
David Peat – Editor, Iskra Books; Secretary, Friends of Socialist China Britain committee
Chair: Fiona S – Friends of Socialist China
Information
While much of the global narrative surrounding Xinjiang has focused on accusations of human rights abuses, it’s crucial to ask whether these claims are rooted in fact or driven by geopolitical motives. What does the West truly know about Xinjiang, beyond the allegations?

Rather than accept unverified accusations at face value, it is important to explore the real story: Xinjiang’s tremendous achievements in areas like clean energy, robotics, and transport, which the West could learn from. How has the region embraced such rich cultural and religious diversity, including the celebration of Uyghur traditions and the region’s harmonious multicultural coexistence?

Xinjiang is not only a hub of technological advancement but also plays a pivotal role in China’s Belt and Road Initiative—a global trade and infrastructure project with significant implications for the future of international cooperation. What lessons can be drawn from Xinjiang’s success as the economic and strategic heart of this initiative, especially in cities like Kashgar, a crucial link between East and West?

Join us for an in-person event at Marx Memorial Library, where Roger McKenzie, Ali Al-Assam and David Peat will share their firsthand experiences from their recent visits to Xinjiang. Through their insights, we can explore what the world might learn from Xinjiang’s advancements and how it challenges the prevailing narrative in the West.

Organisers
This event is organised by Friends of Socialist China and supported by the Morning Star and the International Manifesto Group.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/10/31/r ... diversity/

Image

A retired railroader looks at China’s fantastic rail system
The following article, first published in Struggle for Socialism / La Lucha por el Socialismo, compares the state of the US and Chinese railroad systems. The US system is in a state of disrepair, with a lack of investment and a focus on profit over service. In contrast, China has built a high-speed rail network that is the envy of the world, with trains that are fast, efficient, and affordable. The article notes that “China has built twice as many miles of high-speed rail than the rest of the world combined”. Further: “Last year, Chinese railways carried 3.68 billion passengers. That’s 10 million passengers daily, a hundred times Amtrak’s ridership.”

The parlous state of the US’s railway infrastructure is “the result of decades of a capitalist class allowing much of the railroad system to decay”. Pointing out that almost all of China’s rail network is state-owned, the article concludes:

We need what the People’s Republic of China has: a socialist railroad system. The people need to take over the railroads.

The author, Stephen Millies, is a retired Amtrak worker and a member of the American Train Dispatchers Association and Transportation Communications International Union.
A telling comparison between capitalist decay in the United States and surging economic growth in the socialist People’s Republic of China is in their railroad systems.

Between 1950 and 2000, more than 79,000 miles of railroad lines were abandoned in the United States. Passenger service, now run by Amtrak, has withered.

Meanwhile, China has greatly increased its railroad network and now has 100,000 miles of track. China has built twice as many miles of high-speed rail than the rest of the world combined.

Last year, Chinese railways carried 3.68 billion passengers. That’s 10 million passengers daily, a hundred times Amtrak’s ridership.

China’s railroads are on schedule to move 4 billion metric tons of freight in 2024. That’s about three times the U.S. total.

Socialist China will invest almost $108 billion in its railroads this year. That’s four-and-half times the $23 billion railroad monopolies in the capitalist United States spend on average.

How about urban transport? China has 55 cities with subway systems. Just in Beijing, three new metro lines will open this year.

In contrast, New York City has been trying to complete the construction of the Second Avenue subway for a century. Wall Street’s hometown may be the only metropolis with less rapid transit than it had in the 1930s. That’s because elevated lines were torn down without replacing them with subways.

The biggest victims of capitalist railroad shrinkage in the U.S. are railroad workers. There were two million workers on the railroads in 1920.

The Great Depression helped reduce railroad employment to 1.5 million workers in 1947. Since then, railroad jobs have fallen by 90%, with just 151,200 railroaders working in August 2024.

That’s a smaller number of railroad workers than in 1870, one year after the first transcontinental railroad in the United States was completed. These massive job cuts devastated railroad towns coast to coast.

Railroads and racism
Before any railroads were built in China, 15,000 Chinese immigrants were indispensable to building the transcontinental railroad across the Sierra Nevada mountains in California and Nevada. At least a thousand were killed.

Chinese workers, who were 90% of the Central Pacific’s workforce, were paid as low as $26 a month, considerably less than their white counterparts. When they went on strike in 1867 over these dangerous conditions and low pay, their demands were ignored by the wealthy railroad moguls.

These tycoons included Leland Stanford, who founded Stanford University, and Charles Crocker, whose Crocker National Bank was merged into Wells Fargo in 1986.

When you hear reactionaries from Stanford University and its Hoover Institution attack the People’s Republic of China, remember that Stanford’s endowment includes the blood of Chinese immigrants.

Chinese workers were not given any thanks for their vital contribution. At the May 10, 1969, centennial of the Golden Spike ceremony, marking the transcontinental railroad’s completion — now all part of the Union Pacific — Transportation Secretary John Volpe refused even to mention the Chinese railroad workers.

Two years after the Golden Spike, working people in Paris “stormed heaven,” in Karl Marx’s words, and formed the Paris Commune, the first working-class government. The same year, in Los Angeles, then a village with a population of 6,000, 18 Chinese people were lynched in an 1871 pogrom.

Ten percent of the local Chinese population were murdered. Sixty years later, the city’s Chinese community was forced to move so Union Station could be built.

In the capitalist United States, railroads and racism went hand-in-hand. Before the Civil War, 9,000 miles of railroads were built by enslaved Africans.

Thousands more miles of tracks were laid after the Civil War by Black prisoners. Among them was the “steel-driving man” John Henry, who was worked to death building the Chesapeake and Ohio, now part of the CSX system. The capitalist running the C&O was Collis P. Huntington, one of the Central Pacific’s founders.

Another big railroad capitalist was the former slave owner Johns Hopkins, whose fortune came from the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (B&O), now also part of CSX. His loot established Johns Hopkins University and its medical school in Baltimore.

General George Custer had it coming. He died for the Northern Pacific — now part of billionaire Warren Buffet’s BNSF — that was invading Lakota Sioux land.

Capitalism vs. socialism
About 41 high-speed trains travel daily between the Chinese capital of Beijing and Shanghai. They take around four-and-a-half hours to make the 819-mile trip.

Amtrak has one train, the Capitol Limited, between Washington D.C. and Chicago. It takes 17.5 hours to cover the 764-mile distance.

None of this is the fault of Amtrak workers. It’s the result of decades of a capitalist class allowing much of the railroad system to decay.

On Oct. 1, 1949, Mao Zedong declared that “China has stood up.” The People’s Republic of China was born. At the time there were maybe 12,000 miles of operable railroad track in the country.

Seventy-five years later, China’s railroad network has increased eight times in length and many more times in capacity. Almost all of it is owned and operated by the socialist government. There are 2.2 million railroad workers in China.

U.S. railroads were so dangerous that one in nine rail workers was injured in 1909. One in 205 were killed.

The response of the old Interstate Commerce Commission – abolished in 1996 in the name of deregulation – was to stop collecting these embarrassing statistics. (“The Economic History of the United States” by Ernest Bogart)

Two years ago, railroad tycoons like Warren Buffett refused to agree to sick days for railroaders whose work schedules could include any time of day or night, any day of the week.

We need what the People’s Republic of China has: a socialist railroad system. The people need to take over the railroads.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/10/28/a ... il-system/

Image

People’s China and Western Marxism
On Thursday 24 October, Friends of Socialist China participated in an event in New York City to celebrate the release of two revolutionary books: People’s China at 75: The Flag Stays Red, and Western Marxism by Domenico Losurdo, translated into English for the first time.

The event, which was held at the International Action Center HQ, featured a panel discussion with Carlos Martinez (co-editor of People’s China at 75), Gabriel Rockhill (editor of Western Marxism), and Danny Haiphong (independent journalist and broadcaster). The panel was chaired by Sara Flounders of the International Action Center.

Embedded below is a video of the event, which was live-streamed on Danny Haiphong’s YouTube channel, followed by the approximate text of Carlos’s remarks connecting the two books.

What was the reason for putting People’s China at 75 together?

The main motivation was that this milestone, the 75th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, when Mao Zedong famously proclaimed in Tiananmen Square that “the Chinese people have stood up”, provided an opportunity to reflect on the significance of that event.

And it’s an evolving significance. The Chinese people are still living that history; indeed the world is living that history. The Chinese Revolution changed the world forever, and the processes of building socialism and struggling against imperialism are ongoing processes that modern China is very much a part of.

So we wanted to examine China’s trajectory since 1949 and to help people get to grips with China’s socialist project in all its different phases. Certainly this is a topic that’s very little understood in the Western world, including among many on the left.

And that’s perhaps where the overlap lies between the two books we’re discussing this evening.

The Western Marxism described by Losurdo is essentially dogmatic; it considers socialism from an abstract, purely theoretical viewpoint.

For these Western Marxists, it’s a handful of academics spending their time in conferences and writing vast impenetrable volumes that are at the cutting edge of knowledge production.

For the Eastern Marxists on the other hand – the people that are oriented to the actually existing struggle against imperialism and for socialism – it’s precisely those states, movements and parties that are engaged in the process of building socialism and struggling against hegemony that are making the major contribution to moving humanity’s collective understanding forward.

The dialectical relationship between theory and practice is at the core of Marxism. As Mao famously put it in his essay ‘On Practice’, “if you want knowledge, you must take part in the practice of changing reality. If you want to know the taste of a pear, you must change the pear by eating it yourself.”

Abstract theory won’t help us much when it comes to understanding modern China.

Where in Marx’s Capital or Theories of Surplus Value can you find a reference point for China’s reform and opening up process, which was launched in 1978? Nowhere.

Apart from anything else, Marx and Engels didn’t live to see the emergence of socialist states – beyond the early experiment of the Paris Commune – and couldn’t be expected to predict what problems might face a socialist state, recently emerged from semi-colonial semi-feudal status, thirty years after its founding, faced with imperialist encirclement and nuclear blackmail, and dealing with the responsibility of feeding a fifth of the world’s population with 6 percent of the world’s arable land.

Just as no battle plan survives contact with the enemy, no revolutionary process proceeds along straight and predictable lines. Or as Lenin put it when discussing the heroic 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland: “Whoever expects a ‘pure’ social revolution will never live to see it. Such a person pays lip service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.”

People see huge inequality in China, people see private capital in China, people see billionaires in China, people see McDonalds and KFC in China, and they pronounce: this isn’t socialism.

But what about the elimination of absolute poverty? What about the extraordinary improvements in people’s living standards? What about the fact that in this vast Asian country of 1.4 billion people, nobody suffers malnutrition, everybody has sufficient food, everybody has a roof over their head, everyone has clothing, everyone has access to education, healthcare, running water and modern energy.

Here we are in New York, in the heart of global capitalism. Do people here have those basic rights? How far would I have to walk from this building to find someone that doesn’t have a roof over their head, or who doesn’t have healthcare? I suspect not very far.

Why is it that China’s been able to solve these problems? Why is it that China is so focused on living standards and meeting people’s most fundamental human rights? Why is it that China is so far out in front when it comes to renewable energy, electric vehicles, forestation and biodiversity protection? Why is it that China made so much effort to prevent loss of life during the Covid-19 pandemic, whereas in the US over a million people died?

Clearly, the answer relates to China’s economic, political and social project. That China remains on the path to socialism, that has a mixed economy in which the commanding heights are publicly owned, that is run by a Marxist-Leninist party, and where the capitalist class is denied the right to organise in its own political interests.

So in terms of the line Losurdo draws in Western Marxism, I think it’s reasonable to say that on one side of that line you have people who only criticise and condemn China, who label it as capitalist or imperialist, who push the slogan ‘Neither Washington Nor Beijing’; and on the other side you have people who stand in solidarity with China, who seek to learn from China, who showcase China as an example of what can be achieved under socialism, and who resolutely oppose the US’s plans to contain and encircle China.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: China

Post by blindpig » Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:40 pm

FT Confirms What We’ve Been Saying for Three Years: The US Is Losing the “Battle… for Latin America” to China
Posted on November 22, 2024 by Nick Corbishley

“Beijing is now the main trading partner for most nations in the region and has the fastest-growing stock of investments.”

On August 17, 2021, we published an article titled “The US Is Losing Power and Influence Even In Its Own Back Yard.” It was the first in a series of articles that have traced how China has gradually surpassed the US as South America’s main trading partner and has even begun chipping away at US economic dominance over parts of Central America, the Caribbean and, more recently, Mexico. From that initial article:

Unlike the US, China generally does not try to dictate how its trading partners should behave and what sorts of rules, norms, principles and ideology they should adhere to. What China does — or at least has by and large done over the past few decades until now — is to trade with and invest in countries that have goods — particularly commodities — it covets…

In Latin America and the Caribbean it has worked a treat. China’s rise in the region coincided almost perfectly with the Global War on Terror. As Washington shifted its attention and resources away from its immediate neighbourhood to the Middle East, where it frittered away trillions of dollars spreading mayhem and death and breeding new terrorists, China began snapping up Latin American resources. Governments across the region, from Brazil to Venezuela, to Ecuador and Argentina, took a leftward turn and began working together across various fora. The commodity supercycle was born.

China’s trade with the region grew 26-fold between 2000 and 2020, from $12 billion to $315 billion, and is expected to more than double by 2035, to more than $700 billion.

[Recent data suggest it is well on track to achieving that. In 2023, the total trade volume between China and Latin America reached a record $480 billion, according to China’s National Customs Administration]

In the last 20 years China has moved from an almost negligible position as a source of imports and destination of exports within the region to become its second trade partner, at the expense not just of the US but also Europe and certain Latin American countries such as Brazil whose share of inter-regional trade has fallen. According to the World Economic Forum, “China will approach—and could even surpass—the US as LAC’s top trading partner. In 2000, Chinese participation accounted for less than 2% of LAC’s total trade. In 2035, it could reach 25%.”

A Thousand-Word Photo?

The potential ramifications of China’s rise to dominance of South America, a region whose fortunes and resources have been largely controlled by Europeans and their North American descendants for the best part of the past 500 years, appear to be finally dawning on the West. The German broadcaster DW reported last week that “Alarm bells are ringing in the United States,” citing an article by Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung:

“As a supplier of raw materials, South America has great economic importance for China’s development. This is where 45 percent of the agricultural products traded on the world market come from. Meat and soybean exports are particularly important for the nutrition of the Chinese population. South America also supplies two fundamental minerals for the energy transition: lithium and copper. Two-thirds of the known lithium reserves and forty percent of the copper reserves are located in the region. Chile and Peru are the two largest copper producers in the world. (…)

Spain’s El País warned that the Asian giant is expanding its political and economic influence in the region, eroding the role of the West and putting Washington and Brussels on alert. The Financial Times appears to have reached the same conclusion. In a “Global Insight” op-ed on Wednesday, the pink paper’s Latin American editor, Michael Stott, averred that Joe Biden has lost to Xi Jinping in the “battle for Latin-America”:

“Beijing is now the main trading partner for most nations in the region and has the fastest-growing stock of investments.”

The article notes that Biden’s farewell trip to Brazil and Peru “epitomises Washington’s waning influence” in the region, citing photos from last week’s Apec summit in Peru and this week’s G20 meeting in Brazil as visual proof of that waning influence. In both photos Xi Jinping stands front and centre in the first row while Biden “lingers near the end of the back row in one picture and is absent from the other.” There are, however, official explanations for this that have nothing to do with the US and China’s relative strategic influence:

In the first picture at last week’s Apec summit in Peru, leaders stood in alphabetical order, which favoured China over a rival superpower starting with U. In the second, shot at this week’s G20 meeting in Rio de Janeiro, US diplomats said the group photo was taken early, before Biden had arrived.

As we can see in this photo of the 2016 Apec summit, also in Peru, Obama was also close to the end of the back row.

Image

Nonetheless, as the op-ed notes, “the summit photographs serve as metaphors for the eclipse of the US by China in Latin America, a region that Washington used to call its backyard,” and which Biden has called its “front yard”, as if that were somehow better.

China Making Moves

A better illustration of the two rival superpowers’ sharply contrasting approaches in Latin America was on display last week at the opening of Peru’s Chancay megaport, at which Xi Jinping made a guest appearance. What was China’s paramount leader doing attending the inauguration of a Peruvian port? First, he was already in Peru to attend the Apec Summit; and second, Chancay is as much, if not more, Chinese than it is Peruvian since it is majority financed and owned by Chinese state-owned company Cosco Shipping.

This has raised questions about Peru’s sovereignty. From DW:

In 2021, the national port authority granted Cosco exclusivity to operate Chancay. When this clause was made public, there was a nationwide outcry in Peru.

In March of this year, the government asked the judiciary to annul this provision. (…) But in June, President Dina Boluarte backtracked under pressure from China and abandoned the request to annul the clause. At the same time, the Peruvian Congress adjusted the port law, so that exclusive rights are now allowed for Cosco.

With an estimated total cost of $3.6 billion, the half-finished port in Chancay represents one of the most important infrastructure projects China has spearheaded in the region. The first phase of construction has already cost $1.3 billion and the next five phases will see further investments of another $2.3 billion through 2032.

Chancay is the first port on South America’s Pacific coast that will be able to receive ultra-large vessels – which can transport more than 18,000 containers — and it is hotly tipped to become the main maritime node in Latin America, especially if China’s ambition to forge a new maritime-land corridor between China and Latin America bears fruit.

“China wishes, together with Peru, to use the port of Chancay as a starting point to create a new land and sea corridor between China and Latin America, connecting the Inca Trail with the 21st century Maritime Silk Road, and opening a path to shared prosperity for Peru and for the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean,” Xi said on Thursday during a bilateral meeting with Peruvian President Dina Boluarte, according to Chinese media.

The idea of building a land corridor connecting South America’s Pacific and Atlantic seaboards is hardly a new one. In fact, it has been on the drawing board since the late 19th century. In 2007, the then-heads of state of Brazil, Bolivia and Chile, Lula da Silva, Evo Morales and Michelle Bachelet, agreed to undertake efforts to build a land route connecting the Atlantic port of Santos (Brazil) with the Pacific ports of Arica and Iquique (Chile) or Port of Ilo (Peru) and expedite custom procedures along that route.

But progress has been sporadic. In 2013, Xi Jinping proposed the construction of a 3,755-kilometer-long Central Bioceanic Railway Corridor connecting Peru, Bolivia and Brazil, with the goal of improving the efficiency of international freight transport, optimizing export logistics and promoting regional integration. The project received fresh impetus in 2023 thanks to an agreement between the presidents of Bolivia and Brazil, Luis Arce and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, to reactivate this ambitious infrastructure initiative.

Where’s the US Marshall Plan for Latin America?

While Xi Jinping celebrated the opening of the Chancay sea port, the Biden Administration promised to deliver nine Black Hawk helicopters for a $65mn anti-drug programme. Peru, together with Ecuador and Argentina, recently signed an agreement with the US to intensify cooperation in the War on Drugs — a war whose real purpose it to maintain US geostrategic dominance in key, normally resource-rich regions of the world.

But that wasn’t all: Biden also announced the donation of second-hand diesel trains from California for the Lima metro system.

“It was such a striking contrast,” Michael Shifter, adjunct professor at Georgetown University, told the FT. “You have this huge Chinese mega-port project that evoked Peru’s history going back to the Incas and seeking greatness. And then what Biden delivered was some more helicopters for coca eradication. That seems completely outdated and stale.”

During his visit to Brazil, Xi discussed multibillion-dollar Chinese investments while signing a joint declaration with Luiz Inácio da Silva to raise the status of their countries’ bilateral relationship to a “Community of a shared future Brazil-China for a more just and sustainable world”. Likewise in Peru, Xi signed a declaration with President Dina Boluarte to upgrade their countries’ bilateral free trade agreement and express readiness to cooperate on large-scale infrastructure projects in accordance with their respective national laws.

The contrast with the US could not be starker. During his brief stay in Brazil, Biden announced a $50mn donation to a conservation fund. And that was about it. And this has been more or less the story of the past two decades of US interaction with Latin America. Even as Washington has grown more and more agitated about Beijing’s rising influence in its “back yard”, it has not come close to matching China’s economic footprint in the region.

A few months ago, General Laura Richardson, the now-retired commander of US Southern Command, called for a new Marshall Plan for Latin America in order to counter Chinese and Russian influence in the region. But beyond military helicopters and diesel trains, there is little to show for it. As Shifter told the FT, the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity, an initiative touted by Biden as an answer to Beijing, was “all dressed up very nicely. But when it comes down to committing real resources, there’s nothing there.”

In a recent interview, Ben Rhodes, Obama’s former deputy national security advisor for strategic communications, warned that Washington is rapidly running out of time to change its ways: “while the US is watching the Trump show, the rest of the world has moved on; they’re aligning around China or they’re neutral like Lula.”

This video is a must-watch. I rarely agree with @brhodes but he's 100% correct here.

He says he'll "always be haunted" by a comment that Xi Jinping made to Obama in 2016 when referring to Trump: "If an immature leader throws the world into chaos, the world will know who to… pic.twitter.com/DyKNQw1aPq

— Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) November 22, 2024


Even Argentina’s anti-communist, fanatically US and Israel-aligned President Javier Milei had a brief meeting with Xi on the side lines of the G20 summit, the outcome of which was a joint pledge from both leaders “to continue working on strengthening their [countries’] commercial ties and on the development of joint projects.”

“China expressed its interest in increasing trade with the Argentine Republic, while Argentina expressed its vocation to diversify and increase its supply of exports to the Chinese market,” said Milei’s spokesman Manuel Adorni after the meeting with the Chinese government, adding: “Both nations agreed to continue working on strengthening their trade ties and developing joint projects that benefit both economies.”

This is arguably one of the most impressive testaments to China’s rising influence in South America — the fact that a national leader who a year ago was calling the Chinese government “murderous” and was pledging to “never to do business with communists” just met up with Xi and pledged to expand trade with China. Milei, never one to worry about betraying his word to voters, was so pleased with the meeting that he posted a photo of him and Xi on his twitter account.

El Presidente Javier Milei se reunió con el Presidente de la República Popular China, Xi Jinping, en Río de Janeiro. pic.twitter.com/49uaV2nsia

— Oficina del Presidente (@OPRArgentina) November 19, 2024


Milei is also hoping that his close ties with Donald J Trump and his near-total alignment with US foreign policy will also yield economic dividends for Argentina, particularly with regard to Argentina’s foreign debt to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), where the United States has veto power as the majority member of the organization. Milei is also keen to sign a trade agreement with the US, but he is likely to be disappointed.

In his first presidency, Trump visited Latin America only once and that was to attend the 2018 G20 summit in Buenos Aires. By contrast, this was Xi’s third visit to Peru and the third time he had met with its President Dina Boluarte in a year.

If anything, a new Trump administration, with Marco Rubio installed as secretary of state, is likely to play the role of spoiler in the region — even more so than recent governments. As Matias Spektor of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo told the FT, there is little prospect of Trump boosting US trade and investment in Latin America. And if Washington cannot compete with Beijing on economic terms, it will instead try to make life more difficult for Chinese investors by pressuring Latin American countries to curb China’s presence while more generally stirring the pot in the region.

The Trump transition team is already talking about taking punitive action against Chancay. Mauricio Claver-Carone, an adviser to Donald Trump’s transition team, has proposed applying a 60% tariff to products from China and other Latin American countries that pass through the port. Claver-Carone cites two motives for taking such action: to address concerns that the port could become an entry point for low-cost goods from China, and to discourage Latin American countries from allowing the Chinese regime to build strategic infrastructure in their territories.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/11 ... china.html

******

Image

Xi Jinping meets with Mexican President Sheinbaum and Bolivian President Arce
Among the bilateral meetings that Chinese President Xi Jinping held with his counterparts on the sidelines of the recent 19th G20 Leaders’ Summit, held in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro, particular significance should be attached to those with two of Latin America’s progressive leaders.

On November 18, President Xi met with Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, the recently elected President of Mexico.

Xi said that China and Mexico should continue to enhance exchanges, renew friendship, make good use of the highly complementary nature of the two economies, constantly advance practical cooperation and push for all-round development of bilateral relations in the new era. He once again congratulated Sheinbaum on becoming the first female president in the history of Mexico, and recalled his visit to Mexico in 2013, which he said had left a deep and unforgettable impression.

Sheinbaum expressed her pleasure in meeting Xi, noting that she fully agrees with Xi’s assessment of the relationship between the two countries. Although Mexico and China are far apart in distance, their ties are very close. She also expressed her gratitude for China’s generous and sincere assistance during Mexico’s difficult times, such as the hurricane disaster, which is testament to the friendship between the two peoples.

The following day, Xi met with Bolivian President Luis Arce and called on China and Bolivia to align the Belt and Road Initiative with Bolivia’s 2025 development plan.

Noting that China and Bolivia are good friends and good brothers, Xi said that bilateral relations have maintained a sound momentum of development in recent years. China supports Bolivia in independently exploring a development path suited to its national conditions and is willing to take the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and Bolivia next year as an opportunity to carry forward the traditional friendship, deepen strategic mutual trust, expand win-win cooperation and lead the China-Bolivia strategic partnership to a new level.

The Chinese leader stressed that the two sides should strengthen exchanges between governments, legislatures and political parties as well as at local level, carry out in-depth exchanges on governance experience, and expand cooperation in infrastructure construction, plateau agriculture, green development and digital economy.

They should also deepen coordination within multilateral mechanisms, including the United Nations and BRICS, to promote unity, self-improvement and common development among Global South countries, he said, adding that China supports the integration of Latin America and stands ready to work with Bolivia to strengthen the building of such mechanisms as the China-CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) Forum.

Hailing the profound and brotherly friendship between Bolivia and China, Arce expressed gratitude to China for helping Bolivia in its fight against COVID-19 and its efforts to promote Bolivia’s economic and social development. China has made remarkable accomplishments in its modernisation process under Xi’s leadership, providing valuable experiences and guidance for the development of Bolivia and other countries, he added.

The following articles were originally published by the Xinhua News Agency.
Xi calls for all-round development of China-Mexico relations in new era

RIO DE JANEIRO, Nov. 18 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Monday that China and Mexico should continue to enhance exchanges, renew friendship, make good use of the highly complementary nature of the two economies, constantly advance practical cooperation and push for all-round development of bilateral relations in the new era.

Xi made the remarks when meeting with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo on the sidelines of the 19th G20 Leaders’ Summit.

Xi once again congratulated Sheinbaum on becoming the first female president in the history of Mexico, and recalled his visit to Mexico in 2013, which he said had left a deep and unforgettable impression.

Highlighting the two countries’ time-honored traditional friendship, Xi said China and Mexico share similar views and ideas on many international issues, and both countries advocate a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization.

China is ready to work with Mexico to uphold multilateralism and international fairness and justice, and inject positive energy into the development of the world economy, Xi added.

Sheinbaum expressed her pleasure in meeting Xi, noting that she fully agrees with Xi’s assessment of the relationship between the two countries. Although Mexico and China are far apart in distance, their ties are very close. Many Chinese companies operate in Mexico, including participating in the construction of major infrastructure projects in Mexico City, she said.

She also expressed her gratitude for China’s generous and sincere assistance during Mexico’s difficult times such as the hurricane disaster, which is testament to the friendship between the two peoples.

Both Mexico and China are committed to upholding multilateralism. Mexico is willing to work with China to explore potential opportunities while further expanding cooperation in various fields, added Sheinbaum.

Xi calls for alignment of Belt and Road Initiative with Bolivia’s 2025 development plan

RIO DE JANEIRO, Nov. 19 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday called on China and Bolivia to align Belt and Road Initiative with Bolivia’s 2025 development plan.

Xi made the remarks when meeting Bolivian President Luis Arce on the sidelines of the G20 Leaders’ Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Noting that China and Bolivia are good friends and good brothers, Xi said that bilateral relations have maintained a sound momentum of development in recent years.

The two sides have firmly supported each other on issues concerning their core interests and major concerns, and Belt and Road construction has yielded fruitful results, bringing tangible benefits to the two peoples, said Xi.

China supports Bolivia in independently exploring a development path suited to its national conditions, and is willing to take the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and Bolivia next year as an opportunity to carry forward the traditional friendship, deepen strategic mutual trust, expand win-win cooperation and lead the China-Bolivia strategic partnership to a new level, he said.

Xi stressed that the two sides should strengthen exchanges between governments, legislatures and political parties as well as at local level, carry out in-depth exchanges on governance experience, and expand cooperation in infrastructure construction, plateau agriculture, green development and digital economy.

The two sides should also deepen coordination within multilateral mechanisms, including the United Nations, BRICS, to promote unity, self-improvement and common development among Global South countries, he said, adding that China supports the integration of Latin America and stands ready to work with Bolivia to strengthen the building of such mechanism as the China-CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) Forum.

Hailing the profound and brotherly friendship between Bolivia and China, Arce expressed gratitude to China for helping Bolivia in its fight against COVID-19 and its efforts to promote Bolivia’s economic and social development.

China has made remarkable accomplishments in its modernization process under Xi’s leadership, providing valuable experiences and guidance for the development of Bolivia and other countries, he added.

Congratulating Xi on the recent opening of the Chancay Port in Peru, Arce noted that Bolivia is willing to jointly celebrate the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations with China next year, further deepen their strategic partnership and strengthen cooperation in such areas as infrastructure connectivity, so as to support Bolivia’s national development and improve the well-being of its people.

Bolivia is ready to enhance cooperation with China in multilateral frameworks such as BRICS and the China-CELAC Forum, he said.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/11/22/x ... dent-arce/

Image

China and Brazil working to shape a just, multipolar world order
In the following article, published in China Daily on 19 November 2024, Efe Can Gürcan describes the history of the G20 and argues that Brazil’s presidency of the organisation – and its leadership of the G20 summit that took place this week – “could produce a pivotal transformation in the G20, placing stronger emphasis on Global South perspectives”.

Efe notes the complemenarities of Brazil and China’s development strategies. For example: “Brazil’s Ecological Transition Plan, which has garnered global attention for its ambitious goals and strongly resonates with China’s shared vision of an ecological civilization.” Meanwhile, China is Brazil’s largest trading partner, and Brazil is China’s principal source of agricultural imports.

On foreign policy issues, “both countries, as BRICS members, share similar positions … including on the Palestine and the Ukraine crises, and both advocate for a multipolar world based on fairness and justice.” As such, “by engaging more closely with China, Brazil could amplify its role in shaping a just, multipolar world order and in bringing the Global South’s voice to the forefront”.

The results of the G20 summit and the bilateral meetings between Presidents Xi Jinping and Lula da Silva certainly support the vision Efe outlines. Xi and Lula announced on Wednesday the elevation of their countries’ bilateral ties to a “community with a shared future for a more just world and a more sustainable planet”, and committed to deepening coordination between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Brazil’s development strategies.

The two “agreed that the relationship is at its best period in history, is growing stronger in global, strategic and long-term significance, and has become an exemplar of common progress, solidarity and cooperation between major developing countries” and that “China and Brazil should also step forward to their historic missions of leading efforts to safeguard the common interests of Global South countries and making the international order more just and equitable”, as reported by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

China and Brazil’s blossoming relationship is based on mutual respect, friendship and solidarity, and a shared determination to struggle against poverty, against war, for sustainable development, and for a multipolar world. This is a relationship that is not only of great benefit to the two countries, but to the world as a whole.

Dr Efe Can Gürcan is currently a Visiting Scholar at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and is a member of the Friends of Socialist China Britain Committee.
With the theme “Building a Just World and a Sustainable Planet”, Brazil’s G20 presidency provides a unique chance to shape the global agenda at a pivotal time. This role is far from ceremonial — unlike organizations with a permanent secretariat or founding charter, the G20 relies on the country holding the presidency to set priorities, coordinate initiatives, and drive forward discussions. This time, Brazil’s leadership will steer this global forum, which represents over 85 percent of the world’s GDP, three-quarters of international trade, and two-thirds of the global population.

The G20’s history is rooted in responses to the crises of Western-led global capitalism. It emerged initially as a meeting of finance ministers in 1999. The G20 was a response to the devastating 1998 Asian financial crisis, which underscored how global economic turbulence could cascade across borders — especially impacting the developing world. Although the concept of a forum like the G20 emerged within Western circles, G7 leaders initially resisted it, preferring smaller, more private summits to maintain focus and control. Yet, the global call for a more inclusive cooperation mechanism grew louder in 2008, when the US-triggered global financial crisis exposed the limits of Western countries’ ability to stabilize markets and respond to crises alone. Holding its first summit of heads of state in 2008, the G20 ultimately evolved into a “crisis steering group”, which convenes the world’s largest economies, including emerging players that can no longer be sidelined in addressing global problems. As such, the G20’s purpose has expanded beyond finance to encompass pressing global issues such as climate change, economic inequality and sustainable development. Brazil, a key actor in Latin America’s historic “Pink Tide”, a leader in South-South cooperation and champion of multipolarity, is positioned to make the G20 more inclusive and effective in addressing these global challenges.

While the G7 — a smaller, more exclusive club of the wealthiest Western nations — was originally conceived to steer global governance, its legitimacy has waned over time. Its elitist composition, reflective of narrow Western interests, has led to criticism that it excludes key emerging economies. The G7’s exclusive nature was further cemented when it expelled Russia following the 2014 Ukraine crisis, reinforcing its status as a Western bloc rather than a truly global coalition aligned with the common destiny of humanity. The G20, on the other hand, includes a broader array of voices, providing a necessary balance and inclusivity in tackling today’s complex, borderless challenges, such as climate change and inequality.

Brazil’s leadership could produce a pivotal transformation in the G20, placing stronger emphasis on Global South perspectives and potentially transforming it from a North-South platform into a more democratic South-North forum. Brazil’s commitment to inclusive, sustainable development has been formalized in Brazil’s Ecological Transition Plan, which has garnered global attention for its ambitious goals and strongly resonates with China’s shared vision of an ecological civilization. In 2023, Brazil generated an impressive 91 percent of its electricity from clean sources, far surpassing global averages and even its own target of 84 percent by 2030. It also reduced Amazon deforestation to a six-year low, making strides in preserving the planet’s largest rainforest.

Beyond environmental leadership, Brazil is advocating for progressive reforms to reduce inequality and increase global governance inclusivity. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has proposed a 2-percent billionaire tax to combat global inequality and will likely renew his call for reforms to the United Nations, pushing for a more effective and representative Security Council, especially in light of recent failures to address urgent global crises, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposals exhibit a striking synergy with China’s Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative.

Meanwhile, Brazil’s continued economic stability and leadership status are closely tied to its relationship with China. China is Brazil’s largest export destination, and from 2007 to 2023, Chinese foreign direct investment in Brazil totaled $73.3 billion, with significant investment in Brazil’s electricity sector, which is crucial given Brazil’s recent energy challenges. China is also one of Brazil’s top agricultural export destinations, vital for an agribusiness sector that makes up almost 25 percent of Brazil’s GDP. President Xi Jinping’s upcoming visit to Brazil during the G20 summit is an opportune moment to further enhance these economic ties and potentially encourage Brazil’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative. Indeed, recent developments ahead of President Xi’s visit, such as Brazil’s offer to allow Shanghai-based satellite manufacturer SpaceSail access to a space base in the northeast of the country, hint at Brazil’s increasing openness to closer cooperation with China. Despite Brazil’s new tariffs imposed on Asian imports of iron, steel and fiber optic cable in October, this gesture toward collaboration shows Brazil’s recognition of China’s strategic importance.

The collaboration potential of the two countries strongly resonates in broader Latin America, where inadequate infrastructure and weak connectivity remain significant obstacles to regional development. The infrastructure gap in Latin America is vast, requiring an estimated $250 billion in investment annually. Brazil, as Latin America’s largest economy, has historically led efforts to promote infrastructure connectivity through the now-defunct Initiative for the Integration of the Regional Infrastructure of South America within the Union of South American Nations. However, sustaining Brazil’s own growth and supporting regional development will require more resources than Brazil currently has due to economic and political challenges that have affected its capacity since the mid-2010s. Chinese cooperation through the BRI could be key in meeting these infrastructure needs. Brazil’s hesitance to formally join the BRI risks stalling not only its infrastructure progress but also its role as a regional leader and its economy’s competitiveness on the global stage.

One cannot but notice a strong synergy between Brazil and China’s foreign policy objectives. Both countries, as BRICS members, share similar positions on major international issues, including the Palestine and the Ukraine crises, and both advocate for a multipolar world based on fairness and justice. This alignment complements Brazil’s G20 agenda, reinforcing its commitment to South-South cooperation and to building a community with a shared future for mankind. By engaging more closely with China, Brazil could amplify its role in shaping a just, multipolar world order and in bringing the Global South’s voice to the forefront.

https://socialistchina.org/2024/11/22/c ... rld-order/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply