Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:17 pm

US Gaza ‘Ceasefire’ Plan Edited by Netanyahu
September 30, 2025

Axios reported that the changes infuriated Arab officials involved in the negotiations, writes Dave DeCamp.


Image
Benjamin Netanyahu, Jared Kushner and U.S. President Donald Trump are seen during their meeting at the King David hotel in Jerusalem in May, 2017. (Kobi Gideon/ Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs/ Flickr/ CC BY-NC 2.0)

By Dave DeCamp
Antiwar.com

The Gaza ceasefire proposal released by the White House on Monday included significant changes that were requested by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Axios reported on Tuesday.

The Times of Israel also reported that Netanyahu was able to secure key changes to the proposal during a meeting on Sunday with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and his top advisor, Jared Kushner. According to Axios, the release of the deal with the changes infuriated Arab officials involved in the negotiations.

At a press conference with Netanyahu, President Trump presented his proposal as something that has been widely accepted by the Arab world, though the deal was significantly different than what the U.S. and a group of Arab and Muslim countries had previously agreed to due to the changes.

The changes were related to two of the most sensitive issues in the negotiations: the disarmament of Hamas and Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza. The new proposal ties Israel’s phased withdrawal from territory to the “demilitarization” of Gaza and the ability of an international force to take over the land.

“[T]he deal was significantly different than what the U.S. and a group of Arab and Muslim countries had previously agreed…”

The proposal also essentially gives Israel and the U.S. a veto over the withdrawal from Gaza by stating the IDF “will withdraw based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarization that will be agreed upon between the IDF, ISF [International Stabilization Force], the guarantors, and the US.”

According to The Times of Israel, the initial proposal approved by the Arab countries simply stated that the IDF “will progressively hand over the Gaza territory that [it] occup[ies].” Even after all conditions are met, the new proposal will allow Israel to occupy a perimeter zone until Gaza is “properly secure from any resurgent terror threat.”

While the language could be interpreted as a requirement for a full Israeli withdrawal, Netanyahu has made clear that he does not see it that way. “Now the whole world, including the Arab and Muslim world, is pressuring Hamas to accept the terms that we created together with Trump, to bring back all the hostages — the living and the dead — while the IDF stays in the Strip,” he said in a video statement on Sunday night.

Hamas’s long-standing position has been that it’s willing to release all remaining Israeli captives in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Hamas has also rejected the idea of disarming until the creation of a Palestinian state or a Palestinian force that could replace its armed wing.

While many details need to be worked out, Trump and Netanyahu have framed the proposal as a final offer that must be accepted or Israel will “finish the job” in Gaza. Trump has also made clear he’s willing to continue backing the genocidal war if an agreement isn’t reached.

“If Hamas rejects the deal, Bibi, you will have our full backing to do what you have to do,” he said on Monday.

Trump said Tuesday he will give Hamas “three or four days” to respond to the proposal. “All of the Arab countries are signed up, the Muslim countries all signed up, Israel’s all signed up. We’re just waiting for Hamas, and Hamas is either going to be doing it or not – and if it’s not, it’s going to be a very sad end,” he said.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/09/30/u ... netanyahu/

******

Global Sumud Flotilla nears Gaza coast as activists brace for Israeli interception

The flotilla’s 'Orange Line' crossing is the same waters where Israeli forces previously illegally seized the Handala and Madleen aid ships

News Desk

SEP 30, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: rtve)

The Global Sumud Flotilla reached 150 nautical miles from Gaza’s coast on 30 September, with activists declaring they are now in Israel’s “kidnapping zone” and warning of possible interception within the next two days.

“As we approach 150 nautical miles distance from Gaza, we enter Israel’s kidnapping zone. Keep all eyes on us and on Gaza in the coming 48 hours. It’s about damn time to break the siege,” activist Roos Ykema said in a video posted on Instagram.

Organizers believe the fleet could arrive in Gaza within three days, depending on speed, weather, and the risk of mechanical breakdowns or Israeli attacks.

They have named the 150-mile line the “Orange Line,” the point where previous aid ships such as the Madleen and Handala were illegally seized by Israeli naval forces earlier this year.

Rights groups are calling for demonstrations outside foreign ministries in case of arrests or assaults on the flotilla.

Italy and Spain have both sent warships to follow the convoy, reportedly to escort the aid fleet safely and guard against Israeli attacks.

Most recently, Turkiye confirmed its navy intervened after one of the ships began leaking, with footage showing frigates assisting the flotilla.

The Turkish Defense Ministry said on X that its vessels were operating “in coordination with relevant institutions” and reaffirmed their commitment to “the protection of humanitarian values and the safety of innocent civilians.”

The Flotilla has called on governments, including Turkiye, Italy, and Spain, to move past symbolic gestures and join the fleet to Gaza’s shores, upholding the right to free passage and ensuring humanitarian access under international law.

However, despite the assistance, calls to action, and pledges of support, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni previously dismissed the mission as “gratuitous, dangerous, irresponsible,” insisting aid could be routed through Cyprus and the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem.

Her proposal echoed Israeli demands that all supplies be unloaded at Ashkelon under its supervision, a condition flotilla organizers rejected as an extension of the blockade rather than a neutral arrangement.

Several of the Sumud Flotilla ships have already come under attack, including two struck by suspected Israeli drones while docked in Tunisia earlier this month.

An online tracker shows the vessels sailing near Egyptian waters and pressing toward Gaza. Despite tensions, activist Kieran Andrieu reported that morale on board “is higher than it’s been in a long time.”

Image

The fleet, carrying activists, journalists, and artists from 44 countries, is the latest attempt to shatter Israel’s siege on Gaza, where famine grips the population, and genocide continues unchallenged.

https://thecradle.co/articles/global-su ... terception

Sinai in the eye of the storm: Egypt's military build-up strains Camp David limits

Israel's war on Gaza and Cairo's bid to pre-empt a forced Palestinian displacement may be pushing Egypt toward redefining sovereignty in Sinai.


A Cradle Correspondent

SEP 30, 2025

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Sinai, once the buffer that kept Egypt–Israel hostilities in check, is fast becoming the front line of a collapsing détente.

The pillars of the “cold peace” that governed the region for nearly half a century are under visible strain. For the first time since the signing of the Camp David Accords in 1979, Cairo is deploying military forces to the peninsula at an unprecedented scale and with advanced capabilities.

Last week Egypt’s State Information Service (SIS) issued a statement explaining that the forces in Sinai “are primarily aimed at securing the Egyptian borders against all threats, including terrorism and smuggling, and in coordination with the parties to the peace treaty, which Egypt is keen to maintain, given that throughout its history it has not violated any treaty or agreement.”

Nevertheless, Tel Aviv views this shift with deep strategic anxiety despite triggering Cairo’s concerns by the ongoing war on Gaza and its implications for Egyptian national security. The Sinai buildup signals a breakdown in trust, a divergence in strategic vision, and the collapse of assumptions that once anchored Washington's most prized regional alliance.

The view from Tel Aviv

Since the start of the war on Gaza, Israeli intelligence and satellite monitoring have tracked abnormal Egyptian troop movements. This is no longer about temporary troop surges permitted in the past under counterterrorism pretexts.

Egypt has moved armored divisions, special forces, advanced air defense systems, and fighter jets into expanded and modernized bases in Sinai – including Zones B and C, which are subject to strict demilitarization under the Camp David treaty.

From Israel’s perspective, this is a dangerous erosion of the treaty’s security annex, which was designed to keep Sinai demilitarized and serve as a strategic buffer. Alarmed, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly appealed to Washington – the treaty’s guarantor – to pressure Cairo to roll back its deployment.

According to Axios, an Israeli official said, “What the Egyptians are doing in Sinai is very serious and we are very concerned.”

Tel Aviv’s anxieties go beyond hardware and headcounts. Analysts at the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) speak of a “gradual shift in the security balance.” After years of joint coordination against ISIS in Sinai – during which Israel exercised flexibility with treaty provisions – Tel Aviv now fears Egypt is using this context to enforce a new status quo.

Former Israeli ambassador to Cairo David Gofrin claims that Israeli escalation in Gaza and Egypt’s fear of refugee influx have pushed Cairo to reinforce its military presence, potentially setting the stage for a lasting shift in the balance of power in Sinai.

Israel has also accused Egypt of constructing underground facilities that may serve as strategic weapons and missile depots. Even if currently empty, Tel Aviv sees them as offensive infrastructure, undermining the very logic of Sinai's demilitarization.

Egypt’s ‘diminished sovereignty’ in Sinai

Egypt dismisses the Israeli allegations outright. Officials describe the military moves as an act of sovereignty and a defensive requirement driven by Israeli policies. Cairo's posture is shaped by two core concerns:

First, to prevent a forced displacement of Palestinians into Egyptian territory. Cairo believes Netanyahu's government seeks to render Gaza uninhabitable and push its almost 2 million residents into Sinai. This scenario – known as “transfer” – is seen in Cairo not only as a national security risk but as the final liquidation of the Palestinian cause and an existential threat to Egypt. President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has repeatedly called this a “red line” Egypt will not allow to be crossed.

Second, to restore Egypt's full sovereignty over Sinai. Former Egyptian officials say the treaty's constraints were born of a specific historical moment. Today, with security threats evolving, they argue the Egyptian military must have full latitude to secure the peninsula.

The recent statement from SIS affirmed that “the presence of the Egyptian Armed Forces in Sinai – or in any part of Egyptian territory – is entirely subject to what the General Command of the Armed Forces deems necessary and required to protect Egypt’s national security.”

This shift suggests a new Egyptian military doctrine, one that reinterprets treaty obligations through the lens of existential threats and strategic autonomy.

Collapse of trust: From cold peace to mutual suspicion

Cairo's anger has been building steadily, driven by years of Israeli provocations and a growing sense that the strategic balance is being undermined. The war on Gaza has merely brought that frustration to the forefront.

The Israeli army's complete takeover of the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza–Egypt border was seen as a direct violation of the treaty and an attempt to assert full Israeli control over Egypt's eastern flank.

Netanyahu and other Israeli officials have repeatedly accused Egypt of enabling weapons transfers to Hamas. Cairo has rejected these as fabrications aimed at deflecting from Israeli failures.

Israel’s obstruction of humanitarian aid into Gaza through the Rafah Crossing, and efforts to blame Egypt, have further strained Cairo’s domestic and international position.

The killing of an Egyptian soldier by Israeli fire in May 2024 sparked public and official outrage, laying bare the volatility on the ground.

Energy leverage and economic friction

The crisis cannot be considered purely military. Energy relations are now a flashpoint. Egypt, gripped by an economic crisis and gas production shortfalls, increasingly depends on Israeli gas to meet domestic needs and to re-export liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe. This interdependence was once seen as a stabilizing factor.

But reports have emerged that Netanyahu threatened to suspend a $35-billion gas deal with Egypt as a pressure tactic. Though unfulfilled, the threat revealed Tel Aviv’s willingness to weaponize energy – sparking concern in Cairo, which seeks to position itself as a regional energy hub.

Cairo's pan-Arab ambition meets Gulf realism

Amid the crisis, President Sisi revived the long-dormant idea of a unified ‘NATO-style’ Arab army during the emergency Arab-Islamic summit hosted by Qatar, following Israel’s strikes targeting a Hamas delegation in Doha. The rejected proposal reflects Egypt’s historical aspiration to resume de facto leadership of the Arab world. But it faces a regional order that has shifted dramatically.

The Persian Gulf’s core states – especially the UAE and Saudi Arabia – no longer see Cairo as the region’s natural leader. They have crafted their own foreign policies, rooted in direct relations with the US but open to the multipolar reality. While Egypt views Israel as the current regional threat, Gulf states remain fixated on Iran as their main strategic rival.

The Abraham Accords have deepened this divide, creating a normalization bloc led by Israel. For Gulf signatories, any anti-Israel military alignment is now politically implausible. Economic factors also constrain Egypt. Persian Gulf analysts increasingly view Cairo as financially fragile and reliant on Gulf aid. This limits its ability to bankroll major military projects or influence regional dynamics.

Sinai’s fault lines

The military build-up in Sinai has thrown Egypt–Israel relations into a period of deep uncertainty. What previously passed for stability has fractured into mutual suspicion and mounting risk. Cairo’s moves reflect a hardened stance – both in response to Tel Aviv’s escalation in Gaza and in pursuit of military sovereignty.

Whether the days ahead lead to recalibration or confrontation hinges on decisions made in Cairo, Tel Aviv, and Washington. There remains space for updated security arrangements brokered through US mediation. Without this, there is a heightened risk of open conflict through broken energy deals, severed coordination, or armed incidents on the border.

These would not necessarily be one-offs. In June 2023, an Egyptian conscript crossed into Israeli territory and killed three soldiers. Egypt said the conscript was pursuing drug smugglers, while Israel claimed it was a premeditated attack. The incident, which ended with the soldier's death, rattled both governments and revealed the fragility of a security arrangement already under strain.

A single misstep, particularly over the refugee question, could trigger a wider clash. The strategic confrontation unfolding in Sinai cuts to the heart of Gaza’s fate and Egypt’s effort to reassert its centrality in a regional order now up for grabs.

https://thecradle.co/articles/sinai-in- ... vid-limits
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Oct 02, 2025 2:46 pm

Israel Is Committing Genocide in the Gaza Strip: The Fortieth Newsletter (2025)

7 October 2025 will mark the second anniversary of Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. At least 66,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza during this time – 30 out of every 1,000 people.

2 October 2025

Image
Sliman Mansour (Palestine), The Sea Is Mine, 2016.

Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

7 October 2025 will mark the second anniversary of Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. The World Health Organisation’s data page on Palestinian casualties, regularly updated using figures from the Palestinian Health Ministry and UN agencies, shows that around 66,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza over the last two years – 30 out of every 1,000 people who were living in Gaza (these numbers, however may be too low, as the ministry has often admitted that it has no capacity to keep up with the flow of death and does not know how many people are buried beneath the tonnes of rubble).

The UN children’s agency, UNICEF, calculates that 50,000 Palestinian children have been killed or injured. As Edouard Beigbeder, UNICEF’s regional director for the Middle East and North Africa and a twenty-year veteran at UNICEF, stated:

These children – lives that should never be reduced to numbers – are now part of a long, harrowing list of unimaginable horrors: the grave violations against children, the blockade of aid, the starvation, the constant forced displacement, and the destruction of hospitals, water systems, schools, and homes. In essence, the destruction of life itself in the Gaza Strip.

Beigbeder’s statement was based on an assessment of the facts over the last two years. Indeed, the year before, Commissioner General of the UN’s Palestine agency (UNRWA) Philippe Lazzarini said that every day, ten children lost one or both legs due to Israel’s bombardment. A few months later, Lisa Doughten of the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs told the UN Security Council that ‘Gaza is home to the largest cohort of child amputees in modern history’. These stories received little to no attention in mainstream media outlets.

Image
Halima Aziz (Palestine), Motherland, 2023.

On 16 September, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory published a seventy-two page report packed with facts that concluded ‘on reasonable grounds’ that the Israeli government, its high officials, and the military had committed and are continuing to commit acts (actus reus) of genocide with the intention of committing these acts (mens rea). This judgment is far more encompassing than the International Court of Justice’s January 2025 finding of ‘plausible’ evidence of genocide. The commission is led by Navi Pillay, a former judge on the South African High Court and at the International Criminal Court who served as UN high commissioner for human rights from 2008 to 2014. She was clear and direct in her press statement following the release of the report: ‘The Commission finds that Israel is responsible for the commission of genocide in Gaza. It is clear that there is an intent to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza through acts that meet the criteria set forth in the Genocide Convention’.

There is no need to argue the case further. These are the strongest words possible.

Image
Mohammed Al-Hawajri (Palestine), Maryam, 2015.

In mid-September, I visited Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, where the mood oscillates between despondency and resilience. At least four generations of Palestinians live in three of Lebanon’s largest Palestinian camps: Ain al-Hilweh, established in Saida in 1948 by the International Committee of the Red Cross or ICRC; Shatila, established in Beirut in 1949 by the ICRC; and Mar Elias, established in Beirut in 1952 by the Congregation of St. Elias.

The Nakba (Catastrophe) generation, who came as children or young adults mostly from what is now northern Israel into Lebanon in 1948.
The second generation of Palestinian refugees, the first to be born in the camps. They formed the core of the armed resistance as the fedayeen (fighters) through various new Palestinian political organisations such as Fatah (founded in 1957), the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (founded in 1964), and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (founded in 1967).
The third generation, born in the 1970s and 1980s, who came of age during the Israeli occupation of Lebanon (1982–2000) and had their political teeth cut in the first Intifada (1987–1993) and the second Intifada (2000–2005). Many of them drifted from the organisations of the previous generation and went into the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (founded in 1981) and Hamas (founded in 1987).
The fourth generation, born in the 1990s and after, who grew up at a time of shrinking opportunities in the camps and with a growing sense of futility and anger.
Four generations have lived in these camps, far from their homes in Palestine, since 1948. They look south and wonder when they will be able to exercise their right to return, a right that was guaranteed in UN Resolution 194 in December 1948.

Whether in the West Bank, Jordan, or Lebanon, the sense of absolute anger and hopelessness in the camps is overwhelming. The Palestinians who live there watch the images coming from Gaza, the absolute destruction and unrelenting genocide. It feels as if they can do nothing. The urge to pick up the gun and fight to defend the people of Gaza is overwhelming but impossible. They feel taunted by the Israelis, whose cold-blooded murder of Palestinian children takes anger to the boiling point. A few of these young people took me aside at Shatila and showed me a viral video of a Chinese professor, Dr. Yan Xuetong of Tsinghua University, arguing with an Israeli military representative, Colonel Elad Shoshan, at the Xiangshan Forum in Beijing in September 2025.

Image
Chinese scholar clashes with Israeli commander in September 2025.


When Colonel Shoshan tried to defend the genocide, Dr. Yan interrupted and said ‘your government has no legitimacy [or] the right to decide or define what is fact’. Dr. Yan cut off Shoshan’s mumbles about terrorism with the direct statement that there is just ‘too much propaganda’, and ‘no one believes it except a few Israelis’. Dr. Yan’s anger pleased the young Palestinians, who saw their own feelings mirrored in his words and conviction. They have no time for splitting hairs. They want the violence to end and Palestine to be free.

Image
Nabil Anani (Palestine), The Palestinian Icon, 2010.

Meanwhile, in Gaza City’s Midan al-Jundi al-Majhool (Square of the Unknown Soldier), the sound of music wafts through the air. Ahmed Abu Amsha, a music teacher at the Edward Said National Conservatory of Music who has been displaced at least twelve times during the genocide, gathers children to form a group called Gaza Birds Singing. Surrounded by the sounds of drones, they took their ambient buzz to build their own harmonies around – the sonic canvas of guitar and singing built around the drone.

Image
Gaza Birds Singing performs Sheel sheel ya Jamali to the sound of drones in August, 2025.

One of their most popular songs is Sheel sheel ya Jamali (Carry, Carry, O My Camel), a familiar Palestinian chant:

Carry, carry, O my camel,
Bear the load in God’s name.
The martyr’s blood is perfumed with cardamom,
O night, give way to dawn.

Woe, woe upon the tyrant,
God’s own judgment will fall.
No shadow can hide the stars of night –
I cry out for him.

We must bring down the tyrant.

Warmly,

Vijay

https://thetricontinental.org/newslette ... niversary/

******

Disarm Jerusalem, Not Gaza
Posted by Internationalist 360° on October 1, 2025
Rima Najjar

Image
This is what sovereignty looks like under a Jewish supremacist regime. Disarm Jerusalem, Not Gaza.

From Corpus Separatum to Settler Sovereignty: A Case for Indictment

Author’s Note: This essay argues that disarmament must begin in Jerusalem — the epicenter of supremacist sovereignty and settler-colonial control — not in Gaza, which remains besieged and starved. It traces the betrayal of the 1947 corpus separatum designation, documents the ongoing erasure of Palestinian civic and cultural life, and indicts the international complicity that sustains it. The essay then outlines four modalities of resistance — armed, legal, international, and cultural — each refusing not only Trump’s plan, but the Jewish supremacist ideology that made it possible. What matters is not diplomatic tone or strategic optics. What matters is the ideological clarity of the rejection.


Opening: It isn’t Gaza that should be disarmed. It’s Jerusalem.

When Western powers — namely the United States, the United Kingdom, and France — through Zionist machinations first tried to impose the 1947 UN Partition Plan on Arab Palestine, Resolution 181 proposed dividing Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem designated as a corpus separatum: a demilitarized city under international administration.

The plan was drafted not in consultation with Palestinians, but in defiance of their overwhelming rejection. It was engineered by colonial powers who had already failed to protect Jewish refugees in Europe and now sought to offload their moral debts onto Palestine. The architects — Harry S. Truman, Ernest Bevin, and Georges Bidault — must have had an inkling that Zionist exclusive sovereignty over Jerusalem would turn it into a flashpoint of settler-colonial expansion and Jewish supremacy. As it turned out, they were right.

After occupying East Jerusalem in 1967, Israel moved quickly to erase Palestinian political and civic presence. It dissolved the elected Palestinian municipal council, deported officials like Mayor Rawhi al-Khatib, and replaced local governance with Israeli administrative control.

And the takeover didn’t stop at bureaucracy.

Israel began systematically expelling Palestinian residents, revoking their residency rights under arbitrary criteria, and denying family reunification. Entire neighborhoods — Silwan, Sheikh Jarrah — were targeted for Jewish immigrant settler expansion, with homes demolished under the pretext of lacking permits Palestinians were never allowed to obtain.

This is not a closed chapter. It is ongoing. The complicity is not historical — it is active.

Israeli authorities erase municipal records from East Jerusalem’s city hall, confiscate keys at checkpoints, and deny recognition of Palestinian property deeds in court.

Israeli maps rename streets, erase neighborhoods, and redraw boundaries to fabricate permanence. But cartography is not sovereignty. It is a tool of it — and it can be refused.

The U.S. Embassy move to Jerusalem, the Abraham Accords, and the EU’s silence on residency revocations all signal endorsement.

Corporations like Caterpillar and Hyundai supply the machinery of demolition.
UNESCO’s designation of Jerusalem as “shared heritage” is undermined by its failure to protect Palestinian access.

Furthermore, Israel weaponizes access to holy sites: Muslim worshippers face military checkpoints and age restrictions at Al-Aqsa, while Christian Palestinians are routinely denied permits to visit holy sites in Bethlehem and Jerusalem. Surveillance, land confiscation, and settler violence are daily tools of control.

The goal is to Judaize Judaize the city, to erase its Palestinian character, and to make indigenous life untenable — going to the extreme of digging tunnels beneath Haram al-Sharif in pursuit of a mythical Jewish temple.

Jerusalem was meant to be protected from sovereignty — not subjected to its supremacist execution.

So, let us be clear.

If disarmament is to mean anything, it must begin with the city where the settler-colonial Jewish supremacist regime is headquartered.

If disarmament is to mean anything, it must begin with the city that was meant to be protected from Zionist sovereignty, not the one besieged and crushed by it.


Resistance Is Vital and It Continues in Many Forms

• Armed Resistance

Intensified not as escalation but as insistence: we will not be erased.

In Gaza, the Al-Qassam Brigades and Palestinian Islamic Jihad continued operations despite catastrophic losses, framing their actions as existential defense rather than tactical aggression. In Khan Yunis, new formations like the Counterterrorism Strike Force (CSF) emerged, declaring their intent to resist both Hamas repression and Israeli occupation.

Tribal militias such as those led by Husam al-Astal and Yasser Abu Shabab — though controversial — signaled a fracturing of control and a refusal to accept externally imposed governance models. The Resistance Committees, led by Ayman Al-Shishniya, rejected the Trump administration’s postwar plan as a “recycling of the Deal of the Century,” warning that international blessings for the plan amounted to complicity in genocide and ethnic cleansing.

• Legal and Diplomatic Resistance

Sharpened its indictments: naming genocide, naming apartheid, naming complicity.

In September 2025, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, citing four of the five acts defined by the Genocide Convention — including deliberate starvation, destruction of infrastructure, and targeting of children.

Amnesty International echoed this, calling for an end to the “political economy enabling genocide,” and naming corporations complicit in the supply chain of destruction — from Boeing and Lockheed Martin to Elbit Systems and Palantir.

Legal scholars and human rights bodies convened in forums like the Jurists for Palestine webinar to explore peacekeeping mechanisms and civilian protection strategies, emphasizing the need for third-state accountability and international criminal prosecution.

• International Solidarity

Fractured and reformed, with students, workers, and artists declaring: we will not be neutral.

On September 22, 2025, nearly one million people across Italy staged a general strike in support of Palestine, shutting down ports, train stations, and major junctions under the slogan “Blocchiamo Tutto” (“Let’s block everything”).

In Berlin, artists projected images of Gaza’s destruction onto embassy walls, while in Beirut, refugee-led collectives organized teach-ins and cultural vigils.

Education International issued a global call for solidarity with Palestinian teachers and students, condemning the destruction of every higher education institution in Gaza and the killing of over 10,000 children.

And in the Mediterranean, the Global Sumud Flotilla — a civilian-led fleet of over 40 vessels carrying 500 activists from more than 40 countries — set sail to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza.

Despite drone attacks off the coast of Greece and aggressive interception by Israeli warships near Gaza’s exclusion zone, the flotilla pressed forward, broadcasting live footage and refusing to turn back.

Among those aboard were climate activist Greta Thunberg, South African MP Mandla Mandela, and French-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan.

Their mission was not symbolic. It was juridical: to deliver humanitarian aid and to indict the blockade as a tool of starvation and siege.

“We sail on undeterred by Israeli threats and tactics of intimidation,” the flotilla declared.
“The humanitarian demand to break the blockade cannot be walked back to port.”

• Cultural Resistance

Surged — poets, illustrators, archivists, meme-makers — each refusing the terms of the plan by refusing its grammar.

Artists like Lina Abojaradeh used murals, comics, and poetry to evoke radical empathy and defiance, declaring that “art gives us a space to stop. To feel. To recognize the humanity in the people suffering.”

The deaths of cultural figures like Heba Abu Naha and Refaat Alareer — whose poem “If I Must Die” became a global rallying cry — marked not just personal loss but cultural devastation.

Visual artists such as Sliman Mansour and Abdul Hay Mosallam Zarara continued to be cited as foundational voices in the aesthetics of resistance, their works circulating in protests, classrooms, and digital archives.

Among the most incisive voices in cultural resistance is Palestinian cartoonist Mohammad Sabaaneh, whose stark black-and-white illustrations refuse euphemism and demand indictment. His work refuses to normalize ethnic cleansing.

What Matters Is the Ideological Clarity of the Rejection of Trump’s Plan

We should not have been shocked at Trump’s plan, but we were — because even those of us who have spent decades witnessing and recording Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians — of annexation, of demographic engineering, of mass incarcerations, of checkpoints, of house demolitions, of land confiscation, of settler rapaciousness — still feel the sting when the mask slips entirely.

Our grief is the grief of recognition.

The ache of seeing what we already witnessed and knew, now stripped of pretense and doublespeak — the genocide in Gaza, the mass displacement, the starvation, the targeting of journalists, hospitals, schools, cemeteries.

Trump’s plan is a declaration that the machinery of erasure no longer requires euphemism.

And so, after the shock and grief, we mobilized again to reject. To refuse. To clarify.

From Gaza, from the camps, from the diaspora, from the streets of Ramallah and the refugee corridors of Berlin and Beirut, came a chorus — not of surprise, but of refusal.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/10/ ... -not-gaza/

*****

Israeli Forces Spark Global Outrage by Intercepting Sumud Flotilla Off Gaza Coast
Posted on October 2, 2025 by Yves Smith

Yves here. This article gives some insight into the stat of play with the Israel boarding of ships in the Sumud Gaza relief effort, but is light on what happens next. Israel says the individuals they captured will be prosecuted in Israeli courts. At a minimum, that means beaten up in Israel gaols. They are being accused of being Hamas collaborators and can be expected to receive the sort of rough handling that has been repeatedly decried by human rights group. For instance, from the BBC in Blindfolded, bound and beaten: Palestinians tell of Israeli jail abuse:

Israel’s leading human rights organisation says conditions inside Israeli prisons holding Palestinian detainees amount to torture.

B’tselem’s report entitled “Welcome to Hell”, contains testimony from 55 recently released Palestinian detainees, whose graphic testimony points to a dramatic worsening of conditions inside prisons since the start of the Gaza war 10 months ago.

It’s the latest in a series of reports, including one last week by the UN, which contain shocking allegations of abuse directed against Palestinian prisoners.

B’tselem says the testimony their researchers have gathered is remarkably consistent.

“All of them again and again, told us the same thing,” says Yuli Novak, B’tselem’s executive director.

“Ongoing abuse, daily violence, physical violence and mental violence, humiliation, sleep deprivation, people are starved.”


The mere interception of these ships is sparking protests in Europe. When word gets out of abuse of citizens of these countries, expect the BDS movement and port worker embargoes on loading and servicing vessels going to and from Israel to increase greatly.

Conor had warned that Meloni was facing a public revolt if she (as expected) capitulated to US pressure and pulled by the Italian navy vessel that had been one of the escorts of the Sumud flotilla.

🇮🇹 Italy is on the verge of a general strike.
Image
— 𝓙𝓲𝓶𝓶𝔂 𝓙 🫒🗝️🇵🇸 (@JimmyJ4thewin) October 1, 2025


Italy's largest union, with over 5.5 million workers, has called a general strike for Friday in solidarity with the Global Sumud Flotilla.

And smaller Italian unions have said they will join CGIL's general strike.

— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) October 1, 2025


And fresh from DJG, Reality Czar:

Herebelow, I attach a screen shot from the latest e-blast from Arci (the association founded by the commies that is an umbrella for associations, cultural institutions, leisure activities, and student groups). The Karma is the boat sponsored by Arci.

Here in Torino, there already were demonstrations last night. I received a notice of a demo for 18,00 (6:00 p.m.) today, and I will try to get to the Piazza Castello to check on it.

Tomorrow, the CGIL, the main union (also founded by commies!) has called for people to muster at 9:00 a.m. There are other demos called for 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.

More info later, as things develop.


And as Conor Gallagher undoubtedly knows, being so astute about Italy, poor little Giorgia Meloni has already made some self-defeating, self-pitying statements. Not that such rhetorical slop has much effect — either way — these days.

Image

By Stephen Prager and Jessica Corbett, staff writers at Common Dreams. Originally published at Common Dreams

This is a developing story… Please check back for updates…

Israel intercepted multiple boats from the Global Sumud Flotilla seeking to bring humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip late Wednesday, generating outrage and displays of solidarity from across the globe.

“History will side with the flotilla,” said former UK Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn, who remains in Parliament. “And their bravery will only inspire more people to join our global movement for Palestine.”

Turkey’s foreign ministry described the interception as a “terrorist act… which targeted civilians acting peacefully,” while Colombian President Gustavo Petro booted the entire Israeli diplomatic delegation from his country immediately following the news.

In Barcelona, hundreds of outraged protesters gathered outside the Israeli consulate. Similar scenes broke out in other cities around the world, including Istanbul and Brussels.

BREAKING: Massive demonstration in Brussels this evening in defense of the Global Sumud Flotilla, which has begun to be intercepted by Israeli boats

After Place Bourse, the demonstration is heading towards the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. pic.twitter.com/uEzDfLsYz6

— Muhammad Yasir (@YasirHajana) October 1, 2025



The Guardian reported that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) boarded at least two vessels roughly 75 miles away from Gaza. A livestream from the flotilla showed signals from boat after boat going dark after the convoy was surrounded by over 20 Israeli naval ships.

According to Drop Site News—whose editor Alex Colston has been reporting from one of the vessels—by midnight local time, at least six boats from the flotilla had been intercepted and boarded by the IDF.

After midnight, one sailor shared on the livestream that Israeli ships were spraying the flotilla boats with water cannons. By 1:00 am, the stream only showed the Meteque, where sailors held their hands above their heads as the IDF ordered them to stop their engine.


Sailors on the Meteque, a boat with the Global Sumud Flotilla, held their hands above their heads as Israeli forces ordered them to stop their engine off the Gaza coast at around 1:00 am local time on October 2, 2025. (Photo: screenshot/Global Sumud Flotilla/YoutTube)

An earlier video from flotilla activists shows the moment that Brazilian organizer Thiago Ávila received a message from an IDF soldier who ordered the flotilla to turn around.

“You are entering an active war zone,” the soldier is heard saying over an intercom. “If you attempt to breach the naval blockade, we will stop your vessel and act to confiscate it through legal proceedings in court.”

In response, Ávila pointed to the International Court of Justice’s provisional measures on Gaza and the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Ávila asked Israeli forces to “stand down,” “not commit another war crime,” and “not engage with our peaceful, nonviolent, humanitarian solidarity mission for the Palestinian people in Gaza.”

Thiago Avila, member of the Global Sumud Flotilla, puts an IOF soldier in their spot as they tell them to turn around pic.twitter.com/RFG1aZW5XU

— Global Sumud Flotilla Commentary (@GlobalSumudF) October 1, 2025

In a courageous display, participants of the Global Sumud Flotilla chants in support of Palestine in defiance of the Israeli naval ships. pic.twitter.com/43CC1NmCun

— Fadi Daoud (@fjadaoud) October 1, 2025


The flotilla’s more than 40 civilian boats are carrying hundreds of humanitarians, journalists, and other noteworthy figures from dozens of countries around the world. They include the late South African President Nelson Mandela’s grandson, Mandla Mandela; American actress Susan Sarandon; former Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau; and multiple other European politicians.

Another video shows one of the flotilla’s most famous participants, 22-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, being detained by an IDF soldier.

The Israeli Navy has arrested Greta Thunberg aboard the Sumud aid flotilla. pic.twitter.com/kkwYcpgGw9

— Séamus Malekafzali (@Seamus_Malek) October 1, 2025


The flotilla set sail from Barcelona a few weeks ago, in response to Israel’s illegal near-total blockade of humanitarian aid entering Gaza, which has resulted in mass starvation. A group of United Nations experts warned in early September that any attempt by Israel to stop the vessels from delivering aid “would constitute a grave violation of international law and humanitarian principles.”

Throughout their journey toward Gaza, the flotilla members have faced numerous threats from the Israeli government, which has attempted to smear the humanitarian mission as an effort to advance the agenda of Hamas.

Last week, while still off the coast of Greece, the flotilla was swarmed with drones and attacked with flash-bang grenades believed to have been launched by Israel, which has a history of targeting such missions. That attack initially led the governments of Italy and Spain to send naval ships to offer protection to the flotilla, but they have since turned back as the boats moved closer to Gaza.

Israel’s actions against the Global Sumud Flotilla follow its interception of multiple Gaza-bound Freedom Flotilla Coalition boats earlier this year. Edward Ahmed Mitchell, deputy executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Wednesday that “once again, the Israeli occupation has demonstrated that it will kidnap humanitarian activists and engage in piracy in international waters, all to maintain its lawless blockade of the Palestinian people.”

“Every nation that pays lip service to international law should condemn this illegal attack on the Global Sumud Flotilla and take their own steps to forcibly break the siege of Gaza,” he argued. “In the case of Western nations that continue to enable Israel’s genocide even as their own citizens risk life and limb to stop it, anti-Palestinian racism and the influence of anti-Palestinian lobby groups clearly explains their ongoing complicity.”

“We applaud the participants in the flotilla for their courage,” he added, “we demand their immediate release, and we urge the international community, including Western, Arab, and Muslim nations, to take action against the Israeli occupation for its crimes.“”

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10 ... coast.html

*****

‘Stunning Reversal’: NYT Poll Finds Sinking US Support for Israel
September 30, 2025

A survey of 1,313 registered voters found that for the first time more respondents said they support Palestinians than Israelis, reports Julia Conley.

Image
Child and others wounded in Israeli attack on Gaza, 2023. (Fars photo, Ghassan Salem, CC BY 4.0)

By Julia Conley
Common Dreams

As Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and starvation policy in the exclave nears the beginning of its third year, the assault that has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians has driven U.S. support for Israel “off a cliff,” suggested one commentator in response to a poll released by The New York Times and Siena College.

The survey of 1,313 registered voters found that for the first time since the newspaper and university have polled Americans on their sympathies regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1998, more respondents said they support Palestinians than Israelis.

“The survey of 1,313 registered voters found that for the first time … more respondents said they support Palestinians than Israelis.”

Thirty-five percent expressed sympathy with the Palestinian side, while 34 percent said they support Israelis and 31 percent said they were unsure or had equal sympathy for both sides.

The poll did not show a majority of respondents backing Palestinians, who have demanded the right to self-determination and an end to Israel’s occupation and apartheid policies since Zionist forces ethnically cleansed hundreds of Palestinian towns and cities, killed 15,000 people, and expelled at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homes in order to establish the Jewish-majority state of Israel in the 1940s.

But the shift in support toward Palestinians was still viewed as seismic among political observers including journalist Krystal Ball, who said the poll showed that “Israel has lost the American people.”

Support for Israel and the United States’ policy of providing the country with more than $300 billion in aid — mostly military aid — since its founding have long appeared unbreakable among lawmakers from both major political parties, and the public has followed suit for decades.

In 2011, a Gallup poll found that U.S. adults were more than four times as likely to express sympathy and support for Israelis than for Palestinians. Between 1988 and 2011, the survey never found more than 20 percent of Americans siding with Palestinians.

The Times/Siena poll has found similar results, with 47 percent of respondents telling survey-takers that they supported Israel in the aftermath of the Hamas-led attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, and just 20 percent expressing sympathy with Palestinians.

Image
End Aid to Israel demonstration in Washington on Nov. 4, 2023, during the Israeli assault on Gaza. (Consortium News)

In December 2023, only 22 percent of Americans told the Times and Siena they believed Israel was intentionally killing Palestinian civilians — despite numerous statements by Israeli officials suggesting that their policy was to do so.

In the first weeks of the war, then-Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said the government as cutting off deliveries of water, food, and fuel to Gaza because Israel was “fighting human animals,” and President Isaac Herzog said Gaza’s population of more than 2 million Palestinians were all “responsible” for the Hamas attack, denying that there were civilians who were “not involved.”

Nearly two years later, Americans have changed their view, with 40 percent saying Israel is intentionally killing Palestinians. A quarter of respondents said Israel is doing enough to prevent civilian casualties, down from 30 percent in 2023, and 16 percent said Israel is unintentionally killing civilians, down from 21 percent.

“Americans have changed their view, with 40 percent saying Israel is intentionally killing Palestinians.”

The Times reported a “stunning reversal” in public opinion regarding the continuation of U.S. aid to Israel since October 2023. More than half of registered voters now oppose providing Israel with military and economic aid.

Opposition was the highest among voters under the age of 44; 62 percent of those aged 30-44 said the U.S. should stop funding Israel, while 68 percent of voters aged 18-29 said the same.

Last month, a Quinnipiac University survey showed similar results, with 60 percent of voters from across the political spectrum saying they opposed more military aid for Israel — the most significant opposition level recorded by the university since it first asked the question in November 2023.

The Times survey displayed “absolutely staggering public opinion polling on Israel’s collapse among young Americans,” said journalist Glenn Greenwald.

“More than half of registered voters now oppose providing Israel with military and economic aid.”

“Though this was utterly unthinkable even five years ago,” said Greenwald, “it’s now reflected in poll after poll, and is so entrenched it’s hard to imagine it can be reversed.”

The poll was released Monday as progressive commentator Hasan Piker said in a video posted on social media by Current Affairs that Democratic lawmakers must abandon the idea that supporting Israel is “pragmatic,” pointing out that New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani easily won the primary election in June after being outspoken in his criticism of Israel’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territories.

“It’s not an area that you will be punished for, no matter how fearful you are of corporate donors, no matter how fearful you are of lobbying interests,” said Piker. “The people will back you, as we have seen with the primary victory for Zohran.”

Continuing to support Israel is “not pragmatic,” he added. “It’s actually the opposite of pragmatism.”

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/09/30/s ... or-israel/

*****

Hamas slams Israeli interception of Global Sumud Flotilla as 'piracy, terrorism'

Israel has boarded nearly all of the flotilla’s 47 boats, and has detained hundreds of activists

News Desk

OCT 2, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AA)

Hamas slammed the Israeli military’s interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla, which is carrying aid for Gaza, in a statement released on 2 October.

The statement called the interception “a treacherous attack and a crime of piracy and maritime terrorism against civilians.”

“It is a barbaric assault targeting international solidarity activists who were on an urgent humanitarian mission to deliver emergency aid to our besieged people in the Gaza Strip, who have been subjected for two years to genocide and systematic starvation,” Hamas added.

It also saluted “the courage of the free activists” and called on the UN and international community to hold Israel “accountable.”

Israeli naval forces moved to intercept the flotilla overnight as the boats were approaching the besieged strip.

Around 40 of the flotilla’s 47 boats have been boarded by Israeli forces so far. Hundreds of activists have been detained, including Swedish activist Greta Thunburg – who was detained and deported during the interception of a previous aid boat earlier this year. “The passengers are safe and in good health,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry said on Thursday morning.

Already several vessels of the Hamas-Sumud flotilla have been safely stopped and their passengers are being transferred to an Israeli port.
Greta and her friends are safe and healthy. pic.twitter.com/PA1ezier9s

— Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) October 1, 2025
At least four boats are stuck at sea due to technical issues. Israel will either detain the activists on board or tow the boats to shore.

Irish activist Tadhg Hickey is among those who sailed to Gaza on the Sumud Flotilla, as well as French politician Marie Mesmeur and French-Palestinian European Parliament member Rima Hassan, who has also previously been detained for attempting to break the siege.

Overnight and this morning, the Israeli Navy continued to intercept the large flotilla attempting to break the Israeli maritime blockade on the Gaza Strip.

Forces of the Shayetet 13 naval commando unit have boarded around 40 of the Global Sumud Flotilla's 47 boats, detaining… pic.twitter.com/udlSUmeWXA

— Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian (@manniefabian) October 2, 2025
Spain announced on 2 October that it summoned its Israeli envoy in response to the interception, adding that 65 Spanish citizens were aboard the flotilla.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry called the interception “an act of terrorism that constitutes the most serious violation of international law and endangers the lives of innocent civilians.”

“We are very concerned about the situation with the Sumud Flotilla, we are in touch with the families of a number of British nationals involved,” the UK government said.

The Global Sumud Flotilla departed from Spain one month ago. As it got closer to Gaza on 1 October, Israeli warships harassed the flotilla in a bid to force it to change course. Last month, several of the flotilla's boats were subjected to drone attacks.

On 30 September, Tel Aviv accused the Global Sumud Flotilla of having ties to Hamas.

In a statement, the Israeli Foreign Ministry claimed troops found Hamas documents in Gaza which show a “direct link between the flotilla leaders and the Hamas terrorist organization.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-sla ... -terrorism

amas seeking 'international guarantees' for Gaza ceasefire amid Trump threats: Report

Israel's Defense Minister said it is the 'last opportunity' for Palestinians to flee Gaza City as the army's ethnic cleansing campaign intensifies

News Desk

OCT 1, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

Hamas is examining the ceasefire plan proposed by US President Donald Trump and wishes to amend several points in it, AFP reported on 1 October, citing a Palestinian source close to the resistance movement.

Trump's 20-point plan calls for a ceasefire, the release of Israelis held captive within 72 hours in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and detainees, Hamas's disarmament, the deportation of the movement's leaders, and a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

A Palestinian source close to the Hamas leadership stated that "no final decision" had been made and that "the movement will likely need two to three days," AFP wrote.

"Hamas wants to amend some of the items, such as the disarmament clause and the expulsion of Hamas," the source said.

Hamas is also asking for "international guarantees" for a complete Israeli withdrawal from the strip and guarantees that Israel would not violate a ceasefire.

Trump told reporters on Tuesday that Hamas had "about three or four days" to accept his 20-point Gaza plan, warning the resistance movement it would "pay in hell" if it refused.

Meanwhile, Defense Minister Israel Katz asserted Wednesday that the Israeli military is close to encircling Gaza City and that Palestinians have a "last opportunity" to flee their homes.

"This will tighten the encirclement around Gaza City and everyone leaving it to the south will be forced to pass through IDF checkpoints," said Katz in a press release.

"This is the last opportunity for Gaza residents who wish to do so to move south and leave Hamas terrorists isolated in Gaza City, in the face of IDF activity that continues with full force."

Civilians remaining in Gaza City will be considered "terrorists and supporters of terror," by invading Israeli forces, Katz confirmed.

Israel continues to kill dozens of civilians across Gaza daily. The enclave's civil defense agency said Israeli strikes killed at least 46 people on Wednesday, including 36 in Gaza City.

A strike on a school sheltering displaced Palestinian families killed eight people.

Fadel al-Jadba, 26, told AFP he would defy Katz's threats and remain in his home in Gaza City.

"We want a ceasefire at any cost because we are frustrated, exhausted, and find no one in the world standing with us," he told the French news agency.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-see ... ats-report
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Oct 03, 2025 1:55 pm

Israel declares 600,000 in Gaza City 'military targets,' cuts off lifeline from south

Israeli tanks cut northward travel on the Rashid Road, tightening the siege on Gaza City and intensifying pressure for Palestinians to leave their homes

News Desk

OCT 2, 2025

Image

At least 600,000 Palestinians are currently under siege in Gaza City amid the Israeli army's ongoing bombardment, encirclement, and expulsion campaign, the New Arab reported on 2 October.

On Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced that all Palestinians remaining in the city must abandon their homes, pass Israeli checkpoints, and move to tent encampments in the south, stressing that anyone who stays will be considered a “terrorist” or “terrorist supporter” and targeted by invading Israeli forces.

Now is the “last opportunity for Gaza residents” to move south, Katz said.

Israeli forces have currently blocked all travel northward on the Rashid coastal road, cutting off the city's last surviving lifeline for humanitarian aid and preventing Palestinians who had moved south temporarily in search of food and shelter from returning.

“The only safe road for bringing in food and medicine has been cut. Announcements and speeches mean nothing if aid cannot reach civilians,” stated Mahmoud Basal, the spokesperson of the Gaza civil defense, in a press statement.

While the Israeli military expected a mass exodus to the south, between 600,000 and 700,000 Palestinians remain in Gaza City, the UN estimated.

Those remaining are either unwilling or unable to leave their homes.

“We are not leaving. Yesterday, a drone dropped grenades on the rooftop of our building, but we are not leaving,” said 24-year-old Hani while speaking to Reuters.

“We are afraid that if we leave, we will never see Gaza City again.”

The closure of Rashid Street to northward travel is part of an effort to cleanse the northern strip, according to Ramallah-based political analyst Hani al-Masri.

“Turning the road into a one-way corridor south is a tool of collective pressure, a strategy to forcibly reshape Gaza's population,” Masri told the New Arab.

Al Jazeera correspondent Hani Mahmoud reported Thursday that the Israeli military was creating “mayhem and panic” by ordering people to leave their homes, but then pursuing them on the Rashid Road south with helicopters, drones, and tanks.

“A big part of the reason that people are not now leaving Gaza City is because of the fear and the intimidation created by the Israeli military,” he said.

Al-Akhbar reported on Thursday that Israeli warplanes carried out dozens of strikes on Gaza City, including in the neighborhoods of Al-Nasr, Sheikh Radwan, and Al-Shati in the city's northwest, as well as Al-Daraj, Al-Tuffah, and Al-Nafaq in the northeast, and Al-Sabra in the south.

Gaza's Health Ministry continues to record an average of 100 Palestinians killed per day, Al-Akhbar added, not including the dozens missing whose bodies rescuers are not able to retrieve due to Israeli fire.

One strike on Wednesday killed the son of Gaza's civil defense commander and injured several other rescue officers.

Meanwhile, the Quds Brigades of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) reported a major operation against an Israeli infantry unit in the Al-Nasr neighborhood. Resistance fighters detonated a booby-trapped house packed with improvised explosive devices as soldiers entered to destroy it.

According to health sources in Gaza, Israel has killed at least 66,225 Palestinians and injured 168,938 more since launching the genocide nearly two years ago, in October 2023. However, reputable studies have estimated the death toll in Gaza to be at least 100,000.

In one shocking case earlier this week, an Israeli drone opened fire through a window to shoot a Palestinian nurse in the head as he worked inside the Nasser Hospital in the southern city of Khan Yunis.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-de ... from-south

PFLP calls urgent meeting to devise ‘unified Palestinian stance’ on Trump’s Gaza plan

Hamas has several reservations about the plan and has told mediators it needs more time to review it

News Desk

OCT 2, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AFP via Getty Images)

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) released a statement on 2 October calling for an urgent meeting aimed at reaching a unified Palestinian stance on the 20-point Gaza “peace plan” announced by US President Donald Trump.

“The top priority at this stage is to halt the holocaust being inflicted on the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip, who have made and continue to make enormous sacrifices in defense of their land and identity and in loyalty to their national cause,” the PFLP stated.

“The Palestinian people face a historic responsibility that calls for a swift and unified stance from all national forces,” it added.

The PFLP said it was consulting with several Palestinian factions on the idea of holding an urgent national meeting.

The meeting would aim to issue “a collective and unified position, avoiding individualism or evasion of national responsibility.”

The resistance movement also called for a joint Palestinian, Arab, and international effort to stop the genocidal war.

It said there was a “necessity to reach a unified position on the American proposal, and the political and existential risks contained in some of its provisions, which could be exploited to reshape the situation at the expense of established national rights.”

The plan calls for an immediate halt to the fighting in Gaza and the release of all Israeli captives, dead and alive, within 72 hours.

In response, Israel will free 250 prisoners serving life sentences, along with 1,700 Palestinians from Gaza detained after 7 October.

It also envisions an Israeli withdrawal toward the perimeters of Gaza, which Tel Aviv has rejected.

Hamas is currently reviewing the plan and is not expected to officially respond for another few days.

“Hamas is keen to end the war and end the genocide and it will respond in the way that serves the higher interests of the Palestinian people,” a Palestinian source told Reuters on Wednesday, but warned that the proposal “is a Netanyahu plan articulated by Trump.”

“Accepting the plan is a disaster, rejecting it is another, there are only bitter choices here,” the source added.

Hamas is asking for more time to review the plan, sources told the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

The resistance movement also told mediators about its reservations to parts of the plan, including “the stipulation that it disarm and destroy its weapons,” as well as the demand that it release all captives within 72 hours – which “would be difficult.”

Hamas has “lost contact in recent weeks with some other militant groups holding a number of them,” the sources added.

Hamas officials met with mediators in Doha this week and argued that “Trump’s plan leaves Palestinians without a credible path to statehood and includes several loopholes that would permit Israel to resume the war.”

The plan allows Israeli forces to maintain a “perimeter presence” near Gaza. Yet Tel Aviv has vowed not to withdraw at all. It also envisions a path toward Palestinian statehood, which Israel categorically opposes.

The plan does not clarify the sequencing of steps beyond the initial ceasefire and prisoner release, and crucial questions, such as who funds the rebuilding, who enforces disarmament, how aid will be distributed in practice, and where displaced Palestinians live during reconstruction, all remain unanswered.

“If Hamas refuses [the proposal], [US President Donald] Trump will give Israel full backing to complete the military operation and eliminate them,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on 30 September.

Trump said on the same day that Hamas has three to four days to respond, otherwise it faces a “bleak fate.”

Qatar, Egypt, and Turkiye are reportedly pressing Hamas to accept. According to Axios, Doha informed Hamas that it cannot secure a better deal for them.

https://thecradle.co/articles/pflp-call ... -gaza-plan

*****

Board of Peace offer by dogs of war: Trump’s Gaza deal unveiled

Martin Jay

October 3, 2025

Trump’s plan casts a shadow over the UN’s one and any whining by craven EU leaders who want to pretend to be in support for a Palestinian state.

The waiting is agonizing as it is prolonged. The Trump deal offered finally to Hamas is on the table for them to examine, but in reality what are the chances of Hamas accepting any of it? Were they expected to?

The deal itself in the paper is vague in many areas as the proposal itself looks as though it was cobbled together at the last minute. Many would argue that it is not a peace deal as such but more a blueprint to simply restore the sanctity and credibility of the negotiations – after Israel bombed Qatar very recently in its quest to kill those who is it supposedly negotiating with: Hamas.

Other would argue that it is a bold step in the right direction and that a ceasefire could come about and the Israeli hostages could be freed.

Yet there is too much blue sky thinking involved for anyone hoping that anything positive can come out of the offer that Trump has made which places him as the remote President in waiting of the Gaza Strip with Tony Blair as the caretaker Prime Minister.

So much has yet to be finalised. How could Hamas possibly accept any of the terms – the most polemic being that it gives up its arms? A number of leading analysts in the region are beginning to suspect that those who wrote this deal know only too well that Hamas can’t and so this begs the question what is the real purpose of it in the first place?

It’s no secret that Trump was caught off guard by UK, Canada and Australia all announcing their support of a Palestinian state but he was also fazed by how quickly the UN itself came up with its own proposal of a road made to self-governance. And so, Trump moved very quickly to paste together a plan which would cast a shadow over the UN’s one and any whining by craven EU leaders who want to pretend to be in support for a Palestinian state.

The important point is to keep Netanyahu happy, to keep the genocide going while Trump can claim that it is all the fault of Hamas that the killing continues. The truth is that the Trump proposal is not at all serious and should be regarded in a much more cynical light for what it really is: a smokescreen. Some even go further though and say it is a way of ensuring that a war in Gaza can actually go on for ever and that a Palestinian state would be blocked if the Trump proposal was adopted.

“Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza is a poisoned chalice: while appearing to offer hope for a ceasefire and surge in aid, it surreptitiously provides Israel with a blank check for waging forever war in Gaza with US and Arab approval” argues Senior Fellow for Middle East Policy at International Institute for Strategic Studies Hassan T Alhasan recently on CNN.

“The American-Israeli plan is clearly designed to be rejected by Hamas. Its provisions are so vague that it is already being interpreted by Netanyahu as allowing for open-ended Israeli military presence in Gaza with the freedom to conduct military operations under the pretext of fighting Hamas”.

Yet the real red flag to the whole world that this offer by Trump is a loaded one is not by the vague wording of the text which favours Israel, nor by what is left out of the brief document (like Palestinian statehood), but rather the manner in which this blueprint has been presented.

Israel, supported by Trump, carries out the most heinous genocide in modern history against the poorest, most vulnerable people – if not bombing women and children in their tents then attempting to starve them to death – but then suddenly has a spasmodic pang of democratic zeal and thinks that it needs to offer Hamas a deal in writing?

Surely if Trump was serious about the offer, he and Netanyahu would simply go ahead and impose it. The real reason why it has been offered, is that both these genocidal maniacs need Hamas to reject it. When it does, then they will be able to move forward with the genocide wiping Palestinians off the map of their own land while delivering a shoulder shrug to any whimpering EU leaders who complain: “We offered Gaza a great deal, but they turned it down” will be Trump’s stock response while he continues to harp on about getting a Nobel peace prize. The Board of Peace is, in truth, a cabal of warmongering dogs who see billions to be made in Gaza. For Trump it will be a good share of the 100 bn dollar reconstruction needed to rebuild government ministries, roads, bridges, sewer works, schools and hospitals. His friends will be given the contracts of course while Netanyahu gives him his brown envelope of prime real estate along the coast so he can build luxury condominiums for high-end Gulf Arabs; for Blair, he will clean up on more multimillion dollar donations to his own global consultancy consortium when GCC leaders will queue up to pay him. If the plan were ever to get off the ground both Blair and Trump would make scores of billions of dollars while Israel gets to keep the IDF inside the strip and carry out a phoney war for the sake of delaying any two-state process.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... -unveiled/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Oct 05, 2025 8:25 pm

HAMAS ANSWERS PRESIDENT PUTIN’S QUESTIONS ON THE TRUMP PLAN FOR GAZA

Image

By John Helmer, Moscow
@bears_with

Last week (October 2) at the Valdai Club conference in Sochi, President Vladimir Putin (lead image, left) responded to a question from an Iranian about the war in Gaza and President Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza which had been released two days earlier in Washington.

“About Trump’s Gaza plan,” Putin replied, “you know, it will probably come as a surprise to you, but on the whole, Russia is ready to support him. If, of course, as we have to look carefully at the proposals made, it will lead to the final goal, which we have always talked about. Russia has always advocated the creation of two states: Israel and a Palestinian state, starting in 1948 and then in 1974, when the relevant UN Security Council resolution was adopted. And this, in my opinion, is the key to a final solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.”

Claiming he had not “looked at this proposal so carefully yet”, Putin enumerated his questions: “First: How long will this international administration work? How and to whom will power be transferred later? As far as I understand, this plan outlines the possibility of transferring power to the Palestinian Authority. In my opinion, it would be better, of course, to put everything under the control of President [Mahmoud] Abbas and the current Palestinian administration. It may be difficult for them to resolve the security issues. But so far as I can imagine, my colleagues, with whom I spoke on this topic today, envisage the possibility of transferring control over the Gaza Strip, including to the local militia, to ensure security. Is this bad? In my opinion, this is a good thing.”

“We need to understand, I repeat, how long the international administration will manage there, in what time frame it is supposed to transfer both civil power and security issues, which is very important. And, in my opinion, this should definitely be supported. We are talking about freeing all the hostages held by Hamas, on the one hand, and releasing a significant number of Palestinians from Israeli prisons. Here, too, we need to understand how many Palestinians, whom, and at what time can we release them? And of course, you know, the most important question is: how does Palestine feel about this? That’s exactly what you need to understand. And the countries of the region, the entire Islamic world, and Palestine itself, the Palestinians themselves, including, of course, Hamas… Of course, Israel’s attitude towards this is also important. We don’t know yet either: how did Israel take it? I do not even know of any public statements on this subject, I just did not have time to look at it. But it’s not even public statements that are important, but in fact how the Israeli leadership will treat this, whether it will fulfill everything that the President of the United States has proposed. There are a lot of questions.”

Putin was skeptical of the role in a Gaza supervisory authority known as the “Board of Peace” (BOP) proposed by Trump for former UK prime minister Tony Blair. Hinting at Blair’s roles in the initiating the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, Putin said “he’s not known as a great peacemaker, but I know him personally. Moreover, I visited him, spent the night at his house, we had coffee in our pyjamas in the morning, and so on…He is a man with his own views, but he is an experienced politician. And in general, of course, if his activities, his experience, and his knowledge are directed towards a peaceful course, then he can play some positive role.”

The next day, October 3, the Hamas leadership issued a 5-paragraph reply to Trump.

This was amplified in a detailed response to the Trump plan in a 21-minute interview broadcast by Al-Arabiya, the Saudi state television channel based in Riyadh. Osama Hamdan (lead image, right), a veteran Palestinian diplomat, advisor to and spokesman for Hamas, answered each of Putin’s questions, and more.Watch and if need be, turn on the English auto-translate function at the Youtube setting.

Hamdan rejects any role for the foreign “board of peace”, proposed by Trump in his plan, and any role as a foreign overseer or viceroy for Blair, whether in his pyjamas or out of them.

This was Trump’s 20-point plan issued on September 29: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/19 ... 1196562494

Four days later, on October 3, Trump announced: “As retribution for the October 7th attack on civilization, more than 25,000 Hamas ‘soldiers’ have already been killed. Most of the rest are surrounded and MILITARILY TRAPPED, just waiting for me to give the word, ‘GO,’ for their lives to be quickly extinguished. As for the rest, we know where and who you are, and you will be hunted down, and killed. I am asking that all innocent Palestinians immediately leave this area of potentially great future death for safer parts of Gaza. Everyone will be well cared for by those that are waiting to help. Fortunately for Hamas, however, they will be given one last chance! Great, powerful, and very rich Nations of the Middle East, and the surrounding areas beyond, together with the United States of America, have agreed, with Israel signing on, to PEACE, after 3000 years, in the Middle East. THIS DEAL ALSO SPARES THE LIVES OF ALL REMAINING HAMAS FIGHTERS! The details of the document are known to the WORLD, and it is a great one for ALL! We will have PEACE in the Middle East one way or the other. The violence and bloodshed will stop. RELEASES THE HOSTAGES, ALL OF THEM, INCLUDING THE BODIES OF THOSE THAT ARE DEAD, NOW! An Agreement must be reached with Hamas by Sunday Evening [October 5] at SIX (6) P.M., Washington, D.C. time. Every Country has signed on! If this LAST CHANCE agreement is not reached, all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas. THERE WILL BE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.”

Trump followed this after seven hours with the claim that “based on the Statement just issued by Hamas, I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE. Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly! Right now, it’s far too dangerous to do that. We are already in discussions on details to be worked out. This is not about Gaza alone, this is about long sought PEACE in the Middle East.”

Eighteen hours later he claimed that “Israel has temporarily stopped the bombing in order to give the Hostage release and Peace Deal a chance to be completed. Hamas must move quickly, or else all bets will be off. I will not tolerate delay, which many think will happen, or any outcome where Gaza poses a threat again. Let’s get this done, FAST. Everyone will be treated fairly!”

According to Hamdan, Trump’s 72-hour deadline for the hostage and prisoner release parts of the plan to be finalized is too fast to be realistic. He also said: “I believe the Israelis do not want to reach an agreement, and therefore they are trying to use every possible pretext for that if there is seriousness on the American side and a commitment to what was presented in the Trump plan.” — Min 15:40.

https://johnhelmer.net/hamas-answers-pr ... more-92462

******

Trump's Gaza blueprint and Erdogan's calculated complicity

Few in the region are shocked by Ankara’s quiet participation in a US-led push to dismantle Hamas. What matters now is how far Erdogan is willing to go to prove his usefulness to Washington – at the expense of the Palestinian resistance.


Musa Ozugurlu

OCT 3, 2025

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

On the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meetings that shaped the fate of Gaza and the Palestinian people, US President Donald Trump met last week with Muslim and Arab leaders. Was it a coincidence that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was seated right next to Trump?

On 23 September, Trump laid out his plan to end the war, calling on world leaders to “stop the war in Gaza immediately.” A week later, accompanied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he presented a 20-point roadmap to the world. Netanyahu was also prompted to apologize to the Qatari leadership for his failed 9 September attempt to target Hamas leaders in Doha, while also expressing regret for the killing of a Qatari security officer.

Major non-NATO ally (MNNA), Qatar, has re-emerged as the designated mediator tasked with restoring “stability” to Gaza. Alongside Egypt, it has presented a proposal that effectively demands Hamas dismantle itself. But another state's role is becoming increasingly visible: NATO member Turkiye.

Following Trump's announcement, Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari highlighted Turkiye's involvement and Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin’s participation in the Doha meetings. According to sources, a lengthy session was held in Doha between Hamas leaders and Qatari, Egyptian, and Turkish officials to review the plan and explore possible amendments. In its latest response, Hamas said that “the group still needed time to study a plan for Gaza,” confirming to mediators that consultations remain ongoing.

Netanyahu’s primary goal since the beginning of the war has been to eliminate Hamas. Sitting right beside Trump, Erdogan kept his criticism of Israel’s war on Gaza to remarks at the UN General Assembly. Now, as the fault lines of Trump’s plan to redesign Gaza take shape, Turkiye's likely role in this US-Israeli project is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Arab consensus and the Gaza redesign

The joint Israeli-American plan has two primary aims: a Gaza Strip without Hamas and a civilian administration that will not obstruct western interests. If Hamas accepts the plan, its leaders will be forced to leave Gaza, which will then be opened up for international investment. The reconstruction of the strip and exploitation of its offshore gas fields are seen as highly lucrative opportunities.

Arab states have largely accepted Washington’s “solution.” Unlike Erdogan, many of them view Hamas as part of the problem. The Saudi–Egyptian–Emirati bloc, which has previously clashed with Turkiye and Qatar over the Muslim Brotherhood, would welcome any move toward Hamas’s elimination.

Just after Trump's plan was revealed, the foreign ministers of Turkiye, Jordan, the UAE, Indonesia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt issued a joint statement expressing “confidence in the US's will to find a path to peace.”

While Qatar officially described Trump’s plan as “constructive but needing negotiation,” Erdogan praised Trump’s “effort and leadership,” adding, “Turkiye will continue to contribute to the process to achieve a just and lasting peace acceptable to all parties.”

According to Axios, citing two sources involved in the talks, Turkiye – alongside Qatar and Egypt – has urged Hamas to accept the deal. This move is expected to increase pressure on the resistance movement, which reportedly requires a consensus with all other Palestinian factions in Gaza before issuing an official response.

Turkiye’s entanglement with Trump and the US

As the plan is set in motion, the political risks are being assumed by Turkiye and Qatar, both of which appear willing to carry the burden.

Qatar's proximity to Washington and the Persian Gulf monarchies is well-established. Hamas leaders have been based in Doha with tacit regional approval since abandoning Damascus in 2012. In Turkiye, however, the debate centers on how Erdogan will position himself. While an Israeli strike on Turkish territory is implausible, political assassinations remain a serious concern.

So, what will determine Erdogan’s policy on Palestine? The key lies in relations with Washington. Outcomes from his recent visit to the White House suggest Erdogan’s hands are tied.

Turkiye is grappling with one of the most severe economic crises in its history. Erdogan has so far managed to stave off collapse, but the worsening situation weakens his hand internationally.

Domestically, Erdogan faces political uncertainty. His crackdown on rivals has intensified, but the use of state power has failed to yield the stability he seeks. Before Erdogan's visit to Washington, former US ambassador to Turkiye and Syria Envoy Tom Barrack, speaking at the 2025 Concordia Annual Summit, remarked, “President Trump says … let’s give them [the Erdogan government] what they need … legitimacy.” Ankara chose not to respond to this condescension.

Just as Trump returned from the Persian Gulf in May with hundreds of billions of dollars in investment deals, Erdogan’s Oval Office visit included a package deal: 225 Boeing passenger jets, a US–Turkiye LNG agreement undermining ties with Russia, and even a nuclear energy memorandum. But unlike the Persian Gulf states, can Turkiye afford to spend so lavishly in the US?

Could Erdogan defy Trump on Gaza as he has on Syria? Does he even have room to maneuver?

No checks on Netanyahu

It is increasingly clear that no mechanism exists to halt Trump and Netanyahu. Western capitals – silent through more than a century of dispossession, from Balfour to today – have suddenly lined up to recognize a Palestinian state, a gesture devoid of substance.

Like the Arab monarchies, western states envision a Palestine without Hamas or other resistance factions. They prefer a “passive” leadership like Mahmoud Abbas’s long-expired Palestinian Authority (PA).

Even this is too much for Israel. While the ageing Abbas’s legitimacy is disputed even among Palestinians, Trump has now conjured a “Peace Council” for Gaza, featuring none other than former British Prime Minister Tony Blair – a man synonymous with modern West Asia’s devastation, chiefly the illegal US-UK-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

If Trump's Gaza plan is implemented, Palestine will effectively be governed by a US–Israel–UK axis, recalling the days of the British Mandate. Those endorsing this formula include the Arab states seeking favor with Trump – and Erdogan, who is eager to reset ties with Washington.

Erdogan’s actual record on Palestine remains contested. Given his historic support for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, his potential role in dismantling the movement is an ironic turn.

Following Trump’s announcement, a key question emerges: Do Erdogan’s declarations on Palestine resonate in Arab and western capitals, or even among Palestinians and Hamas?

When a ceasefire briefly took hold in January 2025, Abu Obeida, former military spokesperson for the Qassam Brigades, thanked the resistance groups in Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen –highlighting Hezbollah, Ansarallah, and only one state actor: Iran. The Sanaa government in Yemen lacks international legitimacy, despite governing the country’s most densely populated provinces.

Western states have also shown no interest in involving Turkiye as a mediator on Palestine. Post-war negotiations have focused on Egypt and Qatar, partly because Turkiye is seen as having taken sides too openly.

Erdogan’s diplomacy has long involved engagement not just with states, but with organizations and individuals. Hamas is one such group, and is now being treated as a negotiable entity in regional diplomacy. The real question is: How valuable is Turkiye’s influence over Hamas in the current context?

Turkiye may be asked to facilitate Hamas’s compliance – not by securing its place at the table, but by helping relocate its leadership.

Trump issued a blunt ultimatum that Hamas has “three or four days” to respond to his latest peace plan. “Hamas is either going to be doing it or not, and if it’s not, it’s going to be a very sad end,” he added.

Trump and Netanyahu are preparing for every outcome. They seem to have chosen Turkiye to provide Hamas with an exit route – and Erdogan appears to have accepted this task as part of his recent White House dealings.

Back in February 2025, Erdogan declared, “The proposals put forward by the new American administration regarding Gaza with the pressure of the Zionist lobby have nothing worth considering or discussing from our perspective.”

That stance now seems to have changed after his Washington visit.

Erdogan was criticized by the Turkish opposition for failing to defend the Sumud Flotilla like Spain did. He now appears poised to promote “peace” rhetoric and a more centrist path. A recent cooperation deal between Turkiye and UNRWA raises questions: Will it involve relocating Hamas leaders or other Palestinians to Turkiye? If Trump’s plan is implemented, how many Hamas officials or Palestinians will Turkiye absorb, and what measures will Ankara take to contain them?

Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, speaking on Tuesday during the talks and Trump’s plan, said “the details of which need to be discussed.” He did not clarify which of the 20 points were up for discussion.

For Qatar, the key issue is not how Gaza will be governed or how Palestinians will live, but who will shelter Hamas’s displaced leadership – and whether Qatar will have to take them in again. For those seeking to reduce the Palestinian cause to the fate of Hamas, Gaza has become a liability. In this new reality, Turkiye seems ready to “look to the future.”

Ankara is now focusing on three key areas: rebuilding Gaza, securing a role in any post-war governing body, and accepting Hamas leaders onto its territory – potentially as bargaining chips later down the line.

Meanwhile, Erdogan hopes to consolidate domestic power, advance his objectives in Syria, and preserve the role of key figures like former Al-Qaeda commander-turned-president, Ahmad al-Shara. All paths now lead through the White House. Though the Palestinian cause may still carry ideological weight for Erdogan, he appears ready to accept realities on the ground.

https://thecradle.co/articles/trumps-ga ... complicity

Trump claims Israel ‘agreed to withdrawal’ as part of 20-point Gaza plan

Israel has openly vowed that it will not leave Gaza, and is said to be plotting a long-term presence in the strip with US backing

News Desk

OCT 5, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: White House)
US President Donald Trump said late on 4 October that Israel has agreed to a withdrawal from Gaza, despite Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu vowing that the army will not leave the besieged enclave.

Image

“After negotiations, Israel has agreed to the initial withdrawal line, which we have shown to, and shared with, Hamas,” the president said on his Truth Social account on Saturday night.

“When Hamas confirms, the Ceasefire will be IMMEDIATELY effective, the Hostages and Prisoner Exchange will begin, and we will create the conditions for the next phase of withdrawal, which will bring us close to the end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE,” he added. “Thank you for your attention to this matter and, STAY TUNED!”

While speaking to Axios on the same day, Trump said, "We are close" to ending the war in Gaza.

"I said, 'Bibi, this is your chance for victory.' He was fine with it," Trump said, using Netanyahu’s nickname. "He's got to be fine with it. He has no choice. With me, you got to be fine."

The interview took place hours after Hamas announced it had agreed to the exchange formula outlined in Trump’s 20-point plan. It also reiterated its readiness to hand over control of Gaza to an independent body of Palestinian technocrats. However, the resistance movement stressed that it must convene with other factions on the other aspects of Trump’s plan.

The Israeli army claimed over the weekend that it had shifted to ‘defensive’ operations in Gaza.

After a call by Trump to halt airstrikes on Friday, Netanyahu’s office said he stopped the offensive to "prepare for the immediate implementation of the first phase of the Trump Plan for the immediate release of all hostages."

Trump thanked Israel on Truth Social on Saturday for “temporarily stopping the bombing,” despite deadly airstrikes continuing across Gaza.

Image

Israel carried out dozens of air strikes and artillery shelling on Gaza City and other areas in the strip on 4 October. Scores of Palestinians were killed.

Tel Aviv has openly declared its intention to remain inside Gaza. While the 20-point Trump plan theoretically envisions an eventual withdrawal from the strip, it allows Israeli forces to remain on the perimeters of Gaza and establish a buffer zone until the strip is “secure from terror.”

Hamas has rejected disarmament, while Israel views it as essential for the deal to go through.

“I have instructed the negotiating team to travel to Egypt for talks that will last only a few days. In the first phase, while Hamas releases all hostages, the Israeli army will maintain control deep inside Gaza. In the second phase, Hamas will disarm and the Gaza Strip will be demilitarized. This will happen either diplomatically, according to the Trump plan, or militarily by us,” Netanyahu said on Saturday.

“There will be no tolerance for Hamas’s attempts to stall, buy time, or evade,” he added. Defense Minister Israel Katz also vowed that the Israeli army would remain in Gaza, forcefully disarm Hamas if it refuses to surrender its weapons, and restart the war if the captives are not released.

Israeli state broadcaster KAN reported that Tel Aviv has informed Washington of its intention to maintain a long-term military presence at three strategic locations in Gaza even after the prisoner exchange and phased withdrawal outlined in Trump’s plan. The positions include a buffer zone inside Gaza, the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egyptian border, and “Hill 70” (Tal al-70 or Tal al-Mantar) — a site located east of Shujaiya in Gaza City.

Image

The report added that Washington “understands Israel’s need” to keep troops stationed at these sites beyond the first withdrawal phase. Under the plan, Israeli forces would begin pulling back once all captives are recovered, initially repositioning along an internal “yellow line” before retreating to a “red line,” where foreign troops operating under a US mandate would take over security management.

According to a senior Israeli official who spoke to Channel 12, Hamas has “insisted on releasing the final hostages only after Israel’s full withdrawal from Gaza."

"Now, however, Israel will carry out only a tactical withdrawal, and even if all hostages are released, the Israeli army will remain deployed across much of Gaza,” the source added.

"Israel must test Hamas with this trial — let’s see if it releases all the hostages within 72 hours. If it doesn’t, Israel can dismantle it; and if it does — even better: we get the hostages back, and Hamas will continue refusing to disarm and leave Gaza — then Israel can dismantle it,” said the diplomatic correspondent for Israel's Channel 14, Tamir Morag.

“It is very likely that this is a trap set by Trump and Netanyahu for Hamas," he added. A delegation representing the resistance movement is expected to head to Cairo on Sunday for the start of talks on the first phase of Trump’s plan.

The meetings will involve the exchange of messages through the mediators, Egypt and Qatar, who will be in the same building as the Israeli delegation and the US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

https://thecradle.co/articles/trump-cla ... -gaza-plan

Israel continues bombing Gaza despite Trump's orders to ‘immediately stop'

In coordination with other Palestinian resistance factions, Hamas agreed to part of the US president's ceasefire plan to 'stop the war and massacres'

News Desk

OCT 4, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: UNICEF/Eyad El Baba)

Israel continued its relentless bombing of Gaza throughout 4 October, despite US President Donald Trump's order the previous day to "immediately" stop its assault on the enclave to allow for the release of Israeli captives held by Hamas.

Israel carried out dozens of air strikes and artillery shelling on Gaza City and other areas in the strip on Saturday.


Medical sources said Israeli bombing killed at least four people in a strike on a home in the Tuffah neighborhood of Gaza City, while two children were killed and eight people wounded in a drone strike on a tent in a camp for displaced people in Khan Yunis.

“The situation is very serious in Gaza City,” stated Gaza Civil Defense Spokesman Mahmud Bassal, adding that his teams were not able to reach all the casualties due to the “presence of tanks and the ongoing bombardment.”

At least 20 Palestinians have been killed since dawn on Saturday.

Trump issued his order after Hamas released a statement agreeing to much of his 20-point plan for a ceasefire in Gaza, including the release of all Israeli captives.

In a statement, Hamas said it appreciated Trump's call for “an end to the war on the Gaza Strip, the exchange of prisoners, the immediate entry of aid, the rejection of occupation of the Strip, and the rejection of the forcible displacement of our Palestinian people from it.”

The statement did not address the movement's disarmament, nor its exile from the Palestinian territory after the war's end, as stipulated in Trump's 20-point plan.

"The priority is to stop the war and massacres, and from this perspective, we responded positively to the Trump plan," Hamas leader Musa Abu Marzouk told Al Jazeera, stressing that the resistance movement welcomed the first nine points in Trump's plan.

The remaining issues related to the future of Gaza are tied to a “collective national position” and should be "based on relevant international laws and resolutions," the statement added.

Abu Marzouk clarified to Al Jazeera that, although Israel has destroyed most of Hamas's military capabilities, the movement would not disarm before the Israeli occupation ends, a Palestinian state is established, and Palestinians govern themselves.

"Based on the Statement just issued by Hamas, I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE. Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly ... this is about long sought PEACE in the Middle East," Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Image

Trump's order allegedly took Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by surprise, journalist and former Unit 8200 member Barak Ravid reported, quoting a senior Israeli official.

However, Israeli journalist and correspondent for Channel 12, Yaron Avraham, confirmed that “everything was discussed and agreed upon in advance. The prime minister spoke yesterday with President Trump before the president’s statement was released and is working with him in full, direct coordination.”

Following Trump's statement, the Israeli government claimed it switched to "defensive operations in the Gaza Strip," and had halted plans to occupy Gaza City, Haaretz reported Saturday.

Netanyahu announced that Israel “is preparing for the immediate implementation of the first stage of Trump's plan for the release of all hostages.”

The prime minister instructed ministers and other officials not to give interviews to the press, as Israeli media went into a frenzy – with some commentators claiming Trump “sacrificed” Netanyahu in pursuit of a Nobel Peace Prize.

The Israeli military issued a statement in Arabic on Saturday, warning residents of Gaza City not to return to their homes and that operations were still underway.

"IDF troops are still encircling Gaza City, and returning to it is extremely dangerous," the military's Arabic-language spokesman, Colonel Avichay Adraee, wrote on X.

"For your safety, avoid returning north or approaching areas of IDF troop activity anywhere - including in the southern Gaza Strip."

Meanwhile, a senior Hamas official informed AFP on Saturday that Egypt would organize a conference for Palestinian resistance factions to determine the post-war future of the Gaza Strip.

Egypt would host an "intra-Palestinian dialogue on Palestinian unity and the future of Gaza, including its administration," the official stated.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Oct 06, 2025 3:09 pm

Israel continues airstrikes on Gaza after Hamas agrees to release all Israeli captives

While accepting the key point of Trump’s ceasefire proposal, the Palestinian resistance movement asked for further negotiations to be conducted regarding the details of the plan.

October 04, 2025 by Aseel Saleh

Image
The Gaza Strip reports that the death toll has risen to 17 following an airstrike on a building in the a-Tufah neighborhood, in eastern Gaza City, seven of the dead are children and 15 others are under the rubble. Photo: X

The Palestinian resistance movement Hamas issued a statement late Friday, October 3, responding to a proposal brought forward by US President Donald Trump on Monday, September 29, to end Israel’s two-year genocidal aggression on Gaza. “The priority is to stop the war and massacres, and from this perspective, we responded positively to the Trump plan,” Hamas leader Musa Abu Marzouk told Al-Jazeera.

Trump was quick to respond on his social media platform Truth Social, writing that “Based on the Statement just issued by Hamas, I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE.” Trump demanded that Israel stop bombing Gaza to enable the return of hostages.

Trump’s 20-point Gaza ceasefire proposal
While Hamas agreed to release all Israeli captives held in Gaza, including those who died, it said the details of certain points of the deal need further discussions.

Prisoners-for-captives swap deal
Trump’s proposal consists of 20 points, mainly focusing on ending the fighting from the Israeli side as well as Hamas’s side, in order to guarantee the safe return of all Israeli captives – both alive and deceased – from Gaza.

In return, 250 Palestinians sentenced to life imprisonment, alongside 1,700 Palestinians arrested from Gaza after October 7, 2023, including women and children, would be freed from the Israeli occupation’s prisons. The dead body of each Israeli captive would be exchanged with 15 dead bodies of Palestinians from Gaza held by Israel.

Minimum aid entry and rehabilitation plan
The entry of a minimum quantity of humanitarian aid and the opening of the Rafah crossing in both directions in accordance with the agreement made on January 19, 2025, is included in the points proposed by the US president. This would be done through a mechanism which guarantees non-interference by neither Israel or Hamas and would be under the supervision of international humanitarian institutions, including United Nations agencies.

The rehabilitation of the completely devastated infrastructure in Gaza has been listed in the proposal too.

Hamas can either stay in Gaza disarmed or leave through a “safe passage”
Although Netanyahu’s government has always insisted that Hamas should totally leave the besieged enclave, the proposal indicates that some Hamas members may be given the option of staying if they agree to “decommission their weapons”. Meanwhile, other Hamas members would be provided a “safe passage” if they wish to leave Gaza to other host countries.

For decades, the Palestinian resistance group has proven its ability to lead its political bureau and military wing and even to mobilize Palestinian and pro-Palestinian grasroots from abroad.

For many, whether Hamas stays in Gaza or departs would not change the equation, and does not mean that Hamas has been defeated by Israel, because it has been entrenched in the mentality of its supporters as an anti-colonial ideology, rather than being merely an armed group.

An independent Palestinian (technocrat) government in the making
Regarding the government that may rule post-war Gaza, Trump suggested the formation of a political Palestinian committee of technocrats to govern the war-torn strip and run daily affairs related to public services and municipalities.

Trump and Blair: from warmongers to peace godfathers
Yet, Trump placed the suggested Palestinian technocratic government under “the oversight and supervision of a new international transitional body” led by him personally and other international members and heads of state, most significantly former British prime minister Tony Blair, as a condition for the “Gaza peace” plan.

This specific condition provoked controversy among analysts and drew derision around the promotion of two “warmongers” as godfathers of the declared international transnational body, which Trump calls the “Board of Peace”.

On the one hand, Trump’s second term has been marked by his administrations’ intensified endeavors to wage wars and contribute to others over the globe, not only in West Asia, but also in the Caribbean, and East Europe.

On the other hand, Blair’s complicity in the invasion and war on Iraq in 2003, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians is indelible in the collective memory of Arab people and people of conscience around the world.

The ISF is to substitute the IOF
Trump presented another controversial point in his proposal, which touches on the immediate deployment of a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) across the Gaza strip after the withdrawal of the Israeli Occupation Forces.

The so-called ISF will be formed of vetted Palestinian officers in Gaza and will be trained by international and Arab partners. Jordan and Egypt will provide consultancy to the new forces given their experiences in the field. Even still, the jurisdiction of these forces will only be confined within the besieged enclave as securing the border areas will be jointly coordinated between Egypt, the ISF, and Israel.

No Palestinian statehood without the demilitarization of all Palestinian factions, including Hamas
The rest of the proposal stipulates a complete demilitarization of all Palestinian factions operating in Gaza, and a reform program which the Palestinian Authority seems to be obliged to complete within a specific timeline, before the recognition of a Palestinian state becomes a reality.

Trump’s real estate fantasies in post-war Gaza
Other points mentioned in the proposal reflected Donald Trump’s fascination with real estate projects, which would most likely be funded by his allies in the Arab Gulf as part of the intended Gaza reconstruction plan.

Trump promises no forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza and no annexation of the enclave
The proposal confirmed that the Palestinian citizens will not be forced to leave Gaza, and that even those who wish to leave would be able to return. Furthermore, Trump pointed out in his proposal that Israel “will not occupy or annex Gaza”.

Most important points in Hamas’s response to the proposal
Hamas asserted in its statement that its response has been formulated after thorough consultations in order to reach a “responsible position” to deal with Trump’s plan.

The movement announced its agreement to release all Israeli captives, both alive and deceased, as per Trump’s proposal, “provided that ending the war and a complete withdrawal” of the IOF from the Gaza strip are achieved.

The resistance group contended that the release of Israeli captives will take place once the “necessary field conditions” are implemented.

Hamas also expressed its willingness to “immediately enter negotiations through mediators to discuss all the details” of the proposal.

It also reaffirmed its acceptance “to hand the administration of Gaza to a Palestinian body represented by independents (technocrats) based on Palestinian national consensus and with Arab and Islamic support”.

Nonetheless, Hamas voiced reservations about what was outlined in Trump’s proposal regarding “the future of the Gaza Strip and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people”, which the movement believes “should be discussed within a consensual Palestinian national framework”.

It also noted that such Palestinian national issues, like discussing the future of Gaza, must be based on international laws and international resolutions, with Hamas being part of the discussions, asserting that it will also be contributing to Gaza’s future with full responsibility.

Trump had previously threatened that “all hell” would break loose against Hamas if the Palestinian resistance group did not accept the deal by Sunday, October 5.

Palestinian diaspora organization the Palestinian Youth Movement denounced the plan, writing that it is an “ultimatum between two unacceptable choices,” which are “continued genocide with refound legitimacy,” or “privatization and control over Palestinians by a wealthy elite who deprive them of all substantive rights.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/10/04/ ... -captives/

*****

Netanyahu ordered drone attack on Sumud Flotilla in Tunisia: Report
US envoy Thomas Barrack previously revealed Israel was behind the attack on the flotilla vessels off the Tunisian coast

News Desk

OCT 4, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Gulcin Bekar/Global Sumud Flotilla)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally ordered strikes on two Gaza-bound aid vessels off Tunisia's coast last month, two US intelligence officials told CBS News.

Israeli forces on 8 and 9 September launched drones from a submarine and dropped incendiary devices onto boats outside the Tunisian port of Sidi Bou Said. Fires broke out but were quickly contained. No casualties were reported.

Breaking news;

Here is the security camera footage from the Family vessel of the Sumud Flotilla, stationing just outside Tunis port. So:
1. Sound of something that the crew identified as a drone.
2. Crews sounds the alarm and calls for help.
3. Explosion.
Draw your conclusions. pic.twitter.com/HmkFG7yaEt

— Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt (@FranceskAlbs) September 8, 2025


The Global Sumud Flotilla, which organized a maritime mission to deliver aid to Gaza, said one of the targeted vessels, the Family, was carrying Portuguese lawmaker Mariana Mortágua the night before the attack.

The group also charged Israel with “deliberately waiting” until “elected officials or high-profile figures were absent.”

A second vessel, the Alma, was struck similarly. “Confirmation of Israeli involvement would not surprise us; it would simply lay bare a pattern of arrogance and impunity so grotesque that it cannot escape eventual reckoning,” the flotilla said in a statement.

The group added, “Whether the purpose of these attacks was to kill us, scare us away, or disable our boats, they recklessly endangered civilians and humanitarian volunteers. The world must take note … We call for urgent, independent investigations into these attacks and full accountability for those responsible.”

Tunisian authorities initially disputed claims that drones caused the fires, asserting that an inspection suggested an internal explosion.

CCTV Footage shows one of the drone attacks that targeted the Global Sumud Flotilla ships in international waters of the Mediterranean Sea.

At least 12 attacks have been reported so far. pic.twitter.com/CUZMkDtRag

— Quds News Network (@QudsNen) September 24, 2025


Pro-Israel accounts on social media blamed mishandling of a flare gun; however, footage released by the flotilla and obtained by CBS News appears to show flames falling onto the vessel from above.

US Ambassador to Turkiye and Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack disclosed last month that Israel was directly responsible for the Tunisia attack.

In an interview with The National on 22 September, Barrack said, “Israel is attacking Syria, Israel is attacking Lebanon, Israel is attacking Tunisia.”

BREAKING: Trump envoy Tom Barrack admits Israel bombed Global Sumud Flotilla ships in Tunisia earlier this month.

In an interview with The National News’ Hadley Gamble, Barrack — Special Envoy for the region dealing with Syria and the leading figure in the administration’s… pic.twitter.com/L3rdJAa4FQ

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) September 22, 2025
Later in September, flotilla members reported being harassed south of Greece by 15 drones, with explosions around several boats and damage to at least 10 vessels.

BREAKING: 🚨 SUMUD FLOTILLA UNDER ATTACK AND HIT 9 TIMES

✅ 9 bombs dropped near their boats within 1 hour
✅ 4 vessels hit
✅ 3 sulphur devices landed on board.
✅ Some vessels are damaged
✅ No serious injuries pic.twitter.com/h58R9n1jVd

— Khalissee (@Kahlissee) September 24, 2025


Israeli forces captured the last of the Global Sumud Flotilla boats on 3 October, detaining the crew and transferring them to Ashdod, where hundreds of other activists were held in custody.

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir paraded through prisons and boarded seized ships, mocking detainees as “terrorists” and filming himself deriding them while some responded with chants of “Free Palestine” in retaliation.

https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu ... sia-report

Testimonies reveal ‘torture, humiliation’ of flotilla activists in Israeli prisons
Israel’s national security minister said he was glad that the activists were being ‘treated like terrorists’ under his policy

News Desk

OCT 6, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: EPA)

Pro-Palestinian activists who were on board the Global Sumud Flotilla reported being mistreated by Israeli authorities following their arrest last week.

One Spanish activist, Goretti Sarasibar, told Reuters after his deportation that the detainees were forced to watch videos of Hamas’s attack on 7 October 2023.

“They didn’t give us food all day,” he said. “Now we are super happy eating, as we were starving.”

Dutch activist Marco Tesh said he could not breathe at one point “because they put something to my face and they tied my hands to my back.”

Another one of the deported activists, Rafael Borrego, said, “At any time that any of us called a police officer, we risked that seven or more fully armed people entered to our cell, as they did on mine, pointing us with weapons at our heads, with dogs ready to attack us, and being dragged to the floor.”

Nineteen Swiss nationals were also on board the flotilla. Nine of them arrived in Geneva on Sunday after being deported, describing “inhumane detention conditions and the humiliating and degrading treatment” by Israeli authorities.


Italian activist Cesare Tofani reported upon arrival in Rome that he and other flotilla participants were “treated terribly” and “harassed.”

“They even treated us violently, pointing weapons at us, and this is absolutely unacceptable for us in a country that considers itself democratic,” said Yassine Lafram, the president of the Union of Islamic Communities in Italy, who landed at Milan Malpensa Airport with other deported activists.

Italian journalist Saverio Tommasi said he and others were treated “like monkeys,” and that Israeli police and soldiers “ridiculed” and “laughed at” the detainees.

Another Italian journalist, Lorenzo D’Agostino, said that his belongings and money were “stolen by the Israelis.”

“You weren’t allowed to look them in the face, always had to keep your head down and when I did look up, a man … came and shook me and slapped me on the back of the head. They forced us to stay on our knees for four hours,” activist Paolo De Montis told AP.

“They are very, very cruel,” said Malaysian sisters Heliza and Hazwani Helmi.

“Can you imagine we drank from the toilet water? Some people were very, very sick, but they [the Israelis] said: ‘Are they dead? If not, then that’s not my problem,’” Hawzani told Turkish media.

“I ate on 1 October. Today is my first meal. So, for three days, I did not eat – only drank from the toilet,” Heliza said.

A Norwegian activist said, “They put us in the heat and didn't give us water. They made sure we were uncomfortable. When we tried to sleep, they placed police officers to shout at us. They tortured us.”

At least two female activists reported having their hijabs removed forcefully.

Over 500 activists were on board the 47 boats that reached the shore of Gaza last week in an attempt to break the siege and deliver aid to starving Palestinians.

Among them were Nelson Mandela’s grandson, Mandla Mandela, and Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg. Around 170 have been detained so far.

Ersin Celik, a Turkish journalist and one of the activists onboard the Global Sumud Flotilla, told Turkish CNN on Saturday that the Israelis “tormented” Greta Thunberg, who is autistic.

He said he saw this with his “own eyes,” adding that they dragged her on the ground and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag.

“The claims regarding the mistreatment of Greta Thunberg and other detainees from the Hamas–Sumud flotilla are brazen lies. All the detainees’ legal rights are fully upheld. Interestingly enough, Greta herself and other detainees refused to expedite their deportation and insisted on prolonging their stay in custody. Greta also did not complain to the Israeli authorities about any of these ludicrous and baseless allegations – because they never occurred,” said the Israeli Foreign Ministry on 5 October.

Minutes after the Israeli Foreign Ministry denied allegations that Thunberg was mistreated, Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, came out and said, “I am proud that the flotilla activists are being treated as terrorists. This is my policy.”

Ben Gvir is in charge of Israel’s policing and prison system and is behind the surge in brutality against Palestinian prisoners over the last few years.

“I am proud of the prison staff acting in accordance with the policy set by Commissioner Kobi Yaakobi and myself. I was on their ships; I saw neither aid nor humanity. I visited Ktzi'ot Prison and was proud that we treated the flotilla activists as supporters of terrorism. Anyone who supports terrorism is a terrorist and deserves the same conditions applied to terrorists,” Ben Gvir added.

https://thecradle.co/articles/testimoni ... li-prisons

Ben Gvir to blow up Netanyahu's coalition if Hamas 'continues to exist' after Trump deal

Netanyahu threatens to resume bombing of Gaza if Hamas fails to release captives within 72 hours of the ceasefire

News Desk

OCT 5, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Oren Ben Hakoon/Flash90)

Israel's influential, extremist National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir threatened on 5 October that his Jewish Power (Otzma Yehudit) party would leave the coalition government if Hamas "continues to exist" after the release of Israeli captives under the Trump ceasefire plan.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has remained in power since late 2022 on the basis of his Likud Party's coalition with Ben Gvir's Otzma Yehudit and the Religious Zionism party, which are committed to continuing the war, ethnically cleansing Gaza, and ideally building settlements for Jewish Israelis in the devastated strip.

After the possibility emerged this weekend that a ceasefire and prisoner exchange based on Trump's so-called ‘peace’ plan could come into effect, Ben Gvir stated his party would not agree to a deal that would leave Hamas intact, which would be a "national defeat" and “eternal disgrace.”

Ben Gvir has threatened to leave Netanyahu's coalition multiple times since Israel's genocide in Gaza began in October two years ago, seeking to pressure the prime minister to continue the violence. He stepped down as National Security Minister when a ceasefire was reached in January, but rejoined Netanyahu's cabinet in March after Israel resumed the war.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also called to ensure that Hamas is dismantled.

“As long as there's a threat emanating from Gaza against Israel security, be it Hamas or some successor organization … there isn't going to be peace,” he claimed

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu vowed that his government will not move ahead with any part of the deal until all captives held by Hamas, living or dead, are returned.

"We will not proceed to any of the 21 clauses of the Trump plan until the first clause – the release of all the hostages, living and deceased, until the last of the hostages, every single one of them, has crossed into Israeli territory – we will not proceed to any other clause," Netanyahu stated while speaking at the Forum of Heroism.

Once a deal is reached and a ceasefire goes into effect, Hamas will allegedly have 72 hours to return the captives. If that deadline passes, Israel will return to bombing and massacring Palestinians.

"If the hostages are not released by the deadline that President Donald Trump set, Israel will return to fighting with the full support of all the involved countries," Netanyahu threatened.

No deadline has been set for Israel to free the 250 Palestinian prisoners and 1,700 Palestinian detainees from Gaza who are set to be released as part of the deal.

Meanwhile, a senior Hamas official told AFP that the movement is ready to move ahead with the Trump plan.

"If the occupation [Israel] has genuine intentions to reach an agreement, we are ready. They must not delay implementation of the plan," a senior Hamas official explained.

However, Hamas officials clarified that the resistance movement would struggle to return all the captives within 72 hours as stipulated. Israeli sources also acknowledged that Hamas would likely need more time, Ynet reported.

Even if the deal is successful, the war ends, and security control of Gaza is handed to an international force, Israel will continue to maintain the "freedom of action" to bomb the strip as it wishes, an Israeli security source told Israel Hayom.

"The current government has proven over the past two years that it thwarts threats without asking permission from others, and that policy will not change toward Gaza," the source said.

"The aspiration is to have an arrangement similar to what we have in Lebanon, where we thwart threats without asking anyone. It does not matter if there are Malaysians, Indonesians, or any other force there. If they do the job, fine. But if they do not, we will."

https://thecradle.co/articles/ben-gvir- ... trump-deal
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Oct 07, 2025 3:41 pm

Two Years of War in Gaza: A Decimated Population and a Collapsing Territory

Two years after the conflict began, Gaza faces collapse: more than 67,000 Palestinians killed, 20,000 of them children, and over ten percent of its population dead or wounded.

Image
Two years on, Gaza stands in ruins as famine spreads and tens of thousands remain unaccounted for amid near-total destruction. Photo: @WENewsEnglish

October 7, 2025 Hour: 7:11 am

Two years after the war in Gaza began on October 7, 2023, the enclave remains shattered. More than 67,000 Palestinians have been killed, including 20,000 children, while over ten percent of the population has been killed or wounded amid ongoing blockade, displacement, and famine.

The conflict began when Hamas launched an assault on Israeli territory, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, with the Nova music festival among its main targets. Israel responded with a full-scale military offensive against Gaza — a campaign that convulsed the region and drew global outrage.

According to Gaza’s Ministry of Health, over 67,000 Palestinians have been killed during the two years of war. Nearly 20,000 were children, meaning more than one child has been killed every hour on average since the fighting began. Out of just over two million residents, more than ten percent have been killed or injured.


Thread 🧵

Two years have passed since Israel launched its genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

Here’s the scale of devastation by the numbers ⤵️

🔗: https://t.co/Dkck1gnYnM pic.twitter.com/fOx1H4MFHa
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) October 7, 2025


The humanitarian situation has reached catastrophic levels. Gaza authorities report that more than 450 people, a third of them children, have died from hunger and malnutrition. On August 22, the United Nations confirmed that famine had taken hold in Gaza Governorate — where the capital lies — after experts warned that more than 640,000 residents were facing “catastrophic” levels of hunger.

Since March, Israel has blocked large-scale humanitarian deliveries by UN trucks. Food, medicine, fuel, and tents have entered the enclave only sporadically.

Israeli forces currently control about 82 percent of Gaza’s territory. The United Nations reports that 92 percent of all homes have been damaged or destroyed, and only 14 of Gaza’s 36 hospitals remain partially functional. Most of the enclave’s population has been displaced multiple times. The Israeli army continues to demolish residential towers and buildings in Gaza City, after having flattened northern areas such as Jabalia, Beit Hanoun, and Beit Lahia, as well as the southern city of Rafah.

Access for journalists remains almost entirely restricted. Israel has barred foreign press from entering Gaza, permitting only tightly controlled, military-escorted visits to select sites. Meanwhile, local reporters have paid an extraordinary price: at least 252 Palestinian journalists have been killed, according to Gaza authorities. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has confirmed 197 media workers killed during the war.

Image
Gaza’s education system has collapsed under the weight of war. Nearly 658,000 school-aged children and 87,000 university students have been left without access to learning as classrooms and campuses lie in ruins.

🔗: https://t.co/Dkck1gnYnM pic.twitter.com/FdysDCSwnW
Image
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) October 7, 2025

In November 2024, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the use of starvation as a weapon of war.

Over the past year, Israel has faced increasing global isolation. Protests, boycotts, and exclusions from cultural, academic, and sporting events have multiplied. A UN committee and several human rights organizations have described the situation in Gaza as genocide.

Countries in Latin America and Europe have taken decisive positions. Brazil accused Netanyahu of genocide — a statement that led Israel to declare President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva persona non grata. Colombia severed diplomatic relations, while Spain imposed an embargo on the sale and purchase of arms and defense equipment.

Since October 2023, twenty countries — including former Israeli allies such as the United Kingdom and France — have officially recognized the State of Palestine. Israel has rejected these moves, insisting that a Palestinian state “will never be a reality.”

After two years of continuous assault, Gaza lies in ruins — its cities leveled, its people starving, its future uncertain. The numbers tell a story of collective devastation and a war that shows no sign of ending.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/two-year ... territory/

******

Gaza Outrage at Trump’s ‘Governor Blair’ Plan
October 6, 2025

The return of this name to the scene in Gaza signals the return of the same policies that set the Middle East on fire, writes Shaimaa Eid.

Image
Tony Blair at an international internet conference in 2018. (Web Summit, Flickr, CC BY 2.0)

By Shaimaa Eid
in Gaza
Declassified UK

Amid growing controversy over Donald Trump’s plan to end the war on the Gaza Strip, one aspect has caused particular concern.

That is the suggestion Britain’s former prime minister Tony Blair could be a “temporary governor” of Gaza.

Palestinians, exhausted by war and stripped of their homes and loved ones, view this move as an attempt to reimpose foreign guardianship over Gaza.

Voices of anger and rejection are rising from the displacement tents in Al Mawasi, Khan Younis.

Here, people fear an extension of old colonial projects resurfacing today under a new political guise.

‘Colonial Guardianship’

Palestinian journalist Rifka Al Amya describes the idea as “insulting and outrageous,” telling Declassified:

“I strongly object to the notion of Tony Blair or any foreign figure being appointed as a temporary governor of the Gaza Strip. I see it as a renewed form of colonial trusteeship that has long ignored the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination.”

Al Amya adds firmly that what is being proposed today, after two years of systematic genocide and 77 years of oppression, ethnic cleansing, and massacres, reveals a deep disregard for the history and struggle of the Palestinian people — and a desire to impose solutions that diminish their rights rather than restore them.

She believes that what is happening confirms that the international community has not only allowed violence against Gaza, but is also actively working to cement a political reality that takes us back to a time even worse than before.

‘No One Here Needs a Foreign Ruler’

Image
Aerial view of the Al-Mawasi area, where displaced Palestinians live in tents, January 2025. (Ashraf Amra, UNRWA: United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0)

Just a few metres from the sea in Khan Younis, Abdel Fattah Al Amssi, a man in his seventies, sits on the hot sands of Al Mawasi under the blazing sun beside his torn tent.

When asked about Tony Blair, he erupted angrily:

“Blair? Isn’t he the one who stood with Bush in the Iraq war? What did he do there except bring destruction? And now they want to send him to rule Gaza? This is an insult to the people of Gaza who have made sacrifices, and an insult to the entire Palestinian people.”

Al Amssi then gestured toward the endless stretch of tents, saying: “No one here needs a foreign ruler. We have our own men and women capable of managing their country.

“Blair will not come to show us mercy, but to serve the interests of those who want Gaza disarmed, without resistance or dignity.”

The elderly man, who has lived through all of Gaza’s wars since 1967, concludes with a stern tone filled with disappointment and lost trust:

“Those who have endured displacement and death will not surrender their fate to a man whose hands are stained with the blood of Arabs. We completely reject that, because after this genocide, we trust no one but ourselves.”

‘Replacing One Occupation With a More Elegant One’

Image
Jabalia camp destruction by Israel in Gaza, October 2024. (Al Jazeera/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 4.0)

From another tent set up amid the sands, 28-year-old Imad Saif, displaced from Gaza City whose home was destroyed by the occupation in Jabalia Camp, speaks as he tries to build a makeshift toilet for his family beside the tent.

“We want to govern ourselves, not be ruled by a man who was once a friend to those who destroyed Gaza and forced us to live through displacement and oppression,” he says.

“What is being proposed to us is not a solution, but a replacement of one occupation with a more elegant one. The West has never come to show us mercy.

The person they appoint as our ruler today is the same one who supported the wars of yesterday. We do not want anyone to govern us; we just want to live with dignity and rebuild our homes with our own hands, not by orders from abroad.”


Imad’s words, along with those who spoke before him, reflect a widespread sentiment among Palestinians here in Gaza: that the West continues to view Gaza through the lens of control and management, rather than justice and rights.

‘Foreign Rulers Bring Nothing But Destruction’

Amid a scene that encapsulates the tragedy, with tents stretching endlessly across the horizon, Naima Al Astal, a woman in her late sixties, sat trying to light a small stove using dry firewood to prepare a cup of tea.

She was too exhausted to speak, but when asked about the idea of Tony Blair overseeing Gaza, she responded with a few words that summed up seven decades of waiting.

“We are tired of experiments,” she said.

“Every time, they tell us the solution will come from outside. But foreign solutions only bring us destruction, devastation, and misery. If anyone truly wants to help Gaza, let them stop the war, not come to rule over us.”

‘Bloody Legacy That Cannot Be Erased’

Many Palestinians associate the name Tony Blair with the 2003 war on Iraq, when he took part in an invasion that devastated an entire Arab country under the pretext of “spreading democracy.”

For them, the return of this name to the scene in Gaza signals the return of the same policies that set the Middle East on fire.

In every interview with a displaced person, a journalist, or an elder, the same message is repeated: a rejection of guardianship, a firm hold on dignity, and a demand for the right to self-determination.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/06/g ... lair-plan/

******

Image

Everything Before AND After October 7 Explains Why October 7 Happened

Israel supporters don’t want you looking at what happened before October 7, and they don’t want you looking at anything that’s happened since.

Caitlin Johnstone
October 7, 2025

Everything before October 7 explains why October 7 happened, and so does everything that’s happened since.

Look at what happened before October 7 and you’ll see year after year of murder, oppression and abuse.

Look at everything that’s happened since October 7 and you’ll understand the kind of sadistic, psychopathic regime the Palestinians have been living under this entire time.

Israel supporters don’t want you looking at what happened before October 7, and they don’t want you looking at anything that’s happened since. They just want you to pretend history began and ended with a bunch of Hitlerite savages attacking innocent Jews for no reason.


And they don’t even want you looking at the day of October 7 too closely, either. Looking too closely at the events of that day bring up inconvenient questions about the Hannibal Directive and what percentage of the death toll was actually caused by the IDF firing on their own people. Inconvenient questions about the suspicious stock trading in the lead-up to the attack and the mountains upon mountains upon mountains of evidence that high-level Israeli officials allowed the attack to proceed undefended in order to advance the genocidal land grab we’re seeing advanced now.

They only want you looking at the parts of October 7 that make Israel look like an innocent little lamb who was attacked completely out of the blue and had no choice but to reluctantly respond with military force.

Forget the scorched earth incineration of the Gaza Strip.

Forget the bombed-out hospitals and methodically dismantled healthcare system.

Forget the hundreds upon hundreds of Palestinians in Gaza who’ve been deliberately starved to death.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/shorts/FEvaTkfFUWo?feature=share[/youtube]

Forget the fact that every relevant human rights institution on earth has determined that Israel is committing genocide, and that zero comparable humanitarian institutions have said it isn’t.

Forget the fact that human rights experts had been describing Gaza as a giant concentration camp or open-air prison for years prior to October 7.

Forget the fact that Israel had been routinely murdering Palestinian children and other civilians in the months prior to the Hamas attack.

Don’t look at any of that stuff. Just look at the stuff that makes Israel look like the victim.

That’s the story, anyway. Luckily, fewer and fewer people are buying into it.

The longer this genocide goes on for, the more the world has come to view October 7 as Israel reaping what it had long been sowing.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2025/10 ... -happened/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:37 pm

The Gates of Hell: Open Long Before Trump’s Threats
October 7, 2025

By Youssef Fares – Oct 4, 2025

Image

US President Donald Trump threatened to open the “gates of hell” on Gaza if Hamas doesn’t accept the deal by Sunday night, while the Israeli side opened the gates regardless, unleashing one of its most brutal air and ground attacks on the city to date. The occupation is employing every tool of annihilation, from warplanes and artillery to car bombs and quadcopter drones. More than half a million residents, trapped in a constricted zone, are enduring around-the-clock bombardment designed to force them out.

In Sheikh Radwan and al-Nafaq, northeast of Gaza City, five car bombs were detonated on Friday, obliterating nearly 50 homes. Israeli warplanes also struck a crowd on al-Maghrabi Street in al-Sabra neighborhood, killing seven people, mostly women and children. In western Gaza, homes near Abu Hasira Street by the port were attacked, while another massacre targeted displaced families sheltering in tents along the port area, resulting in around 30 casualties, most of whom were unable to flee south.

According to Gaza’s civil defense spokesman, Mahmoud Basal, the besieged city is collapsing under unbearable conditions after the occupation cut off al-Rashid Street, halting the entry of food convoys, goods, and medical aid. He noted that Israeli bombardment has doubled in intensity over the past two days, particularly after Israeli war minister Yisrael Katz declared that anyone still inside Gaza City is a “legitimate target.”

While Trump urged Palestinians to flee areas he described as “future death area”, referencing Gaza City. James Elder, a spokesman for the UN children’s agency UNICEF, told journalists in Geneva: “The notion of a safe zone in the south is farcical,” Speaking from Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, Elder pointed to how “bombs are dropped from the sky with chilling predictability; schools, which had been designated as temporary shelters are regularly reduced to rubble, (and) tents… are regularly engulfed in fire from air attacks”.



In southern and central Gaza, supposedly designated as “humanitarian areas” by the occupation, have proven no safer than the north. In Maghazi refugee camp, Israeli strikes caused more than 13 casualties, while in Deir al-Balah, a tent sheltering displaced families was bombed.

The hardest incident took place in Mawasi area of Khan Younis, where Israeli drones targeted two vehicles belonging to the Radaa’ unit, the field wing of the resistance security in Gaza, during a field operation. According to the unit, its fighters had been confronting individuals involved in killing resistance members. While withdrawing, following the operation, the Israeli forces hit the vehicles, resulting in 20 martyrs and wounding others.

Over the past week, southern and central Gaza have been hit by nearly 30 airstrikes on civilian gatherings and forcibly displaced persons’ camps, resulting in around 150 martyrs. Almost 40% of the martyrs are in the very areas the occupation labels as “safe” and “humanitarian.”

https://orinocotribune.com/the-gates-of ... s-threats/

******

Diplomatic Jujitsu: How Hamas Reconfigures Trump’s Plan into Strategic Diplomacy
Posted by Internationalist 360° on October 4, 2025

Image
Rima NajjarHamas, from a subject of coercion into an agent of strategic disruption

Hamas’s Conditional Acceptance Disrupts the U.S.-Israeli Containment Strategy

Author’s Note: This essay argues that Hamas’s conditional acceptance of the Trump administration’s Gaza peace proposal represents a strategic reconfiguration of its political identity, not a retreat, but a recalibration. By leveraging the language of international law and regional consensus, Hamas disrupts the U.S.-Israeli policy of containment and exposes the underlying asymmetry of a diplomatic process that demands Palestinian capitulation while enabling Israeli impunity. The analysis traces Hamas’s evolution from a purely militant organization to a savvy diplomatic actor, demonstrating how its response exploits the contradictions within the U.S.-Israeli alliance. Finally, the essay explores the regional ramifications of this move, particularly for Lebanon’s Hezbollah, where the perceived success or failure of Hamas’s diplomatic gambit could determine the future of the “axis of resistance.” This act of conditional refusal transforms Hamas from a subject of coercion into an agent of strategic disruption, challenging the very spectacle of U.S.-led diplomacy in the region and reasserting resistance as a force of regional recalibration.

In a region where every gesture is freighted with existential stakes, Hamas’s partial acceptance of Trump’s 20-point proposal marks a moment of calculated diplomacy that disrupts the spectacle of U.S.-Israeli diplomacy — a performance designed to orchestrate a managed surrender rather than achieve a just peace. Far from capitulation, the move signals a strategic pivot — one that reframes Hamas not merely as a militant actor but as a negotiator capable of leveraging international law, regional consensus, and symbolic restraint.

I. From Armed Resistance to Political Legitimacy

Founded in 1987 during the First Intifada, Hamas emerged from the Muslim Brotherhood’s social infrastructure in Gaza, positioning itself as an Islamist alternative to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Its early charter rejected any compromise with Israel and embraced armed struggle as the sole path to liberation. This uncompromising stance earned Hamas both grassroots support and international isolation.

Yet even in its early years, Hamas demonstrated a capacity for strategic recalibration. During the 1990s, while opposing the Oslo Accords, it began participating in municipal elections and cultivating a parallel governance structure through charitable networks. This duality — resistance and service — laid the groundwork for its political ascent.

That trajectory deepened in 2017, when Hamas issued a revised political document that removed language previously deemed antisemitic — not in the Western European sense rooted in racialized exclusion and genocidal ideology, but in a cultural-religious framework shaped by centuries of theological contestation and colonial experience. This revision reframed Hamas’s opposition as directed not against Judaism as a faith, but against Zionism as a settler-colonial project that instrumentalizes religious narratives to justify territorial dispossession. Yet this ideological recalibration is often flattened in Western discourse, which continues to cast Hamas as a monolithic militant entity — not to mention its designation as a terrorist organization by a small subset of Western-aligned states—including the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and all 27 member states of the European Union—as well as by the European Union, which, while not a state, has adopted similar classifications through Council-level sanctions.

This label, deployed as a tool of diplomatic exclusion, forecloses engagement with Hamas’s evolving political posture and reinforces a securitized lens that privileges Israeli strategic narratives over Palestinian testimonial sovereignty (the ethical right to narrate one’s experience without external reframing). It functions less as a legal classification than as a rhetorical weapon, one that delegitimizes any form of resistance while elevating Israeli state violence as self-defense. In this framework, Hamas’s charter revision, its engagement with international law, and its overtures toward regional consensus are rendered invisible, dismissed as tactical ploys rather than substantive shifts.

Even strategic analyses that acknowledge Hamas’s deterrence logic — such as those by Israeli scholar Daniel Sobelman — operate within frameworks that abstract Palestinian resistance into metrics of military leverage. Sobelman’s work on asymmetric deterrence offers valuable insight into Hamas’s evolving posture, but his positionality as a former Israeli intelligence officer embedded in Zionist institutions must be critically contextualized. His voice is amplified in Western academic and policy circles, while Palestinian scholars like Omar Barghouti, whose work on BDS foregrounds nonviolent resistance and international law, are systematically vilified and excluded. To counter this asymmetry in ways of knowing, it is essential to pair strategic readings with testimonial accounts from Palestinian and Arab intellectual traditions. Scholars such as Lama Abu-Odeh and Fawwaz Traboulsi emphasize the ethical and historical dimensions of resistance, framing Hamas not merely as a security threat but as a political actor embedded in a decolonial tradition. Juxtaposing these perspectives restores narrative sovereignty and affirms the necessity of reading Hamas’s diplomacy through both strategic and ethical lenses.

With its evolving political identity established, Hamas’s engagement with Trump’s proposal emerges as a strategic continuation — not a deviation.

II. Hamas’s Diplomatic Engagement with Trump’s Proposal

Despite its pariah status in the West, the movement has steadily expanded its diplomatic footprint, engaging with regional powers like Qatar, Turkey, and Iran, and more recently with Russia and China. These relationships have served multiple purposes: securing humanitarian aid, legitimizing its governance in Gaza, and positioning itself as a stakeholder in regional stability.

Hamas’s diplomatic turn accelerated in the aftermath of the October 7 attacks. According to Hamas Political Bureau, it conducted over 130 diplomatic meetings in 2024 — nearly five times its previous annual average. These included engagements with 23 countries and numerous non-state actors, insisting on the fact that it is both a militant movement and a negotiator.

The movement’s rhetoric continues to foreground international laws and resolutions — not as a newfound concession, but as a longstanding framework through which it contests occupation, siege, and displacement. By invoking these norms in its response to Trump’s proposal, Hamas reasserts its position within globally recognized legal discourse, even as it refuses to abandon its resistance credentials.

In contrast, Israel’s continued defiance of international law, its repeated violations of UN resolutions, its refusal to comply with ICJ rulings, and its systematic targeting of civilian infrastructure, positions it outside the legal order entirely. What more dramatic indictment is needed than its public shredding of the UN Charter, broadcast live to an international audience that watches, condemns, and ultimately enables?

This extralegal posture reverberates through the current negotiations, where Israel enters not as a state bound by law, but as a sovereign exception to it — i.e., where legal norms are suspended to consolidate state power. The very premise of dialogue is distorted: demands for ceasefire, humanitarian access, or accountability are reframed as concessions rather than obligations. Palestinian negotiators, civil society actors, and international legal advocates find themselves pleading for adherence to norms that Israel has already voided. The result is not negotiation but coercion — an asymmetrical theater in which law is invoked only to be suspended, and where the architecture of impunity is mistaken for diplomacy.

This legal and diplomatic positioning by Hamas exposes the fundamental pitfalls and contradictions within the U.S.-Israeli approach, which relies on brinkmanship and bad faith.

III. The Pitfalls: Trump’s Brinkmanship and Netanyahu’s Contradictions

1. Trump’s Brinkmanship

President Trump’s framing of the Gaza proposal — delivered with the threat that “all HELL, like no one has ever seen before” would follow Hamas’s rejection — is emblematic of his coercive, zero-sum approach to diplomacy. The tweet did not respond to an actual rejection; rather, it preemptively cast refusal as illegitimate, foreclosing dissent before it could be voiced. This ultimatum, couched in apocalyptic language, reveals a strategy less concerned with negotiation than with domination. But coercion cannot substitute for consensus, especially when the proposal itself is riddled with ambiguities and lacks enforceable guarantees.

Hamas’s partial acceptance, articulated in its official statement titled Important Statement on Hamas’ Response to U.S. President Trump’s Proposal, exposes the fragility of Trump’s timeline. The movement’s insistence on clarification, its rejection of the economic framework, and its call for national consensus before any technocratic transition all signal a refusal to be boxed into a binary of compliance or annihilation. By invoking international law and regional consultation, Hamas reframes the proposal not as a peace offer but as a pressure tactic — one that demands resistance through diplomatic engagement rather than military escalation.

Image
Hamas’s response to Trump’s proposal as circulated on social media

Trump’s claim that “every country has signed on” is contradicted by the cautious responses of key regional actors. Egypt and Qatar have emphasized the need for Palestinian unity and a sustainable ceasefire, while Jordan and Turkey have expressed concern over the plan’s unilateralism. Hamas’s engagement with these mediators — rather than direct submission to Trump’s terms — reveals the hollowness of the claim and the performative nature of the ultimatum.

2. Israel’s Negotiation Deceptions and Strategic Dissonance

Israel’s endorsement of Trump’s proposal is undermined by its actions on the ground. While Netanyahu publicly supports the plan, the Israeli military continues its operations in Gaza, including targeted assassinations and the destruction of civilian infrastructure. These actions contradict the spirit of the proposal, which ostensibly calls for a phased withdrawal and the release of hostages.

Moreover, Israel has refused to commit to the full terms outlined in the plan, particularly those involving the transfer of Gaza’s administration to a Palestinian technocratic body. Netanyahu’s government has issued statements suggesting that any such transition must be vetted by Israeli security agencies — a move that effectively nullifies Palestinian sovereignty and reasserts Israeli control under the guise of coordination.

This strategic dissonance reveals a deeper fissure between the U.S. and Israel. While Trump seeks a legacy-defining peace accord, Netanyahu appears more invested in preserving Israel’s military leverage and domestic political capital. His maneuvering reflects a familiar pattern: endorsing peace frameworks for international optics while sabotaging their implementation through on-the-ground escalation and bureaucratic obstruction.

Hamas, recognizing this duplicity, has chosen to engage with regional and international mediators rather than rely solely on U.S.-Israeli channels. Its response to Trump’s proposal — conditional, consultative, and grounded in international law — exploits the contradictions within the alliance and repositions Hamas as a diplomatic actor navigating asymmetrical terrain with strategic precision.

IV. What Hamas’s Agreement Means for Lebanon

The ultimate success of Hamas’s diplomatic gambit will be measured not only in Gaza but in its ripple effects across the region, with Lebanon serving as the most immediate and volatile barometer, where Hezbollah’s posture is tethered to Hamas’s resistance credentials and regional standing.

Crucially, Hamas did not agree to disarm. Instead, it deferred the question, insisting that any decision regarding weapons must emerge from a “comprehensive national stance” and align with “relevant international laws and resolutions.” Senior official Mousa Abu Marzouk clarified that Hamas would only hand over its weapons to a future Palestinian state — not to Israel, not to the U.S., and not to any externally imposed authority.

This rhetorical precision is strategic: Hamas is acutely aware that even the optics of disarmament, however deferred or symbolic, risk undermining Hezbollah’s claim to be the region’s last uncompromised axis of resistance. In resistance politics, symbolism is strategy. The mere suggestion that Hamas might relinquish arms threatens to isolate Hezbollah as an outlier — no longer part of a unified front, but a relic of a fading paradigm. In this context, Lebanon becomes a mirror: not of Gaza’s liberation, but of its containment. The transition in Gaza, framed as peace, may in fact signal the managed pacification of resistance — an outcome Lebanon is pressured to emulate or resist.

Yet the stakes are not unilateral. If the agreement is perceived as surrender — an externally imposed framework that dissolves Hamas’s authority without securing Palestinian sovereignty — it could trigger backlash across Lebanon’s political spectrum. Hezbollah, which has long positioned itself as a strategic partner to Hamas in a united front against Israeli expansionism, would seize the moment to reaffirm that negotiation is capitulation, that resistance remains the only viable path. This alliance is not symbolic — it is infrastructural, forged through joint operations, shared intelligence, and a common understanding that Israel’s military doctrine treats Gaza and Lebanon as interchangeable theaters of containment. A perceived weakening of Hamas’s resistance posture would embolden Hezbollah’s military stance, justify cross-border escalation, and silence reformist factions calling for de-escalation and political restructuring. The outcome hinges on whether Hamas can maintain its resistance credentials while navigating the diplomatic terrain — a balancing act that Lebanon is not merely watching, but absorbing into its own strategic calculus.

V. Conclusion

In conclusion, Hamas’s conditional refusal has disrupted the diplomatic script in ways armed resistance alone could not. By accepting the frame of negotiation while rejecting its coercive content — its asymmetrical terms, deferred sovereignty, and juridical traps — Hamas has exposed the hollow core of a peace process never designed to deliver sovereignty. The spectacle has been broken. No longer shielded by diplomatic theater, the world must now witness not a managed surrender, but a real, messy, and strategically fraught political struggle — one whose outcome will redefine the balance of power and the meaning of resistance in the Middle East for years to come.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/10/ ... diplomacy/

******

Israeli army intercepts latest wave of Gaza-bound aid boats

The new flotilla of nine vessels was carrying over $100,000 in medicine, food supplies, and essential equipment

News Desk

OCT 8, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

The Israeli army intercepted a new Gaza-bound flotilla of vessels carrying humanitarian aid for the besieged strip on 8 October, just days after seizing the Global Sumud Flotilla’s boats and detaining and mistreating hundreds of activists.

The new flotilla was made up of nine boats and belonged to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC).

“Early morning, Gaza time, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition and Thousand Madleens to Gaza ships were illegally intercepted by Israeli occupation forces. Participants – humanitarians, doctors, and journalists from across the world – have been taken against their will,” Global Sumud Flotilla said on social media.

“The Israeli military has no legal jurisdiction over international waters. Our flotilla poses no harm. We carry vital aid worth over $110,000 in medicines, respiratory equipment, and nutritional supplies that were destined for Gaza's starving hospitals,” said the International Committee to Break the Siege on Gaza (ICBSG), a founding member of the FFC.


The Israeli Foreign Ministry said that “Another futile attempt to breach the legal naval blockade and enter a combat zone ended in nothing.”

“The vessels and the passengers are transferred to an Israeli port. All the passengers are safe and in good health. The passengers are expected to be deported promptly,” it added.

Footage on social media showed Israeli troops boarding some of the flotilla’s boats bound for Gaza, including the Conscience and the Thousand Madleens vessels.


The interception took place in international waters, around 150 nautical miles off the coast of Gaza. Israel’s Shayetet 13 naval commando unit carried out the interception within 40 minutes.

Troops were forced to use a helicopter to board the Conscience due to its large size.

“The Conscience ship is currently under attack by an Israeli military helicopter. The vessel is carrying 93 journalists, doctors, and activists,” FFC said as the interception was happening.

FFC had announced on 7 October that its fleet, carrying around 100 activists, was approaching Gaza.

Just days earlier, the Israeli army intercepted the Global Sumud Flotilla – detaining and deporting around 500 activists, including Greta Thunberg and Nelson Mandela’s grandson, Mandla Mandela.

The interception came after several weeks of Israeli threats and harassment – including drone strikes on the flotilla’s boats along the journey.

The activists were denied medicine, food, and proper sleep, and were ridiculed and humiliated by Israeli authorities.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... -aid-boats

Washington burns through $34bn supporting Israel in post-7 October wars: Report

Ten percent of Gaza's population has been directly killed or injured by US-made munitions since the start of the genocide

News Desk

OCT 7, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Jack Guez/Getty Images)

The US has provided Israel with $21.7 billion in military aid since the start of the genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, policy analyst and senior Quincy Institute research fellow William D. Hartung wrote in a paper for the Watson School of International and Public Affairs.

The paper was released on the second anniversary of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, as Israel’s genocidal war entered its third year.

“This figure does not include the tens of billions of dollars in arms sales agreements that have been committed for weapons and services that will be paid for and delivered in the years to come,” the paper reads.

Washington has also spent between $9.65 and $12.07 billion on operations in Yemen “and the wider region sparked by or in support of Israeli military operations” since 7 October 2023, according to a companion report written by Harvard Kennedy School’s Linda Bilmes and cited by Hartung.

In total, the number stands at between $31.35 and $33.77 billion in “two years of post-10/7 wars.”

US President Donald Trump is now seeking congressional approval to sell Israel $6.4 billion in support equipment and weapons, including attack helicopters and troop carriers.

Another companion report by University of Oxford professor Neta Crawford notes that more than 10 percent of Gaza’s population has been directly killed or injured in the two years of brutal war.

“The destruction of infrastructure – including energy, water, sanitation, agriculture, housing, and healthcare – [has] rendered the conditions of life so difficult as to cause long-term harm for the rest of the population,” Crawford wrote.

Citing an official death toll, Crawford adds that 67,075 Palestinians have been killed and 169,430 injured – a total of 236,505 casualties.

However, in July, The Lancet medical journal published a research correspondence on the difficulty of accounting for the number of those killed by Israel's war on Gaza, highlighting that both direct and indirect deaths should be considered.

It said at the time that if the war were to end immediately – taking into account indirect deaths from disease and shortages caused by the war – up to 598,000 Palestinian deaths is a possibility.

The reports come as Israel continues deadly strikes across Gaza despite highly critical ceasefire talks and a claim that Tel Aviv’s forces have shifted to ‘defensive’ operations.

Israeli ground operations have also continued. Troops carried out several incursions in Gaza City, while targeting displaced Palestinians returning to their homes with shelling and gunfire.

Tel Aviv has openly declared its intention to remain inside Gaza. While the 20-point Trump plan theoretically envisions an eventual withdrawal from the strip, it allows Israeli forces to remain on the perimeters of Gaza and establish a buffer zone until the strip is “secure from terror.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/washingto ... ars-report
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Oct 09, 2025 2:12 pm

Hamas, Israel agree to first phase of Gaza ceasefire under Trump plan

Israel’s captives are set to be released after 72 hours in exchange for the release of nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners

News Desk

OCT 9, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

The newly announced ceasefire agreement, which was reached by mediators overnight, is set to take effect in Gaza on 9 October.


Phase one of US President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan will begin in the coming hours and days.

According to Israel’s Channel 14, the signing of the agreement will be followed by Israeli cabinet and government meetings to ratify the deal.

The Israeli army will then carry out its first withdrawal from Gaza’s population centers, in line with the agreement’s withdrawal map.

Twenty living Israeli captives will be released following 72 hours. In exchange, Tel Aviv is required to release 250 prisoners serving life sentences and 1,700 Palestinians detained from Gaza since 7 October 2023.

It remains unclear if Israel has approved the list of high-profile prisoners whose release Hamas has demanded, as the names have not been published.

Hamas leader Osama Hamdan said five border crossings will be opened for aid to enter the strip and be distributed by the UN and international aid groups.

According to an Israeli official in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, cited by Channel 12, the ceasefire will not come into effect until the government ratifies the agreement on Thursday afternoon.

Drone strikes and artillery shelling have been reported in Gaza, despite announcements of the ceasefire.

Trump announced early Thursday that the “first phase” of the deal has been signed off on following hours of negotiations in Egypt.

“This means that ALL of the hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw [its] troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a strong, durable and everlasting Peace,” he added, calling it a “great day for the world.”

“Tonight, an agreement was reached on all the provisions and implementation mechanisms of the first phase of the Gaza ceasefire agreement, which will lead to ending the war, the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, and the entry of aid. The details will be announced later,” said Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari.

Hamas also released a statement confirming that an agreement has been reached.

“An agreement has been reached to end the war on Gaza, withdraw occupation forces from the strip, allow the entry of aid, and carry out a prisoner exchange,” Hamas said. “We call upon President Trump, the guarantor states of the agreement, and all Arab, Islamic, and international parties to compel the occupation government to fully implement the terms of the agreement and prevent it from evading or delaying.”

“We affirm that the sacrifices of our people will not be in vain,” it added.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-isr ... trump-plan

*****

Amnesty Right-Washes Israeli Crimes Again
October 8, 2025

Image
Posters of militants who were captured during the October 7, 2023, Al-Aqsa Flood. The flyers are part of a campaign started by Israeli artists Nitzan Mintz and Dede Bandaid in New York City, 2023. The posters, which often feature the word "kidnapped" and the individual's photo, are intended to misinform on the nature of the conflict. They are reminiscent of missing person flyers and are part of a grass-roots effort that has spread to cities worldwide. Photo: AFP.

By Ingrid Chahine – Oct 2, 2025

Amnesty International released a statement Tuesday morning, calling on Palestinian factions to “immediately and unconditionally release all civilians held hostages in the occupied Gaza Strip”.

The timing of the Amnesty statement – two years into a genocidal war on the Strip – is neither neutral nor accidental. It also coincides with President Donald Trump’s deal for “peace” in Gaza, and all the regional and international pressure exerted on Hamas to settle.

An “investigation” by The Free Press recently highlighted internal divisions within the organisation with staff and directors debating whether a report on October 7 would be used politically to overshadow Israel’s ongoing crimes. Sources within the organization spoke of delays, debates, and the kind of institutional hesitation that can often arise when donors and/or lobbyists loom in the background.

The organization released a statement that addresses October 7th and “Hamas’s abuses” in a language that closely mirrors Israeli narratives, to a point where reaffirming genocide charges loses what remains of its meaning. Stating that this is a genocide two years later is not evidence of integrity, but of “PR politics”.

Consequently, the pressure exerted from the zionist lobby on one side, and the rightful internal resistance on the other, have led to the creation of a “both sides” narrative that shields the organization from criticism and sidelining, while allowing it to still ride the humanitarian wave.

Distorted language and biased allegations
A closer reading of Amnesty’s statement reveals the lopsided framing of events, thus reproducing Israeli discourse. The opening paragraphs start with the so-called hostages, briefly mention the systematic killing and starvation of Palestinians, then circle back to the “heightened fears over the fate” of the Israeli “civilians” who are still in the Strip. The statement provides extensive and intimate descriptions of “the last remaining of the 251 people – mostly citizens – who were seized”. Amnesty also relies heavily on Israeli data. The organization cites Haaretz’s database on hostages with no independent verification, and repeats the unproven allegations of sexual violence, despite the fact that the Zionist entity has a documented history of fabricating such claims for propaganda purposes.

The violence was ignored by mainstream media, underscoring the politics that shape the humanitarian sector and the behavior of its actors: Palestinians are silenced, marginalised and policed, while international organizations and NGOs in general posture as saviors and even guardians of human rights, but only in contexts that do not challenge Israel and its allies.



Meanwhile, Palestinian prisoners are reduced to a side note. Amnesty itself addressed the increased use of unlawful administrative detention by Israeli forces as well as the enforced disappearance policy or incommunicado detention. Citing the NGO Hamoked in a 2024 publication, the organization published “some 5,262 Palestinians were held without charge or trial at the end of the year: 3,376 under administrative detention orders and 1,886 under the Unlawful Combatants Law”. Still, recent numbers are even more alarming. According to the Palestinian Prisoner’s Society, more than 19,000 Palestinians have been detained in the West Bank and Jerusalem since October 2023. From Gaza, numbers remain deliberately obscured with only 2,662 detainees officially acknowledged as “unlawful combatants” – a fraction of the actual number. At least 77 Palestinians have died in Israeli custody since October 2023, including 46 from Gaza.

This is how Amnesty reproduces the asymmetry of global discourse: mourning individual Israeli lives while Palestinians are reduced to approximate numbers and statistics.

Vienna protests: pro-Palestinian students assaulted and threatened
Amnesty’s hypocrisy is not only in statements. On August 5,students organized a protest in Vienna, against what they described to as the “opportunism and complicity” of Western non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and political parties in Israel’s ongoing genocide. According to the organizers, who spoke to Al-Akhbar on condition of anonymity, members of Amnesty Austria, the anti-genocide Jewish organization Standing Together, and the Communist Party of Austria (KPÖ) assaulted demonstrators. Protesters even reported physical assaults, threats, and cases of sexual harassment by individuals affiliated with these groups.

The same organization that campaigns for freedom of expression and peaceful assembly was involved – whether directly or indirectly – in suppressing Palestinian solidarity activists. The violence was ignored by mainstream media, underscoring the politics that shape the humanitarian sector and the behavior of its actors: Palestinians are silenced, marginalised and policed, while international organizations and NGOs in general posture as saviors and even guardians of human rights, but only in contexts that do not challenge Israel and its allies.

The release of this statement following Trump’s announcements and a few days before October 7, 2025 is not only an example of how International “humanitarian” organizations bend under Zionist pressure. It is also about sanitizing settler colonialism, forced displacement, mass killing, and collective punishment, through a so-called “balanced” framing of atrocities. The whole humanitarian sector has been benefiting from the “October 7 Industry”. For instance, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released its own heavily publicized report, feeding into the dominant narrative that fixates on “Israeli suffering” while disregarding and/or delaying the acknowledgment of the genocide, the occupation, and the endless atrocities committed by the zionist entity and its settlers. It is a way to contextualize, hedge, and sanitize Israeli crimes, ensuring every act of resistance is spotlighted in full exaggerated, misleading and demonized detail.

(al-akhbar)

https://orinocotribune.com/amnesty-righ ... mes-again/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Oct 10, 2025 3:07 pm

Israeli troops withdraw from parts of Gaza ahead of expected prisoner swap
Palestinians returned to their homes to witness unprecedented amounts of destruction caused by Israel

News Desk

OCT 10, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Bloomberg)

Israeli forces have begun partially withdrawing from certain areas in Gaza ahead of a prisoner exchange, which is expected to take place within the next 72 hours.

Ongoing withdrawal operations of the Israeli occupation forces in Gaza. pic.twitter.com/qh6LI0jsJz

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) October 10, 2025


Troops are withdrawing in line with the agreement’s map. As part of the first withdrawal, the Israeli army is leaving Gaza’s population centers in advance of a prisoner exchange, which is slated to take place next week, according to US President Donald Trump.

The map does not envision a full Israeli withdrawal, with the final stage being a pullout towards the Gaza border, where a buffer zone would be established.

“Over the next 24 hours, the Israeli army will complete its withdrawal from certain areas inside the Gaza Strip to the yellow line, as agreed in the Trump plan between Israel and Hamas. The forces are expected to withdraw eastward from Rafah and Khan Yunis (south) and from areas north of the Gaza Strip and approach the border with the State of Israel,” said Israel’s Channel 12.

Israeli Army Radio said the first withdrawal will be complete by the afternoon of 10 October. The army started withdrawing on Thursday morning.

Residents of Gaza are heading back to the north following Israel’s partial withdrawal. pic.twitter.com/4wPk2XH1X9

— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) October 10, 2025
Residents of the southern city of Khan Yunis and other areas started returning to their homes, shocked by the unprecedented level of destruction caused by Israel.

🚨BREAKING : Thousands of civilians are pouring onto Al-Rashid Street toward Gaza City from central Gaza following the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the reopening of the road.
Image
— Gaza Notifications (@gazanotice) October 10, 2025


As troops carried out the withdrawal on Friday, Palestinians continued to come under Israeli attacks.

Five Palestinians were injured in an Israeli strike on a school-turned-shelter. Israeli forces also shelled areas northwest of Nuseirat camp in central Gaza.

The day before, dozens of Palestinians – at least 73 – were killed and injured in a strike on a home in western Gaza. Reports say the attack was an assassination attempt.

“The mission in Gaza is not over yet,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on 9 October.

Israeli troops are withdrawing in order to make way for the prisoner exchange. However, no agreement has been reached yet on the list of Palestinian prisoners.

Hebrew reports said Israel has made last-minute changes to the lists, including removing the names of Fatah-linked prisoners and replacing them with Hamas-linked prisoners.

The Palestinian Prisoners Office accused Tel Aviv of obstructing the deal.

“As of now, no agreement has been reached regarding the lists of prisoners, and the circulating lists concerning the prisoners intended for release as part of the exchange deal are inaccurate lists. The occupation is promoting these lists with the aim of pressuring and disrupting the course of negotiations. Official lists, if an agreement is reached, will be announced and published through the platforms of the Prisoner's Media Office.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-t ... soner-swap

No evacuation for Palestinian gangs collaborating with Israel in Gaza: Report

With a ceasefire in effect, ISIS-linked smuggler Yasser Abu Shabab and his militia face an uncertain future for collaborating with Israel during the genocide

News Desk

OCT 9, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: X)

Palestinian collaborator with Israel and Wall Street Journal columnist Yasser Abu Shabab and his “Popular Forces” will stay in Gaza following the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, according to a report by Israel Hayom on 9 October.

The Hebrew news outlet noted that Abu Shabab's militia is deployed in areas that will not be evacuated by the Israeli army in the first phase of the ceasefire agreement, allowing the group to enjoy further Israeli protection, at least temporarily.

The Popular Forces established a base under Israeli guidance in the area east of the destroyed city of Rafah on the Gaza border with Egypt.

This area is far behind the "yellow line," to which Israeli troops must withdraw, according to the map detailing US President Donald Trump's ceasefire plan.

Abu Shabab's men are also behind the "red line" of withdrawal, up to which an international force will allegedly be deployed. Areas occupied by the group in the destroyed cities of Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun, and eastern Khan Yunis, are also behind the yellow line.

In early 2024, as Israel was imposing its starvation siege on Gaza, Israeli intelligence armed and funded Abu Shabab's militia, tasking them with attacking and looting convoys carrying humanitarian aid into Gaza, including from the UN.

Israeli officials then blamed the attacks and chaos on Hamas, using the excuse to seize control of aid distribution in Gaza via the deadly Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

Abu Shabab was arrested by Hamas in 2015 and sentenced to 25 years in prison on charges of drug trafficking and theft.

He escaped in October 2023 after Israeli airstrikes hit the prison where he was being held. Leaders of Abu Shabab’s Tarabin clan publicly disowned him and have called for his killing for collaborating with Israel.

Hossam al-Astal, the Popular Forces commander in eastern Khan Yunis, claimed the group would remain in Gaza, while Hamas would be forced to leave.

"The Hamas dogs will not be happy, we exist and they are (the ones) leaving," Astal claimed.

On the other hand, a security source in the Ministry of Interior in Gaza told Quds Press on Thursday that members of Abu Shabab's militia fear being prosecuted after the genocide ends.

The source said members of the group have recently begun communicating with several families and tribal leaders, in hopes of opening indirect channels with the Ministry of Interior to resolve their legal and tribal status and ensure they are not subject to prosecution.

The source explained that this communication took place in secrecy, via intermediaries from local and tribal leaders, who relayed messages between the police leadership in Gaza and the militia members who wished to settle their status.

A specific mechanism was agreed upon for them to surrender and stand trial, while ensuring the confidentiality of the proceedings, the source added.

Sources also revealed to Quds Press that Abu Shabab's group had helped Israeli forces arrest Dr. Marwan al-Hams, the director general of field hospitals, from a medical facility in Rafah about two months ago.

The sources said that additional information regarding the militia's crimes would be revealed “in the coming days.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/no-evacua ... aza-report

Dozens arrested in Lebanon on suspicion of collaborating with Israel

Most of the arrests happened following the one-sided ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel

News Desk

OCT 9, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: The Cradle)

Lebanese authorities in the past months have detained 32 people accused of collaborating with Israel and providing intelligence used in strikes against Hezbollah, a judicial official told AFP on 9 October.

The official, speaking anonymously, said six arrests were made before the November ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, while nine of the accused have already faced trial in the military court, and the remaining 23 suspects are still under investigation.

According to the same source, those arrested are accused of supplying Israel with information on Hezbollah’s movements and infrastructure, enabling direct strikes on the resistance group’s senior commanders and weapons sites.

Lebanon remains technically at war with Israel despite the nominal ceasefire agreement back in November 2024, and any contact with the enemy is punishable by imprisonment.

A second judicial official familiar with the investigation confirmed that two of the convicted individuals were sentenced to eight and seven years of hard labor.

The court found them guilty of “providing the enemy with coordinates, addresses, and names of Hezbollah officials, knowing that the enemy would use this information to bomb locations where the group’s officials and leaders were located.”

The arrests come after more than a year of Israeli ceasefire violations and hostilities, including two months of open war, during which Israel launched extensive strikes targeting the Lebanese resistance.

Despite the truce signed in November, Israeli attacks have continued unabated, with thousands of strikes and hundreds of Lebanese civilians killed.

In September last year, thousands of Hezbollah pagers and walkie-talkies exploded in a coordinated Israeli operation that crippled the group’s communications network. Lebanon reported 39 people killed, and thousands were wounded.

A week later, Israel carried out a massive airstrike on Beirut’s southern suburbs that killed Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, marking one of the most significant escalations in the confrontation between the two sides.

The arrests come as part of broader regional intelligence tensions, following the release of Israeli-Russian researcher Elizabeth Tsurkov in Baghdad in September.

Sources close to the Iraqi government told AFP that Tsurkov, a former Israeli military intelligence officer, was freed under “pressure” on her captors rather than through a prisoner exchange.

Earlier reports claiming Israel had released Iraqi, Iranian, and Lebanese detainees, including maritime captain Imad Amhaz, who was abducted from the coastal city of Batroun in Lebanon – were denied by officials in both Beirut and Baghdad.

Although some outlets reported that Amhaz was freed as part of a deal, neither Hezbollah nor his family has confirmed his release, and his fate remains uncertain.

While in captivity, Tsurkov, who entered Iraq illegally using a Russian passport, appeared in a video acknowledging links to Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

In a video taken during her captivity, Israeli Elizabeth Tsurkov, kidnapped in Iraq 7 months ago, says she was a Mossad operative tasked to establish ties with the SDF in Syria, and to sow intra-Shia strife in Iraq. pic.twitter.com/HDo9MxVYkx

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) November 13, 2023


https://thecradle.co/articles/dozens-ar ... ith-israel

*****

Image

Samantha Power secretly colluded with Israel to enhance UN role, leaked emails show
Wyatt Reed·October 9, 2025

Behind closed doors, the noted ‘humanitarian interventionist’ successfully lobbied for Israel’s inclusion on important UN committees even after the Human Rights Council accused it of targeting civilians in Gaza.

The leaked emails also reveal that Israel furnished Power with a dodgy dossier on Syrian chemical weapons as she pushed regime change in Damascus.
Former US ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power secretly coordinated with a top Israeli diplomat to secure Israel’s access to multiple prestigious UN committees, leaked files show.

Several unsolicited emails sent by Power to the then ambassador of Israel to the UN, Ron Prosor, show the diplomat celebrating her role in polishing Israel’s image on the global stage.

The emails between the two diplomats reveal how the US-Israeli special relationship operates at a granular level, and help map out the personal interactions which ensure Israel enjoys constant diplomatic cover at an international level. They are among the latest batch of hacked files belonging to Israeli government officials which were leaked by the Handala hacking collective.

A November 2013 email exchange between Power and Prosor reveals how the US ambassador helped secure Israel entry to the UN’s Western European and Others Group (WEOG). Three days before the vote succeeded, Prosor predicted “a Hanukkah miracle,” telling Power, “I know what [a] crucial role you played in making this happen. This success will last way beyond our time and will always carry your figure [sic] print on it.”

Power replied by thanking him for sending “such a nice note,” and agreed that Israel’s ascension to WEOG was “so overdue and so ridiculous that it has taken this long.”

Image

When Tel Aviv was accepted into WEOG days later, the pro-Israel Jewish Virtual Library hailed the vote as “an important move that allows Israel to join WEOG meetings in Geneva and exert some influence on the Human Rights Council.”

On October 29, 2015, two weeks after Prosor stepped down from his role as Israeli ambassador to the UN, Power boasted to her former colleague that she had gotten Israel onto another UN body — “our last plot,” as she described it.

“117-1 vote today for Israel to get into copuos!” Power wrote, referring to Tel Aviv’s entrance to the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. She described the achievement as “HUGE!!” In the subject line, Power told Prosor she had led the push “in your honor.” A day later, Prosor emailed back, telling Power: “I am so happy that with your unwavering support we got it through the UN system.”

Image

“Big hug from the holy land,” Prosor continued, telling Power: “You have to come and visit.” He urged Power to call him on his private cell phone, writing, “i have a nice academic venue that will trigger your visit.”

Power was evidently rewarded with an invitation to a lucrative speaking gig in Israel. The next February, she appeared in Tel Aviv as a featured speaker at the national model UN conference, where she promptly blasted the UN for its supposed anti-Israel bias. “Bias has extended well beyond Israel as a country, Israel as an idea,” she claimed, complaining, “Israel is just not treated like other countries.”

Israel tailored a Syrian chemical weapons dossier for Power’s “non-technical brain”
Power used her platform at the UN to thunder for military intervention in Syria, frequently exploiting the US-backed opposition’s questionable claims of chemical attacks to make her case. And from almost the moment she entered her position, Israel was feeding her cooked intelligence apparently alleging that Syria held a vast arsenal of WMD’s.

An email chain beginning on Sept. 12, 2013 – just one month into Power’s UN tenure – suggests Prosor instrumentalized his American counterpart as a conduit for Israel’s dubious intelligence on Syrian chemical weapons. “I wanted to let you know that today we have transferred… technical information” to the US side, he wrote to Power, adding, “I know it is of significant value in dealing with the Syrian chemical arsenal.”

Prosor noted that he also distributed the report to Thomas Countryman, then the State Department’s top official in charge of non-proliferation.

Image

Two days prior, Power appeared to thank Prosor for presenting her with a dumbed-down intelligence dossier. “For my non-technical brain, this is extremely helpful,” she wrote. “I know that these options are being worked aggressively,” she continued, hinting at potential sanctions and military tactics being pursued by the Obama administration.

Image

A momentary rift over the Iran deal
One missive from Prosor to Power hints at the extent to which Israel came to rely on US backing at the UN. On February 13, 2014 — one day before Israel’s ever-expanding settlements were heavily criticized during a closed-door briefing by UN Security Council members, — a seemingly perturbed Prosor reached out to Washington’s representative in New York.

“Hi Samantha, I have been trying to reach you for a couple of days now. I would really appreciate if you can call me back as soon as you can.” It’s unclear whether Power responded to the email.

The email, which coincided with a lull in communication between the pair, suggests ties may have frayed slightly amid efforts by the Obama administration to achieve a nuclear deal with Iran — a prospect which Tel Aviv loudly and publicly opposed well before the terms of the bargain had even been decided upon.

Another email sent during Israel’s July 2014 Gaza invasion shows Prosor sent Power a report disparaging her boss, then Secretary of State John Kerry. That article was an analysis published by Israel’s liberal Haaretz daily which was headlined, “Reckless Kerry Risks Causing Escalation.” It blamed Kerry for having “forced [Israel] to undertake an expanded ground operation” in Gaza. Prosor declared the essay “worth reading,” telling Power it was written by an author “who is branded as ‘leftist’ in Israel, the kind you like.”

Image

But the next year, with that war over, and negotiations with Tehran wrapping up in June, Power was back to business as usual with the Israelis.

Whitewashing Israel’s atrocities against civilians, including children
One email forwarded by Power to Prosor on June 8, 2015, which was clearly intended to convey reassurance to Israeli diplomats, was originally written by a State Department official. Describing an upcoming UN report on Children and Armed Conflict, the US functionary confirmed that the Israeli military had not “been listed in the annex of the report” despite its well-documented abuses and rampant killings of minors in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Image

One week later, career US ambassador Michele Sison issued a personal invitation to Prosor: “We are having a special event next Tuesday — the kind of event that is unique to New York — and Ambassador Power and I hope you can join us.” The American diplomats requested Prosor take part in a panel discussion there, with Sison insisting, “Ambassador Power… and I would be honored if you could participate.”

Image

Elsewhere, Prosor urges Power to personally lobby the head of the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) in order to secure a coveted position for an Israeli, who he claims was “only [kept] from getting the job” due to his “nationality.”

“I know you are sensitive to the discrimination at large towards Israel and specifically at this organization thus I ask you to personally speak with UNFPA Executive Director, Babatunde, and convey US support,” Prosor explains. “Dr. Babatubde [sic] knows [the candidate] and his work personally but needs support to reach the right decision,” he continues.

Image

Power’s complicity in Gaza genocide spurs staff revolt
After working for much of the ’90s as a Soros-funded journalist in post-communist states, Power shot to fame upon publishing a book called “America and the Age of Genocide,” which hammered State Department leadership in the Bill Clinton administration for not taking more forceful action to intervene in the Rwandan civil conflict. During Obama’s second term, she enlisted Rabbi Shmuley Boteach as her personal liaison to the Zionist lobby, whose support she required to to secure the position of UN Ambassador, as documented in a Foreign Policy article headlined “How Michael Jackson’s Rabbi Made Samantha Power Kosher.”

Image

Most recently, Power served as the director of USAID under President Joe Biden. As Israel’s genocide in Gaza unfolded, she faced a growing wave of dissension from staffers in the organization. During a stormy meeting in February 2024, current and former USAID staffers confronted Power over her support for Israel’s assault on Gaza, and refusal to push for a ceasefire. Several staffers expressed outrage that Power had apparently covered up Israel’s killing of a USAID staffer inside Gaza in November 2023, according to the Washington Post. She pushed back by deploying debunked Israeli propaganda accusing Hamas of “sexual assault” on October 7.

Since leaving her office at the helm of USAID, Power has attempted to distance herself from Israel’s ongoing war crimes, and has criticized Israel for failing to provide sufficient aid to Palestinians. In January of 2025, Power offered up her best Oscar Schindler impersonation and complained, “I wish we could have ended the war in Gaza far sooner… and done more to end this hell that the people of Gaza have experienced.”

But the emails show that, even after the UN Human Rights Council publicly accused Israel of deliberately targeting children when it killed over 2,000 Palestinians during its last attack on Gaza in 2014, Power played a secret but seminal role in furthering Israel’s influence on the world stage while shielding it from accountability for its documented atrocities.

A 2015 message shows that Power organized a going-away party for Israel’s ambassador prior to his retirement. An email from David Harris, the longtime leader of the American Jewish Committee, referred explicitly to a “luncheon hosted by Amb. Samantha Power in [his] honor.”

https://thegrayzone.com/2025/10/09/sam- ... ommittees/

(Surprised they didn't give the Peace Prize to her.)

******

Jonathan Cook: I Grieve
October 9, 2025

Politicians, the police and the media want millions of us to imagine we are alone in grieving the slaughter of Gaza’s children — and that our grief is shameful. They need us to succumb to their lies.

Image
A Palestinian man mourns his family members who were killed in the Israeli bombing of the Nuseirat refugee camp, Gaza Strip, Aug. 10, 2024. (UNRWA /Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0)

By Jonathan Cook
Jonathan-Cook.net

Members of the Jewish community have been grieving for three days now over the killing of two innocent people in last week’s attack on a Manchester synagogue. Politicians and the media keep telling us how important it is to respect their grief.

I and millions of other Britons, some of them Jews, have been grieving for much longer — over the killing of tens of children in Gaza not on one day last week but on every single day, without break, for two years. And yet no politicians or media seem to think it important to respect my grief.

I grieve over much more than a death toll that now runs into many tens of thousands of children.

I grieve over my government’s active complicity in providing the weapons and intelligence that made possible the mass slaughter in Gaza.

I grieve over my government’s refusal to oppose the abduction of British citizens trying to reach Gaza and bring food to the population Israel is starving. And I grieve at my government’s refusal to mount an official flotilla of its own, a naval one, to break Israel’s illegal siege of the enclave and end the famine it has engineered there.

I grieve over the relentless erosion of the public’s right to protest the slaughter and starvation in Gaza.

I grieve over the designation of any practical effort to stop the slaughter as “terrorism.”

I grieve over the condemnation by politicians and the media of my grief as “anti-Semitism.”

I grieve for the death of my last illusions. The illusion that a civilised society treats all life as precious. The illusion that a civilised society learns from history, so that it stops recycling history’s worst atrocities. The illusion that our society is civilised.

I grieve knowing that no one in power is coming to console me in my grief. Not the police. Not the politicians. Not the media.

I grieve knowing that, in truth, they will vilify me, they will legislate against me, and one day they will arrest me.

They want me and millions of other Britons to imagine we are alone in our grief, and that our grief is shameful. They need us to succumb to their lies.

But we must never forget. We are many. And it is they, not us, who are the monsters.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/09/j ... -i-grieve/

******

Image

Thoughts On The Ceasefire News

When normal people get a ceasefire agreement they think “Good, this means we can finally stop fighting and killing.” Whenever Israelis get a ceasefire agreement they go, “This means we have to hurry up and kill as many people as possible before it takes effect.”

Caitlin Johnstone
October 10, 2025

Israel continued to hammer Gaza with military explosives on Thursday despite the announcement of the first stages of a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.

Israel always does this. When normal people get a ceasefire agreement they think “Good, this means we can finally stop fighting and killing.” Whenever Israelis get a ceasefire agreement they go, “This means we have to hurry up and kill as many people as possible before it takes effect.”

But it does appear that the killing and abuse will at least diminish for a time, which is an objectively good thing no matter how you slice it.

The first stages of the agreement reportedly entail a partial withdrawal of IDF troops, Israel’s starvation blockade officially ending, humanitarian aid being allowed into the enclave, and both Israel and Hamas releasing captives and stopping the fighting.

Drop Site News reports that according to Hamas sources, subsequent ceasefire phases will entail “No surrender, no disarming, no mass exile, but most of all a permanent end to the war.”

It remains to be seen if there will be any movement toward a lasting ceasefire beyond the first stage. When an agreement was reached late last year it never made it beyond the first phase and then the Trumpanyahu administration declared a siege and resumed the killing.

The far right members of the Netanyahu regime certainly seem like they don’t expect the ceasefire to hold.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said in a statement that Israel has a “tremendous responsibility to ensure that this is not, God forbid, a deal of ‘hostages in exchange for stopping the war,’ as Hamas thinks and boasts,” and that “immediately after the hostages return home, the State of Israel will continue to strive with all its might for the true eradication of Hamas and the genuine disarmament of Gaza.”

Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir issued similar remarks, saying that he and his Jewish Power party will use their leverage to dismantle the Netanyahu government if it “allows the continued existence of Hamas rule in Gaza.”

Netanyahu himself has been studiously avoiding any talk of commitment to a lasting ceasefire, mostly limiting his public statements to the significance of freeing Israeli hostages.

So there’s not a whole lot to feel optimistic about here. If the killing does stop on a lasting basis, it will be a pleasant surprise.

If it does, we can only surmise that the US and Israel calculated that the worldwide PR crisis created by the genocide was getting too severe to sustain, which would be a win for all of us. Trump has gone on record to say that “Bibi took it very far and Israel lost a lot of support in the world. Now I am gonna get all that support back.”

Either that, or they calculated that they’re going to need all their firepower for a planned war with Iran. Which would of course be terrible for everyone.

We shall see. For now at least it will be nice for everyone to have a breather. If things really do calm down I’m going to do something I’ve never done in my entire writing career and try to take a full weekend off work to decompress. Focusing on a live-streamed genocide for two years takes a toll on the mind and body.

Here’s hoping for a better future.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2025/10 ... fire-news/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14394
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Oct 11, 2025 3:22 pm

The Eighth Front: Israel’s digital Iron Dome and the narrative battle

As its military bombs Gaza, despite agreeing to a ceasefire, Tel Aviv launches a parallel online offensive aimed at silencing resistance narratives, manipulating global perceptions, and re-engineering the digital memory of its war crimes.


Mohamad Hasan Sweidan

OCT 10, 2025

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described the “Eighth Front” of his war as the battle over truth. “Seven fronts against Iran and its proxies. The eighth: the battle for the truth,” he said during a ceremony hosted by US network Newsmax at Jerusalem’s Waldorf Astoria hotel.

Its aim is to refute accusations of genocide and deliberate famine linked to Israel’s two-year-long war on the strip, with social media and artificial intelligence (AI) programs serving as the most important battlegrounds on this front.

Digital Iron Dome

In the wake of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October 2023, Israel's so-called “Digital Iron Dome” was activated to intercept digital content just as its military dome intercepts missiles. But instead of shrapnel, the targets are ideas – posts, images, videos – that expose Israel's atrocities in the besieged enclave.

This digital dome operates on two main layers. First is the volunteer-driven reporting system: a nationwide campaign in which users flood social media platforms with mass complaints against content deemed unfavorable to Israel. A hybrid of AI and human reviewers rapidly classifies flagged posts, then pushes takedown requests to platforms like Meta, TikTok, and X. The goal is speed – to kill the narrative before it spreads.

TikTok alone deleted 3.1 million videos and cut off 140,000 live streams in the first six months of Israel's genocide in Gaza. The Israeli Attorney General’s Cyber Unit filed nearly 9,500 takedown requests during the same period, with Meta allegedly complying 94 percent of the time.

The second layer is algorithmic warfare: AI systems scan over 200,000 websites to identify dissenting narratives, then bombard exposed users with paid pro-Israel content in real time. Using ad campaigns that mimic the look and timing of organic posts, Israel floods timelines with a manufactured counter-narrative.

This dual strategy aims to overwhelm and erase. The first suppresses the spread of resistance voices. The second replaces them with state-approved fabrications.

Weaponizing social media for war

“We’re all the targets of these wars. We’re the ones whose clicks decide whose side wins out.”

– Peter Singer, co-author of LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media


On 26 September 2025, Netanyahu met with 18 US-based social media influencers. The directive was to flood TikTok, X, YouTube, and podcasts with pro-Israel messaging. A week later, Tel Aviv allocated $145 million to its largest-ever digital propaganda campaign, dubbed “Project 545.” The campaign targets US public opinion, especially Gen Z, with AI-assisted content tailored for TikTok and Instagram.

Documents from the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) reveal that the Israeli Foreign Ministry contracted with Clock Tower, a firm headed by US President Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Brad Parscale. The aim is to influence both public discourse and the responses generated by AI platforms like ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini.

In parallel, the “Esther Project” was launched to bankroll US influencers with contracts reportedly reaching $900,000 per person. These influencers are expected to post 25–30 times a month, creating a constant stream of pro-Israel content. Between June and November 2024, at least $900,000 in campaign payments were distributed to 14–18 influencers, with payments averaging $6,100–7,300 per post.

Bridge Partners, a company contracted with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, sent a series of invoices for the costs of the campaign of pro-Israel “influencers” to the international media group “Havas Media Group” in Germany, which works for Israel.

Show Faith by Works, a new company established in July 2025, received $325,000 in just two months to promote Israeli propaganda among Christian communities in the US and west. With plans to spend as much as $4.1 million on the campaign, it has been billed as the “largest Christian Church Geofencing Campaign in US history.” Meanwhile, the Israeli Foreign Ministry injected an additional $137 million into global perception-shaping campaigns, on top of regular image-boosting programs.

These initiatives form part of a larger strategy often referred to as “hasbara” – a Hebrew term for Israel’s public diplomacy and propaganda efforts. In the digital era, hasbara has evolved from conventional media narratives into sophisticated AI-assisted influence operations designed to dominate and distort online discourse.

A report by Spain’s public broadcaster RTVE, citing an investigation by Eurovision News Spotlight, revealed that the Israeli government allocated roughly $50 million in ad spending across Google, X, and French-Israeli ad networks Outbrain and Teads.

The aim, according to the investigation, was to counter global reporting on the famine in Gaza by portraying a facade of normalcy. From January to early September 2025, Tel Aviv placed more than 4,000 digital ads – half of them targeting international audiences. These ads presented a sanitized Gaza, free of rubble and starvation.

Digitally laundering war crimes

The online war does not stop at public platforms. In May 2024, OpenAI revealed that it had dismantled five covert “influence operations” exploiting its tools – one of which was run by the Israeli company STOIC. The firm used large language models to generate pro-Israel content and anti-Hamas messaging tailored for US audiences, then deployed them via fake accounts across Facebook, X, and Instagram.

The New York Times (NYT) reported a parallel Israeli government operation that used nearly 600 fake accounts to flood the feeds of 128 US lawmakers with over 2,000 curated comments per week. These messages defended Israeli actions and smeared Palestinian institutions and the leading humanitarian aid provider in Gaza, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

Last year, UNRWA spokesperson Juliette Touma was quoted as saying:

“These ads are destructive to people. They should stop, and those responsible for this sabotage should be held accountable. There should be a lot of follow-up with companies like Google once the war is over. There’s a lot to answer to.”

Through these methods, Tel Aviv seeks to pre-empt and overwrite opposition narratives at the very moment they appear. The result is a digital space saturated with state propaganda – a timeline engineered to forget.

Exporting repression

The global danger lies in the model set by this precedent. When a colonial military power facing credible accusations of genocide can use digital tools to rewrite the record in real time, it sends a clear signal that anyone with the money and tech can do the same.

Israel’s system is simple but devastatingly effective: mass reporting to silence dissent, targeted ads to manipulate perception, influencer contracts to manufacture consent, and AI tools to distort the truth.

If this model spreads, resistance voices worldwide – from students to journalists to indigenous movements – will find their truths buried under a paid avalanche of state propaganda.

Tel Aviv may have pioneered this digital occupation of truth. But it won’t be the last to deploy it against those fighting for justice.

https://thecradle.co/articles/the-eight ... ive-battle

Hamas will only disarm if fighters integrated into Palestinian National Army: Official

Netanyahu has said that Hamas must disarm the 'easy way or the hard way' following the Gaza ceasefire deal

News Desk

OCT 11, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AFP)

During an interview with Sky News on 10 October, senior Hamas official Dr. Basem Naim confirmed that Hamas would not completely disarm and that the movement would only hand over its weapons to a Palestinian state and integrate its fighters into a Palestinian national army.

"No one has the right to deny us the right to resist the occupation of armies," Naim said.

JUST IN: Hamas leader Basem Naim to Sky News:

Our weapons are going to be handed over only to the hands of a Palestinian State, and our fighters can be integrated into the Palestinian National Army.

Before that, no one has the right to deny us the right to resist the occupation… pic.twitter.com/QSFT8Ii5am

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) October 10, 2025


As the ceasefire took effect on Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed that Israel might restart the genocide if Hamas does not give up its weapons.

"Hamas will be disarmed and Gaza will be demilitarized … If this is achieved the easy way, so much the better. And if not, it will be achieved the hard way," Netanyahu stated in a televised address.

The prime minister is under pressure from Jewish supremacists ministers in his cabinet who insist on continuing the war to ethnically cleanse Gaza and annex it for the sake of building Jewish settlements.

During Friday's interview, Naim thanked US President Donald Trump, saying the ceasefire would not have been possible without the pressure he applied to Netanyahu.

"Without the personal interference of President Trump in this case, I don't think that it would have happened to have reached the end of the war," Naim stated.

"Therefore, yes, we thank President Trump and his personal efforts to interfere and to pressure Israel to bring an end to this massacre and slaughtering."

But Naim insisted that Trump must continue to apply pressure on Israel to honor the ceasefire agreement moving forward.

Hamas is scheduled to release the remaining 46 Israeli captives it holds in Gaza by Monday, including 20 still alive, after a 72-hour deadline.

"We believe and we hope that President Trump will continue to interfere personally and to exercise the maximum pressure on [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu to fulfil its obligation," Naim explained.

"We have already seen Netanyahu speaking to the media, threatening to go to war again if this doesn't happen, if that doesn't happen."

The top Hamas official also warned that the movement rejects any role for former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in administering post-war Gaza.

Naim cited Blair's role in helping US President George Bush and Israel-first members of his administration launch wars against Afghanistan and Iraq in 2001 and 2003, which killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims.

"We can still remember him very well after destroying Iraq and Afghanistan," Naim explained.

Under Trump's ceasefire plan, Blair is seeking to lead an international supervisory body to administer Gaza on Israel's behalf.

Senior Hamas official Dr Basem Naim has exclusively told @SkyYaldaHakim that Hamas would step aside to allow a Palestinian body to govern a post-war Gaza.

But he warned that former UK Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair would not be welcome in any post-war role for Gaza. pic.twitter.com/Di3n3OwZkh

— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 10, 2025


https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-wil ... y-official

GHF dismantles Gaza sites where thousands of Palestinian aid seekers killed

Starving Palestinians were attacked by Israeli troops and US mercenaries on a daily basis as they were trying to receive aid

News Desk

OCT 10, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

The US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has begun to dismantle after killing thousands of Palestinians in the past months during a failed mission worth tens of millions.

GHF began “dismantling their sites in the Netzarim Corridor in Gaza,” eyewitnesses told Quds News Network (QNN) on 9 October.


Video footage circulating on social media showed bulldozers working near one of the GHF sites in Gaza.


The news comes as a ceasefire deal has gone into effect, ending the two-year Israeli genocide against Palestinians, which unfolded after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in October 2023.

As part of the 20-point Trump plan announced last month, GHF’s mission will come to an end, and the UN and other international aid organizations will resume humanitarian aid deliveries across the strip.

Around 3,000 Palestinians have been killed since GHF was established in May in an effort to bypass the UN, which, along with other organizations, refused to take part in the plan for ethical reasons.

GHF failed to deliver adequate amounts of aid to starving Palestinians. For months, aid seekers were shot dead by Israeli troops on a near-daily basis as they approached the sites, which were run by US security contractors under extremely unorganized conditions.

The US mercenaries also contributed to the violence, according to multiple testimonies from anonymous contractors.

Washington provided $30 million in direct funding for the deadly aid scheme, which was frequently referred to as a “death trap.” GHF said it received a $100-million commitment from an unnamed foreign government donor. Reports from earlier this year also claimed Israel allocated about $280 million to GHF.

As the ceasefire took effect, thousands of Palestinians returned to their homes in different parts of Gaza, witnessing unprecedented destruction caused by Israel.

The Israeli army has withdrawn from the strip’s population centers ahead of a prisoner exchange expected in the next 72 hours.

Many of the ceasefire agreement’s details remain unclear, as Hamas has rejected Israel’s term that it must disarm.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to resume the war if his demands are not met.

https://thecradle.co/articles/ghf-disma ... ers-killed

*****

Patrick Lawrence: Keep the Champagne Corked
October 10, 2025

We must allow for the possibility of success of Trump’s 20-point peace plan in Gaza, of course. But at writing I simply cannot see it.


Image
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Sept. 29 during a phone call with Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani about the U.S. peace plan for Gaza. (White House / Daniel Torok)

By Patrick Lawrence
The Floutist

As I read of the ceasefire Israel and the Hamas government in Gaza formally accepted in the early hours of Thursday, my mind went immediately to that memorable thought Hannah Arendt shared with Roger Errera, a French free-speech advocate, shortly before her death in 1975:

“If everybody always lies to you, the consequence is not that you believe the lies, but rather that nobody believes anything any longer.”

How, I mean to say, can one possibly take Bibi Netanyahu at his word as he commits to putting into force the 20–point peace plan the Israeli prime minister and President Donald Trump made public with flimsy fanfare at the White House late last month? With bottomless cynicism and treachery, the Zionist regime has broken every ceasefire accord to which it has agreed for the past two decades, if not longer.

Noam Chomsky on this topic, in a video recorded earlier and posted Thursday on “X”:

“Starting in November 2005 an agreement was reached between Israel and the Palestinian Authority then, not Hamas. Israel completely rejected it, and Hamas lived up to it, not a single rocket. Then came the January [2006] election [which Hamas won], and Israel intensified its attack with U.S. support. After that there were repeated attacks and ceasefire agreements.

Every ceasefire agreement is approximately like what I’ve read. Israel completely dismisses and disregards it and maintains the siege in violation of the ceasefire and increases the violence. Hamas lives up to it, and Israel officially accepts that, agrees to it, until some escalation of Israeli violence leads to Hamas reaction, and then another episode of ‘mowing the lawn.’ That’s been going on since November 2005.”


As I was considering this well-established pattern Thursday morning, I saw other videos on “X” that showed Palestinian children dancing for joy amid the rubble to which the Zionist terror machine has reduced their homes in Gaza.

Hope, I reflected, is the cruelest of the three cardinal virtues. How often — in our responses to events, in our professions, in love and in other personal relations — does it turn out to betray us. I hope, for all of our sakes but especially for the sake of those children and their parents, siblings, aunts, uncles, and all others who have suffered with them these past two years — well, these past 77 — that the accord going into effect as I write this holds.

We must allow for the possibility of success, of course. But at writing I simply cannot see it.

As Thursday morning went on, Hamas prepared to release the remaining hostages it has held since the events of Oct. 7, 2023 — 22 of them alive by Israel’s count, the bodies of 26 others — and the Israelis were (reportedly) arranging for the release of 250 Palestinians serving life sentences in Israel’s prison gulag and 1,700 others taken captive since Oct. 7 of two years ago. This is the first phase of the 20–point Gaza Peace Plan Trump and Netanyahu announced on Sept. 29. In the next phase the Israeli Occupation Forces are to withdraw from Gaza to a perimeter along its inland edge but still inside the Strip.

What is our question? Will Israel hold to this accord, or at what point will the Zionists betray it? Let me suggest my view this way: I am not dancing in the streets of the once-was factory town wherein I currently reside, and I do not see much dancing in London, Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Berlin, Rome, Genoa, Madrid, Zaragoza, Athens, or any of the other big cities where hundreds of thousands have lately been demonstrating in behalf of the Palestinian cause.

Tariq Kenney–Shawa, an analyst with the Palestinian research network Al Shabaka, put it this way on X:

“Some telling Israeli analysis that makes it clear that they don’t see this as much of a ceasefire, but rather a tactical pause through which to secure the release of hostages before retaining control of most of Gaza and implementing the ‘Lebanon model’ of continued bombings.”

History, as just reviewed, suggests this is so. There is simply no believing what the Zionists say about anything under the sun at this point. Does one, after all, ever take fanatics at their word? Ever given to rank opportunism in the cause of their rank ideology, Zionist Jews— which excludes very many right-thinking Jews — have long since sunk their own ship by way of credibility.

Events & Politics Don’t Line Up

More immediately to the point, events and politics do not line up on the side of the peace plan’s efficacy. The I.O.F. redoubled its aerial attacks on Gaza immediately after Bibi and Trump announced their “peace plan” early last week. There is video circulating on “X” as we speak showing Israeli tanks shelling the exposed population of neighborhoods in central Gaza hard by the Mediterranean beaches.

There is simply no on-the-ground indication of commitment to anything other than the no-commitment that has long defined what I refuse to call statecraft on the Israelis’ part.

What has stayed with me these past 10 days is the balance inside Netanyahu’s freak-show cabinet. Ben–Gvir, Smotrich, the crazed Orit Strook, et al.: These grotesques continue to insist that Gaza must be ethnic-cleansed at a minimum, and for them it is on up from there to the annihilation of all Palestinians. Netanyahu needs these people for his political survival and to avoid staying out of prison on multiple counts of corruption.

For the record, this is my initial analysis of the Netanyahu–Trump plan after it was made public. How I ask in it, did Bibi get his cabinet to come on board for this accord? As mentioned in that piece, the all-star best explanation I have read comes to us from John Whitbeck, the international attorney, now resident in Paris, with long experience on the Palestine question.

“Presumably,” he wrote his privately distributed blog just after the plan was announced,

“Netanyahu has, while still hoping that Hamas will reject this ultimatum, managed to convince these ministers of the sincerity of his insincerity in this instance.”

In this connection, Max Blumenthal pointed out not long before the plan was made public that Netanyahu was parading around Israel (and I think elsewhere, even in the U.S. if I am not mistaken) boasting openly that he has Trump completely under his control. There must be a reason for this, and I wonder now what it might be. In my view it is plausible to interpret these public displays as intended further to convince his cabinet of goons that he remained a reliable liar as Sept. 29 drew near, as if to say, I will go along with this but do not worry.

Caitlin Johnstone, allowing for the slim possibility that the Gaza Peace Plan will actually hold, posted a thought-provoking insight on “X” this morning:

[“If a permanent ceasefire actually happens and actually holds without mass expulsions and further Palestinian subjugation, the only explanation I can think of is that the U.S. and Israel crunched the numbers and determined that the PR crisis from the genocide makes it unsustainable.”

Johnstone prompts me to consider developments over the past day or so against the background of events elsewhere. The Spanish Parliament just voted a complete arms embargo against the Zionist state. The other day Gustavo Petro, Colombia’s honorable president, announced that Bogotá is expelling the Israeli diplomatic legation and severing all relations with Israel. New polls in the United States indicate that two-thirds of American Jews now condemn Israel for war crimes; a lesser but still considerable percentage think “the Jewish state” is guilty of genocide. Greta Thunberg and the aid flotillas have captured the imaginations of millions.

And then the demonstrations all over the Western world, mostly but not only in Europe. A quarter of a million in this that, and the other city among those listed above: The videos are very stirring. I have argued for some time — and I am not alone in this — that only force will stop the Zionists’ campaign of terror. It is all that is left. And as of this morning I count these immense displays of support for the Palestinian cause and condemnation of Israel a variety of force.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/10/p ... ne-corked/

******

Living in the remains of Gaza City
Huda Skaik

10 Oct 2025 , 11:22 am .

Image
Al-Rimal neighborhood in Gaza City, October 4, 2025 (Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi)

"While the world's eyes turn to Trump's proposal, here we are witnessing what appears to be the disappearance of Gaza."

GAZA CITY—Gaza City is a ghost town. Darkness, smoke, and shadows loom over it, illuminated only by the red glow of explosions. The city resembles scenes from apocalyptic movies: stories about the end of the world, human catastrophes, and world wars. The houses are deserted, the streets empty, and death surrounds us everywhere.

Every morning, new leaflets fall from the sky like snow, ordering us to leave Gaza City and head south. Most residents ignore the leaflets. Some children collect them, not to read them, but to burn them as cooking fuel, to boil whatever little rice or lentils they have. The irony is unbearable: the same papers that demand our departure now keep our small fires alive.

Every day, survival becomes more difficult, more burdensome. Basic tasks become insurmountable struggles. Prices continue to rise, and there is barely anything to buy. The waves of displaced people that once filled the roads have slowed to a trickle.

To fetch water, people must walk long distances carrying heavy jerry cans, risking tank fire and quadcopter bullets along the way. Cooking firewood is unaffordable, with 1 kg (approximately 2.2 pounds) costing around $2, which is only enough to heat a kettle.

It's very difficult to find quality food, and it's extremely scarce because border crossings are closed and merchants can no longer bring in produce from the south, as the main coastal highway is closed.

The few vendors gather in areas like the Al-Saraya crossing in the Al-Rimal neighborhood, west of Gaza City. The few products available at the market stalls are unaffordable and unhealthy, mostly sugary foods like Nutella, cookies, cheese, chips, and noodles, which don't provide enough protein.

Canned goods are even scarcer and more expensive. Just 250 grams of coffee now costs $38 in the north, while the same amount costs $16 in the south. Foods that strengthen our bodies, such as vegetables, fruits, eggs, chicken, and meat, have long been unavailable.

Cleaning supplies are extremely scarce, especially tissues and sanitary napkins. It is almost impossible to obtain medicines, leaving the sick and elderly destitute. Most health workers have left Gaza City with their families, and medical treatment is difficult to obtain. Al-Shifa Hospital is barely functioning.

Image
Al-Saraya intersection in the Al-Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City. October 4, 2025 (Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi)

There are few journalists left. Coverage from Gaza City has been curtailed because many reporters have fled, and those who remain operate with a kind of rationed courage: moving only when necessary and taking calculated risks based on increasingly scarce resources.

Since last month, the Israeli occupation has intensified its nightly attacks to terrorize the population and clear the way for its troops. They bomb us to protect their soldiers and commit massacres. Every night there are relentless bombings and attacks, including drones, fighter jets, airstrikes, artillery fire, helicopters, and explosions from remote-controlled robots laden with explosives, with the Israeli army blowing up entire neighborhoods in their wake. The robots level entire city blocks, a tactic used for the first time during this ground operation in Gaza City. They are not far away. Survival has become a daily gamble. We expect that death could come at any moment and that any minute could be the last.

The attacks intensify every day. I hear artillery shells hitting the western and eastern districts, drones buzzing overhead, intensive bombing and airstrikes, bullets from Apache helicopters and quadcopters, and tanks lumbering forward. And I hear the explosions from drones. The occupation continues to issue evacuation notices to residential buildings, which it then attacks, sowing panic and leaving people homeless.

At night, the city is plunged into a deep darkness, an empty, spectral landscape lit only by gigantic flames. All is silent except for the sounds of genocide as they work to erase our existence and our city. In these hours, it is impossible to rest or sleep. Every explosion brings with it another question: Will our building be next? Will tanks surround our neighborhood? Will the next shell demolish our home? Will we wake up trapped? Will we be forced to move, leaving everything behind?

Every night, I sit awake on my mattress at my small table, trying to study for my final exams and hand in my assignments. But I can only count the seconds between the roar of explosions and the rattle of tank fire. The ground shakes as Israeli forces advance toward my neighborhood of Al-Rimal, and I wonder if this will be the night they reach us. The worry is constant; it weighs on my chest like a weight I can't lift. Each night seems longer and darker than the last. For those who still remain in Gaza City, that's what the nights are like: endless and filled with fear.

Al-Rashid Street, the main coastal road connecting northern and southern Gaza, was closed on Wednesday. The Israeli army prohibited any movement from south to north. Movement from north to south (for displacement) remains permitted, although without security guarantees.

Image
Al-Rashid Street on October 4, 2025 (Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi)

On Friday, October 3, Israeli tanks and troops advanced toward the Tel al-Hawa neighborhood, west of Gaza City. That night, the attacks were relentless and violent. There were countless heavy airstrikes on different areas of Gaza City. We thought they would invade in the morning.

After US President Donald Trump presented a 20-point plan for a ceasefire in Gaza , he set Sunday as the deadline for Hamas to respond. On Friday morning, we woke up to the news that Hamas had signaled it would conditionally accept some parts of the plan, while insisting on guarantees and continued negotiations on key points.

In response, Trump publicly urged Israel to "immediately stop bombing Gaza" to make the hostages' release safer, marking a rare moment of direct US pressure on Israel's military operations. The Israeli military also announced it would begin "preparations for the first phase" of Trump's plan.

While the world's eyes are focused on Trump's proposal, here we are experiencing what appears to be the disappearance of Gaza. What is happening on the ground is entirely different. The tanks are still in the city and have never withdrawn. The quadcopter drone was flying over the Kanz area, in the Al-Rimal neighborhood, in central Gaza City, and also in the western areas of the city. On Saturday, there was also intense artillery bombardment around the university area in western Gaza City, and the bombardment continues as I write these lines.

The Israeli army claims its forces have transitioned to defensive operations. But on Saturday, it committed a brutal massacre against the Abdel Aal family, killing at least 18 people, most of them children, in an airstrike on their family home in the Al-Tuffah neighborhood in eastern Gaza City. More than 30 people were injured, also mostly children. More than 20 people remain under the rubble. A horrific massacre, with little capacity for medical care and civil defense teams having no rescue capabilities in the area.

Despite increasing talk of a ceasefire abroad, here in Gaza City, we live in a strange limbo, suspended between hope and annihilation. If Trump's plan becomes a tool to force a real, verifiable, and immediate end to Israeli attacks, free captives on both sides, and gain humanitarian access, then there will be a slim chance of beginning the near-impossible task of reconstruction. If the plan fails, Gaza will be completely destroyed and the population massacred.

Palestinians in Gaza are cautiously optimistic about the proposed ceasefire, but a deep sense of concern remains. The population in the north has some hope that they will no longer be displaced south. Lives will be saved. Those displaced south dream of returning to their homes in Gaza City and other northern towns. They hope for a repeat of the scenes of joy, relief, and takbirs witnessed in January, when hundreds of thousands of people returned north.

The prospect of a ceasefire is not a political issue, but a matter of survival. It's a question of whether families will live to see another day. The only question everyone here is asking is whether this ongoing genocide will finally end this time, or whether the bombing will resume soon after it ceases. Because if this opportunity is missed, Gaza may not survive.

https://misionverdad.com/traducciones/v ... ad-de-gaza

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply