Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Dec 02, 2023 1:09 pm

Who teaches who?
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/02/2023

Image

Without any subtlety in his demands, the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces recently published a list of those elements he needs to safely continue the war. Valery Zaluznhy mentioned, for example, the need for Western aviation and missiles to balance air potential, electronic warfare material to blind Russian drones, demining equipment to overcome Russian minefields or intelligence. The Ukrainian general also added the creation of a strategic reserve, that is, a broad and continuous training program for Ukrainian soldiers to be able to replenish the ranks of the army as the front takes casualties. According to the only data currently available - and whose origin is an anonymous leak from the United States, so it can be assumed that the figure is an estimate favorable to Ukraine - Kiev would have lost 120,000 wounded soldiers and 70,000 dead in the war, figures that are possibly even higher and will continue to increase as the war lengthens.

The casualties, the flight from the country of men of military age and the reality of having a population much smaller than the Russian one makes the lack of personnel to handle the weapons that Zaluzhny requires an added danger for Ukraine. Kiev has managed to avoid part of the problem of training the mobilized population with the help of its partners, many of whom have organized training programs that were supposed to help the Ukrainian Armed Forces to, among other things, abandon Soviet tactics and mentality. to adapt to NATO's ways of waging war. These training programs were to help the war effort also in the form of security guarantees. Throughout last summer, much has been said about the low life expectancy of the troops who were sent to certain areas of the front. However, the possibility of training abroad, out of the reach of Russian troops, means avoiding the danger of training camps being reached even before recruits are sent to Avdeevka, Kremennaya, Rabotino or Kherson.

Training abroad was also supposed to improve efficiency and specifically prepare soldiers for the offensive they were going to carry out. However, throughout the summer months, especially at times when it was clearer that events were not going according to plan, poor training was one of the complaints raised by soldiers who had participated in the training program. training in countries like the United Kingdom. As could be read then in the Ukrainian media, the soldiers mentioned, for example, the lack of work in learning demining, one of the aspects that had proven to be key.

An article published by Politico after a guided tour of one of the training sites for Ukrainian soldiers in France wants to respond to the complaints and shortcomings that the Ukrainian authorities have denounced in the past. Without giving details about the location of the training camp and pointing to the mutual benefit for Ukraine and France, the media describes the changes that have occurred in the soldiers' routine. To begin with, the program prevents the exchange of phone numbers. The objective is none other than to lose contact once the program ends. “It's time to cut ties,” says one of the captains participating in the training in reference to the end of the program, since “otherwise, when we find out that someone has died, we would wonder what we did wrong.”

Politico affirms that France has taken into account previous complaints to incorporate aspects into the training that are closer to the real conditions of war. “According to French officials, Ukraine asked France to prepare future soldiers to endure harsh battlefield conditions and operate in cold, noisy, sleep-deprived environments. Remains of dead animals have been scattered in the trenches to accustom Ukrainians to the smell of death. "French troops launch surprise attacks at night," explains the media, which also adds that the use of drones has also been incorporated. Of course, the description of the instruction to defend against the use of drones by the opponent reveals the defensive, not offensive, aspect of what Ukraine hopes to be an instruction for large-scale offensive operations.

Perhaps the most interesting part of the article, which does not reveal too many details of an apparently unsophisticated training, is the use of it by the training armies. “Teaching Ukrainian soldiers costs France around 300 million euros according to a Parliament report. But the French army is also benefiting,” explains Politico , adding that the basis of action of armed forces like the French one has been, in recent decades, counterinsurgency, a method adapted to the wars and military interventions in which they have participated. . “The war in Ukraine has changed that,” he says, without explaining the difference between the counterinsurgency that France has carried out in Mali or the United States in Afghanistan with the land war between two large armies that is currently being fought. “The life-or-death struggle in Ukraine gives students advice for their instructors,” says Politico , describing the situation as “win-win” but giving the impression that it is Western countries that are taking advantage of the situation to recover for themselves. their armies knowledge of trench warfare, “something they can use to prepare France for high-intensity warfare.”

The article states, citing a lieutenant colonel identified only as Erwan, that “everyone is returning to the trenches” and explains that France “has returned to the doctrines of the two world wars and the trenches built for the Ukrainian exercises.” "They will be reused by French troops." It is curious that the article mentions the two world wars, possibly the last occasion in which Western armies that must instruct the much more seasoned - specifically by eight years of mud and cold in Donbass - have stepped into a trench. “The Ukrainians claimed that the French training trenches were too wide, that gardening boots were more appropriate than military footwear, and have given advice on how to optimize the use of grenades.” Who is in a position to learn from whom?

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/02/quien-ensena-a-quien/

.Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 1
December 1, 2023
Rybar

Image

The loudest event of the day was the large number of publications about the capture of Marinka in the Donetsk direction . In fact, the Russian Armed Forces occupied several streets in the southwestern part of the city and planted a flag on one of the outermost houses. It is still premature to talk about the complete capture of the settlement, although the situation is developing more and more in this direction - the Ukrainian Armed Forces still hold positions in the northwestern part of the city.

In the Avdeevsky sector, units of the Russian Armed Forces on the northern flank advanced into the forest belt south of Novokalinovo . West of Avdeevka, the Russian Army significantly improved its tactical position, occupying important positions on the heights east and west of Severny, bypassing the settlement from the side. In addition, after capturing the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strongholds in this area, the enemy also left some positions in Pervomaisky .

In the Kherson direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces conducted another landing in Krynki . At the moment, in the destroyed village there are several hundred Ukrainian soldiers who crossed from the right bank. Nevertheless, the enemy is suffering significant losses while trying to gain a foothold and has not yet taken active action.

In the Kupyansky sector , the Russian Armed Forces are expanding the zone of control around Timkovka , occupying tactically important heights. In the Bakhmut area there are battles on the approaches to Bogdanovka to the south of the city and near Kleshcheevka on the northern flank: without significant changes.

We also clarified the information on irretrievable losses in the ranks of the Armed Forces of foreign mercenaries for the entire period of the Northern Military District: they amounted to more than 536 thousand people, of which almost 215 thousand were killed, and over 800 thousand were temporarily displaced.

Lancet strike on Ukrainian Su-25 at Dolgintsevo airfield

Image
Yesterday, footage of an attack on an Air Force Su-25 at a military airfield in Krivoy Rog was published . Almost immediately, controversy broke out online regarding the fact that it was a mock-up. For our part, we note a few points about this:

The “shabby” marks on the hull are more reminiscent of the characteristic “pixel” camouflage that the Ukrainian Air Force first began painting the sides of back in 2012. And the lantern could be covered with an improvised cover. The target has no visible disproportions, and also has drop tanks, wingtips and brake flaps, which is relatively high detail for what appears to be a mockup . There is also nothing fundamentally strange in the lack of activity around the planes at the time of arrival and fires after. During previous attacks on Dolgintsevo, the sides also stood in splendid isolation and did not always light up when hit.

A really controversial point is the strange connection between the wing and the engines. However, this can also be explained by errors in visual perception due to insufficient camera resolution. By the way, yesterday morning residents of Krivoy Rog observed seven Ukrainian planes passing along the same route. The event is clearly connected with the arrival of the Lancet in Dolgintsevo at the same hours. And once again we note the ability of the Russian Armed Forces to hit targets 70 km from the front line with loitering ammunition and exercise objective control, which indicates the increased combat capabilities of the Russian troops in at least several areas.

Losses of the Ukrainian side as a result of a special military operation of the Russian Armed Forces as of December 1, 2023

Over the entire period of the Northern Military District, irretrievable losses of the armed forces of Ukraine amounted to 536,854 people. Of these, 214,883 people were killed. The irretrievable category also includes 62 thousand missing people, prisoners and disabled people. 864,374 people fell into the temporarily out of action category . Thus, the total losses of Ukrainian forces exceed 1.4 million people.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

In the Starobelsky direction, fierce fighting continues in the Kupyansky sector : Russian military personnel are fighting in the eastern part of Sinkovka . To the east, the fighters, supported by armored vehicles, are advancing south from Olshan . In addition, the Russian Armed Forces are building on their success near Timkovka , expanding the zone of control around previously occupied tactical heights


In the Soledar direction, fighting continues on the approaches to Bogdanovka in the south, there are no changes. On the southern flank in the Kleshcheevka area , unmanned aircraft and artillery prevent the enemy from rotating during the day, hitting places where manpower is concentrated.

Image
In the Donetsk direction , the front began to move: this morning there were reports of a complete clearing of Marinka : the reason was a video with a Russian flag hoisted over a house on Komsomolskaya Street on the westernmost outskirts of the city. However, it is too early to talk about the capture of Marinka - the enemy still holds positions in the northwestern part. And to completely destroy Ukrainian forces in this area, a lot more work needs to be done .


The difficulties for carrying out assault operations are still the same: the city is now complete ruins, which are perfectly visible from the air from all sides. The fighting actually goes from basement to basement - there are simply no other shelters in this area. This creates difficulties for consolidation at the taken boundaries. The Armed Forces of Ukraine, however, have similar problems with the addition that as the Russian Armed Forces slowly advance, it will become increasingly difficult for them to supply their centers of defense in the ruins of Marinka .

In the evening, a video appeared with soldiers of the 103rd Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 150th Motorized Rifle Division reporting complete control over Marinka near Donetsk . According to some reports, within a day, Russian troops actually managed to crush the defenses of Ukrainian formations in the southwestern part of the city: it was there that the Russian flag was raised over one of the houses. According to other sources, the Ukrainian Armed Forces still hold positions in the northwestern part of the ruins of the long-suffering settlement. However, if the information about the advance of the Russian Armed Forces to the south is correct, then the enemy’s retreat is a matter of the near future. In any case, it will be possible to speak with confidence about the complete transition of Marinka to Russian control after the appearance of appropriate personnel for objective control .

Image
In the Avdeevsky sector, units of the Russian Armed Forces on the northern flank are fighting for forest belts in the direction south of Novokalinovo . Russian units managed to occupy part of the forest belt and expand the zone of control. On the outskirts of the Avdeevsky coking plant, local clashes continue: the main efforts of the Russian Armed Forces are focused on hitting a powerful stronghold with fire in order to avoid casualties among personnel.

To the west of Avdeevka, the assault detachments of the Russian Armed Forces, with the support of artillery and aviation, were able to make significant progress, occupying important positions on tactical heights east and west of Severny , bypassing the settlement from the side. In addition, the zone of control to the west of this area has been expanded: after the capture of Ukrainian Armed Forces strongholds in this direction, the tactical position of the Ukrainian formations worsened further to the south - in the village of Pervomaiskoe. Here, soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces advanced along the reservoir. The Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Severnoye - Pervomaiskoye section are offering less resistance than before. Losses in manpower and successes of the RF Armed Forces affect the moral and psychological state of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which simplifies the conduct of assault operations. The main problem for the Russian Armed Forces continues to be the mines that litter the fields around populated areas.

Image
In the Ugledarsky sector, there have been no significant changes since our last report on the situation in mid-September: there is a positional war in the sector with FPV drone raids, sporadic attacks by small groups and battles for forest plantations. One of these clashes occurred in the morning, when a unit of the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried to dislodge fighters of the 39th motorized rifle brigade of the Russian Armed Forces from their positions. The assault ended in vain for the enemy: having lost one armored car, he retreated to his original lines.

Along the line of combat contact there is a routine exchange of artillery strikes. If they have the necessary means, Russian troops are conducting a counter-battery fight: according to generalized data from the Creamy Caprice channel , in November five enemy howitzers and MLRS were reliably hit in the sector. In general, Ugledar and its surroundings have long been a secondary destination for both the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the RF Armed Forces. Neither side is taking active offensive actions with large forces.


In the Orekhovsky sector , which has recently become a secondary direction, the routine continues: the Russian Armed Forces are conducting a positional offensive from Verbovoy . The enemy, in turn, periodically attacks in small groups with the support of equipment at Rabotino .


In the Kherson direction in Krynki, fierce fighting continues in the center of the village and in the adjacent forest belt, where the enemy is trying to gain a foothold. There is active counter-battery warfare in the area using drones and artillery, thereby reducing the fire impact on Russian troops. At the moment, the Ukrainian Armed Forces control about half of the village, in which there are about a battalion of enemy soldiers. The enemy is bringing in new reinforcements and taking away the wounded with the help of boats, which, unfortunately, not all of them can be sunk. At the same time, in the village itself, Ukrainian formations do not resort to active clashes, mostly hiding in houses and basements.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
By the evening, Ukrainian formations shelled the village of Kurkovichi in the Starodubsky district of the Bryansk region . Details of the incident are unknown.


During the day, Ukrainian troops attacked the Kuibyshevsky district of Donetsk , there was damage to residential buildings, but no casualties were reported. However, a woman wounded yesterday as a result of shelling died today from multiple wounds. In the evening, the enemy struck Makeevka and Yasinovataya , there is no information about damage.

Image
The Ukrainian Armed Forces continue artillery terror on the left bank of the Kherson region . The civilian infrastructure of Nova Kakhovka , Podstepnoye , Korsunka , Aleshek , Kakhovka , Gola Pristan , Krynok and Dnepryan was under attack . In the latter, several residential buildings and power lines were damaged as a result of shelling, but no one was injured.

Political events
Problems on the Ukrainian-Polish border Polish carriers at the Krakovets - Karchova
checkpoint did not allow a single vehicle from the Ukrainian side to pass overnight. The Ukrainians, in turn, went on a hunger strike and demanded the passage of at least 14 trucks per hour. At the moment they are waiting for a meeting with the Lublin consul , expecting the situation to improve. Trucks with fuel and other dangerous and perishable cargo have lined up in more than a thousand vehicles and are not allowed through. In addition, Polish police are preventing Ukrainian drivers from entering nearby stores to buy food and water, and weather conditions are worsening.

Zelensky about unfulfilled victories at the front
Today, the President of Ukraine gave a long interview to the Associated Press . One of the most interesting statements is that the Ukrainian formations were unable to achieve the desired results as a result of the so-called counter-offensive. “We wanted faster results. From this point of view, unfortunately, we have not achieved the desired results. And that's a fact." He added: “Look, we are not backing down, I am pleased. We are fighting with the second (best) army in the world, I am satisfied. We are losing people, I am not satisfied. We didn't get all the weapons we wanted, I can't be satisfied, but I can't complain too much . " It can be stated that the president is already satisfied with at least the fact that the Ukrainian army is still trying to hold lines at the front, despite the heavy losses suffered in the summer.

Vladimir Zelensky added that one of the reasons for the failure was the shortage of personnel. However, this does not mean that Ukraine should give up; in his words, it is necessary to continue the “struggle” . The President complains that due to the shift of global attention from Western allies to the Middle East conflict in Israel, it has led to a reduction in supplies for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which forces them to open their own production facilities, but, funny enough, with the money of Western partners.

He said that “nothing scares Russia more than a militarily self-sufficient Ukraine.” In addition, he commented on recent rumors that Western countries such as Germany and the United States are trying to bring Ukraine and Russia to the negotiating table and stop the fighting, saying that "some voices are always heard", without making it clear from whom .

On Viktor Orban’s refusal to accept Ukraine into the EU

The Prime Minister of Hungary said on local radio today that he suggested that the European Union should not rush into making a decision on Ukraine’s accession to the EU. “If we do not know what the consequences will be after Ukraine’s possible accession to the EU, then we should not enter into negotiations... Therefore, I will present the point of view according to which the EU should first sign a strategic partnership agreement with Ukraine.”

The Hungarian Prime Minister also proposed not to put the issue of Ukraine’s accession to the EU on the agenda of the summit in December, but to postpone it for 5-10 years. “It is clear in advance that there will be no agreement among countries , ” Orban said . In addition, he added that Ukraine’s membership in the EU “today does not coincide with the national interests of Hungary."

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

Rising Tensions Between Political and Military Leaders in Ukraine as Military Campaign Fails
NOVEMBER 29, 2023

Image
A Ukrainian soldier in the battlefield. Illustration: Zeinab El-Hajj/Al Mayadeen English.

By Dmitri Kovalevich – Nov 27, 2023

In November, the Ukrainian authorities once again extended martial law for three months. This means that the presidential election scheduled for March 31, 2024, will not happen because the election law requires 100 days for campaigning. Martial law restrictions and a “democratic election” are not mixing well in militarized Ukraine.

Volodymyr Zelensky himself affirmed on November 6 that “now is not the right time” to hold an election. The secretary of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) of Ukraine, Oleksiy Danilov, predicts “great misfortune” for Ukraine if an election were held because of the widespread political discussion it would provoke. But there is a rub: President Zelenskyy’s term, according to the Constitution, ends on March 31, 2024. After that, he loses constitutional legitimacy and becomes a usurper of power.

Additionally, legislative elections in Ukraine should have been held in October 2023, meaning the legislature has actually lost its constitutional legitimacy, even if it continues to pass laws. These legal nuances do not receive any attention from the Western sponsors of the Kyiv regime or the regime itself. That is because, in their opinion, the abolition of democracy in Ukraine has taken place in the name of “democracy” and the fight against the “authoritarian regime” of the Russian Federation. In Russia, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year.

Meanwhile, The Economist magazine recently cited Western officials saying that the conflict in Ukraine may well last another five years. The Western military-industrial complexes like the sound of such a scenario predicting a drawn-out battle because a long war would be profitable for them. What’s more, in order to motivate Western governments to make room in their budgets to expand the military-industrial complex, the demand for more and more armaments must be good for years, if not permanently.

Ukraine cannot sustain its war machine
But here is the problem that concerns Ukraine: the country will soon exhaust its human resources, regardless of how many armaments are sent its way by the NATO countries.

The American satirical publication The Babylon Bee draws attention to this contradiction when it writes, jokingly, “Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is calling for the immediate suspension of presidential elections in his country, so that he may focus all his efforts on fighting to protect democracy in Ukraine. ‘We must suspend democracy to save democracy,’ said Zelensky during his weekly ‘telemarathon’ [situation report]. ‘If we allow democracy to get in the way of fighting for democracy, we might lose our democracy. And also lose our billions of sweet, sweet American dollars. What will happen to my superyacht in Dubai… Oh, sorry, what was I talking about? Oh yeah, it’s time to cancel elections so I may remain president indefinitely.’”

The Bee’s humor is not so humorous for the Ukrainian people because in order to maintain power, Zelensky could theoretically extend martial law endlessly, thereby forcing thousands and thousands more conscripted citizens into the slaughter along the front lines.

An MP from Zelensky’s party and his closest adviser, Mykola Tishchenko, recently responded rather frankly to a colleague, MP Heorhiy Mazurashu, about the state of democracy in Ukraine. “Democracy does not exist anywhere in the world,” he said. “It is a myth.”

Concern about 2024 US election
Nevertheless, Zelensky rather suspects the likelihood of a change of administration in the United States next year. In anticipation, his office has begun to examine the exact stances of the Republican Party, as it similarly studied four years ago where the Democratic Party stood on Kyiv’s conflict with Russia. In November, Zelensky invited Donald Trump to Ukraine, presumably expecting to hear from Trump there would be no overtures with Russia for a negotiated end to the war should Trump be elected. Wartime rule is all that Zelensky and his advisers and sycophants have left. Trump declined the invitation to visit.

Ukrainian authorities then came up with the idea of inviting former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to join the board of directors of Ukrainian operator Kyivstar, Ukraine’s largest mobile operator. Pompeo is reported to have accepted.

Under a similar scheme, Joe Biden’s son was earlier invited and accepted to work at the Ukrainian gas production company Burisma. This kind of work pays stratospheric salaries to selected board members who may not even show up to attend meetings or who merely stage rote appearances. It is called “sinecure” in English, defined as a position requiring little or no work but giving the holder status or financial benefit. It is a common form of bribery and corruption of high-ranking officials in capitalist countries, including in subordinate countries such as Ukraine. “This is how bribes are paid in the ‘enlightened’ West,” writes the Telegram channel Open Ukraine, commenting on Mike Pompeo’s new job. “Gone are the days of paying bribes with suitcases stuffed with cash.”

Rifts exposed between Ukraine’s political and military leaders
However, after the failed “counteroffensive” of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), launched in June of this year to much fanfare but with little achieved many months later, and after recent delays in promised deliveries of more US military supplies to Ukraine (perhaps portending outright cuts to supplies by the US government), a rift has emerged within the Ukrainian power system. Since his election in 2019, Zelensky has already purged the near entirety of the political opposition in the country, accusing many of them of “working for the Kremlin.” So the only political conflicts that can now erupt are internal, pitting the governing regime against this or that clan of former associates. Odessa-based anarchist Vyacheslav Azarov writes that all of opposition politics in Ukraine is now reduced to “squabbles of factions within the ruling party.”

The main rift today is between the country’s political and military leadership. The real power in Ukraine sits with those who control the military, including its far-right paramilitary formations now fully integrated into the regular armed forces. Failures in the counteroffensive have deepened existing frictions and political divisions.

The Ukrainian military is now blaming the political leadership for throwing it to the slaughter for the purpose of providing Western benefactors with images and reports of military “successes,” which, in turn, act to sustain the flow of money and arms to Kyiv. Ukrainian soldiers are routinely labeling their commanders as “butchers” for sending them for the umpteenth time to storm Russian defense lines head-on, in many cases stepping over the bodies of their comrades who fell during previous assaults since June. For his part, Zelensky blames the generals for the failure of the counteroffensive.

According to Zelensky’s former adviser Oleksiy Arestovich (who has fled to the US), the president is in a “serious conflict” with high-ranking Ukrainian military officers over the failure of the AFU counteroffensive. As it turns out, Ukrainian military leaders are not satisfied with the misuse of Western military aid and the low level of competence of the government, as they see it. Zelensky’s policy is simply becoming ineffective, says Arestovich. He explained in a recent interview with Spain’s El Mundo that the position of AFU commander-in-chief Valeriy Zaluzhnyi “often radically diverges” from Zelensky’s position.

Valeriy Zaluzhnyi leads a group of disgruntled military men and is in a position to challenge Zelensky. All other rivals from the 2019 election find themselves either in jail or in exile. Some analysts believe that Zaluzhnyi may be chosen to replace Zelensky for the purpose of leading when the negotiations inevitably take place with Russia. One year ago, Zelensky banned all negotiations with the Russian president. It would be a very difficult sell for him to now turn around and conduct talks.

Zaluzhnyi told The Economist on November 1 that the conflict with Russia had entered a “stalemate.” Zelensky has responded with harsh words for his top general, telling him to “stay out of politics” (as though Zaluzhnyi’s claim of “stalemate” has nothing to do with military realities).

Sergei Markov, director of the Russian Institute for Political Studies, believes that the head of Zelensky’s Office, Andrei Yermak, flew to the United States in mid-November to meet with current Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and coordinate the dismissal of General Zaluzhnyi. “But not simply fire him. If Zelensky fires Zaluzhnyi… he will become a free man who will be able to run for president and win the election [in 2024] against Zelensky. The president suspects that the Americans want to replace him with Zaluzhnyi. Therefore, Zelensky must not just fire Zaluzhnyi, but repress him, accusing him of corruption or high treason. Zelensky can also appoint Zaluzhnyi to a position that prohibits him from participating in elections. This is the main problem that Zelensky is tackling.”

According to Markov, there is a popular belief in United States governing circles that leaders in countries subordinate to the West should be periodically changed so that they do not become too independent. That said, Markov believes that a change of leaders in Ukraine at this stage cannot affect the outcome of Russian military operations for the simple reason that one or the other leader is not the one directing the course of the country. That is being decided and directed in Washington.

An MP from Zelensky’s party, Yevhen Shevchenko, says that General Zaluzhnyi has very flawed perceptions of reality. He dreams and writes about robots replacing humans in combat. If you read his narrative in The Economist on November 1 [text here], his ideas for “winning” the war include acquiring “military-technological innovation,” going so far as to compare today’s situation to that of hundreds of years ago when China first invented and used gunpowder.

“He is referring to robot soldiers,” Shevchenko said. “He saw these robots somewhere at a military exhibition in New York, then came to Zelensky and said, ‘We need those.'”

Shevchenko writes that sooner or later, Ukraine’s supply of soldiers will run out. “Can you imagine the look on Zelensky’s face when he heard about ‘robot soldiers’ from Zaluzhnyi? Now do you understand the nature of their conflict?”

In an interview with Ukrainian political analyst Vadim Karasev, AFU Major General Dmytro Marchenko blames Zaluzhnyi for the failure of the counter-offensive. “Who forced us to attack right at the center of the enemy’s reinforced defenses instead of along the flanks? Who was deciding this? Where are the diversionary and deceptive maneuvers that are needed? Where are they? And we thought he was a brilliant commander,” Marchenko said.

As a Ukrainian saying goes, a victory always has many fathers while a failure or defeat is always an orphan.

There are further rifts within the Ukrainian military. In an interview with Ukraine’s Radio NV, Roman Kostenko, secretary of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security, Defense, and Intelligence, said that Ukrainian military men in the trenches joke that there are two Ukrainian armies: the AFU led by Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, and the one led by Olexandr Syrsky (commander of Ukraine’s ground forces). Each military grouping has its own political ambitions and appetite for funds from the Western sponsors of the war. And the more that funding from the United States decreases, the more the internal strife and competition among American vassals in Ukraine will grow.

Zelensky regime reaching out to Trump and the Republicans for support
In addition to meeting with the Biden administration, Zelensky’s people in the United States are trying to establish contacts with Trump’s entourage, according to Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Dubinsky. Commenting on the recent visit of the head of the Office of President Andriy Yermak to Washington, he writes, “Now the real president of Ukraine, named Yermak, is in the United States trying to convince the American government that there is no corruption in Ukraine and to blame the theft committed by him and those from his circle on the scheming of “Kremlin agents.” He is also trying to arrange a telephone conversation between Zelensky and Trump in order to gain support in Congress for aid to Ukraine, which he and Zelensky are plundering.”

Dubinsky’s comment is written to right-wing US journalist Tucker Carlson in the form of an appeal to join forces in “exposing” the corrupt regime in Kyiv. “By joining our forces, we will be able to reveal to the world the truth about the gang of swindlers who captured Ukraine. Reveal the Ugly Truth that Yermak and Zelensky and their associates are trying to hide.”

Even Zelensky’s advisers are admitting to Western media that corruption is rampant. “People are stealing like there’s no tomorrow,” an unnamed advisor to Zelensky is quoted in TIME magazine on November 1.

Dubinsky was once elected on the ticket of Zelensky’s Servant of the People party, but then the paths of the two diverged as Dubinsky began to criticize the president. Recently, this former associate of Zelensky has been charged with high treason and has been sent to a pre-trial detention center for two months.

Similar procedures have been used in the past in Ukraine to purge any opposition, all in the name of “fighting for democracy.” Typically in Ukraine, the criminally accused do not receive a verdict in court. Instead, they can wallow in jail for years while awaiting a court’s verdict.

Pervasive corruption and the decisive role by Washington
The continuation by Kyiv of the war against Russia and refusal to negotiate to perpetuate not only a dictatorship in Ukraine but also the pervasive corruption in the country, making it a central part of the lives of all of the country’s citizens. Today, the opportunity to flee abroad (and thereby avoid military conscription) costs between US$7,000 and US$10,000 in bribes. Temporary deferment from conscription for six months costs from US$2,000 to US$5,000. For military service outside the combat zone: US$1,000 to US$2,000 for six months. It goes without saying that those employed in military administrations have formed into a parasitic caste with strong material interests in having the war last forever.

However, the duration of the war depends not only on the actions of Ukraine’s authorities. The decisive role is being played by the US government. Even Ukrainian military leaders and ultranationalists recognize Kiev’s complete dependence on the US Ruslan Onishchenko, ex-commander of the Tornado, ultranationalist (far right) battalion of the AFU, told journalist Volodymyr Panchakin in an interview that he believes Ukraine will be forced into negotiations when and only when it suits US interests. “I am leaning towards the fact that we will be dragged to the negotiating table by the scruff of the neck. By whom? By our allies, let’s call them so. I would not like to call them masters, although we are vassals and slaves” he says, acknowledging that the regime in Kyiv is merely a tool or a vassal of the United States.

We should recall who these self-declared US vassals are. In 2015, Ruslan Onischenko and many other members of the Tornado battalion were accused of torture, atrocities, rapes, and sadism which they practiced not only against Donbass residents but sometimes also against their own soldiers. They were sentenced to long prison terms but released in 2022 into the Ukrainian army, to be unleashed against Russian soldiers.

Some Russian political analysts are convinced that the West is merely seeking a temporary respite in the war, enough time to produce more shells and military equipment. Deindustrialization in the West has produced a shortfall in production capacity, unlike in Russia. Once the Western military-industrial complex succeeds in renewing and expanding its production capacity, a new Kyiv regime will once again be pushed into attempts at suicidal revenge against Russia.

Ukrainian voices opposing such a course will continue to be silenced and suppressed. But it is highly unlikely that after all the people of Donbass, Crimea, and the Russian Federation as a whole have been through since 2014, nothing less than Russia’s original goals will be on a negotiation table. The principal Russian conditions for peace remain as before: no NATO membership for Ukraine, and the demilitarization and denazification of the country.

https://orinocotribune.com/rising-tensi ... ign-fails/

*******

Has the Ukraine Conflict Entered its Endgame?
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on NOVEMBER 30, 2023
Vladislav Ugolny

Six months after the start of Ukraine’s counteroffensive near Artemovsk [which Kiev calls Bakhmut], the operation completely collapsed and Russian troops were able to seize the initiative. Launching a series of attacks, Moscow’s forces recovered some of the positions they had lost to the northwest of the city in the area of the Berkhovsky reservoir, and again took control over the line along the Artemovsk-Gorlovka railway on the southern flank.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian plan, which implied an offensive in at least three operational directions – towards Melitopol, Berdyansk and Artemovsk – failed. Instead of focusing on one task at a time, as Western experts had recommended, Kiev dispersed its forces and did not succeed in any of its goals. Now, the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) has been forced to switch from offensive to defensive tactics.

The background story

Ukraine’s initially ambitious plan to launch an offensive on Artemovsk implied taking action in at least four areas: from Chasov Yar towards Kleshcheyevka and further along the southern flank of Artemovsk; from Chasov Yar to the northern outskirts of Artemovsk, south of the Berkhovsky reservoir; from Slavyansk in the direction of Artemovsk and Soledar; and from Seversk towards Soledar.

However, this plan did not succeed because of the lack of numbers and the timely transfer of Russian units, which replaced PMC Wagner fighters involved in the final battles for Artemovsk. Attacks from the directions of Slavyansk and Seversk failed, while the assault on the city’s northern flank was only partially successful – the Ukrainian army advanced several kilometers and exhausted its offensive potential.

The AFU managed to actively gain ground only in the south, in the direction of Russia’s defenses, constructed along the Kleshcheyevka-Andreevka-Kurdyumovka line. The Ukrainians were able to take control over the first two villages only by mid-September, five months into their counteroffensive in this area. Kurdyumovka, however, is still controlled by the Russian army. In the following days, the AFU continued its eastward offensive, managing to advance past the rail line in some sections.

Apparently, the next goal of the Ukrainian army was to expand the staging area on the eastern bank of the Seversky Donets–Donbass canal in order to reach the southern outskirts of Artemovsk and the northern outskirts of Gorlovka. At just about that time, in October 2023, rumors about an impending assault on the latter began to circulate in the media.

Russians seize the initiative

In order to counteract this plan, the Russian army launched a series of counterattacks near the Berkhovsky reservoir. In their analysis of the summer campaign (dated September 25), Ukrainian military analysts from the military portal DeepState stated the following: “Things aren’t that good on the northern front, where there was initial success. But the strategic mistake of going to Berkhovka, exposed to enemy fire in the lowlands, cost us dearly. Now, the enemy has seized the initiative there.”

Based on information provided by its sources at the front, in October and November DeepState reported that the Ukrainian army had retreated from its positions. By November 24, the Russians had practically returned to their starting points, once again threatening to take control over the villages of Bogdanovka and Khromove.

Ukrainian forces in this area – primarily consisting of the Third and Fifth Assault Brigades (which largely exhausted their strength during the course of previous assaults), the 80th Airborne Assault Brigade, the Lyut Assault Brigade and their colleagues from the 22nd, 28th, 92nd and the barely-recovered 93rd Mechanized Brigades – were not able to hold back the Russian troops, especially after active battles around Avdeevka, which required the concentration of Ukrainian artillery in that area. As a result, Russian troops were able to reverse the situation in their favor, including in the area where the Ukrainians continued to slowly advance.

On October 30, Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian ground forces, Alexander Syrsky, reported that Russian forces were strengthening their presence in the Artemovsk area and transitioning from defensive to offensive tactics. On November 18, 19, and 24, the Ukrainians admitted that Russian troops had advanced near Kleshcheyevka, and on November 22, they reported that their enemies had moved closer to Andreevka, which was left in ruins during previous battles.

According to visual confirmation by open-source intelligence (OSINT) communities, Russian troops were able to almost completely restore their defensive line along the Artemovsk-Gorlovka railway and cross it in a number of places. The fiercest fighting is now taking place in the heights which dominate the area to the northwest of Kleshcheyevka. If they are forced to retreat, Kiev’s troops will have to withdraw to their original positions so as not to remain in the lowlands exposed to enemy fire – a problem similar to the one they faced on the northern flank.

The assault on Gorlovka – foolish tactics or a PsyOp?

Why did the Ukrainians decide to disperse their forces and advance in three operational directions during the summer campaign? Several Russian experts stated that Kiev’s strategy was to win the battle of reserves –and to this end, its army attempted to create several hotbeds of tension that were supposed to swallow up Russian manpower. In case of success, the AFU would have been able to overcome the deadlock of positional warfare and deliver a crushing blow in one of the directions.

In reality, however, the Ukrainians were not able to beat the Russian army, which was strong enough to carry out both a localized offensive on the border between the Lugansk People’s Republic and Kharkov region this summer, and the offensive on Avdeevka in October. On top of that, Russian troops continued to hold their defensive lines in Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, as well as near Artemovsk. So why did the Ukrainians refuse to concentrate their forces in one area, as Western experts advised them to do?

One possible explanation for this was the reputational and media significance of the “Bakhmut Fortress,” which the Ukrainian political and military leadership fell victim to. The ‘heroic’ defense of one position, which gradually lost its strategic and operational importance, endowed Artemovsk with ideological and reputational significance. In an attempt to recapture this city, Ukrainians pulled their reserves and most motivated units into battle.

Or perhaps, the situation was even worse. After the summer defeat, they needed to distract the public from negative news. The best way to do so would have been to break through the front line separating Ukraine and the Donbass republics which had existed from 2015 to February 24, 2022. In case of success, Zelensky would have had the chance to proclaim the return of “Ukrainian” land lost by his predecessors.

One of the areas where this plan was theoretically possible to carry out was Gorlovka – a large industrial city located south of Artemovsk, where about 300,000 people lived before the war. Gorlovka has been under the control of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) since the latter declared independence in 2014. Some of the fiercest battles in Donbass were fought there.

After Time magazine published an article about the conflict between Kiev’s political and military leadership around plans to storm the city (the military command refused the idea), Ukrainian expert Bogdan Miroshnikov commented on November 16: “In order to liberate it, it is necessary to conduct a strategic offensive operation and involve at least 150,000-200,000 troops along with thousands of units of equipment. Some may say that we are [positioned] near Gorlovka. Yes, we are. But that direction is surrounded by numerous spoil tips. This means a frontal assault is necessary. But no one would do that.”

However, on November 17, footage appeared of Ukrainian stormtroopers atop one of the spoil tips – which used to be in the gray zone, but formally under Russian control. After that, battles in this area intensified. The Ukrainian media, however, refused to comment, claiming that “the situation is being clarified.”

Considering the landscape with the spoil tips, a potential offensive on Gorlovka could not be carried out using several brigades. In order to start an offensive in this direction, the AFU would have needed to recover its positions to the north of the city, in the area of the southern flank of Artemovsk. Whether this was the plan of the Ukrainian leadership all along or an improvised change in operational tactics remains unknown.

In any case, the initiative in this direction has currently been seized by Russian troops, who will attempt to recover their positions and set up defenses along the Seversky Donets–Donbass canal. This would secure the area around Artemovsk and deprive the Ukrainian army of its staging area.

In order to do so, however, the Russians will need to occupy Ukrainian strongpoints near the village of Ivanovskoye, which PMC Wagner units could not seize during their attempt to encircle Artemovsk. At the time, however, it was a critically important zone for both sides, and both the Russian and Ukrainian armies concentrated their firepower there. Now, the priorities have shifted and Artemovsk – despite continuing to be the site of daily battles – is considered a direction of secondary importance.

Vladislav Ugolny, Russian journalist and military analyst, born in Donetsk. In the past, he served as a militia member of the Lugansk People’s Republic.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/11/ ... s-endgame/

*******

Of Course, It Is Not An Option.

Since Kuleba talks about it, it means it was proposed on many occasions. Not by Russia, of course, by NATO itself.

The idea that Ukraine could cede territories that it lost to Russia in exchange for NATO membership remains unacceptable, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba told journalists on the sidelines of a NATO meeting in Brussels on Wednesday. The idea has been floated by former senior NATO officials, including ex-Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and ex-Supreme Allied Commander Europe James Stavridis. Kuleba blasted the proposal ahead of a NATO-Ukraine Council of foreign ministers. Supporters of the plan should tell other nations to make similar concessions, “and if they do so, then I am ready to listen to their arguments,” he said. The minister also dismissed the notion that there was “fatigue” with the conflict in Western nations, insisting that a shortage of arms deliveries was not related to it.

In regards to fatigue, as many already noticed and it was documented through videos--the number of women from 404 killed at the front lines is rather large. If that hasn't been enough, here is a peculiar, very 404 document:

Image

It is a medical certificate (affidavit) issued to VSU guy that although he has above third of his calf amputated, he is just fine, he is still good for military service, albeit in limited capacity. Hey, not biggie! He still got hands, you know.



(more...)

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2023/11 ... ption.html

*******

Ukraine Finally Starts To Build Defense Lines

After wasting ten-thousands of men in hopeless battles the Ukrainian comedian has finally acknowledged that his army's performative 'counter-attacks' and hold-to-the-last-man defenses have made no sense.

Politco's Dreamer of the year finally calls for building defensive lines:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called for a faster buildup of major defensive lines amid Kyiv’s stalled counteroffensive and concerns that Russia could attempt to take more territory.
Zelenskiy urged greater speed and efficiency in building defenses in a video statement on Telegram after a meeting with key military and security officials Tuesday evening. He encouraged local communities to pitch in and pledged to make money available for the effort.

“Our country will definitely have enough mines and concrete,” he said. He didn’t provide details on where the fortifications would be built or how extensive they might be.


It took the Russian army several months and lots of money to build its extensive defense lines in the southeast of Ukraine.

Zelenski has neither the time nor the money to build solid lines but he wants many of them (machine translation):

According to Zelensky, he held a meeting on fortification in all major directions – first of all on Avdiivka and Maryinsky, as well as on Kupyansk and on the Kupyansk – Liman line, in Zaporozhye and Kherson regions.
In addition, fortifications will be built along the entire border with Russia and Belarus.

"We will work with our partners to strengthen our defensive lines," the president added.

Earlier, Zelensky already spoke about a "special" meeting of the Stavka, where they discussed strengthening the fortification.


Comments Strana (machine translation):

This is quite a landmark statement. It sounds like an announcement of the construction of large-scale defensive lines-similar to the one that Russia has built in the south.
And more broadly, this can be interpreted as a transition to a defensive strategy, which began to be talked about more and more often after the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine actually stopped, and the Russians themselves switched to large-scale attacks.

But officially, the authorities do not talk about the transition to defense, and the main thesis remains that the APU is preparing to attack, and there is no deadlock (which even the commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny wrote about) at the front.


Zelenski called for private companies to build the new fortifications. In the context of Ukraine that means more corruption - lots of it - as government officials will ask for kick backs for any contract they may sign. Previous attempts of privately build defense lines had ditches that were too shallow and of little utility. Some concrete was poured but in the wrong places and shapes.

There were reasons why Ukraine failed last summer to overcome the Russian defense lines. It lacked the artillery support, air-superiority and sheer mass that is required to achieve that. But Russia has all of that - an enormous amount of heavy siege artillery (200 mm and beyond), a ridiculous superiority in the number of unmanned drones and manned fighter planes and lots of new contract soldiers. Any lines the Ukrainians can build will be overcome by superior Russian forces.

Yes, passing Ukrainian minefields will be difficult. But there are ways and means to do such.

Thanks to its previous lunatic attempts the Ukrainian army has lost too many men to hold each and every line. And while the Ukrainian army will have to defend everywhere, the Russia one can choose the one or two local fronts where it wants to breach the defense lines to pass through them.

What is planned now is too little too late to save Ukraine.

Posted by b on December 1, 2023 at 14:13 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/12/u ... l#comments
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Dec 02, 2023 6:27 pm

Spiders in Glass Jar: Ze Desperately Buys Time as Enemies Plot

SIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
DEC 1, 2023

A clearer picture of the outlook for the next term of the war is starting to resolve before us. We’ve long reported rumors that the issue of offense vs. defense had become a breaking point between Zelensky and Zaluzhny, and now Zelensky has finally bitten the bullet and announced a full change of posture to a defensive one, with the mandate to begin building vast fortifications and defenses all throughout Ukraine: (Video at link)


This comes at a critical time where each side seeks to out-maneuver the other in the great game of the Ukrainian throne. There are many side developments in relation to this, so let’s untangle the deep web.

Right now in the Ukrainian establishment, things are fracturing into two sides, as Zelensky backers get behind their breadwinner while the military class files behind Zaluzhny.

Yermak is said to be implementing a shadowy campaign to slowly discredit and dispose Zaluzhny. That’s because Zelensky has decided it is, for now, too impractical and dangerous to get rid of Zaluzhny outright as the general has fortified himself with a shield of strong backers. Particularly, there have been announcements from military unions that they will “take up arms” if Zaluzhny is removed.

"Our source in the OP said that the SBU sent an urgent report to Bankova about the reaction of units at the front and in the body to Bezuglaya’s statement about Zaluzhny’s resignation. The military is ready to oppose the authorities if he tries to dismiss the Commander-in-Chief, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are completely on the side of Zaluzhny in the conflict with Zelensky."

And:

⚡️⚡️⚡️#Insider information
Our source in the OP said that the President's Office is not happy with the situation with Zaluzhny, who is supported by internal actors: oligarchs/patriots/soros / opposition. In this case, the interests of foreign policy players who protect the Commander-in-Chief and do not allow him to be dismissed for a year have converged. In fact, the situation completely repeats the track of 2019, when a broad coalition formed against Poroshenko, which Zelensky took advantage of.


So instead, Yermak is overseeing a slow campaign to discredit their primary competitor. But it’s not going well—at least yet—because latest opinion polls of public sentiment have found Zaluzhny is now vastly outperforming Zelensky:

Image

Trust ratings for Zaluzhny surpass those of Zelensky.

The Ukrainian channel "ZeRada" obtained confidential data from a November social study, conducted in Ukraine by order of the American USAID: When this data was seen in the Office of the President, panic began there.

One of the painful findings for the OP is that Zaluzhny's trust level is already higher than Zelensky's! The level of trust in Za is 82% and in Ze 72%! Moreover, Arestovich ranks third in terms of confidence.

When sociologists model the second round of the presidential elections, Zaluzhny wins the election over Zelensky with a result of 44%: 38%! At the same time, 8% had difficulty answering (and let's remember what that means).

Zaluzhny's conditional party also wins in the parliamentary elections: 31.5% of those who have decided are "for". The Zelensky conditional bloc will take 21.7%, and the Servant of the People 5.4% (this is also a sensation)!

That is why Bankova decided to launch a massive media attack against both Zaluzhny and the leadership of the Ukrainian Armed Forces as a whole. And the little box just opened


That means were the elections to be held now, Zaluzhny would likely win. So yesterday Zelensky finally had the Verkhovna Rada officially sign off on a law prohibiting presidential elections for a term lasting until six months after the cessation of martial law, which would only likely come after the end of the war itself. Thus Zelensky has now fortified himself legally and has sent a major message of resistance to Washington, that he won’t be rolled over that easily.

This means that Zelensky will now begin presenting a major problem to his Western controllers, as he’s quickly becoming unhealthily intransigent and defiant.

But to get back—Yermak has reportedly been using one of his key underlings, Rada deputy Mariana Bezuglaya to discredit Zaluzhny. She’s done this by repeatedly posting defamatory content about the general, even calling for him to resign due to “not having a military plan for 2024”:

Image

One of the theories is that this is a ploy to try and get Zaluzhny to openly engage with her in a back and forth which will “drag him in the muck,” and give raison d’etre for the Rada to openly discuss his case and potentially publicly censure him.

Instead Zaluzhny has played it smart by ‘insulating’ himself entirely from the political class. In fact, there still appears to be no contact between him and Zelensky. Zelensky just published a new video of himself visiting the Zaporozhye HQ from whence he later declared his new ‘defensive’ reorientation, and Zaluzhny was conspicuously missing amongst the wide array of general staff present (Umerov, Tarnovsky, Sirsky, etc.).

As a side note, check Zelensky’s face during the meeting:
Image

Zaluzhny’s absence was pointed out by “Yermak agent” Bezuglaya:

Image

She made a comment on facebook agreeing with someone pointing out that Zaluzhny was missing from this Stavka meeting, and Zaluzhny himself subsequently “reacted” to her comment with a smiley face, which can be seen below. Yes, this is what things have devolved into—high school social media intrigues! That’s Ukraine, folks.

But the point is, Zaluzhny is apparently being ‘goaded’ into the open. Now we have the following rumor:

Bankovaya went further in the backroom war against Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny and forbade all heads of military administrations (governors) to communicate with him, or mention his name, etc., just so as not to pump up his popularity in society.
The goal is simple: cross him out altogether, since" hero one " is Zelensky, the rest are just pawns in the game.
But when the question comes to responsibility, the Bankova System, on the contrary, pushes the blame on everyone except itself and Ze. Here is such a clumsy manipulation.


If that wasn’t bad enough, Poroshenko was caught on a leaked call speaking with the Ukrainian oligarch, Rinat Akhmetov, where he appeared to desperately call for immediate “action” to be taken. Here’s a rough auto-translation: (Video at link.)


The below clarifies some of the inconsistencies of the AI translation above:

Panic among Ukrainian oligarchs.

“The President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky and his team must be overthrown immediately, otherwise the Banderaites will lose the war against Russia, and the moneybags protecting them will lose everything they have acquired through dishonest labor.”

Ex-President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko spoke about this in a telephone conversation with oligarch Rinat Akhmetov.

A recording of their conversation was published in the Ukrainian segment of social networks. It is interesting that the current Rada deputy and former President of Ukraine, who became famous in the field of fighting everything Russian, conducts business conversations in Russian.

Poroshenko: “Rinat Leonidovich, these are difficult times, and the time has come to change the situation. I had a conversation with our friends, with our older brothers, so to speak. Shtepsel and Tarapunka, with the letter “E”, are preparing to go to Washington to negotiate. But in principle, nothing will work out for them, because they are tired of them, just like they are tired of this whole situation. And they very directly hinted to me that it was necessary...”

Akhmetov (interrupts): “Alekseevich, I understand that they are hinting to you, but without a guarantee I don’t even want to discuss anything. I understand what you’re getting at, Ermak and the others are tired of everyone.”

Akhmetov began to complain that the air defense systems transferred by the West were unable to protect his facilities, and therefore the oligarch was suffering huge losses, but Poroshenko promised full support from the West - any support except financial.

Poroshenko: “Our friends fully support us... There will be help, I promise you. We need to resolve an important issue. Our friends hinted that they themselves have a lot of problems, and we need to support them with our own efforts to invest. Rinat, if we don’t resolve this situation, then nothing will save your networks or our business. The Russians [referring to Zelensky’s government] will not negotiate with them.”

But Akhmetov rudely replied that he was not going to negotiate anything with the Russians, and the guarantees and promises of the West could not be trusted at all - they deceived everyone who came into contact with them.

Poroshenko: “Rinat, I understand. But either we are doing something now and we have a chance to come to an agreement, stop it and save it. Or we will have nothing left."

He emphasized that Valery Zaluzhny and the military are “with them” and are just waiting for a decision, as well as the financial support that they will have to provide to the Ukrainian oligarchs.

Poroshenko: “Our friends said that they had already invested a lot, they covered us too much, negotiated for us with the Russians. Now we need to take everything into our own hands, decisions. We will agree, but we need to act, there is no time.”

Akhmetov said he would think about it and asked for a personal meeting.


So, if this call is not ‘fake’, it represents a gradual maneuvering of Poroshenko, potentially allied with Zaluzhny and other “American backers” to oust Zelensky. Ironically, this is an almost inverse repeat of what happened in 2019 when it was actually Zelensky maneuvering to oust the increasingly unpopular Poroshenko with his own breed of backers.

Some have taken it further, with popular channel ZeRada claiming that the structure for the new post-Zelensky ouster is already being decided:

🧩🇺🇦🧩 American transfer: Zaluzhny, Stefanchuk, Razumkov‼️

It's important for the White House to end the conflict in Ukraine as quickly as possible because:

✅ they realize that there will be no better opportunity than now, any delay will lead to aggravation of Ukraine's situation, and they need it strong - to put pressure on Moscow in the future;

✅ it is important for them to keep as many Ukrainian assets as possible, which will make it easier to service debts to BlackRock, which according to the plan should consolidate Ukraine's liabilities. The more factories and businesses that remain in operation, the easier it will be for external players to support Ukraine.

Therefore, the transfer of power from Ze, who does not intend neither to surrender power nor to sign peace should be sharp to offset the risks of losing additional territories.

We have already written that Zaluzhny will fulfill the role of power guarantor, but the key body will be the Rada. That's why Stratfor is meeting with Stefanchuk, a lot will depend on the speaker. In fact, many "servants" are oriented on him, who will need to be convinced of the right position at the "moment C".

At the same time Poroshenko wants to become speaker and acting President, but the Embassy considers this option too risky. Petro Poroshenko has a very high anti-rating, which may have a bad effect on the mood of both military and civilian.

If Stefanchuk suddenly refuses to move towards peace, they are preparing a replacement for him. The only candidate in the Rada with a low anti-Razumkov rating among the people can be considered to be Dmytro Razumkov.

It is the pair Razumkov (acting president) - Zaluzhny (commander-in-chief) that the Americans consider the most optimal for transfer.

An important factor is that Dmitry headed the list of "Servants" in 2019, so he has influence in the faction and really enjoys respect among deputies.

To make the structure stable, Klitschko (local councils) will join the tandem, as well as support from Poroshenko (agreed) and Tymoshenko (she is not going anywhere).

At the first stage, a government of people's unity will be formed from the majority of factions, which should consolidate society for a while.

So far so good.


So, according to this, the Americans are leaning toward Razumkov as acting president with Zaluzhny as perhaps true power behind the throne. Poroshenko is desperately trying to maneuver himself into the presidency or at least Speaker, but apparently he’s considered too high of a risk due to potential unpopularity.

Interestingly, Poroshenko had an important series of meetings in Washington on December 4th where he was likely hoping to ‘iron out’ some of the above movements:

Image

And lo and behold, Zelensky issued a secret decree to stop Poroshenko—once again—from leaving the country. Despite having a Rada-sanctioned order allowing him to pass the checkpoint, Poroshenko was stopped and barred from leaving into Poland by motor vehicle: (Video at link.)


It’s said that it was specifically a secret order straight from Zelensky.

Poroshenko’s trip to the USA was canceled on the basis of a “classified secret” letter, - Vice Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Kornienko

“ According to our internal principles, participation in party events is allowed, but when a letter arrived for official use, which I cannot comment on , we were forced to cancel this business trip,” he said.


Now, to add to this sizzling drama, Seymour Hersh has come out with the claim—as always, originating from his “sources”—that Zaluzhny may in fact be secretly negotiating with Russia behind the scenes, with a direct Gerasimov-Zaluzhny line:

Secret negotiations? American journalist Seymour Hersh claims, citing anonymous US officials, that Russia and Ukraine are allegedly conducting secret peace negotiations along the Gerasimov-Zaluzhny line, despite the objections of Zelensky and the White House.

In an article on the Substack platform, Hersh wrote that the issue of possible fixation of borders along the current front line with the retention of Crimea and the liberated territories of the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions for the Russian Federation is allegedly being discussed; in exchange, an option is being considered in which Kiev could join NATO, but with a commitment that the alliance will not station troops or offensive weapons there.

“The American official said that Zelensky was made to understand that it was not him, but “the military that would solve this problem, and negotiations would continue with or without you.” “If necessary, we will pay for your trip to the Caribbean,” the American official told me,” wrote Hersh.


Two things:

Firstly, many have understandably rolled their eyes at the claim that Russia is ready to give Ukraine the NATO allowance, or is content to simply walk away with Crimea and Donbass. But keep in mind, since this was relayed to Hersh through an alleged “American official,” it likely represents just the American side’s offers, not what the Russian side is necessarily actually willing to accept—but who knows.

Either way, I’ve already written previously about how Zaluzhny may be used as the sort of ‘Russian asset’ to bring peace, because he doesn’t want his troops being needlessly killed. He can be lured with the promise of resuming the conflict later, after much NATO rearming.

In fact, I read a new report which seems completely believable given the somewhat ‘strange’ and inconsistent tactics of the grand counteroffensive, that essentially Zaluzhny in some ways ‘threw’ the offensive. Not deliberately sabotaged it per se—but rather that Zelensky really wanted an “all in” approach, maximum meat sacrificed, while Zaluzhny played it extremely safe after the disastrous opening, where the 47th and other brigades were mauled, with the famous Leopard/Bradley orgies of destruction. If you’ve noticed, since that point, the offensive devolved into a very cagey company-at-a-time approach that seemed more like an endless probative action rather than full on multi-brigade combined arms maneuvers into one direction. According to this opinion, this was a deliberate attempt of Zaluzhny’s to countervail the ‘orders of sacrifice’ and save as many men as possible.

Zaluzhny has been known to be the one calling for defensive fortifications and a retreat from various blood-baths like Bakhmut and Avdeevka, while Zelensky has always pushed forward to not give an inch, same as currently happening in Avdeevka. So it seems Zaluzhny has always been the one most amenable to whatever will save the men’s lives.

Now onto the second thing regarding Hersh’s claims. The confidante made some tongue-in-cheek mention of Zelensky’s ‘trip to the Caribbean’ being prepared. Ironically, a new such report actually did hit the streets, which claims that a secret operation is already underway to prepare Zelensky’s relocation to the U.S.

Image

A US Secret Service agent who wished to remain anonymous has revealed to DCWeekly details about the arrangements being made for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s relocation to the United States. The agent claims that the Biden administration has issued orders to ensure the safety and accommodation of President Zelensky’s family starting in the spring of 2024. This decision is based on the belief that Zelensky’s presidency in Ukraine may conclude next year, and remaining in Ukraine thereafter could pose security risks.

The audio message published from Youtube: (Audio at link.)


Granted, much of this is highly speculative and uncorroborated, however it clearly falls within the realm of reason. Also, many of the ‘rumors’ I’ve sourced thus far, come from channels which have recently been vindicated and validated. For instance, Resident/Legitimate channel were first to report weeks ago—which I relayed in my own reports—that Zaluzhny was pushing to build defensive fortifications, and a defensive reorientation in general; now Zelensky himself has officially acquiesced.

Anyway, some of this is further supported by the new statements from Zelensky’s wife, who says she doesn’t want him to run for any re-election:
(Video at link.)

So, is Zelensky being given an “easy out” corridor in order to soften him up for removal?

Let me add that there has been an increasing volume of voices from the Russian side pointing to the complete disavowal of any potential ceasefires. All the usuals like Medvedev and co. have been barking but there’s been a few interesting new additions. For instance, Russian deputy foreign minister Ryabkov said there’ll be no ceasefire in all of 2024:

Image
Source

Furthermore, Kherson governor Vladimir Saldo said he spoke with Putin directly who reassured him that all of Kherson would be retaken, and appeared to imply that Odessa and Nikolayev would as well.

Meanwhile, Putin’s assistant Surkov wrote a brief epistle with the following:

“Twilight on the Farm”: Vladislav Surkov, assistant to the President of Russia, wrote a column about how and why Ukraine will end.

“Belief in magic is part of Ukrainian political culture. Now Ukrainians are once again beginning to become disillusioned with their sorcerers. Twilight. Eve of darkness. There won't be a miracle. Many on Bankova secretly dream of Minsk-3. In vain. And there will be no Minsk-3.

Russia is no longer a mediator, patiently sorting out neighborly squabbles. Russia is now an impatient participant in the great struggle, which will take its toll. Understand, pagans. Next year will be a year of degradation and disorganization of the Ukrainian fake “state.”


Finally, there is one last very significant perspective that I’ve actually forgotten to add to this episode’s entire outlook in most of my reporting on it thus far. Many will recall that Soros recently visited Kiev, with Yermak posting photos of the warm reception he bestowed on the new head of the Soros empire.

This leads to one of the most important aspects: which is that Zelensky and co. are fully entwined with the Soros/BlackRock/criminal globalist cartel, and have been busy making secret deals to sell off Ukraine’s most vital national ‘organs’ in exchange for various financial promises. Recall in the earlier ZeRada report, it said:

✅ it is important for them to keep as many Ukrainian assets as possible, which will make it easier to service debts to BlackRock, which according to the plan should consolidate Ukraine's liabilities. The more factories and businesses that remain in operation, the easier it will be for external players to support Ukraine.

But now a new eye-opening report has shed light on what some of those secret deals were about:

Image

A high-ranking Ukrainian official disclosed a secret agreement between Soros Foundation and the administration of the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky. Information by a French journalist indicates that Soros Foundation has served as an intermediary between Zelensky’s office and Western chemical companies Vitol, Dow, and Dupont, which concluded a deal to dispose toxic waste on the territory of Ukraine. For an unknown reason, fertile lands of Western Ukraine were chosen as chemical waste landfills. This can have a critical impact on the quality of the local grain and cause famine in Europe, Africa, and Middle East.

Those interested can read the full lowdown in the report here. https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/11/29 ... rt-proofs/

Whether it’s true or not, the fact remains that we know from earlier confirmed findings that many of these conglomerates have been slowly moving into Ukraine, particularly for the farmland, in recent years.

This puts a potential ceasefire in a whole different perspective. Recall in a recent report that I wrote about how the reason U.S. cannot allow Russia to continue fighting is because it risks losing all of Ukraine in a total, decisive Russian victory over the embattled country.

This adds even more weight to this, as BlackRock, Dupont, Soros, and co., cannot allow their vast investment projects in Ukraine to completely fall into Russia’s hands. That means for these megacorp powerhouses, a ceasefire that preserves their holdings is of paramount importance. If Washington and the CIA won’t do the dirty work of ridding Ukraine of whomever may be holding up that process, then certainly these nefarious and shadowy organizations will gladly oblige.

Recall in the earlier Poroshenko leak, the oligarch Akhmetov groused about everything they own being wiped out by this war. Like I said, this adds a whole other dimension to developments, as I highly doubt these all-powerful consortiums will allow Ukraine to fall into the enemy’s hands, losing billions in investments and the control of such a critical piece of the ‘world’s breadbasket’ and unregulated dumping ground.


So where does that leave things?

Let’s summarize:

Zelensky needs to get rid of rising competitor Zaluzhny, but has decided it’s too risky to do it now, instead resolving on a long-term campaign to slowly discredit him so that once a few more ‘losses’ accumulate—like Avdeevka—they can be blamed on Zaluzhny to throw him under the bus.

In the meantime, Zelensky has switched to full conservation mode to preserve his forces, going onto the defensive to buy himself time. He has defiantly signaled to the West—thus far at least—that he won’t roll over, actualizing a Rada vote to fully legitimize the total annulment of elections. This is a form of brinksmanship, where Zelensky is challenging the West in order to basically say: “See, I won’t give this up. We have to take this to the end. So either fully fund me and get this show back on the road, or I will run this train off the tracks to such an extent that it will destroy you as well.”

Recall that losing this war in a ‘decisive’ manner would be disastrous for Washington and the sitting administration. So Zelensky is calling Washington’s bluff to force them to re-engage. This is supported by the fact that in the interim, Zelensky has been hard at work trying to reach out to the Republican party in order to dissolve the blockade on his cash flow. You see, Zelensky still believes there’s a good chance to get that massive windfall awaiting him—and he may be right. That’s why going on defense is a smart move to buy him time, as he can work on getting that money unlocked, which could be big enough ($60B+) to fund major military operations through the ensuing year.

At the same time, he’s gotten cagey and highly paranoid. Rumors claim that even on his recent trips abroad, he refused to eat any food given to him without testing it for various toxins and chemicals as he appears aware he’s on the chopping block.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/spi ... esperately

(Much more at link, do look.)

******

Ukraine Is Bracing For A Possible Russian Counteroffensive By Fortifying The Entire Front

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
DEC 2, 2023

To summarize: 1) Ukraine is bracing for a Russian counteroffensive by fortifying the entire front; 2) that scenario could be averted, however, by freezing the conflict; 3) but Zelensky refuses to do so due to his messianic delusions of victory despite sobering up a bit lately; 4) A Russian breakthrough could prompt NATO to directly intervene in Ukraine out of desperation to stop it if the front collapses; but 5) since this entails great risks, the US hopes that the secret Zaluzhny-Gerasimov talks will freeze the conflict first.

“Zelensky’s Latest Interview With The Associated Press Suggests That He’s Sobering Up A Bit” after he finally acknowledged the failure of summer’s counteroffensive. Truth be told, he already signaled as much several days prior in his nightly address to the nation on Thursday, which the Wall Street Journal raised awareness of afterwards in their article about it here. What he said was so significant that the relevant excerpts will be shared in full below prior to analyzing them in the larger context of this conflict:

“In all major areas where we need to boost and accelerate the construction of structures. Of course, these are primarily Avdiivka, Maryinka and other areas in Donetsk region that will receive maximum attention. Kharkiv region – the direction of Kupyansk, as well as the Kupyansk – Lyman defense line. The entire Kharkiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Rivne, and Volyn regions, as well as the south – Kherson region.

There were reports from regional authorities, all the relevant military commanders. Defense Minister Umerov, General Pavliuk.

We discussed the mobilization of resources, the motivation of private business in this work, and financing. The priority is obvious. I am grateful to everyone working on this kind of construction, in the production of materials. We also discussed the needs that we will address with our partners to reinforce our defense lines.”


It was assessed a little over a week ago that “NATO’s Proxy War On Russia Through Ukraine Appears To Be Winding Down” for the myriad reasons explained in the preceding hyperlinked analysis, not least of which was Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny candidly admitting that the conflict is at a stalemate. The subsequent exacerbation of his long-simmering rivalry with Zelensky destabilized the political situation behind the front lines and led to the latest Russian spy hysteria that’s dividing Ukraine’s security services.

“Politico Just Dumped On Zelensky” by openly mocking him as “Dreamer No. 1” in the world in their latest feature article about the Ukrainian leader, which was then followed by The Economist declaring that “Putin seems to be winning the war in Ukraine—for now”. The latter outlet was the one to whom Zaluzhny admitted that the conflict is at a stalemate, and they themselves also admitted a week prior to their aforementioned piece that “Russia is starting to make its superiority in electronic warfare count”.

Their report came over two months after the New York Times confirmed that Russia had won the “race of logistics”/ “war of attrition” that NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg declared in mid-February. That same official and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba also unintentionally admitted last week that Russia is stronger than NATO. All of this set the narrative-strategic stage for Zelensky’s nightly address to the nation where he ordered the construction of defensive fortifications all across the front.

From everything that led up to this development, it’s obvious that Ukraine is now bracing for a possible Russian counteroffensive, which can’t be taken for granted but also can’t be ruled out either. So long as he refuses to comply with the West’s reported pressure upon him to recommence talks with Russia aimed at freezing the conflict in order to avert that scenario, then it’ll continue hanging over his country’s like a Damocles’ sword.

Time Magazine quoted one of his unnamed senior advisors in late October who accused the Ukrainian leader of having messianic delusions of victory that account for his series of missteps over the months. This description is applicable when it comes to explaining his refusal to recommence talks with Russia even in spite of Bild reporting that the US and Germany are rationing their arms deliveries as part of a plan to pressure him in this direction. Instead of de-escalating the conflict, he’s now digging it.

NATO might help Ukraine reinforce its defenses along the entire front per Zelensky’s request to his “partners” that he revealed in his nightly address to the nation last week, but its members’ resources are more limited than ever due to over 21 months of proxy warfare depleting their reserves. They also fear that whatever they give Ukraine might still not be enough to prevent any Russian breakthrough in the coming future, the scenario of which could then prompt them to directly intervene out of desperation.

That’s precisely what they want to avoid since it would spike the risk of World War III by miscalculation, but at the same time, they also couldn’t sit back and let Russia steamroll across Ukraine either. The most pragmatic way to resolve this increasingly dangerous security dilemma is to freeze the conflict as soon as possible like they’re trying their utmost to do right now via their pressure on Zelensky. Since he still refuses to comply, however, they’re reportedly begun exploring alternative means to that same end.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh just published a paywalled article on Friday in which he cited unnamed sources, including a US official per TASS’ summary of his claims here, to inform readers that Zaluzhny has entered into secret US-backed talks with his Russian counterpart Gerasimov. According to him, they’re working on a pragmatic series of compromises aimed at freezing the conflict, though the details thereof remain unconfirmed and could obviously change. These talks could also possibly fail, too.

While some might doubt that they’re even taking place, everything that was earlier described regarding the events that preceded Zelensky’s order to fortify the entire front extends credence to Hersh’s report. Supplementary evidence in support of this conclusion can be seen from what the deputy head of the Ukrainian parliament’s security, defense and intelligence committee admitted last week in her post on Facebook about how Zaluzhny supposedly doesn’t have any plan whatsoever for next year.

Considering that he was the first Ukrainian official to admit that the counteroffensive failed, and no one knows Ukraine’s military-strategic difficulties better than him, it therefore makes sense that he might have reached out to Gerasimov about a ceasefire after Zelensky refused to recommence peace talks. Furthermore, keeping in mind America’s interest in freezing the conflict as was argued in this analysis, it could very well have told Zaluzhny to hold such secret talks and would naturally back them if they exist.

To summarize: 1) Ukraine is bracing for a Russian counteroffensive by fortifying the entire front; 2) that scenario could be averted, however, by freezing the conflict; 3) but Zelensky refuses to do so due to his messianic delusions of victory despite sobering up a bit lately; 4) A Russian breakthrough could prompt NATO to directly intervene in Ukraine out of desperation to stop it if the front collapses; but 5) since this entails great risks, the US hopes that the secret Zaluzhny-Gerasimov talks will freeze the conflict first.

A lot can still happen to offset the conflict’s latest de-escalation trajectory, including false flag attacks by Zelensky’s allies in Ukraine and those among the Western military-intelligence agencies that have self-interested reasons in perpetuating this proxy war, but the latest developments still inspire tepid optimism. It’s premature to expect that a ceasefire might be right around the corner, let alone to begin speculating about its terms, but observers should still prepare themselves for this possibility just in case.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraine- ... a-possible

In the event of a major Russian breakthrough(which I expect) I doubt the NATO reaction would be 'all in'. Rather the jackals(Poland, Hungary and Romania) might occupy those territories which Stalin apportioned to Ukraine after WWII. The tattered remains of the UAF would be left to occupy the remains, essentially 17th century Ukraine as it was before Russia and the Soviet Union enlarged it. That'll teach em.

*******

Ukraine Finally Starts To Build Defense Lines

After wasting ten-thousands of men in hopeless battles the Ukrainian comedian has finally acknowledged that his army's performative 'counter-attacks' and hold-to-the-last-man defenses have made no sense.

Politco's Dreamer of the year finally calls for building defensive lines:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called for a faster buildup of major defensive lines amid Kyiv’s stalled counteroffensive and concerns that Russia could attempt to take more territory.
Zelenskiy urged greater speed and efficiency in building defenses in a video statement on Telegram after a meeting with key military and security officials Tuesday evening. He encouraged local communities to pitch in and pledged to make money available for the effort.

“Our country will definitely have enough mines and concrete,” he said. He didn’t provide details on where the fortifications would be built or how extensive they might be.


It took the Russian army several months and lots of money to build its extensive defense lines in the southeast of Ukraine.

Zelenski has neither the time nor the money to build solid lines but he wants many of them (machine translation):

According to Zelensky, he held a meeting on fortification in all major directions – first of all on Avdiivka and Maryinsky, as well as on Kupyansk and on the Kupyansk – Liman line, in Zaporozhye and Kherson regions.
In addition, fortifications will be built along the entire border with Russia and Belarus.

"We will work with our partners to strengthen our defensive lines," the president added.


Earlier, Zelensky already spoke about a "special" meeting of the Stavka, where they discussed strengthening the fortification.

Comments Strana (machine translation):

This is quite a landmark statement. It sounds like an announcement of the construction of large-scale defensive lines-similar to the one that Russia has built in the south.

And more broadly, this can be interpreted as a transition to a defensive strategy, which began to be talked about more and more often after the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine actually stopped, and the Russians themselves switched to large-scale attacks.

But officially, the authorities do not talk about the transition to defense, and the main thesis remains that the APU is preparing to attack, and there is no deadlock (which even the commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny wrote about) at the front.


Zelenski called for private companies to build the new fortifications. In the context of Ukraine that means more corruption - lots of it - as government officials will ask for kick backs for any contract they may sign. Previous attempts of privately build defense lines had ditches that were too shallow and of little utility. Some concrete was poured but in the wrong places and shapes.

There were reasons why Ukraine failed last summer to overcome the Russian defense lines. It lacked the artillery support, air-superiority and sheer mass that is required to achieve that. But Russia has all of that - an enormous amount of heavy siege artillery (200 mm and beyond), a ridiculous superiority in the number of unmanned drones and manned fighter planes and lots of new contract soldiers. Any lines the Ukrainians can build will be overcome by superior Russian forces.

Yes, passing Ukrainian minefields will be difficult. But there are ways and means to do such.

Thanks to its previous lunatic attempts the Ukrainian army has lost too many men to hold each and every line. And while the Ukrainian army will have to defend everywhere, the Russia one can choose the one or two local fronts where it wants to breach the defense lines to pass through them.

What is planned now is too little too late to save Ukraine.

Posted by b on December 1, 2023 at 14:13 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/12/u ... l#comments

*******

The RF Armed Forces increase to 2,209,000 thousand people
December 1, 21:18

Image

A decree was signed on establishing the staffing level of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

Decree “On establishing the staffing level of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.”

In accordance with Article 4 of the Federal Law of May 31, 1996 No. 61-FZ “On Defense”, I decide:

1. Establish the staffing level of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the amount of 2,209,130 ​​units, including 1,320,000 military personnel.

2. The Government of the Russian Federation shall provide for the allocation to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of budgetary allocations from the federal budget necessary for the implementation of paragraph 1 of this Decree.

3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of August 25, 2022 No. 575 “On establishing the staffing level of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation” (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2022, No. 35, Art. 6068) shall be declared invalid.

4. This Decree comes into force from the date of its signing.

http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/news/72891 - zinc

PS. There were 2,039,758 people, of which 1,150,628 were military personnel
. As I have written more than once before, an increase in the RF Armed Forces due to the need to wage war in Ukraine and increase military capabilities on the borders with NATO is inevitable. And this is not the last increase in numbers.

PS2. It is also worth noting that today Medvedev announced that from 01/01/2023 to 12/01/2023, 452,000 people voluntarily entered the RF Armed Forces. Recruitment is actively continuing.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8800452.html

The growth of the US military-industrial complex in connection with the war in Ukraine
December 2, 12:15

Image

Increased defense spending in the United States after the start of the war in Ukraine.
At the same time, most of the money is spent in the United States on its own infrastructure and weapons production, that is, on the development of its military-industrial complex, which rises during the war. This was not a big secret, it was just more detailed and in numbers.

Image

Image

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8801046.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sun Dec 03, 2023 2:06 pm

The logic of proxy war
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/03/2023

Image

“Zelensky fears that the Israel-Hamas war could distract attention from Ukraine,” wrote on Friday the headline of The Hill , one of the many media outlets that echoed the president's words in an interview given to the AP as part of a broader report in which journalists have followed Zelensky on his last propaganda visit to the front. Ukraine is aware that it needs this type of public relations act, not only to place its speech in the press, but to remind the population of the countries that must continue financing the war that the conflict continues. “We have already seen the consequences of the change in the international community due to the tragedy in the Middle East,” Zelensky explains in the interview, adding that “only a blind man can not see it.”

In an outburst of sincerity no doubt planned, the Ukrainian president is aware of having to “fight for attention for the full-scale war.” The objective is clear, not to allow “people to forget about the war here.” The reason for this is even more obvious: “Look, attention equals help. If there is no care, that will mean there will be no help.” Zelensky is also aware of which country he has to appeal to. Without any real opposition in the European Union to continue spending on humanitarian, financial and military aid to Ukraine, kyiv is risking maintaining the level of income received from its partners in the United States, whose funds are, as John Kirby has been denouncing for weeks , about to run out. “Without attention, there may be weakness in Congress,” says Zelensky.

The AP report gives Ukraine some progress both on the front and in the form of destroying Russian naval power in the Black Sea, but admits that “the long-awaited counteroffensive, fueled by tens of billions of dollars of Western assistance that included heavy equipment, has not made the expected advances.” Hence, two fears arise for Ukraine that it does not want to face: the pressure from its partners to negotiate with Russia, something that Zelensky categorically rejects, and the lack of financing for future offensives.

In search of more money, the Ukrainian Government has managed numerous strategies over the last few months, but currently it seems to have chosen two paths to channel that objective: reproaching the West for not having delivered sufficient weapons with all the expected speed and danger of the Ukrainian defeat. Both arguments coexist perfectly with the idea of ​​certain victory that Ukraine uses internally. “We wanted faster results. From that point of view, unfortunately, we have not achieved the desired results,” says Zelensky, clinging to the idea that the plans are going ahead, although, as Ermak stated, they do so with a slight delay. Everything can be attributed to this lack of weapons, something that, in the Ukrainian imagination, can be solved in a simple way by compensating for current shortcomings with more weapons for future offensives so that 2024 is the turning point that the head of the President's Office is looking for. .

“There is not enough power to achieve the desired results faster,” Zelensky admits, again insisting that Ukraine “did not receive all the weapons we wanted. I can't be satisfied, but I can't complain too much either.” Ukraine is aware of the need to get the attention of its partners, to give them the necessary arguments to justify more assistance, but without alienating its political elites by demanding too much. That is the main consequence of Ukraine's political, economic, financial and industrial dependence at the moment.

Like Arajamia a week ago, Zelensky has also understood the need to recover military production. Until now, decentralization , that is, the complete dependence of the military industry on its partners, had been considered an advantage for Ukraine, since those factories were out of range of Russian missiles. However, now that European industry has proven not to be capable of providing the weapons and ammunition necessary to maintain a large-scale and extended war, kyiv insists on recovering that production.

The solution again involves greater dependence on its partners, since Ukraine can only resume production by installing foreign manufacturing - the German company Rheinmetall claims to be willing to produce in Ukraine, despite the fact that these facilities would immediately be considered a target for missiles. Russians - or to recreate their own industry through foreign credits. “Zelensky is looking for Western allies, including the United States, to offer favorable credits and contracts to achieve that goal,” AP writes. Ukraine, which inherited from the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic a powerful military industry that was ruined in the three decades of independence, wants to recover production based on Western dependence.

With the ability to constantly demand more aid, more funding and more favorable treatment, Ukraine is aware that it must offer something in return, even if it is an intangible such as protection. “In the case of Ukraine, if resilience fails now due to lack of aid and shortages of weapons and ammunition, that will mean that Russia will probably invade NATO countries,” Zelensky concludes to issue a final warning: “So, the American children will have to fight.”

The threat of a Russian invasion of NATO countries exists solely in the imagination of the Ukrainian scriptwriters, who, like the Biden administration, trust that it will achieve the desired effect on the Trumpist minority of the Republican Party. “If we don't get that support from Congress,” said John Kirby again in reference to the blocking of the funds requested by Joe Biden, “the message it will send to the whole world about how much Ukraine matters and how much the United States and “Our leadership can offer our partners around the world is going to be loud, clear and deeply unfortunate.” The logic of proxy war is now the only hope for Zelensky and Biden.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/03/la-lo ... rra-proxy/

Google Translator

Zelensky stinks of prey inches from the jaws of a predator, a situation considerably of his own invention. True, the motivating force of the US cannot be underestimated, yet every step of the way the Z has chosen escalation, and here we are, and here he is.

********

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 2
December 2, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Avdeevsky sector, fighting continues in the direction of Novokalinovo, Vodyanoye, Tonenkoye and in the vicinity of the coke plant. In addition, the RF Armed Forces managed to slightly expand the zone of control east of Stepovoy .

In the Soledar direction, Russian military personnel are advancing towards Krasnoye (Ivanovsky). In the area of ​​the gardening community not far from the village, the Russian Armed Forces carried out a daring attack and were able to push back the Ukrainian formations, taking up new positions. In addition, there are battles in the vicinity of Kleshcheevka and Bogdanovka .

In the Kherson direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are still holding a bridgehead in Krynki , periodically trying to take over landings near the populated area. The work of Russian troops in the area is complicated by the large number of enemy drones and problems with the density of electronic warfare equipment.

Towards evening, the enemy tried to attack the Krasnodar region with converted S-200 missiles, but air defense systems intercepted both ammunition over the Sea of ​​Azov.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
At the Kupyansky site , in the Ivanovka region , the rotation of the Armed Forces Troops Operations brigades was disrupted. Battles were also reported near Liman Pervy, Pershetravnevoy and on the eastern outskirts of Sinkovka . Meanwhile, in the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector, fighting was reported in the area of ​​the Tor salient . In addition, the Russian Armed Forces were able to expand the zone of control east of Ternov and Yampolovka .


In the Soledar direction, Russian troops are developing an offensive towards the village of Krasnoye (Ivanovskoye). According to colleagues from the NgP RaZVedka channel, the fighters managed to make a breakthrough towards the settlement and take the Ukrainian formations by surprise, which had to retreat as a result of the battle. The RF Armed Forces, in turn, are consolidating themselves in new positions and conducting counter-battery warfare. In addition, Russian military personnel are expanding the zone of control east of Bogdanovka and not far from the Vilnyan nursery.

Clashes continue on the southern flank at Kleshcheevka , but there are no changes on this section of the front yet.

Image
In the Avdeevsky sector, fighting is going on towards Novokalinovo, Severny, Tonenkoye and in the vicinity of the Avdeevsky coke plant. In addition, Russian military personnel slightly expanded the zone of control at Stepovoy . The command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, meanwhile, is transferring fresh forces from the Orekhovsky sector towards Krasnogorovka .


At the same time, as we wrote earlier, yesterday’s reports about the complete liberation of Marinka turned out to be premature: the Russian Armed Forces actually occupied several streets in the southwest of the city, but the enemy still maintains a presence in several houses on the northwestern outskirts of the village.


In the Orekhovsky sector, positional battles continue at the Rabotino-Verbovoy line. During the next attack of Ukrainian formations towards Verbovoy, fighters of the Russian Armed Forces knocked out one enemy tank and infantry fighting vehicle, after which the Ukrainian Armed Forces retreated to their original positions.


In the Kherson direction, clashes between Russian troops and Ukrainian marines in Krynki on the left bank of the Dnieper continue . The enemy continues to firmly hold the bridgehead he previously occupied, to which fresh forces and supplies are regularly transferred. The situation for the Russian Armed Forces is complicated by the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have a huge number of FPV drones in this area that interfere with the work of military personnel.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas
Ukrainian formations again tried to attack the Krasnodar region with missiles, but air defense systems intercepted both shells in the sky over the Sea of ​​Azov.

Ukrainian formations once again fired at the Glushkovsky district of the Kursk region. The enemy struck Tetkino : several buildings and two cars were damaged. In addition, a Ukrainian drone dropped an explosive device on Elizavetivka . Fortunately, in both cases there were no casualties or injuries.

Image
The enemy again fired at the Donetsk agglomeration. Arrivals were recorded in the Nikitovsky district of Gorlovka, Kievsky, Kuibyshevsky and Leninsky districts of Donetsk . In addition, the enemy actively used UAVs to attack residential areas of the DPR capital and neighboring settlements. The attacks killed one civilian and injured another.

Image
Today, the Ukrainian Armed Forces shelled the left bank of the Kherson region much more intensely than in previous days. Golay Pristan, Dnepryany, Kakhovka, Korsunka, Novaya Kakhovka and Proletarka were under enemy fire . In addition, two civilians from Aleshki and Cossack Camps were injured. The Gornostaevsky district was under enemy fire almost without a break for 24 hours: arrivals were recorded in Gornostaevka and Zavodovka , enemy UAVs were working over the villages.

Political events
About Soros's plans to dispose of hazardous waste in Ukraine

A story has spread in the Russian media about negotiations between Alexander Soros in the interests of Western companies that plan to dispose of hazardous waste in three regions of Ukraine . The original source is a video posted on X/Twitter by the account of an alleged French journalist named Jules Vincent. It claims that the deal was concluded between the son of George Soros and the head of the office of the President of Ukraine Andrey Ermak . Under its terms, American corporations - Dow Chemical, DuPont, BASF, Evonik Industries, Vitol and Sanofi - receive the right to bury hazardous waste from their production facilities in the Ternopil, Khmelnytsky and Chernivtsi regions free of charge and indefinitely.

On the one hand, with all due respect to Tarantino’s films , we are not ready to trust this particular story from an account named after the main characters of Pulp Fiction . On the other hand, a similar scenario for the development of events in the future is very likely. Let us remind you that foreign companies have been actively and successfully developing the vast expanses of Ukraine for several years: 52% of arable state lands already belong to the corporations Monsanto, Cargill and Dupont , and foreign producers are also interested in sowing Ukrainian fields with marijuana. And where the soil is worse, it means that waste can be buried there. Everything will be useful on the farm.

The failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive from a Western perspective

We are watching with curiosity how the West explains the failure of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ summer offensive. Former head of the CIA and vice president of the Royal Defense Studies Institute (RUSI), General David Petraeus , said that the reason was the slowness in allocating military aid to Ukraine, including Leopard tanks , Abrams tanks and cluster munitions. Everything would be fine, but I just want to ask: if deliveries were so delayed, then who then hurried the Ukrainian command and drove it to the assault? And who in the first half of the year stubbornly convinced everyone that the Russians would flee from just the sight of Western armored vehicles?

It’s not difficult to answer this question - just look at the same Petraeus’ interview at the end of 2022. There he spoke about the superiority of the “organized and well-coordinated” Armed Forces of Ukraine over Russian “untrained cannon fodder”, about “terrible Russian logistics” and even predicted the imminent collapse of the Russian Armed Forces from within. The reality, however, turned out to be completely different, and now the same professional experts are predictably busy shifting responsibility. For example, on mysterious nameless politicians or incorrectly fighting Ukrainian formations.

It is very convenient and even more profitable: it is not appropriate for eminent Western generals with many regalia to sign that the quality of their analytics turned out to be approximately at the level of thoughts of ordinary people on social networks.

About the latest trends in arms supplies to Ukraine

The German Federal Government has published information about the next military aid package, which includes:

3840 artillery shells of 155 mm caliber;

2 armored border vehicles;

1 mobile antenna mast;

25 laser rangefinders;

5 devices for detecting UAVs;

4 MAN HX81 8X8 truck tractors;

8 Zetros trucks;

3 cars;

15 HLR338 sniper rifles and 60 thousand rounds of ammunition

This is rather modest support, especially when compared with what was supplied to Ukraine at the beginning of this year. At the same time, the German company Rheinmetall announces plans to build the first armored vehicles next year. The plans of Western gunsmiths include the production of the Fox armored personnel carrier and the Lynx infantry fighting vehicle . Nevertheless, it is obvious that they will not limit themselves to the production of armored vehicles. Western politicians, after the failure of the Ukrainian summer offensive, have repeatedly stated the need to develop Ukrainian industry in order to get off the needle of Western supplies. This means that the Russian Aerospace Forces will have new legitimate targets for striking.

About the political risks of Zelensky's team

In recent days, Ukrainian society has increasingly begun to discuss the presidential elections in Ukraine in 2024, and to be more precise, the feasibility of holding these elections. This is due to the Verkhovna Rada’s declaration on preventing elections in the country until the end of hostilities. It is worth noting that there is no absolute consensus around the adoption of this document. In addition, the document is largely formal in nature and, if appropriate, allows the Office of the President (OP) to conduct elections bypassing the bill.

At the same time, the holding of presidential elections is denied at the official level. The OP refers primarily to martial law and the Ukrainian constitution, although in political circles they say that the matter is a little more complicated. It is worth understanding that it is not difficult or expensive for Zelensky’s team to organize and hold elections next year (especially since this show could please the Western public), but there is one problem - commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny .

The Ukrainian authorities practically do not hide the fact that there is a conflict between the president and the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And although Zaluzhny has not publicly declared his political ambitions, it is a matter of time (as well as the fact that the conflict will move into the open phase). And the Office of the President has something to fear. According to the Ukrainian sociological group “Rating”, Ukrainians’ trust in Zaluzhny exceeded the trust in Zelensky. It is noted that if elections were held in Ukraine tomorrow, both candidates would go to the second round.

In general, it is not surprising that the Ukrainian president recently accused Russia of plans to organize a coup d’etat ( “Maidan-3” ). At the moment, Zelensky’s team is in the most precarious position since the beginning of the Northern Military District. And, as often happens in Ukraine, yesterday’s political partners, allies and representatives of other political camps sense the weakness of presidential power. And it looks like the mayor of Kiev, Vitaliy Klitschko, is joining the coalition of “dissatisfied” . In a fresh interview with the German Der Spiegel, the Kiev mayor complained about the authoritarian tendencies of modern Ukraine: “At the moment, there is only one independent institution left, but it is under enormous pressure: local government... Ukraine is turning into a country where everything depends on the mood of one person.” .

Nevertheless, we should not forget that behind the same Klitschko, Arestovich or Zaluzhny there are very specific foreign interest groups. And it is their goals that determine preferences in who will govern Ukraine in a certain period of time.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

*******

Ukraine Another Historic U.S. War Failure a la Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and More

December 1, 2023

The war-indebted U.S. empire is faltering towards its historic and final demise. Every empire has its day in the sun.

The U.S.-led NATO alliance held its first NATO-Ukraine Council meeting this week in Brussels. As usual, the cliched promises of supporting the Kiev regime to the end were trotted out by all and sundry.

In truth, these NATO events for Ukraine, and more generally, are becoming yawn fests.

The whole sordid charade is only postponing the reality that the proxy war in Ukraine against Russia is a debacle for the Western powers. This is not something to gloat over. It is a tragedy and an abomination.

Up to 400,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed, as well as tens of thousands of Russian military personnel. Total casualty figures are no doubt in the millions. In addition, millions of civilians have been displaced as refugees in Russia and throughout Europe. Hundreds of billions of dollars and euros have been raided from Western taxpayers to fund this bloody fiasco. Not only that but international tensions have been heightened between nuclear powers at a perilous pitch not seen since the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 at the depth of the Cold War.

Washington needs to come to its senses and negotiate a peaceful settlement on Moscow’s terms. It’s as simple and as blunt as that. This is what could have been achieved before the conflict erupted in February 2022 when Moscow was offering a negotiable security treaty. The West rejected those terms out of hand back then. Now it will have to accept. Primarily, the conditions are that there will be no further NATO enlargement around Russia’s borders and in particular there will be no inclusion of Ukraine in the American-led bellicose military bloc.

Attending the NATO summit this week was U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken along with Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba and the foreign ministers of the other 30 NATO member states. Kuleba declared with delusional disconnect: “We are pretty much becoming a de facto NATO army.” He may be somewhat correct that Ukraine has been used as a proxy force for NATO, but it is a spent and decimated one.

Blinken seemed to be concerned with papering over cracks appearing in various media reports indicating that the U.S. is surreptitiously telling the Kiev regime to cut its losses and make a sort of peace deal with Russia. Blinken’s bravado rhetoric is akin to empty U.S. promises previously made to Afghanistan and countless other proxy regimes over the decades before Washington ignominiously pulls the plug and does a runner.

Inviting Ukraine to a NATO council summit is all theatre and window-dressing to give the public impression that the alliance is offering the former Soviet Republic something substantive. In reality, it all amounts to throwing a bare bone. This is analogous to overinflated promises made by European Union leaders like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen who repeatedly talk up the prospects of Ukraine joining the bloc in the future. The chances of that happening for a broken, rampantly corrupt, failed state like Ukraine are inconceivable. Again, empty, cynical promises.

All the NATO and EU talk is public relations bluster to conceal the brutal reality that the United States and its Western allies have created a monumental morass of misery for Ukraine by pursuing their nefarious geopolitical games to confront Russia. The rest of Europe and indeed the whole world has paid a terrible price for these imperial games.

But Washington and its NATO allies cannot admit the odious, incriminating reality, as our columnist Martin Jay points out this week. The military alliance is approaching its 75th anniversary since its foundation in 1949. There is thus huge pressure to try to make the Ukraine conflict look like some kind of victory to protect the fragile image of the obsolete alliance and the political reputation of incompetent Western leaders.

Another of our columnists this week, Declan Hayes, is well worth a read, lamenting the dearth of strategic thinking by the U.S. and its NATO vassals. Hayes amusingly describes how American military ventures under the cover of NATO multilateralism are conducted as if the protagonists are directing a cowboy matinee movie. No wonder these cowboy politicians and military leaders have lost so many wars over the decades. Even the last war they claim to have won – World War Two – was actually won by the Soviet Red Army. The Americans dropped atomic bombs on Japanese civilians to obliterate their way to a semblance of victory in the Asia-Pacific.

The calamity of Ukraine has resulted from pathetic groupthink by the Biden administration and its European lackeys. The thinking of American and European so-called leaders is shallow, narcissistic and distorted by Russophobia. None of the Western political class have the intellect or historical understanding to reverse from the morass of their making.

But this is not merely a characteristic flaw of contemporary Western regimes. The futile and reckless war in Ukraine has been decades in the making since the supposed end of the Cold War in 1990. The treacherous breaking of promises by American presidents, especially Bill Clinton and George W Bush, to Russia to not expand NATO and the insidious inveigling of Ukraine to join the alliance from 2008 onwards – all led to the current eruption of conflict.

Biden and other Western partners have simply been the last weak link in the chain of events over many years.

If only the United States had people of the calibre of Professor John Mearsheimer. He, among other genuine American political thinkers, has warned for several years that the U.S. policy of treacherous enlargement of NATO would eventually lead to conflict with Russia.

Mearsheimer in a recent article also confirms what other sources have adduced, namely that the U.S. and Britain deliberately scuttled the chance for peace with Russia in the early part of the present war. The Biden administration and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sabotaged a putative peace deal that Russia had worked out with Ukraine back in March 2022, only about four weeks into the conflict. The upshot of that sabotage by the U.S. and Britain was nearly two years of catastrophic hostilities and as many as half a million deaths.

Another respected American thinker whose ability and insights are badly missing in the Washington establishment is Jeffrey Sachs. The economist and geopolitical analyst has also repeatedly emphasized, like Mearsheimer, that the U.S. has created the predictable disaster in Ukraine. In a recent interview, Sachs remarked that history is littered with failed U.S. proxy wars, from Vietnam to Afghanistan and Iraq, and now Ukraine.

“This is standard operating procedure for the United States,” said Sachs. “The United States always overpromises and oversells,” he says, thereby inciting and prolonging wars and annihilation.

He describes the failure in Ukraine as another “absolutely stupid and avoidable war”.

The infernal trouble, however, is that millions of innocent people pay for this demonic imperial machination.

Regarding the devastation in Ukraine, Jeffrey Sachs makes the eminently logical conclusion: “The U.S. needs to start negotiating like an adult.”

One might add, like an intelligent and morally adjusted, law-abiding adult.

Sachs advocates that Washington must accept Russia’s reasonable terms for a peace settlement in Ukraine. That means no NATO enlargement. The shame is, as noted above, that this was what Russia was offering before the current war erupted, and indeed for many years before that.

Again, the perplexing dilemma is the United States imperial power is anathema to the conduct of such normal, reasonable and law-abiding relations. The U.S. national security state that evolved after the Second World War is built on a hyper-militarized corporate capitalism that does not tolerate any mutual international relations. It is based on zero-sum hegemony. Essentially, it is a rogue state that considers itself above the law. In short, that is the definition of imperialism and fascism.

Recently, the 60th anniversary of the assassination of President John F Kennedy by the U.S. national security state is a stark reminder of the deeply pernicious and dark nature of U.S. imperial power and how it will not brook any challenge or dissent. JFK was executed in broad daylight in Dallas, in 1963, by the imperial deep state in what was in effect a regime-change coup against American democracy to install politicians who would do the bidding of the ruling elite. The ruling elite did not like Kennedy’s detente plans with the Soviet Union. International peace is not profitable for, or compatible with, U.S. capitalist imperialism.

The litany of wars and destruction caused by the United States over the past eight decades is testimony to that barbarous reality. The conformity of the U.S. and Western news media in concealing, or at least playing down, this hideous reality is an object lesson in mass propaganda control. Think about it, why does it seem so controversial to call the United States the world’s biggest terrorist organization when it is so empirically the case? That speaks to the insidious power of Western media perception management.

The death this week of Henry Kissinger has prompted much eulogizing for a “great statesman and diplomat”. Kissinger was neither. He was another American war criminal – albeit a seemingly erudite one – in a crowded crypt of similar American warmongers who held high office in U.S. governments. Kissinger sabotaged a peace deal in Vietnam that could have been possible in 1969 until he relented for expedient calculations in 1973, thereby causing millions of unnecessary deaths. The same modus operandi of instigating unnecessary war and deaths prevails today in U.S. policy, as we have seen in Ukraine. The warmongers come and go, but the policy of criminal destruction remains the same because it serves the core corrupt imperial power.

Deplorably, the miserable mess that is Ukraine is not unique. Unfortunately, it is par for the U.S. imperial course. As long as the fundamental nature of American imperial power remains, the same destructive course will continue.

Mercifully, however, the war-indebted U.S. empire is faltering towards its historic and final demise. Every empire has its day in the sun.

Finally, we may note, post-Second World War U.S. imperial machinations began in Ukraine through the early CIA’s collaboration with defeated Nazism for confronting its erstwhile ally the Soviet Union. In 1945 and subsequent years, Nazi war criminals in Ukraine were recruited to serve Uncle Sam. It was typical treachery. Despite all the Hollywood glamour about defeating Nazi Germany, the U.S. redeployed the Third Reich war machine for its postwar imperial designs. Fittingly, eight decades on, the same territory now spells the end of the American empire.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2023/ ... -and-more/

*********

A BIRD NAMED JOHNSON: WHY UKRAINE DECLINED A PEACE AGREEMENT WITH RUSSIA IN SPRING 2022
DECEMBER 1, 2023

Image
Strana.ru, 11/25/23 (Translation by Prof. Geoffrey Roberts)

Yesterday’s statement by David Arakhamiya [leader of Zelensky’s Servant of the People fraction in Ukraine’s parliament] that the war could have ended in spring 2022 if Ukraine had agreed to neutral status and signed a peace treaty on this basis raises a great many questions.

Based on information from the media and other sources, it seems Russia was ready to leave, without a fight, all the territories it had captured after February 24, 2022, in exchange for Ukraine’s neutral status (i.e. its refusal to join NATO). Moreover, if German Chancellor Schröder is to be believed, Russia was ready to return the entire Donbass to Ukraine on terms of broad autonomy modelled on South Tyrol in Italy.

Ukraine would have liberated almost all of its territories (except Crimea) virtually without a fight. The many thousands of civilians and military personnel who died after April 2022 would still be alive. Ukraine, without losing a single soldier, would have regained regions the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried – with heavy losses and without much success – to liberate during this year’s counteroffensive. As for NATO, Ukraine still has no guarantee of joining the Alliance.

Why did the Ukrainian authorities refuse such a profitable agreement in spring 2022?

Arakhamiya makes two arguments: firstly, it would have been necessary to change the Constitution, and, secondly, there was no trust the Russians would fulfil the agreement.

Both arguments are, to put it mildly, problematic. Yes, it is forbidden to change the Constitution during martial law, but if desired, a way out could have been found to a technical problem by the necessary political will (and since the Ukrainian authorities were negotiating about this at all, they must have seen some options). As for trust, this is an even stranger thesis, since according to the agreement, it was not Ukraine that had to withdraw troops, but Russia. Iin exchange, moreover, only for a decision on a neutral status, which could have been revisited at any time. The issue of trust – whether to “jump or not” – was primarily Moscow’s problem, not Kiev’s.

Subsequently, the Ukrainian authorities named another reason for the refusal – the tragedy in Bucha. However, if we recall Zelensky’s statements at that time, immediately after the tragedy he said that negotiations with the Russian Federation still needed to be conducted.

“Every such tragedy, every such Bucha, will hit you on the wrist in one or another negotiation. But we must find opportunities for such steps,” Zelensky said on 5 April 2022. It was only later that his statements became more categorical.

Hence the president’s main motive for refusing to conclude an agreement with Putin in 2022, is said to be that (perhaps under the influence of the arguments and promises of Western allies) he came to the conclusion that Russia was not ready for a big war and that Ukraine with Western help could completely defeat the Russian army and dictate to Moscow its peace terms, which would include the withdrawal of Russian troops to the 1991 borders, the payment of reparations, etc.

That is, figuratively speaking, Zelensky chose a pie in the sky instead of the bird in his hand.

At the same time, for those who remember the situation at the beginning of April 2022, it is difficult to believe the Ukrainian authorities could have felt so optimistic. The Russian army, having withdrawn troops from the north of Ukraine, launched an offensive in the east – in the Kharkov, Donetsk and Lugansk regions, and the advance of Russian troops continued in the completely surrounded Mariupol. The Ukrainian army experienced a growing hunger for shells. The first deliveries of Western howitzers and shells for them began only in mid-April. And “Hymars” appeared only in June. At that time, no one spoke about the supply of Western tanks and long-range missiles. The United States even blocked the supply of Soviet-style aircraft. In Russia itself there were still no signs of internal unrest. On the contrary, it became clear that its economy had not collapsed under the sanctions, that it had withstood the main blow.

In such conditions, it seems almost incredible that Zelensky could have refuses the extremely attractive “blue tit” of Russia’s withdrawal from almost all occupied territories of Ukraine without a fight, believing in the possibility of getting the “crane” in the form of Moscow’s surrender (which, as we know, hasn’t happened yet).

There must have been some compelling circumstance for Kyiv to reject such favourable conditions for ending the war in spring 2022.

What kind of circumstance became clear from the same interview with Arakhamiya.

He reported that the then British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, came to Kyiv and said that “we won’t sign anything with them at all, let’s just fight.”

The question arises: what exactly did Johnson mean by “we won’t sign anything with them?” There can be only one answer: Western countries refused to give joint guarantees with Russia about the security of Ukraine, which must have been attached to the peace treaty and the neutral status agreement.

Actually, Arakhamiya directly said this: “We were advised by Western allies not to agree to ephemeral security guarantees, which at that time were impossible to give at all.”

Let us recall that according to the then plan, security guarantees were to be given by Russia, leading Western countries and a number of other major world powers. But if NATO countries refused to give guarantees and only the Russian Federation and, possibly, China and Turkey gave them, this would, in fact, mean a complete break in Ukraine’s relations with the Western world. Which Zelensky, naturally, could not do.

In other words, it was the position of the Western allies – “let’s just fight” – that had a decisive influence on the decision of the Ukrainian authorities to abandon any agreement with the Russian Federation in spring 2022.

In this regard, one of the key questions concerning further developments is whether the Western position has changed. Recently, one can constantly find reports in the media that the leaders of the United States and the EU are actively pushing the Ukrainian authorities to negotiate with Russia. However, there is no official confirmation of this – only information with reference to certain sources. Publicly, both the Ukrainian authorities and the authorities of Western countries emphasise that they are not prepared to compromise with the Russian Federation and continue to demand the withdrawal of troops to the 1991 borders.

How things stand in reality will largely become clear from the military and financial assistance provided by Ukraine’s allies – if it is indeed significantly limited (as a number of media outlets predict), it would signal the West’s concept has changed compared to spring 2022.

In his interview, Arakhamiya reiterated Kyiv’s position on negotiations, saying they are not profitable at the moment, since “our negotiating position is very bad.”

But on whose side is time working? If in 2022 it was possible to end the war by liberating almost the entire territory of the country without a fight in exchange for neutral status, now there are no such options. And the alternative is completely different – a long war with all its victims and risks, or peace/truce along the front line with the actual consolidation of Russian control over the occupied territories (and, it is possible, this will also be accompanied by additional demands in the form of the same neutral status, for example).

The main thing is what the conditions and negotiating positions will be in the future, and whether Ukraine’s authorities understand that these may turn out to be even worse than they are now.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2023/12/a-b ... ring-2022/

********

I went to a psychologist
December 2, 23:30

“In the 14th OMBR, a young psychologist was shot dead: the militants refused to go on the attack.
This high-profile incident occurred not far from Sinkovka, in one of the battalions of the 14th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The
battalion commander, Major Viktor Khomyak, received the help of psychologist Natalya Lichman, who received her first officer’s commission this summer rank: lieutenant.
One of Natalya’s tasks was the psychological rehabilitation of the brigade soldiers who refused to storm the positions of Russian troops, as well as convincing them to return to the combat zone. The
“psychologist” emotionally tried to convince the “defenders” to recapture their lost positions, and “ran over” the battalion commander Khomyak, calling him a coward and a refusenik.
As a result of an altercation, Major Khomyak shot Lieutenant Lichman, then her death was attributed to artillery shelling by the Russian Armed Forces with cluster munitions.
However, the psychologist’s relatives do not believe this - they demand that the prosecutor’s office conduct an investigation, as well bring the battalion commander to justice."

PS. If you shoot a psychologist, then you don’t have to go on the attack. The news serves as an advertisement for the mobilization of women in Ukraine.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8802959.html

Trophy "Bradley"
December 3, 14:37

Image

It is reported that in the Avdeevka area our military captured an American Bradley infantry fighting vehicle.
Previously, we didn’t get them as trophies.

Image

We are waiting in Alabino.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8803864.html

Marinka. December 2023
December 3, 13:30

Image

Aerial view of the ruins of Marinka.
The city (or rather, what’s left of it after 9 years of fighting) has been practically liberated by our troops; all that remains is to squeeze out a small piece on the northwestern outskirts.

Image

Image

It is unlikely that Marinka will be restored after the war.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8803713.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Mon Dec 04, 2023 1:15 pm

The Western paralysis
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ DEC 3, 2023
Written by Luis of Slayangad. Originally posted on SLG Analytica

Image

Why the West can’t build anything even when needed and what it means to Russia and the war

Many people are waiting for the moment Russia will win the war against the entire collective West by WO: when this bloc with 30+ of the richest countries in the world will give up or be unable to continually waste money and material in Ukraine. This would be the case if the financial system wasn’t a rigged game and those countries were actually forced to live within their means and bound to the resources they have, like Russia does. Instead, they can just keep printing their endless dollars and euros, dump them across the globe, and force the countries they enslave to hand in their resources.

There is though one self-imposed limitation that might bring their ability to wage war to an end, which is the same neoliberal system they implemented across the globe. While the bad aspects of their economy are simplistically dismissed as “bureaucracy”, they are structural, intentional and an unchangeable dogma, trusted at a religious level. After decades of treating industry and technical professions literally as a burden, Western countries are facing difficulty to scale up their military industry as their army of web programmers and market analysts isn’t quite useful for that.

However, as I don’t know much about weapons, I will use another subject to discuss this, one that I know very well and probably you know too, which is the growing difficulty of me and you affording a roof over their heads in the richest countries of the world. But for Russia to be able to take advantage of this weakness, it needs to not be doing exactly the same.

The entire West is in a deep housing crisis on the verge of threatening the society cohesion. The riots in Ireland, for example, while yes, being racist thuggery, are an explosion caused by discontent over the living costs that could no longer be contained. Some countries more than others, but in every single country of the Western world, even those who experienced mass depopulation such as in Eastern Europe, the new generation can’t afford to buy a house, and the days where rent consumed a fifth or less of your rent are a distant dream. Slowly, but surely, citizens of obscenely wealthy countries who show off their financial districts are getting used to third-world problems, such as spending hours of their day in traffic or public transport as they are forced to live far away. Or living in glorified slums labelled as “co-living”, or having to live with their parents well beyond their 30s (something more and more common in Southern Europe).

Perhaps the fastest way of improving quality of life for the population in general is reducing the costs of housing. Raising salaries to match them end up in a loop of inflation, subsiding other sectors don’t have the same impact as housing is by far the largest of the costs. Of course we know that the “democratic” politicians don’t give the slightest fuck about the living standards of the peasants. But the housing crisis is beginning to affect the indicators they actually care about, such as the ability of the rich to get even richer.

Inequality between regions is growing everywhere in the globe, and more and more the entire economy of the country is concentrated around cities like London, Stockholm, NY/LA etc. At the same time these cities are literally becoming unlivable creating situations that threaten their status as the center of the world, as we see with San Francisco looking like zombie dystopia. When we have an industrial boom at region that suddenly needs an influx of workers, the sacred right of parasiting those who need a roof would still need to be respected and providing what is necessary for this industry to function would come second. This is exactly what is happening, for example, in Northern Sweden where electric battery factories, taking advantage of the cheap electricity, are being installed. Large corporations, which are the only ones the government can listen, are complaining about this, but not even that will move them away from their faith.

Let’s say Western countries did manage to grow their production at Stalin’s USSR levels and spit endless weapons to Ukraine. This would create a situation an order of magnitude worse than what is happening in Northern Sweden, and the neoliberal “democracies” would be hilariously unable of building basic infrastructure for this as the priority will be accommodating the interests of countless private actors. Regardless of the ability of printing money infinitely or being able to use natural resources from someone else.

The issue is this can’t be changed. As I mentioned in the beginning, all shortcomings of this idiocy are written out as “bureaucracy” and as a solution even more oligarch appeasing policies are enacted. The inability of change can be seen as the west’s definition of a housing crisis is the exact opposite: when house prices fall and they become more affordable.

According to our press, it is actually China who is in a housing crisis. They built too many houses. And they are becoming too cheap. And instead of rescuing the “investors”, the Chinese government is coming out, saying with more polite and sophisticated wording that they should go to hell. This is a nightmare we should avoid at any costs.

There is a caricature of Hong Kong going for decades in the West, where people live in cages and shit where they sleep. While grossed exaggerated by West’s inability of saying anything good about a non-white country, this issue does exist. The queue for social housing in Hong Kong is 5,6 years, which is considered unnaceptable by the goverment. The government has targets of making 60% of all newly built housing stock publicly owned and therefore affordable. Merely acknowledging the issue and trying to act puts them a step further than Western cities. Second, this would be a wet dream in London where queues go beyond 10 years. We are not on the way to become like those unlivable overcrowded cities we used to watch with shock and mockery. We are already there or beyond.

Whenever our masters do acknowledge the plebs are kind of struggling, the type of policies they enact as typically fiddling around with rent rates, or giving tax discounts to the companies who generated this situation in first place. Completely unable of doing anything that actually involves lifting a finger or pouring some concrete. Building crucial infrastructure today as well is only done as an excuse for privatization, such as “public-private partnerships” (a.k.a legalized corruption). The vice is widespread and it will be hard to make the ruling class to see the problem even when their own survival is at stake.

It sounds like I am advocating for communism and of course, this is something that could solve it. But we don’t even need to go as far as that. Singapore, a very right-wing dictatorship, went from being slum infested to overcoming overcrowding at the most hostile conditions by simply making the housing market, well, not a market. 79% of the Singaporeans live in a house owned by the government. Apartments are leased for a lifetime, meaning you essentially have the advantages of living in your own house but speculation is curbed. Even Western countries like Sweden, Austria or the UK itself had strong social housing and rent control policies in a time where capitalism didn’t mean automatic idiocy. Back then, actually, many European countries had strong, government-controlled or watched, industrial sectors in areas that could be quickly converted to military use such as aviation, machinery and others. This is all gone or is in the hands of private companies who are effectively stronger than the state.

Neoliberalism is a virus. It has no conscience, life on its own, it will just go own destroying its host until it dies, even if it means the virus is dying with it. It will be extremely hard for well intended, competent people regardless of ideology to change this course, it is a slow motion car crash, and essentially the final frontier of how much they can wage war against the entire rest of the world.

Russia, China and many of the Western opponents are “dictatorships”. They don’t have a ritual where every four years people choose the colour of the logo of the neoliberal party who will take the blame for the policies decided by the market. Or they do, but the ritual is not up to the standards the West likes. Funnily enough though, change is more likely to come in those places, as since they are not part of the hegemonic alliance ruling the world, they are more insecure about the direction they might be taking. Most of them are still fiercely neoliberal, but those managing to lift large chunks of its population out of poverty (such as China, Vietnam, Bolivia, etc) have a level of “interference on the markets” the West deems unacceptable. When more of those “see the light”, the “rules-based world order” will be doomed.

Russia is one of the places where this internal struggle is taking place, encouraged by the stupid sanctions which are yet another proof our enemy is very prone to shooting its own foot. While still not as much as we would like to see, the rebuilding of Mariupol and some other ravaged areas is going well beyond what the West and their bullshit would be capable of doing. Some people complain online that a similar process of speculation is taking place there: Russia is undoubtedly building fast and with quality (already something the West can’t do), but many of those are market apartments for sale that locals cannot afford and we don’t see a housing policy or social housing measures emerging. Unfortunately, I can’t check this by myself and there is very little material discussing this in detail.

In another example, this time more concrete, Moscow builds new metro lines and renews homes at a galloping speed, but unfortunately the same cannot be said about other parts of the country. Russia has its issues but there are clear sign it has the ability of thinking outside the dogma. There are encouraging signs of Russia trying to escape the downward spiral where the entire country becomes one city, and the government acknowledge disparity is an issue. However, we didn’t get the results we want yet.

Russia needs to drop what didn’t work and brought desperation and suffering in the 90s, which is copying the crap Western countries do, and double down in what has worked and is working, which is prioritizing common interest and sovereignity. The same pattern can be seen in industry in general, including weaponry. There is a process, that hopefully will intensify, of curbing the greedy middlemen and those with ability of blackmailing the society, and bringing strategic sectors, when not under public ownership, subject to common interest. This will win the war for Russia and the entire “third world” that needs to defeat the West to be free.

https://slavyangrad.org/2023/12/03/the- ... paralysis/

Google Translator

China is neoliberal? No, China has a market component of it's economy, but so far seemingly firmly under the thumb of the Party. What part of the NEP doncha like?

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 3
December 3, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Avdeevsky sector, Russian troops have expanded the zone of control south of Stepovoye , and are also fighting on the outskirts of the village. In addition, the offensive continues towards Novokalinovo . On the southern flank of Avdeevka, clashes are taking place in the vicinity of Severny , but so far without significant changes.

In the Kupyansky sector, the Russian Armed Forces are pressing the defense of Ukrainian formations in Sinkovka , near Pervomaisky and Petropavlovka . The Ukrainian Armed Forces are transferring fresh forces to Dvurechnaya to slow down the advance of the Russian Armed Forces. Today, one of these columns with reinforcements was covered by Russian artillery between Dvurechnaya and Zapadny . To the south, positional battles continue on the Torsky ledge and in the Serebryansky forestry .

In the Soledar direction, Russian fighters are advancing towards Krasnoye : fighting is now taking place in the area of ​​the Vilyanovsky nursery . To the north, clashes continue in the vicinity of Bogdanovka .

The situation on the front line and combat operations

At night, according to representatives of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Russian Aerospace Forces worked at an air defense control and equipment point in the Dnepropetrovsk region , and also hit targets at the Mirgorod airfield in the Poltava region and an ammunition arsenal in the Nikolaev region.

Image
In the Kupyansky sector, the Russian Armed Forces continue to put pressure on the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Sinkovka , south of Liman Pervoy and near Pervomaisky . In turn, the enemy is transferring additional forces to the Dvurechnaya area and, according to some reports, is preparing to cross the Oskol River. The purpose of this attack may be to distract the Russian group from the ongoing offensive of the Russian Armed Forces in the area of ​​​​Sinkovka and Petropavlovka . One of these columns with reinforcements, coming from the Western direction, was covered by artillery of the Russian Armed Forces.

In the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector, the Russian Army managed to advance in plantings in the area of ​​the Torsky ledge, as well as occupy enemy strongholds near Serebryansky forestry. In turn, the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried to counterattack with the forces of the 12th Special Forces Brigade “Azov”, but were unsuccessful.

Image
On the northern flank of the Soledar direction, Russian military personnel continue to advance from Khromovo to Krasnoye (Ivanovsky). The fighters are advancing towards a local nursery near the village. In the southern sector, meanwhile, fierce fighting continues near Kleshcheevka and in the vicinity of Andreevka . In general, at the moment there are no significant changes in the configuration of the front.

Image
In the Avdeevsky sector, Russian troops expanded the zone of control in Stepovo , as well as south of the village itself. At the same time, an offensive is underway towards Novokalinovo , and fighting continues in the vicinity of AKHZ . On the southern flank, the Russian Armed Forces are pushing through the defenses of Ukrainian formations in the south of the North , but so far without any significant success.


In addition, yesterday a video of the execution of members of Ukrainian formations, filmed from a drone, appeared on the Internet. The episode occurred in the Avdeevsky sector during the fighting on the outskirts of Stepovoy . The recording shows how two people take turns leaving the dugout, but suddenly they open fire on the second one. Why this happened is anyone’s guess: the quality of the footage does not even allow us to accurately understand which particular member of the Russian Armed Forces was the first to start shooting. We will not be like the Kiev regime in our methods of covering such events and will simply note that in war, unfortunately, they happen, and only a small part gets into the frame. And the reasons are very different, especially in the heat of battle , where the speed of decision-making is a matter of life and death.


In addition, Russian fighters seem to have managed to bring to the rear an American M2A2 ODS Bradley infantry fighting vehicle , which had previously been shot down in the Avdeevsky sector. In fact, this is the first objectively confirmed captured infantry fighting vehicle of this type. Although the Russian Armed Forces repeatedly hit these vehicles and filmed them closely, they were not captured: the equipment was stationed in no man’s land, which made evacuation extremely difficult. Therefore, military personnel were limited to exporting individual components, such as optics and other elements, for study. The current captured Bradley belonged to the same 47th Infantry Brigade : since the beginning of summer, it has already lost 42 armored vehicles of this type in battles, first in the Zaporozhye direction, and later near Avdeevka .

Meanwhile, in the Horlivka sector, Ukrainian formations continue to attack near Mayorskoye , but so far without any success.

In Marinka, the Ukrainian Armed Forces counterattacked in the north-west of the city, somewhat pushing back the Russian military personnel. Currently, fighting in this area continues.


In the Orekhovsky sector, Ukrainian formations continue to attack in the direction of Novoprokopovka and near Verbov. In the latter case, the Ukrainian formations again lost a significant amount of manpower in the wounded and killed, as well as an armored personnel carrier that was blown up by a mine. Russian artillerymen are actively working on the enemy, preventing attempts to carry out rotation.


There are no changes in the Kherson direction : enemy marines still hold the bridgehead in Krynki . Russian military personnel do not allow the Ukrainian Armed Forces to expand the zone of control around the village, but they still cannot dislodge them. Currently, the weather in this area has deteriorated significantly, affecting the intensity of hostilities, but this is a temporary phenomenon. As before, the big problem of the Russian Armed Forces near Krynki remains the large number of FPV drones the enemy has and the small number of means to combat them.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas
In the Kursk region, Ukrainian formations again shelled the village of Tetkino . Details of the incident are unknown, but no one was injured.

Image
This afternoon, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fiercely shelled populated areas of the Donetsk People's Republic . Arrivals were recorded in Makeyevka and the Yasinovatsky district, although after the start of the assault on the Avdeevsky fortified area, the intensity of shelling of these settlements decreased significantly. In Donetsk, five districts of the city were under enemy fire at once (Kievsky, Kirovsky, Kuibyshevsky, Leninsky and Petrovsky districts). The result of these attacks was the injury of seven civilians in the capital of the DPR. In addition, the city of Gorlovka is under intense fire . Here during the day the local air defense system was activated several times. Despite this, local authorities reported two civilians were injured.

Image
Ukrainian formations continue to massively shell settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region . Last night , Novaya Kakhovka, Kakhovka, Cossack Camps, Golaya Pristan, Novaya Mayachka and Radensk came under fire . At the moment, there has been no information about damage or casualties. In addition, the enemy still maintains control over the bridgehead in the village of Krynki , however, due to fog and rain, the intensity of fighting in the area of ​​​​the village has decreased.

Political events
Rumors about Cuban mercenaries in the ranks of the Russian Armed Forces

Ukrainian media have been promoting news about the recruitment of foreigners into the ranks of the Russian Armed Forces for several days now. The group of Cubans that attracted the most attention was called up by the Tula military registration and enlistment office and appeared in several joint videos with Russian military personnel. Considering that this is one of the rare cases of mass sending of foreigners to the front, we can only rejoice that the leadership of the RF Armed Forces has finally taken a favorable position on recruiting non-Russians for military service under contract.

Previously, initiatives to centrally send groups of foreigners to the Northern Military District zone were boycotted and rejected, which, however, does not negate the presence of individual foreign citizens on the front line as part of volunteer battalions. But they got there, as a rule, with great difficulty and through personal connections. Well, in this context, it is appropriate to remember that besides Cuba , there are other countries where there are still a large number of people willing to participate in the Northern Military District on the side of the Russian Armed Forces. First of all, we are , of course, talking about the countries of the Middle East and Africa , which we have mentioned more than once .

Nuances around American assistance to Ukraine

Interesting details have become known about what concessions in the field of migration policy the Democrats are going to make in order to push the bill on aid to Ukraine through Congress . Republicans are demanding stricter policies on granting asylum to migrants, as well as limiting the president's powers to parole them. Their political opponents, apparently, are ready to agree to this. There has already been an uproar in the Democratic Party about this, with some members of the faction arguing that such concessions would “punch a hole in Biden’s border strategy . ” At least 10 Democrats said they would not vote for such amendments. Member of the House of Representatives Raul Grijalva even said that the Senate is trying to “ sell” them: “It will be terrible. I think the Senate will actually sell us out. This is not just a problem for asylum seekers and refugees trying to get into this country.”

And again about German aid to Ukraine

European squabbles regarding military supplies to Ukraine are actively discussed on the Internet . EU countries are arguing about who should help the Ukrainian Armed Forces more and are trying to shift responsibility onto each other. First , it turned out that the head of the German Ministry of Defense, Boris Pistorius , allegedly did not warn the Bundestag that he would promise a new package of military assistance to Ukraine worth 1.3 billion euros. Then the media began to write that Germany was trying to reduce the amount it allocated to the EU fund for Ukraine.

Moreover, a day after the attack against Pistorius, the German government announced a new aid package for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And this is not surprising. On the one hand, NATO countries are indeed faced with an unprecedented consumption of ammunition at the front and the unpreparedness of their production base to satisfy enormous demands. On the other hand, German defense corporations have already launched a process of reorientation towards the conveyor production of ammunition and armored vehicles to the detriment of high-tech industries, which we have been writing about for several months. The same Rheinmetall , which is Ukraine’s largest defense-industrial partner, last year received orders worth about 900 million euros, and in 2023 the amount increased to 2.5 billion euros.

Thus, such information noise in the media should not be perceived as anything other than populism and an attempt to appease that part of the German audience that is dissatisfied with the ongoing support for Ukraine. Attacks against the German Ministry of Defense should show the appearance that German politicians are allegedly conducting a discussion and defending the interests of voters. In fact, Germany will remain one of the main suppliers of equipment and assistance for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the share of which will vary depending on the position of primarily the United States, but not the German population. Accordingly, supplies from Europe will continue, at a minimum, to keep Ukraine’s military machine afloat.

About the main beneficiaries of the Ukrainian conflict

Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin , speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum , said that the United States will not allow Russia to win in Ukraine. At the same time, he emphasized that during the Ukrainian conflict, the United States increased funding for the production of ammunition by 50% , and the production of shells itself increased almost fourfold .

Statements similar in content were made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg . He noted that the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not live up to the expectations set by Western partners, and also called for an increase in Western supplies of weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to avoid a critical situation.

Such rhetoric from American officials is not surprising, especially considering the fact that during the conflict the United States earned more than $ 50 billion from the gas problems of its European allies, and the US military-industrial complex is experiencing a renaissance that has not been seen since the end of the Cold War. At the same time, the Pentagon procurement department is calling for additional investment in American industry.

On the expansion of the anti-presidential coalition in Ukraine

The British magazine The Economist has once again published material demonstrating the internal political split of the Ukrainian elites. The mayor of Kiev Vitaliy Klitschko , immediately after the scandalous statement about authoritarian tendencies in Ukraine, spoke out in support of the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny . According to the politician, people want to hear the truth about the real situation at the front, whatever it may be, in particular about the failure of the summer offensive. The statements of the Kyiv mayor about Zelensky’s person sound much more interesting. Although Klitschko called on Ukrainian society to rally around the president during the period of martial law, he also stated the mistakes for which Zelensky will have to answer after the conflict:
“ And yet: today the president has an important function and we must support him until the end of the war. But at the end of the war, every politician will answer for his successes and failures."

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

*******

How Kiev Wanted to Expand the War to Belarus

Pepe Escobar

December 3, 2023

There are no guarantees that plans to set fire to Belarus have been permanently shelved, Pepe Escobar writes.



Well, Kiev – literally – never sleeps.

This document – attached, and verified at the highest level, is a report on several recon operations on the Ukraine-Belarus border conducted four months ago.



Several Ukrainian Special Ops groups had been engaged in deep recon previous to a possible Hail Mary-style plan: launching an offensive against the territory of Belarus, thus expanding the U.S. proxy war on Russia “multilaterally”.

It’s not clear if this was a Kiev idea; a plan dictated by the NATO masters; or a mix of the two. Minsk, of course, was not exactly observing from a distance.

Now let’s get to the meat of the matter.

The document specifies “aerial reconnaissance 130 Rbpak crew MATRICE-30”, in an intel report dated July 21, 2023.

“An aerial survey of the Republic of Belarus was conducted: two Matrice – 30 ascents were made.

The flight altitude is 950 m. Electronic warfare system was not detected, communication with remote control was not lost, GPS signals were in Normal mode.

Without crossing the DKU.

During flights in the direction of KALININO-SK-42. x: 5727537; Y: 5583485 a video surveillance vehicle “Grenadier” was discovered – SK-42. x:5727404;

Y:5583417. Designed for station monitoring of approaches to the border.

Traces and signs of the passage of enemy DRGS, and the movement of enemy equipment in these directions are not detected.

No changes were detected along the DKU.

During the conducted aerial reconnaissance, no active actions related to the enemy’s offensive were detected.

The area is wooded and impassable for enemy personnel and equipment.

This section of the DKU is not in demand of additional aerial survey.”

Watch those impassable swamps

Now we switch to an intel report by the group “IRLANDETS” (“Irishman”), also dated July 21, 2023.

“Reconnaissance was carried out by means of reconnaissance and military search in the direction of the ZABOLOTYE in the area of the border strip and adjacent areas.

Copter take-off Point X:5719499; Y:5520355.

Start of the route: X: 5719667; Y:5518682.

End of Route: X: 5719641; Y:5522372.

The area along the recreation center and roads leading to the recreation center were surveyed.

No traces or signs of the passage of enemy sabotage and reconnaissance group and enemy equipment were found.

The terrain in the area of reconnaissance is impassable for enemy equipment, which is due to a natural barrier in the form of impassable swamps, dense forest stands, and a river flows along the border line in this square. However, this section is possible for the passage of personnel.

Enemy’s composition, especially sabotage and reconnaissance group.

Confirmed presence of minefields.

Accumulation of military equipment, enemy personnel near the recreation center was not observed.

Aerial intelligence conducted.

We proceed to perform tasks for their intended purpose in another area, according to the intelligence agency’s action plan groups.”

Let’s collect some berries

Now for the RG (intel group) reconnaissance report “Partizan”, also dated July 21, 2023.

“Exploration was carried out by searching and observing, interviewing the local population in the direction of the PEREBRODY district (X:5733040; Y:5499111) – ZHADEN (X:5732068; Y: 5488281) – BUDIMLYA (X:5726038; Y:5498176) in the area of the border strip and adjacent areas.

Areas along the recreation center were examined, engineering and sapper barriers, forest and field roads leading to the recreation center were checked: presence of anti-tank ditches, rubble and obstacles from trees, minefields.

No traces or signs of the passage of enemy sabotage and reconnaissance group and enemy equipment were found. The area of exploration is conditionally passable for vehicles and personnel, which is due to a natural barrier, namely: reservoirs, swampy areas, engineering barriers.

Confirmed presence of minefields(SK – 42: 1)X:5734692; Y;5495350; 2) X:5734724;

Y:5495106; 3)X:5734899; Y:5494965; 4)X:5735543; Y:5497866; 5) X:5737721; Y:5501118).

When conducting reconnaissance, optical means were used: binoculars.

The situation along the DKU lines is calm. No sounds of movement or movement of enemy equipment were recorded.

Due to the berry season, the local population massively collects berries in border forests, moving to the sites by quad bikes, road transport and scooters. So, during the period of conducting reconnaissance, these vehicles and collectors were recorded up to and including the borderline.

We proceed to perform tasks according to the Action Plan of the Partizan intel group.”

There you go. This was the situation four months ago. Much has happened since: the massive drying up of funds and weapons to Kiev; the war limelight stolen by Israel; and the Zelensky-Zaluzhny dogfight. Still, there are no guarantees that plans to set fire to Belarus have been permanently shelved.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2023/ ... o-belarus/

******

Seymour Hersh, Anatol Lieven and the desperate DC gambit to end hostilities in Ukraine while claiming ‘victory’

Several days ago, the renowned, Pulitzer prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published on his substack.com account an article entitled “General to General. A potential peace is being negotiated in Ukraine by military leaders.”

To be specific, Hersh said that secret talks about a possible peace are presently being conducted by Ukraine’s military commander-in-chief General Valery Zaluzhny and Russia’s highest military officer Valery Gerasimov.

The main attention grabbing paragraph in the article was the following:

“The driving force of those talks has not been Washington or Moscow, or Biden or Putin, but instead the two high-ranking generals who run the war, Valery Gerasimov of Russia and Valery Zaluzhny of Ukraine.”

The next most sensational point in the article was that part of the settlement foresees Russian acceptance of Ukraine joining NATO on condition that NATO formally commits ‘not to place NATO troops on Ukrainian soil’ or to put offensive weapons in Ukraine.

And the final key element in the settlement that would reward Russia for its acquiescence on NATO membership would be Ukraine’s recognition of Crimea as irrevocably Russian and the holding of a referendum in the Donbas and Novorossiya (Zaporozhie and Kherson) oblasts that were liberated by Russia and then joined the Russian Federation, a measure which in effect would be a fig-leaf for formal settlement of the fate of these territories as Russian once and for all.

This article has been widely commented upon in anti-establishment media outlets, which for the most part find Hersh’s revelations to be so incredible as to be unworthy of serious discussion. In a review article carried by the unofficial Chinese journal Asia Times, Stephen Bryen suggests that ‘Hersh has been sold a bill of goods, or duped…’ See “Is Hersh story on secret Ukraine peace talks true?”

In what follows, I will consider

why Seymour Hersh was the chosen vehicle of American intelligence operatives for bringing this remarkable story to the broad American and Western publics.
how elements in the story have been appearing in the writings of other more consciously (com)pliant journalists in recent weeks as a face saving ‘exit ramp’ from the failed Ukrainian adventure is being prepared by the White House
what from among the incredible elements exposed by Hersh may actually have some factual basis and give us a foretaste of the end-game in Ukraine as it is currently envisioned in Washington, and maybe even in Moscow
*****

After passing through a number of years in relative obscurity, after being blacklisted by all U.S. mainstream media outlets, Seymour Hersh emerged center-stage this past February when he published on his substack account a lengthy article which set out in great detail how the bombing of the Nordstream I pipeline was planned and carried out under instructions from the White House and Biden’s close advisers. Though Washington formally denied any involvement in what was arguably the biggest act of state terrorism in history, and though Germany and other interested states in Europe have since done their utmost to divert attention to a cock-and-bull story of Ukrainian responsibility for the bombing of Nord Stream I, Hersh’s account was an expose worthy of the journalistic exploits that once won him the Pulitzer and it remains highly persuasive.

Of course, at age 86 Hersh did not go out and track down the story he published in February. It was brought to him on a silver platter from unidentified sources, i.e. actors within the Administration whose motives remain unclear.

The unidentified sources who have now brought the story of secret negotiations between Russian and Ukrainian generals to end the war could count on Hersh’s profound ignorance of Russia and his desire to again win plaudits for a ‘scoop.’ Here the motives of the ‘leakers’ are not hard to find: Hersh was indeed being duped in an operation to condition Western publics for an end to the Ukraine war under conditions that present defeat as victory.

Let me be perfectly clear: the notion that Russia’s General Gerasimov could on his own volition enter into talks with his Ukrainian opposite number to end the hostilities is a notion that can be entertained only by someone who fails to comprehend what the ‘vertical of power’ in Russia is all about.

At the same time, presumably to illustrate the high standing of Gerasimov, Hersh has placed at the very start of his article a photo of Putin and Gerasimov seated face to face under which we read the following caption:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting with General Valery Gerasimov at the headquarters of the Russian armed forces in Rostov-on-Don in October”

This photo is more interesting than Hersh and most readers of his article could imagine. Indeed, this very meeting in October was given video coverage on prime time Russian television on the day it occurred. We saw how Putin arrived by car well after dark following a flight to the Rostov headquarters by helicopter, how he shook hands with Gerasimov and with Defense Minister Shoigu who was also present; then we were shown how Putin departed. There was not a word about the content of these top level talks. Only a couple of days later in a dedicated television news segment did we learn that Russia had just carried out a full scale test of the battle readiness of all three arms of its strategic nuclear triad, which may be described as a direct message to Washington to proceed with great care in the Ukraine war and to think twice before authorizing any further escalation of its deliveries to Kiev of advanced offensive weapons.

A similar news report on Russian state television less than two weeks ago showed Putin, Gerasimov and Shoigu holding talks in secret at the Rostov-on-Don military headquarters. However, in the time since then no extraordinary event in the war or in overall military activities that could be matched with the talks in Rostov. I believe that Putin’s preparing Gerasimov for a meeting with Zaluzhny would fit that description.

At the same time, it is fantasy to think that Ukraine’s general Zaluzhny would risk accusations of treason if he were on his own, acting out of ambition or out of motives to save what is left of the Ukrainian armed forces, to defy President Zelensky and the standing decree prohibiting talks with the Russians so long as Putin remains in power. To suggest that he was doing so because he received backing from Washington as the Americans seek to bypass the obstinate or delusional Zelensky and find an escape path from the Ukrainian disaster is also to misunderstand how things work even in Ukraine, however dysfunctional the ruling elites may appear to be. Let us instead, turn things around: Zaluzhny would assume the role of savior of the nation only at the urging and with ironclad guarantees of protection coming from the Biden administration.

*****

The elements of a possible peace set out in the Hersh article have been circulating for weeks now in the publications and television appearances of mainstream U.S. journalists and academics. There are numerous variations in the combinations of compromises that both Ukrainian and Russian sides
are called upon to make according to which academic or pundit is penning any given article.

Let us pause for a moment to look at what one widely read academic / journalist is saying. I have in mind Anatol Lieven and his latest article published on responsiblestatecraft.org: “Biden’s role in Ukraine peace is clear now.”

In popular estimation, Lieven is a middle of the road expert with great depth of experience reporting on Russia. In my estimation, he is a chameleon who speaks out of both sides of his mouth to win over the maximum number of fans. Lieven wallows in the celebrity he enjoys while saying what the bosses in the Administration want him to say.

Going back more than a year, Lieven was especially sympathetic to the Ukrainian side in the war, never more so than when he returned from a visit to Ukraine during which he landed in a hospital and soaked up the anti-Russian vitriol of his fellow patients. He was a longtime defender of Ukrainian resilience and moral strength in standing up to the Russian bully. He was a seeming believer in ultimate Ukrainian victory. Now he has shifted to a position acknowledging the failure of the Ukrainian counter-offensive and the hopelessness of the Ukrainian military prospects.

His message today has changed 180 degrees and yet he seeks to find a way to present defeat as victory, in keeping with the boys in the White House staff. I quote at length:

A ceasefire and negotiations for a peace settlement are therefore becoming more and more necessary for Ukraine. Indeed, if the fighting stopped along the existing battle lines, more than 80 percent of Ukraine would be fully independent of (and bitterly hostile to) Russia and free to do its best to move towards membership of the European Union.

Given the Kremlin’s original aims when it launched the invasion last year, and of the history of Russia’s domination of Ukraine over the past 300 years, this would be not a Ukrainian defeat, but, on the contrary, a tremendous Ukrainian victory. If, on the other hand, the war continues indefinitely, there is a real possibility that Ukrainian resistance may collapse, whether through the exhaustion of its manpower or because Russia’s additional forces allow it to reopen the fronts in northern Ukraine that it pulled back from last year and that Ukraine lacks the troops to defend.

Following from this, Lieven argues for a settlement now, well in advance of the U.S. elections, when a Ukrainian collapse would be very damaging for any Democratic candidate.

He says that to bring the Russians around, Washington will have to make major concessions to the fundamental Russian demands from before the start of the war:

[Russia] will need to be assured that Washington is prepared to discuss seriously a final settlement involving neutrality for Ukraine (of course, including international security guarantees), mutual force limitations in Europe, the lifting of sanctions, and some form of inclusive European security architecture to reduce the danger of more wars in the future.

Lieven hopes that the Global South and China, in particular, can be induced “to issue a strong collective call for a ceasefire and peace talks.”

The elements in the concessions to Russia that Lieven proposes are somewhat vague. They are considerably more generous than what Seymour Hersh is proposing. No matter. Both gentlemen and dozens of their peers are being encouraged by the policy formulators in the Administration to prepare the Russians to enter into talks and to prepare the American and European publics for an end to the war that is a defeat dressed up as a victory.

*****

As I intimated above, it is entirely possible that there have been direct talks about ending the war between Gerasimov and Zaluzhny in the past couple of weeks, though neither would be an independent actor as Hersh mistakenly believes.

I will go one step further and say that it is entirely possible that the Russian side suggested that it could accept Ukraine’s entry into NATO if there was a public commitment never to post NATO forces on Ukrainian territory and not to deliver offensive weapons to Ukraine. Such things can be monitored and if there are violations they can lead directly to revocation of the agreement before any harm is done to Russian security interests.

The possible advantage to the Russian side would be to offer the Americans a face-saving exit ramp, thereby ending any possibility of dangerous escalation of American – NATO involvement on the ground should the Ukrainian forces collapse.

Vladimir Putin has been very cautious in conducting this war precisely because the Russians have a decidedly low opinion of the professionalism, and at times even of the sanity of their American counterparts. Putin is strong enough in his entourage of elites and in the broad Russian public to make a persuasive case for any settlement that ensures Russian security interests are served and that the sacrifices in men and fortune that this war has cost will be justified by the outcome.

Even in the less attractive peace terms set out by Hersh, the positive results for Russia would be the definitive liberation of most of the Russian speaking territories of Ukraine from rule by Kiev and their incorporation into the Russian Federation, the de facto demilitarization of Ukraine given its losses on the order of one million men dead or incapacitated, and the confidence that Ukraine can no longer be used as an advance attack platform of NATO against his country.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2023

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2023/12/03/ ... g-victory/

1. Ya cannot trust the US to live by it's word.
2. It would be criminal to leave Odessa under Ukrainian control.

*******

EU and US Ukraine Funding Even More in Doubt as War Effort Falters
Posted on December 4, 2023 by Yves Smith

[If you see this note, it means the post launched before complete because reasons. Please check back at 7:45 AM EST]

As Ukraine’s military condition looks worse and worse with each passing day, its continued support looks in an even more desperate condition. It is now becoming an open question, analogous to dealing with a severely ill with multiple organ systems functioning poorly, which will put them in a terminal decline. Most commentators focus on the kinetic war because it’s more visible and dynamic, and historically, countries at war usually are vanquished or surrender (or if you are at the US, slink off and try to pretend that you really didn’t care much about the outcome). But the Ukraine leadership is already engaged in infighting, and outsiders look to fanning the fires.1

In other words, it could be that, out of pattern for most conflicts, that Ukraine being so much a proxy fighter for the West, and in particular having its government and economy propped up by external funding to such a large degree that the sudden withdrawal of those monies could be destabilizing politically and operationally in ways outsiders can’t anticipate, since this aspect of the conduct of the conflict has been not very visible. This graphic gives a sense of “financial” aid as opposed to military support. From Visual Capitalist:

Image

Note that the detail under the chart depicts both the EU and US assistance as “loans and grants,” signaling that loans are more important. Recall that the military aid was substantially in kind (although it would be treated as a budgetary item, if nothing else to give an excuse for “replacement” procurement with newer kit. For instance, early in the conflict, former Warsaw Pact countries emptied their larders of aged Soviet hardware, since that was what Ukraine forces knew how to operate. Remember that there were complaints of the US sending Javelins that many were so old that their batteries did not work. Then the US went scouring the world for shells (remember South Korea contributing) and Patriot missiles (we leaned on Saudi Arabia among others). In addition, when the US managed suddenly found more money for hardware after what was depicted as an accounting check, it’s not hard to imagine that the Department of Defense simply revised the value of its past contributions lower, magically creating the appearance of additional money.

Interestingly, of the major international/Anglosphere media organs, the Financial Times makes the sudden, sharp and presumably unavoidable cut to Ukraine support from Europe an above-the-fold report (the pink paper makes it the lead story).

The short version is that last week, the German Constitutional court ruled against a financing gimmick, that of allowing the government to use spending authorized under emergency allocations (which allow Germany to relax its otherwise hair shirt deficit rules) in years after the emergency is over. German leadership wanted to engage in two no-nos in the eyes of the court: using funds earmarked for Covid in past years in budget years after the authorization and for purposes other than Covid. And that’s before getting to the fact that the budget has to have unanimous approval, and the Netherlands (and Hungary and Slovakia) are not on board, at least at the intended lavish level. From EU budget dispute threatens €50bn war lifeline for Ukraine in the Financial Times:

Disputes within the EU over money and Ukraine’s future are endangering crucial pledges to Kyiv made months ago….

EU member states are far from reaching a deal over topping up the bloc’s joint budget — including €50bn for Ukraine — ahead of a summit in Brussels on December 14-15…

EU efforts to reach a compromise are being hampered by the victory of a far-right party in last month’s Dutch election and a recent German court ruling curbing the government’s borrowing. A budget agreement would be “very, very difficult”, a senior official said….

A failure to approve long-term funding, a separate €20bn facility for weapons purchases and the start of accession negotiations would be a hammer blow to Kyiv after the failure of its summer counteroffensive and growing concern about faltering western support. Olha Stefanishyna, Ukraine’s deputy prime minister, last week described the EU summit as an “existential moment” for her country….

Germany and other states have vowed to give Brussels no additional funds beyond that required for Kyiv, while others are demanding extra cash for domestically sensitive issues such as migration….

“I think the doom and gloom around this issue is vastly over-exaggerated,” said one EU official involved in the discussions. “We are not going to allow Ukraine to experience a sovereign default.”


It does not appear to occur to EU officials that Ukraine does not have to default. As a sovereign currency issuer, it can always create more hyrinas to pay its debts. But Ukraine is already at an estimated 30% inflation level. More net spending to meet obligations and continue funding government operations would turbo-charge price increases. Regardless, the specter of default will focus some minds.

As the story explains, the impact on the German budget is substantial, as are the knock-on effects to the EU, since Germany provides about 25% of EU spending. The current EU budget authorization has gone pear-shaped and Ukraine funds are sure to take a big

Recall as we have stressed that the parade of official visitors and tony journalists have almost entirely gone to Kiev, where only a comparatively few areas need to be kept in good shape (near official buildings, the embassy area, and the top tourist hotels and restaurants) to create Potemkin normalcy. And a few of these outsiders have gone to the front lines….which has been at points revealing, but not of general conditions in society and the economy. Given the big fall in GDP, the yawning budget deficit, the departure of millions and low odds that many will return (and those who left likely skew to prime age adults and the educated), the loss of the resources and output of the productive eastern oblast, domestic conditions are sure to be pretty poor. And that’s before unpleasant facts like the money to repair the Ukraine electrical grid after the Russian attacks of last winter was largely looted. So Russia may not have to do much more in the way of strikes to have it fall over under increased winter load. That could happen in large measure all on its own.2

Experts have pointed out that Russia has succeeded in greatly depleting Western weapons supplies even as the largely de-industrialized US/NATO combine has banged on about the paramount importance of not letting the evil Putin prevail in Ukraine. Yet the rhetoric of urgency has not even been remotely met with commensurate action, namely a World War II or even Sputnik-level rearmament program.

_____

1 Alexander Mercoursis and Gilbert Doctorow, among others, recently debunked Seymour Hersh’s latest story, which claimed that Russia’s General Gerasimov, the Chief of Staff, was negotiating with Ukraine General Zaluzhny (Doctorow is more willing to consider that there might be some elements of truth here; Mercouris’ good contacts supports his take that this story was quite the howler). The reasons for running this account through Hersh, who is dependent on US spooky contacts and not at all well informed about how Russia works, might be to flog the idea that Ukraine (and the US) were willing to offer reasonable terms that the Russians rejected. But anyone who has been following the war would recall that Putin clearly warned early last year that the longer the war went on, the harder it would become to negotiate with Russia. A second motive might be to heighten the simmering conflict between Zelensky and Zaluzhny, with the hope that Zelensky forcing Zaluzhny out would trigger military or other opposition and precipitate his removal or flight, an outcome the US would likely welcome (Zelensky has not been taking US direction for how to conduct the war for some time).

2 Expect new Russian attacks to be depicted as the cause if there are electricity crises, even if new strikes are limited. Note I am not saying Russia might not target the grid in a big way again, but that will be depicted as the cause of any crisis, as opposed to Ukraine stealing rescue funds rather than making repairs.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/12 ... lters.html

******

Kiev’s Mayor, The NATO Chief, & The US’ Top General All Debunked Zelensky’s Delusions

ANDREW KORYBKO
DEC 4, 2023

Image

Klitschko used his credibility with Westerners to confirm that Zelensky has indeed turned into a dictator, Stoltenberg is preparing them for bad news from the front, while Brown is telling them to expect a political compromise with Russia.

Zelensky was accused by an unnamed close aide in late October of having messianic delusions of victory over Russia according to Time Magazine’s damning cover story about him, and while he’s since sobered up a bit after Politico just mocked him, the Ukrainian leader still doesn’t realize that his side lost. Kiev Mayor Vitaly Klitschko, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg, and the US’ top general Charles Brown Jr. all debunked his remaining delusions in each of their statements over the past few days.

Beginning with the first, this famous boxing champion told Der Spiegel that “Ukraine is on the path to authoritarianism” and that the local authorities are now “under enormous pressure” from the center. This makes Klitschko the latest of Zelensky’s rivals after former advisor Alexey Arestovich and Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny. His importance amidst Ukraine’s growing political divisions is that he could one day leverage his enormous respect among the capital’s residents to lead future protests.

As for the second, he told Germany’s Das Erste TV that “wars are difficult to plan” so “we have to be prepared for bad news” from Ukraine. This follows his admission last week that “even with this substantial significant military support from NATO Allies, [Ukraine has] not, over the last year, been able to move the front line. And that just reflects the fact that we should never underestimate Russia.” He’s basically preconditioning the public for the possibility of a Russian counteroffensive sometime soon.

Rounding everything out with the new Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, this leading military official told the Reagan National Defense Forum in response to a question about the Ukrainian endgame that “any military conflict, you don't solve it completely by military means. It ends up with a diplomatic solution.” He then added that America’s armed aid to that country is aimed at “shaping” the outcome. Simply put, he tacitly admitted that Zelensky’s envisaged maximalist victory over Russia isn’t realistic.

Putting these three statements together, they collectively contributed to debunking the Ukrainian leader’s remaining delusions by informing the public of how ridiculous each aspect thereof is. Klitschko used his credibility with Westerners to confirm that Zelensky has indeed turned into a dictator, Stoltenberg is preparing them for bad news from the front, while Brown is telling them to expect a political compromise with Russia. All told, there’s no doubt that the Ukrainian Conflict is winding down.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/kievs-ma ... ef-and-the
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:02 pm

A new phase of the war
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/05/2023

Image

Aware that, in the absence of good news, only his presence on the front can achieve headlines reminding that the war in Ukraine is still active, Zelensky headed to the contact line last week. He did so accompanied by journalists from the American agency AP, which guaranteed, at least, an interview and an in-depth report that would later be picked up by other media in the United States, a country to which he constantly appeals in search of attention and financing. . The place chosen for the visit has not been, as on previous occasions, the hottest area of ​​the eastern front. On this occasion, the Ukrainian president visited the Kupyansk area, where small Russian advances are less dangerous due to the presence of the Oskol reserve.

It is in the Donetsk area, which Zelensky visited in his previous media-military appearance, where the situation has become complicated for Ukraine. Despite the official discourse, which states that Russia is losing thousands of men and hundreds of tanks in its attempt to advance on Avdeevka or Marinka, in recent hours progress has been seen in both towns, local battles that are part of the step assault tactic. step by step, locality by locality, that Russian troops have used in Donbass. The Russian objective is to gradually move Ukrainian artillery away from the city of Donetsk, which requires breaking its first line of defense. Built over the years of war in Donbass and further fortified since 2022, that barrier can be considered the Ukrainian equivalent of the Surovikin Line , the defense that prevents Ukrainian troops from storming through the Zaporozhye fields.

In the interview given to AP , in which Zelensky admits that the results of the counteroffensive are not as desired - something that, without the slightest self-criticism, he attributes to the slowness with which his allies have sent the necessary weapons -, the president Ukrainian also refers to a new phase of the war. Volodymyr Zelensky speaks of the arrival of winter as the cause of this change and warns, as he did a year ago, that the country is facing its toughest moment. The comment fundamentally refers to the possibility that Russia seeks to repeat its strategy from a year ago, when it attacked energy infrastructure with missiles to limit the fighting capacity of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. For the moment, it has been Ukraine that has begun to act in that direction in those places where it has the capacity to do so. Last week, before a powerful storm that caused damage in both Russia and Ukraine (including deaths) worsened the situation, Ukrainian artillery shelling had already left large areas of Gorlovka and the city without electricity. urban agglomeration of Donetsk, one of the places hardest hit by the indiscriminate and daily attacks of Zelensky's troops.

The failure to advance on the central Zaporozhye front has forced Ukraine to look for secondary objectives in which to obtain tactical results that can be presented as strategic. That was the goal when Ukraine set its sights on Artyomovsk as a favorable location in which to achieve a local victory. Aware of the difficulty of the task, Ukraine did not send there its best troops, necessary in the failed attempt to break the front towards Tokmak-Melitopol, but rather the perfectly sacrificial units such as the 3rd Brigade commanded by Andriy Biletsky. Despite weeks of announced Ukrainian advances, the front did not change excessively and there, too, Russian troops are now recovering lost territory. Denis Pushilin's statements about the serious situation on the flanks of Artyomovsk have gone far.

With the local offensive failing to achieve a minor success that could be presented as capital, Ukraine looked to another area of ​​Donbass in which Russian troops had not managed to move the front away from its main cities. As the report on Zelensky's entourage published by Time magazine , citing an officer of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, revealed in early October, “Kiev's political leadership demanded an operation to recapture the city of Gorlovka, a strategic outpost. in eastern Ukraine that the Russians have controlled and fiercely defended for almost a decade.”

Located in the northernmost part of the separation line inherited from the times of Minsk, Gorlovka has been, since the war began, one of the main focuses of Ukrainian artillery. It was there, in a central park one weekend, that Ukraine committed one of its first massacres of civilians. The DPR - and not Russia as Ukraine claims - barely defended the city, which for a time was practically surrounded by Ukrainian positions. That pressure eased slightly with the capture of Debaltsevo, which, at the very least, allowed secure rail communications with Donetsk and Lugansk. Capturing, or even isolating, Gorlovka would pose a logistical problem for the Russian command, and recapturing the city would have marked Ukraine's greatest success in Donbass since the capture of Mariupol in June 2014.

In recent weeks, the Russian press has reported on the accumulation of troops and weapons of the Armed Forces in the surroundings of Gorlovka, where Ukraine has come to boast of (dubious) progress in the gray zone . However, as expected, there has been no attempted assault there. Picking up the response to the demand to capture the city, Time quotes one of the officers asking “with what? "They have neither the men nor the weapons." The forces needed to capture farms on the outskirts differ markedly from those that would be required for an operation to take a city whose population exceeds 200,000, triple the population of Artyomovsk.

Zelensky's words when describing the new phase of the war suggest that all mobilization and transfer of reserves on the Donbass front is due, not to an attempt to break the Russian front, but to maintain their own. As the major Western media published last weekend, the Ukrainian president has given the order to build fortifications “on all the main fronts, where we have to entrench ourselves, accelerate the pace of construction.” Zelensky referred fundamentally, not to the Zaporozhye front, where the war has already entered the trench phase, but, as The Wall Street Journal reflected , “in the east and northeast, where Russia has been seeking to advance for months, achieving small gains. at a harsh cost.” In that division, the northeast corresponds to the area north of Krasny Liman and towards the Kharkiv region, while the east refers entirely to the Donbass front from that town to the south of Donetsk. Curiously, as the slowness of Russian advances shows, that is the most fortified part of the 2014 front. Even so, it is there that the Ukrainian president insists on the need to build - or perhaps reinforce - the fortifications.

So far, this defense work carried out by Ukraine throughout the eight years of war in Donbass has slowed down the Russian advance in certain areas, while preventing it in others. This is the case of Gorlovka, where advances are limited to the northern part, with few changes in the line of contact to the west, leaving the city exposed to Ukrainian artillery. With much more urban terrain than other sectors of the front, the cities of Ukraine's first line of defense - and attack - in Donbass act as protection for the flanks of adjacent towns. So far, the slowness of Russian advances has allowed Ukraine to reinforce the following positions in case of loss of towns. This is how, in addition to the privileged position at altitude, Kiev has managed to maintain control of the destroyed Ugledar with some ease and has held on for almost a year to the western part of Marinka, a suburb west of Donetsk. Now, the complicated position of Ukrainian troops simultaneously in and around Marinka and in Avdeevka compromises an important part of that front line. Hence the need to build fortifications in places that were not on the front line inherited from Minsk.

Zelensky has also given the order to fortify areas from which the war left more than a year ago, as is the case of the Belarusian border. Ukraine must also protect the territories recovered in September 2022 in the Kharkiv region. The disorderly withdrawal of Russian troops and their rapid defeat that year made Ukraine foresee that it would not have the need to defend again those territories to which the units of the Russian Federation have currently returned.

According to The Wall Street Journal , Zelensky's plan is for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to build those fortifications on the front line, something that, in places like Donbass, they will have to do as they withdraw from lost positions. In the most remote places, private initiatives will have to contribute their resources. This repeats the public-private proposal , with which the Ministry of Defense plans to reform and expand recruitment. The privatization of war involves the entry of private resources for the construction of fortifications in places where they are necessary, but also in those far from the front, a possible way to convert public capital into private capital. In the case of recruitment, Ukraine seeks to avoid the corruption that was occurring in recruitment offices. With this argument, the Ukrainian Government, closer to Milei's libertarianism than to European liberalism, wants to insist on the idea that corruption occurs fundamentally in the public sphere and that privatization is the solution to all problems.

In any case, Zelensky's insistence on expanding recruitment and the construction of fortifications indicates that this new phase to which the Ukrainian president has referred is a defensive phase for Kiev. Far from achieving its objectives of breaking the front and advancing towards the coast of the Sea of ​​Azov and Crimea, Ukraine reorganizes its forces for what, returning to the phase of war in Donbass, begins to be increasingly a trench war in the that defense is more important than attack.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/05/una-n ... more-28689

An uncomfortable blockage
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/04/2023

Image

Since November 6, Polish trucks have partially blocked three border posts between Ukraine and Poland. Absolutely essential for Kiev both to receive military assistance and to replace the sea route as a priority outlet for its agricultural exports, Poland has since 2022 been a logistics center without which the West would never have been able to organize the constant supply of weapons, ammunition and humanitarian aid. Despite the historical differences between the two countries - especially with regard to the glorification of those groups that, during the Second World War and at the hands of Nazi Germany, massacred the Polish population of Ukraine -, Warsaw has also been an ally crucial for Kiev in its fight for more aid from the West. However, the economic contradictions caused by the privileges granted by the European Union to Ukraine in the form of elimination of quotas and other demands have caused serious problems in certain sectors of the bordering countries.

In summer, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland and Bulgaria threatened the European Union with imposing unilateral vetoes if the bloc lifted, as it finally did, the restrictions it had been forced to impose due to protests by the agricultural sector of those countries. The crisis not only resulted in the threat of filing lawsuits before the World Trade Organization, but also in an inappropriate exchange of statements by allied countries. Still, the lofty rhetoric is not comparable in severity to the current crisis, which has been going on for weeks now and has revealed the limits of the alliance between Ukraine and its geographically and ideologically closest countries.

The protests of the Polish transport sector have proven to be more serious than the reluctance of its Government, which has always sought to accommodate, although with the limitations typical of an executive that protects its interests, to Ukrainian demands. For weeks, blockades have delayed or paralyzed transit between Poland and Ukraine. This week, truckers have had to deny the latest Ukrainian accusation of preventing the passage of humanitarian aid. The fact that the Ukrainian Government has resorted to the accusation of depriving the most vulnerable population of essential goods shows concern about the situation. “Your gigantic contribution to Ukraine's victory in this war is being erased by a group of marginals who are blocking the delivery of humanitarian aid to a country that is defending its independence and the security of Europe for the second year,” he wrote these days. Andriy Sadoviy, the radical mayor of Lviv, one of the most nationalist cities in Ukraine.

The lofty rhetoric of different political representatives also shows the Ukrainian hysteria, which does not really refer to the humanitarian issue but to the economic one. kyiv must be aware that the current economic difficulties in Eastern Europe will not disappear when EU accession negotiations begin. Hence the concern has increased and has given way to reproaches. For kyiv, the inability of the parties, including the European Union itself, to resolve a conflict between allied countries is also worrying.

Far from improving, the crisis has worsened in recent days. The protests of the transport sector have also been joined by the agricultural sector, ready to pressure again in search of protectionist measures that prevent the entry of Ukrainian products. The movement that has occurred in Poland is repeated, although to a lesser extent, also in Slovakia. The Ukrainian border service confirmed the blockade, while Slovakia insisted that the blockade will not affect humanitarian aid, live animals, fuel or refrigerated products, or civilian traffic. It seems evident that the Slovak blockade is directed against agricultural products such as grain. However, if it consolidates, it is foreseeable that accusations similar to those that Ukraine has directed against Poland will be repeated, especially taking into account the position of categorical rejection of the delivery of military assistance of the new Slovak Government. In both cases, the Ukrainian authorities demand that the governments resolve the blockade. Of course, kyiv also demands that the European Union maintain the favorable treatment that Ukrainian products have been receiving since February 2022.

In this fight to maintain its privileges regardless of the complaints of other countries, Ukraine once again falls into its usual hypocrisy. As Politico reported last week , Deputy Minister of Infrastructure Serhiy Derkach has reported the death of two people in those kilometer-long queues that force trucks to wait for days. “Drivers are forced to wait in open fields without adequate food supplies or adequate toilets,” he denounced. The situation of queues with hours, and even days, of waiting is reminiscent of what has been seen for years in several towns on the front such as Elenovka or Gorlovka. However, in that case, the injured party was not a professional sector but the civilian population itself.

For years, the population of the Donbass People's Republics was forced to wait, sometimes in sub-zero temperatures, in queues artificially slowed down by Ukraine as they attempted to cross the front line in search of, for example, their pensions. As confirmed by the United Nations, the war in Donbass was the military conflict that comparatively affected older people the most. The deaths that occurred in those queues were never of interest to Ukraine, concerned only with its citizens and their interests.

For fundamentally political, but also economic, reasons, the blockade of Donbass, unlike the partial blockade of cross-border transit, was considered by kyiv to be a correct and fair measure. Under the cover of the fight against terrorists , Kiev deprived the most vulnerable population of Donbass of their pensions and social benefits in the area. Those who managed to register as internally displaced persons had to periodically cross the front line to obtain their benefits. They did so exposed to weather conditions and artificial delays created by Ukraine as part of the collective punishment of the blockade. A blockade imposed by Petro Poroshenko despite the fact that the Minsk agreements required the resumption of economic relations between kyiv, Donetsk and Lugansk and that Volodymyr Zelensky always refused to eliminate. Ukraine, which now demands that Poland or Slovakia prevent the blockade and allow Ukrainian goods and services to transit without restrictions through the European Union, has always clung to the economic weapon of the blockade to achieve its objectives, in this case, subduing the population of Donbass.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/04/28681/

Google Translator

*******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 4
December 4, 2023
Rybar

Image

The activity of the Russian Armed Forces in all sectors of the front has increased significantly. In the Kupyansky sector, Russian fighters destroyed another Ukrainian Armed Forces crossing in Kupyansk . Positional battles continue on the northern outskirts of Sinkovka . To the south, the military personnel occupied the Shirokaya ravine on the Torsky ledge , advancing up to a kilometer forward.

In the Soledar direction, the Russian Army occupied the Bakhmut dachas on the western outskirts of Bakhmut , forcing the Ukrainian formations to retreat. Fierce fighting is taking place in the area of ​​tactical heights near Kleshcheevka .

On the northern flank of Avdeevka, Russian troops are fighting on the approaches to Stepovoy , simultaneously expanding the zone of control at the Avdeevka coke plant . The enemy is actively using armored vehicles in this area in order to stop the advance of the Russian Armed Forces.

In the Orekhovsky sector, the Russian Armed Forces went on the offensive at the Rabotino - Verbovoye line : the enemy transferred forces to other directions, which created good conditions for a counterattack.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the Kupyansky sector, Russian military personnel continue to crush the defenses of Ukrainian formations in Sinkovka . In addition, the fighters destroyed another enemy crossing in Kupyansk , significantly reducing the logistics capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Image
Meanwhile, further south, in the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector, fighters continue to build on their success on the Torsky ledge , fighting their way to Terny . According to some reports, the Russian Armed Forces also managed to significantly advance inland near the Broad Ravine . The Ukrainian Armed Forces periodically counterattack in the forestry area towards Kremennaya , but have not yet achieved success.

Image
Russian troops are pressing on enemy positions along the entire front line in the Soledar direction . In the north, the RF Armed Forces are developing success towards Krasnoye and Bogdanovka . Thus, the fighters managed to expand the zone of control at Bakhmutskie Dachas southwest of the city.

On the southern flank, the Russian Armed Forces were able to slightly expand the zone of control near Kleshcheevka , where the main clashes take place beyond the tactical heights near the village. The settlement itself does not have any significance, since it is located in a lowland and almost completely destroyed.


In the Avdeevsky sector on the northern flank of Avdeevka, Russian military personnel expanded the zone of control at the Avdeevsky coke plant and the vicinity of Stepovoye . Positional battles continue on the southern flank south of Severny and Tonenky .


Image
In the Orekhovsky sector, Russian units are advancing towards Rabotino and in the Verbovoy area with airborne units, recapturing positions lost in the summer. The enemy uses cluster munitions to prevent a breakthrough of defensive lines. In addition, in Kamenskoye , the rotation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was disrupted and a kamikaze drone struck the Ukrainian AN-TPQ-50 radar station.

Image
In the Kherson direction in Krynki , the situation remains the same. Ukrainian formations continue to cling to a bridgehead in the populated area, trying to expand the zone of control deeper into the forest. That night, two assault groups of the 1st Battalion of the 38th Infantry Marine Corps of the Ukrainian Navy took up positions south of the greenhouses adjacent to the plantings in the south of Krynoki, which indicates a slight advance of the Marines to the south.

As a result of artillery and mortar fire from the Russian Armed Forces, the group was scattered and suffered losses. The wounded and dead were evacuated to the northern part of the village, from where they were transported to the right bank. In general, the situation in the Kherson direction has not changed . Ukrainian marines are trying to move deeper, but without significant success. However, as the weather gets colder, the Dnieper bed will freeze, which will simplify the movement of walking groups across the river. Considering that the Katran strike group has a bridgehead (of some kind), larger attacks should be expected with the glaciation of the soil and water. Just at this moment, the transfer of units of the 37th Marine Brigade began to the left bank.

Previously, the unit did not participate in battles on the left bank, and it is fully staffed. The introduction of the 37th brigade, on the one hand, indicates losses in other brigades, and on the other, an early activation of the front. What is curious: with the advent of 37 obrmp in the LBS, characteristic changes also appeared in the features of the use of the Bayraktar UAV. Within a few days, the drone takes off from the Kulbakino airfield , which has not been observed over the past year.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

In the Kursk region, the Armed Forces of Ukraine shelled the outskirts of the village of Tetkino , Glushkovsky district, and the village of Oleshnya , Sudzhansky district; there is no information about casualties. In the Belgorod region, the enemy attacked the villages of Kozinka , Glotovo and Bezymeno of the Grayvoronsky urban district, there were no casualties. In the Rostov region, air defense hit a target outside the region, without casualties or destruction.


This afternoon, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fiercely shelled populated areas of the Donetsk People's Republic . Donetsk, Gorlovka and populated areas of the Yasinovatsky district again came under attack. At least 5 people were injured of varying severity, and civilian infrastructure was again damaged.

In the Zaporozhye region, the enemy staged a massive raid on the Pologi-150 substation in Pologi , using 12 attack drones. In addition, he struck the object with artillery. The equipment was damaged and the area is being demined. In Vasilyevka , one man was wounded during the shelling; he was provided with medical assistance.

Image
The left bank of the Kherson region continues to suffer from daily shelling from the enemy. The Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked the civilian infrastructure of Nova Kakhovka , Peschanivka , Korsunka , Kakhovka , Dnepryan , Nova Zburevka and Krynok . In addition, kamikaze drone strikes and ammunition drops from drones have become more frequent: for example, in Aleshki , two employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations were injured, and yesterday in Cairo, a drone attacked the transport of a civilian; a man is in the hospital with serious injuries.

Political events
About the new order from Rheinmetall for the APU


The German concern Rheinmetall received an order for 142 million euros , providing for the production of 155-mm artillery shells for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The order will be carried out by Rheinmetall Expal Munitions , a recently acquired Spanish subsidiary. In addition, the concern announced the transfer of 40 thousand shells from the previous order in 2024, this order is planned to be completed by 2025. Next year, Rheinmetall plans to increase production to 700 thousand shells by opening new production lines in Spain , South Africa and Australia .

About the modernization of the Ukrainian Neptune missile system and other changes

Deputy Minister Ivan Gavrilyuk said that work is underway on a new variation of the Neptune rocket. “Currently, work is underway to create the so-called long Neptune ,” he said. Presumably we are talking about converting the existing R-360 missile of the Neptune complex into a ground-based version, which, theoretically, could increase the range of use to 350-400 kilometers. Work is also underway on modernizing the Buk and S-300 air defense systems, the specifics have not been specified. In addition, it is planned to increase the production of drones, armored vehicles and armored personnel carriers.

On the reasons for the failure of the information and psychological campaign of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


Documents obtained by hackers about a large-scale information and psychological campaign of the Ukrainian Armed Forces before the start of the summer counter-offensive once again confirm the truth: preparatory and support activities began before June 2023. And yes, it turns out that the goal was to pull Russian troops and fire brigades from other sections of the Northern Military District to the border with the Kharkov, Sumy and Chernigov regions. True, the implementation, as usual, let us down. However, Russian hackers obtained the documents at the beginning of the year , so there is nothing surprising in this.


On deferment of supplies of Bulgarian armored personnel carriers for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Bulgarian President Rumen Radev vetoed the already ratified agreement. Now the document will be reconsidered in parliament. According to the president, armored personnel carriers are needed primarily by Bulgaria, including for border protection, and the deputies did not assess all the risks of such a free transfer of military equipment. “I am guided by the conviction that the safety, health and lives of Bulgarian citizens must be the top priority.” However, what was most interesting was the government's reaction. Prime Minister Nikolai Denkov said that the veto would be overridden in any case. Deputy Prime Minister Maria Gabriel expressed disappointment with Radev's decision. “To the best of my knowledge, the decommissioning of the equipment occurred under the provisional governments and, to my knowledge, no measures were taken to use them in these situations.” The Deputy Prime Minister noted that it was “just a matter of time before the National Assembly does its job” and votes on the provision again. There is a majority in parliament to override a presidential veto, said National Assembly Chairman Rosen Zhelyazkov . “The president’s position is predictable and consistent. The position of the majority is also this, and it will lead to overcoming the veto, because Bulgaria’s foreign policy is based on the goal that is written in the Constitution - this is to promote the establishment of a fair international order . ” In addition, leaders of other political parties in Bulgaria also expressed their dissatisfaction with the president’s “antics,” saying that this was unacceptable for the head of a European state and a NATO member country.

On supplies to the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces of the 155-mm self-propelled gun AHS “Krab”

Recently, the Poles delivered 18 Krab self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine , which are called the “nightmare” of Russian soldiers. True, they began to destroy these self-propelled guns more often than to publish heroic videos of their use in work. At the same time, contrary to any reports that the Poles have resumed supplies of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, it is worth clarifying that the contract for Krab was concluded back in June, and the howitzers are not exactly Polish.

The fact is that the largest export agreement for the Polish military industry (worth more than $700 million) was concluded through a South Korean enterprise . The Krab is a self-propelled howitzer on a tracked chassis manufactured by Huta Stalowa Wola in collaboration with Samsung Techwin . The agreement was signed back in 2014, and in March of this year, Seoul allowed Warsaw to re-export these particular howitzers. Thus, the self-propelled guns transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces are essentially South Korean K9s: since 2014, the Poles have not been able to ensure full local production and are still purchasing the most important part - the power supply.

And although the Ukrainian military persistently promoted the “work of Polish Krabs” that “bite the occupiers,” in fact, due to their structure, howitzers cannot cope with all types of terrain and are not mobile enough in combat conditions. In addition, their stated maximum firing range of up to 40 km is in fact about 25 km.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

********

Garry Kasparov Doubled Down On His Conspiracy Theory That The US Doesn’t Want Ukraine To Win

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
DEC 4, 2023

Average pro-Ukrainian folks are finally beginning to realize that their side lost, but the radicals among them like Garry Kasparov can’t accept reality, which is why they’re cooking up the kookiest conspiracy theories about this inevitable outcome.

“NATO’s Proxy War On Russia Through Ukraine Appears To Be Winding Down”, as a result of which “Ukraine Is Bracing For A Possible Russian Counteroffensive By Fortifying The Entire Front” since Zelensky continues clinging to his messianic delusion of maximalist victory despite recently sobering up a bit. “Kiev’s Mayor, The NATO Chief, & The US’ Top General All Debunked Zelensky’s Delusions” over the past several days, however, which prompted panic among the pro-Ukrainian segment of social media.

This has most commonly taken the form of embracing doom-and-gloom narratives and embroiling themselves in vicious blame games like Olga Bazova documented in her Twitter thread here. Others like Russian chess champion and current US-based anti-Kremlin provocateur Garry Kasparov have resorted to spewing the most ridiculous conspiracy theories imaginable such as claiming that “The White House doesn’t want Ukraine to win”. It’s this second emerging trend that’ll be analyzed in the present piece.

That influential pro-Ukrainian figure actually introduced this disinformation narrative into the popular discourse back in early May before Kiev’s counteroffensive had even begun, and it was assessed here at the time that his cognitive dissonance was typical of Kiev’s average supporters. For the reader’s convenience, the top takeaway will now be shared below since it frames everything that’s since followed as proven by the collection of tweets that Bazova documented in her abovementioned thread:

“Continuing to cling to the false narrative of Kiev’s ‘inevitable victory’ in the face of irrefutable facts proving that such an outcome can’t be taken for granted risks radicalizing that side’s supporters similar in a sense to how QAnon radicalized some of Trump’s. If the counteroffensive fails and a ceasefire follows, then they’ll be inclined to concoct a modern-day ‘stab-in-the-back’ conspiracy theory to explain that scenario, which is exactly what Garry Kasparov is preemptively doing in his latest Twitter rant.”

The sequence of events detailed in this article’s introductory paragraph made it impossible for the pro-Ukrainian segment of social media to deny the spree of disadvantageous developments presently afflicting their side. Even worse, they’re rapidly converging to create a multidimensional crisis that risks completely destabilizing the socio-political situation behind the front lines, hence why they’re panicking, blaming whoever they can for this instead of taking responsibility, and even spewing conspiracy theories.

In brief, this is entirely due to the counteroffensive’s predictable failure leading to congressional gridlock over the US’ funding of NATO’s proxy war on Russia, the dilemma of which was exacerbated by the latest Israeli-Hamas war that redirected the West’s attention, financing, and arms. The counteroffensive failed because Russia won the “race of logistics”/“war of attrition” with NATO, the sanctions didn’t bankrupt its economy, and the West’s Hybrid War on Russia didn’t politically destabilize it.

It was assessed as early as June 2022 that “All Sides Of The Ukrainian Conflict Underestimated Each Other”, but Russia’s underestimation of the West only delayed this outcome, while the West’s underestimation of Russia – which provoked its special operation – made this outcome inevitable. Average pro-Ukrainian folks are finally beginning to realize this, but the radicals among them like Kasparov can’t accept reality, which is why they’re cooking up the kookiest conspiracy theories.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/garry-ka ... own-on-his

********

Intelligence documents on the Belarusian-Ukrainian border
December 5, 11:41

Image

This document, attached and verified at the highest level, is a report on several intelligence operations on the Ukrainian-Belarusian border carried out four months ago.

Several Ukrainian special task forces were involved in deep reconnaissance ahead of a possible Hail Mary-style plan to launch an offensive into Belarus, thereby expanding the US's "multilateral" proxy war against Russia.

It is unclear whether this was Kyiv's idea; a plan dictated by NATO masters; or a combination of both. Minsk, of course, was not entirely watching from the sidelines.
Now let's get to the point.
The document states “aerial reconnaissance of 130 Rbpak by MATRICE-30 crew,” in a reconnaissance report dated July 21, 2023.

“Aerial photography of the Republic of Belarus was carried out: two ascents of the Matrice-30 were made.
The flight altitude is 950 m. The electronic warfare system was not detected, communication with the remote control was not lost, GPS signals were in normal mode.
Without crossing the state border of Ukraine.

During flights in the direction of KALININO-SK-42. x: 5727537; Y: 5583485 a Grenadier video surveillance vehicle – SK-42 – was discovered. x:5727404;
Y:5583417. Designed for station monitoring of approaches to the border.
No traces or signs of the passage of enemy DRGs, as well as the movement of enemy equipment in these directions, were found.
No changes were found at the state border.
During the aerial reconnaissance, no active actions related to the enemy offensive were detected.
The terrain is wooded and impassable for enemy personnel and equipment.
This section of the state border does not require additional aerial photography.”


Look at these impenetrable swamps

Now we move on to the reconnaissance report of the “IRLANDETS” group (“Irishman”), also dated July 21, 2023.

“Reconnaissance was carried out by means of reconnaissance and military search in the direction of WAMPS in the area of ​​​​the border strip and surrounding areas.
Take-off point helicopter X: 5719499; Y: 5520355.
Beginning of the route: X: 5719667; Y: 5518682.
End of the route: X: 5719641; Y: 5522372.
The area along the recreation center and the roads leading to the recreation center were examined.
No traces or signs of passage no enemy sabotage and reconnaissance group or enemy equipment was detected.
The terrain in the reconnaissance area is impassable for enemy equipment, which is due to the natural barrier in the form of impassable swamps, dense forests, and a river flows along the border line in this square. However, this section is possible for passage personnel.
The composition of the enemy, especially the sabotage and reconnaissance group.
Confirmed the presence of minefields.
There were no accumulations of military equipment or enemy personnel near the recreation center.
Aerial reconnaissance was carried out.
We are proceeding to carry out tasks for their intended purpose in another area, according to the action plan of the group’s intelligence department.”


Let's pick some berries

Now about the RG (intel group) intelligence report “Partizan”, also dated July 21, 2023.

“The reconnaissance was carried out by searching and observing, interviewing the local population in the direction of the area PEREBRODA (X: 5733040; Y: 5499111) – ZHADEN (X: 5732068; Y: 5488281) – BUDIMLYA (X: 5726038; Y: 5498176) in the border strip area and surrounding areas.

The areas along the recreation center were examined, engineering and sapper barriers, forest and field roads leading to the recreation center were checked: the presence of anti-tank ditches, rubble and obstacles from trees, minefields.

No traces or signs of the passage of an enemy sabotage and reconnaissance group or enemy equipment were found. The reconnaissance area is conditionally passable for equipment and personnel, which is due to natural barriers, namely: reservoirs, wetlands, and engineering barriers.

Confirmed presence of minefields (SK – 42: 1)X: 5734692; Y; 5495350; 2) X: 5734724;
Y: 5495106; 3)X: 5734899; Y: 5494965; 4)X: 5735543; Y: 5497866; 5) X: 5737721; Y:5501118).
When conducting reconnaissance, optical means were used: binoculars.
The situation on the border line is calm. No sounds of movement or movement of enemy equipment were recorded.
In connection with the berry season, the local population picks berries en masse in the border forests, moving to the places on ATVs, vehicles and scooters. So, during the exploration period, these vehicles and collectors were recorded up to and including the border line.
We are starting to carry out tasks in accordance with the Action Plan of the Partizan reconnaissance group."


Like this. This was the situation four months ago. Since then, a lot has happened: a massive cessation of supplies of funds and weapons to Kyiv; attention to the war stolen by Israel; and the air battle between Zelensky and Zaluzhny. However, there is no guarantee that plans to set Belarus on fire have been shelved forever.

(c) Pepe Escobar

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/12/no_ ... o-belarus/ - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8807980.html

Google Translator

*******

The War In Ukraine Is Done

The Washington Post has produced a long, two part piece, about the failed 'counter-offensive' in Ukraine. It dispenses equal blame on the U.S. and British planning of the whole mess and the Ukrainian execution of it.

The bullet points from the first part:

Miscalculations, divisions marked offensive planning by U.S., Ukraine (archived)

Key elements that shaped the counteroffensive and the initial outcome include:
Ukrainian, U.S. and British military officers held eight major tabletop war games to build a campaign plan. But Washington miscalculated the extent to which Ukraine’s forces could be transformed into a Western-style fighting force in a short period — especially without giving Kyiv air power integral to modern militaries.
U.S. and Ukrainian officials sharply disagreed at times over strategy, tactics and timing. The Pentagon wanted the assault to begin in mid-April to prevent Russia from continuing to strengthen its lines. The Ukrainians hesitated, insisting they weren’t ready without additional weapons and training.
U.S. military officials were confident that a mechanized frontal attack on Russian lines was feasible with the troops and weapons that Ukraine had. The simulations concluded that Kyiv’s forces, in the best case, could reach the Sea of Azov and cut off Russian troops in the south in 60 to 90 days.
The United States advocated a focused assault along that southern axis, but Ukraine’s leadership believed its forces had to attack at three distinct points along the 600-mile front, southward toward both Melitopol and Berdyansk on the Sea of Azov and east toward the embattled city of Bakhmut.
The U.S. intelligence community had a more downbeat view than the U.S. military, assessing that the offensive had only a 50-50 chance of success given the stout, multilayered defenses Russia had built up over the winter and spring.
Many in Ukraine and the West underestimated Russia’s ability to rebound from battlefield disasters and exploit its perennial strengths: manpower, mines and a willingness to sacrifice lives on a scale that few other countries can countenance.
As the expected launch of the offensive approached, Ukrainian military officials feared they would suffer catastrophic losses — while American officials believed the toll would ultimately be higher without a decisive assault.


And from the second part:

In Ukraine, a war of incremental gains as counteroffensive stalls (archived)

Key findings from reporting on the campaign include:
Seventy percent of troops in one of the brigades leading the counteroffensive, and equipped with the newest Western weapons, entered battle with no combat experience.
Ukraine’s setbacks on the battlefield led to rifts with the United States over how best to cut through deep Russian defenses.
The commander of U.S. forces in Europe couldn’t get in touch with Ukraine’s top commander for weeks in the early part of the campaign amid tension over the American’s second-guessing of battlefield decisions.
Each side blamed the other for mistakes or miscalculations. U.S. military officials concluded that Ukraine had fallen short in basic military tactics, including the use of ground reconnaissance to understand the density of minefields. Ukrainian officials said the Americans didn’t seem to comprehend how attack drones and other technology had transformed the battlefield.
In all, Ukraine has retaken only about 200 square miles of territory, at a cost of thousands of dead and wounded and billions in Western military aid in 2023 alone.


All those points played a role.

My personal ones:

Both, the Ukraine and its supporters, systematically underestimated Russian capabilities. (And still do.)
Satellite reconnaissance showed Russian defense preparations on the level of the Battle of Kursk. There the German Wehrmacht, after way too long preparations, failed to break the Russian lines. The unlearned lesson from 1943: When you see defense lines like these, try something else.

Battle simulations and table top war games have a 'moral factor' input for each side. Setting your sides' factor to 10 and the enemy's factor to 0, as the U.S. and UK obviously did, will let you win every time - but has no relation to reality.
Air support would not have helped. Russian air defenses are too strong to counter it.
The decision to use barely trained, 'green' brigades without any fighting experience was a serious error.
Not to use smoke grenades and, in general, means of deception, was not reasonable at all.
To have half of the new troops, the more experienced part, fight Zelenski's already lost battle for Bakhmut, was a major political mistake.


All together made sure that the so called 'counter-offensive' never had a chance to take off. The bickering now is just an attempt to put the blame for the failure onto the other side of the table.

The Ukrainian General Zaluzny has learned from the battle. He now puts up somewhat realistic numbers to let the U.S. understand how small its chances to win really are:

Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhnyi asked Pentagon chief for 17 million rounds of ammunition

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was informed during a visit to Kyiv that Ukraine needed 17 million rounds of ammunition and that US$ 350-400 billion worth of assets and personnel would be required to liberate the country.

...
Quote from a senior Defence Forces official: "Austin was told 17 million rounds of ammunition were needed. He was stunned, to put it mildly, because you wouldn’t be able to collect that many rounds in the whole world."[/i]

The Ukrainian army does not have the ten thousands of barrels required to fire 17 million rounds. Nor has it the men to feed those imaginary guns.

Zaluzny obviously thinks that the war is lost and done with. And that it is time for politics that pursue peace:

In addition, according to a source, Austin also said Zaluzhnyi had complained privately to American generals about interference from the President’s Office [..]: "Austin told us privately that Zaluzhnyi was always complaining to his generals about the President’s Office and how it obstructed him. Well, obviously the president learned about those conversations too. And that isn’t conducive to trust."
However, the President’s Office is inclined to believe that Zaluzhnyi’s dismissal would facilitate his political career.


It is high time for the Biden administration to wrap this whole thing up. Do the usual thing: declare victory, leave and forget-about-it.

Gilbert Doctorow muse about ways to do that:

Seymour Hersh, Anatol Lieven and the desperate DC gambit to end hostilities in Ukraine while claiming ‘victory’

Whatever happens thereafter will be left for the footnotes.

Posted by b on December 5, 2023 at 7:09 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/12/t ... .html#more
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Wed Dec 06, 2023 1:17 pm

script twist
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/06/2023

Image

“Without a doubt, the winter and the analysis of our own and the enemy's capabilities make it necessary to adjust tactics,” Mikhailo Podolyak, the most prominent of the advisors to the President's Office, wrote on social media on Monday. “At the front and in the cities, we are already moving to a different tactic of war: effective defense in certain areas, continuation of offensive operations in others, special strategic operations on the Crimean peninsula and the waters of the Black Sea and defense of critical infrastructure significantly reformed,” he added. Although his extensive message later went on to reproduce the list of tasks that Ukraine's allies must fulfill, this opening perfectly defines Ukraine's intentions for the coming months and follows the official line set days before by Volodymyr Zelensky when proclaiming "a new phase of the war.

The scenario posed by Podolyak, whose rhetoric has nothing to do with the euphoria of past months, is strikingly similar to what happened in the winter of 2022-2023, when Ukraine continued to attack in the Kremennaya-Svatovo area, remained on the defensive on much of the rest of the front line and prioritized attacks on the Russian rear. Although it is the circumstances and difficulties inherent to winter war conditions that force Kiev to modify its tactics and deny itself - Zelensky and his military authorities had insisted that the offensive would continue in winter - the relative surprise of the plan lies precisely in the fact that it can be considered an implicit admission of the failure of the 2023 counteroffensive. If Zelensky's words already heralded a new phase, which will be defensive for Ukraine, Podolyak's must be understood as the confirmation of the end of the great operation land with which Ukraine intended to break the front and place Russia before the difficult decision of sitting at the negotiating table in a position of weakness.

Therein lies the real failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive, the Western plan to seek a political victory against Russia even if there was no complete military defeat of Moscow's troops. Just fourteen months ago, with the harsh defeats of Kharkiv and Kherson - the latter with the orderly withdrawal of the only Ukrainian capital in its power due to the decision not to defend to the last man positions considered impossible to maintain -, the Russian Federation carried out a series of changes to reaffirm their will to continue fighting. Ukraine had seized the initiative and it was suggested that kyiv's troops could break the Lugansk front, putting at risk much of what they had gained since February 24. Under the orders of General Surovikin, later relieved of both that position and the aviation command after the Wagner mutiny, Russia began to build the defense line against which months later the Ukrainian tanks would collide in their failed attempt to break the front in June 2023.

Although without openly admitting the failure of the initial plan or publicly referring to the shortcomings that had become evident throughout the first six months of the special military operation , Moscow gave the order to mobilize 300,000 recruits to balance the superiority of troops that had made it possible for Ukraine to extend the front enough to make its defense unviable. Finally, faced with the evidence of having fallen behind in an important aspect for modern warfare, drone technology, the Russian Federation turned to one of its allies, Iran, in what would be a turning point in the Russian operation. The use of drones, whose prototype manufacturing and improvement based on what was acquired from Iran and what was learned on the front, has been one of the aspects in which Russian performance has changed most significantly.

At that time, when Western politicians criticized Russia for having had to turn to Tehran for technical assistance, media outlets like Newsweek wondered “how long Moscow can continue fighting.” Months earlier, in the summer of 2022, the same medium published an article in which it stated that Moscow would run out "of weapons and ammunition before the end of the year." Currently, the script twist occurs after months of fighting on the front, with Ukraine on the defensive throughout the eastern front, especially around Donetsk, the most fortified area of ​​the line of contact inherited from the Donbass war, and with Russia trying to regain the initiative, not only in defense, but also in attack.

It is no longer Russia that is at risk of lacking missiles or ammunition, but this week's breaking headlines warn about the United States' warnings of the dangerous proximity to the moment when the aid fund for Ukraine will be empty. , something that could happen this month. The White House announcement adds an extra dose of drama to what, in reality, is a new attempt to force Congress to approve the $60 billion it demands to guarantee financing of the Ukrainian Armed Forces until the elections of November, eliminating this issue from the electoral agenda. “The warning, delivered in a frank letter to Congress President Mike Johnson, was the Biden administration's latest salvo against a growing number of Republicans who say they are tired of bearing the costs and political capital of an ongoing war. “It could go on for years,” The New York Times wrote on Monday , making the objective of the statements clear.

A year after the Russian army was practically defeated, it is not the journalists close to the Kremlin who warn that there will be no good news from the front but it is the Secretary General of the United Nations who warns of this. Ukraine has once again recovered the idea of ​​the “second army in the world” to justify military failure and The Economist affirms that “for now”, “Russia is winning the war” and The Washington Post warns that “the victory for Ukraine is quite less likely than years of war and destruction.” The sad tone of the American media is clearly expressed in the article in which it describes how nothing has gone as kyiv expected in the counteroffensive. “The objective for the first 24 hours was to advance almost nine miles, reaching the town of Rabotino, a first push south towards the more ambitious objectives of recapturing Melitopol, a city near the Sea of ​​Azov, and cutting off Russian supply lines. ”. Rabotino was to be the trigger for the battle for the southern territories and the lost coast of the Sea of ​​Azov. However, six months later, Rabotino has been the climax of a failed operation that, yes, could have a sequel.

In his message published on Monday, in which he implicitly admitted the failure of the offensive plans, Mikhailo Podolyak called for militarization and massive supply of weapons and financing to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. “Now, all our resources are aimed at increasing domestic production of weapons and accelerating negotiations with partners to increase supplies of critical equipment for the new stage of offensive operations,” he explained, requesting air defense systems, long-range missiles , drones and electronic warfare equipment. Adding that “the stage of the war is clear, the needs are evident and the optimal adjustments to tactics are being made,” the advisor to the President's Office announced the start of production of the second part of the great offensive that will change war. Judging by the demands, Ukraine expects from its partners not only more than what they received this year, but much more than they are capable of producing. According to what Ukrainska Pravda published on Monday , Valery Zaluzhny is demanding 17 million rounds of ammunition from international suppliers, a far cry from the one million rounds promised by the European Union within a year and which it already admits it will not be able to deliver. Like any sequel, the second part of the Ukrainian counteroffensive will require high production costs and, perhaps, several rewrites of the script.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/06/giro-de-guion/

Google Translator

********

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 5
December 6, 2023
Rybar

Image

The Russian army continues to push back the enemy in different sectors of the front. Near Bakhmut, the offensive continues in the area of ​​the Valyanovsky nursery , as well as at the heights near Kleshcheevka : the enemy, due to a lack of personnel, is gradually sagging under the pressure of the Russian Armed Forces. In general, over the past week the fighters have significantly improved their position in this area.

In the Kupyansky sector, Russian fighters are gaining a foothold on the northern outskirts of Sinkovka , the enemy is holding the central part of the village, which is important for defense. Near Kremennaya, the enemy tried to launch a counterattack, but was driven back by artillery strikes.

In the Verbovoy area , the Russian Armed Forces recaptured some of the positions lost several months ago. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are experiencing problems with personnel in this area due to the transfer of manpower and equipment to more problematic areas of the front. In Krynki in the Kherson direction, the situation has not undergone significant changes: the Russian Army in every possible way prevents the enemy from carrying out rotation, striking at evacuation sites, which affects the losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Massive raid of Ukrainian Armed Forces drones on Crimea

After midnight, Ukrainian formations launched several groups of drones from the outskirts of Zaporozhye in the direction of Crimea , the route of which skirted the airspace of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions . The first two drones were shot down over Genichesk , and the rest headed across the Sea of ​​Azov to Kerch and Feodosia . Three more UAVs were shot down near Bagerovo . Judging by the direction, the target was the positions of the 31st division in the Kerch region, photos of which appeared on the Internet a couple of days ago.

Also, 11 drones were shot down and suppressed on approach to Feodosia, and two more right at the oil terminal. Apparently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces intended to hit the oil depot and power plant in the city. And 17 others were hit at Cape Chauda - the drones were maneuvering, trying to enter Russian positions from the sea. A total of 35 UAVs were destroyed , of which 15 were shot down by air defense, 13 were suppressed by electronic warfare, and seven were hit by small arms.

The attack by Ukrainian forces occurred immediately after a slight improvement in weather conditions. There was an RQ-4B UAV in the air, which, after the 31st Air Force and Air Defense Division began operating, departed into Romanian airspace . Typically, such drone raids are intended to check and evaluate the work of the 31st air and air defense divisions in the east of the peninsula. And only after, if we take into account previous attempts, a missile attack occurs. Taking this into account, in the next few days, under favorable conditions, attempts at strikes on Crimea are quite possible. Moreover, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have means of destruction. Just the other day, a batch of Storm Shadow/SCALP cruise missiles was delivered to Starokonstantinov .

The situation on the front line and combat operations

In the Kupyansky sector, the Russian army is gaining a foothold on the northern outskirts of Sinkovka , and fierce fighting continues. The enemy does not intend to retreat from the populated area, since it is strategically important for the defense of Kupyansk , which explains the slow advance of the Russian Armed Forces in this direction. To the south, in the Kremennaya area , the enemy attempted a counterattack with forces of the 67th mechanized brigade and Azov detachments . After entering the trenches, the enemy came under artillery fire, after which he was forced to retreat with losses. In addition, in Cossack Lopan , a blow was struck at the base of the local defense detachment, as a result of which the Ukrainian Armed Forces suffered losses in manpower. Local authorities announced the attack on the medical transport at the outpatient clinic. In reality, due to its proximity to the front line, there has been no local population in the settlement for a long time: almost all infrastructure facilities have been occupied by Ukrainian formations.


In the Soledar direction, the Russian Armed Forces are expanding the zone of control north of Bakhmut , trying to cut the route along which the enemy supplies the group in Krasnoye . On the southern flank in the Kleshcheevka area , Russian units improved their tactical position near the prevailing heights. In general, in this area, Russian military personnel confidently hold the initiative in their hands: over the past two weeks, they have managed to liberate almost all the territories lost during the previous six months of fighting.


At the Avdeevsky site the situation has not undergone significant changes. Along the contact line there is a counter-battery fight and work to destroy Ukrainian armored vehicles and manpower. Thus, near Novomikhailovka one armored fighting vehicle of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was hit, and in Berdychi a blow was struck at the enemy concentration area. In addition, the transfer of enemy units to the Yasinovat industrial zone was noted.

Image
In the Orekhovsky sector near Verbov , assault detachments of the 15th National Guard Brigade intended to advance near the village, where they came under artillery fire. As a result, in addition to losses in manpower, the armored fighting vehicle was destroyed. In turn, the Russian paratroopers counterattacked and were able to recapture several enemy strongholds in the landings. The Ukrainian Armed Forces went completely on the defensive, periodically trying to attack in order to improve the tactical position. But there are no reserves for a large-scale offensive. The same 15th regiment has been in the vanguard in recent weeks, which has significantly affected its combat effectiveness. Partially the units of this formation are withdrawn, and they are replaced by forces of the 33rd brigade.

Image
In the Kherson direction in Krynki , the situation remains the same. Ukrainian formations are clinging to a bridgehead in a populated area, repeating the same scenario over and over again. During these days there were no attempts to advance deeper, but the Ukrainian Armed Forces again tried to equip positions and shelters in the northern part of the forest, where they were attacked by Russian artillerymen.

Because of this, the assault groups once again suffered losses, the wounded were evacuated, and two new groups were transferred to replace them. However, due to constant fire from the RF Armed Forces, the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have the opportunity to carry out normal rotation, so if the wounded do not reach the point of departure, then the evacuation group does not move out to search for them due to the risk of being destroyed.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas
In the Kursk region, the Ukrainian Armed Forces struck the outskirts of the village of Volfino , no casualties were reported. In the Belgorod region , the village of Poroz came under fire ; no official information was received. In the evening, in the sky over the Belgorod region , air defense units shot down 3 aircraft-type UAVs, no one was injured. Debris fell in the village of Repnom , damaging one car.

Image
Ukrainian formations continue to daily strike populated areas of the Donetsk People's Republic . Donetsk , Yasinovataya and Makeevka came under fire , residential buildings and civilian infrastructure were damaged, one person was killed and another was wounded in Gorlovka.

Image
The left bank of the Kherson region is again under attack from the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Since the night, the enemy has fired dozens of shells at such populated areas as Golaya Pristan , Novaya Kakhovka , Proletarka , Peschanovka , Korsunka , Aleshki , Kakhovka and Krynki . Dnepryan was attacked by an attack drone; there were no casualties, but several houses were damaged.

Political events
On finding a place for the production of shells in Azerbaijan for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


Another example of the role of OSINT in obtaining vital information in modern realities: a Ukrainian activist decided to boast that a certain “partner country” had organized the production of 122-mm shells and posted footage from the workshops. However, a journalist from the RTVI channel noticed in the recording and photographs information stands with the symbols of Palladium Defense and Security Solutions , an Azerbaijani company with headquarters in Baku. It is officially a partner of Ukroboronprom, which can be seen on the official website of the company.

In fact, this is the first objective evidence of the production and supply of ammunition by Azerbaijan to the Kyiv regime. This is happening, most likely, also with the money of Great Britain : according to exactly the same scheme, the Azerbaijanis previously sent mine clearance equipment to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Well, the position of the authorities in Baku regarding the SVO has been known for a long time. It is reckless to expect its changes, primarily due to the (in)action of domestic departments and ministries, which in fact do not react in any way even to the arrest of pro-Russian journalists in the country.

On the reasons for the failure of the summer counteroffensive according to the Washington Post

If we summarize what was written in the sensational article by The Washington Post about the failure of the summer Ukrainian counteroffensive, then several points can be particularly highlighted:

A common thread running through the entire material is the narrative that the Ukrainian Armed Forces simply “fought incorrectly.” This is one of the latest current trends in the Western expert media field. Naturally, no one in the West plans to admit the inconsistency of their own forecasts and misleading assessments . What looks especially funny against the backdrop of references to the huge role of NATO in the development of the operation.

The words that the offensive was originally planned to begin at the end of April again indirectly confirm the wounding of Zaluzhny, who disappeared just at that time. In Kyiv, they decided to postpone the attack and the Ukrainian Armed Forces units stood in deployed combat formations for more than a month, which the Russian Armed Forces took advantage of very effectively. Zaluzhny himself is portrayed as incompetent and almost the main culprit of the failure. This is not surprising: for almost a year the media artificially created the charm of a military genius for him, and when the opposite turned out to be the case, they decided to take revenge on the Ukrainian general for not living up to expectations.

But the main point is still different: when reading the text, one cannot help but notice the expressed condescending attitude towards both sides of the conflict. Ukrainian formations are criticized for their inability to reach NATO levels, and the successes of the Russian Armed Forces are reduced to “being littered with corpses” (and a few minefields with ATGMs). In fact, after all this time in the West, at least at some levels, the perception of the Russian armed forces in the spirit of the most base propaganda still persists. We will not be at all surprised if this backfires more than once on the swaggering NATO armies.

On the reasons for the lack of prisoner exchange


After the return of fighters from the Azov national regiment from Turkey , all prisoner exchanges with the Ukrainian side were stopped due to violations of behind-the-scenes agreements. The fact is that almost every second exchange with the Ukrainians took place with violations: the lists were agreed upon in advance, but when the exchanges began, the Ukrainians handed over the wrong people. And the point here is not that the Russian side was against the return of the conditional Ivan Petrov - no. It’s just that when we are talking about equivalent exchanges “officer for officer”, lists of names are agreed upon, and the Russian side does its part, and the enemy gives completely different people of a completely different rank - this is a completely different calico.

As a result, the return of the Azov team was the last straw and led to the fact that the exchanges were stopped until November. On the eve of the New Year, another round of negotiations began: it is planned to carry out a chain of exchanges and return several batches of people before the holidays. But the lists were submitted for approval to the SBU back in November, and the processes that were supposed to begin on December 1 are still stalled - due to the fault of the Ukrainian side. Of course, in country 404 they did not forget to lay down straws and notify through the structure controlled by the GUR that this is all insinuation, and in Kyiv there are only people who are pure in their hands and thoughts. But that's not true. And people are now not returning from captivity because of delays on the Ukrainian side.

Finland will increase the production of ammunition for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

The final decision has been made, details should be announced within a few weeks “The plan is ready. A plan has now been announced to significantly increase ammunition production. The goal is to support Ukraine even stronger than it is now. At the same time, we are further increasing the readiness of Finland and the Nordic region for ammunition production ,” said Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen . In his words, “Finland can take on a role larger than its population in the production of ammunition for Ukraine .”

On the transfer of Belgian F-16s

Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said following the negotiations that Belgium will transfer F-16s to Ukraine in 2025. Despite this late date, the Ukrainian country plans to begin supplying spare parts and equipment for aircraft now.


On the prospects for Ukraine’s accession to the EU and opposition from Hungary

According to Reuters, the heads of 27 EU countries will begin negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova on future possible accession to the bloc at a summit on December 14-15. However, this is the first version of the declaration and may be changed in the future as a result of negotiations between representatives of member countries before the summit. However, not all so simple. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban wrote a letter to the President of the European Council, Charles Michel , for the second time , in which he calls not even to discuss the decision to allocate the next tranche of financial assistance to Ukraine and not to begin negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the EU. The latter was even forced to return early from his trip to China, and Macron allegedly invited Orban to France to search for a compromise solution.

“There is an expectation that on this occasion of the summit the European Council can and should approve the decision to begin accession negotiations with Ukraine and revise the Multiannual Financial Framework for the 2021-2027 budget. Given the current level of political and technical preparations, these expectations are not justified ,” Orban said in a letter to the President of the European Council. The Prime Minister complains that the EU made such a hasty decision without preliminary discussions with other countries. Discussions regarding the allocation of funds from the EU budget in the amount of 50 billion euros are focused on the “unfounded, unbalanced and unrealistic proposal of the European Commission.” According to Orban, due to the lack of time for a thoughtful decision, the European Union should not discuss these issues in December, since it will not be possible to achieve complete unanimity on the part of all EU countries. However, we should not forget that voices have already been repeatedly heard in the EU that in the absence of a collegial decision on a particular issue, the EU may move to the practice of making decisions without the consent of individual countries. This means that even despite a certain reluctance of Hungary to allocate money and see Ukraine in the EU, it may simply not be asked.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

On the way to Patriot Park
December 5, 20:30

Image

The captured American Bradley infantry fighting vehicle is being dragged to the rear.
Next year, don’t forget to visit the exhibition of captured equipment in the Patriot Park in Alabino. Surely this "Bradley" will be there.

Image

Image

How the trophy was pulled out.

The first attempts to get Bradley out were unsuccessful, and now the task came to our fighter.
They gave us an ARV with a crew, and under the cover of fog the group moved to the point. The route lay through the “road of death,” as the soldiers dubbed it, since a section more than a kilometer long is clearly visible from the AKHZ: there are constantly drones in the sky that adjust the artillery, kamikazes fly in a swarm, covering everyone indiscriminately. It was difficult to walk along this road on foot, not to mention heavy equipment, which was already being hunted.

The first time, as already said, it was not possible to pull it out... The barefoot BRADLEY sat tightly in the mud, the cables were torn and the tow hooks flew off, the enemy also heard the rumble of the BRAM, there was little time and we had to return with nothing.

The enemy, understanding the plan, apparently remotely, mined the road. On the next attempt, the ARV ran over a mine, the cumulative jet burned through the bottom behind the driver and rushed into the open hatch above it, slightly catching his thigh... The group dismounted and moved away from the damaged vehicle.

That's when the disco started. The enemy attempted to thoroughly burn the equipment and rolled out the tank, the first explosion occurred behind the retreating group, several more shells landed in the direction of the immobilized equipment, but there were no hits. When everything calmed down, the group set out to inspect the equipment, the driver, using dances with a tambourine and blue electrical tape, started the tractor and returned it to the base.

The next attempt was already on two more powerful tractors and the matter got off the ground. On the “road of death,” a kamikaze drone flew exactly over the cables between the equipment and fell on the side of the road without detonating. The group with the trophy confidently walked to the rear.


https://t.me/veles_v_okope/880 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8809399.html

There will be Black Russia!
December 5, 16:18

Image

There will be Black Russia!
Volunteers from Africa help fight Nazism in Ukraine. They have experience expelling Western colonialists from colonies.

In recent months, the number of volunteers from other countries has increased markedly. Cubans, Colombians, Syrians, Africans. People come from all over the world to fight Ukrainian Nazism and Western imperialism.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8808719.html

Google Translator

******

Updates: Ukraine Funding Again Collapses as Increasingly Isolated Zelensky Grows Despondent

ImageSIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
DEC 6, 2023

I wanted to try to write a shorter update today so as to not overload those who may still be digesting yesterday’s voluminous mailbag.

The most important developments on the docket are that Zelensky was supposed to address Congress in a classified meeting tonight, which was for some reason cancelled at the last minute. One of the potential explanations is that the Republicans have snubbed Biden and the Democrats’ overtures to unlock the Ukrainian funding, as the Rs simply won’t budge from their demands on securing the border first.

Image

The “secret briefing” initiated by the Democrats for senators, at which it was planned to convince legislators of the importance of speedily agreeing on new aid for Kiev, completely failed The Republicans didn't even want to listen and walked out of the briefing

What are those demands exactly?

The most relevant ones revolve around asylum and parole laws in immigration proceedings. Republicans want all ‘asylum seekers’ to be detained upon entry while they await their claims to be processed. As of now they’re simply released into the country, allowing any number of them to easily escape without any legal due process.

The Democrats have rejected this, proposing instead a “streamlining” of the asylum claim process, calling Republican proposals “extreme” and claiming they would “end all asylum as we know it, and effectively shut down the border”—yeah, I think that might be the plan.

Even Lindsay Graham has suddenly backed off from his radical warhawk stance and now demands no more aid for Ukraine without securing the border. It seems like both sides are pretty adamant; one can see why—for the Democrats, shutting down illegal immigration would mean losing the next election.

As of now they have until December 15th, then there’s a recess until next year. After that, Ukraine may not get any aid until well into 2024, by which point they will already have begun experiencing the military arms equivalent of agonal breathing. A few months ago, there were reports that much of Ukraine’s critical aid like shells, etc., is given “hand to mouth.” Meaning, as soon as it rolls off the production line it’s immediately shipped and just as immediately used. They don’t have vast storehouses of it and thus the cut off would theoretically have instant ramifications on their ability to carry out basic battlefield functions.

In the meantime, the pro-UA crowd is having a meltdown. All kinds of Ukrainian analysts and figures of the commentariat have been dishing out increasingly high-pitch squeals and cries of alarm. Everyone from Arestovich, Gordon, various soldiers on the frontline—there seems to be nothing but bad news.

Western MSM is likewise drowning in doom and gloom.

Arestovich has come out and outright declared, regrettably, “we chose the wrong side.”

(Video at link)

He goes on to explain how the U.S. and West in fact can’t match Russian and Chinese industrial production because the West has completely dissolved the productive capacities that made it the powerhouse of the world during the Cold War era:

(Video at link, go watch this one, savage!)

He extrapolates the Ukrainian conflict to the wider one between the West and the entire Global South and East, and says he no longer has confidence that the West will win the overarching clash.

This is confirmed by a variety of Western reports, like this one, which states that:

Even as a war rages on the European continent, European defense spending is stuck slightly above neutral, with an overlapping set of political and industrial problems blocking any quick increases in capabilities and styming supplies to Ukraine.

Image
Source

What the above article goes into is the now widespread narrative that NATO as a whole needs to increase its military production to Cold War levels and a general sense that everything should be militarized to an almost WW2 scale.

What underpins this recent imperative amongst the Western MIC intelligentsia is the growing claim that Russia “will not stop at Ukraine” and intends to attack [insert nation here] next.

This was highlighted by a National Review article, amongst many others:

Image

Image

(Video at link.)

Image

The above represents the loudest such claim in recent days. It declares outright that in three years’ time Russia may hit the countries on NATO’s eastern flank, as per a Polish national security agency head.

It also cites a German thinktank which claims that NATO must be ready to “fend off a Russian offensive in 6 to 10 years.”

Jacek Siewiera, chief of Poland’s National Security Bureau, says

“Unfortunately this analysis is consistent with studies drawn up in the US,” he told Nasz Dziennik, a Polish Catholic newspaper. “But in my opinion the time frame presented by the German analysts is too optimistic. If we want to avoid war, the Nato countries on the eastern flank should adopt a shorter, three-year time horizon to prepare for confrontation.”

He goes on to point out the real specter that has the West so frightened, Russia’s ramping industrial capabilities:

Siewiera added: “This is the time window when we have to create a capability on the eastern flank that would provide a clear signal deterring aggression. The arms industry in Russia is working in three shifts [each day] and can rebuild its resources within the next three years.”

In what seems a coordinated effort, every Western shill is now scrounging corner to corner for anything that can even remotely resemble some clue of Russia’s putative ‘designs’ against Europe. For instance, Anton Gerashchenko posted this Soloviev episode which he claims spells out Russian designs to completely upturn Europe, recreating a special Austro-Hungarian zone.

Such fantasies now dominate the headlines, with every little offhand remark Putin makes used to rubberstamp some new wild dream about rebirthing the Russian Empire. For instance, a new such remark Putin made about Latvia’s persecution of ethnic Russians was contorted into a claim by MSM that Putin had now threatened Latvia, designating them as “next” after Ukraine.

This fraudulent specter of Russian imperialism is being ginned-up to spin fear through the dim European populace and galvanize Ukraine’s sagging support.

But more insidiously, it represents the projection and telegraphing of NATO’s own plans to continue drawing Russia through an ever-denser gauntlet of war to continuously undermine its development as a sovereign superpower. I wrote about this in the latest reader’s mailbag, but the recently intensifying drumbeats of war make me almost certain that a far larger European conflict is looming at the horizon.

The National Review article even ends on this foreboding note:

The bottom line is that the Kremlin plans to change the world order, especially in terms of security, and the conquest of Ukraine is a first step in that plan. If the West abandoned Ukraine now, it would be further exposing NATO to Russian aggression in the years to come. Instead, in order to avert the danger from Russia, NATO and the EU must hold strong in their support for Ukraine and continuing developing their military capabilities. The Russian threat must be neutralized, and this is the only way to do it.

But their clumsy narrative-hopping exposes a major flaw in this new Western propaganda train.

They, like others, argue that Russia is massively expanding its military, earmarking extraordinary new budgets for 2024 and beyond, which is used to adumbrate some looming future conquests. Yet in the same breath, they comically argue that the push for ceasefire is a major Russian propaganda thrust serving Russia’s interests to end the war and cement new territorial gains. Therefore, they argue, the West should at all costs continue funding Ukraine militarily to thwart this insidious Russian plan to use the ceasefire triumph as a major validation of its conquest.

Think that through for a second. Russia is vastly expanding its budgets and planning to conquer all of Europe, yet at the same time, it is Russia that is clamoring to end the war, and that a ceasefire is a “Russian propaganda” directive? How does that make sense?

That’s on the same order of stupidity as the earlier posted Tweet, which highlights Ukraine’s claim that only joining NATO would protect it by deterring Russia from ever attacking again, yet at the same time absurdly propounds that Russia is set to attack other NATO members after it conquers Ukraine. So what possible protection can NATO offer?

It’s just risible bile, and shows the utter moral and intellectual destitution of the declining West’s late stage propaganda efforts—they’re not even trying anymore. Just observe doltish Stoltenberg who pantomimes concern with his bovine blinks while expectorating some nonsense like: “We must bring peace by continuing to arm Ukraine!”

It’s a veritable gallery of clowns!

(Much more at link, check it out)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/upd ... -collapses

Is he implying that the Dems need the votes of 'illegal' immigrants? Don't think so, don't think fraud on that scale is possible. What the Dem party needs is euthanasia.

********

Ukraine’s Political Intrigue Deepens As The SBU Alleges A Poroshenko-Orban-Russian Plot

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
DEC 6, 2023

After having crossed the Rubicon of implying that the same man who waged the first Donbass War is either a Russian agent or at least that country’s useful idiot, it’s anyone’s guess what happens next, but the past month’s precedent suggests that more drama is likely.

Reuters reported over the weekend that Ukraine’s secret police, the SBU, wrote on social media that former President Poroshenko was prevented from crossing the border into Poland because of his alleged plans to meet with Hungarian Prime Minister Orban. They were quoted as saying that “Russia planned to use this meeting (like other 'working meetings with ... representative of countries voicing pro-Russian narratives) in psychological operations against Ukraine.”

It was assessed just days prior to this incident that “Ukraine’s Latest Paranoia About Russian Sleeper Cells Is Dividing Its Security Services” after National Security Council chief Danilov suspiciously retracted his claim to the Times of London that the SBU is rife with Russian spies. That official was likely emboldened to share his concerns with British media after Zelensky himself publicly speculated that Russian spies inside the country were supposedly conspiring to stage a “Maidan 3” regime change against him.

Even before he made such a contentious claim, political intrigue had already returned to Ukraine after Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny’s admission that the conflict was at a stalemate worsened his long-running rivalry with Zelensky, which the New York Times drew everyone’s attention to last month. Around that same time, Zelensky’s former advisor Arestovich slammed him after Time Magazine’s damning cover story in late October disclosed a lot of embarrassing details about the Ukrainian leader.

Just last weekend as the Poroshenko incident was transpiring along the de facto blockaded Polish border, Kiev Mayor Klitschko told Der Spiegel that Zelensky was behaving like a dictator, thus further broadening the number of his political rivals in the span of a single month. Putting them all together, it can be said that Arestovich, Zaluzhny, Klitschko, and now Poroshenko have all soured on Zelensky and publicly challenged him each in their own way, which bodes badly for the Ukrainian leader’s political future.

The SBU’s latest statement on social media makes the Zelensky-Poroshenko rivalry the most scandalous by far, however, since the secret police have yet to allege that any of the others are part of a Russian plot in any capacity like they claimed that the former Ukrainian President was. For what it’s worth, his party denied that he had any plans to meet with Orban and warned the SBU from meddling in domestic politics, so it’s unclear which of these two is lying even though one of them obviously is.

In any case, this latest incident deepens the political intrigue in Ukraine, and it also proves that the SBU remain loyal to Zelensky since they made such a spectacle out of supposedly protecting him from the alleged Poroshenko-Orban-Russia plot. After having crossed the Rubicon of implying that the same man who waged the first Donbass War is either a Russian agent or at least that country’s useful idiot, it’s anyone’s guess what happens next, but the past month’s precedent suggests that more drama is likely.

As the military, political, and financial dimensions of the Ukrainian Conflict continue winding down, all preexisting fault lines within that country which had hitherto been frozen due to each stakeholder’s shared pursuit of victory are expected to re-emerge. It’s premature to claim that a power struggle is taking place since the SBU still controls the situation, but one might very well be right around the corner if just one military, intelligence, or security faction decisively turns against Zelensky in the coming future.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraines ... ue-deepens
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Thu Dec 07, 2023 11:12 am

The economic factor
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/07/2023

Image

In parallel with the work of acting as a pressure group in search of US financing, Ukraine approved its budget for 2024 this week. As the Ministry of Finance had already anticipated last month, defense spending accounts for more than half of what was budgeted. This exceeds the spending pattern that has been observed according to the data for the first seven months of 2023 in which military spending already accounted for 48%. These data offered in August also help to estimate the percentage of spending that debt service represents for Ukraine, more than 8%. Adding this percentage to the more than 50% of the budget represented by defense items, Ukraine finds itself in a situation in which it allocates around 60% of its spending to the war and paying its debts, leaving only the remaining 40% for the maintenance of the functioning of the State, infrastructure, education, health, pensions or social benefits for the most vulnerable population, especially the internally displaced population.

Ukraine, which insists that every hryvnia collected by the State is used for the defense of the country, has presented accounts with a clear imbalance between expenses and income, in which it expects an increase due to the increase in VAT. As reported by media such as Reuters , “the Government expects a budget deficit of $43 billion in 2024 and plans to cover it with national loans and financial assistance from its Western partners.” The Ukrainian forecast is to receive 41 billion dollars from its foreign allies with which to cover its budgets and keep the State and its Armed Forces afloat.

The enormous amounts of assistance received, 68,000 in financial assistance of the more than 233 billion dollars that Ukraine has obtained since February 24, 2022, and the lack of results on the front call into question the viability of the entire common war project against Russia. The situation is especially sensitive for Zelensky at a time when the difficulties on the front are combined, the arrival of a winter that may be even harsher than the past and the paralysis caused by Joe Biden's inability to get Congress to approve the funds it needs to finance Ukraine until the US elections in November 2024.

The economy had to be, or so the US and European Union authorities naively hoped, the element that would determine the war in favor of Ukraine. With the European Union and NATO as sponsors, suppliers of weapons and ammunition and managers of financial assistance that kept the country's state structures standing, the Western hypothesis assumed that Russia would not be able to overcome, in the isolation they expected that occurred, the effect of the sanctions. The value of the ruble would collapse, the industry would not be able to obtain the technology necessary to continue producing, the veto on oil and gas would leave the Kremlin with insufficient income and the economy would be headed for collapse. A year and a half later, military Keynesianism has reduced unemployment, the Western press warns that the military industry works three shifts a day and the IMF has reported 2.2% GDP growth in Russia in 2023 compared to 2. 1% from the United States, 1% from France, 0.5% from the United Kingdom and a drop of half a point from Germany.

As the second anniversary approaches of the moment when the European Union and NATO committed to assist Ukraine as long as necessary , until final victory, doubts about the possibility of maintaining the Ukrainian state indefinitely increase as they do so as well. the obstacles to guaranteeing US assistance. Ukraine not only needs financial assistance to keep its institutions afloat, but also the weapons sent by the United States to continue the war.

This blockade has been the reason for the trip of Andriy Ermak, the green cardinal of Kiev and Zelensky's right-hand man, who during his visit to the United States has tried to pressure Congress to approve a new batch of funds. Perfectly coordinated with the US authorities, Ermak has insisted that “the rope is running out,” an expression previously used by John Kirby, and the funds will run out before the end of the year. For kyiv, it is especially important to secure such American funding for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, since without it, calls for negotiations would inevitably increase. In recent hours, messages written on social networks have highlighted the concern that publications from various Western media have caused in Zelensky's entourage, which increasingly point to the need to negotiate a solution to the conflict. The main failure of the 2023 counteroffensive has been precisely that kyiv has not achieved sufficient military strength to be able to negotiate with Russia in a position of strength, the only circumstance in which Ukraine is willing to sit down for dialogue with Moscow. Hence the importance of the visit of Ermak and Umarov, Minister of Defense, to the United States at this time. For weeks now, Ermak has been talking about the preparation of a new offensive for 2024, while Umarov has added, in an appearance on Fox News - his way of directly addressing Donald Trump and the Republican minority that follows him - that Ukraine " has a plan” for next year. The problem is that kyiv and its partners also had a plan for 2023 and its failure is what has led to the current situation.

The highlight of this race to pressure the Republican Trumpist minority to approve the funds required for Ukraine was to be the virtual appearance of Volodymyr Zelensky in the closed briefing for senators and congressmen. “The Biden administration organized Zelensky's Zoom aware that he is his country's most effective defender when it comes to speaking to Republicans,” Politico wrote hours before the scheduled appearance. “It is very difficult to confront him when he is talking about good versus evil, what is happening to his country and what Ukraine needs to survive,” the outlet quotes Ermak as saying.

The failure of the operation was evident when, at the last minute, President Zelensky canceled his appearance before the senators, an absence that Umarov wanted to excuse in his appearance on Fox News . Hours later, what was expected was consummated: the Republican minority is still unwilling to stop using the issue of financing for Ukraine as an electoral tool. After Biden's new failure, Mike Johnson, president of the United States House of Representatives, who is markedly pro-Ukrainian and who in the initial phase of the mobilization of resources for Kiev was openly in favor of military assistance, insisted on the Republican refusal. He did so in response to Biden's attempt to secure that funding by tying it to assistance to Israel, Taiwan and “protection” of the border wall. Biden thus wanted to offer the Republicans a proposal that they could not reject and with which they would not only finance Israel's war against Gaza, but also the border between the United States and Mexico.

In an election year, Johnson has made it clear that Republicans are going to continue putting pressure, not necessarily against Ukraine, but to achieve much more than Biden is willing to give up on migration. Johnson is not only demanding funding for the wall, but also fundamental changes in immigration policy, to which he has added that this is the hill on which the party is willing to die . The pressure against Biden does not abate and thus jeopardizes the approval, at least with the speed with which kyiv demands it, of the new funds to finance the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Without being able to count on the miracle weapon of Zelensky's appearance, Joe Biden, in a solemn appearance in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, demanded approval of the funds he requests for Kiev, claiming that "we cannot allow Putin to win." . The nervousness over the way Congress is delaying approval of funding for Ukraine is palpable. These delays and uncertainty put more pressure on the European Union, which is responsible for paying for the United States despite the fact that some of its member countries, such as Germany, are now in a time of budget

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/07/el-factor-economico/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the NWO zone: chronicle for December 6
December 7, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Soledar direction, Russian troops have been holding the initiative for more than a week, putting pressure on the enemy in three sectors at once: on the southern flank in the Kleshcheevka area , on the northwestern flank in the Valyanovsky nursery , and also north of Soledar . Despite the attempts made by the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, it is not possible to completely contain the onslaught of the Russian Armed Forces.

In the Kupyansky sector, the enemy has begun to build a new defensive line in Petropavlovka and appears to be preparing for a scenario in which he will have to abandon Sinkovka . At the same time, in the Kherson direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces made another attempt to expand the zone of control in the Krynok area . At the same time, the command is transferring additional forces to the village, which may be aimed, among other things, at diverting the attention of the Russian Armed Forces.

Image
This afternoon, the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out a series of terrorist events directed against several public figures, as well as against the civilian population of Donbass . Celebrating their professional holiday, the Ukrainian formations wanted to intimidate those whom they used to call “separatists,” but in reality they once again showed their true colors. In the Donetsk People's Republic alone , four civilians were killed and another 30 people were injured.

Terrorist attacks on Russian territories

This afternoon in Lugansk , not far from the Avangard stadium, another terrorist attack occurred - the car of the deputy of the People's Council of the LPR Oleg Popov was blown up . The fate of the politician is still unknown: according to one information, he died, according to another, he received non-fatal injuries.

In addition, in the village of Suponevo near Moscow, a famous Ukrainian politician, ex-Verkhovna Rada deputy Ilya Kiva was killed during an evening walk . According to REN-TV, the killer started shooting at him from the back - the first bullet hit his heart, the second was a control bullet in his head. At the moment, law enforcement officers continue operational search activities.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the Kupyansky sector, fighting continues in the vicinity of Sinkovka . Russian troops, having gained a foothold on the northern outskirts of the village, took up defensive positions, and Ukrainian formations are building a new line in the event of the loss of Sinkovka. Strongholds and powerful fortifications are being established in Petropavlovka . Judging by the activity of the 41st mechanized brigade, this is where the defensive line will be built after the Sinkovka - Zagoruykovka line is broken through . There is also a transfer of reinforcements from other areas. The forces of the 3rd battalion of the 43rd infantry brigade, consisting entirely of mobilized Ukrainians, arrived in the forests near Masyutovka .

From the Svatovsky area to the plantings northeast of Kupyansk and near Sinkovka , the formations of the 108th separate mountain assault battalion of the 10th Special Operations Brigade were withdrawn. Due to the need to strengthen the defense of Kupyansk, another line has been weakened. In addition, an unidentified battalion of the 15th border detachment of the State Border Service of Ukraine appeared in Kupyansk and the surrounding area. The involvement of border guards indicates a certain shortage of personnel in the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area.

Image
In the Soledar direction, the Russian Armed Forces carried out a series of successful attacks in several areas. The liberation of Artemovsky ( Khromovo ) about a week ago can actually be considered a transfer of initiative to the Russian army at Bakhmut . Only now the Russian Armed Forces are attacking in three areas at once, and the situation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is getting worse.

On the southern flank of Bakhmut, combined Russian units successfully stormed the heights adjacent to Kleshcheevka . As a result, the Russian Armed Forces captured the tactically important height 235.7 in the north of the village. Control over this position makes it possible to keep under constant surveillance all approaches to Kleshcheevka, as well as landings to the north in the direction of Krasny ( Ivanovsky ). And the formations of the 5th Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot do anything about this due to the complete dominance of the RF Armed Forces. Also, fighters of the 102nd Regiment of the 150th Motorized Rifle Division of the Russian Armed Forces are with great success developing an offensive in a dacha cooperative southwest of Bakhmut, which was lost back in June. With further advancement, this will seriously worsen the position of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Krasnoye.

To the northwest, Russian paratroopers continue their assault from the Berkhovskoye Reservoir . Now the fighting is going on for an important stronghold, equipped in the Valyanovsky nursery . At the same time, units of the 92nd battalion of the 107th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine tried to counterattack from the outskirts of Bogdanovka , but the attack was easily repulsed. And with a retaliatory strike, the enemy assault group was destroyed.

And that's not all - Russian fighters have intensified their offensive in the north of Soledar . Operating from Belogorovka , the Russian Armed Forces servicemen managed to significantly penetrate the defenses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces along the railway line east of Vesely . This advance makes it possible to begin coverage of the Veseloye - Razdolovka line , which complicates the position of 10 OGSB in the area. With a further offensive, this may force the enemy to retreat.

In the Avdeevsky sector, the Russian Armed Forces continued to put pressure on the enemy’s flanks. There were battles near Stepovoy ( Petrovsky ) and north of AKHZ . At the same time, offensive actions were carried out from the direction of Vodyanoye , where Russian forces were trying to advance towards Severny .


A video has appeared of the evacuation of the same damaged M2A2 ODS Bradley , captured by Russian troops near Avdievka during battles with the 47th Infantry Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. According to the authors, transporting the armored vehicle to the rear was fraught with numerous difficulties. The area was clearly visible to the enemy from the heights of the coke plant, who detected any activity and opened fire from the tank, as well as launched ATGMs with FPV drones. One ARV, in the process of removing a stuck Bradley, hit a mine and the driver was injured. Ukrainian formations tried to destroy the American infantry fighting vehicle with artillery fire so that it would not fall to the Russian Armed Forces. However, Russian troops managed to pick it up earlier, using two tractors at once to tow the vehicle. Even at the very last section, the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried to burn it down with an FPV drone, but it fell nearby and did not detonate.

The story perfectly illustrates the difficulties of evacuating damaged equipment from the LBS. In particular, in the summer, Ukrainian formations could lose several scarce ARVs at once while removing just one tank. For the same reason, the Russian Armed Forces in the summer failed to rescue abandoned Leopard 2 and Bradley from the no-man's land in the Zaporozhye direction. Now the captured American equipment will go for study, and someday it will end up on display at a famous museum in the Moscow region. Where any visitor can see it.


At the Vremyevsky site, it was reported that the Russian zone of control was expanding north of Priyutnoye. In general, relative calm remains in the area, in contrast to a number of other areas. Despite this, periodic local clashes occur between the RF Armed Forces and the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

In the Orekhovsky sector, for the second day in a row, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been making unsuccessful attempts to advance north of Verbovoy . At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces were fighting in the Rabotino area .

Image
In the Kherson direction in Krynki , Ukrainian assault groups several times tried to expand the zone of control south of the so-called “greenhouses”. And to the southeast, units of the 38th Marine Brigade began to equip fortified strongholds. But in the last few days, Russian troops have been actively practicing positions in the forest and in Krynki itself. Both aerial bombs and artillery shells were used, which drove the Ukrainian Armed Forces back to the starting point with losses.

However, the situation actually remains the same. The command of the Ukrainian group "Katran" is transferring exactly as many assault groups as required to hold previously occupied positions. At the same time, in the central part of Krynki there is an increase in the number of advanced groups of the 38th brigade, as well as 505 separate battalions of the 37th brigade. They occupy private houses and set up shelters.

Given the nature of the terrain, all this activity may also be a diversionary action that will allow Russian units to be kept in the area while another strike is planned somewhere else. For example, from Ochakov’s side , as the Multi_XAM channel notes .

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
The uneasy situation in the border regions continued. In the Bryansk region, the settlement of Suzemka came under enemy fire .

Image
Ukrainian formations continued to shell settlements in the Belgorod region . The village of Vyazovoe , Krasnoyaruzhsky district , was shelled several times during the day . The village of Kozinka , Grayvoronsky urban district, was also under fire . In addition, Russian air defense systems intercepted an air target in the Belgorod region . There were no casualties.

Image
Today, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have not limited themselves to terrorist attacks on Russian territory. Apparently, celebrating their professional holiday, the Ukrainian formations decided to do the usual thing - artillery terror of the civilian population of the Donetsk People's Republic . For this purpose, the enemy used almost all available types of weapons, from conventional cannon artillery to MLRS, UAVs, etc.

The capital of the republic took the main blow. Arrivals were recorded in Budennovsky , Voroshilovsky , Kuibyshevsky , Kirovsky and Petrovsky districts . In the Kirov region, explosive objects were dropped from UAVs several times during the day. The result: seven people were injured. In the Budenovsky district, as a result of the attack, tanks with bitumen caught fire. Emergency Situations Ministry employees who arrived to carry out their official duty came under repeated fire: unfortunately, two firefighters were killed and 13 more people were injured.

In addition, neighboring Makeyevka and Gorlovka were shelled . A total of ten people were injured in these settlements. Also under fire were Volnovakha and Donetskoye , where two more civilians were killed. The result of today’s “AFU holiday” was the death of four people, as well as injuries of varying degrees of severity to another 30 civilians of the DPR.

Image
In addition, the enemy continued to shell the left bank of the Kherson region . Arrivals were reported in the following settlements: Aleshki , Dnepryany , Kakhovka , Korsunka , Novaya Kakhovka and Proletarka . In turn, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported the interception of air targets in Radensk and Saga .

Political events

“The Way Home”: how Navalnists play on the feelings of relatives of mobilized Russians

For a month now, scandals related to the “ Way Home ” telegram channel , which allegedly unites relatives of mobilized Russian military personnel, have not subsided. Recently, the messenger administration labeled it FAKE, which did not prevent the organizers from continuing their activities. At the same time, this became an excellent help for the next project of the Navalnists to remain in the news.

Why “The Way Home” has become a reason for discussions that have been going on for a month, we will tell you in our material .

About another unpleasant fact of the Navalnist structure “The Way Home”

The opposition project “ The Way Home ,” in addition to inducing impressionable relatives of those mobilized to illegal actions, also mimics an adequate, volunteer and quite patriotic organization with the same name.

The main direction of the ANO “Center for the Promotion of Voluntary Resettlement “THE WAY HOME” is to help everyone abroad to move to the Russian Federation. And this, as you understand, does not look very good in reports to Western curators, whose goal is to convince everyone around how terrible Russia is and no one wants to live there.

Now, an officially registered organization is literally being harassed because of its name, which is similar to a sabotage channel. Some time ago, the Telegram administration removed the link to the official chat of the ANO “The Way Home” from free access.

Moreover, if quite little was known about the activities of the patriotic organization and clearly not enough was done in its PR , then the same cannot be said about the Navalnists’ project, of course. Therefore, they have literally seized the information agenda, as well as the name, and are using the situation not only to spread their sabotage ideas, but also complicate the work of those who are dealing with the really important issue of repatriation in difficult times .

On the ongoing farmer protests in Moldova

Farmers continue to protest in Moldova . Yesterday, a column of agricultural machinery practically paralyzed traffic in the center of Chisinau; farmers also blocked roads around government buildings. A skirmish broke out between the protesters and the police over bags of manure that farmers wanted to leave at the presidency in protest against ignoring the problems of agriculture.

Moldovan farmers have been protesting since May, demanding help from the authorities amid a crisis caused, among other things, by the uncontrolled export of Ukrainian products through the country. The authorities also refuse to introduce a moratorium on the bankruptcy of farmers. The Association “ Power of Farmers ” is confident that the authorities are heading towards the destruction of national agriculture, and the lands of bankrupt farms will be transferred to large foreign corporations.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

IT ARMY OF UKRAINE: How U.S. Intelligence Agencies Have Elevated Cybercrime in Ukraine into a Freedom-Fighting Cult
By Valeriy Krylko - December 5, 2023 0

Image
[Source: hindustantimes.com]

As we know, freedom ends where the freedom of another begins. That is why today, more than ever before, everyone simply needs to develop within themselves a self-control tuning fork—an analytical tool that allows them to evaluate what is happening in a sensible way. The battle for minds and souls is in full swing. This means that the truth often becomes an idea that can infect us. And here the main thing is not to miss the moment when the tantalizing, sweet word “freedom” becomes permissiveness and begins to sweep away social institutions and legal norms on its way.

I will not surprise anyone if I say that Ukrainian hackers use defacement (posting materials of a provocative and demoralizing nature), phishing, malware distribution and Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks. In addition, doxxing—the search for and publication of personal or confidential information—was actively used at the initial stages. In one way or another, information in the media about this for the past two years has been passed more than once and more than twice, because it is the information that Ukrainian propagandists pass off as victories at the front, and therefore not only do not hide, but PR on all available resources. The aim, of course, is to get into the Western media (as, for example, here).

Why are the terrible war crimes against humanity and no less dangerous cybercrimes in Ukraine not perceived as something outside the legal framework? Because the war will wipe everything out and the goals are “good”—to punish an aggressive common enemy…or maybe because someone authorized it? Unspoken. Gave them complete freedom of action. There is enough evidence of threats from the Ukrainian leadership to send their hacker activists to Russia on the Internet.[1] They are not shy anymore. But it was not always like this.

“IT ARMY OF UKRAINE”—perhaps the most numerous hacker group, according to the legend that was thrown into the media right after the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict was created as a volunteer movement funded by entrepreneur Egor Aushev. But this information is for lazy philistines. Reality, as always, is a little more complicated and interesting.

Image
[Source: itarmyofukraine].

Within the NATO bloc, the Cyber Defense Systems Development Fund and the Armed Forces of Ukraine Command, Control and Communications Systems Modernization Fund were among the trust funds established to assist Ukraine in 2014.

According to information announced in April 2017 by the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), Vasyl Hrytsak, the first stage of cooperation with the Ukraine-NATO Trust Fund in the field of cyber defense included a total of one million euros, which was used to purchase equipment and software to equip computer incident response centers of key Ukrainian state institutions, in particular, the Situation Center of the SBU and the Cyber Incident Response Center of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.[2]

Image
[Source: belvpo.com]

Image
[Source: zhzh.com.ua]

However, the main support of the Ukrainian hack-movement is provided by the United States under its own government programs. This is not yet outside the legal framework but, you must agree, it is on the verge. Just imagine an American who has tracked where his taxes have gone…

The largest programs are those implemented through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which provided $10 million[3] in support of Ukraine’s information systems security and cyberattack prevention and response capabilities between 2014 and 2017. In March 2020 USAID announced $38 million in funding for a new project to ensure cybersecurity of critical infrastructure in Ukraine.

That’s not all. The AFU cybersecurity units have been participating in NATO’s multinational exercise Coalition Warrior Interoperability Exercise—CWIX—since 2018. As noted by Vladimir Rapko, head of the Main Directorate of Communications and Information Systems of the AFU General Staff, the exercise immediately “received high positive evaluations from partners.” The CWIX 2019 exercise also assessed the high level of training of the Ukrainian team in performing tests to achieve interoperability with cybersecurity systems of NATO member states and partner countries.[4]

Image
[Source: mscoe.org]

As you can see, no one has ever been particularly secretive since 2014 (just like with the supply of weapons for terrorist attacks on Russian territory and the bombing of civilians in Donbas). In February 2018, for example, the U.S. Senate quite openly approved the Cybersecurity Cooperation with Ukraine Act, which provides for assistance to Ukraine in strengthening its cybersecurity capabilities, including improving its ability to respond “to Russian-backed disinformation and propaganda efforts in cyberspace, including through social media.” Well, that already sounds like hacking, doesn’t it? And the main thing is that the defenders against cyber threats turn into attacking units at the wave of a hand, because the best defense is offense…

You might say: But this may have nothing to do with the mass “IT ARMY OF UKRAINE.” And you would be right but only partially, because by the time Egor Aushev published[5] his appeal to all those who are not indifferent to become cyber-volunteers to protect the virtual space of Ukraine, the U.S. plans in this regard had taken a different shape. Let’s say, more economical. On the principle of “Wikipedia,” where articles that should not diverge from U.S. policy are written by ordinary citizens (freedom of speech, or not?), new mass cyberdruzhiny are now being recruited. Why keep people on the payroll who, moreover, have to be trained for a long and expensive time, when you can launch “cyber infantry” for an idea almost free of charge.

Image
Egor Aushev [Source: businessinsider.com]

And here comes the moment when the feeling of permissiveness comes, because Ukrainians realize that they can violate their own and international laws whenever and wherever they want. The project “IT ARMY OF UKRAINE” was quickly supported by the Ministry of Digital Affairs and the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, the announcement about “recruitment of cyber volunteers” appeared on Twitter and on hacker forums, and candidates were asked to fill out a questionnaire on the service “GoogleDocs” (usually the company “Google” prohibits the use of its products for illegal actions—but this is different). Soon about a thousand people from 150 countries signed up for the “IT ARMY OF UKRAINE.”

Let us now turn to the moment the “IT ARMY OF UKRAINE” was created: On March 2, 2021, one of Egor Aushev’s companies—“Hacken.io”—launched the project “DisBalancer.” This company is registered in Estonia, in the Tallinn area. There, in the capital of the Baltic republic, is located the “NATO Command Center for Countering Cyber Threats”—in fact, a unit of combat hackers, operating under a legal roof. It is difficult to believe that Aushev’s team did not interact with this institution.

Image
[Source: disbalancer.com]

The “DisBalancer” project has launched software designed to attack information resources of the Russian Federation using the same “collective principle”: You install the program on your device, press a button, and the generation of “garbage requests” for DDoS attacks begins. The more participants, the better the result.

Image
[Source: disBalancer_Official]

Image
[Source: disbalancer.com]

Image
[Source: disBalancer_Official]

Image
[Source: itarmyofukraine]

A large American cryptocurrency service—Boxmining—posted a video urging its subscribers on YouTube to install an application from the DisBalancer project to participate in DDoS attacks on Russian websites.

Image

However, the cooperation between Boxmining and Egor Aushev started long before that: The Americans visited the Kyiv branch of hacken.io in 2020, and in 2021 interviewed its CEO, Dmitry Budorin, for their blog.

Image
Dmitry Budorin [Source: mc.today]

Needless to say, this entire American crypto-hack crowd is overseen by the U.S. National Security Agency, and some of its members have served or are serving in the Pentagon’s Cyber Command.

As we can see, freedom is perceived by the “progressive world” as a means to achieve their selfish political goals. In their opinion, all means are good for its achievement, especially since, in the case of a fair trial, one can simply deny involvement, showing the fight against troublemakers on one’s own behalf.


1.https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/04/11/ru ... s-it-army/

2.https://interfax.com.ua/news/general/433693.html

3.https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine ... e-attacks/

4.https://russiancouncil.ru/cyberukraine- ... v179606869

5.www.businessinsider.com/i-created-ukrai ... cks-2023-2

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/1 ... ting-cult/

******

U.S. Is Withholding Aid To Push Ukraine Towards Negotiations With Russia

Yesterday, at 9:46 local time, Strana published (machine translation):

Volodymyr Zelensky to address US senators via video link today - The Washington Post

Today, President Volodymyr Zelensky will address US senators via video link with a request to approve financial assistance to Ukraine. ...


Twelve hours later, at 21:43 local time, this piece came out:

"Something's happened." Zelensky canceled his speech to US senators at the last moment

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky canceled his speech to lawmakers scheduled for today at the last moment. This was announced by the head of the Democratic majority in the US Senate, Chuck Schumer.

"By the way, Zelensky was not able to join our briefing at 15:00 (22:00 Kiev time) – something happened at the last minute," Schumer said.


Well, yes, something had happened:

Ukraine Aid Falters in Senate as Republicans Insist on Border Restrictions

President Biden’s urgent push to replenish Ukraine’s war chest and send aid to Israel is on the brink of collapse in the Senate, where Republicans are prepared on Wednesday to block the funding unless Democrats agree to add strict measures to clamp down on migration at the U.S. border with Mexico.
A classified briefing with administration officials called to shore up support devolved into a partisan screaming match on Tuesday afternoon, with Republicans angrily accusing Democrats of trying to steamroller over their demands for a border crackdown.


It would have been easy for the Democrats to commit a few billions for border security. But Biden wants to end the war in Ukraine. Starving it of money is the easiest way to push it towards negotiations.

All this was planned by the Pentagon think tank RAND which, early this year, published a study about how to end the war in Ukraine:

Avoiding a Long War - U.S. Policy and the Trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

(A 2019 study by RAND, Extending Russia - Competing from Advantageous Ground, had recommended to openly arm Ukraine to keep Russia busy. It has been the basis of U.S. Ukraine policy ever since.)


But in early 2023 RAND had turned a corner and argued that a prolonged war in Ukraine will be too costly for the U.S. to sustain:

Image

The biggest Ukraine problem the White House currently has is President Vladimir Zelenski who has rejected any and all negotiations with Russia.

The RAND study had foreseen such a situation and had found ways to push Ukraine towards talks with Russia:

[T]he United States could decide to condition future military aid on a Ukrainian commitment to negotiations. Setting conditions on aid to Ukraine would address a primary source of Kyiv's optimism that may be prolonging the war: a belief that Western aid will continue indefinitely or grow in quality and quantity. At the same time, the United States could also promise more aid for the postwar period to address Ukraine's fears about the durability of peace. Washington has done so in other cases, ...
...
Linking aid to Ukrainian willingness to negotiate has been anathema in Western policy discussions and for good reason: Ukraine is defending itself against unprovoked Russian aggression. However, the U.S. calculus may change as the costs and risks of the war mount. And the use of this U.S. lever can be calibrated. For example, the United States could level off aid, not dramatically reduce it, if Ukraine does not negotiate. And, again, a decision to level off wartime support pending negotiations can be made in tandem with promises about postwar sustained increases in assistance over the long term.


That was a nice plan. But how well the aid lever can be calibrated depends of course on Congress, not on the president's say so.

There are also downsides to withholding or giving aid promises:

Clarifying the future of U.S. aid to Ukraine could create perverse incentives depending on how the policy is implemented. Committing to increased wartime assistance to Ukraine to reduce Russian optimism could embolden the Ukrainians to obstruct negotiations, blame failure on Moscow, and gain more Western support. Announcing a decrease or leveling off in assistance to Ukraine to reduce Kyiv's optimism about the war could lead Russia to see the move as a signal of waning U.S. support for Ukraine. If it took this view, Russia might keep fighting in the hope that the United States would give up on Ukraine entirely. Although recognizing that Ukraine is fighting a defensive war for survival and Russia an aggressive war of aggrandizement, the United States would nonetheless have to carefully and dispassionately monitor events and target its efforts to create the intended effect on whichever side's optimism is determined to be the key impediment to starting talks.

This would probably have been a good way to go if Biden had control over dispensing or withholding funds to Kiev. But the Republicans as well as the Democrats, likely in consent with the White House, have so far blocked all further aid.

There current path then seems to be a different one towards negotiations with Russia - regime change in Kiev.

President Zelenski is unwilling to take up peace talks. If he can be pushed out of office during the next few months his likely replacement, General Zaluzny, will probably be more inclined to seek an end of the war.

Thus the current tactic is to pressure Zelenski into leaving by withholding all future funds. If another Ukrainian leader comes in, aid might again flow to prevent a total takeover of the country by Russia.

Still - the aid calibration would be a problem. So may be giving up and leave, as Biden did in Afghanistan, might be the preferred option.

Posted by b on December 6, 2023 at 11:32 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/12/u ... .html#more

I do not see Russia seriously coming to the table unless all the war aims are met, one way or another.

******

(This is a bit dated due too the cancelation of the video conference. Nonetheless, some interesting analysis.)

DECEMBER 5, 2023 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Ukraine war is undergoing mutation

Image

Ukrainian officials claim to have blown up railway connections linking Russia to China in a strike deep into enemy territory
The Ukraine President Vladimir Zelensky’s video conference with the US senators on Tuesday is expected to be a turning point in the Ukraine war for three reasons. First, the Biden Administration has not written him off completely, and, more important, is not playing favourites in the game of thrones in Kiev. Second, Biden Administration hasn’t given up hopes that all is lost in the war. Third, most important, the US is signalling to Europeans that it is not thinking of cutting loose and exiting Eurasia, a la Afghanistan.

There is no question that the classified briefing Zelensky will give the lawmakers in Washington is a do-or-die attempt by the Biden Administration to persuade them that any cut-off in aid will have far-reaching consequences. The senate voting can also be fateful for Biden’s dwindling chances of securing a second term in the 2024 election.

Zelensky’s own political future will be crucially affected by the decision taken by the US senate tomorrow apropos the Administration’s $60 bn in additional aid for Ukraine. To be sure, the White House is straining every nerve.

Shalanda Young, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote in a letter Monday to congressional leaders: “I want to be clear: without congressional action, by the end of the year we will run out of resources to procure more weapons and equipment for Ukraine and to provide equipment from US military stocks. There is no magical pot of funding available to meet this moment. We are out of money – and nearly out of time.”

Young held out a stark warning that the loss of US financial support would “kneecap Ukraine on the battlefield, not only putting at risk the gains Ukraine has made, but increasing the likelihood of Russian military victories”.

She held out the grim prognosis that a Russian victory could cause the war to spill over into a broader regional conflict involving the US’ European allies. That may seem an exaggeration, as Russia has shown no signs of waging a continental war, but if Ukraine collapses, there is going to be a scramble by its western neighbours who have territorial claims on the country — the burdens of history.

Equally, the fate of the Biden candidacy will be sealed by the vicissitudes of the Gaza war rather than Ukraine war but that said, bad tidings from the war front can possibly augment the case for a new leadership in the White House. Simply put, everything adds up in Biden’s contestation with Donald Trump.

Can American money make a difference to Ukraine’s depleted manpower? But no American money means no war. The European Union carries hardly any credibility as a replacement. Ten days from now, European leaders are holding a summit meeting (December 14-15) where “continued EU support for Ukraine and its people” is listed as the top agenda item.

The big question at the forthcoming summit is whether Hungary’s hostility will boil over as EU leaders deliberate on a historic decision to bring Ukraine into the group as well as to formalise a key budget deal to throw a €50 billion lifeline to Kiev. Prime Minister Viktor Orban is demanding that the whole process should be put on ice until leaders agree to a wholesale review of EU support for Kiev.

The point is, in principle, Orban can hold the bloc hostage as it is supposed to act unanimously on big strategic decisions. To compound matters, Orban is striking when Ukraine fatigue is going up in public opinion in many EU countries. There are straws in the wind — the winner of the recent Dutch election Geert Wilders is vehemently anti-EU. Looking ahead, with a couple of more far-right leaders in Europe surging and a potential return of Trump, the EU’s mien won’t be the same again.

Much harder to predict is the state of play in Kiev. Ukraine is notionally heading for polls in March 2024, as mandated by the constitution. But in early November, the US Department of State spokesman said that the Ukrainian constitution allowed the country to cancel elections. Subsequently, the parliament in Kiev agreed that elections should be put off for as long as martial law remains in effect, plus for an additional six months after it is lifted.

Behind the scenes, though, a simmering power struggle between Zelensky and his top military commander Gen. Valery Zaluzhny has burst into public view. Zelensky’s popularity has recently fallen below 65 percent and reports keep appearing that many army commanders do not see eye-to-eye with the tactics framed by President Zelensky.

Zaluzhny’s assertion in an interview with the Economist magazine recently that the war is deadlocked drew a public rebuke from Zelensky who has been clipping the charismatic general’s wings — the latest being the replacement of one of Zluzhny’s deputies, the head of special operations forces Gen. Viktor Khorenko.

According to the New York Times, “Speculation about tension between the president and the military’s commanding general over strategy and command appointments had been swirling in Kyiv for more than a year … US military officers who have worked with General Khorenko were surprised by the news of his ouster and described a close and effective working relationship with him, according to American military officials… The firing appeared to undercut General Zaluzhny’s authority.” (here)

And all this, interestingly, coincides with a sensational piece by the well-known journalist Seymour Hersh in the weekend that “everyone in Europe is talking about” the secret peace talks going on between Zaluzhny and Gen. Valery Gerasimov who runs the war for the Kremlin. Notably, Tass news agency reported on Hersh’s disclosure, which burnished its credibility — although the story bears the hallmark of an information war that is probably intended to complicate life for Zaluzhny.

Meanwhile, a riveting long read in the Washington Post on Monday in the nature of a post-mortem on the catastrophic failure of Ukraine’s much-vaunted “counteroffensive” against Russian forces, which has implied that Zaluzhny’s rejection of the Western military doctrine proposing a concentrated push toward a singular objective of reaching the Azov Sea coastline and his preference instead to make the formidable length of the 600-mile front a problem for Russia, ultimately diminished the firepower of Ukraine’s military at any single point of attack and diluted its fighting power, while the Russian defences that followed textbook Soviet standards held firm.

How the WaPo narrative dovetails into the power struggle in Kiev remains to be seen. As things stand, the advantage goes to Zelensky and all indications are that Biden considers him a safe bet through the crucial 2024 period ahead while his own re-election bid accelerates.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/ukraine ... -mutation/

That WP analysis of the 'counter offensives' failure was spot on, a failure I noticed early on. Liddell-Hart warned against the deployment of mechanized forces in "pinch-penny packets", which is exactly what Ukraine did. Not a slam dunk by any means but the only possibility of accomplishing their goals.

I notice that the Uke claim of a deep rail strike is not even commented on....
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:56 pm

Decrease in commitment
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/08/2023

Image

Despite Joe Biden's appearance to beg the Republican Party to approve the financing that his executive has requested from Congress, not a single one of his representatives favored the measure, which is why financing for Ukraine and Israel remains blocked. The Democratic Party has a majority of 51, but requires the affirmative vote of nine Republicans to reach the 60 votes required for the measure. In an election year and with the ability to delay the process to use it for their own benefit, the difficulties go back months and are beginning to be a major concern for both kyiv and Washington and Brussels. It is not only about the possibility of the loss of US assistance, which it is to be hoped that, despite the delays and opportunistic Republican political demands, will be finally approved, but also about covering the gaps in the time that the US contribution is delayed.

The Kiel Institute for the World Economy's monitoring of military, financial and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine from different countries shows that Kiev depends on two major donors: the English-speaking countries, that is, the United States and the Kingdom United, and the bloc made up of the 27 member countries of the European Union. As the data shows and as Brussels also boasted, in July 2023, the EU overtook the United States as the largest donor. The fundamental difference between American and European commitments is that, while the latter are planned for the long term (multi-year according to tracking ), all of the American promises are short-term. The absence or radical reduction of new American promises thus represents a critical situation for kyiv and an added problem for Brussels, which has to compensate for this loss by paying for Washington.

The data provided yesterday by the Kiel Institute clearly shows the trend that has occurred over the last year. “The dynamics of support for Ukraine have decreased,” states the statement presenting the latest analyses, which goes on to explain that “the new aid committed has reached its lowest level between August and October 2023, a drop of practically 90 % compared to the same period in 2022.” The graph presented leaves no room for doubt.

Image

The media coverage of the data, and also the original statement from the Kiel Institute, focus on the uncertainty that the decline in new commitments represents for Kiev, which has meant that Ukraine is fundamentally dependent on four donors: the United States, Germany, the Nordic countries and the countries of Eastern Europe. That list offers few surprises. As the main military and military-industrial power, it is evident that it is the United States that has led the way in deliveries of weapons and ammunition to Ukraine. Despite its initial reluctance and the media, political and diplomatic pressure to which Olaf Scholz was subjected in the first months of the Western war effort, Germany decided at the beginning of 2023 to increase its commitment to war and, since the sending of Leopard tanks, has been one of the countries that has most harshly defended the military route as the only possible solution to the conflict. The Pistorius-Baerbock tandem in Defense and Foreign Affairs respectively have given Berlin the military centrality that it has lost economically and politically in the European Union. Nor is the role of the Nordic countries, which, like Sweden and Finland, try to show their desire to participate in NATO by increasing their contribution to the common war, surprising. Even less so is the importance of the Eastern European countries, former members of the Warsaw Pact, which have provided Ukraine with their material of Soviet or Russian origin, generally in exchange for promises that it will be replaced in the form of NATO equipment. .

These four actors, who have become key in the current situation due to their specific situation, also have different limitations. In the case of the United States, its industrial power would allow it to provide Ukraine with the material requested by kyiv, although President Joe Biden lacks the necessary votes to approve the amounts of funds that he demands. Hence, in six months he went from stating that “Putin has already lost the war” to appealing to the most emotional argument to claim that “we cannot allow Putin to win.”

In the case of Germany, despite having announced that it will double its assistance, Berlin's position is not as clear as kyiv would like. In a live interview, Boris Pistorius, Minister of Defense, stated that “we are doing what we can. The same can be said of the other partners and allies. But Germany is not an ally of Ukraine and is therefore not part of any alliance.” The shadow of the possibility of being abandoned to its fate by the countries it considers its allies has begun to appear in Ukraine and these types of statements do not contribute to increasing the credibility of Zelensky, Ermak or Umerov, who continue trying to maintain the discourse that everything is going according to plan .

The role of the Nordic and Eastern European countries, which has been relevant while the contribution of other allies has decreased, also has a clear limit: industrial power in the first case and the disappearance of the Soviet stock, already sent to war, in the case of Ukraine's neighboring countries. The weight of military assistance from the members of the former Warsaw Pact is also a reminder of how kyiv and its partners have prepared the 2023 offensive. Although Ukraine has always demanded Western material and it is that equipment that it has obtained Much of the media spotlight, an important part of the material received by Kiev has been precisely that of Russian or Soviet origin, more compatible with its doctrine and without requiring specific instruction. Hence, countries like Slovakia have done what Ukraine has not yet gotten the United States to do: send aviation.

The data published yesterday also has three aspects of interest that are being ignored by practically the entire press. First of all, the expectations factor is being overlooked when analyzing the data. The decrease in new military commitments by countries like the United States coincides with the launch of the Ukrainian counteroffensive which, after several delays, began the first week of June. At that time, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that Ukraine already had everything it needed to defeat Russia. The lack of realism in the plan, which, as media outlets such as The Washington Post now admit , failed in the first 24 hours, together with the electoral factor, which makes the Republicans a tougher opposition, has meant that the lack of new US assistance poses a serious concern for Kiev and Brussels.

Aid commitment data suggests that Ukraine requires approximately €20 billion per month to maintain its war effort. The peaks of aid commitments occurred in December 2022 and June 2023. In the latter case, this is multi-year, that is, long-term assistance provided by the European Union, since each US commitment occurs in the short term . By that time, the big American announcements of future commitments had already disappeared. The consequence is the second of the factors that are being ignored in the analysis of the data: the lack of anticipation of a failure of the counteroffensive has meant that Ukraine has had to survive on EU assistance. The spending pattern indicates that those funds committed last June are probably exhausted even before they are all in kyiv's hands, further compromising Ukraine's economic situation.

The sum of both factors leads to a third aspect: the uncertainty about the delay of US funds at a time when Ukraine is on the defensive against a Russia that could increase its attacks in relevant areas of the front forces the Union European Union to increase its commitment to war. Despite the fear that exists in kyiv about the possibility of pressure from its allies in search of a negotiation, war continues to be, for the moment, the path also chosen by Brussels. This is how Emmanuel Macron's insistence on receiving Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian president so repeatedly criticized by his European counterparts, on an official visit to the Elysee must be understood. The French president's objective is clear: achieve Orbán's promise not to veto the aid package that the European Union intends to approve for Ukraine, 50 billion euros with which to compensate for the drop in American assistance. With this, the EU aims to buy time and give Kiev a few more months of margin to achieve the positive result that billions and months of preparation have not achieved.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/08/28708/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 7
December 8, 2023
Rybar

Image

Fierce fighting continues in the Soledar direction . To the northwest, by the end of the week, Russian paratroopers were able to make significant advances from the Berkhovskoye Reservoir . An important stronghold of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, equipped in the Valyanovsky nursery , came under the control of the RF Armed Forces .

And that’s not all - Russian troops reached the outskirts of Bogdanovka , and south of Khromovo the Bakhmutsky Shlyakh autodrome was cleared . Thus, the RF Armed Forces managed to level the entire front line in this area. At the same time, the enemy suffered significant losses in both manpower and equipment. And this is not even counting the problems with lack of supplies and desertion.

In addition, there is reason to believe that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are preparing for the second stage of offensive operations in the Kherson direction . Enemy movements are observed in the direction of the Kinburn Peninsula - Golaya Pristan , where Ukrainian artillery has been actively operating for several weeks. At the same time, Ukrainian marines still maintain control over the bridgehead in Krynki .

Meanwhile, in the Orekhovsky sector, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been trying for several days to advance near Verbovoy and west of Novofedorovka . Bad weather prevents active offensive operations in this area. At the same time, there is a local offensive in the Starobel direction. At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are attempting counterattacks in the areas of the Torsky ledge and Serebryansky forestry .

The situation on the front line and combat operations

The Russian Armed Forces continued to attack the port infrastructure of the Odessa region : Russian kamikaze drones attacked targets in the Danube ports of Kiliya , Izmail and Reni . In addition, the UAVs worked on objects in the Bolgrad region , from where information had previously been received about the use of this area to shelter delivered weapons and equipment, as well as to accommodate mercenaries. It was also reported about the work of “Geraniums” at the Starokonstantinov airfield in the Khmelnitsky region .


In the Kupyansky sector, the Russian Armed Forces fought near Sinkovka , while the Ukrainian Armed Forces made several attempts at counterattacks near Ivanovka , but were not successful. In addition, a few days earlier, information appeared about the destruction of one of the crossings across the Oskol River .

In the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector, the forces of the Russian Armed Forces continue to develop a local offensive. At the same time, several attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces were repelled in the area of ​​the Torsky ledge and near the Serebryansky forestry .


In the Soledar direction , the enemy’s position is getting worse every day: there are reports of mass cases of desertion in the ranks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces near Konstantinovka , and near Kleshcheevka , Ukrainian formations are suffering from a lack of medicine and ammunition. At the same time, the RF Armed Forces almost completely solved the problem of shell starvation in Kleshcheevka. At the same time, a positional struggle is underway near Vesely and Belogorovka , where Russian troops, after the recent assault on Ukrainian positions, are clearing out local oporniks. Significant successes were achieved at Bogdanovka , where Russian troops managed to take a large fortified area - the Valyanovsky nursery and reach the outskirts of the village. The Russian Armed Forces reached the outskirts of Berkhovka , and to the south of Khromovo the Bakhmutsky Shlyakh autodrome was cleared . To the south, near the village of Kirovo , several attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces were repelled.


In the Donetsk direction, Ukrainian troops made attempts to regain control of the western regions of Marinka . At the same time, in the Avdeevsky sector, the Russian Armed Forces continue the operation to encircle the fortified area. On the northern flank there were battles for forest belts near Keramik and Novokalinovo . To the west of the fortified area, pressure continued to be applied in the direction of Severny and Tonenkoye .


Positional battles continue in the Yuzhnodonetsk direction . Strikes were carried out against concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in Vodyanoy and Nikolskoye . The advance of the Russian Armed Forces in the Staromayorsky area was stopped due to bad weather. Artillery duels are taking place in the Priyutnoye area .


Positional battles continue in the Orekhovsky sector . The Russian Armed Forces have been repelling attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces for several days in a row in the area of ​​the village of Verbovoye and west of Novofedorovka . At the same time, Russian troops manage to successfully counterattack in these areas, but any advance is complicated by bad weather.


The @SolovievLive channel publishes footage of soldiers of the 71st Guards Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 42nd Motorized Rifle Division posing against the backdrop of another abandoned German Leopard 2A4 tank in the Zaporozhye direction. It is characteristic that blocks of the Soviet Kontakt-1 dynamic protection complex are installed on the turret and sides of the armored vehicle. The reason is the insufficient protection of tanks of this modification from fire from Russian anti-tank weapons, which became obvious back in the summer.

Whether the tank with the video will become the first captured Leopard will depend on whether it can be towed to the rear from no man's land. This task is not so simple and involves great risks, as can be seen in the recent evacuation of a captured Bradley near Avdiivka .

Image
In the Kherson direction in the vicinity of Krynki, Ukrainian units did not attempt to move deeper. All efforts of the advanced groups are concentrated on holding positions on the outskirts of the forest under attacks from the Russian Army. Similar activity of assault groups of the 36th Marine Brigade is noted on the edge of the controlled zone in a village in the west. Sappers laid mines on the approaches and also equipped firing points.

To the west, two assault detachments of the tactical group “Grom” were transferred on two boats to Alekseevsky Island , which, apparently, will rotate forces near the railway bridge. The cover of the watercraft was provided by the Bukovel electronic warfare team from Kherson .

More interesting in the context of the Kherson direction are the enemy’s movements in the direction of the Kinburn Peninsula - Golaya Pristan . There, for several weeks, the CAESAR self-propelled guns from the outskirts of Kutsurub and Ochakov have been unanswerably hitting Russian positions . In Ochakov itself , as well as in Koblevo , units of the Marine Corps and Special Operations Forces “South” have been stationed for a long time, testing communications equipment and UAVs. According to some reports, the AFU DRGs have already landed on the Kinburn Spit several times under the cover of artillery and UAVs from Pervomaisky Island .

The long absence of fire engagement in these areas creates conditions convenient for the enemy to accumulate resources and subsequently attack in this area. The terrain for crossing and landing is quite suitable. In addition, the coastal zone is convenient for storing small and unmanned boats, given the attention to Odessa and its lack of attention to the Dnieper-Bug estuary. And to the east of Ochakov, at least two Gepard anti-aircraft installations are located, covering this area from attacks by Geraniums.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas
Today, in the sky over the Voronezh region, a Ukrainian UAV was suppressed by electronic warfare equipment: there was no destruction or casualties.

Image
In addition, the enemy shelled the village of Elizavetovka, Glushkovsky district, Kursk region : 10 arrivals were recorded, two houses were damaged, there were no casualties.

Image
Today, the intensity of DPR shelling has decreased. Nevertheless, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continued to adhere to the old tactics - terror of the civilian population. Several districts of Donetsk and Gorlovka , as well as the Yasinovatsky district , came under enemy fire . In the Petrovsky district of Donetsk, Ukrainian UAVs again dropped an explosive object on civilians - two people were injured. And in neighboring Gorlovka, a 13-year-old child died as a result of flying into a residential building.

Image
The enemy continues to shell the left bank of the Kherson region . Today the following settlements were shelled: Aleshki , Dnepryany , Kakhovka , Korsunka , Novaya Kakhovka , Peschanovka and Proletarka . In addition, Gornostaevka and Cairo were under intense fire throughout the day . Ukrainian UAVs were also active in the area.

Political events
On the construction of a new corridor for the export of agricultural products from Ukraine

Colleagues report that the United States plans to allocate $225 million for the construction of a Euro-gauge railway 75 km from Lviv to the border with the European Union. The money will be directed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to create a double-track railway section that will connect Lviv with the EU transport system. It is noted that this construction will significantly expand the possibilities for exporting agricultural products from Ukraine.

About the new batch of Leopard 2A4 for Ukraine

The Warsaw Mermaid writes : A Leopard 2A4 for Ukraine arrived in Poland for servicing . The number of tanks is unknown, but it appears that only one was handed over. A photo of a Ukrainian tank was published on social networks, which was accepted for service in Gliwice at the Bumar Labędy plant after multiple hits in the turret during the battle. Exactly how many tanks arrived at the site, where a major overhaul of Ukrainian Leopard 2A4s has been carried out since July, has not been specified. But it is known that of the two publicly handed over, the Poles returned only one a few months later.

In total, the Armed Forces of Ukraine received 40 Leopard 2A4 tanks, and it is expected that another 14 will be delivered next year. The Poles are responsible for repairing the A4 version, while the A5 and A6 modifications are carried out by the German side. Anticipating questions about road blockades and other disputes between allies: business is business.

On the results of a closed meeting between representatives of the US and Ukrainian defense sectors

Yesterday, December 6, a closed conference was held in Washington , which was attended by American and Ukrainian government officials, as well as representatives of the defense sectors of the two countries. As a result, the parties signed an agreement to accelerate joint production of weapons, exchange of experience and data. At the same time, an important point of the event was a new list of Kyiv’s preferences in the weapons supplied to it. The Ukrainian leadership asked the United States:

– F-18 Hornet fighters ; – Apache and Blackhawk
helicopters ; – transport aircraft C-17 Globemaster and C-130 Super Hercules ; – three types of drones produced by General Atomics , including the MQ-9B Sky Guardian ; – THAAD missile defense systems .



Among other things, the list includes weapons and equipment already supplied to Ukraine, including Abrams tanks, 155-mm M777 howitzers, F-16 aircraft (currently 60 F-16s have been approved for delivery to Kiev), drones and longer-range ATACMS missiles. The White House administration, meanwhile, is not yet up to Ukraine’s growing appetites. Joe Biden's office first needs to resolve the issue of approving aid to Ukraine for 2024 - the bill is actively blocked by Republicans, demanding that Democrats tighten immigration policy.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

Zelensky-Zaluzhny Spat 'Tempest in a Teapot' Concealing Ukraine's True Masters
16:14 GMT 30.11.2023 (Updated: 16:36 GMT 30.11.2023)
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (left) and Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny (right). File photo. - Sputnik International, 1920, 30.11.2023

Image
© Photo : Ukrainian President's office

The Economist has fired off another salvo in the behind-the-scenes war for control of Ukraine, citing polling showing a slide in President Zelensky’s rating against General Zaluzhny. But neither of the men will be able to do much unless they have Ukraine’s little-talked about “grey cardinals” on their side, says IR scholar Gilbert Doctorow.

The UK’s leading business magazine has followed up on its bombshell interview with an op-ed by Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny, in which Ukraine’s top general undercut his boss’ optimistic appraisal of the state of the conflict with Russia by admitting that the summer counteroffensive had hit a “stalemate,” and that there would be no “deep and beautiful breakthrough” against Russia, regardless of what “NATO textbooks” say.
In a new piece published Tuesday, The Economist stressed that relations between Zelensky and Zaluzhny have reached a boiling point.

“The politicians are saying their generals are Soviet-trained twits. And the generals are saying the politicians are interfering twits. Victory has many fathers, but no one wants to parent a stalemate,” an unnamed Ukrainian ‘senior government source’ told the outlet.

Worse yet for Zelensky, the magazine pointed to recent internal polling of ordinary Ukrainians’ attitudes toward their leaders, showing that not only Zaluzhny, but even the chief of the military intelligence service, Kyrylo Budanov, have better favorability ratings than Zelensky (+70 percent and +45 percent compared to +32 percent, respectively).

The Zelensky-Zaluzhny spat has already had a visible impact on Kiev’s internal politics, with Zelensky’s sacking of Zaluzhny allies, the mysterious bomb explosion death of one of the commander’s key aides, and this week’s poisoning of Budanov’s wife pointing to signs of a fierce internal power struggle punctuated by outright mafia-style tactics.
Head of Ukraine's Military Intelligence Kyrylo Budanov. - Sputnik International, 1920, 30.11.2023

“The current conflict between military and political leadership was brought on by the failure of the Ukrainian ‘counteroffensive,’ which was launched on June 4 with great expectations both within Ukraine and especially among the United States and its European allies, who have been financing and supplying military supplies to Kiev,” Dr. Gilbert Doctorow, a veteran international relations expert and Russian affairs specialist, told Sputnik.

“The generally recognized result of that effort today has been the loss of 60,000 or more Ukrainian soldiers and officers killed with many more wounded, and [an army] no longer capable of fighting. The human resources of Ukraine to continue the fight are nearing exhaustion and no amount of further weapons deliveries from the West can save the situation. As for the stated objective of crushing Russian defenses and reaching the Sea of Azov, thereby cutting Russia’s ground supply route from Crimea to the front lines, well that achieved nothing other than death and destruction for the Ukrainians,” Doctorow said.

With the time now coming to “pay a price” for this disastrous state of affairs, the “blame game” between Zelensky and Zaluzhny is only logical, the observer suggested, given the president’s responsibility for setting the counteroffensive’s objectives, and even intervening personally with tactical and strategic decisions, with the attempt to hold on to Artemovsk/Bakhmut being a prime example.

The stakes in the game being played between Kiev’s civilian and military leadership could not be higher, Doctorow emphasized, pointing out that in this fierce competition for power, “the side which loses may face imprisonment or betrayal or worse.”

That said, the “rivalry” between Zelensky, Zaluzhny and notorious former Zelensky advisor Oleksii Arestovych for the political leadership of the country is all but “a tempest in a teapot as far as the country’s future is concerned,” Dr. Doctorow believes, suggesting that “the real and open question is what will become of the gang of neo-Nazis who have been the grey cardinals, the deciding forces behind the throne ever since they took control of the Maidan coup d’état in February 2014.”

Unless these thugs are arrested or otherwise removed from the political playing field, no one, not Zelensky nor whoever may replace him, will be able to negotiate a peace settlement with Russia, barring the total collapse of Ukraine’s military, the observer said.

Image
Veterans of the Azov volunteer battalion, who took part in the war with Russia-backed separatists on the East of Ukraine, salute during the mass rally called "No surrender" in Kiev. File photo.
© AFP 2023 / SERGEI SUPINSKY

There’s a precedent to Dr. Doctorow’s assessment. Shortly after his election in 2019 on a platform including putting an end to the bloodshed in Donbass, Zelensky signaled willingness to implement the Minsk peace deal, which would have ended the war launched by Kiev against the region in the spring of 2014 by offering the territories broad internal autonomy in exchange for Donbass’ peaceful reintegration into Ukraine. Zelensky relented after the ultranationalist “grey cardinals” mentioned by the observer organized mass protests in Kiev and threatened to overthrow the president unless he stopped any talk of a peace deal.

“The alternative scenario,” Doctorow said, “is that the United States decides to prevent collapse by sending its own troops into the battle against Russia.”

“But that is very unlikely given the unwillingness of Washington to see its own troops die in the conflict or to risk escalation to a nuclear war,” the observer summed up.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20231130/zelen ... 08061.html

********

Rada Member Goncharenko Is Right: “There Will Be No NATO” For Ukraine

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
DEC 7, 2023

Any unofficial peace deal will likely see Ukraine remaining under the bloc’s wing as a de facto protectorate, but no members have the wherewithal to risk a direct war with Russia over that country, ergo its formal exclusion from NATO.

Rada member Alexey Goncharenko lamented on Telegram earlier this week that “there will be no NATO” for Ukraine, adding that the US is allegedly so annoyed with the issue that Blinken was rumored to have told his European counterparts to stop bringing it up. In response to this development, he wrote that Zelensky is now focusing solely on EU membership. His dramatic post came as the conflict finally began winding down in parallel with the worsening of political tensions between Zelensky and his rivals.

Goncharenko’s claim shouldn’t be surprising, however, since the conspicuous omission of any mutual defense obligations from the EU’s reported draft security guarantees to Ukraine last month suggested that the issue is informally closed. This summer’s decision to remove Ukraine’s Membership Action Plan requirement during the NATO Summit was nothing but a distraction to divert attention away from America’s growing realization that NATO enlargement in this context is actually a threat to its interests.

Russia successfully defended itself from the Hybrid War that’s been waged against it by NATO and that bloc’s several dozen other partners from February 2022 onwards, in large part due to its massive advantage in the “race of logistics”/“war of attrition” as well as its robust economic foundations. These combined to doom summer’s counteroffensive, which the Washington Post published a two-part post-mortem about earlier this week that concluded that the whole thing was wracked by miscalculations.

The end result is that the West’s reserves are depleted, its entire military strategy was discredited, and there’s accordingly no longer any appetite to indefinitely fund this proxy war. To the contrary, the contours of an unofficial peace deal are beginning to emerge, particularly with regards to Ukraine’s relationship with NATO. It’ll remain under that bloc’s wing as a de facto protectorate, but no members have the wherewithal to risk a direct war with Russia over that country, ergo its exclusion from NATO.

This outcome will predictably cost Zelensky even more political support than he’s already started to lose over the past month to his long-running rival Zaluzhny after his top parliamentary ally Arakhamia recently admitted that formal military neutrality was almost agreed to in March 2022. The Ukrainian leader walked away from Russia’s pragmatic peace deal, however, after being assured of Western support ‘for as long as it takes’ if he kept fighting in pursuit of his country’s NATO membership ambitions.

It's now known that he was led by the nose in order to exploit Ukraine as their Hybrid War proxy for degrading Russia’s military capabilities, though the West’s grand strategic goal failed and it turns out that they’re now no longer interested in making good on their implied deal with that former Soviet Republic. Just like NATO lied to Russia that it wouldn’t expand eastward, so too did it ironically lie to Ukraine that it would indeed expand into that country, all in order to manipulate both nations for different ends.

An estimated several hundred thousand Ukrainian troops, many of them forcibly conscripted into their armed forces, died between spring 2022 and now. If the conflict freezes without Ukraine soon thereafter officially joining NATO, then it can be said that they literally died for nothing. Suffice to say, the public will be furious and certainly take their anger out on Zelensky whenever he finally decides to hold elections, or they might fully back one of his rivals’ power plays that could be attempted against him before then.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/rada-mem ... o-is-right

*******

Image

West sabotaged Ukraine peace deal with Russia, admit Zelensky official and Germany’s ex leader
By Ben Norton (Posted Dec 07, 2023)

Originally published: Geopolitical Economy Report on December 3, 2023 (more by Geopolitical Economy Report) |

The United States has played a key role in fueling the wars in both Israel-Palestine and Ukraine.

The U.S. government has sought to prevent peace in Gaza, vetoing resolutions in the UN Security Council that call for a ceasefire, while sending weapons to Israel to help it bomb densely populated civilian areas, contributing to the killing of more than 15,000 Palestinians, approximately 70% of whom are women and children.

Since 2022, Washington has done exactly the same in Ukraine, torpedoing peace proposals that Russia had supported.

This has been confirmed by numerous sources, including the former leader of Germany and a top Ukrainian official, as well as Israel’s ex prime minister.

Germany’s former leader says U.S. sabotaged Russia-Ukraine peace talks

This October, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder explained in an interview how he had tried to negotiate peace between Ukraine and Russia in 2022.

Ukraine’s overtly anti-Russian newspaper Ukrainska Pravda reported on his bombshell remarks.

Moscow had a concrete peace plan laid out, according to Schröder. It was based on five points: “Ukraine’s rejection of NATO membership, two official languages in Ukraine, Donbas autonomy, security guarantees for Ukraine, and negotiations on the status of Crimea”, Ukrainska Pravda wrote.

But the former German leader said the United States sabotaged the peace talks.

“The only people who could resolve the war over Ukraine are the Americans”, Schröder emphasized.

“During the peace talks in March 2022 in Istanbul with [Ukraine’s Defense Minister] Rustem Umierov, Ukrainians did not agree to peace because they were not allowed to. They had to coordinate everything they talked about with the Americans first”, he recalled.

“However, nothing eventually happened. My impression is that nothing could happen because everything else was decided in Washington. It was fatal”, Schröder added.

The former German head of state likewise warned that Russia will never accept NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia.

“Regardless of who is in power, there is a belief in Russia that the West wants to expand further with NATO, namely into the post-Soviet area. Keywords: Georgia and Ukraine. No one at the head of Russia will allow this to happen. This danger analysis may be emotional, but it is real for Russia. The West must understand this and compromise accordingly; otherwise, peace will be tough to achieve”, Schröder stressed, in the comments quoted by Ukrainska Pravda.


Top Ukrainian official says West opposed peace deal with Russia
The former German chancellor’s observations were further bolstered by the remarks of a top Ukrainian official.

In November, Davyd Arakhamia sat down for an interview with Ukraine’s TV channel 1+1. Arakhamia is the parliamentary faction leader of the political party of Ukraine’s Western-backed President Volydmyr Zelensky.

This interview was also reported on by Ukraine’s vehemently anti-Russian newspaper Ukrainska Pravda.

Arakhamia represented Ukraine in the peace talks with Russia in Türkiye in March 2022.

At those negotiations, Arakhamia admitted that Russia did indeed want peace, and neutrality “was the most important thing for them”.

“They [the Russians] were prepared to end the war if we agreed to—as Finland once did—neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO”, the top Ukrainian official said, according to a translation by Ukrainska Pravda.

“They really hoped almost to the last moment that they would force us to sign such an agreement so that we would take neutrality”, he added.

But Ukraine’s Western sponsors were adamantly opposed to the peace proposal.

“When we returned from Istanbul, [British Prime Minister] Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight”, Arakhamia recalled.


Israel’s ex PM says U.S. killed Ukraine peace deal

These important testimonies from Germany’s former leader and a top Ukrainian official both echo an admission made by Israel’s former prime minister.

Israel’s ex Prime Minister Naftali Bennett explained in a February 2023 interview how he had been a mediator between Ukraine and Russia the year before.

“Anything I did was coordinated down to the last detail with the U.S., Germany, and France”, Bennett said. And “there was a legitimate decision by the West to keep striking Putin”.

Referring to the NATO bloc’s response to the peace proposal, the interviewer asked, “So they blocked it?”

Bennett replied, “Basically, yes. They blocked it, and I thought they’re wrong".

https://mronline.org/2023/12/07/west-sa ... ex-leader/

******

A win-win situation for everyone
December 8, 11:37

Image

In attempts to convince Republicans to allocate money to Ukraine, increasingly miraculous revelations follow. Particularly from Blinken.

1. 90% of all American money allocated to Ukraine did not end up in Ukraine. Most of them remained in the USA.
2. This money was used to support military-industrial complex enterprises and create new jobs.
3. This ratio of expenses is a win-win for everyone, so it is necessary to allocate “more assistance for Ukraine.”

It’s not that this is some kind of secret, we’ll just note that they don’t really hide it anymore.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8814700.html

Google Translator

******

GROWING NUMBER OF UKRAINIANS WANT PEACE TALKS – POLL
DECEMBER 7, 2023 1 COMMENT

RT, 12/4/23

Ukrainians are almost evenly split on how to proceed in the conflict with Russia, local media reported on Sunday, citing a survey conducted in November by the Rating group.

According to the results of the poll, 44% of respondents said it was important to look for compromise in negotiations with Russia and that other countries should be brought into the process.

At the same time, 48% of those polled were opposed to any negotiations with Moscow, and insisted on continuing hostilities until Kiev retakes full control of the territories it has lost.

The results indicated a marked downturn in the number of Ukrainians who support prolonging the fighting with Moscow. In similar polls conducted in July and February, negotiations were backed by just 35% of respondents, while 60% were in favor of prolonging the conflict.

In the latest survey, a compromise was mostly supported by people between the ages of 18 and 35 from the eastern part of Ukraine. Most of those who supported continuing the fighting were between the ages of 36 and 50, and live in the western half of the country.

A similar poll cited by Bloomberg last month also suggested there was a “growing minority” of Ukrainians who believe territorial concessions to Russia are inevitable in exchange for peace.

The poll results come after Kiev’s much-touted summer counteroffensive failed to result in any meaningful territorial gains. According to the latest estimates reported by Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, as of early December, the campaign had cost Ukraine over 125,000 troops and more than 16,000 heavy weapons units.

Concerns have also increased in Kiev that financial and military support from its Western backers could soon dry up as they grow weary of the conflict and shift their focus towards the recent escalation between Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza.

Despite these factors, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has insisted Kiev will not accept any compromise with Russia and will continue fighting until it recaptures all the territories within its 1991 borders. He has also legally banned negotiations with Moscow while President Vladimir Putin remains in power.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov admitted last week that a ceasefire was unlikely in 2024, as Kiev and the US continue to push Zelensky’s peace formula as the only possible solution to the conflict.

The Ukrainian leader’s proposal involves Kiev reassuming control over its 1991 territories, while Moscow would be ordered to pay reparations and Russian officials would face a war crimes tribunal. Russia has repeatedly dismissed the proposal as being detached from reality.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2023/12/gro ... alks-poll/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Dec 09, 2023 12:56 pm

The return of politics
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/09/2023

Image

With February 24 as a starting point, Western discourse has always wanted to present a simplified vision of the Ukrainian conflict and its history. The lack of interest in the war that had broken out in 2014 and that was never resolved made the task easier for the Western political and media establishment , which condemned Russia en bloc and strictly followed each and every point made by the Ukrainian Government. The political authorities and the international press did not even have the need to exonerate their Kiev allies in their flagrant blocking of the Minsk process, the only peace talks that could have unraveled the resolution of, at least, that part of the conflict. The reasoning, argumentation and contextualization of the national, international, political, military and historical factors that had led to that moment were replaced by an ideology as simple as it was effective: the peaceful Ukraine, invaded by its eastern neighbor in its outburst of imperial ambitions, responded unitedly and in one voice, taking up arms against the aggressor.

In that story, both those men of military age who tried to flee the country so as not to have to fight in the war and, above all, the several million technically Ukrainian citizens residing in Donbass and Crimea, regions that for eight years have completely disappeared. lived on the fringes of kyiv or, in the case of Donetsk and Lugansk, actively fighting against their former capital. The simplification of the war until Zelensky became the image of Ukraine and a perfect representation of its population also implied disappearing all the political quarrels that had accompanied the president and that in part continued despite the apparent unity that the media saw. .

Zelensky's authoritarian tendencies, justified since February 24 by the international press hiding behind the military situation, not only precede the Russian invasion, but have continued their logical progression. The Ukrainian Government took advantage of the situation to, for example, outlaw a series of parties that had been uncomfortable. Zelensky not only outlawed the entire left - a part had been outlawed in Poroshenko's time - but he also used the war situation to put an end to all non-nationalist opposition still existing in the country, a ban accompanied by the centralization of information policy, a euphemism for imposing censorship. Zelensky has also repeatedly refused to hold elections while the war lasts, something that could be justified by the seriousness of the situation and by the legislation, which prohibits elections during times of martial law, but also has a dictat“No NATO” for Ukraine, Ukrainian Politician Says
Posted on December 9, 2023 by Yves Smith
Yves here. It’s noteworthy to see that divisions are developing over the question of NATO membership for Ukraine, of course assuming anything other than a small rump state with fantasies of retaking the territory that joins Russia (and what if other European countries gobble up bits as supposed charity?).

This is not as surprising as it may seem. One of the major Western fantasies for how to extract the US from Project Ukraine without having too much egg on its face is to somehow negotiate a ceasefire….when recall in March 2021, Russia kept prosecuting the war as it was negotiating. We did the same in the Vietnam peace talks. So any durable stop to the kinetic war is very likely to come at the end of, and not early in, negotiations. We still think any negotiated end to the war is vanishingly unlikely, for among other reasons that this is a war with the US and NATO, NATO cannot agree to any deal due to needing to have every state commit individually, which is na ga happen, and the Russian public would go berserk with any deal that did more than take a wee bit of sting out of a Ukraine capitulation.

But the tidbit below, on the US trying to get Ukraine to shut up on the topic of NATO, does point to the US recognizing the Ukraine cause is lost. The more any members with influence in the Collective West keep talking up Ukraine membership in NATO, an absolute red line for Russia. the more it will cement the Russian view that it must continue the war until Ukraine is prostrated and it can install a complaint government.

By Uriel Araujo, researcher with a focus on international and ethnic conflicts. Originally published at InfoBRICS


US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is pressuring European diplomats to cease any talks about Ukraine joining NATO, according to a member of Rada (the Ukrainian parliament), Oleksiy Goncharenko. This is no minor politician. The son of a former Odessa mayor, he is a member of the Ukrainian Permanent Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE). The allegations were publicly made in a series of texts posted in his Telegram channel (in Ukrainian). He wrote: “Unfortunately, there will be no NATO [for Ukraine]. Forget about it – it won’t happen.” Goncharenko claims that “several sources” in Washington told him the topic of Ukraine’s accession to the Atlantic Alliance “annoys the US elite” and even “after war” the country should not expect it.

The politician also commented on the ongoing friction between the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Valery Zaluzhny. According to Goncharenko, Washington is “not happy” about it. In addition, he says, one should expect the next aid package to Ukraine to be the last one: “In a year, at the end of 2024, we will not be given any more money… Most likely, we will switch to a credit form of cooperation. They’ll give a loan. Not a grant that won’t need to be repaid.”

Could such allegations be a fabrication created for propaganda purposes? There is no reason to think so and the logic of it in this case would be far from clear. In fact, Goncharenko’s claims make perfect sense in light of what we already know by now.

We know the US has been pressuring its ally to hold elections. Moreover, the US Mission to NATO last month posted on X (formerly Twitter) a vague message about Washington being “focused on setting the conditions for a just, durable, and sustainable peace” in Ukraine. We also know that European Union (EU) member states are divided over the bloc’s common budget, including additional funding for Kyiv in 2024.

In addition, Pulitzer winner journalist Seymour Hersh has written that, according to his American diplomacy and intelligence sources, the aforementioned General Valery Zaluzhny has been directly negotiating a peace deal with Russian general Valery Gerasimov, independently of Zelensky, who is described as a “wild card”. According to the journalist: “The two generals may continue to talk and Putin may indeed be interested in a settlement that gives him permanent control of Crimea and the four provinces he has claimed, but Zelensky remains the wild card. The American official said that Zelensky has been told that “this is a military-to-military problem to solve and the talks will go on with or without you.” If necessary, the American official told me, “We can finance his voyage to the Caribbean’.”

We know that the unprecedented sanctions against the Russian Federation have been backfiring since the beginning, with the Eurasian great power reaching record trade surplus as early as May 2022. That has sparked division within the European continent, and how de-industralized post-Nord Stream Europe has been hurt by the ongoing conflict and by American subsidy war.

As early as April 2023, as I wrote, former US ambassador to Finland, Earle Mack wrote that the US-led West had been “propping up Ukraine to fight a proxy war” but he could only see “a decade of death and chaos” for the country.

In May Zelensky was planning a number of bold actions against Russia, including bombing the Druzhba pipeline that provides Russian oil to Hungary (a NATO member), and even occupying Russian villages plus targeting the Russian Federation with long-range missiles. Such plans crossed some red lines and were a huge problem from the point of view of both the US and that of Ukraine’s neighbors.

That same month, aforementioned Serymour Hersh also reported that countries such as Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and the Czech Republic, led by Poland (with Germany playing some role in it too) had been pressuring the Ukrainian leader “to find a way to end the war, even by resigning himself if necessary, and to allow the process of rebuilding his nation to get under way.” According to Hersh’s CIA source at the time, these European leaders had “made it clear that ‘Zelensky can keep what he’s got – a villa in Italy and interests in offshore bank accounts – ‘if he works up a peace deal even if he’s got to be paid off, if it’s the only way to get a deal’.” Few months later, in September, Poland stopped sending Ukraine weapons, allegedly over a trade dispute, as bilateral relations deteriorated.

All of this points to a clear picture emerging, one that had been haunting Ukraine for a while: Western abandonment and betrayal – something of which Washington has a solid record. From an European perspective, the picture is even more dramatic: it is about the bloc’s own interests. As I wrote, in December 2021, American and European energy interests are far from converging and in fact the energy crisis in that part of the Old World is something that has benefited Washington, while hurting its European allies – and the same can be said about the American proxy attrition war in Eastern Europe. It is about time to admit NATO’s expansion has been a recipe for disaster and about time to admit Ukraine has a far-right problem and a problem with the way it deals with the Russian minority – and not just in Donbass. And all of that is a problem for Europe, too.

It remains to be seen how European leaders will conduct their policy pertaining to Ukraine and also to the strategic energy interests of the continent. One may expect many European voices urging the bloc to reconsider sanctions against Russia, for instance, as has been the case already. For a start, it could reconsider its stance on the issue of the rights of ethnic minorities.orial tone from whoever has taken over all the power in the country and wants to keep it.

This week, several international media echo the statements of Vitaly Klitschko, mayor of kyiv, and his harsh criticism of Volodymyr Zelensky's management in what they have described as the “return of politics.” The epic of the first months and the subsequent victories in Kharkiv and Kherson, which Ukraine promised to expand by expelling Russia from the southern territories in search of the moment when the blue and yellow flag would fly in Donetsk and Yalta, have given Zelensky a year and half of management without any opposition. The situation, the nationalist polarization that the war has necessarily created, and the complete and continuous management of communication tools managed to create, at least temporarily, a hero of the president dressed as a military man. That halo of invincibility has collapsed since the Ukrainian counteroffensive has not achieved a single one of its political objectives and the president and his entourage have once again been vulnerable to accusations from which until then they had been protected for media favor. In recent months, the issue of corruption has reappeared in the international press and the obvious differences that exist between the two heroes are currently being exploited in the pages of media as loyal to Ukraine as The Washington Post or The Economist : Volodymyr Zelensky , the civil power, and Valery Zaluzhny, the military power.

Klitschko's words, who accused the president of turning Ukraine into an autocracy similar to Russia, refer precisely to this different way of acting. The mayor of kyiv demands from the head of state something as simple as telling the truth, being sincere with a population that is suffering the effects of war, something that Klitschko has not done in the capital either. The speech that until a few days ago stated that everything is going according to plan, although perhaps with some delay it is no longer enough and the second row of the political class has clearly perceived Zelensky's weaknesses that they are now trying to exploit for their own benefit. Klitschko, whose management has also been harshly questioned for his inability to keep the infrastructure in good condition even before the war reached Kiev, defends Zaluzhny's position of admitting the stalemate in which the front finds itself instead of maintaining the optimistic discourse that the Office of the President has chosen for months despite being aware that the plan had failed.

The media's surprise at Klitschko's statements is limited to the acceptance that the impunity that the war had given Zelensky is over. Much harsher with the President's Office has been one of his former collaborators, Oleksiy Arestovich, who by criticizing the Ukrainian position in Istanbul, is positioning himself more clearly as an opposition. From the distance of someone who is aware that he will not have to be held accountable and that in the event of a change in the situation he will be able to quickly change his mind, Arestovich is the most important figure from Zelensky's entourage to defend the need to negotiate with Russia. That is his electoral position, in the same way that presenting himself as a defender of the population - despite having demonstrated that he is not capable of maintaining minimum services even in times of peace - is that of Klitschko or denouncing constant betrayals is that of Goncharenko, the former deputy of the Party of Regions and European Solidarity who walked around the House of Trade Unions in Odessa even before the burned bodies were removed and who is now trying to establish himself as a leader.

The lack of context when explaining the current war is also evident in this episode, in which the press has focused on the end of the political truce but has wanted to avoid going further. The confrontation between Zelensky and Klitschko is not due to the current situation, but rather dates back to 2019, when, as soon as he was elected, the new president launched a political offensive with which he unsuccessfully tried to remove the mayor of kyiv. The lack of interest in Ukrainian political realities before February 24, 2022 or simply the desire to protect Zelensky from accusations that his current authoritarianism is not due to Russian military intervention have prevented information about Klitschko's criticism from going beyond the headlines of the day.

Of all those names of possible candidates to overshadow the current president, it is Klitschko who has always worried Zelensky's team, possibly not because of his political ability, but because of his connections. The Office of the President saw a threat in him as he occupied a position too close to the seats of power and was, at the same time, a remnant of Poroshenko's presidency and a possible candidate to overshadow the new president. We must not forget that, despite his obvious political and rhetorical shortcomings, Klitschko has always had support that has made him rise beyond what his capabilities seemed to indicate. During the Maidan protests and that final phase in which external actors negotiated the composition of the future Ukrainian Government, Klitschko was the man closest to Frank-Walter Steinmeier, then German Foreign Minister. Perhaps that was the reason why, in the well-known telephone call intercepted and published, Victoria Nuland explicitly stated that Klitschko, Klitsch , should, like Oleh Tyahnibok, remain outside the Government that her boy Yatseniuk, Yats , should lead . Infighting has always been part of Maidan politics and the current confrontation between the mayor of Kiev and the president is nothing more than the revival, possibly temporary, since Zelensky has the media tools to silence Klitschko, of which has been the norm in recent years: a dynamic of opposing blocks but constantly reconfigured to create temporary allies and opportunistic enemies to use to achieve personal objectives. In that scenario, Zelensky and Klitschko play the same role.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/09/el-re ... -politica/

Google Translator

*******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 8
December 8, 2023
Rybar

Image

Russian troops are developing success in the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector: fighters are moving from Dibrova towards Terny and Yampolovka . In addition, fighting is taking place near Yar Laptev. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to counterattack from the southern flank of the Serebryansky forestry, but cannot achieve significant success. Nevertheless, the advance of the Russian Armed Forces in this direction will not be an easy walk due to the complexity of the terrain and the many fortifications erected by the enemy.

In the Soledar direction, Russian fighters finished clearing the fortified area near the Valnyanovsky nursery and the Bakhmutsky Shlyakh autodrome . Meanwhile, in the northwest of Bakhmut, the Russian Armed Forces are moving towards Grigorovka and Orekhovo-Vasilievka. In fact, the military managed to recapture most of the territories lost after the Wagner PMC left this area in the middle of the year.

Meanwhile, in the Avdeevsky fortified area, clashes continue in the area of ​​AKHZ , Stepovoy , towards Novokalinovo , Severny and Tonenky , but the configuration of the front has not changed significantly. Clashes are also taking place in the Orekhovsky sector; attempts continue to dislodge the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the bridgehead in Krynki in the Kherson direction.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

The Russian Armed Forces launched missile attacks on infrastructure facilities in Ukraine at night. An industrial enterprise in Pavlograd , presumably a local chemical plant, came under attack . In Kharkov , one of the missiles hit the building of the Kharkovoblenergo distribution point in the Shevchenkovsky district . Explosions also occurred in Kyiv, but the purpose of the attack is unknown. In addition, one of the thermal power plants in the front-line zone was hit: authorities note that this is at least the eighth strike in the last 2 months, the station received significant damage, three power units were disconnected from the network. Presumably, it was the Kurakhovskaya Thermal Power Plant .

Image
In the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector, there has been a noticeable activation of the front in the last week. The immediate task of the Russian troops is to eliminate the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ bridgehead on the eastern bank of the Zherebets River . Advancement from the northern flank from the Zhuravka gully is complicated by the nature of the terrain, so the offensive develops from Dibrova towards Terny and Yampolovka . The cleanup of the western part of the Broad Ravine continues , fighting is taking place on the outskirts of Yara Laptev.

Ukrainian formations are trying to seize the initiative, using motorized infantry groups from the 67th mechanized brigade and 12th special forces brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine: the fighting is taking place from the southern flank of the Serebryansky forestry. The front line has changed since the fall: individual DRGs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces reached the outskirts of Dibrova, so the Russian Armed Forces are recapturing lost positions in counterattacks.

Despite the activation of the Russian Armed Forces in this sector of the front, a large-scale offensive is complicated by concrete fortifications equipped by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Torskoye - Serebryanskoye forestry - Yampol section . If the possibility of eliminating the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ bridgehead along the right bank of the Zherebets River is quite realistic, then an attack on the Liman will require crossing the river and clearing all territories up to the Oskol reservoir (and this, given the current configuration of the front, will require serious resources and efforts).

Image
In the Soledar direction, Russian troops continue to recapture territories that Ukrainian formations previously managed to capture during the rotation of Wagner PMC units to regular units of the Russian Armed Forces. On the northern flank of the Russian Armed Forces, they managed to reach the eastern outskirts of Bogdanovka , the advanced units are located 100 meters from the first houses. In parallel, from the southwestern outskirts of Dubovo-Vasilevka, an offensive is developing in the direction of Grigorovka and to the northwest towards Orekhovo-Vasilevka: the Russian Armed Forces are fighting for the Kudlin ravine , which separates Russian troops from a nearby settlement.

To the south, Russian assault units from the 200th Motorized Rifle Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces finished clearing the Valyanovsky nursery, where a powerful fortified area of ​​the Ukrainian Armed Forces was equipped. At the same time, progress was also recorded from Khromovo : Russian troops cleared the fortified area of ​​the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Bakhmutsky Shlyakh autodrome. The cleanup of the dachas and SNT located southwest of Bakhmut continues: units of the 4th Infantry Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces are leveling the front line both towards Krasnoye and Kleshcheevka , where, after the capture of height 215.7 the day before yesterday, units of the 346th Special Forces Brigade began attacks on the advance routes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and preparations for expansion of the control zone to the north of the village. But to liberate the southwestern flank, it is necessary to occupy the heights located to the southwest and the so-called “Kleshcheevsky Ridge”. In case of successful advance and occupation of the ridge, the restoration of positions near Andreevka will be facilitated .

As for the attack on Chasov Yar, there is a lot of work to be done: exit is possible from Bogdanovka and Grigorovka , for which fighting is yet to begin. And then, on the northern outskirts of Chasov Yar, several tracts, a mine and a quarry will cause problems. It is more difficult to develop an offensive from the Red side - you will have to go through the lowland.


The Russian Armed Forces continue the operation to encircle the Avdeevsky fortified area. On the northern flank, Russian units advance along the railway towards Novokalinovo , taking up new positions. In Stepovoe (Petrovskoye) it remains in the gray zone.

In addition, there are fierce clashes in the area of ​​the AKHZ treatment facilities and the approaches to the plant itself: the enemy is trying to dislodge the Russian Armed Forces from the front lines in this area, using tanks and artillery. In the area of ​​Severny and Tonenky, positional battles continue without changes to the front line.


In the Vremevsky sector, the front line did not undergo significant changes. The Russian army is waging local battles on the approaches to Staromayorsky and Urozhainy , occupying several enemy strongholds. Ukrainian formations, due to the activity of FPV drones, prefer to carry out rotation and supply at night. But increasingly frequent footage of strikes on Ukrainian Armed Forces units in the dark indicates changing tactics in the use of drones by the Russian Armed Forces.


Routine clashes continue at the Orekhovsky site . In the Rabotino area , an enemy offensive was thwarted, including with the use of FPV drones and artillery. At the same time, in the Verbovoy area, the Ukrainian Armed Forces also tried to move forward. The Russian Airborne Forces units not only repelled the attack, but were also able to somewhat improve their tactical position.


A continuation of the video with another abandoned German Leopard 2A4 tank in the Zaporozhye direction also appeared on the Internet. As colleagues from LostArmour noted , he was shot down last week west of Rabotino . Judging by the footage, after being hit by two anti-tank missiles and FPV drones, the vehicle literally burned out from the inside. The Ukrainian crew there was killed, and their remains are difficult to identify. The video clearly demonstrates that the absence of effective detonation frames after a projectile hits does not at all mean the absence of armor penetration. In this case, the cumulative jets turned the Leopard's fighting compartment, although outwardly the tank looks intact.

There are no significant changes in the Kherson direction : Russian military personnel are non-stop working on the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ bridgehead in Krynki with aviation and artillery. In addition, the Russian Armed Forces are suppressing attempts by Ukrainian formations to expand the zone of control in the landing in the south of the settlement.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas
Local residents reported arrivals on the outskirts of the city of Shebekino in the Belgorod region . In addition, it was reported about the work of air defense in the Grayvoronsky urban district , but there is no detailed information about the incident. Late in the evening, the enemy shelled the village of Vyazovoe and the village of Prilesye, Krasnoyaruzhsky district: there was no information about damage or casualties.

The enemy has reduced the intensity of attacks on the Donetsk agglomeration after recent destructive shelling. Residential buildings in Donetsk and Gorlovka came under enemy fire several times a day , but there were no casualties. Local residents reported shelling of the Starobeshevskaya thermal power plant , but due to the automatic operation, mass outages were avoided.

Image
Ukrainian formations continue to terrorize the left bank of the Kherson region : this time Zavodovka, Cairo, Novaya Kakhovka, Kakhovka, Proletarka, Peschanovka, Korsunka, Aleshki, Dnepryany and Golaya Pristan came under attack. Fortunately, no casualties or injuries were avoided.

Political events
Washington Post about the lack of people in the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Image

The Washington Post published material about the difficulties with the shortage of personnel in the Armed Forces of Ukraine . Much of it is devoted to how Ukrainians are trying to sneak into the EU through closed borders or avoid getting to the front line by other means. The tone of the article should not deceive and create the false impression that the enemy has run out of men. He still has the mobilization resource - it’s not for nothing that recently officials of the Kiev regime have increasingly hinted at the need for a large conscription of students or even women.

And yet, the Ukrainian Armed Forces really have problems with the saturation of manpower, and as the fighting continues and losses continue, they will only grow. The point here is not only the impending social crisis: even the initial preparation of replacements takes time, and it is not at all a fact that the Ukrainian formations have it now. By the way, The Washington Post’s material also contains several funny moments: for example, journalists called the presidential decree on the size of the RF Armed Forces the second wave of mobilization in Russia. Well, in the story about the losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they mentioned that by the beginning of 2023, only 15 thousand people had died in battles.

Apparently, after almost two years of SVO, Western publications still have not gotten rid of the problems of sometimes an absolute misunderstanding of Russian realities and unconditional trust in the narratives of Ukrainian propaganda.

American problems with the allocation of aid to Ukraine

The American information space has suffered an incident: according to Trumpist journalist Tucker Carlson, Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin said during a briefing in Congress that he would send relatives of congressmen to war if they did not allocate funds to Ukrainian forces. Carlson cited the following quote from Austin: “We will send your uncles, cousins ​​and sons to fight Russia.” However, other media in the United States did not provide this quote.

Against this background , White House Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby said that the United States has only a few weeks left to support Ukraine, after which available resources will be completely exhausted before Congress approves the next item of such spending. At the same time, members of the Democratic Party seriously fear that the bill on the allocation of new funds will not be passed by Congress until the end of 2023, which will cause significant damage to the position of the Ukrainian formations.

The essence of the conflict is that Republicans are blocking consideration of this bill until Democrats agree to accept their demands to significantly tighten immigration laws in the United States. This demand is supported by both Trumpists and more “ classical” Russophobe Republicans, such as Lindsey Graham.

Support of the Ukrainian Armed Forces by Western weapons

Germany announced a new package of military assistance to Ukraine , which included 1,750 artillery shells, 70 automatic grenade launchers, about ten drones, trucks and first aid kits, which, compared to previous trenches, is an extremely meager supply, unable to meet the needs of Ukrainian forces even for a day.

Meanwhile, the Australian authorities plan to transfer additional Bushmaster armored vehicles to the Ukrainian Armed Forces by Catholic Christmas to those that were previously delivered.

Against this background, it is noteworthy that the Polish armed forces have agreed to purchase from the Polish defense conglomerate Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa the purchase of another 152 Krab self-propelled howitzers for their needs. Previously, the Polish Army ordered 170 similar self-propelled guns, 54 of which have already been transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. However, some of them have not yet been produced. It is likely that the new contract also includes a large number of supplies of artillery installations to Ukrainian formations.

Bulgaria transfers shells to air defense systems


The Bulgarian authorities approved the supply of “faulty MANPADS” and other anti-aircraft missiles of various types to the Kiev regime. Earlier in the fall, a bill was introduced into the country’s parliament on the transfer of non-operating S-300 systems to the Ukrainian Armed Forces . In total, the Bulgarians have S-300 launchers , as well as Osa-AKM, obsolete Kub and S-200. However, now Ukrainian formations are experiencing a shortage of ammunition for Soviet air defense systems, so they will willingly accept even old missiles.

Authorities in Sofia also promised to help Ukraine train F-16 pilots. The country's Air Force does not yet have aircraft of this type in service (they were only ordered last year), so most likely we are talking about providing airspace with infrastructure for training. It is curious that Bulgaria also intends to train up to four Ukrainian companies with a total number of 160 people per year. Such a meager number can only be explained by the desire of the Bulgarians to report “for show”, avoiding greater participation in the direct training of Armed Forces personnel. In addition, in the evening the parliament overcame the veto of the Bulgarian President on the supply of 100 decommissioned armored personnel carriers for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Now the armored vehicles will go to Ukraine, the deputies motivated this by the fact that the Bulgarian army does not need this equipment, and Bulgaria better protects its national security by helping Ukraine .

Transport crisis on the border with Poland

Truckers from Ukraine continue to park their trucks on the Polish-Ukrainian border . According to the latest data, more than 3,300 cars have already accumulated. Meanwhile, enterprising Ukrainian railway workers decided to make money on their own citizens and businesses by starting to transport trucks on container trains at a price of 1,500 euros per vehicle.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

Establishment Alarmism in Overdrive as Raytheon Lloyd Threatens Congress with War

Image

You’ll recall in the last report I emphasized how the tone was now shifting to: “Russia will invade Europe next!” But even I didn’t expect them to run with that new narrative in such a provocative and alarmist way.

Now a new raft of reports and statements from the usual suspects gives us insight into how desperate the establishment warhawks representing MIC interests have really become.

First, these two videos. Biden openly says that American troops will have to fight Russian troops if Ukraine is not shored up immediately:
(Video at link.)

Kirby and Blinken stepped up the fearmongering as well, evoking spilled “American blood”:

(2 videos at link.)

They’re dialing up the fearporn to a hysteric level like never before:

Image
Source

From the above Breitbart piece:

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned Congress on Tuesday during a private briefing that if they do not pass more aid to Ukraine, it would “very likely” lead to U.S. troops fighting a war in Europe.

“If [Vladimir] Putin takes over Ukraine, he’ll get Moldova, Georgia, then maybe the Baltics,” House Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul (R-TX) told The Messenger, after Austin and other senior Biden administration officials briefed House lawmakers on their request for more aid for Ukraine.

“And then the idea that we’ll have to put troops on the ground in Secretary Austin’s word was very likely,” McCaul added. “That’s what we’re trying to avoid.”


Recall in the last report I cited Moldova as precisely the next vector, given the sensitivity of the PMR pressure point for Russia.

Most notable is his express use of the qualifier “very likely” to describe U.S. troops fighting on the ground. In fact, the U.S. has been preparing for this grand European war for a while now. Reports have continued to come out this year about NATO attempting to remold the eastern flank’s infrastructure to properly prepare it logistically for a war:

⚡️⚡️⚡️The EC calls for a 1435 mm European gauge railway to be built in the Baltics by 2030. But there is no certainty that Rail Baltica will be built in time

The fact is that the main difficulties faced by Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia are financial in nature.

For example, according to information from the Ministry of Transport of Latvia, from 2015 to 2023, Latvian construction participants have already spent 916 million euros on the Rail Baltica transport infrastructure project, almost half of the initially planned 2 billion.

But the 2 billion, once planned, are small things in life, adjusted for sanctions and inflation. Now the Latvian part of the project needs 8 billion, and this according to the most conservative estimates.

Taking advantage of the strategic importance of the project, the prime ministers of the Baltic countries will soon travel to Brussels to ask for money⚡️⚡️⚡️


Add the above to recent reports of the NATO ‘military Schengen’ which I recently covered, and we get a clear picture of the slow attempt to move Europe onto a war footing, with the attendant infrastructural revampments.

But most startling of all, is a new report, which Tucker Carlson says is “confirmed” by his private sources, that Lloyd Austin has resorted to outright threatening the Republican House holdouts, telling them “We’ll send your kids to fight Russia” if they don’t break their deadlock over the Ukrainian aid:

Image

BREAKING REPORT: Sec. of Defense Lloyd Austin threatens members of classified briefing that if they don’t appropriate more money for Zelensky and Ukraine, “WE'LL SEND YOUR UNCLES, COUSINS AND SONS TO FIGHT RUSSIA."

Essentially saying pay them, or we’ll kill your kids...[/i]

So why this unhinged urgency just now?

The reason has to do with this. Congress-correspondent for Bloomberg news writes:

Image

So it sounds like the Ukrainian aid may be completely dead for the rest of this year. Congress will soon go on Christmas recess. After that, the prospects are dim for a long time.

This Ukrainian post captures precisely the outlook of what to expect:

Our success next year will depend on how quickly Congress can agree on a funding package for us for fiscal year 2024 (October 1, 23-September 30, 24).

Currently, some money is still left, and the States provide us with small packages until the global solution of the issue.

But this is to support the pants, nothing more.

If the funding is voted before Christmas (25.12), the first packages will be announced in January-February, and the equipment will arrive from the end of March to the beginning of April.

The problem is that we're going to have a pretty limited window of opportunity next year offensively.

This is due to the fact that after the elections in the swamps, they will most likely announce mass mobilization for the second time. That is, somewhere in the middle of August, the first formed enemy units from mobiks will be at the front.

After the Avdiivka operation (and possibly the Kupyan operation), the enemy will be badly beaten. But our units will also be exhausted.

Therefore, it will not be possible to immediately make a counterattack.

Taking this into account, we will have no more than 2 months. This year there were 5.5 months, for example.

You can "thank" those Trumpist scumbags who in every possible way hindered the adoption of the budget, arranged a speaker's meeting, and now they generally want to tie our package to the border with Mexico (which Mexico, bld????).

👉 Ukrainian Post


Image

So, according to them, even if the funding were to have processed this month, they wouldn’t get the first major deliveries until March and April. So now imagine what happens if it’s true that the funding is dead for this year. Congress won’t come back from recess until January and their docket will be full. They won’t have opportunity to begin even attempting to vote on Ukraine again until well into Jan or even February.

If they happen to reach some agreement, major equipment may not arrive until April, May, or even later. Ukraine may be in a complete deadzone for months from this point forward, and that’s on top of a potentially hellacious winter campaign of infrastructural strikes Russia plans to carry out.

Lloyd Austin, Biden, and co., have dialed up the fearporn precisely because they see the above projection and know what it entails. So they’ve resorted to trying to scare the pants off the GOP congressmen to ram through that aid, but it seems the cheap tactic didn’t work.

That’s not to mention the fact that Russia is now advancing on every single front, with breakthroughs everywhere. A female Ukrainian volunteer said in an interview: (Video at link.)

This threatens the Armed Forces of Ukraine to retreat by tens of kilometers in weeks: The Armed Forces of Ukraine are running out of people, Russia has overtaken Ukraine in drones by several times

▪️Ukraine is years behind the Russian Federation in terms of drones, because their production is under Putin’s personal control,” said volunteer M. Berlinskaya.

▪️“We wasted our time, and if before there was parity, now the Russians have overtaken us many times over. The more they automate their systems and move towards swarms of drones, when the drone itself recognizes the target and makes the decision to hit the target... And when thousands of UAVs fly at us, we will retreat tens of kilometers in a matter of weeks.”

▪️“Now it’s not even a stalemate on the chessboard, but a moment of losing. I believe that our people are old enough to be told the truth. And this truth must be heard from the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.”

▪️“Where there are no drones, people become expendable. We have reached a point where we are running out of people. And if we run out of people, we will have to sit down at the negotiating table. For us, this means defeat,” Berlinskaya said.


Many Ukrainian public figures, politicians, etc., are all beginning to come around to the realities. Rada Deputy Goncharenko, for example, broadcasts this take from in front of the White House, now suddenly calling Russia the indubitable “2nd [most powerful] army in the world,” proclaiming that no other force in the 21st century is as experienced in modern warfare as the Russian army: (Video at link.)


Interestingly, the official account of the UK Ministry of Defense seems to agree. They were forced to grudgingly report that a vast number of combat experienced officers are now flooding through the Russian military academy system:

Image

But recall that all this hardship for Ukraine comes amidst a crash in their exports as multiple countries are now blocking Ukrainian truck transports, with the maritime economy already long suppressed.

This amounts to massive deficits in the Ukrainian budget, with rumors suggesting social services will be cut starting from January 2024. Furthermore, it gives us an inkling as to the real reasons behind why Zelensky isn’t able to do a full societal mobilization in the way many believed he has no choice but to carry out. That’s because the Ukrainian economy is already hanging by a thread.

I’ve reported before how sources indicate Ukrainian may now be down below 20M population. The young, educated white collar and working class tech workers of Kiev and the big cities are just about the last thing left keeping the Ukrainian economy afloat. To yank them up may rob the Ukrainian state of its last few dribbled drops of financial receipts.

In fact, the conversation has grown louder in Ukrainian society about this very fact, of late.

Kyiv is “the most undermobilized city in Ukraine,” says ex-Aidar* commander Evgeniy Diky.

“ It seems to me that the authorities are afraid of strong mobilization in Kiev, because mobilization is always an unpopular thing. But excuse me, war is an unpopular thing. Unpopular things need to be done. And Kiev in this sense should stop being an oasis,” Dikiy said .

(Video at link)


And the following pertinent rumor:

Our sources said that the President's Office banned the General Staff from conducting active mobilization in Kiev, so as not to set up residents of the capital against Zelensky. On Bankova Street, they are afraid that Kiev residents will become the vanguard of Maidan-3, which is why the capital is the most protected city in Ukraine, and there are almost no military commissars on the streets.

(Much more at link.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/est ... -overdrive

********

Biden Administration Fearmongers Over Article 5 Event

Stoltenberg is a mediocre salesman:

NATO chief says Ukraine will join the military alliance, subject to reforms, after the war - Yahoo / Euronews - Nov 28, 2023

Ukraine will become a member of NATO subject to reforms after the war, the military alliance’s secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, said on Monday.
He was speaking ahead of a meeting of foreign ministers in Brussels, at which the alliance is expected to reaffirm its support for Ukraine’s defence against Russia’s full-scale invasion.


Whatever Stoltenberg might say, it is not going to happen. There is no purpose for Ukraine to be integrated to NATO except for U.S. self-aggrandization. Some assume that NATO membership would protect Ukraine from further attacks by Russia. It would not.

The U.S. itself does not believes that NATO membership protects any country from being attacked by Russia:

‘If you think the price is high now’ – Kirby outlines price U.S. will pay if Ukraine loses war - Yahoo - Dec 7, 2023

“America will not only spend money, but also shed its own blood,” if the U.S. doesn't assist Ukraine in its war against Russia and Russia prevails, said National Security spokesperson John Kirby during a briefing.
...
“If you think the cost of supporting Ukraine is high now just imagine how much higher it's going to be not just in National Treasure but in American blood if he [Putin] starts going after one of our NATO allies… we [will] take our Article 5 commitments very seriously,” said Kirby.
...
“American boots would very much have to be involved if Mr. Putin is allowed to have this strategic victory in Ukraine and then perhaps goes after one of our NATO allies,” Kirby added.


Kirby obviously believes that NATO membership does not protect one from a Russian attack. He fearmongers about U.S. participation in a war under an allegedly binding Article 5 event.

But it is a myth that Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (which founded NATO) will guarantee that others would come to a members defense with their own armies.

Article 5 does not say anything like that. Here is its essence:

The Parties agree ... that .. each of them ... will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith ... such action as it deems necessary ...

"Such action as it deems necessary ..." may include a lot of potential measures (including none) which differ from sending one's army.

Would the U.S. really go to war with another nuclear superpower over some tussle between Estonia (1.4 million inhabitants of which a third are ethnic Russian) and the Russian Federation?

I for one find this very unlikely.

Posted by b on December 8, 2023 at 16:25 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/12/b ... .html#more

********

“No NATO” for Ukraine, Ukrainian Politician Says
Posted on December 9, 2023 by Yves Smith

Yves here. It’s noteworthy to see that divisions are developing over the question of NATO membership for Ukraine, of course assuming anything other than a small rump state with fantasies of retaking the territory that joins Russia (and what if other European countries gobble up bits as supposed charity?).

This is not as surprising as it may seem. One of the major Western fantasies for how to extract the US from Project Ukraine without having too much egg on its face is to somehow negotiate a ceasefire….when recall in March 2021, Russia kept prosecuting the war as it was negotiating. We did the same in the Vietnam peace talks. So any durable stop to the kinetic war is very likely to come at the end of, and not early in, negotiations. We still think any negotiated end to the war is vanishingly unlikely, for among other reasons that this is a war with the US and NATO, NATO cannot agree to any deal due to needing to have every state commit individually, which is na ga happen, and the Russian public would go berserk with any deal that did more than take a wee bit of sting out of a Ukraine capitulation.

But the tidbit below, on the US trying to get Ukraine to shut up on the topic of NATO, does point to the US recognizing the Ukraine cause is lost. The more any members with influence in the Collective West keep talking up Ukraine membership in NATO, an absolute red line for Russia. the more it will cement the Russian view that it must continue the war until Ukraine is prostrated and it can install a complaint government.

By Uriel Araujo, researcher with a focus on international and ethnic conflicts. Originally published at InfoBRICS


US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is pressuring European diplomats to cease any talks about Ukraine joining NATO, according to a member of Rada (the Ukrainian parliament), Oleksiy Goncharenko. This is no minor politician. The son of a former Odessa mayor, he is a member of the Ukrainian Permanent Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE). The allegations were publicly made in a series of texts posted in his Telegram channel (in Ukrainian). He wrote: “Unfortunately, there will be no NATO [for Ukraine]. Forget about it – it won’t happen.” Goncharenko claims that “several sources” in Washington told him the topic of Ukraine’s accession to the Atlantic Alliance “annoys the US elite” and even “after war” the country should not expect it.

The politician also commented on the ongoing friction between the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Valery Zaluzhny. According to Goncharenko, Washington is “not happy” about it. In addition, he says, one should expect the next aid package to Ukraine to be the last one: “In a year, at the end of 2024, we will not be given any more money… Most likely, we will switch to a credit form of cooperation. They’ll give a loan. Not a grant that won’t need to be repaid.”

Could such allegations be a fabrication created for propaganda purposes? There is no reason to think so and the logic of it in this case would be far from clear. In fact, Goncharenko’s claims make perfect sense in light of what we already know by now.

We know the US has been pressuring its ally to hold elections. Moreover, the US Mission to NATO last month posted on X (formerly Twitter) a vague message about Washington being “focused on setting the conditions for a just, durable, and sustainable peace” in Ukraine. We also know that European Union (EU) member states are divided over the bloc’s common budget, including additional funding for Kyiv in 2024.

In addition, Pulitzer winner journalist Seymour Hersh has written that, according to his American diplomacy and intelligence sources, the aforementioned General Valery Zaluzhny has been directly negotiating a peace deal with Russian general Valery Gerasimov, independently of Zelensky, who is described as a “wild card”. According to the journalist: “The two generals may continue to talk and Putin may indeed be interested in a settlement that gives him permanent control of Crimea and the four provinces he has claimed, but Zelensky remains the wild card. The American official said that Zelensky has been told that “this is a military-to-military problem to solve and the talks will go on with or without you.” If necessary, the American official told me, “We can finance his voyage to the Caribbean’.”

We know that the unprecedented sanctions against the Russian Federation have been backfiring since the beginning, with the Eurasian great power reaching record trade surplus as early as May 2022. That has sparked division within the European continent, and how de-industralized post-Nord Stream Europe has been hurt by the ongoing conflict and by American subsidy war.

As early as April 2023, as I wrote, former US ambassador to Finland, Earle Mack wrote that the US-led West had been “propping up Ukraine to fight a proxy war” but he could only see “a decade of death and chaos” for the country.

In May Zelensky was planning a number of bold actions against Russia, including bombing the Druzhba pipeline that provides Russian oil to Hungary (a NATO member), and even occupying Russian villages plus targeting the Russian Federation with long-range missiles. Such plans crossed some red lines and were a huge problem from the point of view of both the US and that of Ukraine’s neighbors.

That same month, aforementioned Serymour Hersh also reported that countries such as Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and the Czech Republic, led by Poland (with Germany playing some role in it too) had been pressuring the Ukrainian leader “to find a way to end the war, even by resigning himself if necessary, and to allow the process of rebuilding his nation to get under way.” According to Hersh’s CIA source at the time, these European leaders had “made it clear that ‘Zelensky can keep what he’s got – a villa in Italy and interests in offshore bank accounts – ‘if he works up a peace deal even if he’s got to be paid off, if it’s the only way to get a deal’.” Few months later, in September, Poland stopped sending Ukraine weapons, allegedly over a trade dispute, as bilateral relations deteriorated.

All of this points to a clear picture emerging, one that had been haunting Ukraine for a while: Western abandonment and betrayal – something of which Washington has a solid record. From an European perspective, the picture is even more dramatic: it is about the bloc’s own interests. As I wrote, in December 2021, American and European energy interests are far from converging and in fact the energy crisis in that part of the Old World is something that has benefited Washington, while hurting its European allies – and the same can be said about the American proxy attrition war in Eastern Europe. It is about time to admit NATO’s expansion has been a recipe for disaster and about time to admit Ukraine has a far-right problem and a problem with the way it deals with the Russian minority – and not just in Donbass. And all of that is a problem for Europe, too.

It remains to be seen how European leaders will conduct their policy pertaining to Ukraine and also to the strategic energy interests of the continent. One may expect many European voices urging the bloc to reconsider sanctions against Russia, for instance, as has been the case already. For a start, it could reconsider its stance on the issue of the rights of ethnic minorities.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/12 ... -says.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sun Dec 10, 2023 1:49 pm

Looking to 2025
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 12/10/2023

Image

Just a few days after Volodymyr Zelensky announced a “new phase” of the war, this time defensive, the media on the ground have confirmed that preparations have begun to strengthen the trenches with which Ukraine hopes to prevent Russian advances. A report published by The Wall Street Journal , for example, has observed fortification work in the Krasny Liman area, in the part of Donetsk under Ukrainian control. Since the failure of the Ukrainian offensive on northern Lugansk, which sought to threaten Russian control over Kremennaya and Svatovo, cities that Ukraine hoped to be able to capture by the end of 2022, Krasny Liman has become one of the possible targets of the advance Russian in Donbass, the only region where the battle is expected to continue throughout the winter months. Despite the constant statements made in recent months by Zelensky and his team about the continuation of the Ukrainian counteroffensive in winter, the move to a defensive war, implicit acceptance of the failure of the counteroffensive, eliminates that possibility. So does the difficulty of Ukraine's allies in securing the approval of new funds to continue the supply of weapons, ammunition and financing that guarantees that kyiv can fulfill its plans.

“The free world needs to maintain support for those whose freedom is under attack,” Zelensky stated in his recent communication to G7 members, to whom he insisted that “Ukraine has strength. I ask you to be as strong as you can be.” The Ukrainian president's speech is clear and has a simple objective: to ensure that everything continues as before, something much more difficult when Ukraine is not able to present its partners with clear results with which to justify the funds, which are increasingly difficult to obtain. in the face of the growing fatigue of this war. “Ukraine is no longer special,” says a source from the German Marshall Fund cited by The Financial Times in an article that is extremely worrying for Kiev. “This issue is no longer considered a matter of national security or of primary importance to the EU, NATO or the United States. Because if that were the case, people wouldn't be playing politics with him,” he adds. This vision is precisely what Ukraine tries to avoid, aware that only the favor of the West and a definition of the war as existential can guarantee it to continue with its plans of not accepting any resolution to the war that does not imply its complete victory.

Zelensky's words to the G7 show that the Ukrainian president has understood this reality and is trying to limit his risks. “Russia only hopes one thing: that next year the consolidation of the free world will collapse. "Russia believes that America and Europe will show weakness and will not maintain support for Ukraine," he stated, confusing the United States with America and the European Union with Europe and exploiting one of the great arguments to continue the common war effort against Russia: the moral duty of the West. to support Ukraine until complete victory.

The risk of defeat continues to coexist with the opposite argument, according to which Ukraine insists on its military strength and the possibility of complete victory in the short term, of course, as long as military supplies are maintained. Faced with the proliferation of Western articles and opinions that consider the Ukrainian offensive failed and wonder if the West will be able to repeat the enormous flow of weapons and ammunition for a new offensive, media outlets such as the Efe Agency continue to give credence to the Ministry of Defense's speech. from Ukraine. Under the subtitle "Russian counteroffensive failed", an article published yesterday took as true the Ukrainian claims of maintaining all Ukrainian defensive lines in the face of a Russian advance that they describe as failed. The Ukrainian command continues to allege huge Russian casualties and adds that it is “practically impossible” for Russia to capture the city of Avdeevka in the coming weeks, where even Western media take for granted those Russian advances that kyiv denies. “Surrounded and short of ammunition, elite troops seek to ruin Putin's New Year” headlines, for example, an article published yesterday by The Times in which an epic Ukrainian fight against the Russian advance in Avdeevka is presented. “Without getting more equipment, your chances diminish,” admits Maxim Tucker, a well-known pro-Ukrainian journalist.

“Kiev's forces are now digging in for what could be an extended period of simply trying to stop further Russian advances,” The Wall Street Journal explains along the same lines , adding that “Western diplomats and military strategists say the exhausted Ukraine “It needs time to rebuild and may not be able to prepare another significant counteroffensive until 2025.” Ukraine has barely implicitly admitted the failure of the 2023 counteroffensive and is seeking financing for the 2024 counteroffensive, but certain media are already pointing to two years ahead, a space in which Ukraine would need constant financial assistance and that would give Russia some time. significant to take advantage of the production of its military industry and further increase the existing imbalance of forces in certain areas such as aviation and artillery.

The West has already accepted that Russia is preparing for a long war and intends to adapt to these circumstances by proposing, according to this scenario published by The Wall Street Journal , an even longer calendar than expected. “It is an important change in the feelings of the beginning of the year, when kyiv - spurred by having reversed previous Russian advances with a large influx of Western weapons - launched itself to expel Russian troops from the almost 20% of Ukrainian territory it occupied. "Ukraine's allies had hoped that it could inflict enough damage on Russian troops so that President Vladimir Putin would see that the war was useless and agree to negotiations acceptable to Kiev," insists The Wall Street Journal , which does not dwell on the motives. why the West so radically erred in its predictions. Time and the absence of significant changes on the front have proven that Ukraine and its allies erred in believing their own propaganda, which proclaimed a series of platitudes that have turned out to be false. The West prepared a ground offensive that required air superiority without understanding that Ukraine did not have the capacity to further restore balance. The idea of ​​the very low morale of the Russian troops was believed and, above all, the capacity of Russian weapons compared to Western weapons was also underestimated, as well as the Russian ability to adapt to events and draw lessons from its past failures.

The doses of reality that Ukraine has received on the front have caused surprise and constant changes in discourse and strategy, something that has been reflected especially in the media. This is the case of The Telegraph , which a few months ago declared the war lost for Vladimir Putin, but now warns that “Putin is close to victory.” Considering that the Western media has made it clear that any scenario in which Russia did not conquer all of Ukraine would be considered a Russian defeat, the warning of a possible Russian victory not only seems misplaced but a tool to argue the need to deliver more weapons to Ukraine. Although there is no sign of the preparation of a large-scale Russian offensive - Russia has not carried out a new mobilization since September 2022 -, according to the British media, “the danger is that the EU faces the same fate as the Holy Empire. Roman".

The exaggeration and constant insistence on continuing to arm Ukraine even at times when new offensive actions to recover territory under Russian control are not expected have become the central argument of the speech. Hence, the new scenario involves supporting Ukraine in a phase, not only defensive, but also in expectations of a large-scale Russian offensive. “Another hope recently expressed at the NATO summit was that Russia's attempts to breach Ukrainian defenses will fail, undermining its resources and potentially offering better prospects for Ukraine to regain the initiative on the battlefield in spring 2025. if he manages to get through next year.” Observing offensive planning almost two years ahead, the Ukrainian-Canadian academic Ivan Katchanovski once again denounced the West's intention to fight Russia "to the last Ukrainian." Condemning the country to the continuation of the misery of war, death and destruction remains the common language of kyiv, Washington, London and Brussels.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/12/10/28721/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for December 9
December 9, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Soledar direction, Russian troops are fighting their way to Bogdanovka in the north. In addition, according to preliminary data, northeast of Bakhmut , the Russian Armed Forces are conducting active operations towards Vesely . To the south, battles continue for the high-lying stronghold “Ostrov” near Kleshcheevka , control of which will significantly improve the tactical position of the fighters.

It became known that in the Avdeevsky sector , the Russian Armed Forces were able to liberate the Donetsk filtration station on the ring road east of Avdeevka. Ukrainian formations have occupied this facility since 2014, since the beginning of the so-called “ATO.” Near the industrial zone previously occupied by Russian troops, fighting is taking place in the sand quarry and the holiday village “Iva” near the SNT “Vinogradniki”.

Meanwhile, as before, fighting is taking place in the Orekhovsky sector: Ukrainian formations again tried to attack near Rabotino and Verbov , but to no avail. However, Russian fighters managed to seize the initiative and, according to preliminary data, were able to successfully counterattack and advance more than a kilometer.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Fierce fighting continues in the Svatovsko-Kremensky sector east of Yampolovka and Ternov . Russian troops are biting into the defenses of Ukrainian formations at Yar Laptev, but so far there have been no significant changes in the area. In addition, fighting continues in the Kremensky forest. Artillery and unmanned aircraft are actively operating along the entire line of contact; the Russian Aerospace Forces are striking the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces with air bombs equipped with UPMK.


On the northern flank of the Soledar direction, Russian troops continue their slow movement towards Bogdanovka , repelling counterattacks by Ukrainian formations. At the same time, there is an expansion of the zone of control around the autodrome and the Valnyanovsky nursery , liberated by Russian troops earlier. In addition, according to preliminary data, the Russian Armed Forces made a breakthrough towards Vesely to the north-west of Bakhmut and, with the help of airborne troops, almost took the settlement into a semicircle. However, there is no confirmation of this information yet.

On the southern flank there is an assault on the Ukrainian stronghold “Ostrov” , located on the heights near Kleshcheevka . Its capture will significantly improve the position of Russian troops in this area. In addition, the Russian Armed Forces expanded the control zone around the recently occupied height 215.7 in this area.


In the area of ​​the Avdeevsky fortified area, active clashes continue. At Stepovoy , the RF Armed Forces are consolidating at previously achieved milestones. To the southeast, Russian troops have advanced and are fighting on the northern outskirts of the Iva holiday village. In addition, it became known that the fighters took full control of the Donetsk filtration station on the ring road east of Avdeevka . The fighting has been going on here since 2015, and the positions of the Ukrainian formations have been well fortified since then, which significantly complicated the assault.

On the southern flank, fighting is taking place in the area of ​​the previously captured Yasinovatskaya industrial zone : the Russian Armed Forces are fighting for a sand quarry adjacent to the Vinogradniki SNT, the capture of which will allow them to advance to the west.


In the Orekhovsky sector , despite worsening weather conditions and a slight decrease in the intensity of fighting, the enemy is trying to regain lost positions west of Rabotino , but to no avail. In addition, Russian troops were able to repel the onslaught and occupy several new enemy strongholds. The Russian Armed Forces are also advancing in the Novofedorovka area along the N-08 highway and east of Verbovoy , but the more precise configuration of the front is still unknown. According to preliminary data, Russian troops managed to cover about 1 kilometer.


There are no significant changes in the Kherson direction : Russian military personnel are not giving up attempts to dislodge Ukrainian formations from the bridgehead in Krynki . At the same time, UAV operators from the Russian Armed Forces managed to catch several boats that were transporting Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel to the left bank. Several enemy watercraft went to the bottom along with the enemy.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
Ukrainian formations shelled the Bryansk region . In the Sevsky district, the village of Lemeshovka came under attack . Four houses and a local agricultural enterprise were damaged, but no one was injured. Another target of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was Zapesochye in the Pogarsky district. In addition, local residents reported shelling of the village of Krasnooktyabrsky, Glushkovsky district , Kursk region ; there was no information about damage or casualties. In the Belgorod region, the enemy launched attacks on the village of Novopetrovka and the outskirts of the Shebekinsky district .


In the afternoon, Ukrainian formations fired four MLRS rockets at an oil depot in Makeyevka . Some of the ammunition was intercepted by air defense systems, but several missiles hit the facility, where a large fire occurred; there was no information about the wounded or casualties.

Image
In addition to the shelling of Makeyevka, the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out multiple strikes on Donetsk throughout the day : in the Kirovsky district, a woman was injured by a shell dropped from a UAV, in Petrovsky, six more people were injured as a result of a shell dropped from a UAV, and residential buildings were damaged in Kuibyshevsky. In addition, the enemy damaged power lines in Yasinovataya , and the city was partially without power. Local residents also reported shelling of Khartsyzsk .

Image
In the Kherson region, Ukrainian formations carried out a series of attacks on Nova Kakhovka, Kakhovka, Proletarka, Peschanivka, Korsunka, Aleshki, Dnepryany and Gola Pristan , again causing damage to civilian infrastructure and residential buildings. At the same time, there is no information about casualties and injuries as a result of the attack.

Political events
About Western assistance to the Ukrainian Armed Forces


The results of a sociological survey conducted by Pew among US citizens have appeared online . Thus, 31% of respondents believe that the United States should reduce the amount of assistance to Ukrainian formations, and among those who support Republicans this figure is about 48%. Against this background, a statement by the wife of the Ukrainian president, Elena Zelenskaya, was circulated online, declaring that without Western help, “Ukraine will perish.”

In turn, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that Germany should be ready to help Ukraine even more if the support of “other countries” weakens, meaning, apparently, the United States.

Demolition of the monument to Nikolai Shchors


Today in Kiev , a monument to the red Ukrainian commander Nikolai Shchors, which was called the calling card of the capital of Ukraine and one of the most beautiful in the country and Europe , was demolished . It was not possible to remove the monument with a crane the first time - the horse's hooves welded to the concrete base got in the way. However, the Ukrainians dealt with this by sawing off those very hooves from the work of art.

Local media believe that the high-profile demolition was organized to divert the population's attention from problems in Kiev : a few days ago, metro tunnels were flooded in the capital, and the consequences of this were so fatal that 6 blue line stations will be closed for repairs for about six months. Against this background, the central authorities also joined the conflict: the country's Prime Minister Denis Shmygal said that it was necessary to conduct an investigation, noting that the flooding of the metro was caused by the “action” or “inaction” of the city authorities, implying that Mayor Vladimir Klitschko openly opposed Zelensky .

Anti-Russian language reform in Ukraine

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted a bill on languages ​​for national minorities, which is completely discriminatory in relation to the Russian language , which is spoken by more than half of the country's population. So, initially, according to this law, the Russian language was to be deprived of its rights for 5 years after the end of the war, after which some relaxations may arise - permission for partial television and radio broadcasting in Russian, as well as the publication of books. In the new version of the law, the provision for 5 years was excluded altogether - now Russians will be discriminated against indefinitely .

At the same time, such relaxations will apply to Romanian, Hungarian, Bulgarian and other languages ​​of the European Union . Whether the European Commission will find discrimination against the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine after the adoption and implementation of reform in this format is a rhetorical question. But it was the EC that was one of the main demands for the adoption of a bill designed to ensure the rights of national minorities.

Ukrainian refugees have chosen the Norwegian fjords

Over the past two months, Norway has received 50 percent more Ukrainians than all the Nordic countries combined. According to the UN , more than 60 thousand Ukrainian refugees arrived in Norway by December 2023. Over the past month, the number of arrivals has begun to grow sharply, with about 1 thousand arriving every week . people - approximately two thirds arrive directly from Ukraine, the rest - in transit through other European countries. “Never before have so many refugees been accommodated in Norway in such a short time ,” noted the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI).

In this regard, the authorities are tightening control over Ukrainian refugees. The tightening is happening in four directions:

+ Cancellation of retroactive payments for a child after receiving refugee status for the previous year;

+ Limiting the possibility of travel between Ukraine and Norway for persons who have received refugee status. Norwegian services will ensure that refugees actually live in Norway most of the time, and if travel contradicts the conditions for obtaining this status, they will have to say goodbye to it;

+ Refugees are required to seek help from the National Reception Center in the municipality of Rode ; those arriving in other regions of the country will not receive support at all;

+ Hotels will no longer be used as places to accommodate refugees; they will be placed in specialized places of detention - centers for refugees.

Norwegian authorities admit that until now their country has had too lenient and easy conditions for new arrivals. But in the near future, measures will be taken to correct the situation and resolve the current crisis. Some Ukrainians receive benefits in Sweden , which somewhat compensate for the difference. However, as of August 2023, benefits in Norway were 2–4 times higher than in Sweden, compared to Denmark , the level of benefits in Norway was approximately twice as high. The authorities plan to further tighten policies if current solutions are not effective enough. The country's government explained that the number of refugees now does not correspond to Norway's capabilities.

Statements by Rustam Umerov

Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustam Umerov promised to recapture Crimea from Russia next year, as his country is preparing some “developments” that could supposedly force the Russian Federation to leave the peninsula. However, this is not the first time we have heard such promises from the Ukrainian authorities.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -dekabrya/

Google Translator

******

All rights for the Russian language were removed from the law on national minorities
15:43, December 8, 2023

Image
The Russian language was deprived of rights in the Rada. Photo: Channel 24

The Verkhovna Rada approved the updated law on expanding the rights of national minorities No. 10288-1. 317 people's deputies voted for him.

The adoption of this law was one of the EU conditions for starting negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the community. Hungary especially insisted on it.

People's Deputy Alexey Goncharenko reported details about the new language bill in his Telegram channel.

Judging by his words, the document weakens Ukrainization for national minorities whose language is official in the EU. But not for the Russian language.

The bill allows for education in European languages ​​(Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian), political agitation, book publishing and television broadcasting (no more than 70%). European national minorities will be able to receive secondary (including specialized) and higher education in their own languages.

Let us recall that in the original version of the bill it was envisaged that certain rights would be granted to the Russian language 5 years after the end of martial law. However, as Goncharenko said, all these points for the Russian language were removed from the bill, removing the provision that restrictions on it are valid for only five years. In the current version, the restrictions will last indefinitely.

Image

As soon as this bill was introduced into the Rada, supporters of Ukrainization raised a scandal, saying that it expands the rights of the Russian language , and also gives the right to education in the languages ​​of national minorities that are official in the EU (that is, Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian, etc.). d.).

Meanwhile, the European Commission will not take into account the situation with the Russian language as a criterion for starting negotiations on Ukraine's accession to the EU.

https://strana.news/news/452420-rada-od ... skoho.html

"They need to be crossed out." Actor Benyuk, following Farion, said that Russian-speaking military personnel are not Ukrainians
18:46, November 22, 2023

Image
Benyuk agrees with Farion. Photo: Facebook

Actor Bogdan Benyuk supported Irina Farion’s statement that Russian-speaking military personnel are not Ukrainians.

He said this in an interview with Ukrainian media.

Benyuk believes that Farion "said the right thing." According to the artist, those Ukrainians who continue to communicate in Russian continue to promote the “Russian world” in Ukraine.

“And this must be recognized by everyone. First of all, the leaders of the state who encourage this, all employees working in government agencies, the leadership of the Ukrainian army and commanders who take the oath to serve Ukraine in the Ukrainian language. Farion said the right thing and was not afraid of it to do during the war,” said the artist.

Benyuk added that he considers Ukrainians who continue to communicate in Russian after the start of the war to be “invaders.” And also those who did not stop speaking it after moving abroad.

“Those people who grew up in Ukraine need to think about it. Shame on them! The fact that they defend Ukraine is great. But they defend by speaking the language of the invader. This is unacceptable. They must understand this and change their attitude towards the most important thing - Ukrainian citizenship. Because that citizen of Ukraine who is a native speaker is considered a citizen, and I consider everyone else to be invaders. This also applies to Ukrainians abroad. If they do not communicate in the Ukrainian language, then what kind of Ukrainians are they? They need to be crossed out and said that they Russians," Benyuk said.

Let us recall that in early November, on the air of the “Rendezvous” program of journalist Yanina Sokolova, Farion stated that she does not consider the military from “Azov” who speak Russian to be Ukrainians . These words caused a great resonance.

We examined in detail the situation with Farion's statement .

https://strana.news/news/451124-bohdan- ... intsy.html

Google TRanslator

These people are insane.

******

Swedish minister at the front
December 10, 12:16

Image

Swedish minister at the front

Swedish Defense Minister Mikael Büden visited Ukraine and inspected the location of the 45th brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, to which Swedish armored vehicles and other weapons were previously supplied. Recently, 155-mm Archer wheeled self-propelled guns and ammunition were transferred to the same brigade. These self-propelled guns are already participating in combat operations.

Since 2022, Sweden has been actively supplying various weapons to Ukraine: tanks, various armored fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, grenade launchers, MANPADS, small arms, ammunition, equipment. Currently under consideration is the possibility of supplying Grippen fighters in the medium term.

Of course, Sweden, even without being a member of NATO, is one of the direct accomplices of the United States in inciting war in Ukraine. And Sweden’s course towards Russia is currently completely hostile.

Budin himself is far from the first Western leader to come to the Ukrainian front. Back in 2016, the then commander of US ground forces in Europe, General Hodges, came to the front in the Donbass with mantras identical to Budin: “The United States will continue to provide assistance to the Ukrainian army.” So Budin, even at the verbal level, copies the overlord.

Sweden thus shows that it is fully following the Washington course and will continue to spend significant resources to support the Armed Forces of Ukraine even in the face of obvious domestic political problems in the United States. Accordingly, it is premature to count on the fact that the European vassals of the United States have had some kind of insight. Now, first of all, they expect the United States to solve its internal problems and return to the previous regime of financing the Armed Forces of Ukraine. But before that, they have to hold the line, demonstrating support for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (including with such visits), and scrape out the remaining resources to transfer to Ukraine.

(c) especially for RT

https://t.me/c/1686844692/5358 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8818816.html

Fulfilling international duty
December 9, 23:24

Image

Cuban comrades are fulfilling their international duty in the Northwestern Military District zone. Like once in Angola.

(Video at link. short)

Just like the good old days of the Cold War. We are with the Cubans against the Western imperialists.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8818354.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply